USVI Public Records

Document text

SOIL REMEDIATION REPORT O'HENRY LAUNDRY, TUTU, ST. THOMAS U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Prepared for: L'Henri, Inc. St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Prepared by: IT Corporation Knoxville, Tennessee IT Project No. 409830 Revision No. 1 August 1995 TUT OO7 2474 *65027* 65027 /*f*^^\ Soil Remediation Report O'Henry Laundry, Tutu, St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project No. 409830 Prepared for: L'Henri, Inc. St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands Prepared by: IT Corporation Knoxville, Tennessee f—, V< Belinda K. Price, Project Manager FT Corporation Revision No. 1 August 1995 KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/08-31-95(10:48«m)yDl/NE Table of Contents. Page List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Acronyms .................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction .................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Previous Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1.2 Soil Cleanup L e v e l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.2 Report Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 2.0 Field Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Soil Boring Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2 Soil Excavation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.2.2 Field Quality Control Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.2.3 Field Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2.2.4 Backfilling of Excavation Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 2.3 Soil Venting Pile Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 2.4 Equipment Decontamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 2.5 Investigation-Derived Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 2.6 Variances from the Approved Work Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 3.0 Soil Analytical Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.1 Field Screening Analytical Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.2 Confirmation Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3.3 Evaluation of Field Screening and Laboratory Analytical Results .......... 3-3 3.4 Geotechnical Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 4.0 Soil Remediation Progress Sampling and Operations and Maintenance of Soil Venting Pile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 Quarterly Soil Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.2 Operations and Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2 KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/0»-31-95(10:48«nVDl/NE Table of Contents (Continued^ 5.0 6.0 7.0 Page Evaluation of Impact to Groundwater of Soils Left in Place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6.1 Conclusions .............................................. 6-1 6.2 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 Appendix A - Appendix B - Appendix C - Appendix D - Visual Classification of Soils - Boring Logs Field Gas Chromatograph Screening Activities Variance Logs Validated Analytical Results Geotechnical Testing Results Photographs of the Soil Excavation Process and Soil Venting Pile Construction Process Technical Review Comments and Replies VLEACH Model Files KN/3018/WP3018.TXr/Q8-31-95(10:48«n)/DlJNE 11 List of Tables. Number Title Follows Page 2-1 Summary of Site Remediation Analytical Sampling 2-2 2-2 Summary of Organic Vapor Readings 2-4 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results 3-1 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results 3-2 3-3 Summary of EPA Split Sample Results 3-3 3-4 Comparison of Field GC and Laboratory PCE Results in Jig/kg 3-3 5-1 Concentration Profile Used in me VLEACH Model 5-1 5-2 VLEACH Model Results - Highest Groundwater PCE Concentrations and Time of Peak Impact 5-2 List of Figures. Number Titie Follows Page 1-1 Site Location Map 1-1 2-1 Soil Excavation and Soil Venting Pile Locations 2-1 2-2 Excavation Site Plan and Soil Boring Location 2-1 2-3 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 1-2 foot Depth 2-2 2-4 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 3-4 feet Depth 2-2 2-5 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 6-7 feet Depth 2-2 2-6 PCE Concentrations Beneath Excavation 2-2 2-7 PCE Concentrations in Excavation Walls 2-2 2-8 As-Built Soil Venting Pile 2-5 5-1 Predicted Groundwater Lnpact-foc = 0.006 (Area under excavation) 5-2 5-2 Predicted Groundwater Lnpact-foc = 0.006 (Area under paved concrete) 5-2 TUT OO7 ?, KN/301g/WP301S.TXT/D8-31-9S(12£5pmyD!2/NE 111 ' List of Acronyms- ASTM American Society for Testing and Material CDM Camp, Dresser, McKee Federal Programs Corporation CLP Contract Laboratory Program cm/s centimeter(s) per second DOT U.S. Department of Transportation DPNR Department of Planning and Natural Resources EM Engineering Manual EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FOC fraction organic carbon FOM fraction organic material ft3 cubic foot; cubic feet GC gas chromatography IT IT Corporation jig/kg micrograms per kilogram mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mL m£Qiliter(s) PCE tetrachloroetnane pcf pounds per cubic foot PID photoionization detector ppb parts per billion PRG preliminary remediation goal psi pounds per square inch QC quality control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SOW Statement of Work TOC total organic carbon USCS Unified Soil Qassification System USVI U.S. Virgin Islands VOC volatile organic compound KN/3OlS/WP3018.TXT/08-3I-95(ld2pinVD2/NE IV TUT OO7 -?•-= 1.0 Introduction The O'Henry Laundry is located on Highway 38, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). The site is subject to an on-going remedial investigation/feasibility study which is being performed by others on an area wide basis. The origin of PCE and other volatile organic compounds (VOC) in groundwater beneath this and other properties in the Tutu area has yet to be determined Contaminants, principally tetrachloroethane (PCE), have been detected in subsurface soils adjacent to the laundry. On behalf of L'Henri Inc., IT Corporation (IT) performed an evaluation of PCE in soil and determined that soil remediation was warranted in order to protect further degradation of groundwater in the vicinity of the laundry. Subsequent to that determination, L'Henri Inc. requested permission from the EPA to perform soil remediation. Between March 6 and 17, 1995, soil remediation efforts were conducted at the site. Soil remediation activities were conducted in accordance with the work plan prepared by IT (1994) approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region n and in conformance with a consent order between L'Henri Inc. and EPA signed March 1, 1995. EPA personnel performed oversight of the soil remediation activities and collected split samples as described in this report. The USVI Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) personnel visited the site during the soil removal efforts. This report addresses remediation of PCE in vadose zone soil in an area immediately adjacent to the southwest side of the O'Henry Laundry (Figure 1-1). Approximately 700 cubic feet (ft3) of soil containing PCE was excavated and a soil venting pile was constructed at a secure area adjacent to the site. The objective of the soil remediation was to reduce the human health risk and the potential for shallow groundwater contamination resulting from known soil contamination. 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Previous Investigations A surface soil sample, e-01 (approximately at soil boring location SS1 on Figure 1-1), was collected by Camp, Dresser, McKee Federal Programs Corporation (CDM) from a location near the south-west comer of O'Henry Laundry in September 1988. Analytical results indicated the presence of "tetrachloroethane" at a concentration of 440 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). In June 1989, three soil samples were collected by CDM from the same KN/»18/WP»18.TXTA*-31-95(l(MStm)/Dl/NE 1-1 !u i UO/ 2431 HIGHWAY 38 MW02• MW01 HARVEY WELL O MW04• a SB10 MW03 • Approximate Scale: (feet) 25 50 Legend • Existing Monitor Well 01 Existing Soil Boring O Water Well FIGURE 1-1 SITE LOCATION MAP O'HENRY LAUNDRY ST. THOMAS U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION STTHOMAS\SITEM AP.DRW/lj/5.10-95 /*-X location as e-01 at different depth intervals. Samples e-02-03, e-02-01, and e-02-02 were collected from the surface, and at depth intervals of 0.5 to 1.5 feet and 1.5 to 2.5 feet, respectively. Soil analytical results indicated that sample e-02-02 contained 1,2-dichloro- ethene, trichloroethane, and tetrachloroethane :t concentrations of 0.02, 0.075, and 180 mg/kg, respectively. During subsequent investigations, six. soil borings were drilled and sampled at the site (Figure 1-1). Soil boring SS1, located near the southwest comer of the laundry, was targeted to be at the same location as e-01 and e-02 and was drilled and sampled in June 1990. The boring was drilled to a depth of approximately 24 feet, terminating at auger refusal. Five soil samples obtained from the boring were analyzed for EPA target compound list VOCs. Analytical results indicated the presence of acetone, 2-butanone, methylene chloride, PCE, and total xylenes. Acetone, 2-butanone, methylene chloride, and xylenes were found in the associated laboratory method blanks and are common laboratory reagents. Therefore, the concentrations of these substances may not be representative of actual field conditions. In the sample collected from a depth of 2.5 and 4.0 feet (sample TW2), PCE was detected at a concentration of 5,400 micrograms per kilogram (fig/kg). At a depth of approximately 6 feet (sample TW5), PCE was detected at a concentration of 59,000 u\g/kg, and at a depth of approximately 19 feet (sample TW20), PCE was not detected (however, the /"•"""N detection level was elevated). Five additional soil borings have been drilled and sampled at the O'Henry Laundry and are discussed in Geraghty and Miller, 1993. The soil borings arc designated SB 10, SB11, SB 12, SB13, and SB13A in Figure 1-1. PCE was the only significant VOC detected. Concen- trations above detection limits were as follows: • 29 jig/kg from soil boring SB 11 at 0.0 to 2.0 feet • 200 jig/kg from soil boring SB 13 at 4.0 to 6.0 feet • 15 Hg/kg from soil boring SB 13 A at 0.0 to 2.0 feet. 1.1.2 Soil Cleanup Level Two criteria for the soil remediation were developed and presented in the work plan (IT, 1994). These criteria were a risk-based preliminary remediation goal (PRO) using a direct soil exposure scenario and a model-based determination of the maximum PCE concentration in soil that is protective of groundwater if not remediated. Both criteria were based on site- specific data available at that time. The soil cleanup level chosen for the soil remediation was 328 M-g/kg PCE, the more stringent (lower) of the two values calculated (IT, 1994). Prior '"***" to beginning soil remediation activities, discussion with the EPA personnel on site indicated that the EPA preliminary cleanup level was expected to be approximately 200 Jig/kg. The KN0018/WP3018/TXT/08-31-95(1048imVDl/NE 1-2 , ,...,..., . . . , , EPA cleanup level was reported by EPA personnel to be based on vadose zone modeling using site-specific parameters and performed by an EPA contractor. The final results of the modeling were not available at the time of the soil remediation project but at the request of the EPA, soil was removed to approximately 700 (ig/kg. Subsequent to performing this remediation, the EPA has revised the soil cleanup level to 375 |ig/kg for soils from 0 to 1.6 feet below ground surface and 31 u,g/kg for soils more than 1.6 feet below ground surface (CDM Federal Programs Corporation, 1995). The current report incorporates an evaluation of the actual soil left in place and the likely effect on groundwater. 1.2 Report Presentation This document includes: a description of field activities (Chapter 2.0); results of soil sampling (Chapter 3.0); a description of soil remediation progress sampling and operation and maintenance of the soil venting pile (Chapter 4.0); an evaluation of the impact to groundwater of soils left in place (Chapter 5.0); and conclusions and recommendations (Chapter 6.0). Appendices include field logs and analytical results (Appendix A); photographs of the excavation process and soil venting pile construction process (Appendix B); replies to EPA technical review comments (Appendix C); and modeling data files (Appendix D). KN/3018/WP30l8.TXTA»-31-95(10:48«n)/Dl/NE 1-3 /.oo ini q oi 2.0 Field Activities Between March 6 and 17, 1995, soil remediation activities were conducted at the site. Activities included installation of one soil boring, soil excavation, soil venting pile con- struction, backfill of the excavation area, and soil and water samples collection. Appendix A includes visual classification of soil boring logs, field gas chromatography screening activities, variance logs, validated analytical results, and geotechnical testing results. 2.1 Soil Boring Installation Previous analytical results indicated that the maximum concentration of PCE in subsurface soil was approximately 180,000 M-g/kg at a depth of 1.5 to 2.5 feet at sample location e-02-02, taken in 1989. Subsequent to this, L'Henri, Inc. drilled one soil boring SS1 in 1990 and targeted into the location where sample e-02-02 was collected. The maximum concentration of PCE detected from this boring was approximately 59,000 |ig/kg at a depth of 6 feet Soil boring SS1 is located near the southwest side of the laundry (Figure 2-1). The maximum concentration detected in other borings around the site was 200 u,g/kg was detected in soil boring SB 13, which is located near SS1. One soil boring, ITSB01, was drilled during the March 1995 field efforts. Soil boring ITS BO 1 was installed in the area that previously exhibited the highest PCE concentrations (Figure 2-2). The purpose of the boring was to investigate the depth of soil contamination, more accurately determine the depth to bedrock, and collect geotechnical samples. The boring was advanced to auger refusal at a depth of approximately 15 feet The boring was visually logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS); a boring log is included in Appendix A. One undisturbed sample (LH01 and its duplicate LH02) was collected at a depth interval of 5 to 6 feet LH01 was analyzed for the following geotechnical parameters: grain size by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method D 422; moisture content by ASTM D 2216; per- meability by ASTM D 5084; porosity/density by Engineering Manual (EM) 1110-2-1906, Appendix II; and fraction organic material (FOM) by ASTM D 2974. LH02 was not analyzed for geotechnical parameters. 2.2. Soil Excavation Soils in the vicinity of soil boring SS1 were excavated in stages to depths of approximately 1 to 2 feet, 3 to 4 feet, 5 to 6 feet, and 7 to 8 feet The location of the soil excavation is . - shown in Figure 2-1. At each stage, undisturbed soil samples were collected and analyzed by field gas chromatography (GC). At each interval, a minimum of three samples were collected KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/08-31-95(10;48imVDl/NE 2-1 , . , . . HIGHWAY 38 MW02• MW01 a SB10 MW03 • HARVEY WELL, -i C MW04 r-J -P. Legend • Existing Monitor Well Ql Existing Soil Boring O Water Well Approximate Location of Soil Excavation Approximate Location of Soil Storage Area FIGURE 2-1 SOIL EXCAVATION AND SOIL VENTING PILE LOCATIONS O 'HENR Y LA UNDR Y ST. THOMAS U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION STTHOMAS\SOILMAP.DRW/lj/5-10-95 <sI I7/TJ/7J/T/J7 Liquor Bam Excavation Area Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving (Depth Datum) LEGEND: Soil boring SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-2 Excavation Site Plan and Soil Boring Location O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG1 .diw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT 007 2438 from the floor of the excavation. Excavation continued until weathered bedrock was encoun- tered at a depth of 8 feet and PCE concentrations in soil samples submitted for field GC analysis were below the provisional cleanup level (200 ug/kg). A total of 35 soil samples were collected for field GC analysis. On rec_hing the final dimensions of the excavation, five soil samples were collected from the walls and floor of the excavation for confirmation that remediation goals had been met. The samples were analyzed for VOCs according to EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) 1990 Statement of Work (SOW) (Section 3.3). The extent of excavation at each stage, sampling locations and sample results are shown in Figures 2-2 through 2-7. The excavation was visually logged and a log is included in Appendix A. No free phase PCE was observed at any location within the excavated area or in the sidewalls. Excavated soils were temporarily stored on visqueen prior to the construc- tion of a soil venting pile. 2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection During the remediation effort, soil samples were collected for two purposes. Screening samples were collected during excavation for field GC analysis. When the field laboratory had determined that the defined, cleanup level had been met, samples for confirmation were collected and sent to the fixed-base laboratory for analysis of VOCs by EPA CLP 1990 SOW protocol. In addition, soil samples from the upper 1 to 2 feet of the excavation were also sent to the laboratory at the request of the EPA. A summary of the soil sampling information, including sample numbers, locations, depths, and analyses are presented in Table 2-1. All samples for analysis were collected in a manner that minimized losing PCE by volatil- ization. Soil samples for analysis at the fixed-base laboratory were collected as grab samples and were packed unmixed into a glass container, leaving no headspace. The soil samples were immediately cooled to 4°C and shipped under appropriate chain of custody to the Quanterra Environmental Services laboratory in Knoxville, Tennessee for confirmation analysis. All sample results were validated by Quanterra in Knoxville. The EPA project manager collected split samples of some of the confirmation samples. The results of these split sample analyses are included in Section 3.0. 2.2.2 Field Quality Control Samples To ensure reliability of field sampling procedures and materials, field quality control (QC) samples were collected or prepared for each sample shipment to the fixed based laboratory. KNy3018/WP3018.TXTAW-31-95(lK>lpinVIXVNE 2-2 TUT 007 2439 TABLE 2-1 Summary of Site Remediation Analytical Sampling O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Location/ Description Borehole IT-SB-01 First Sampled Interval of Excavation Second Sampled Interva of Excavation Third Sampled Interval of Excavation Westerly Extension of Excavation Sample Number IT-SB-01 -05.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 IT-SB-01 -10.0 IT-SB-01 -10.0-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-06 EXS-06MS EXS-06MD EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-10 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-15 EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 EXS-20 Sampled Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Coordinates (Feet) x" 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7.00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 2.75 K" 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 9.50 Z° 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.75 - 2.7f 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1.00 - 1.25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 2.50 - 2.75 Field GC Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Confirmatory Analysis X X X X X X X X KLREME.XLS5/10/B5 1 of 2 5/10/956:21 PM TABLE 2-1 Summary of Site Remediation Analytical Sampling O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Location/ Description __ Approximate Depth 6ft Excavation Walls Excavation Floor (Final Extent) Devcon Quarry (Excavation Backfill) Decontamination Water Equipment Rinse Field Blank ______ Trip Blank «—«——————"•" ^^^^I^^MMMBIBMBBiBM Sample Number ——— EXSTi EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-27DU EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Devcon1-DP Devconl -MS Devconl -MD DCW-Mar-10-95 Equipment Rinse FB MAR 9-95 TB Mar 9-95 TB030695 Sampled Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 g-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 mi^mfmmmnmm Coordinates (Feet) x" 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na na na na na na na na Y* 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na na na na na na na na 2° 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na na na na na na na na Field GC Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Confirmatory Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Kl * X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest comer of the Liquor Barn. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Liquor Barn and O'Henry Laundry. 5/10/95 •21 PM Y (Feet) i EXS19 Excavation Extended 3/8/95 ( 72 EXS20I X ' X 189 EXS06 / X 9.8 \ I Approximate Extent of Excavation at Nominal 1 ft. Depth Large Boulder 2' x 2' x 1.5' Top at 3' Depth '7T/77/77f77t Liquor , Barn Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST I LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results ____concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o * FEET FIGURE 2-3 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 1'-2' Depth (Approx.) O'Hcnry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG2.diw/l_HENRI/mc/3-24-94 Y (Feet) t Approximate Extent of Excavation at Nominal 3 ft. Depth /77/7777/T7 Liquor Barn Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST I LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-4 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 3'-4' Depth (Approx.) O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG3.drwyLHENRI/mc/3-24-94 OO7 Y (Feet) t /77/7//7/T7/ Liquor Barn Approximate Limits of Excavation at 6 ft. Nominal Depth Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-5 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 6'-7' Depth (Approx.) O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG4.diw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT' O07 Y (Feet) 777/77/77/77, Liqui iquor Barn EXS32 (2.5 feet) X 64 (38) Approximate Limits of Excavation 'at 8 ft. Nominal Depth EXS35 (8.25 feet) X 110 (160) \ EXS34 (8.25 feet) •. X \ X EXS33 (8.2>feef) 15 (31) X X" Concrete vault for 3,000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-6 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) Beneath Excavation O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RQ5.drw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 AST Wall Extends -10' Concrete Slab 120 58 (21) Liquor Bam EXS25 x 174 x(190) 220 Z (300) EXS31 ?70 (560) \ / EXS26 X EXS30 156 EXS28 X 243 (210) x EXS27 195 (850) Ground Surface Ground Surface Excavation Floor EXS 29 172 (150) J LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results concentrations in ug/kg____ Not to Scale FIGURE 2-7 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) in Excavation Walls O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG6.dm/LHENRI/mc/3-27-94 Field QC samples included two trip blanks, one equipment rinsate, one field blank and one field duplicate sample. QC samples were analyzed for the same compounds as samples (CLP VOCs). Trip Blanks. Trip blanks are defined as samples that originate from analyte-free water taken from the laboratory to the sampling site and returned to the laboratory with the volatile organic samples. The purpose of the trip blank is to monitor potential cross contamination of the samples for volatiles during handling and shipment. One trip blank accompanied each cooler containing soil samples as it was transported to the fixed base laboratory. Equipment Rinsate. One equipment rinsate was collected to verify the effectiveness of sampling equipment decontamination and to monitor for potential cross contamination between samples. The equipment rinsate was collected from the final analyte-free water rinses of the equipment process. After a piece of sampling equipment was fully decontami- nated, deionized water was poured across it. The water then was collected in the appropriate sample container as the rinsate sample. Duplicate Samples. Duplicate samples were collected simultaneously with the original samples. Two duplicate samples were analyzed by the field laboratory and one duplicate sample was analyzed by the fixed base laboratory. Field Blank. A source blank is a sample from the final rinse water used for decontamina- tion, which is transferred from its original container to a sample container at the sample location. 