Liles, Carol v. Revetaw, Inc
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CAROL LILES, Plaintiff, v. REVETAW, INC., d/b/a WATER ISLAND FERRY, STEVE RAMPINO, and STEVE SCULLY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2003-88 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Carol Liles, Water Island, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff, James M. Derr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Steve Rampino, Steve Scully St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the renewed motion of defendant Steve Rampino (“Rampino”) for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Carol Liles (“Liles”). The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. S\ Curtis V. Gómez Chief Judge Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM Document #: 194 Filed: 07/07/09 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_03-cv-00088/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_03-cv-00088-5.pdf
SHA-256 05c8ea23e0446ed9e18d17eb04fede14d98ab3a63a37a24be25878abe4a64a60
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-05c8ea23e044
Document text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CAROL LILES, Plaintiff, v. REVETAW, INC., d/b/a WATER ISLAND FERRY, STEVE RAMPINO, and STEVE SCULLY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2003-88 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Carol Liles, Water Island, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff, James M. Derr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Steve Rampino, Steve Scully St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the renewed motion of defendant Steve Rampino (“Rampino”) for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Carol Liles (“Liles”). The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. S\ Curtis V. Gómez Chief Judge Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM Document #: 194 Filed: 07/07/09 Page 1 of 1