VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. RITTER et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Island
St. Croix
Date
2008-09-12
Pages
3
Text
Native Text
Identifiers
2008-CR-0005

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2008-CR-0005-01 v. 5 5 REGGIE RITTER, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., AUSA Emile A. Henderson, III, Esq. Eric S. Chancellor, Esq. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT REGGIE RITTER’S MOTION FOR SEVERANCE THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing September 12, 2008, upon Defendant Reggie Ritter’s Motion For Severance (Docket No. 57). The government was represented by Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., AUSA; Emile A. Henderson, III, Esq., appeared on behalf of said Defendant, and Defendant also appeared. Having reviewed the said motion, the government’s opposition thereto, and heard oral arguments of counsel and being advised in the premises and upon due consideration thereof, the Court will deny the said motion. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00005/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00005-1.pdf

SHA-256 1b168798de0aa94dfbb0d14d7583ceab608943e634266ed70a548823705902d2

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-1b168798de0a

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2008-CR-0005-01 v. 5 5 REGGIE RITTER, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., AUSA Emile A. Henderson, III, Esq. Eric S. Chancellor, Esq. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT REGGIE RITTER’S MOTION FOR SEVERANCE THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing September 12, 2008, upon Defendant Reggie Ritter’s Motion For Severance (Docket No. 57). The government was represented by Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., AUSA; Emile A. Henderson, III, Esq., appeared on behalf of said Defendant, and Defendant also appeared. Having reviewed the said motion, the government’s opposition thereto, and heard oral arguments of counsel and being advised in the premises and upon due consideration thereof, the Court will deny the said motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, while reviewing a Virgin Islands case, recently cited with approval the standard articulated by the Fourth Circuit to Case: 1:08-cr-00005-RLF-GWC Document #: 67 Filed: 09/12/08 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Ritter 2008-CR-0005-01 Order Denying Defendant Reggie Ritter’s Motion For Severance be applied when a defendant moves for severance based upon the need for a co- defendant’s testimony, stating that the moving defendant must establish four things: (1) a bona fide need for the testimony of his co-defendant; (2) the likelihood that the co-defendant would testify at a second trial and waive his Fifth Amendment privilege; (3) the substance of his co-defendant's testimony; and (4) the exculpatory nature and effect of such testimony. United States v. Bates, 46 Fed. Appx. 104, 109 n.3 (3d Cir. 2002) (citing United States v. Parodi, 703 F.2d 768, 779 (4 Cir. 1983). The Court finds that Defendant Reggie Ritter has failed to th establish the second, third, and fourth enumerated elements. When questioned by the Court, counsel for Defendant Reggie Ritter admitted that he had not personally interviewed co-Defendant Ernie Ritter and, therefore, could not assure the Court of the likelihood that Ernie Ritter would waive his Fifth Amendment privilege nor provide the Court with the substance of Ernie Ritter’s testimony and its exculpatory nature. Consequently, Defendant Reggie Ritter has failed to overcome the principle of judicial economy. WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED that Defendant Reggie Ritter’s Motion For Severance (Docket No. 57) is DENIED. Case: 1:08-cr-00005-RLF-GWC Document #: 67 Filed: 09/12/08 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Ritter 2008-CR-0005-01 Order Denying Defendant Reggie Ritter’s Motion For Severance ENTER: Dated: September 12, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cr-00005-RLF-GWC Document #: 67 Filed: 09/12/08 Page 3 of 3