KPI Spring 2006
1 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Mid-Year Report University of the Virgin Islands Board of Trustees Meeting March 11, 2006 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research and Planning 2 Spring 2006 – Mid-Year Report Key Performance Indicators Spring Enrollment Financial Research Development Facilities 3 Enrollment Indicators Spring 2006 4 Enrollment Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 1,168 1,157 1,122 1,339 1,435 1,297 2,592 2,419 2,507 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2004 2005 2006 Full-Time Part-Time Total 4% Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 4% FT for Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 3% PT for Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 Full vs. Part time Ratio 2006: 1:1.16 2005: 1:1.15 2004: 1:1.24 5 Fall to Spring Enrollment AY 2003-04 to 2005-06 279 279 213 231 207 233 2436 2313 2352 2276 2185 2186 Fall 2003 Sp 2004 Fall 2004 Sp 2005 Fall 2005 Sp 2006 Graduates Undergraduate Spring 2006 vs. Fall 2005 1% from Fall 2005 Spring 2005 vs. Fall 2004 2% from Fall 2004 Spring 2004 vs. Fall 2003 5% from Fall 2003 2,419 2,392 2,507 2,565 2,592 2,715 6 FTE – Enrollment Spring 2006 vs. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.uvi.edu/files/documents/Institutional_Research_and_Planning/KPIs/KPI%20Spring_2006.pdf
SHA-256 11a8cadffe744cfa41e94fa3a2206dc37a6069ec8f16238fe797416ffcab35ee
Re-using this document
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-11a8cadffe74
Document text
1 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Mid-Year Report University of the Virgin Islands Board of Trustees Meeting March 11, 2006 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research and Planning 2 Spring 2006 – Mid-Year Report Key Performance Indicators Spring Enrollment Financial Research Development Facilities 3 Enrollment Indicators Spring 2006 4 Enrollment Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 1,168 1,157 1,122 1,339 1,435 1,297 2,592 2,419 2,507 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2004 2005 2006 Full-Time Part-Time Total 4% Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 4% FT for Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 3% PT for Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 Full vs. Part time Ratio 2006: 1:1.16 2005: 1:1.15 2004: 1:1.24 5 Fall to Spring Enrollment AY 2003-04 to 2005-06 279 279 213 231 207 233 2436 2313 2352 2276 2185 2186 Fall 2003 Sp 2004 Fall 2004 Sp 2005 Fall 2005 Sp 2006 Graduates Undergraduate Spring 2006 vs. Fall 2005 1% from Fall 2005 Spring 2005 vs. Fall 2004 2% from Fall 2004 Spring 2004 vs. Fall 2003 5% from Fall 2003 2,419 2,392 2,507 2,565 2,592 2,715 6 FTE – Enrollment Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 Total FTE Spring 2006 3% vs. Spring 2005 Undergraduate FTE (12hrs) 3% vs. Spring 2005 Graduate FTE (9hrs) 1% vs. Spring 2005 157 137 138 1,940 1,857 1,917 1,994 2,055 2,097 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2004 2005 2006 Graduate FTE Ugrad FTE Total FTE 7 Credit Hour Production Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 1,237 1,243 1,417 23,281 23,006 22,283 24,698 24,249 23,520 0 7,000 14,000 21,000 28,000 2004 2005 2006 Graduate UG Total ■Credit Hours for Spring 2006 3% from Spring 2005 Undergraduate 3% St Croix 0% St Thomas 5% Graduate 1% St Croix 3% St Thomas 3% St Thomas Campus: St. Thomas + BVI + Distance Learning 8 New Student Enrollment Spring 2006 vs. Spring 2005 465 392 445 307 257 309 215 169 213 0 250 500 2004 2005 2006 Apps Accepted Enrolled Enrolled v. Acceptance Ratio/ Yield 2006: 1:1.43 / 70% Yield 2005: 1:1.52 / 66% Yield 2004: 1:1.45 / 69% Yield New Freshmen for Spring 2006 11% from Spring 2005 Transfers for Spring 2006 10 % from Spring 2005 9 Financial Indicators 10 VI Operating Appropriations 18.1 24.5 24.6 23.2 23.2 $0 $10 $20 $30 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Millions FY Annual Appropriations ■Appropriations stable over 2004-2005 11 Total Operating Budget 37.9 36.2 35.3 35.7 30.1 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Millions FY Annual Budget ■ 5% from 2004 ■Peers Comparison* UVI ranked: 2004 - #6 2003 - #8 2002 - #6 (*based on subset) 12 Percentage of VI Appropriations to Operating Budget 61% 64% 70% 69% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Percent ■ 3% from 2004 Auxiliary funds + increases in tuition/fees make up the difference for the decline in VI support. 13 Percentage of Tuition & Fees to Total Operating Budget 23 23 21 20 21 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Percent ■Stable over 2004-2005 14 Research Indicators 15 Externally Funded Grants and Contracts Awards (Includes Federal and Local) Grants and Contracts * 36% from 2004 Peer Comparisons Local Grants & Contracts UVI ranked: 2004 - #1 Federal Grants & Contracts UVI ranked: 2004 - #5 14 9 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 2004 2005 Millions * The total amount of grants and contracts are reported in the fiscal year in which they are received regardless of the number of years covered. 16 Development 17 Annual Fund Contributions FY 04 – 06 Quarterly Report 1,190 1,005 1,350 561 335 1,500 . Annual Fund Year-to-date Total Received 05-06 03-04 04-05 Oct 2005 to Jan 2006 $1,349,939 303% over 04-05 2006 Target * * $818,000 of funds come from a special capital gift. 18 Alumni Contributions FY 04 – 06 Quarterly Report 26,031 19,436 24,018 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 Giving Amount Oct. 2005 – Jan. 2006 Average Gift ($375) 43 % over 04-05 $24,018 Total Contribution 24 % over 04-05 Alumni = 64 Sept. 2004 – Feb. 2005 Average Gift = ($262) $19,4361 Total Contribution 25% over 03-04 Alumni = 74 05-06 03-04 04-05 19 % Trustees Who Contribute FY 04 – 06 Quarterly Report 40% 50% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Giving Oct. 2005 – Jan. 2006 18% Giving, $7,500 6/15 or 40% Avg. = $1,250 Sept. 2004 – Jan. 2005 Giving, $9,148 7/14 or 50% Avg. = $1,307 05-06 03-04 04-05 20 Endowment Market Value 24.7 26.1 23.4 $0 $10 $20 $30 2003 2004 2005 Millions UVI Endowment 5% from 2004 Includes: Reichhold Foundation The University of the Virgin Islands Foundation Peer Comparison UVI ranked: 2004 - #1 2003 - #1 21 Facilities 22 Facilities Maintenance* Volume of Deferred Maintenance 1999 - $27M 2001 - $17M 2005 - $ 7M Physical Condition of Facilities Classrooms 1999 – Poor 2005 – Very Good Physical Condition of Facilities Faculty Offices 1999 – Fair 2005 – Good Dormitories 1999 – Poor/Fair 2005 – Very Good Assembly Halls/Grounds 1999 – Fair 2005 – Very Good ** Faculty/Admin Residences 1999 – Fair 2005 – Excellent *Based on 1999 Facilities Needs Assessment 23 Thank You! Office of Institutional Research and Planning