VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Peterson, Patrick v. Virgin Islands Medical and Cora Christian, MD

Collection
Historical Records
Sub-shelf
Internet Archive (V.I. texts)
Kind
Historical Record
Island
St. Croix
Date
2007-07-17
Pages
1
Text
Native Text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PATRICK PETERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. 2003/0194 ) VIRGIN ISLANDS MEDICAL INSTITUTE ) (PRSO) INC., and ) CORA L.E. CHRISTIAN, M.D., M.P.A. ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider (Docket No. 53). Upon careful review and consideration and the Court being fully advised in the premises therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider is DENIED. ENTER: DATED: July 17, 2007 /s/ Raymond L. Finch______________ RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case: 1:03-cv-00194-TJS-GWC Document #: 63 Filed: 07/17/07 Page 1 of 1

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.vid.10096/gov.uscourts.vid.10096.63.0.pdf

SHA-256 14863596065d88438ff1580c1c7e0db17458d7613676b6171b17582ad6963874

Re-using this document

mixed and recorded per item: public domain by age or as a US government work for what was taken; controlled-digital-lending and restrictively licensed items EXCLUDED, each listed with its reason

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-14863596065d

Document text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PATRICK PETERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. 2003/0194 ) VIRGIN ISLANDS MEDICAL INSTITUTE ) (PRSO) INC., and ) CORA L.E. CHRISTIAN, M.D., M.P.A. ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider (Docket No. 53). Upon careful review and consideration and the Court being fully advised in the premises therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider is DENIED. ENTER: DATED: July 17, 2007 /s/ Raymond L. Finch______________ RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case: 1:03-cv-00194-TJS-GWC Document #: 63 Filed: 07/17/07 Page 1 of 1