BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA v. Dean et al
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, ) ) Civil No. 2011-64 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ANDREA DEAN, "JOHN DOE" being the unknown heirs of JAMES J. DEAN holding interest in Parcel No. 6-6 Estate Contant, No. 2 Cruz Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, TROPICAL BREEZE DEVELOPMENT, LLC and WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's Emergency Motion for the Appointment of a Receiver [DE 89] for the real property described as Parcel No. 6-6 Estate Contant, No. 2 Cruz Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands as shown on PWD No. B9-451-T75 ("the Property"). Plaintiff seeks the appointment of a receiver based on the provision in the First Priority Mortgage Assignment of Leases and Rents and Construction Security Interest (the "First Priority Mortgage") that provides for the appointment of a receiver in the event of default and a subsequent foreclosure action. Pl.'s Mot., Ex. 1, Sec. 16 [DE 89-1 at 6]. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_11-cv-00064/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_11-cv-00064-3.pdf
SHA-256 1dc45f04b3e939703e1585a49cad651eb325661e64d7285a31c4b2afd5f74ad3
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-1dc45f04b3e9
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, ) ) Civil No. 2011-64 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ANDREA DEAN, "JOHN DOE" being the unknown heirs of JAMES J. DEAN holding interest in Parcel No. 6-6 Estate Contant, No. 2 Cruz Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, TROPICAL BREEZE DEVELOPMENT, LLC and WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's Emergency Motion for the Appointment of a Receiver [DE 89] for the real property described as Parcel No. 6-6 Estate Contant, No. 2 Cruz Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands as shown on PWD No. B9-451-T75 ("the Property"). Plaintiff seeks the appointment of a receiver based on the provision in the First Priority Mortgage Assignment of Leases and Rents and Construction Security Interest (the "First Priority Mortgage") that provides for the appointment of a receiver in the event of default and a subsequent foreclosure action. Pl.'s Mot., Ex. 1, Sec. 16 [DE 89-1 at 6]. This diversity suit is a residential foreclosure action. Plaintiff advises that an incomplete structure is situated on the Property. Plaintiff maintains that because construction is unfinished, a "danger of waste" is a concern, specifically the "potential for vandalism, theft and exposure to the elements." Accordingly, plaintiff requests the appointment of a receiver to "preserve" the Property and "prevent further waste." Case: 3:11-cv-00064-CVG-RM Document #: 90 Filed: 09/26/14 Page 1 of 2 Bank of Nova Scotia v. Dean, et al. Civil No. 2011-64 "[T]he intended purpose of the receiver . . . is to preserve and maintain the [property] site during the pendency of [] litigation, to preserve the value of the security, and to ensure that the laws and regulations of the U.S. Virgin Islands are fully complied with." First Am. Dev. Group/Carib, LLC v. WestLB AG, 53 V.I. 107, 130 (Super. Ct. 2010). The appointment of a receiver is considered "an equitable remedy of rather drastic nature available at the discretion of the Court." Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Patock, 51 V.I. 917, 928 (D.V.I. 2009) (quoting Nat'l Investors Pension Ins. Co., 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24701, at *5 (D.V.I. 1984)). The following factors guide the Court in its exercise of discretion: "(1) whether the security is adequate to cover the debt, (2) whether the mortgagor is insolvent, (3) whether there exists in the mortgage instrument a pledge of rent[s] and profits to the mortgagee, (4) whether waste has been committed, or (5) whether the security is endangered by nonpayment of taxes." Nat'l Investors Pension Ins. Co., 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24701, at *6 (alteration added). These factors should be considered along with any contractual provision authorizing a receiver's appointment. Id. Here, plaintiff relies exclusively on the provision in the First Priority Mortgage and fails to address the relevant factors. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion [DE 89] is denied without prejudice. See, e.g., Patock, 51 V.I. at 929 (refusing to appoint a receiver where plaintiff "ma[de] no attempt to establish any of the five factors" identified in National Investors). Dated: September 26, 2014 S\___________________________ RUTH MILLER United States Magistrate Judge Case: 3:11-cv-00064-CVG-RM Document #: 90 Filed: 09/26/14 Page 2 of 2