Williams,Corden v. Virgin Islands Telelephone Corporation Innovative Communication Corporation
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 CORDEN WILLIAMS, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0127 v. 5 5 VIRGIN ISLANDS TELEPHONE 5 CORPORATION (VITELCO) and 5 INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION 5 CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Kevin A. Rames, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 30) and Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31). The time for filing a response has expired. A review of the record reflects that by text-entry only Order (Docket No. 22), the Court granted Defendant Innovative Communication Corporation’s Motion For Commencement of Action Under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code; Automatic Stay (Docket No. 13) and Plaintiff’s motions to sever Defendant Innovative Case: 1:06-cv-00127-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 1 of 3 Williams v. VITELCO 2006-CV-0127 Order 1. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00127/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00127-1.pdf
SHA-256 1ac1170e81abe95ff1f78223b8475876a656bc11822a72eaf96da6b5d6d01ce0
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-1ac1170e81ab
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 CORDEN WILLIAMS, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0127 v. 5 5 VIRGIN ISLANDS TELEPHONE 5 CORPORATION (VITELCO) and 5 INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION 5 CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Kevin A. Rames, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 30) and Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31). The time for filing a response has expired. A review of the record reflects that by text-entry only Order (Docket No. 22), the Court granted Defendant Innovative Communication Corporation’s Motion For Commencement of Action Under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code; Automatic Stay (Docket No. 13) and Plaintiff’s motions to sever Defendant Innovative Case: 1:06-cv-00127-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 1 of 3 Williams v. VITELCO 2006-CV-0127 Order 1. The motion and proposed amended answer also purport to be filed on behalf of Defendant David Sharp. The Court is unaware of any such defendant in this matter. Communication Corporation (Docket No. 18). Thereafter, Defendants filed a Motion to Amend Answer (Docket No. 26) and an Amended Answer (Docket No. 27). Despite the title of Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider (Docket No. 31), the record is void of any order allowing amendment. Consequently, the Court will deny said motion as moot. However, because the Motion to Amend Answer and Amended Answer were filed on behalf of both Defendants , the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to strike the motion and amended 1 answer. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31) is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. Defendants’ Motion to Amend Answer (Docket No. 26) and Amended Answer (Docket No. 27) are STRICKEN. Case: 1:06-cv-00127-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 2 of 3 Williams v. VITELCO 2006-CV-0127 Order ENTER: Dated: March 19, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cv-00127-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 3 of 3