Frank C. Pollara Group, LLC v. Southgate Crossing Investments, LLC
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 FRANK C. POLLARA GROUP, L.L.C., 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:09-cv-60 v. 5 5 SOUTHGATE CROSSING INVESTMENTS, 5 L.L.C., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: K. Glenda Cameron, Esq. Andrew C. Simpson, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Prosecute (Docket No. 25). Plaintiff filed a response thereto. The motion was 1 discussed with the Court at the status conference held on May 27, 2010, wherein the parties stipulated to the undersigned ruling upon said motion. The record reveals that Plaintiff has retained counsel who has filed a notice of appearance on Plaintiff’s behalf. Although the notice was filed three days after the 1. Plaintiff’s response was incorrectly designated as a motion when filed in the ECF system. The Court will terminate this document when entering this order. Case: 1:09-cv-00060-DWA Document #: 30 Filed: 05/27/10 Page 1 of 2 Frank C. Pollara Group, L.L.C. v. Southgate Crossing Investments, L.L.C. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_09-cv-00060/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_09-cv-00060-0.pdf
SHA-256 17ddc451de46581c9632ef791cedf31c0a5a97a982efd9c5166b5abfc162800e
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-17ddc451de46
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 FRANK C. POLLARA GROUP, L.L.C., 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:09-cv-60 v. 5 5 SOUTHGATE CROSSING INVESTMENTS, 5 L.L.C., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: K. Glenda Cameron, Esq. Andrew C. Simpson, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Prosecute (Docket No. 25). Plaintiff filed a response thereto. The motion was 1 discussed with the Court at the status conference held on May 27, 2010, wherein the parties stipulated to the undersigned ruling upon said motion. The record reveals that Plaintiff has retained counsel who has filed a notice of appearance on Plaintiff’s behalf. Although the notice was filed three days after the 1. Plaintiff’s response was incorrectly designated as a motion when filed in the ECF system. The Court will terminate this document when entering this order. Case: 1:09-cv-00060-DWA Document #: 30 Filed: 05/27/10 Page 1 of 2 Frank C. Pollara Group, L.L.C. v. Southgate Crossing Investments, L.L.C. 1:09-cv-60 Order deadline, the Court finds that the delay was minimal and had no prejudicial effect upon Defendant. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Prosecute (Docket No. 25) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: May 27, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:09-cv-00060-DWA Document #: 30 Filed: 05/27/10 Page 2 of 2