Dysart, Tami Allison/Appellee v. Dysart, Robert Lewis/Appellant
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN APPELLATE DIVISION TAMI ALLISON DYSART, ) ) Appellant, ) )D.C. Civ. App. Nos.:2005/131 & 132 ) v. )Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No.: 196/2001 ) ROBERT LEWIS DYSART, ) ) Appellee. ) ) ATTORNEYS: Darwin K. Carr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the appellant. Robert L. Dysart, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. The Court, upon consideration of the February 20, 2008, Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections have been filed; and after an independent and de novo review of the record, hereby approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Case: 3:05-cv-00132-CVA Document #: 22 Filed: 08/04/08 Page 1 of 2 Dysart v. Dysart Civ. App. Nos. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_05-cv-00132/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_05-cv-00132-0.pdf
SHA-256 0e3983713f1403b97c043c9afbfd8650401fb2d67ada0660ecbdbdd7614383de
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-0e3983713f14
Document text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN APPELLATE DIVISION TAMI ALLISON DYSART, ) ) Appellant, ) )D.C. Civ. App. Nos.:2005/131 & 132 ) v. )Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No.: 196/2001 ) ROBERT LEWIS DYSART, ) ) Appellee. ) ) ATTORNEYS: Darwin K. Carr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the appellant. Robert L. Dysart, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. The Court, upon consideration of the February 20, 2008, Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections have been filed; and after an independent and de novo review of the record, hereby approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Case: 3:05-cv-00132-CVA Document #: 22 Filed: 08/04/08 Page 1 of 2 Dysart v. Dysart Civ. App. Nos. 2005-131, 2005-132 Order Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to enforce interlocutory orders is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that the appellant’s emergency motion for an order directing deposit of funds with the Clerk of the Court is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the appellant’s emergency motion to show cause is DENIED. For the Court: s/ Curtis V. Gómez Chief Judge Case: 3:05-cv-00132-CVA Document #: 22 Filed: 08/04/08 Page 2 of 2