2.2.3 Field Screening Soil samples were collected and analyzed on site for the purpose of monitoring the removal of soil containing PCE adjacent to the O'Henry Laundry facility. The analytical program provided real-time data of reliable quality for the purpose of guiding the excavation and avoiding either the removal of an excessive amount of soil or the failure to remove enough soil prior to backfilling. Detection limits of between 4.33 and 12.5 |ig/kg for PCE were used for the field laboratory analysis. Detailed soil screening field activities and analytical methods are included in Appendix A. KK/3018/WP3018.rKrA)8-31-95(lK)lpmyD!2/NE 2-3 TUT *"~" Soil samples were field screened for organic vapors using a photoionization detector (FDD) during soil excavation activities. Table 2-2 presents a summary of PID readings. 2.2.4 Backfilling of Excavation Area The excavation area was backfilled to grade using 30 tons of clean soils transported to the site from Devcon quarry located on Highway 38, in the Tutu area. The backfill material was sampled and submitted for field GC analysis (sample number Devcon 1). Analytical results indicated that PCE concentrations were below the detection limit of 5 M-g/kg. The excavation was filled in lifts. A motorized compactor v/as used to compact the material between the lifts. Photographs of the excavation process are included in Appendix B. 2.3 Soil Venting Pile Construction Excavated soils are being treated on site using ex situ soil venting to volatilize the contami- nants from the soil. The work plan for interim soil remediation (FT, 1994) indicated that soils found to contain detectable levels of PCE would be stored in Department of Transportation (DOT) approved 55-gallon drums or roll-off containers with plastic liners. However, during the March 1995 field activities, it was observed that the proposed storage area was upslope of the adjacent Liquor Barn and if the soil was drummed and stored per the work plan, loose drums could potentially roll into a parking area and become a safety hazard. The drummed soils also would eventually need to be treated as Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste to stringent PCE cleanup standards of 0.5 u,g/kg. Further, soil treatment facilities for solvent-contaminated soils are not available on the island of St. Thomas. Therefore, the EPA Project Coordinator and IT Task Manager agreed that construction of an on-site soil venting pile was a more viable soil treatment alternative to storing the soils in drums with a view to treating the soil at a later date. A verbal approval was obtained by the EPA Project Coordinator from the EPA Region II Superfund Branch Chief, and the change was approved in writing by the EPA Project Coordinator (see variance No. 6 in Appendix A). A soil pile is contained within a 15 by 25 foot concrete pad with 6 foot reinforced concrete walls (Figure 2-1). A shed roof was constructed over the soil venting pile to protect the soil pile against rainfall. Excavated soils were interlayered with washed coarse (1/2 to 1 inch) gravel. Four-inch diameter schedule 20 slotted corrugated black plastic vent pipes were placed horizontally in the gravel layers. Vent pipes were manifolded to roof turbines to provide passive circulation through the soil pile. A reinforced concrete block wall was built around the four sides of the soil pile. Currently, the soil pile is passively venting to the atmosphere, the USVI DPNR and the EPA have indicated that no air permit is necessary. 2-4 TUT O07 Table 2-2 Summary of Organic Vapor Readings O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830 Sample No. EXS06 EXS07 EXS08 EXS09 EXS10 EXS11 EXS12 EXS13 EXS14 EXS15 EXS16 EXS17 EXS18 EXS19 EXS20 EXS21 EXS22 ESX23 EXS24 EXS25 EXS26 EXS27 EXS28 EXS29 EXS30 EXS31 EXS32 EXS33 EXS34 EXS35 PID Reading (ppm) 2 0.1 22 34 0.2 0.25 0.5 1.8 1.8 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.0 0 0 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.5 1.5 11.0 3.0 3.0 7.5 1.0 4.0 2.0 0.5 Figure 2-8 shows the as-built soil venting pile. Photographs showing the progressive soil pile construction process are included in Appendix B. 2.4 Equipment Decontamination The soil sample collection equipment was cleaned by the following steps prior to the collection of any soil samples. • All gross contamination and residual soils were removed by wiping with a moist towel or wire brush. • Any equipment that came into contact with the soil sample was thoroughly washed internally and externally with a brush and warm water and non- phosphatic laboratory grade detergent • All washed equipment were rinsed thoroughly with clean tap water, followed by a rinse with reagent grade hexane or methanol where hexane was not available (see variance log in Appendix A) and a second rinse with tap water. • The cleaned equipment was wrapped in either clean plastic or aluminum foil for storage and handling until used to collect a sample. All equipment used for soil excavation and stockpiling were decontaminated by steam cleaning at the beginning and end of the soil remediation. The equipment was decon- taminated by steam-cleaning at a steam temperature of 220°F and pressure of 1,000 pounds per square inch (psi) with potable water. 2.5 Investigation-Derived Waste All personnel protective equipment and waste plastic sheeting were double-bagged and disposed of in a sanitary landfill. A decontamination area was constructed by lining an appropriate area with 4-millimeter plastic sheeting. Straw bales were placed around the perimeter of the area (beneath the sheeting) to contain runoff, which was collected in a shallow sump. The fluids were pumped from the sump to a 55-gallon DOT approved drum. This was stored hi a secure location at the O'Henry Laundry. The drum was labelled to indicate contents and volume. Pending chemical analysis and approval of the DPNR, decontamination water will be disposed in the sanitary sewer. KN/3018AVP3018.TXT/Oft-31-9S(Mh4SanVOiyNE 2-5 y, ,-, 6"x16" Reinforced Concrete Block Walls CJ -o -I o 0 Soil -#2 Gravel (washed) Soil — -#2 Gravel (washed)- — — -- — — — — — — — — —\ ////////////////// Concrete Slab ///////////////// - — — — 4" Diameter slotted plastic pipe (bottom layer) Vent (6) Sloped 4* Diameter slotted plastic pipe (top layer and risers) SCALE: o 8 FEET RGURE 2-8 As-Built Soil Venting Pile O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG7.diw/LHENRI/mc/3-27-94 ~ 2.6 Variances from the Approved Work Plan The following variances were recorded during soil remediation activities: • Due to the shallow depth at which bedrock was encountered, soil boring ITSB01 was drilled to auger refusal at a depth of 15 feet It was anticipated that bedrock would be encountered at a depth of 25 feet • A soil venting pile was constructed as a passive soil treatment alternative to drumming the soil for later treatment (Section 23). • Due to rocky soil conditions, which impeded sampling with a hand auger, some soil samples were collected with a stainless steel trowel. As a result of a late arriving shipment of laboratory and monitoring supplies, the following variances were recorded during the first 2 days of the soil remediation field efforts (March 6 and 7, 1995): • A PID and explosimeter were not available at the site during the installation of boring ITSB01. ^.-^. • Nonlaboratory grade deionized water was used in place of laboratory grade deionized water. • Methanol was used for equipment decontamination instead of hexane. Variance logs and the appropriate steps taken to obtain appropriate approvals are included in Appendix A. KN/3018AVP301g.TXT/08-31-95(10:48en)/Dl/NE 2-6 £00 3.0 Soil Analytical Results 3.1 Field Screening Analytical Results Field screening analytical results are presented in Table 3-1 and on Figures 2-3 through 2-7. One out of the three samples collected during installation of boring ITSB01 was found to contain PCE concentrations above detection limits. A PCE concentration of 238 u,g/kg was detected in the sample collected at a depth of 5 feet below ground surface. PCE concentra- tions were below detection limits in samples collected at depth intervals of 10 feet and 14.5 feet below ground surface. All samples collected during the excavation contained PCE concentrations above detection limits. PCE concentrations ranged from 9.8 ^g/kg in EXS06 to 2,844.9 Hg/kg in EXS12. The reported value from sample EXS12 is reported as an estimated concentration. A sample aliquot of 0.5 gram was used for analysis; the analytical result exceeded the calibration linear range. Due to problems obtaining additional supplies, the sample was not reextracted and reanalyzed with a smaller aliquot A smaller sample aliquot would have allowed the analytical result to be within linear range; thus, a more accurate value would be reported. The reported result is most likely slightly higher than the actual concentration. Twelve out of the thirty-five samples from the excavation area contained PCE concentrations above the provisional cleanup standard of 200 Hg/kg recommended by the EPA. Only four screening samples exceeded the 328 g/kg cleanup standard developed for the site by IT. PCE concentrations of 214.4 and 324.09 |J.g/kg were detected at a depth of 1 to 2 feet in EXS01 and EXS04, respectively. PCE concentrations of 254.2, 412.31, and 2,844.9 (estimated) Hg/kg were found at a depth of 3 to 4 feet in EXS10, EXS11, and EXS12, respectively. PCE concentrations of 274.15, 341.22, and 454.18 |ig/kg were detected at a depth of 6 feet in EXS15, EXS16, and EXS17, respectively. All of these soils were excavated. Field screening analytical results indicated that three samples from the wall adjacent to the concrete slab contained PCE concentrations above the EPA provisional cleanup level of 200 M-g/kg. PCE concentrations of 275.38, 220.33, and 242.71 jig/kg were detected in EXS23, EXS26, and EXS28, respectively. However, due to physical limitations, it was not possible to remove any more soils; therefore, excavation was terminated. Chapter 5.0 presents an evaluation of the impact to groundwater of soils left in place. KN/3018/WP301S.TXTA»-31-95(103t8«mVDl/NE 3-1 Jj IT TABLE 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number IT-SB-01-05.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 IT-SB-01-10.0 IT-SB-OMO.O-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-06 EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-15 EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 Collected Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 2:20 PM 3:35 PM 3:10 PM 3:10 PM 12:35PM 1:00 PM 1:20 PM 1:45 PM 2:05 PM 8:40 AM 9:1 5 AM 9:30 AM 9:40 AM 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 AM 12:05 PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:1 5PM 3:30 PM 4:00 PM Analyzed Date 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 12:21 PM 1:12 PM 1:37 PM 2:04 PM 3:48 PM 4:19 PM 4:49 PM 5:53 Pto 7:10 PM 11:36 AM 12:02 PM 12:29 PM 1:05 PM 1:34 PM 2:27 PM 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 5:07 PM 2:36 AM 3:00 AM 5:22 AM 5:46 AM 6:09 AM Coordinates (Feet) X* 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7.00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 / 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 2" 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 - 2.75 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1.00 - 1.25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 PCE pg/kg 237.69 12.38 4.33 4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324. )9 83.95 9.81 171.78 189.10 70.20 254.20 412.31 2844.90 101.84 136.02 274.15 341.22 454.18 34.20 71.89 Lab Qual. U1 u U Ba B B B B E3 KLR T:24PM TABLE 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number EXS-20 EXS-21 EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Devconl-DP Collected Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 B-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 4:10 PM 4:1 5PM 4:20 PM 12:00 12:10 12:50 13:10 13:55 14:10 14:50 15:35 15:55 16:15 16:27 16:04 17:00 18:24 18:24 Analyzed Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 6:30 AM 7:29 AM 11:06 AM 3:59 PM 4:24 PM 4:46 PM 2:43 AM 3:07 AM 3:30 AM 3:52 AM 4:16 AM 5:15 AM 5:38 AM 6:01 AM 6:50 AM 7:18 AM 9:36 AM 10:05 AM Coordinates (Feet) X1 2.75 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na f 9.50 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na z" 2.50 - 2.75 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na PCE fig/kg 62.42 133.71 28.40 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U * X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest corner of the Liquor Barn. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Liquor Barn and O'Henry Laundry. 1 U - Not detected. 2 B - Detected in associated field laboratory blank. 3 E - Estimated concentration exceeding calibration range. KLRESULT 2 of 2 5/10/S57:24PM Field GC analysis of all samples collected at a depth of 8 feet indicated that PCE concentra- tions were below the preliminary soil cleanup level of 200 M-g/kg; therefore, the excavation was terminated. Field GC analysis on the backfill material (Devcon 1) indicated that the fill was clean (Table 3-1). Organic Vapor Readings. Organic vapor readings for samples collected during excavation activities ranged from 0.5 ppm to 11 ppm for samples EXS35 and EXS28, respectively. Table 2-2 summarizes PID readings. 3.2 Confirmation Samples Results Confirmation soil samples from soil boring FTSB 01, the excavation floor, walls, and the first "lift" and QC samples were analyzed at a fixed base laboratory for EPA's target analyte list VOCs according to CLP March 1990 SOW. Analytical results presented in Table 3-2 and on Figures 2-3 through 2-7 indicated the presence of PCE, trichloroethane, 1,1,2 trichloroethane, chloromethane, benzene, toluene, and total xylenes. An explanation of data qualifiers used in this table are: J = The analyte/compound was positively identified; the associated value is the approximate concentration. b U = The analyte/compound was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantisation limit. D = This flag identifies all analytes/compounds identified in an analysis at a secondary dilution factor. PCE concentrations ranged from 2J ng/kg in IT SB01 10.0 to 1,100 ng/kg in EXS30. Trichloroethane was detected in only two samples. Samples EXS01 and EXS31 were found to contain trichloroethane at estimated concentrations of 2J and 3J |ig/kg, respectively. 1,1,2- Trichloroethane was detected at an estimated concentration of 8J M-g/kg in EXS30. Chloro- methane was detected in sample EXS04 at an estimated concentration of U p.g/kg. Benzene concentrations ranging from 2J M-g/kg (estimated) to 18 M-g/kg were found in four samples. Toluene concentrations ranged from estimated concentrations of II M-g/kg in EXS04 to 12J M-g/kg in EXS02. Total xylenes were found at an estimated concentration of 3J M-g/kg in EXS02. The analytical validation packages are included in Appendix A. All samples collected from soil boring ITSB-01 and the first "lift" contained PCE concentra- tions that were below the preliminary soil cleanup level of 2,00 M-g/^g- Only the soil sample KN/3018AVP3018.TXT/OS-31-95(10:48«m)/Dl/NE 3-2 TUT' TABLE 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number IT-SB-01-05.0 IT-SB -01 -10.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 TB030695 ESX-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-27DU Parameter Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Trlchloroethene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Xylenes (total) Tetrachloroethene Chloromethane Toluene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethane Toluene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Benzene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Concentration pg/kg 120 2 11 11 140 2 18 120 12 3 54 1 1 100 100 290 21 1 190 300 2 850 2 4 570 2 Validation Qualifier J U U D J J J J J D D J D J D J J D J KLCONF.XLS 1of2 5/11/95 2:33 PM TABLE 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number EX-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 FBMAR995 TBMAR995 DCWMAR1095 EQUIPMENTRIN Parameter Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1 ,2-Dichloroethane Acetone Chloromethane Acetone 1 ,2-Dichloroethane Concentration P8/kfl 210 150 4 8 1100 3 560 2 38 4 2 31 1 170 2 4 160 10 1 1 45 6 1 1 Validation Qualifier D D J J J D J J J J J J J J J J J J J KLCOK 5A }'33PM from a 5-foot depth in boring ITSB-01 contained PCE above the detection limit. Three samples collected from the excavation walls, EXS23, EXS26, and EXS28 showed PCE concentrations above the preliminary cleanup level of 200 p.g/kg, similar to the field GC analytical results. Confirmation results indicated that three additional samples from the excavation walls, EXS27, EXS30, and EXS31, contained PCE concentrations above 200 jig/kg. Field GC analysis had showed these samples to contain PCE concentrations below the preliminary soil cleanup level of 200 fig/kg. The samples were collected from the area located adjacent to or beneath concrete paving between the O'Henry Laundry and the Liquor Bam (Figure 2-7). Fixed laboratory sample results confirmed that the excavation floor soils were below the preliminary soil cleanup level of 200 (ig/kg. Therefore, all soils with PCE contamination beneath the unpaved area had been excavated. EPA split sample results are presented in Table 3-3. All of the sample results are qualified as estimated concentrations. Four of the EPA split samples showed PCE concentrations that were above the preliminary cleanup level of 200 u.g/kg. Samples EXS25, EXS28, EXS30, and EXS31 showed estimated PCE concentrations of 210J, 220J, 480J, and 630J |ig/kg, respectively. 3.3 Evaluation of Field Screening and Laboratory Analytical Results A comparison of me PCE results from samples collected and analyzed by the field GC and in the laboratory by IT and split samples analyzed by the EPA are included in Table 3-4. An examination of this table indicates that the field GC analyses yielded the highest concentration in ten samples, the IT laboratory analysis is yielded the highest concentrations in eight samples and the EPA laboratory yielded the highest concentrations in two samples. The field GC result was only lower than the IT laboratory result for four samples where an EPA laboratory split sample result was not available (EXS05, EXS26, EXS27, and EXS35). Of these, samples, there was only one sample (EXS27) where the IT laboratory result was more than double the field GC result (195.14 p-g/kg from field GC and 850D u.g/kg from IT laboratory). For mis sample, a duplicate analysis was performed which indicated a value (570D Jig/kg), that is intermediate to the field GC result and IT laboratory result for the original sample. KN/3018/WP3018.TJCT/08-31-95{12:53pmyD2/NE 3-3 Table 3-3 Summary of EPA Split Sample Results O'Henry Laundry a St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Sample Number EXS023 EXS024 EXS025 EXS028 EXS030 EXS031 EXS032 EXS033 EXS034 Parameter Acetone 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Bromoform Tetrachtoroethene Xytenes (total) Tetrachtoroethene Acetone Tetrachloroethene Acetone Tetrachtoroethene Methylene chloride Acetone 2-Hexanone Tetrachtoroethene Acetone Trichtoroethene Tetrachtoroethene Acetone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl 1-2-pentanone Tetrachloroethene Tetrachtoroethene Acetone Tetrachtoroethene Result (ug/kg) 21J 2J 36J 43J 2J 100J 2J 2J 4J 21 OJ 9J 220J 2J 45J 3J 480J 51J 4J 630J 15J 9J 7J 34J 30J 10J 30J Notes: J - Estimated concentration KNA301gVWP3018.3-3A»-31-95<10:17«m)/D2/NE TUT 007 Table 3-4 Comparison of Field GC and Laboratory PCE Results in (ig/kg O'Henry Laundry St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Sample Number ITSB-01-05.0 ITSB-01-10.0 ITSB-01-14.5 EXS01 EXS02 EXS03 EXS04 EXS05 EXS23 EXS24 EXS25 EXS26 EXS27 EXS28 EXS29 EXS30 EXS31 EXS32 EXS33 EXS34 ^ EXS35 Field GC 237.69" 12.38 4.33/4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324.09 83.95 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 IT Laboratory 120 2J 11 U 140 D 120 54 100 D 100 290 D 21 190 300 D 850 D/570 D 210 D 150 D 1100 560 D 38 31 170 160 ERA Laboratory 100 J 2J 210 J 220 J 480 J 630 J 34J 30 J 30 J "Highlighting indicates which analytical method yielded the highest concentration for each sample. KN/3018/WP3018.3-4fOS-31-95<10:l 8m)/Dl/NE For the samples for which EPA split samples are available and where the IT (or EPA) laboratory results are higher than the field GC results, four samples have laboratory results which are more than double the field GC results (EXS30, EXS31, EXS33, and EXS34). In three of these cases, the IT laboratory has the highest concentration and in one case the EPA laboratory has the highest concentration. There are only three samples where the field GC analysis was below the preliminary cleanup standard and where the confirmation sampling analysis was above the preliminary cleanup standard (EXS27, EXS30, and EXS31). these three samples are located beneath the concrete slab on the northern wall of the excavation. In addition, the following should be noted: • Quality control measures were taken during field analysis to support the validity of the test method. Appropriate instrument calibrations were performed and check standards were continuously analyzed throughout the field analysis to verify correct instrument performance. Accuracy and precision data (i.e., MS/MSD samples and surrogate spikes) indicate no problem with data generated by the field GC. • Interpretation of soil VOC data is often fraught with difficulties due to inherent problems with the sampling and analytical process. Losses of VOCs have been reported due to volatilization caused by sample disruption during field or laboratory subsampling, as well as leakage and/or transformation during pre- analytical handling. VOCs may become physically entrapped in the micro- structure of soils and can be difficult to desorb and remove during extraction. In addition, ancillary soil properties (e.g., water content, organic carbon content, temperature) can affect spatial variability and soil VOC behavior. VOC concen- trations vary in soils both in space and time. Therefore variability in measure- ment of VOCs can be large as a result of natural variability. Focus should be on the comprehensive data sets rather than on discrete values and on the laboratory confirmation samples, rather than the field GC. The confirmation samples indicate that soils have been removed to below the preliminary cleanup standard with the exception of an area of soil beneath the concrete slab. 3.4 Geotechnical Testing One geotechnical samples was collected from borehole ITSB-01. (LH01 and its duplicate LH02). LH01 only was tested for permeability, porosity, density, moisture content, grain size, and FOM. Results of the geotechnical testing are included in Appendix A. These results indicate that the soils in the vadose zone at the site have a vertical permeability of 1.7 KN/Mlg/WP301g.TXT/OS-31-9S(l(MSanVDl/NE 3-4 TUT 007 ".. x 10*7 centimeters per second (cm/s). Particle size with hydrometer analysis results indicated a fine sand with traces of silt The soil was calculated to have a moisture content of 11.8 percent, a bulk density of 107.09 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), and a dry density of 95.76 pcf. Results indicated porosity of 44.76 percent and an average FOM of 0.014. The FOM can be related to the fraction organic carbon (FOC) by dividing by 1.724 (Dragun, 1988). Therefore, the average FOC calculated is 0.008 or 0.8 percent Total organic carbon (TOC) measured by the EPA from a soil sample from the O'Henry laundry indicated TOC at 0.6 percent which is in close agreement with the value for FOC obtained by IT. The FOC value used by FT to calculate the soil cleanup standard in the work plan (IT, 1994) was lower than the values determined by IT and the EPA from laboratory tests. The effect of using a higher FOC in the previous modeling would have resulted in a higher cleanup standard. Results of the geo- technical testing have been incorporated into the modeling presented in Chapter 5.0. KN/3018/WP3018.TXTA»-31-95(lCk4««mVDl/NE 3-5 TUT O07 2464 O'fr 4.0 Soil Remediation Progress Sampling and Operations and Maintenance of Soil Venting Pile 4.1 Quarterly Soil Sampling Soil sampling of the venting pile will be conducted on a quarterly basis for a period of one year to monitor the progress of the soil remediation and to determine when the soils can be considered clean. The soil pile consists of two soil layers with each layer divided into quadrants by the venting pipes (Section 2.3). One discrete soil sample will be collected from the approximate center of each quadrant in each layer with the depth of the sample to be determined as described below during each sampling event. A total of eight samples will be collected from the soil pile per sampling event. In order to ensure reliability of field sampling procedures and materials, QC samples will be collected or prepared. QC samples will include one field duplicate, one trip blank and an equipment rinsate sample per sampling event. Samples will be analyzed for EPA's target analyte list VOCs according to EPA's CLP March 1990 SOW. All data will be validated. It is anticipated that stainless steel bucket augers will be used for soil sample collection. Samples will be collected continuously through each layer at each