USVI Public Records

Document text

64556 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 1997 / Notices Summary of Collection: Information is collected from respondents for appointing committee members, conducting referendums, and requesting waivers for inspection. Need and Use of the Information: The information is used to administer Marketing Order 922. Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 430. Frequency of Responses: Recordkeeping; Reporting: On occasion; Biennially. Total Burden Hours: 39. Donald Hulcher, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 97–32032 Filed 12–5–97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–01–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Consumer Service RIN 0584–AC58 Food Stamp Program: Maximum Allotments for Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the Virgin Islands AGENCY: Food and Consumer Service, USDA. ACTION: General notice. SUMMARY: By this notice, the Department of Agriculture is updating for Fiscal Year 1998 the maximum food stamp allotments for participating households in Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. These annual adjustments, required by law, take into account changes in the cost of food and statutory adjustments since the amounts were last calculated. EFFECTIVE DATE: This notice is effective December 8, 1997. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Werts Batko, Assistant Branch Chief, Certification Policy Branch, Program Development Division, Food and Consumer Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, or telephone at (703) 305–2516. The e-mail address is MargaretlBatko@FCS.USDA.GOV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Implementation As required by Section 3(o) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (the Act), 7 U.S.C. 2012 (o), State agencies should have implemented this action on October 1, 1997, based on advance notice of the new amounts. As required by regulations published at 47 FR 46485 (October 19, 1982), annual statutory adjustments to the maximum allotment levels and income eligibility standards are issued by General Notices published in the Federal Register and not through rulemaking proceedings. Executive Order 12866 This notice has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Executive Order 12372 The Food Stamp Program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.551. For the reasons set forth in the Final rule and related notice to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V (48 FR 29916, June 24, 1983), this program is excluded from the scope of Executive Order No. 12372 which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services has certified that this action will not have a significant economic impact and will not have an impact on a substantial number of small entities. The action will increase the amount of money spent on food through increases in food stamp benefits. However, this money will be distributed among all eligible food stamp vendors, so the effect on any one vendor will not be significant. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not contain reporting or record keeping requirements subject to review by OMB pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507. Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) Title II of UMRA establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA, FCS generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires FCS to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost- effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This notice contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus today’s rule is not subject to the requirements of Sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. Background Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) and Allotments As provided for in Section 3(o) of the Act, the TFP is a plan for the consumption of foods of different types (food groups) that families might use to provide nutritious meals and snacks for family members. The plan provides for a diet required to feed a family of four persons consisting of a man and woman aged 20 to 50, a child 6 to 8 and a child 9 to 11. The cost of the TFP is adjusted monthly to reflect changes in the costs of the food groups. The TFPs for Alaska and Hawaii are based on an adjusted average for the six- month period that ends with June 1997. Since the Bureau of Labor Statistics (the source of food price data) no longer publishes monthly information to compute Alaska and Hawaii TFPs, the adjusted average provides a proxy for actual June 1997 TFP costs. The adjusted average is equal to January- June 1997 TFP costs for Alaska and Hawaii increased by the average percentage difference between the cost of the TFP in Alaska and Hawaii in June and the January-June average in 1986 (a 1.53 percent increase over January-June costs in Alaska and 1.82 percent increase in Hawaii). For the period January through June 1997, the average cost of the TFP was $502.90 in Alaska, and $645.50 in Hawaii. The proxy in Alaska for actual June 1997 TFP costs was $510.59. This proxy is multiplied by three separate adjustment factors to create three TFPs for Urban Alaska, Rural I Alaska, and Rural II Alaska. The proxy in Hawaii for actual June 1997 TFP costs was $657.24. The June 1997 cost of the TFP was $602.20 in Guam and $525.30 in the Virgin Islands. The maximum food stamp allotment is paid to households that have no net income. For households with some type of income, their allotments are determined by reducing the maximum allotment for their household size by 30 percent of the household’s net income in accordance with Section 8 (a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 2017 (a). To obtain the maximum food stamp allotment for each household size, the TFP costs are divided by four, multiplied by the appropriate household size and economy of scale factor, and the final result rounded down to the nearest dollar. 64557 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 1997 / Notices Pursuant to Section 3 (o) (3) of the Act, maximum food stamp benefits for Guam and the Virgin Islands cannot exceed those in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, so they are based upon either the lower of their respective TFPs or the TFP for rural II Alaska. MAXIMUM ALLOTMENT AMOUNTS 1—OCTOBER 1997, AS ADJUSTED Household Size Urban Alaska Rural I Alaska Rural II Alaska Hawaii Guam 2 Virgin Islands 2 1 ........................................................................................ $154 $196 $239 $197 $180 $157 2 ........................................................................................ 283 360 439 361 331 288 3 ........................................................................................ 405 516 628 517 474 413 4 ........................................................................................ 514 656 798 657 602 525 5 ........................................................................................ 611 779 948 780 715 623 6 ........................................................................................ 733 935 1,138 936 858 748 7 ........................................................................................ 810 1,033 1,257 1,035 948 827 8 ........................................................................................ 926 1,181 1,437 1,183 1,083 945 Each Additional Member ................................................... +116 +148 +180 +148 +135 +118 1 Adjusted to reflect the cost of food in June, adjustments for each household size, economies of scale, and 1.00 percent of the TFP and rounding. 2 Adjusted to reflect changes in the cost of food in the 48 States and D.C., which correlate with price changes in these areas. Maximum allot- ments in these areas cannot exceed those in Rural II Alaska. Dated: November 17, 1997. Yvette S. Jackson, Administrator, Food and Consumer Services. [FR Doc. 97–31973 Filed 12–5–97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–U DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food And Consumer Service RIN 0584–AC57 Food Stamp Program: Maximum Allotments for the 48 States and the District of Columbia, and Income Eligibility Standards for the 48 States and the District of Columbia, Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the Virgin Islands AGENCY: Food and Consumer Service, USDA. ACTION: General notice. SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to update for Fiscal Year 1998 the maximum allotment levels, which are the basis for determining the amount of food stamps which participating households receive and the gross and net income limits for food stamp eligibility. These adjustments, required by law, take into account changes in the cost of living and statutory adjustments since the amounts were last calculated. DATES: This notice is effective December 8, 1997. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Werts Batko, Assistant Chief, Certification Policy Branch, Program Development Division, Food Stamp Program, Food and Consumer Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302, (703) 305– 2516. The e-mail address is MargaretlBatko@FCS.USDA.GOV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Implementation As required by Section 3(o) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (the Act), 7 U.S.C. 2012(o), State agencies should have implemented the adjustments to the maximum food stamp allotments reflected in this notice on October 1, 1997, based on advance notice of the new amounts. In accordance with regulations published at 47 FR 46485– 46487 (October 19, 1982), annual statutory adjustments to the maximum allotment levels and income eligibility standards are issued by general notices published in the Federal Register and not through rulemaking proceedings. Classification Executive Order 12866 This notice has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Executive Order 12372 The Food Stamp Program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.551. For the reasons set forth in the final rule related notice to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V (48 FR 29116, June 24, 1983), this program is excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372 which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services has certified that this action will not have a significant economic impact and will not have an impact on a substantial number of small entities. The action will increase the amount of money spent on food through food stamps. However, this money will be distributed among the nation’s food vendors, so the effect on any one vendor will not be significant. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not contain reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to approval by OMB pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507. Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) Title II of UMRA establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA, FCS generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, Section 205 of the UMRA generally requires FCS to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost- effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This notice contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.