VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Harrigan v. Hansen et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2011-06-22
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DESHAUNE HARRIGAN, ) D.C. CV. No. 2008-136 Petitioner, ) ) Ref.: D.C. CR. NO. 2000-599 v. ) ) EVERETT HANSEN, WARDEN VI BUREAU ) OF CORRECTIONS; D.B. DREW, COLEMAN ) FCC COMPLEX WARDEN; MARY MITCHELL, ) COLEMAN FCC LOW WARDEN, ) Respondents. ) __________________________________ ) O R D E R THIS MATTER initially came before the Court on Deshaune Harrigan’s (“Harrigan”) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that his parole eligibility date was being improperly calculated; that he was not being credited with the applicable good time credits; and that he would like to serve the remainder of his local sentence in the Virgin Islands. The Government moved to dismiss Harrigan’s § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because he is not in custody in the District of the Virgin Islands.1 Harrigan replied that as a 1 Petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined. United States v. Kennedy, 851 F.2d 689, 690 (3d Cir. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_08-cv-00136/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_08-cv-00136-0.pdf

SHA-256 04e158bd8a33aad2b26b5aa122b86b6af80e1fa2cca5258d3eecf81d3d664457

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-04e158bd8a33

Document text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DESHAUNE HARRIGAN, ) D.C. CV. No. 2008-136 Petitioner, ) ) Ref.: D.C. CR. NO. 2000-599 v. ) ) EVERETT HANSEN, WARDEN VI BUREAU ) OF CORRECTIONS; D.B. DREW, COLEMAN ) FCC COMPLEX WARDEN; MARY MITCHELL, ) COLEMAN FCC LOW WARDEN, ) Respondents. ) __________________________________ ) O R D E R THIS MATTER initially came before the Court on Deshaune Harrigan’s (“Harrigan”) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that his parole eligibility date was being improperly calculated; that he was not being credited with the applicable good time credits; and that he would like to serve the remainder of his local sentence in the Virgin Islands. The Government moved to dismiss Harrigan’s § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because he is not in custody in the District of the Virgin Islands.1 Harrigan replied that as a 1 Petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined. United States v. Kennedy, 851 F.2d 689, 690 (3d Cir. 1988); United States v. Jack, 774 F.2d 605, 607 n.1 (3d Cir. 1985). A habeas petition is within a court’s jurisdiction when the court has jurisdiction over the petitioner’s immediate custodian. Padilla v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 426, 442-443 (2004); see also Yi v. Maugans, 24 F.3d 500, 503 (3d Cir. 1994) (finding that “[a] district court’s habeas jurisdiction is territorially limited and extends only to persons detained and custodial officials acting within the boundaries of that district.”); Parris v. Chavez, 199 Fed. App’x. 198, 199 (3d Cir. 2006) (noting that a district court’s dismissal without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction is proper when a § 2241 is filed in a judicial district that does not have jurisdiction over petitioner’s custodian). Case: 3:08-cv-00136-RLF-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 06/22/11 Page 1 of 3 Harrigan v. Hansen, et al. D.C. CV. NO. 2008-136 Order “state boarder”2 from the Virgin Islands, and not a “federal prisoner” he is under the constructive custody of the warden of Virgin Islands Bureau of Corrections. In its March 30, 2011 Order, the Court found: There is no question that Harrigan’s immediate custodian is the Warden at FCC Coleman, and the Court recognizes that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) is “solely responsible for calculating federal terms of imprisonment.” (Legal Resource Guide to the Federal Bureau of Prisons 2008 at 12.) However, it appears that the issue here centers more on who is responsible for calculating Harrigan’s local sentence (along with eligibility for parole and “good time” credits), than how his sentence is computed or executed. Therefore, the court construes Harrigan’s motion not as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, but rather as a motion seeking clarification given his “state boarder” status. (Order of Mar. 30, 2011 at 4.) The Court instructed the Government to file any objections to Harrigan’s March 17, 2011 Sentence Data Record prepared by the Virgin Islands Bureau of Corrections (“VIBOC”). To date, the Government has not objected to the VIBOC’s Sentence Data Record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Harrigan’s petition pursuant to § 2241 which the Court construes as a motion for clarification is GRANTED in part3 to allow for the calculation of his parole eligibility date and 2 A “state boarder” is a prisoner serving a state sentence in a federal institution under a contract between state and federal governments. See Taylor v. Armstrong, 38 Fed. App’x 337, 338 (7th Cir. 2002). 3 In its March 30, 2011 Order, the Court denied Harrigan’s request to serve the remainder of his local sentence in the Virgin Islands. Case: 3:08-cv-00136-RLF-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 06/22/11 Page 2 of 3 Harrigan v. Hansen, et al. D.C. CV. NO. 2008-136 Order applicable good time credits; and further ORDERED that the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED; and further ORDERED that Harrigan’s motion to show cause and expedite is DENIED as moot; and further ORDERED that the Virgin Islands Bureau of Corrections shall immediately transmit Harrigan’s current Sentence Data Record to FCI Coleman Low; and finally ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this file. DONE AND SO ORDERED this 22 day of June 2011. E N T E R: /s/ Raymond L. Finch ___________________________ RAYMOND L. FINCH SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Ruth Miller, Magistrate Judge Jason Cohen, AUSA Deshaune R. Harrigan #06038-094, Federal Correctional Institution, Coleman Low, P.O. Box 1031, Coleman, FL 33521-1031 (Please Mark: “LEGAL MAIL”) Virgin Islands Bureau of Corrections, Classifications Dept. (Attn: S. Dewese, E. Smithen) FCI Coleman Low, P.O. Box 1021, Coleman, FL 33521-1021 (Attn: Mr. Ebey, Case Manager) Case: 3:08-cv-00136-RLF-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 06/22/11 Page 3 of 3