location and headspace measured for VOCs using a PID or FDD. The sample exhibiting the most elevated PID or FID reading for each layer at each location will be sent to the laboratory for analysis. Soil removed from the pile, but not sent to the laboratory for analysis will be placed back in the pile at the location from which it was removed. Decontamination procedures for soil sample collection equipment will be similar to the procedures followed during soil remediation effort in accordance with the work plan for evaluation and interim soil remediation (IT, 1994). Sampling will be conducted in accordance with the health and safety plan included in Appendix A of the soil remediation work plan (IT, 1994). A letter report with validated data will be transmitted to the EPA within two months after each sampling event. If, at the end of the four quarters of soil sampling, the soils are shown to have concentrations less than the provisionally accepted cleanup level of 200 u,g/kg (or as determined by the EPA), then the soil venting will be considered complete and no further soil sampling will be required. KN/3018/WP3018/rXT/08-31-9S<l:05i>myD2/NE 4-1 TUT OO7 2466 4.2 Operations and Maintenance During quarteriy soil sampling activities, the walls, roof and other components of the soil venting pile structure will be examined. If repairs are needed, these shall be recommended to L'Henri at the time they are noticed. Since ±e soil venting pile is a passive system no other operations or maintenance activities are anticipated. KN/301S/WP301S.TXTO8-31-95(l<MS«m)/Dl/NE 4-2 OO7 246 O'S ~ 5.0 Evaluation of Impact to Groundwater of Soils Left in Place Based upon analytical results of the confirmatory soil samples collected during soil remediat- ion activities and physical conditions at the site, soils left in place at the O'Henry Laundry site represent two distinct PCE soil concentration profiles: • Profile 1: Soils left in place at the excavation base overlain by clean backfill material brought from Off Site. Analytical results indicated that soils used as backfill material from ground surface to a depth of 8.25 feet within the excavation area were clean soils with PCE concentrations below detection limits. Soils underlying the backfill material at the excavation base, at a depth of 8.25 ft and deeper, were found to contain PCE at a concentration of 170 parts per billion (ppb). The soil boring ITSB-01 defines the limits of the contamination at 10 feet below grade (i.e., nondetect at 10 feet). • Profile 2: Soils beneath the concrete area on the northern excavation wall. Soils collected from the northern excavation wall, beneath the paved concrete slab were found to contain PCE at concentrations of 38, 560 and 1100 ppb at depth intervals of 2 to 3 ft, 3.75 to 4 ft, and 5.33 to 5.88 ft, respectively. No depth limit /*—*v has been defined for me contamination under the paved concrete area; however, the depth of the base of contamination was assumed to be the same as for Profile 1. Table 5-1 shows the two vertical distribution profiles of PCE soil concentrations. Using the above PCE concentration soil profiles and site specific soil parameters obtained during the soil remediation activities, groundwater impact due to the mobilization and migration of PCE in the vadose zone was estimated using the computer program VLEACH Version 2.0 (Ravi, et al., 1993). VLEACH is a one-dimensional vadose zone model that predicts contaminant behavior within the vadose zone using a finite difference method. The modelling assumptions were the same as those described in the work plan (IT, 1994) with the exceptions as described below. These values were obtained during the March 1995 soil remediation activities: • The soil type at O'Henry is predominantly sandy silt with clay soil. • Dry bulk density = 1.53 g/mL • Volumetric water content = 0.3. KN/3018/WP3018.TXW»-31-95(l«9pmVD2ffIE 5-1 ] j ( j Table 5-1 Concentration Profiles Used in the VLEACH Model O'Henry Laundry St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands Concentration Profile No. 1 2 Depth Interval (ft) 0-8.25 8.25-10 0 - 3 3 - 5 5-10 PCE Concentration (PPb) 0 170 38 560 1100 KN/3018/WP30185-lA»-31-9500:19anVDl/NE TUT Other revised input parameters taken from COM, 1995 included: • Hydraulic gradient =0.073 ft/ft • Organic Carbon Partition Coefficient (K^.^364 ml/g • Soil FOC (f^ = 0.006). (The more conservative of the two site-specific values determined by IT and the EPA). Model data files (LHENRI for Profile 1 and LHENRI2 for Profile 2) are supplied in App- endix D. The VLEACH model provides information on the amount of PCE released to the groundwater in terms of grams per year at every time step. PCE concentrations in groundwa- ter due to the impact of leachate were estimated using VLEACH/mass loading estimates and a one-cell mfx-ing model for the aquifer directly below the contaminated vadose zone. The mixing model assumes complete mixing in the water column. The PCE concentration in groundwater [Af] was calculated using: leachate/year Volume of water flawing through unit width per year where water volume = n x t x L x W: n = porosity = 0.4 t = aquifer thickness = 10 ft L = flow velocity using a hydraulic conductivity of 1.59 ft/day and a hydraulic gradient of 0.073 W = a unit cross-sectional width Water volume = 0.4 x 10 ft x 42.37 & x 1 ft year = 169.5 f^/year = 4796 Liters/year The incremental increase in PCE concentrations in groundwater for the O'Henry site using the two PCE concentration soil profiles are shown in Figures 5-1 and 5-2, respectively. Table 5-2 summarizes the highest groundwater PCE concentrations and the time at which the peak impact occurs beneath the site. Figures 5-1 and 5-2 show that with the current PCE soil KN/3018/WP3018.TXTA»-31-95(12^4pmVn2/NE 5-2 CO 7 "?&--/• Table 5-2 VLEACH Modeling Results - Highest Groundwater PCE Concentrations and Time of Peack Impact O'Henry Laundry St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Beneath Excavated Area Beneath Paved Concrete Area Concentration Profile No. (Refer Table 1) 1 2 Highest Groundwater PCE Concentration (ug/L) 0.026 0.44 Time for Peak Impact (Years) 76 90 KN/3018/WP3018J-2AW-31-9S(10aOBn)/Dl/NE FIGURE 5-1 0.030 - O Predicted Groundwater Impact—foc=0.006 (Area under Excavation) 0.000 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 100 200 300 400 Time (years FIGURE 5-2 0.500 -i c •t* 0.000 Predicted Groundwater lmpact-foc=0.006 (Area under Paved Concrete) 100 200 300 Time (y^ars) F'l I ! I 400 i 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 6.1 Conclusions Soils that contained PCE concentrations above the provisional cleanup level recommended by the EPA of 200 M-g/kg were excavated to the physical extent possible and a soil venting pile was constructed at the site. Field GC and confirmation samples indicate that soil with concentrations above the provisional cleanup levels of 200 fig/kg are left in place beneath the concrete paving at the northern end of the excavation because of physical limitations. No free phase PCE (or other DNAPL) was observed at any location within the excavated area or in the sidewalls. Because of the low PCE concentrations found in the soils during excavation activities, it is anticipated that passive soil venting to the atmosphere will be sufficient to volatilize PCE from the excavated soil. Subsequent to performing the soil remediation, the EPA has revised the cleanup level to 375 |ig/kg PCE in the 0 to 1.6-foot depth and 31 jig/kg PCE below 1.6 feet. Modeling by the EPA, the results of which were incorporated into their comments, indicated that when considering a generalized profile of the site, soils left in place would impact groundwater to above the MCL for PCE. However, using the finite difference model code VLEACH and incorporating site-specific data and separate profiles for soil in the excavation area, it can be seen that soil remaining in place near the O'Henry laundry will not impact groundwater to concentrations above the MCL for PCE. Soil Boring ITSB-01 was targeted into the location where previous soil samples had indicated the highest PCE concentrations. Soil samples from this boring indicate lower concentrations than previously detected. In addition, samples from boring ITSB-01 indicate PCE concentra- tions below detection level from the 10-foot depth and below. Based on an evaluation of the spatial PCE concentrations from field GC and laboratory confirmation sampling shown in Figures 2-3 through 2-7, the depth profile for PCE concentrations in boring ITSB-01 appears representative of the depth profile of PCE concentrations in soil in the excavation area. PCE, which may have entered soil and migrated from the unpaved area back under the concrete will have the following characteristics: • It is unlikely to have migrated more than a few feet horizontally • It will not volatilize as fast because it is effectively "capped" • It will not migrate vertically downward in the dissolved phase as fast because there is a reduced driving force (i.e., lower infiltration). KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/0*-31-9S(10:48«n)/Dl/NE 6-1 Given the above characteristics and visual observations, which indicate no residual free-phase in soil and no vertical pathway for preferred contaminant migration (soils are uniform) the contaminant profile in boring ITSB-01 may not be indicative of concentrations in soils beneath the paved area in terms of actual concentrations; however, it accurately reflects the "general profile" where the maximum concentrations of PCE in soil is between 5 and 10 feet below grade and there is nondetect below 10 feet. 6.2 Recommendations Based on the conclusions, it is recommended that no further remediation be performed at the site. Quarterly soil sampling of the soil venting pile will take place for a period of 1 year to monitor the progress of the ex situ soil remediation. KN/301S/WP301g.TXT/08-31-95(10:48«n)/Dl/NE 6-2 7.0 7.0 References CDM Federal Program Corporation (COM), 1995, Estimation of Soil Cleanup Concentra- tions Required to Protect Groundwater as a Source of Drinking Water, Tutu Wells Site, U.S. Virgin Islands. Dragun, J., 1988, The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute. Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 1993, Technical Memorandum II, Results of the Field Program, Tutu Service Station Investigation, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. IT Corporation, 1994, Work Plan for Evaluation and Interim Remediation of Soils, O'Henry Laundry, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1995, Administrative Order on Consent for Removal Action No. n-CERCLA-95-0401. KN/301g/WP301gTXTAW-31-95<lft48«m)/Dl/NE 7-1 os 1/s z.oo mi X1 0> Q. Q. APPENDIX A VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS - BORING LOGS ~ FIELD GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SCREENING ACTIVITIES VARIANCE LOGS VALIDATED ANALYTICAL RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/B8-31-95(10:17inj)/Dl/NE VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS - BORING LOGS KN/301g/WP3018.TXT/08-31-95(10:17im)/m/NE TUT 007 248 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS •^PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.002 . ^ PROJECT NAME: L'H EN Rl Soil Remediation BORING NUMBER: Excavation COORDINATES. ELEVATION: GWL DEPTH: DATE: ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: K Loy GWL DEPTH: DATE: DRILLING METHODS: BACKHOE £ — Q. e 3> ._. O —— 0 —— — — """"" 6 ^~ — — — 8 — ~ ~~ — 10 — — 12 - —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— — - \\ jfc <a DESCRIPTION Moderate yellow brown (1 0 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with clay, slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction angular to subangular igneous rock fragments, highly weathered, discrete bodies of organic material up to 8' diameter. Layer is massive, contains manmade debris, nails, wire, wood, 1/2* thick caliche at base, continuous. (See next description). Olive gray (5 Y 3/2), SILT, thinly laminated, forms continuous layer (caliche). Moderate yellow brown (10 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with clay, slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction as above, weakly stratified, root zone at base. Light brown (5 YR 6/4), sandy SILT with clay, slightly moist, increasing sand content with depth, light olive gray (5 Y 5/2), andesite boulders and cobbles starting at 6 feet. Base of Excavation (Fractured Bedrock - Not Rippable with Backhoe) jscs SYMBOL! ml (fill) ml ml DATE: 3/10/85 DATE STARTED: 3/7/95 DATE COMPLETED: 3/9/95 5 § G? REMARKS NOTES: Depth measured from concrete slab: j Vertical Scate: 1' =2 \ Logged from vertical face at excavation f^^H '^^^LoeY*1" directly beneath concrete slab ^JLS CORPORATION Bccw/LHENRI/diw/nncO-27-85 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.002 PROJECT NAME: L'HENRI Soil Remediation BORING NUMBER: ITSB01 COORDINATES: ELEVATION: GWL DEPTH: DATE: ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: K. Loy GWL DEPTH: DATE: DRILLING METHODS: 6" HOLLOW STEM AUGER; 18' X 1.5' I.D. SPLIT SPOON; 140 LB HAMMER O — o — — —— _ — — — ^— • -^— « — 10 —— — — — 15 —— — . —— _ —— — 20. —— — 25 —— <s ID £ 0. *~ E <*> 8 i ITSB -05.0 1420 LH01 1435 LH02 1440 ITSB -10.0 1510 ITSB -14.5 1535 <D ° si »£ — . ® OT 3/3/4 17/25/16 23/55/74 58/79/R r cc 8" 101 12' 8' DESCRIPTION Moderate yellow brown (10 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with clay, slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction angular to subangular volcanic rock fragments - highly weathered, discrete bodies of organic matter Light brown (5 YR 6/4), sandy SILT with clay, moist, grading to andesite, light olive gray (5 Y 5/24), weathered, dissegregated, dry Dusky yellow green (5GY5/2), andesite, fractured, unweathered, dry Light olive gray (5 Y 5/2) silty fine SAND, some clay, dry, appears derived from weathered bedrock (See footnote) Auger Refusal at 1 5 Ft. O 5 ^* en CO -5 ml (Fill) ml iveath. And. And sm DATE: 3/6/95 DATE STARTED: 3/6/95 DATE COMPLETED: 3/6/95 1 z = 1 cr 3£ g REMARKS Split sample: CLP VOC/Field GC Shelby Tube 16oz. geotechnical Split sample: CLP VOC/Field GC Split sample: CLP VOC/Field GC t = Attempted shelby tube sample - refusal on rock - bent shelby tube NOTES: Drilling Contractor: Caribbean Drilling Services, St Croix, USVI Driller. Denzel Dawkins ,.— - Helper: Shawn McConnel, Wesley Jameson - Caribbean Hydrotech. ETGTI INrERNATIONAL sm - In situ material probably retains bedrock structure, disaggregates on sampling BJ^J CORPORATION 1 And. - Andesite Wealh. And. - Weathered Andesita | rrsB01/LHENni/drw/mc/3-27-9S FIELD GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SCREENING ACTIVITIES KN/3018/WP3018.TXTAW-31-95(10:17im)/Dl/NE T U "!" Field Analytical Activities at the O'Henry Laundry Site 1.0 Narrative of Events A field chemist was mobilized from Quanterra Environmental Services Field Analytical Services (FAS) group to St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVT), on March 5, 1995, to analyze soils at the O'Henry Laundry Site for tetrachloroethene (PCE). The equipment that was mobilized included two gas chromatographs (GC), two portable computers, two dot matrix printers, an analytical balance, and miscellaneous laboratory supplies. Extremely small volume standards were transported with the equipment in accordance with applicable safety regulations. Larger volumes of solvents were transported by ship from Puerto Rico. The required instrumentation was set up in a rental van parked near the site on Monday, March 6, 1995. The purpose of the March 6 activities was to calibrate the gas chromatograph under field conditions. Five-point calibration was accomplished in the field, but trap and oven cool down times were extremely long. Heat transfer to warm air is not efficient, and the cool down time was extended by the warm climate at the site. A decision was made to set up the equipment in an air conditioned hotel room effective March 7, prior to analyzing any samples. Samples were collected on March 6 through March 9, 1995. The samples collected on March 6 were collected from soil boring IT-SB-01, and most subsequent samples were collected from the floor and walls of an excavation as described in the geologist's field logs. One sample of fill soil was obtained and screened for tetrachloroethene. The samples were analyzed from March 7 to March 10, 1995, when the laboratory was demobilized and returned to Knoxville. The analytical results are presented in Table 1. All samples were analyzed using a GC SRI Model 8610 equipped with a photoionization detector and a built in chemical trap containing Tenax absorbent. A thick film, nonpolar chromatographic column was used to separate PCE from earlier eluting analytes and the surrogate compound, 2-chlorotoluene (CT). Air supplied by an in-board pump was filtered to remove hydrocarbon impurities and used as the GC carrier gas. G:\»\O-Hany\KL»BPl\M 1 j-j r TABLE 1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number IT-SB-01-05.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 IT-SB-01-10.0 IT-SB-01-10.0-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-06 EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-10 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-15 EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 Collected Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 2:20 PM 3:35 PM 3:10 PM 3:10 PM 12:35PM 1:00 PM 1:20 PM 1:45 PM 2:05 PM 8:40 AM 9:1 5 AM 9:30 AM 9:40 AM 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 AM 12:05PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 4:00 PM Analyzed Date 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 12:21 PM 1:12 PM 1:37 PM 2:04 PM 3:48 PM 4:19 PM 4:49 PM 5:53 PM 7:10 PM 11:36 AM 12:02 PM 12:29 PM 1:05 PM 1:34 PM 2:27 PM 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 5:07 PM 2:36 AM 3:00 AM 5:22 AM 5:46 AM 6:09 AM Coordinates (Feet) x- 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7.00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 / 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 Z" 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 - 2.75 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1 .00 - 1 .25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 PCE P9/kg 237.69 12.38 4.33 4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324.09 83.95 9.81 171.78 189.10 70.20 254.20 412.31 2844.90 101.84 136.02 274.15 341 .22 454.18 34.20 71.89 Lab Qual. U1 u U B2 B B B B E3 KLRt 6:05 PM TABLE 1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number EXS-20 EXS-21 EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Devcon1-DP Collected Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9 Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 4:10 PM 4:1 5PM 4:20 PM 12:00 12:10 12:50 13:10 13:55 14:10 14:50 15:35 15:55 16:15 16:27 16:04 17:00 18:24 18:24 Analyzed Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 6:30 AM 7:29 AM 11:06 AM 3:59 PM 4:24 PM 4:46 PM 2:43 AM 3:07 AM 3:30 AM 3:52 AM 4:16 AM 5:1 5 AM 5:38 AM 6:01 AM 6:50 AM 7:1 8 AM 9:36 AM 10:05 AM Coordinates (Feet) x" 2.75 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na y* 9.50 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na 2° 2.50 - 2.75 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na PCE pg/kg 62.42 133.71 28.40 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U -i 8 X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest corner of the Liquor Barn. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Liquor Barn and O'Henry Laundry. 1 U - Not detected. 2 B - Detected in associated field laboratory blank. 3 E - Estimated concentration exceeding calibration range. KLRESULT 2 of 2 5/10/95 6:05 PM 2.0 Quality Assurance Activities Statistical analyses of all recovery data are presented in Table 2. Percent recovery averages and standard deviations are presented for continuing calibrations, matrix spikes, and surrogates. The allowed range of value, for a 95 percent confidence interval is also calculated. 2.1 Calibration A five-point calibration curve was generated on March 6, 1995. Continuing calibration standards were run at least daily as shown in Table 3. The continuing calibration standard that was run on the morning of March 9 was considered to be too divergent from the initial calibration curve. Four more standards were analyzed to provide raw data with which to calculate a new five-point calibration for PCE, and a four-point calibration for CT. A final continuing calibration standard was run on March 10 to indicate that the test method remained in control. The average PCE recovery for the continuing calibration standards was 98.7 percent, with a standard deviation of 1.9 percent. The upper and lower limits of the population of recoveries predicted by these standards were 95 percent and 102.5 percent, respectively, at a 95 percent confidence interval. The surrogate, 2-chlorotoluene, exhibited higher variability, but was clearly in control. 22 Matrix Spike Recovery The original work plan called for three matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) pairs to be analyzed. Increases in the number of samples analyzed over the original scope of services cost time, and only two pairs of matrix spike samples were analyzed. Matrix spike data are reported in Table 4. The average recovery for PCE was 98.6 percent, with a standard deviation of 5.1 percent. Based on these results, the matrix spike recoveries would be expected to be within 88 and 109 percent recovery. The recovery data were very reproducible, with relative percent difference (RPD) of 3.3 percent and 3.8 percent. Based on these data, the accuracy and precision of the test method was in control. 2.3 Surrogate Recovery Each sample was spiked with surrogate (CT) to monitor the test in progress. Surrogate recoveries were expected in the range of 60 to 140 percent recovery. In fact, surrogate recovery ranged from 77.3 to 132.9 percent recovery after outlier results were rejected from ..,; consideration. The results for analyses that exhibited poor recoveries were generally rejected, ft\J.\O-Henry\KLREPl\b( Z TUT' TABLE 2 Statistical Analysis of Quality Assurance Parameters O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Parameter Continuing Calibration Standard % Recovery Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2-Chlorotoluene (CT.surr) Matrix Spike % Recovery Tetrachloroethene (PCE) Surrogate % Recovery 2-Chlorotoluene (CT.surr) * Average 98.7% 100.7% 98.6% 105.1% Standard Deviation 1 .9% 6.6% 5.1% 13.9% 95% Confidence Interval Upper 95.0% 87.6% 88.3% 77.3% Lower 102.5% 113.9% 108.9% 132.9% * Outlier value for IT-SB-01 -10.0 was excluded. KLSTAT.XLS Of1 4/13/95 8:29 AM TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING CALIBRATION DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number Standard, 5ppb Standard, 20ppb Standard, SOppb Standard, 100ppb Standard, 100ppb Standard, 200ppb CCV STD SOD CCV STD EOD CCV STD SOD Standard, 100/100 Standard, 50/100 Standard, 20/50 Standard, 5/25 Standard, 200/200 CCV STD EOD Collected Date na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na Time na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na Analyzed Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 2:31 PM 2:57 PM 3:29 PM 4:05 PM 4:34 PM 5:07 PM 1 1 :32 AM 7:40 PM 10:54 AM 11:53 AM 12:18 PM 12:41 PM 1:08 PM 2:00 PM 12:53 PM PCE ug/kg na na na na na na 50.63 49.53 48.65 na na na na na 48.65 PCE %Recovery na na na na na na 101.3% 99.1% 97.3% na na na na na 97.3% CT % Recovery na na na na i.a na 99.7% 108.1% 92.4% na na na na na 102.9% ?95 8:35 AM TABLE 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S.Virgln Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number Devcon1-MS Devcon1-MD IT-EXS-06-MS IT-EXS-06-MD Collected Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 18:24 18:24 8:40 AM 8:40 AM Analyzed Date 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 11:19AM 1 1 :42 AM 12:05PM 12:28PM Coordinates (Feet X na na 6.00 6.00 y na na 675 6.75 zd) na na 2.00 2.00 z(2) na na 3.00 3.00 PCE %Recovery 101.1% 104.4% 92.8% 96.3% CT % Recovery 103.0% 109.5% 97.8% 96.0% c KLQUAL.XLS 1 of 1 4/13/95 6:58 AM and not reported. Samples having poor surrogate recoveries were immediately reanalyzed. The average surrogate recovery was 105.1 percent with a standard deviation of 13.9 percent. 2.4 Method Blank Contamination Method blank data are reported in Table 5. Only one method blank exhibited any level of contamination by PCE. Method blank MBLK1 had 0.61 pg/L PCE reported. The sample data that was associated with this blank was flagged as B (blank contamination) whenever PCE was detected. However, the blank contamination was far below the observed values for the samples, and did not affect the results. , 2.5 Variances The three variances that occurred during the analytical portion of this project were as follows: • Two MS/MSD pairs were analyzed instead of three. • Only two pairs of results were duplicated by the field laboratory instead of three. • One sample should have been extracted with methanol and reanalyzed. Sample IT-EXS-12 was reported as 2844 ^ug/kg E because even an 0.5-gram sample gave over-range results. The methanol that was shipped to St. Thomas was not obtained in time to extract and reanalyze the sample. O:\M\O-Hmy\KLREPl\bf TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF BLANK DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S.Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number SOD Blank SOD Blank MBLK1 EOD Blank SOD Blank MBLK2 SOD Blank MBLK3 Analyzed Date 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 1:56 PM 10:45 AM 8:09 PM 8:36 PM 10:19 AM 11:29 AM 7:49 AM 1:18PM PCE ug/kg 5.00 5.00 0.61 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U J U U U U U PCE % Recovery na na na na na na na na CT %Recovery na na 1 1 1 .7% 0.0% 0.0% 140.8% 0.0% 95.1% KLBLK.XLS 1 Of 1 4/13/95 8:48 AM 3.0 Conclusions The data obtained at the O'Henry Laundry Site were in control. One sample was reported over-range, but the value was clearly above the action level for the remediation. The field laboratory program was successful. TUT 007 249? VARIANCE LOGS KN/3018/WP3018.TXTA»-31-95(10:n«mVDl/NE ri , , , . , . _ , INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY .*•*:- CORPORATION >--- VARIANCE NO.. VARIANCE LOG •PROJECT NO. WT-g-^. ^ <— ,____________________ PAGE f np PRO'JECT MAMF L(Ll*^st^ j^cx* /£^^&&<zl&0^i______ DATE:I .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) v& APPLICABLE DOCUMENT: > t / #d. — ^V7 S(& CC: REQUESTED **• tiyi-e.™ * nATF- /—s APPROVED RY--1^aA-lKO^ -^^uz. HATF- Monag«r .DATE:, JhATE:. Quality AMurane* Offlcw INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 7 CORPORATION VARIANCE N0._£=_ VARIANCE LOG -PROJECT NO. < ,<<______________________ PAGE •PROJECT K1AMF L-'M-g^.-i -Sf." I R •f^r<xf/&7,<<W.__________ DATF- .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) - : ' y^€ . ' '" j,/ p' ^^ • ^ ~ter * - fwft^ *j#4*t*«. <*f. -<UtjW<&iU f &r» *¥ / ' — ^ 7 ^^^ y * «*y f*~ -/ f/ / {.••fLJ.'CCLAs^C? '-i,cn &,<£•£ -stsisf. / ^ I APPLICABLE DOCUMENT: '/,'/&A r/ "J/ " j J ' '^^-ci-***, S.S-L- CC: REQUESTED RY- s^t i&& nATT> APPROVED RY-"DQXu<cito. y^d nATF- Project MonQQtr _____________ DATE:, Quality Anuranet Offlew ______________ DATE:. 4CM19-7 TUT 007 249P " INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ^- CORPORATION;- VARIANCE MO VARIANCE LOG '.PROJECT NO. PROJECT So &5*< <*i/ PAGE D A TFr .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) APPLICABLE DOCUMENT -/i^f f IJZ^* ' RYr HATF- ProjKst U«wg«- Quality AMurane* Offle«r DATE: DATE: 40B618-7 r- r • ^W m • ^& INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO. VARIANCE LOG :'-PROJECT NO. PROJECT MAMF PAGE OF . VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) APPUCABLE DOCUMENT: CC: REQUESTED APPROVED Projict Monogv Quality AMurano* Offlecr .DATE:. .DATE:. 40061 »-7 .%,--. • •:*•*•: >i?' >. .fc ..<•«*•' •NF- • :^v•rfh ty:*\ .^::>B ^H'-•a- -r**^. • '«i>*; INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE N0.__$_ VARIANCE LOG •PROJECT NO. • PRO'JECT NAME Sot'/ PAGE DATE: OF. .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIRCATION) /i . ZL APPLICABLE DOCUMENT V CC: REQUESTED BY: APPROVED Pro>et Monog«- Quality Anurane* Offlew .DATE:. .DATE:. .DATE:. 40M1»-7 1UT DOS OOO1 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE LOG PAGE _L_OF_L_ DATE: PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) „ .___ APPLICABLE DOCUMENH": REQUESTED RY- APPROVED «Mt»-7 TUT OOS OOO:? VALIDATED ANALYTICAL RESULTS KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/l»-31-95(10:17«m)/Dl/NE Quanterra Emimntnvntal Memorandum To: Belinda Price - IT, Knoxville Date: April 10, 1995 From: Ten Jackson - Quanterra, Knoxville Subject: L'Henri Data Validation Summary Quanterra Project Number: 4481242 Level IV validation has been completed by Quanterra-FAS. Data validation was performed using the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) "National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (1994)". Specifically, the following data were reviewed: f— _________PARAMETER__________MATRIX # SAMPLES VGA by GC/MS Soil 22 EPA CLP OLM01.8 Water 1 _____________________________Blanks______4_____ VOA = Volatile Organic Analysis GC/MS = Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry EPA = Environmental Protection Agency CLP = Contract Laboratory Program The following paragraphs highlight the key findings of this validation effort: I. Volatile Organic Analyses (VOA) by GC/MS Data qualifier were applied to the data for the following factors: 1. High Percent Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) - The %RSD for chloroethane exceeded 30% in one initial calibration. Associated chlorethene results were qualified as estimated (J, UJ). Belinda Price fyuanterra £™™rw April 10,1995 2. High Response Factor fRF) - Some continuing calibration checks indicate that chloroemethane, 2-butanone, acetone and vinyl chloride exceeded the percent difference (%D) criteria (>25%). Associated results were qualified as estimated (J, UJ). 3. Blank Contamination - Several compounds were detected in the method blanks, trip blanks, field blanks and equipment rinsates. The "5x/l Ox Rule" was applied and associated sample results less than five/ten times the blank concentration were qualified as non-detect (U). 4. Dilutions - Several samples reported tetrachloroethene results exceeding the calibration range in the original sample. Dilutions were run and the tetrachloroethene result should be reported from the diluted analysis. 5. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSP) - No MS/MSP was reported with this package. There was no requent for the lab to run a MS/MSD on this project. Batch quality control (QC) analysis can be pulled if needed. 6. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) - TICs have been qualified as "NJ" for presumptive evidence of a material present at an estimated concentration. Full details of the validation may be found in the report entitled, "Data Validation: Volatiles by GC/MS", located in Attachment A. The raw data packages will be returned to you for your use and maintenance in the project file. We will maintain in our files, copies of this summary and the individual validation reports. Please let me know if you have any questions. Attachments cc: John Ragsdale, w/o attachment FAS Project Files Attachment "A" KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTA>S-ll-95(3«liwnyD3/El .,.., p.. ...j,.,,.., ,., f.}...,, En\ironm-nul Quanterra Incorporated 5815 Middlebrook Pike Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 615 588-6401 Telephone 615 584-43 15 Fax March 9, 1995 BELINDA PRICE IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE 312 DIRECTORS DRIVE KNOXVILLE, TN 37923 Re: 1'HENRY ".0. = Dear BELINDA PRICE: This -onfirms the receipt of. samples for analysis on March 9, 1995 at our QUANTERRA-KNOXVILLE laboratory. These samples were received in good "ondition unless otherwise noted on an attached Condition Upon Receipt variance form. The samples were logged into our tracking system work ">rder =3034. Please review the attached outline for samples receivt and test assignments for any discrepancies. If you discover any probler please call me at (615) 588-6401. We arrreciate the opportunity to support your analytical requirements. Your" "-epcrt will be sent to you at the above address on or before Mar-:: :C, 1595 unless advised otherwise. ._ Acr-ir., if vou have any Questions or comments on our performance, clear--.- feel free to call" me at (615) 588-6401. Sincerelv, REBECIA CHARLES Project Manager QUANTERRA-KNOXVILLE e&^fa*^ March 9, 1995 Client: Project: Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS '-Jork Order #: 3034 IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE L'HENRY ClieiT- Sample ID 'ITSBOI-05 .0 ITSEQi-10.0 ITSB01-14.5 EXSOI EXS^Z EXSC2 TB02C—5 Lab ID QC AE5074 AE5075 AE5076 AE5077 AE5078 AE5079 AE5080 AE5081 AE5082 Test Description DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) REPORT DELIVERABLE-COA (CERTIFICATE) CLP 90/91 DISPOSAL - TUT OO8 GOO8 •White: To accompany samples Yellow: field copy 'See back of form for special instructions. •EH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Project Name /- '. ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD (cont.)* .1 i . • A ' , c , I. v<, Project No. '(<"-! &'$<-'>• <~-<r.>&. i v'f Reference Document No.30 J"/5o Page Z of 2- Samples Shipment Date 3/7/95 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ONE CONTAINER PER LINE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| Sample'4 Sample 15 Number Description/Type TRd^fc^S i ! Ll>4l F- f> .,' 1 Date/Time ' 6 Collected !.'< .'"75 / „' ', Vt:> Container ' ' Type ,' /,.-.. <('(tt'j • i i .. .. Sample 1 8 Volume I ^ WlHl Pre-19 servative :i: £ Requested Testing 20 Program c ^ r 3 »,'£>£. 3M- Condition on 21 Receipt * •' ' . / -• • , ., ' • A- / / ! Disposal 22 Record No. 1 invtronmfntal Senictf Quartterra Incorporated 5815 Middlebrook Pike Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 615 588-6401 Telephone 615 584-4315 Fax March 13, 1995 BELINDA PRICE IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE 312 DIRECTORS DRIVE KNOXVILLE, TN 37923 Re : L ' HENRY P.O. # Dear BELINDA PRICE: This confirms the receipt of samples for analysis on March 13, 1995 at our QUANTERRA -KNOXVI LLE laboratory. These samples were received in good condition unless otherwise noted on an attached Condition Upon Receipt variance form. The samples were logged into our tracking system a Work Order #3067. Please review the attached outline for samples received and test assignments for any discrepancies. If you discover any problem please call me at (615) 588-6401. We appreciate the opportunity to support your analytical requirements. Your report will be sent to you at the above address on or before __ March 25, 1995 unless advised otherwise. ^ '• Again, if you have any questions or comments on our performance, please feel free to call me at (615) 588-6401. Sincerely, REBECCA CHARLES Project Manager QUANTERRA- KNOXVILLE TUT OOf March 13, 1995 Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Project: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS Work Order #: 3067 Client Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description EXS23 AE5446 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS24 AE5447 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS25 AE5448 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS26 AE5449 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS27 AE5450 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS28 AE5451 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS29 AE5452 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS30 AE5453 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS31 AE5454 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) TUT COS OO12 March 13, 1995 Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Project: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS Work Order #: 3067 Client Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description EXS31 AE5454 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01" CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS32 AE5455 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01 CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS33 AE5456 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01 CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS34 AE5457 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE (VOA) TIC'S (OLM' "" CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS35 AE545S DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01 CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS27DU AE5459 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01. CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS TB-MAR9-95 AE5460 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01, CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EQUIPMENT RINSE AE5461 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS FB-MAR9-95 AE5462 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) TUT 008 0013 March 13, 1995 Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Project: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS Work Order #: 3067 Client Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description FB-MAR9-95 AE5462 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DCW-MAR10-95 AE5463 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS —^ INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION COC NO. Project Name/No. Sample Team lumbers Profit Center No. 3 Project Manager4 Purchase Oder No.6 Required Rep'.'t Date 1 Bill to5 XT ANALYSIS REQUEST AND 0003546- CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD .,-.., Soi\ K«**t*«. Samples Shipment Date 7 M.k<- 6»«U «/*•-> a n * Lab Destination ° Lab Contact 9 B«J<y cL*r{t£ Project Contact/Phone ]28P/£l5/tfO -3Z// Report to.toXl Carrier/Waybill No. 13 312- Dvi eference Document No. 4 165 Page 1 of Z. -iik«. ^x L« for fa t»5. ONE CONTAINER PER LINE • ^ r*fj w^v *iv -*-^ f' ^r- >i^ • • •-— w /l^ft, .^ItM^v. ^^^ Bampla 1 Number Sample 15 an/Type EX6Z5 EK530 Date/Time Collected 16 ?7?R5" Container TVP« WI5 \gff g r^r iws So 1 7JBemple1 Volume ^SS v/ 4U^ ort eervetim Coel Requested Testing 20 Progrem CLP Condition on| 21 Reoejptx') Diepoeel? Record No. Special Instructions: 23 Possible Hazard Identification: 24 Non-hazard y Flammable _J Skin Irritant J| Poison B 'J Unknown ' J Sample Disposal: 25 spoa: ^ Return to Client !J Dispdbal by Lab/54 Archive (n Turnaround Time Required: 26 Normal M Rush J QC Level:27 iU^-!^ Project Specific (spe 1 . Relinquished by Date: Time: 1. Received by 28 Date: Time: 2. Relinquished by (Signature/AHiliaUon) Date: Time: 2. Received by ISignaturc/ Affiliation) Date TitTIP' 3. Relinquished by (Signature/ Affiliation) Date: Time: 3. Received by (Signature/ Affiliation) 9- Date Timp- Comments:29 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Project Name L l4-t^ut~t ANALYSIS kgQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD (cont.J* PrnjRctNn • ' ' l ' > Reference Document No."1 Y Page 1 of Z Samples Shipment Dntr Of\lE COIMTAIIMER PER LINE Sample" Number Sample '5 Description/Type Date /Time1'1 Collected Container ' ' Type Sample 1 fl Volume Pre-19 •ervathie Requested Testing 20 Program Condition on ?' Receipt Disposal '' Record No. EXS3I |/Qg- to* rf nub i 95 lO'.IC? 3/^/95 Loot CLP Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP of DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MS (CLP) Project Name: L Number QCLevet Lab ID: ReponNo: Number and Type of Samples: Special Instruaions: 0 Holding Times Field Sample No. Matrix Date Collected Preservation Analysis Date Comments JCw :> v" / NOW* Recommended Action: I SJI$ &**f**A Jj(#tM fa Reviewed By/Dmtc QA i»l Rev., Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page of Instrument Performance: Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) Standard Check if'OK* Recommeoded Action: III) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form VIA present? 9* 1. Calculation Check - Mean RRF (minimum 1 compound per calibration) | Calibration i Date i il/l\~/hy =5//«Af i ! —— — ^ GC/MS ID 2T2>(?/}- (?S2p4- , — . — - — Ret / / =• Matrix S0/C £>/£^ »• "^ Filename *K7>//<7, 57,^3, W^_ Q[QH°I tOlt^Vfe - ———— ' ————— ————— Selected Compound $unnmj&*j^ S^«-*-<— - —————— * Mean RRF <W> o,c-«*f . ——— — — Agree with Lab Report ? t.JU»^ —— *p^ —————— —— L^± ———— xv y»Ar 2. Any Mean RRF < 0.05 ? (Ifyes'thenlistO Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP III) Calibration (Continued! * A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSO (Minimum 1 compound per calibration, nay me same a* for mean RRF) Calibration Date GC/MS ID Compound Percent RSD Agree with Lab Repon ? 4. Anv% RSD > 30%? (Ifyes'thenlst:) Recommended Actioa: B) Continuing Calibration Form VIIA present? ye^ 1. Any RRF < 0.05 ? Standard Fflename (If-yea'then list): CaUbntkxi Date GC/MS ID Compound RRF Reviewed By/Date: Q A Coacuneace/Date: Volatiles by GC/MS • CLP Page ^ of / u tin Calibration (Continued) "N B) Continuina Calibration (Continued) 2. Calculation Check - % D_ (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Standard Filename W5^5/sT Qsc3f/ • _^- _^----^ Ref. / CaUbration Date V'"SAl" / sy/y/Q'T .*-— • ^~ 3. Any % D > 25%? Standard Filename iV&?:3A"~ I k -y OSC?'"/ I ^v ^x ^^^ ^^ Calibration Date 3Af/9f ( •^ s/x/Ar j \^ ^ ^^^ ^ GC/MS ID JTsct?/? Compound ftiemnati^u.. I Q*£o A- fy&rL fa*L*t»*- ^—H ^~~^~ k&3 J ^ — - ^~~^ ~~~-—— (If "yea' then Iht) Compound 02£#t^trffcM. c< ~ 9ttft*/JV*A- iLJKJ^l rUrv* vfrrtTt 1 1_ V-*As*yt. CftiUviAt ^ ^^*^ ^*^ ^^ %D £7,7 -?C/C7 «ff;s VP.P ^^> ^x^"" -*"/cs)^^r ^^ % D Agree with Lab Report ? /6'6 t ^/JLOr- C?'7 tjt/i.^~. —~~~^~ —~\~~~~^ — • — ""^ Aj 3/ #>/*}) ^ Recommended ActioK - J Reviewed By/Dtie: QACoBcantacc/DMe: XMyll*! I TUT O08 0020 Voiatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page *r of / \\n Blanks 1. Form IV A present? 2. Method blank reportecLfor each matrix, concentration level, GC/MS system as appropriate? If no, explain: _________________________________________ 3. Any common lab contaminants detected? «#4 (if "yes" then list:) Blank ID V/BOWt(fl% iVR«^A€6ZV7 GC/MS ID <^2fA CTSJt?/} Date Run 3//</hr s KM" " Concentration (specify units) : Methylene Chloride Z^ Acetone *ViK5 d J ' Toluene 2-butanone • I i i 4. Other TCLs or TICs detected? Blank ID GC/MS ID -V Date Run V (If •yes" then list:) Compound C-T l><i~7 Concentration (specify units} 5. Any contaminants detected in FB.vTB, or ER samples? Concentration (specify units) Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to "ND* based on associated lab blank contamination in Section IV. 5. Recommended Actioa: V) Surrogate Recovery 1. Form IIA present? All samples listed? Entries agree with raw data? (If 'no' for any answer explain below.) Reviewed By/Due r !X Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Surrogate Recovery (Continued) Air method blank surrogates within limits? Page Q of jO 2. Any runs with orn» (1) or more recoveries outside limits? ~k6~~ (if 'yes' then list:) Sample ID Surrogate Compound — — Original % Recovery U-— "^ Re-Run % Recovery ^~- -—— ^ /^ J/3o/?3" „— — ^^" —— _-^— -6oifiments — --^^ j (If 'no' explain below:) Recommended Action: VO Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates 1. Number of pairs analyzed: Matrix: Frequency: 2. Form III A present? M/A- soil water/ Results entries gree ies ^ree with rraw data? % R, RPD Calculations OK? 3. All % R, RPD within limits? (If 'no' then list) Sample ID DUDB %R MS/MSD Comments Actioat Reviewed By/D»lc QA Coeeantaee/OuK. Votatiles by GC/MS - CLP VII) Field Duplicates - 1 . Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? Matrix Original Sample No. Duplicate Sample^o. Matrix 2. Overall frequency: Page "? of_/ (if 'yes' then list:) Original Sample No. Ouplii 3. Comments (Evaluate RPDs for positive paj VIII) Internal Standards Performance 1 . Form VIIIA present? : Areas/RT agree with raw data? 2. All sample/blank IS areas within limits? List exceptions: 3. All sample/blank IS RTs within 30 seconds of standard IS RT? List exceptions: Recommeoded Action: Reviewed By/Due: QA< i LIT VolatilesbyGC/MS-CLP Page B of JO Compound Identification and Quantitation Check if "yes* Sample Number £&SD 1 / / / / Compound and Result Reported (Form'1 A) <ai\ Wi-Vv oUJb^Ji / / / / / / / / / / RT Match L/^~ x x x Spectra Match ^>-— X X x Calculatiot OK " dS— -" X X X Qualified Result (if different) Comments X* / / X x x x ^>^h^" x x x X j Recommended Action: Rev»e»cd By/Due QA Caacumawe/DMe Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP : Page ^ of _£•: (X) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have all peaks that should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? 2. Any TICs found in samples also in associated blanks? 3. Are reasonable identifications reported? 4. Any TCL compounds reported as TICs? Recommended Action; XI) System Performance Check for and explain any of the following: 1. Abrupt RIC baseline shift ___ 2. High background or RT shifts: ___ 3. Baseline rise at high temperature: 4. Extraneous i 5. Loss of peak 6. Peak tailing or spMting: / Recommended Actioa: Reviewed By/Due ({jgjXy*- 5Oa/^J_____________QAO Volatiies by GC/MS - CLP Page /Q of /£> XII) Overall Assessment /• 3 3, i. < Ol/lWl RevuKXi >-iO 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILL'E___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— "7 K r»Q *5 ___ 67-64-1 —— —— 75-15-0— ——— 75-35-4 —— —— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— c.i a a *3 _. « 107-06-2 ———— "7Q_Q"5— *5 — — — — 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— -7 n o *7 c 10061-01-5 —— 124-48-1 ———— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 7Q— 34— 5 —————— / — / •— ' ^ «-rf j_u o y u /—————• 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride n>l^v« ^Wlic —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1,2-Dichloroethane —— 2 -Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane .i_*w£ll^C£HC£ —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1, 1, 2 ,2-Tetr achloroethane —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) ••- 12 12 12 12 2 11 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 280 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U BJ U U U U U U U J U U U U U U U E U U U U U U •—— — ,^— . /a ( uu f "~~~ j ftr &PO iau. FORM I VOA ^3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE______________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST . CONC . Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) G___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01DL SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077D CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____-U-9- I.Ce Soil Aliquot Volume: ____(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83 -9 ———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______,_ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroe thane______ 540-59-0——————1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6—-————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————l, 2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5—————cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________,_ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_______\</ 21 21 21 21 2 9 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 140 21 21 21 21 21 21 Uu Uu BDJ BDJ U Uuu u.. u u uu u u u u u u uu u u u D u u u u u u mo t FORM I VOA 3/90 r^t IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) G _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01DL SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____Jr-ftr Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q TUT OO8 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS02 SDG No.: EXSQ1 Lab Sample ID: AE5078 Lab File ID: AE5078 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1... 0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG FORM I VOA .(uL) 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— n f **> *} ^ _ _ 75-27-4 ————— "7D_o-7_ c ___ _ 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride ACS L-OIiS —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, l-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methyl-2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene j__ WAA jr .Li-JCm* s£llt_> • —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) ,j/ 12 12 12 12 2 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 18 12 12 12 12 120 12 12 12 \Z X 12 3 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U .. U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U & H U J 3. I 3/90 TUT O08 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ..ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS02 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5078 Lab File ID: AE5078 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST . CONC . Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS03 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5079 Lab File ID: AE5079 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 7 4-83-9———————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_ 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________~ 107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________________ 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total) ~r.». 