Mark Vitalis, v. Sun Constructors, Inc.

Collection: Courts
Sub-shelf: District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind: Court Record
Date: 2010-08-25
Pages: 5
Text: Native Text

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00101/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00101-6.pdf

SHA-256 0562a061a7a471a1b75d70c9808d0d21bcc7756733038d82c6b376c38d91f72d

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-0562a061a7a4

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 IDONA WALLACE 5 1:02-cv-107 5 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION 5 __________________________________________5 5 ERROL STANLEY, NIGEL CHARLES, 5 1:03-cv-55 MELVIN NEAL, JOSEPH SONNY, 5 WRANDA DAVIS 5 5 v. 5 5 ST. CROIX BASIC SERVICES, INC., BASIC 5 INDUSTRIES, INC., HOVENSA, L.L.C., and 5 AMERADA HESS CORPORATION 5 __________________________________________5 5 FORREST THOMAS 5 1:03-cv-163 5 v. 5 5 CENTENNIAL COMMUNICATIONS 5 CORP., CENTENNIAL CARIBBEAN 5 HOLDING CORP., and CENTENNIAL 5 USVI OPERATIONS CORP. 5 __________________________________________5 5 MARK VITALIS, 5 1:05-cv-101 5 v. 5 5 SUN CONSTRUCTORS, INC., RICHARD 5 “DOC” LANGNER, and EXCEL GROUP, 5 INC. 5 __________________________________________5 Case: 1:05-cv-00101-WAL-EAH Document #: 658 Filed: 08/25/10 Page 1 of 5 Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc. 1:05-cv-101 Order Regarding Motion For Contempt 5 PATRICE CANTON 5 1:05-cv-143 5 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION 5 __________________________________________5 5 GLENFORD RAGGUETTE 5 1:06-cv-173 5 v. 5 5 PREMIER WINES AND SPIRITS, LTD. 5 __________________________________________5 5 TERRANCE ALEXIS 5 1:07-cv-91 5 v. 5 5 HOVENSA, L.L.C., and HESS f/k/a 5 Amerada Hess Corporation 5 __________________________________________5 5 HELEN JAMES-STEELE 5 1:04-CV-123 5 v. 5 5 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 5 __________________________________________5 TO: See attached distribution list ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AGAINST ATTORNEY ROHN FOR FAILING TO COMPLY TO [sic] THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED ON BEHALF OF SUN, LANGNER, AND EXCEL Case: 1:05-cv-00101-WAL-EAH Document #: 658 Filed: 08/25/10 Page 2 of 5 Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc. 1:05-cv-101 Order Regarding Motion For Contempt THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Motion For Contempt Against Attorney Rohn For Filing to Comply to [sic] the Subpoena duces tecum Issued on Behalf of Sun, Langner, and Excel (1:05-cv-101, Docket No. 627). Attorney Rohn filed a response in opposition to said motion, and Defendants Sun Constructors, Inc., Richard “Doc” Langner, and Excel Group, Inc., filed a reply (titled a response) thereto. Having reviewed the motion, opposition, and reply and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that said Defendants properly issued a subpoena to Attorney Rohn, that Attorney Rohn failed to comply with such subpoena, and that Attorney Rohn has provided no “adequate excuse” for her failure to comply. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(e). Consequently, the Court is authorized, pursuant to Rule 45, to hold Attorney Rohn and contempt. Based upon the foregoing, the Court will grant the motion and will impose sanctions against Attorney Rohn. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Motion For Contempt Against Attorney Rohn For Failing to Comply to [sic] the Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued on Behalf of Sun, Langner, and Excel (1:05- cv-101, Docket No. 627) is GRANTED. 2. Lee J. Rohn, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs, shall comply with the document requests contained in the subpoena duces tecum issued on behalf of Case: 1:05-cv-00101-WAL-EAH Document #: 658 Filed: 08/25/10 Page 3 of 5 Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc. 1:05-cv-101 Order Regarding Motion For Contempt Defendants Sun Constructors, Inc., Richard “Doc” Langner, and Excel Group, Inc., and deliver such documents to counsel for said Defendants on or before September 7, 2010. 3. Any documents Attorney Rohn deems “privileged” may be submitted, accompanied by a detailed privilege log, to the undersigned on or before September 7, 2010, for in camera review. 4. Attorney Rohn shall pay Defendants Sun Constructors, Inc., Richard “Doc” Langner, and Excel Group, Inc.’s reasonable costs and attorney’s fees associated with and related to the motion for contempt upon the Court’s approval of such amounts. 5. Counsel for Defendants Sun Constructors, Inc., Richard “Doc” Langner, and Excel Group, Inc., shall submit, within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order, an affidavit, declaration, or other certification detailing the costs and fees associated with and related to the motion for contempt. 6. Any failure by Attorney Rohn to produce the documents as ordered shall result in further sanctions. Case: 1:05-cv-00101-WAL-EAH Document #: 658 Filed: 08/25/10 Page 4 of 5 Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc. 1:05-cv-101 Order Regarding Motion For Contempt ENTER: Dated: August 25, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ECF: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Eugenio W.A. Geigel-Simounet, Esq. George H. Logan, Esq. Linda J. Blair, Esq. Simone R.D. Francis, Esq. David J. Cattie, Esq. Anna H. Paiewonsky, Esq. Stephanie L. Adler, Esq. Daryl C. Barnes, Esq. Case: 1:05-cv-00101-WAL-EAH Document #: 658 Filed: 08/25/10 Page 5 of 5