12 12 12 12 1 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 54 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U \r SM FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. EXS03 /""""""Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Contract: LHENRI Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3034 SAS No. : ______ SDG No. : EXS01 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G____ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5079 Lab File ID: AE5079 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Number TICs found: Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG (uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC >/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ____ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) V 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 —— —— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ----- 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— /o o / o — — — 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ———— - 124-48-1 — —— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride f\\f^^m L*\*siic —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene _, —— 1 , l-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , l , 2 -Trichlor oethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methy 1-2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2 -Tetr achlor oethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene • —— Styrene • —— Xylene (total) \;/ 1 12 12 12 2 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 270 12 1 12 12 12 12 J U U U BJ BJ U U U U U .. U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E UJ U U U U ir 1SV.U UVJL IXU 1 >^ e«pcr ia,\A IT 13.U! FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE NO. EXS04 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab, Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04DL SDG No.: EX501 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE508QD Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____ 1,0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG (uL) 74-87-3 ———————Chlor omethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_____< 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane • 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_._____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________(__ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total) . >.- 20 20 20 20 20 9 20 20 20 20 3 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 100 20 20 20 20 20 20 Uu Uuu BDJ U U U U BDJ U U U U uuuuu uuuuu JL_ Jfii FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, ;_ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _Q Contract: LHENRI SAS No. : ______ EXS04DL SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS05 SDG No. : EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5081 Lab File ID: AE5081 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) V 74-87-3 ————————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————l, l-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————l,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————D ibr omoch lor omethane_____ 79-00-5———————l, l, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________. 12 12 12 12 2 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 100 12 12 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U " U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 1-vlX 100 5/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ___ EXS05 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5081 Lab File ID: AE5081 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q ru"f 008 O04O FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ______ ITSB01050 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5074 Lab File ID: AE5074 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 7 4-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5 ——————— 1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6—————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_____________v 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)___________ 12 12 12 12 3 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 120 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 008 004 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01050 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5074 Lab File ID: AE5074 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST . CONC . Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 008 OO42 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01100 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5075 Lab File ID: AE5075 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) V 74-87-3———————Chloromethane____________ 7 4-83-9———————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1————————Acetone__________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_ 67-66-3————————Chloroform________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3————————2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6———————1, l, l-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5—————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2————————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5————————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)___________\i 12 12 12 12 3 17 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U BJ U ' U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 008 OO43 *>f IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ib Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01100 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5075 Lab File ID: AE507-5 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST . CONC . Q FORM I VOA-TIC •/90 TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. __.6 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ______ ITSB01145 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5076 Lab File ID: AE5076 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/K6 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_______ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————l, l, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropehe_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methy 1-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l, 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total) 11 11 11 11 1 6 11 11 11 11 I 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(uL) V U U. llUv' illX FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. __6 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01145 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5076 Lab File ID: AE5076 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 53.0 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TB030695 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5082 Lab File ID: AE5082 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/15/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3———————Chloromethane_____________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride____________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_________ 67-64-1———————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_________L 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3———————Chloroform_______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride^________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane_________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6———•——Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2———————Bromoform________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone________________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetr achlor oethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene___________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________, _ )_2o-7—————Xylene (total)__________• _/ 10 10 10 10 2 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .(UL) I/ FORM I VOA 3/90 008 O047 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 53.0 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TB030695 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE508S Lab File ID: AE5082 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/15/95 Dilution Factor: ____l. 0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC." Q FORM I VOA-TIC TUT 3/90 008 Votatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page. of DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MS (CLP) Project Name: Number: QC Level: Lab No: Number and Type of Samples: Special Instructions: 1) Holding Times j Field I Sample No. Matrix Date Collected Preservation Analysis Date Comments \iWnWU&v< ^te-r /-/*•-•? 5" \Oex>lJ00cC' /-Z/-95 M/ VL s-tf-'iS \cK$-2-?PU \ V ?- Notes: Recommended Action: Reviewed Bv/Date: Q A Concuircnce/Ptte: Voiatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page ^ of DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MS (CLP) Project Name: Number: QC Level: Lab ID: Special Instructions: Repon No: Number and Type of Samples: 1) Holding Times Field Sample No. Matrix £X5X^ fjL'TL- £"X"53i/ j£X555 ^MAlL^ 5 'TByflffi'i^ \ h*i / •e^f vL- i ; i / Notes: \j£v*[j^ !'** Date Collected Preservation 5*-(7- ^^ ^^7 <7 ^ \ 3-c/ j -^5 s OX'10 / '•:///£/ "jtsi o'c ///cf Analysis Date J'/T2-^ Comments '3~-j?- £iS _?"~*y 25"*'*^^i *~7 -^ / &fCT ?-~z/-f5 ~»- 1 -^ ft Y \<-U$A *<*' Recommended Action: ^ Reviewed By/Dtte: Q A Coocuiraee/Date: / Ol IMt R«vu TUT O08 005O Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP of II) Instrument Performance: Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) Standard Ckeckif'OK* BFB Run Date 7^/7 -fV t5- /? - 7^ o^'ft '75 GOMS ID ~t5&&A — \ — Form V A Preaent? iX V I/ Data Transcribed? X is *X Significant Figures? x i/ is' Ratio Calculations? x is ' i/ Background Subtnctions? r /,' I/' Meets Specifications? [ \s f /"- Comment Recommended Action: III) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form VI A present? 1/lS 1. Calculation Check - Mean RRF (minimum 1 compound per calibration) \ Calibration ' Date ^/ '• !?•' tf -$&$ 3- 1$' \^ l-io-q^ GOMS ID *jTWA \t- Q'outA Ref.| 7-| Matrix 5^i ^- a u;^W FUename k&lllfy - £ kXLO?/*il.2,3 J -5" (£f6>3l 5 liitilKW-ltffr Selected Compound tjl/l?f<7/heJ4i&'*>£. — $ —— Mean RRF ,?.?£ .'fZK , $t)°l Agree with Lab Report ? 1/tfS ^'5 ^S 2. Any Mean RRF < 0.05 ? £, (Ifyes* then list:) Compound Mean RRF GC/MS ID Calibration Date Comments Reviewed By/Date: QA Co AJtt TUT O08 DO5I Volatiles by QC/MS • CLP — HI) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSD Pagej/_of__ (Minimum 1 compound per calibration, may me ume as tor mean RRF) ! Calibration ' Date i ////T/9V : 3//0Ar 3/W/5S" i 1 i GC/MS ID Xsct'/l- -TfDfrf- Ps&rA Compound '<U*u2&A*a/Hg_< /7f>i~ J!~ la&j. Percent RSD £./ ^r 5T7 Agree with Lab Report ? ^ i.** ———— fr* 2—— ———————— 9^ </ 4. Any % RSD > 30% ? (If-yes'then fee) Compound $&U€Z&M- '-— —-^ GOMS ID Q2>M r^——^ Calibration Date 3/>o/?f ^^-^ Percent RSD 3? . £" ^ "—— ^ Comments —— —— - — — ' —— TtT <//$ft'S~~ Recommended Action: or B) Continuing Calibration Form VIIA present? (fA- 1 . Any RRF < 0.05 ? "V (If "yes' then list): Standard Filename . ^^^ ^**^ ^^^ Calibration Date _^~- ^^^^ GOMS ID _^^-*** -^•^ Compound ——— ___-= _^^—-^*^t yj$/9f •\ RRF i — — -**" j I i j j l i Reviewed By/Date WM-^L //V^T" QA Conewtence/Dtte: /g4^A&0*-' J/^J^^c^^t' — ^ '-S~~* 2-J TUT COS OOS2 Volatites Dy (JWMS - rage or III) Calibration (Continued) B) Continuing Calibration (Continued) 2. Calculation Check • % D Standard Filename Ref. (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Calibration Date W^P^"? / 3/J7/9T w.sa*;fcg V&SO 3 1^ QS O-^*^ 2>//'sy <?.5' 3//9/9J5 3/<A//9^ 3. Any % D > 25%? Standard Filename <A/'SO 3/7 j ) I \Y i ° V Calibration Date 5//7/J*" N i * 4/ ^^ ^*^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ *^ GOMS ID x&eA- z^sco A ^"S"<wA -ase^a^ Compound 5w>*V47mCjij»XJU O^/^aJSt^j^ l/Vn«J ^Vlpr^c5^. StA> ^CSeT-Vjk <X (If "yes* then list:) Compound #£w*uk~«_- to^it ^-/SttZU^x-*, Axtbok i ^ -/SA^BLAJSX^ ^^*^ ^^~*' ^>^^ tfifa^ *^~ %D 32- S" ^"- V -^'i'C 57- 6 yp'2-^* ^^^ \ % D Agree with Lab Repor 2^13 /i^J. "S">5 i vjjL^ ^l (« s^s — S ' *t* ! tijj \ \J 1 1 ^ Recommended Actiom: Reviewed By/Date: ^s-% Votatiles by QC/MS - CLP Page of IV) Blanks 1. Form IV A present?_ 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concentration level, QC/MS system as appropriate? toa If no, explain: "~ ._____________________________________^^ 3. Any common lab contaminants detected? Blank ID GOMS ID Date Roo (If "yes" then list:) Methylene Chloride -HJ Concentration (specify units) Acetone i Toluene 4. Other TCLs or TICs detected? Blank ID GC/MS ID V Date Run ^r 4^ ( if >«• then list:) Compound Concentration (specify units) • •" " V ' ~~ V ^V__ __ f>/.z.;i~7-&i/v*au<»r>-—•• 5. Any contaminants detected in FB. TB. or ER samples? 2-butanone i Blank ID ! '^^"2 •V-Lj^' 0 C""" ^-73/n/TT*' ' i TSAtttMr ' x^ 1^ Date Collected .3 A /s -r 3A /^ j" 3/ f / 5L^»- Concentration (specify units) Methytene Chloride /n/t -Sir I fl.-V- Acetone ^i<i /C 8 J •yXh/L 2fr ^^jp Toluene Other (specify) //Z-£«a&v&»W /j 2 ijV.f {iT^rt,. « /j t /^tc (J^Wti^JL^.'rli j/J-^V^tj/ocTt^ Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to *ND" based on associated lab blank contamination in Section IV. S. Recommended Actioa: V) Surrogate Recovery 1. Form IIA present? Entries agree with raw data? All samples listed?_ tivtr (If "no" for any answer explain below.) Reviewed By/Dtte: QACaacutTcacc/Dtic: Volatiles by QC/MS - CLP V) Surrogate Recovery (Continued) 2. Any runs with on* (t) or more recoveries outside limits? 1*3 (if 'yes' : Sample I ID I i i ! Surrogate Compound Original % Recovery Re-Run % Recovery Comments ^--—^ ffi" <S/*Af- —— • ^—^ -^^ \ then list:) i —— -r All method blank surrogates within limits? (If "no" explain below:) Recommended Action: VO Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates 1. Number of pairs analyzed: Results entries agree with raw data? 2. Form III A pre % R, RPD Calculation* 3. All % R, RPD within limits? (If'no'then list) Recommended Action /xAUcX iT rstaJ^J* , fe£tcK 0(L ^. Reviewed By/Due QA Concurrence/Pat*: x^. VolatilesbyGC/MS-CLP Page of VII) Field Duplicates _ 1 . Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable?, Matrix ^^ ^ Original Sample No. ^ ^^ ^s^ Duplicate, Sample-tfoT 0^ (if -yes" then list:) Matrix ^S' ^ Original Sample No. ^* ^^ Duplicate Sample Nq^., ^^~^ 2. Overall frequency: 3. Comments (Evaluate RPDs for positive paired analytes): VHP Internal Standards Performance 1 . Form VIIIA present? : Areas/RT agree with raw data? 2. All sample/blank IS areas within limits? List exceptions: 3. All sample/blank IS RTs within 30 seconds of standard IS RT? List exceptions:________ hiIw^____________ Recommended Action: Reviewed By/Pate Q A Coocumace/Dur Piyift*! R«vi»9n V TUT 003 O056 VolatilesbyGC/MS-CLP Page of Compound identification and Quantitation Check if 'yes* Sample Number 1 —————— f/ j // ^ —— Compound and Result Reported (Form I A) > / / / / / / / / / / / f RT Match / / / / Spectra Match / / / Calcuiatiot OK / / / Qualified Result (if diffpriht) Commea9/ / / S*s / flWf / / / , i i i 1 j 1 I J i i i I ; Recommended Action: o. By/Due QA Coocmrence/Dtus tr OLll/fl Heaven >« VolatilesbyGC/MS-CLP Page /Oof (X) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have all peaks that should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? 2. Any TICs found in samples also in associated blanks? 3. Are reasonable identifications reported? 4. Any TCL compounds reported as TICs? Recommended Action; XI) System Performance Check for and explain any of the following: 1. Abrupt RIC baseline shift ___ 2. High background or RT shifts: ___ 3. Baseline rise at high temperature:___ 4. Extraneous peefcK ___ 5. Loss of peak nsetution: 6. Peak tailing or spitting: ^ Recommended Action: Reviewed By/Due: TUT OO8 OO5S voiatnes oy - ou- rage t XII) Overall Assessment I Of, Zp, &. Ol/tWl Reviiicn J-iO 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNQXVILLE__________ Lab Code: fTSTU Case No.: 306? Matrix: (soil/water)"WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRj SAS No.: ____ DCWMAR1095 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5463 Lab File ID: AE5463 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____5.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 ——————Chlor omethane__________ 74-83 -9 ——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodich lor omethane^_________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-TriChloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7——:——Xylene (total)_________ 6 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 J U U U U BJ U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 003 O06O IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _(3 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ DCWMAR1095 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5463 Lab File ID: AE5463 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: _ 5.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER NAME I! EST. CONC. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /""NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ . Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "ftATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _______ EQUIPMENTRIN SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5461 Lab File ID: AE5461R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3———————Chl or ome thane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————l, i-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform______________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 101 4 1 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ JuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA .(uL) V JT 1OUI TU1 COS OO62 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N< Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _Q Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EQUIPMENTRI1 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5461 Lab File ID: AE5461R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 0 0 8 o o A ."f. 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO /"*\Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 'SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G,_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS23 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: _____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-2 5-2 ———————Bromof orm____________~ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene _____ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________~ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene______________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA •c- u U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) I V 3/90 TUT O08 0064 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N< Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS23 ______ SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: AE5446 03/13/95 03/17/95 ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL; CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS23DL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446D Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. (UL) Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _______________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,l,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4 ———————Bromodichlor omethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43 -2 ———————Benzene_________________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 60 60 60 60 12 22 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 290 60 60 60 60 60 60 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U •V" FORM I VGA 3/90 TUT CO8 O066 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS23DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: _____.(uL1, CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil /water) gQIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS24 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5447 Lab File ID: AE4557R % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) CAS NO, COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane _______________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone_________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroe thane______ 78-93-3———————2 -Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_________________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 3 9 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 21 12 1 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U .(uL) FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OOS 0068 A IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS24 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5447 Lab File ID: AE4557R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL, CONCENTRATION UNITS: GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE __________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS25 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5448 Lab File ID: AE5448 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: . GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———:——Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————D ibromochl or omethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2———————Benzene _______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-D ichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4 ——————Ethy Ibenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 114 13 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 190 11 11 11 11 11 11 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ B U U U U U U u- u U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(uL) 3/90 TUT DOB OO70 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE I Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS25 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5448 Lab File ID: AE5448 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNQXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G. _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ______ EXS26 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride "" 67-64-1———————Acetone____________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide ~ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3 ———————Chloroform_____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————-Bromoform____________"__ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 5 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 800 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U —' « ^ Jr- V XT I FORM I VGA 3/90 TUT OO8 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS26 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL, CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT oos 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ITAS-KNOXVTLLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Contract: LHENRI EXS26DL SAS No. : SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449D2 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. (UL) Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone_(___ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________| 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————l, 1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2———————Benzene _________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 60 60 60 60 60 37 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 300 60 60 60 60 60 60 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT COS OO74 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS26DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS ===::==;= NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 'TUT 008 O075 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, /*""*•% Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G._ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: UfENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————— - 75-01-4 ——————— • 75-00-3 ——————— - 75-09-2 ——————— • 67-64-1 ——————— - 75-15-0 ——————— - 75-35-4 ——————— - 75-34-3 ——————— • 540-59-0 —————— - 67-66-3 ——————— - 107-06-2 —————— - 71-55-6 ——————— - 56-23-5 ——————— • 75-27-4 ——————— • 10061-01-5 ———— • 79-01-6 ——————— • 124-48-1 —————— • 79-00-5 ——————— • "» <• A *» *\ 10061-02-6 ———— • •* n? *\ f *\ 108-10-1 —————— • 591-78-6 —————— 127-18-4 —————— 79-34-5 ——————— i no ..a fi_i _______ 108-90-7 —————— 100-41-4 —— —— — 100-42-5 —————— 1330-20-7 —— —— -Chloromethane -Bromomethane -Vinyl Chloride -Chloroethane -Methylene Chloride -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide -1, 1-Dichloroethene -1 , 1-Dichloroethane -1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ -Chloroform -1 , 2-Dichloroethane -2-Butanone -1,1, 1-Tri chloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane -1 , 2-Dichloropropane -cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene -Tr i ch 1 or oethene -Dlbromochloromethane -1 , 1, 2-Trichloroethane -Benzene -trans-l , 3-Dichloropropene ___ -Bromoform -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone -2-Hexanone -Tetrachloroethene -1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ -Toluene -Chlorobenzene -Ethylbenzene -Styrene -Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 4 26 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 980 12 4 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U UJ U U U .XL ——— E UJ U U U U auTi uu. J&IC AK >' iaw: JAU. >/ <2cr uui fy»' 1*U M:T Uu 4 FORM I VOA oos IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) §OIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _1 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 16.40 EST. CONC. 6 Q J FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water)"SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450D CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l, l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Di chloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 61 61 61 61 16 38 61 61 61 61 61 61 7 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 850 61 61 61 61 61 61 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U DJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N Lab Name: ITAS -KNOXVI LLE _______ _ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) -SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _ 0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OOS 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, >*sLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ -- Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DU SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane 74-83-9 ——————— Bromomethane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane 75-09-2 ——————— Methy lene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon bisulfide 75-35-4 ——————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone 71-55-6 ——————— 1, 1, l-Trichlordethane 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane 78-87-5 ——————— 1,2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5 ———— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 124-48-1 —————— Dibromochloromethane 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene 10061-02-6 ———— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ 75-25-2 ——————— Bromoform 108-10-1 — • ———— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5 ——————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 1 25 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 790 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U E UJ U U U U la \Q •asA V IA \ U /-U •i\ I* / / fcaOofV AT 13.UI FORM I VOA TO" 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SiOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DU SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l,o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 104-76-7 COMPOUND NAME 1 -HEXANOL , 2 -ETHYL- RT 16.37 EST. CONC. 17 Q JN FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 0<)8 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Contract: LHENRI EPA SAMPLE NO. EXS27DUDL Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 SAS No.: SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane________________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone____________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———•——Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2 ———————Bromof orm______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4-—————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachlor oethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————styrene ____________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 59 59 59 59 12 23 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 570 59 59 59 59 59 59 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D TT U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT COS 0082 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N* Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (jnm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _______ EXS27DUDL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 rUT ooa: 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTO Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS28 SDG No.: DCW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone ______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————l,l-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3———————Chloroform________________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93 -3——————2 -Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4——————Br omod ich lor ome thane___________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benzene________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75-25-2——————Bromoform_________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-7 8 -6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)____________ 11 11 11 11 4 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 400 11 11 11 11 11 11 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 008 O084 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS28 ______ SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: AE5451 03/13/95 03/17/95 ____ 1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL. CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 008 QQBl 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /"NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS28DL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) §OIL Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) Lab File ID: AE5451D Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) GAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane __________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone______________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————l,l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1, l,l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————D ibr omoch lor omethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene__________________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 56 56 56 56 12 19 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 210 56 56 56 56 56 56 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u FORM I VOA 3/90 Tin O08 O086 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS28DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL, CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: _____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane _________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride ~ 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1, l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________" 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1, l, 1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—•—————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 5 26 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 610 12 4 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U lawr -sw\I FORM I VOA t~. 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ • Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) ?OIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone____________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————l, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform______________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, i-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 59 59 59 59 59 43 59 59 59 59 59 59 8 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 150 59 59 59 59 59 59 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U DJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U D IT U U U U U FORM I VOA IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) ?QIL Sample vrt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _p_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE NC EXS29DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: Lab File ID: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: AE5452 AE5452D2 03/13/95 03/19/95 i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL, CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) &DIL Sample vrt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS30 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5453 Lab File ID: AE5453D /~*v GAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————l, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————l, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l/2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 57 57 57 57 14 17 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 8 57 57 57 57 57 1100 57 57 57 57 57 57 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) L/ FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE N Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS30 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5453 Lab File ID: AE5453D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l__. 0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS31 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9 ———————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone______________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6—————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_____________~ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 5 19 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 3 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1300 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U .(uL) FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE N< EXS31 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9C TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS31DL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: l.o (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454D2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone ______________ 75-15-0———•———Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_____ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 61 61 61 61 61 28 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 560 61 61 61 61 61 61 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U__ U U U U U U FORM I VOA TUT OOQ OO96 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: TTAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ____ EXS31DL ______ SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: AE5454D2 03/13/95 03/19/95 1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL, GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT DOS 0097 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /**NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 15OIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS32 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5455 Lab File ID: AE5455R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane __________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone _________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————l, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2———————Benzene______ 10061-02-6————trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 3 5 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 38 11 4 11 11 11 11 Uu Uu BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Uuuuu uJuuuu )U 3* 1|U-*ir nu I FORM I VOA TIT 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS32 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5455 Lab File ID: AE5455R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL/ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /"""""•ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS33 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5456 Lab File ID: AE5456 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone _______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1, l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 7 8-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 2 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 2 11 11 11 11 31 11 1 11 11 11 11 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U UJ U U U U .(UL) V IVA^:t w UU3" . I 3J \\\\ 13- nu.I FORM I VOA TT 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ____ EXS33 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5456 Lab File ID: AE5456 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL; CAS NUMBER ^~ — *»^— — •~*^~ JH^^^^M*— — ^^— -mill — ji^^—n*^— COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT COS O1O1 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ # Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water)"SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS34 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5457 Lab File ID: AE5457 GAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ___i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________[ 107-06-2——————l, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene ___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 2 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 170 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U •--1*i FORM I VOA 3/90 00g 0102 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL. Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE NC EXS34 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5457 Lab File ID: AE54S7 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i. o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9C 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/raL) G _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS35 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5458 Lab File ID: AE5458 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ————— / «4""OJ;' 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— / *} \jy & 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— T £• O M O 75—34—3—-—— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— / A * t J * . 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 1 *^ *7 ^ ** ' 79-34-5 ————— XwO OO J XWO 37 w / 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride AwtSwwlitS —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— 2 -Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Tr ichlor oethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Br omof orm —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone • —— 2 -Hexanone <LC VXTClWllXUf wB WllCfilC* • —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ • —— Toluene • —— Chlorobenzene • —— Ethylbenzene • —— Styrene • —— Xylene (total) 11 11 11 11 2 19 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4 11 11 11 11 160 11 10 11 11 11 2 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U UJ U U U Jfc nu i nix. i°»k l\Uk H3- MU. V ;ieO nu tuS~ \*>^ ttlL FORM I VOA TUT OOS 0104 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS35 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5458 Lab File ID: AE5458 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL; CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO8 O105 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /*-**\Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm; Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ FBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5462 Lab File ID: AE5462 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9 ———————Br omomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochlor omethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2 ———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform___________ ~ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2 -Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuu BJ uuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u I FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT COS OIO6 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) vTATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ FBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5462 Lab File ID: AE5462 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL, CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 008 0107 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5460 Lab File ID: AE546Q Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT O08 O1O8 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE NC TBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5460 Lab File ID: AE5460 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ___i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— *7 Q Q "7 R 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— .Ldb'* *tO A 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— —— Chloromethane —— Bromome thane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1,2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methy 1-2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— l ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ • —— Toluene • —— Chlorobenzene • —— Ethylbenzene • —— Styrene • —— Xylene (total) 10 10 10 101 4 10 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ uuuuuJuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu |0 U.1 10<-C lou. lou. QJL 1 IT /OU3 iou 1 \ \. FORM I VOA 3/90 OO8 01O9 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/3018AW3018.TXT/I»-31-95(10:n«m)/Dl/NE 1U' OOS O11O INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY REPORT FOR L' HENRI 409830.00200000 APRIL 11, 1995 Environmental Technology Development Center P.O. Box 4339 • 1570 Bear Creek Road • Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 • 615-482-6497 • FAX: 615-482-1890 IT Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary ol International Technology Corporation EEJ GEOTECHNICAL CORPORATION LABORATORY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Belinda Price April 11, 1995 IT-Knoxville 312 Directors Drive Knoxville, TN 37923 ETDC Project Number: 409830.00200000 Job Number: 409830.00200000 This is the Certificate of Analysis for the following samples: Client Project ID: L' Henri Date Received by Lab: March 10 and March 14, 1995 Number of Samples: Two (2) received, one (1) tested Sample Type: Soil I. Introduction/Case Narrative ' ' One soil sample was received by IT/ETDC on March 10, 1995. Requested testing included particle-size analysis, moisture content, permeability, density, porosity and organic content. Additional material was received by IT/ETDC on March 14, 1995 to be used if there was not enough sample quantity to complete testing. Please see Appendix A, Sample Number Cross Reference List; Appendix B, Analysis Results; Appendix C, Chain of Custody and Request for Analysis Records, and Appendix D, Variance Documents for specific sample information. Reviewed and Approved: U_o 1 / .4- ^~—Be^erly L. L'eamor/ Project Manager, Geotechnical Services FT Environmental Technology Development Center P.O. Box 4339 • 1570 Bear Creek Road • Oak Ridge, TN 37830 • 615-482-6497 • FAX: 615-482-1890 TUT 008 Oil. 2 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: ETDC Project No.: L HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 II. Analytical Results/Methodology REFERENCES: American Society for Tesing and Materials (ASTM) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 4.08, Soil and Rock (I); Volume 4.09, Soil and Rock (II). Particle-Size Analysis Moisture Content Permeability Porosity Density Organic Content ASTM D 422 ASTM D 2216 ASTM D 5084 EM-1110-2-1906, App. II EM-1110-2-1906, App. II ASTM D 2974 III. Quality Control Quality control checks such as duplicates and spikes (QC samples), are not normally applicable to geotechnical testing. This is due to the inability of obtaining samples with known characteristics, the heterogenous nature of the samples, and Quality Control procedures built-in to the analytical method. QC measures to ensure accuracy and precision of test results include the following: 100% verification on all numerical results - all raw data entries, transcriptions and calculations entered by lab technicians are checked, recalculated and verified. Most data calculations are performed by computer programs. Data validation through test reasonableness - summaries of all test results for individual reports are reviewed to determine the overall reasonableness of data and to determine the presence of any data that may be considered outliers. Quality control procedures are built into most standardized geotechnical procedures. For example, many analyses routinely call for a re-analysis, specifying an acceptance criteria. • Routine instrument calibration - all instruments, gauges and equipment used in testing are calibrated on a routine basis. All instrument calibration follows ASTM or manufacturer guidelines. TUT COS Oil3 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxvilte April 11,1995 Client Project ID: L' HENRI IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 ETDC Project No.: 409830.00200000 Maintenance of all past calibration records - records and certification documents of all instruments, gauges and equipment are updated routinely and maintained in the Quality Control Coordinators Quality/Operations files. Use of trained personnel for conducting tests - all technicians are trained in the application of standard laboratory procedures for geotechnical analyses as well as the quality assurance measures implemented by IT. IV. Data Qualification Particle-Size Distribution - Initial hydrometer results do not always coincide with the curve established by fine sieve analysis results and are occasionally omitted. Overlapping results may be caused by organic debris, soluble salts, or other contaminants contained in the sample, or turbidity of the soil/water suspension immediately after manual agitation. Incomplete dispersion of the hydrometer soil portion may, likewise, cause initial hydrometer results to appear far below the curve established by the fine sieve results. Not all soils will be dispersed effectively by the methods defined in ASTM D 422. Moisture Content - Moisture contents are calculated in accordance with ASTM D 2216. Given results are based on the sample dry weight, not on the sample wet weight as is common in analytical chemistry. Permeability - Reported results of degree of saturation are based on assumed specific gravity and measured specimen dimensions (EM-1110-2-1906, app. II). For the purposes of initiating permeability testing, saturation is verified by > 0.95 B-coefficient as described in ASTM D 5084. Please also refer to ASTM D 4767, Note 16 for further explanation of the B-parameter and degree of saturation. Please refer to Appendix D, the Variance Report, for specific information regarding the variance record. O08 O114 682A-6-93 ATTACHMENT 1 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTA>5-10-95C7:30pmyD2/El TUT OO6 0.1 t r-~i Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April'11, 1995 Client Project ID: FTDC Project No. L1 HENRI 409830.002000(ML IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 SAMPLE NUMBER CROSS-REFERENCE LIST ETDC SAMPLE NO. CLIENT SAMPLE NO. ETDC-6530 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LH01 ETDC-6537 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L H 0 2 —^ n..r 682A-6-93 ATTACHMENT II GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS T/rr KN/WPA890AVP1890.TXTA)5-10-95(7:30pmyD2/El ' '••••'OP? O J •; -7 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: L' HENRI FTOC Proipet No • 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 PARTICLE SIZE ANAL YSIS ASTMD422 Project Name: L' Henri Project Number: 409830.00200000 Specific Gravity = 2.7765 Measured SIEVE ANALYSIS Client Number: ETDC Number: LH01 ETDC-6530 Moisture Content = 11.8% c 0 A R S E Sieve No. 3" 1.5" 0.75" 0.375" #4 #10 Diameter mm 75.000 37.500 1 9.000 9.500 4.750 2.000 Percent Finer 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 96.9% F I N E Sieve No. #20 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 Diameter mm 0.850 0.425 0.250 0.149 0.106 0.075 Percent Finer 87.3% 63.0% 46.5% 36.5% 32.3% 28.9% /-""V •DRY SAMPLE BASIS HYDROMETER ANAL YSIS H Y D R 0 M E T E ' R Diameter mm 0.04540 0.03248 0.02058 0.01200 0.00850 0.00607 0.00430 0.00301 0.00130 Percent Finer 22.5% 20.5% 19.8% 17.8% 17.2% 15.2% 1 2.6% i t ,*J /a :: 9.3% 1 TUT 682A-6-93 008 01.18 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: FTDC Project No L' HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 L' Henri U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES HYDROMETER 12" 6" 3" 1.5" 3M" 3/8" *4 »10 *20 »4O »8O»1OO*14O»200 <SOO SIEVE 90 OU 70 -- 2 ^^ Cf\ m a: 2 2 .,A Uj 40 - - K i Ula. 20 — - 10 — - 0 — 1000 CLIENT SAMPLE i ( 1 ! | ; MO.: B O U E R S 100 c L E S I i ' < E [ f i 10 LH01 GRAVEL o A R S E f \ N E rf- ' • i 1 ! : • -*« 1 K N-t-1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 t » • ! L 1 fr 4-I > , 1 . • S, ! \ : ^ ii 1 0.1 PARTICLE SIZE, mn SAND c o A R S E M E 0 u M K 1 N E ! S\~^"4 1 ] *•^ i i 0.01 0.001 1 ETDC SAMPLE 1 SILT 2 -75 microns ClAY <2./ii«pns i 0.0< MO.: ETDC-6 D01 530 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: PTDC Project No L1 HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM D 2216 PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC SAMPLE NO. CLIENT SAMPLE NO. % MOISTURE % SOLIDS ETDC-6530 LH01 11.8 89.4 TUT' 008 O.12O 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: ETDC Project No L1 HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: CONSTANT HEAD ASTM D ME: L' Henri PERMEABILITY 5084 CLIENT NO.: LH01 .: 409830.00200000 r TER, CM.: 4 , CM.: 5 INITIAL j .8585 .8788 SO. CM.: 18.5394 FENT, %: 11.8 EIGHT, PCF: 129.56 IGHT, PCF: 115.86 URATION,%: 66.2 ETDC NO.: ETDC-6530 I FINAL | 4.8963 5.7865 18.8287 18.8 129.61 109.12 88.6 SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 2.7765 SPEC. GRAVITY (A OR M)*: M MAX. CONSOLIDATION STRESS, PSI: 7.0 % VOLUMETRIC STRAIN, +/-: 0.03 WET WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, g.: 226.19 PRESSURE GRADIENT, PSI: 5.0 MIN. CONSOLIDATION STRESS, PSI: 2.0 TOTAL BACK PRESSURE, PSI: 15.0 PERMEANT FLUID: DEIONIZED, DEAIRED WATER •ASSUMED OR MEASURED COEF. OF PERMEABILITY, CM/S: 1.7E-07 enIo LU X ec LU O. 20.00 18.00 16.00 PERMEABILITY VS TIME 0.00 TIME, SECONDS TUT OOS 0121 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: ETDC Project No L' HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 BULK DENSITY/ DRY DENSITY EM-1110-2-1906, APPENDIX II PROJECT NAME: L1 Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC CLIENT AVERAGE AVERAGE WET MOISTURE BULK DRY SAMPLE SAMPLE LENGTH, DIAMETER. WEIGHT, CONTENT, DENSITY, DENSITY, NUMBER: NUMBER: INCHES: INCHES: GRAMS: %: PCF: PCF: ETDC-6530 LHO1 1.9128 2.3145 226.19 11.83 107.09 95.76 TUT OOS O.I 22 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: ETDC Project No. L1 HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615) 482-6497 POROSITY/PORE VOLUME/ VOID RATIO/DEGREE OF SATURATION EM-1110-2-1906, APPENDIX II PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 SAMPLE NUMBER: ETDC-6530 CLIENT SAMPLE LH01 SPECIFIC 2.7765 POROSITY. VOLUME. DEGREE OF SATURATION. M 44.76 59.03 0.81 40.53 "Assumed or measured (for specific gravity) 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxvilte April 11,1995 Client Project ID: Prnii»rt No L' HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 ORGANIC & ASH CONTENT ASTM D 2974 PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC CLIENT % % % ASH % ORGANIC SAMPLE SAMPLE MOISTURE SOLID (FIXED) [VOLATILE) NUMBER NUMBER CONTENT* CONTENT RESIDUE RESIDUE ETDC-6530 ETDC-6530 DUP. LH01 LH01 8.5 8.5 91.5 91.5 98.5 98.7 1.5 1.3 •MOISTURE CONTENT RESULTS ARE CALCULATED BASED ON A WET WEIGHT BASIS. GIVEN ' ~:. '- ' '"' "•'• T-: %~' E CALCULATED THE SAME AS CHEMICAL MOISTURE CONTENT. ABOVE RESULTS ARE NOT CALCULATED THE SAME AS GEOTECHNICAL MOISTURE (ASTM D 2216). GEOTECHNICAL MOISTURE CONTENT IS CALCULATED BASED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS. TUT OOS O124 _ ATTACHMENT III GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/B5-10-95(8:14pmyD2/El Tl IT OOP O 'I !?ri White: To accompany samples Yellow: Field copy 'See back of form for speci; Enrinnmtntsl Servicti 5815 Middk-brook Pike Knonvilk*. Tennessee 37921 (6I5)58B-Mni Project Name/No. .! __LrferyrL & Sample Team Members jL Profit Center No..3,_ Project Manager4J?<?fe4*«cLft4-1 -*-B>_ / Purchase Order No.6 A///L. Required Report Date ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD* Samples Shipment Date 7 Lab Destination Lab Contact L-tljA Project Contact/Phone Reference Document No. 2230 Page 1 of I Bill to:5 Cacrier/Waybill No. __ Report to:10- y CO Sample 14 A Number ____ TrSB ^/~<3b.^ I / / / ,/____-— ^ Sample 15 Description/Type .=)«, I .^f / / •^ Date/Time16 Collected 3/^rW5S / / <,!., II ...1 I. - ———— „., ___ Container Type 4.1^ / / / — — — ~_ Special Instructions: 23 $ ^ ^ ^OT del-"-^^ Possible Hazard Identification: 24 Non-hazard J Flammable J Skin Irritant J Poison B Turnaround-Time Required: 26 Normal \d Rush J / 1 . Relinquished by 28 /i 1) —— ^=>,, /?ate: ^ (Sgnature/Affiliation) ^ ji/^S /;,<£( $&4&J Time: / 2. Relinquished by/J / 5ate: (Signature/ Affiliation) (/ ' lime: 3. Relinquished by °ate; (Signature/ Affiliation) I "Tie. j Commpnts:29 i Sample18 Volume 3V." — -~>^ / — --^ Pre-19 servative AJov..... ff — — — — / / Requested Testing 20 Program (yeo^e-t-V. Se^ ftviouS RPA/coc-, —————— - —————— ../ / / / Condition on 21 Disposal 22 Record No. ETDC#6537 fTIWff'S v » Pa f?°^ ^'' *' a !,<ICICI •: "' - - • » * w - - ! ? 7 . ' ': > - . - • - '{: "' |: ;>; ;f^ ;'<H ; , c uj'Jk. j>>~}(j. 3k^ps*.Q»?r~ ^\ Sample Disposal: 25 J Unknown Jt_T^^ | Return to Client J Disposal by Lab ' j e t : - Archive (mos.J QC Level: 27 J. J II. J III. J : Project Specific (specify);, 'Mh*~- L \1" 1 . Received by 28 , • . • Date; '3~i4~'?S~ (Signature/AffiHation) (^^.^l >i . Kfc Qf^k! Time: f.^jT^. 2. Received by / ,/ ^X Date: Z-M-ff (Signature/Affiliation) ^4^/^ ^/^-^^^^^ Time: /2. ?^ 3. Received by y Date: (Signature/ Affiliation) "^ , f - . Time' - V, • ' V ATTACHMENT IV GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/OMO-95(8:14pm)/D2/El .- - NONCONFORMANGE/VARIANCE REPORT NONCONFORMANCE — -• •- 'or- - •-•-• '• • •-• Project Name > if Project No. Nonconformance/Variance Description r-$or oesicoooo Date Page | of Report No. (include requirement violated / nr x- on^ ft~l-"75"2L. Z, or Identified by *Z%d4+-*—^ Root Cause Corrective Action (include expected completion date) |To be completed by Expected Completion Date Action taken to preclude recurrence To be performed by Expected Completion Date Client notified (include client name, how notified, and response) Notified by \ Corrective action completed by Corrective action approved by Laboratory Supervisor llProject Manager 3i_cx_—ts+~-J Date Dale Comments llQAO Approval Date J' Use back of page for additional space. Attachofi^ditional pages if necessary. Memorandum To: Ralph Cole Dote: March 16, 1995 From: Beverly L. Leamon Subject: L' Henry: IT-Knoxville I spoke to Becky Charles, Quanterra-Middlebrook, concerning sample numbers for L' Henri Project. She stated that client number LH01 (shelby tube) is #ITSB01-06.5 and client number LH02 (jar sample)is #ITSB01-08.0. I informed Belinda Price, IT Knoxville, about client number confusion and what Becky Charles informed me. Belinda Price stated that both samples were taken from the same location and should be considered as the same sample {each test should be performed once.). The jar sample (LH02) is considered extra material for grain size, moisture content and organic content to be used if we need additional material. She also stated to perform a grain size sieve with hydrometer. Chain- of-Custody states "sieve". 44-8-85 TUT COS O130 White: lo accompany samples Yellow: Field copy 'See back of form for special instructions. TUT COS O.13.1 Enn'ronm</iu/ 5815 Middlcbrnok Pike •;•• Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 . (615)588-6401 ;_: Project Name/No.:^L Sample Team Members 2 N / / V ' _ Profit Center ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD* Samples Shipment Date Z. Lab Destination 1 Lab Contact Reference Document No. 2230 Page 1 of I Bill to:5_ _— 0 cr Project Mana Purchase Order Required Report D Sample 14 \ Number v-v- ——————————— ^TrS5 0\-do£ / / / / J-- ger4;Sec4^i ctiK | -*-£> Project Contact/Phone No 6 jsj/*- Carrier/Waybill No. rttP. ^-M~&)rv*<J( ^^m / j^^H Sample15 Description/Type i -.•/" / / • " : - • • • - ' . . ?, • • —————— ' . Date/Time16 Collected J> 0(fHcj~ /"fc / ./ / ^bi<r^n-ioV>l : ^ 10 13 tU-MT> ~^>e^^r P • j ^. ONE CONTAINER PER LINE ^^^^^^^BBI^^^^I Container Type / / / ~~? —— ~~ Sample18 Volume sW 7" ; Pro-*19 servative /Jpv,fi.. •• •-• — '•'./'• z. - ; • : • • . ' Requested Testing 20 ' Program 6-tfofecL X '••' • / * • X ' ' '^ ^ ° :- •* "; !•-; •': ••.'• - •-'. X :- '•': Condition on 21 Disposal 22 Record No. ETDC^6537 fS &a*f! R • %*? R It SIB iJaE Gi ^•iU^Jtt^gi^ j,,i ' : ni lip1*™ 4, «, i. . ^, . -, k. j\y n. M If; » «*" • ^<fl! ^t^3f fi A *'-v ^i"f y- u k« « Special Instructions:^,23 5/v~f)&- N°r JeJWrta >uJ;>Hc. 3kiy ^A.Wa^T7" -- -\- >-^ : •. ; . Possible Hazard Identification: 24 ? ^J^l.vSample .Disposal: 25 '• / •; Non-hazard J Flamrfiable J: Skin Irritant J Poison B _| Unknown '\£t\ | Return to Client 'j~' Disposal by Lab ^|^"^ Archive . (mos.) Turnarounfi-Time Required: 2. 6 .^ ^QC Level: 27^ .^ •' ', :.;r ••.; ^ . • Normal kr Rush J ,^ ^^ / ' J-:il H.-_J ;: III- J ^ Project Specifici[specify]g . . 1 . Relinquished by 28 < /i ^ :s *=T^; Date:.'^//^/?^7" h (Signature/Affiliation) *^jAlT^lijjpflW SJ*^i2l^lQ&y£^ l^L " ; 2. Relinquished by/j S ;"y . : •;. ; Date:-, . .; ^ ISignature/Atfiliation) (/ .^ T/v j, '. , Time::. ;'' ? 3. Relinquished by"! S V? ? '• D.ate:^. . .:. . i. . |Signature/Af'i;ition] ;;. ;| .' ^ ;', Time: ~ •'• 1 . Received by" 2t fffv • ' • ; , ,; • Date: ^-/-V-^S" (Signatura/AHiliatton) , AUJU^^>-^ <S^^/J Time: /OlOO 3 .^Received by .' / fj> /^jx Date: ^>-/<T'J ^ ($jgpature/Affiiiation) : : x^p-^^<^::^P^ix^v___ Time: /^ S'/T' 3.;:Received$y '/ "£% '.< .- ;;.;,. -Date: (Signature/Affiliation) ^ ' ij '' ', ,". • , -, , Timp- •'*- •' -,' ,^' ..." -'•'•• ''• III IIC,' .—, 1 <jQ '-- - '•' ' •'' ' ' ' ' i •::•"* t - . ' ; • —— "• ——— Lomm(., - a o :.- -^ ' " r ' " . ' ' .. • ; ''' "", ' -' % - :0' ' / '• '•' . ; Appendix B APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXCAVATION PROCESS AND SOIL VENTING PILE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/08-31-95(10:17«m)/DiyNE TUT OOS Appendix B Soil Removal Action Photograph Number Description A. Soil Excavation Activities 1 2 3 4 Soil excavation activities using a backhoe Progressive excavation of soils Progressive excavation of soils Compacting dean backfill soils in the excavation area B. Soil Venting Pile Construction 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Washed coarse gravel (one-half to 1 inch) was used in the soil construction Washed coarse gravel (one-half to 1 inch) was used in the soil construction pile pile Excavated soils were inte (layered with washed coarse gravel Excavated soils were intertayered with washed coarse gravel Corrugated black plastic vent pipes were placed horizontally in gravel/soil layers the A reinforced concrete block wall was built on the four sides of the soil pile A corrugated tin roof was built over the soil pile with roof turbines at the top of the vent pipes for passive soil venting KN/3018/WP3018.TXT/Dg-31-95(10:17«mVDl/NE Appendix C APPENDIX C TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS AND REPLIES KN/3018/WP301S.TXT/08-31-95(10:n«m)/Dl/NE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS SOIL REMEDIATION REPORT FOR O'HENRY LAUNDRY, TUTU, ST. THOMAS Reference: Letter to Nancy D'Anna, Esq., from Carole Peterson received July 27, 1995. General Comments: Comment 1: Response: L:\ss\AugiBP007\bf The limits of the excavation were determined from field gas chromatograph results and using a provisional soil cleanup level of 200 ug/kg, based on preliminary vadose zone leaching modeling. The final EPA cleanup goals for the O'Henry property, based on revisions to the model, are 375 ug/kg PCE in the 0-1.6 feet depth interval, and 31 ug/kg PCE at depths greater than 1.6 ft, which will result in levels of PCE in groundwater below the MCL of 5 ug/1. These cleanup goals are developed from unsaturated zone calculations that take into account infiltration of precipitation, PCE adsorption-desorption from site soils, anaerobic biodegradation of PCE and mixing of contaminated leachate with groundwater in the underlying aquifer. Based on the final EPA calculations, additional soils remediation is needed to address potential sources of groundwater contamination. Cleanup standards calculated by the EPA assume soil contamination occurs at the soil cleanup standard concentration for the entire soil column. Site modeling performed by the EPA and reported in specific comment No. 15 does not take into account all site specific data available. Further, IT cannot verify the results of EPA modeling presented for the O'Henry site because site specific input parameters, input/output files, and spreadsheet calculations have not been presented. However, using the leachate to groundwater dilution factor of 0.04 assumed for the O'Henry site by the EPA (CDM, 1995), and back- calculating from the groundwater MCL for PCE of 5 ppb, the equivalent concentration of PCE in leachate entering groundwater would be 125 ppb. This value is higher than the soil cleanup standard of 31 ppb presented by the EPA which would suggest that the soil cleanup standard must be greater than 125 ppb. Based upon analytical results of the confirmatory soil samples collected during soil remediation activities and physical conditions at the site, soils left in place at the O'Henry Laundry site represent two distinct PCE soil concentration profiles. Profile 1: Soils left in place at the excavation base overlain by clean backfill material brought from offsite. Analytical results indicated that soils used as backfill material from ground surface to a depth of 8.25 feet within the excavation area were clean soils with PCE concentrations below detection limits. Soils underlying the backfill 1 TUT material at the excavation base, at a depth of 8.25 ft and deeper, were found to contain PCE at a maximum concentration of 170 ppb. The soil boring ITSB-01 defines the limits of the contamination at 10 feet below grade (i.e., nondetect at 10 feet). Profile 2: Soils beneath the concrete area on the northern excavation wall. Soils collected from the northern excavation wall, beneath the paved concrete slab were found to contain PCE with maximum concentrations of 38 ppb, 560 ppb, and 1100 ppb at depth intervals of 2 to 3 ft, 3.75 to 4 ft, and 5.33 to 5.88 ft, respectively. No depth limit has been defined for t^e contamination under the paved concrete area; however, the depth of the base of contamination was assumed to be the same as for Profile 1 (see response to Specific Comment No. 14). Table 1 shows the two vertical distribution profiles of PCE soil concentrations. Using the above PCE concentration soil profiles and site specific soil parameters obtained during the soil remediation activities (IT, 1995), groundwater impact due to the mobilization and migration of PCE in the vadose zone was estimated using the computer program VLEACH Version 2.0 (Ravi, et al., 1993). VLEACH is a one- dimensional vadose zone model that predicts contaminant behavior within the vadose zone using a finite difference method. The modelling assumptions were the same as those described in the Workplan (IT, 1994) with the exceptions as described below. These values were obtained during the March 1995 soil remediation activities (IT, 1995) : The soil type at O'Henry is predominantly sandy silt with clay soil. • Dry bulk density = 1.53 g/mL • Volumetric water content = 0.3 Other revised input parameters included: Hydraulic gradient =0.073 ft/ft (EPA Final Report, Estimation of Soil Cleanup Concentrations Required to Protect Groundwater as a Source of Drinking Water, Tutu Wells Site,USVI, 1995) • Organic Carbon Partition Coefficient (1^=364 ml/g (EPA,1995) Soil organic carbon fraction (foc)= 0.006 (EPA, 1995). (The more conservative of the two site specific values determined by IT and the EPA, see also the response to Specific Comment 10.) L:\ss\AugSBP007\bf Model data files (LHENRI for Profile 1 and LHENRI2 for Profile 2) are attached. The VLEACH model provides information on the amount of PCE released to the groundwater in terms of grams per year at every time step. PCE concentrations in groundwater due to the impact of leachate were estimated using VLEACH/mass loading estimates and a one-cell mixing model for the aquifer directly below the contaminated vadose zone. The mixing model assumes complete mixing in the water column. PCE concentrations in groundwater [M] ^ was calculated using: \M\ PCE Glf Volume of water flowing through unit width per year Where water volume = n x t x L x W n = porosity = 0.4 t = aquifer thickness = 10 ft L = flow velocity using a hydraulic conductivity of 1.5 ft/day and hydraulic gradient of 0.073 W = A unit cross-sectional width Water volume = 0.4 x 10 ft x 42.37 ft/year x 1 ft 169.5 ft3/year = 4796 liters/year. The incremental increase in PCE concentrations in groundwater for the O 'Henry site using the two PCE concentration soil profiles are shown in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. Table 2 summarizes the highest groundwater PCE concentrations and the time at which the peak impact occurs beneath the site. Figures 1 and 2 show that with the current PCE soil concentration profiles, groundwater beneath the O 'Henry site will not be impacted above EPA action limits. The site specific modeling will be incorporated into a new chapter titled, "Evaluation of Impact to Groundwater of Soils Left in Place." Comment 2: Concentrations of PCE reported in confirmatory laboratory analyses of samples were in many cases significantly higher than the field GC results, especially from the deeper samples and excavation wall samples. Usually, laboratory analyses of VOCs yield lower concentrations than do field results, due to compound volatilization during shipping and handling. The higher laboratory PCE results for many samples call into question the reliability of the field GC results to accurately determine whether residual PCE concentrations are below the provisional (or any) cleanup level. LVssVAugVBPOOTibf Response: A comparison of the PCE results from samples collected and analyzed by the field GC and in the laboratory by IT and split samples analyzed by the EPA are included on Table 4. An examination of this table indicates that the field GC analyses yielded the highest concentrations in 10 samples, the IT laboratory analysis yielded the highest concentrations in 8 samples and the EPA laboratory yielded the highest concentrations in 2 samples. The field GC result was only lower than the IT laboratory result for four samples where an EPA laboratory split sample result was not available (EXS05, EXS26, EXS27, and EXS35). Of these samples, there was only one sample (EXS27) where the IT laboratory results was more than double the field GC result (195 M-g/kg from field GC and 850 ng/kg from IT laboratory). For this sample, a duplicate analysis was performed. The result (570 ng/kg ) is intermediate of the field GC and IT laboratory results. For the samples for which EPA split samples are available and where the IT (or EPA) laboratory results are higher than the field GC, four samples have laboratory results which are more than double the field GC results (EXS30, EXS31, EXS33, and EXS34). In three of these samples, the IT laboratory has the highest concentration and in one case the EPA has the highest concentration. There are only three samples where the field GC analysis was below the preliminary cleanup standard and where the confirmation sampling analysis was above the preliminary cleanup standard (EXS27, EXS30, and EXS31). These three samples are located beneath the concrete slab on the northern wall of the excavation. In addition, the following should be noted. • Quality control measures were taken during field analysis to support the validity of the test method. Appropriate instrument calibrations were performed and check standards were continuously analyzed throughout the field analysis to verify correct instrument performance. Accuracy and precision data (i.e., MS/MSD samples and surrogate spikes) indicate no problem with data generated by the field GC. • Interpretation of soil VOC data is often fraught with difficulties due to inherent problems with the sampling and analytical process. Losses of VOCs have been reported due to volatilization caused by sample disruption during field or laboratory subsampling, as well as leakage and/or transformation during preanalytical handling. VOCs may become physically entrapped in the microstructure of soils and can be difficult to desorb and remove during extraction. In addition, ancillary soil properties (e.g., water content, organic carbon content, temperature) can affect spatial variability and soil VOC behavior. •'"I1 -A. Comment 3: Response: Specific Comments Comment 1: Response: Comment 2: Response: Comment 3: VOC concentrations vary in soils both in space and time. Therefore, variability in measurement of VOCs can be large as a result of natural variability. Focus should be on the comprehensive data sets rather than on discrete values and on the laboratory confirmation samples rather than the field GC. The confirmation samples indicate that soils have been removed to below the preliminary cleanup standard with the exception of an area of soil beneath the concrete slab. A new subsection will be added to Chapter 3.0 titled, "Evaluation of Field Screening and Laboratory Analytical Results," which will compare the results as described above. High concentrations of PCE in the southeastern part of the excavation pit and the southern pit wall near the Liquor Barn (e.g., EXS12, EXS27, EXS30, and EXS31) indicate that not all soils containing PCE above 200 ug/kg were removed. It therefore appears that additional PCE-contaminated soils exist beneath the O'Henry building. We agree that field GC and confirmation samples indicate that soil with concentrations above the provisional cleanup level of 200 fxg/kg are left in place beneath the concrete paving at the northern end of the excavation. This will be incorporated in the first paragraph of the conclusions section. Section 1.1.2. page 1-2 and 1-3. The provisional level of 200 ug/kg has been revised to 31 ug/kg for soils more than 1.6 feet below ground surface, based on EPA's final vadose zone modeling results. This information should be incorporated into the text. The information as requested will be added to the text in Section 1.0; however, please see response to General Comment No. 1. Section 2.1, page 2-1. The maximum concentration of PCE previously reported in subsurface soils was 180,000 ug/kg in sample e-02-02 from a depth of 1.5-2.5 ft (Figure 5-11 of the Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report), not the 59,000 ug/kg in boring SS1 as reported here. We agree; however, it should be noted that the soil boring SS1 was targeted to the same location as e02-02. Therefore, data from SS1 is more recent than e02-02. The text will be revised accordingly. Section 2.1, page 2-1. The sample depths of the two undisturbed soil samples that were submitted for geotechnical analyses should be listed. According to Appendix A, apparently only one of these Response: Comment 4: Response: Comment 5: Response: Comment 6: Response: Comment 7: samples underwent analysis. The text here and on page 3-3 should clarify the depth interval sampled and that only sample LH01 and its duplicate were analyzed. We agree; two samples (i.e., one sample LH01 and its duplicate LH02) were collected; however, only one sample, LH01 from a depth interval of 5 to 6.5 feet, was analyzed for geotechnical parameters. The text will be revised accordingly. Section 2.2, page 2-1. Here and elsewhere, the text should indicate that the cleanup level of 200 ug/kg was an assumed cleanup level and was used provisionally. We agree. The text will be revised accordingly. Section 2.6, page 2-6. The text indicates that a PID was not available during installation of boring ITSB-01. Presumably the PID had arrived by the time of the soil excavation work, yet no organic vapor readings are presented in any section of the report. If PID readings are available they should be discussed in the text because they would aid in identifying contaminated soil zones within and adjacent to the excavated area. Table 3 summarizes PID readings taken during soil remediation activities. PID readings will be included in the report. Section 3.1, page 3-1, second paragraph. PCE concentrations of up to 2,845 ug/kg were found at a depth of 3-4 ft at location EXS12. Table 3-1 indicates this is an estimated concentration since the value exceeded the instrument calibration range. The text should be revised to discuss how large this estimated result could potentially be. The reported value from sample EXS12 is reported as an estimated concentration. A sample aliquot of 0.5 g was used for analysis; the analytical results exceeded the calibration linear range. Due to problems obtaining additional supplies, the sample was not reextracted and reanalyzed with a smaller aliquot. A smaller sample aliquot would have allowed the analytical result to be within linear range; thus a more accurate value would be reported. The reported result is most likely slightly higher than the actual concentration. This will be added to the text. Section 3.1, page 3-1, third paragraph. Soil samples collected from the excavation wall adjacent to the concrete slab exceeded the provisional PCE cleanup level of 200 ug/kg. Given that the EPA has established an even lower soil PCE cleanup goal to be protective of groundwater, the report should discuss the potential for the L.-\ss\Au£\BPOO'Abf OOP? Response: Comment 8: Response: Comment 9: Response: Comment 10: Response: residual contaminants at these sample sites (and others exceeding the cleanup goals) to serve as ongoing sources of groundwater contamination. See response to General Comment No. 1. Table 3.2. Please include a brief discussion of the data qualifiers used in this table, particularly the "D" qualifier, in the associated text on page 3-2. Explanation of data qualifiers will be added to the text. Section 3.2, page 3-2. Based on Tables 3-1 and 3-2 and the associated figures, almost half of the samples that underwent both CLP and field GC analysis show higher PCE concentrations in the CLP results than the GC results. See General Comment 2. The text on page 3-2 should discuss why this is the case, and how this finding may affect interpretation of all of the field GC results. See response to General Comment No. 2. Section 3.3. page 3-3. The organic carbon content is reported as 0.015 (1.5 %) in a sample collected from a depth of 5 - 6.5 ft. This value is almost three times higher than the value reported from the O'Henry property from two EPA samples collected from the top two feet (average TOC = 0.6 %), and much higher than the organic carbon values of 0.0002 (0.02%) to 0.001 (0.1%) used by IT in the VLEACH modeling. The report should discuss the representativeness of this value relative to other site-reported or assumed TOC values, and its implications for PCE movement through the soils. The ASTM method (D2974-87) used by IT is a combustion/incineration method that will also count inorganic carbon (e.g., carbonate and bicarbonate), unless it is deliberately removed during the sample preparation stage. (The Lloyd Kahn method, "Determination of Total Organic Carbon in Sediment", 1988, which is often used by EPA, includes an acid treatment step during sample preparation to remove inorganic carbon.) Given the presence of carbonate rocks in the area, eroded carbonate material is probably present in many Tutu soils. This could account for the higher values reported in the subsurface by IT versus the surface soil values reported by EPA. Section 3.3, page 3-3 on geotechnical testing incorrectly reports the results of ASTM D-2974 as fraction of organic carbon. The actual parameter measured by ASTM D-2974 is the fractional organic material contained in the sample. As reported in Appendix A of the document, the two analyses performed by ASTM D-2974 produced fractional organic material results of 0.015 and 0.013. The fraction of organic 7 Comment 11: Response: Comment 12: Response: Comment 13: material can be related to the fraction of organic carbon by dividing by 1.724 (Dragun, J. 1988). Following this approach, and using the average fraction of organic material (0.014), yields a fractional organic carbon content of 0.008 or 0.8 percent. The model VLEACH uses "organic carbon fraction" as an input parameter which is why the ASTM method was applied by IT. The percentage of organic carbon calculated by IT is, therefore, comparable with the percentage of total organic carbon as presented by the EPA. The fraction organic carbon value used by IT in calculation of the PCE cleanup standard using VLEACH (IT, 1994) was lower than the values determined from laboratory tests. The effect of using a higher fraction organic content in the previous modeling would have resulted in a higher cleanup standard. This will be added to the text. Section 5.0, page 5-1. first sentence. Based on the residual PCE contamination greater than 200 ug/kg detected in soils in the excavation pit southeastern wall, this sentence should be revised to indicate that not all of the source of potential groundwater contamination at the O'Henry site has been removed. See response to General Comment No. 3. Section 5.0. page 5-1. second bullet. The argument that the average PCE concentration is soils is nearly equal to the provisional cleanup level, when the reported PCE concentrations are as much as five times greater than the provisional level, is not valid. The text must be revised. We agree. See response to General Comment No. 1. Section 5.0. page 5-1, second bullet, final sentence. The report states that, due to the distance to the water table (approximately 16 feet), PCE concentrations much greater than 200 ug/kg would be needed to result in detectable concentrations of PCE in groundwater. Based on EPA's soil leaching modeling, this statement is not true. Attached is a new soil profile constructed for the O'Henry property using the maximum residual contamination remaining at each depth in soils, post-excavation, as reported in the IT soil removal report. The site-wide values for infiltration, Kd and biodegradation were used. The corresponding contaminant breakthrough curve indicates that leaching of these soils will result in concentrations of PCE in groundwater of approximately 30 ug/1 in the future, well above the drinking water standard of 5 ug/1. The EPA model assumes a low organic carbon content in the deeper soil horizon, but allows for anaerobic biodegradation of PCE throughout the soil column. The modeling indicated that almost no 8 TUT OO8 0145 Response: Comment 14: Response: Comment 15: compound attenuation occurs in the deeper zone, due to the low organic carbon content and biodegradation rate loss terms used. Furthermore, PCE volatilization is predicted to be a very minor attenuation process at depths below about 1 meter due to the presence of anaerobic breakdown products found in soils below this depth. Therefore, PCE will migrate in ieachate relatively unattenuated to the water table, regardless of the distance of the source from ground water. The text should remove this statement. Please see response to General Comment No. 1. Section 5.0, page 5-2. The text states that PCE concentrations were below detectable levels beneath 10 ft in boring ITSB-01. The report should indicate, however, that this boring may not be indicative of concentrations in surrounding soils. Based on sampling results shown in Figures 2-4 and 2-7, the higher PCE concentrations exist in nearby soils. Based on an evaluation of the spatial PCE concentrations from field GC and laboratory confirmation sampling shown in Figures 2-3 through 2-7 of the report, the depth profile for PCE concentrations in boring ITSB- 01 appears representative of the depth profile of PCE concentration in soil in the excavation area. PCE which may have entered soil and migrated from the unpaved area back under the concrete will have the following characteristics: • It is unlikely to have migrated more than a few feet horizontally. • It will not volatilize as fast because it is effectively "capped." • It will not migrate vertically downward in the dissolved phase as fast because there is a reduced driving force (i.e., lower infiltration). Given the above characteristics and visual observations which indicate no residual free phase in soil and no vertical pathway for preferred contaminant migration (soils are uniform) the contaminant profile in boring ITSB-01 may not be indicative of concentrations in soils beneath the paved area in terms of actual concentrations; however, it likely accurately reflects the "general profile" where the maximum concentration of PCE in soil is between 5 and 10 feet below grade and there is non-detect below 10 feet. This will be added to the text. Section 5.0. page 5-2, first paragraph, last sentence. The report states that excavation of soils to a depth of 8 ft has removed all PCE-contaminated soil. Given the sampling results provided in the report, this is a false and misleading sentence which must be revised. n TUT OOS O14.6 Response: See response to General Comment No. 3. Comment 16: Section 5.0, page 5-2. The report recommends that no further in situ remediation be performed at the site. However, the revised EPA soil action levels for PCE indicate that the concentrations of PCE remaining in soils in the vicinity of the excavation will be ongoing sources of PCE contamination of groundwater above MCLs. Based on the site findings and EPA's soil action levels, some form of additional soil remedial action is required. The use of soil vapor extraction (SVE) and angled extraction wells, for example, could be effective in amoving residual PCE beneath the adjacent building. Response: See response to General Comment No. 1. References CDM Federal Programs Corporation, 1995, Final Report Estimation of Soil Cleanup Concentrations Required to Protect Groundwater as a Source of Drinking Water, Tutu Wells Site, US. Virgin Islands. Dragun, J., 1988, The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute. IT Corporation, 1994, Work Plan for Evaluation and Interim Remediation of Soils O'Henry Laundry, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. IT Corporation, 1995, Soil Remediation Report, O'Henry Laundry, Tutu, St. Thomas, US. Virgin Islands. fur cos 0147 L:>is\A<ig\BP007\bf 1 0 Table 1 Concentration Profiles Used in the Model O'Henry Laundry, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Concentration Profile No. 1 2 Depth Interval (ft) 0 - 8.25 8.25 - 10 0 - 3 3 -5 5 - 10 PCE Concentration (ppb) 0 170 38 560 1100 TU': 008 11 Table 2 Highest Groundwater PCE Concentrations O'Henry Laundry St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Beneath Excavated Area Beneath Paved Concrete Area Concentration Profile No. (Refer Table 1) 1 2 Highest Groundwater PCE Concentration d*g/L) 0.026 0.44 Time for Peak Impact (Years) 76 90 L:\ss\AugSBP007\bf 12 Table 3 Summary of Organic Vapor Readings O'Henry Laundry St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin islands Sample No. EXS06 EXS07 EXS08 EXS09 EXS10 EXS11 EXS12 EXS13 EXS14 EXS15 EXS16 EXS17 EXS18 EXS19 EXS20 EXS21 EXS22 ESX23 EXS24 EXS25 EXS26 EXS27 EXS28 EXS29 EXS30 EXS31 EXS32 EXS33 EXS34 EXS35 PID Reading (ppm) 2 0.1 22 34 0.2 0.25 0.5 1.8 1.8 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.0 0 0 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.5 1.5 11.0 3.0 3.0 7.5 1.0 4.0 2.0 0.5 13 TUT Table 4 A Comparison of PCE Results Sample Number ITSB-01-05.0 ITSB-01-10.0 ITSB-01-14.5 EXS01 EXS02 EXS03 EXS04 EXS05 EXS23 EXS24 EXS25 EXS26 EXS27 EXS28 EXS29 EXS30 EXS31 EXS32 EXS33 EXS34 EXS35 Field GC 237.69' 12.38 4.33/4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324.09 83.95 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 IT Laboratory 120 2 J 11 U 140 D 120 54 100 D 100 290 D 21 190 300 D 850 D/570 D 210 D 150 D 1100 560 D 38 31 170 160 EPA Laboratory 100 J 2 J 210 J 220 J 480 J 630 J 34 J 30 J 30 J highlighting indicates which analytical method yielded the highest concentration for each sample. L: \ssiAug\B POO'Abf 14 FIGURE 1 0.030 -i 10 0.000 0 Predicted Groundwater lmpact-foc = 0.006 (Area under Excavation) 0) M O 0.010 ^ 100 200 300 Time (years) 400 FIGURE 2 0.500 -, 0.000 Predicted Groundwater lmpact-foc = 0.006 (Area under Paved Concrete) 100 200 300 i i i i i i I 400 Time (y^nrs t"STO SCO Iflj r Q APPENDIX D VLEACH MODEL FILES TUT oos o t c:ici KN73018/WP3018.TXrA»8-31-95(10:17im)/Dl/NE VLEACH version 2.0, 1993. Developed by : Varadhan Ravi and Jeffrey A. Johnson (Dynamac) Center for Subsurface Modeling Support Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.'O. Box 1198 Ada, OK 74820 L'Henri Simulation. Polygon 1 At time = 0 . 0 0 , Mass in gas phase = Mass in liquid phase Mass sorbed total mass in vadose zone = 0.36413E-03g/sq.ft. 0.11835E-02g/sq.ft. 0.13182E-01g/sq.ft. 0.14730E-01g/sq.ft Polygon 1 At time = 5.00, total mass in vadose zone • Mass in gas phase = 0.36154E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.11751E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.13089E-01g/sq.ft. 0.14626E-01g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 0.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10443E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11034E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.65440E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.37887E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10443E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.41109E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.10443E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11034E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.65440E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.37887E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10443E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.41109E-08g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 10.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.35859E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.11655E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12982E-01g/sq.ft. 0.14506E-01g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 5.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.11934E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.56155E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.60424E-04g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.53300E-04g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . H934E-03g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.40163E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.22376E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.67189E-05g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.12586E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.91187E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 22377E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81345E-08g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 15.00, Mass in gas phase Mass in liquid phase Mass sorbed total mass in vadose zone 0.35510E-03g/sq.ft, 0.11542E-02g/sq.ft. 0.12856E-01g/sq.ft. 0.14365E-01g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 10.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.14141E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.13952E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.55518E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.71948E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14142E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.44674E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.36518E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.20671E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.18138E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16313E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.36519E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.12602E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 20.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.35085E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = , 0.11404E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12702E-01g/sq.ft. 0.14193E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 15.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.17180E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.27400E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.50827E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.93579E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -Q.17181E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 30122E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.53698E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.48071E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.23221E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.25671E-03g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.53699E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = CK15658E-07g/sq.ft. ^ Polygon 1 At time = 25.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .13982E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 34564E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .11234E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12513E-Clg/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 20.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.21102E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.47006E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.46408E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 .11761E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21102E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.46566E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.74799E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.95076E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.27862E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.37432E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.74801E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.20314E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 "At time = 30.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .13723E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 33924E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.1102SE-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12282E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 25.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 25864E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.73232E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.42287E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table == -0 .14313E-03g/sq. f t. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.25865E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.61118E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.10066E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.16831E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.32090E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.51745E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10067E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.26426E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 35.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .13410E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 33150E-03g/sq. f t. Vlass in liquid phase = 0 .10775E-02g/sq. f t. Mass sorbed = 0.12001E-01g/sq.ft. TUT Since last printout at time = 30.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.31320E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.10574E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.38474E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16900E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.31321E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.29104E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13198E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.27404E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.35938E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.68645E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13199E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.29337E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 40.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.13038E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.32230E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10476E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.11668E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 35.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.37223E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14332E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.34963E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.19395E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.37224E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.91386E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.16921E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.41737E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.39434E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.88040E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.16921E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.38417E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 45.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .12605E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.31160E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10128E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.11281E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 40.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.43260E-03g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.18410E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.31742E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.21676E-03g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.43260E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84401E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 TUT 008 0159 Change in Total Mass = -0.21247E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.60147E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.42608E-03g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10972E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21247E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.39116E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 50.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .12114E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.29947E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.97336E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.10842E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 45.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.49086E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.22574E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28795E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.23633E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.49086E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.19791E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.26155E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.82720E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.45488E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.13335E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26156E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40978E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 55.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .11571E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.28603E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.92967E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.10355E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 50.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.54374E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.26579E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26105E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.25186E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.54375E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 71013E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.31593E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.10930E-02g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.48098E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.15853E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.31593E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.48196E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 60.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .10982E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.27148E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.88239E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.98284E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 55.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 58847E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.30200E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.23653E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.26282E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.58847E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18044E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 37477E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13950E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.50464E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18482E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.37478E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.50059E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 65.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .10359E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.25608E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.83233E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.92709E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 60.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 62300E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere =. 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.33254E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 21419E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.26905E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.62301E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 30268E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 .43707E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.17275E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.52606E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.21172E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.43708E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 52620E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 70.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 97131E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.24011E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.78041E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.86926E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 65.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 64618E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.35615E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.19388E-04g/sq.ft. TUT 008 O.161 Diffusion in from water table = -0.27065E-03g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 64619E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.45402E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.50169E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.20837E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.54544E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.23879E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.50170E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.56811E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 75.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.90554E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.22385E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.72757E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.81040E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 70.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.65771E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.37219E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.17541E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.26798E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.6577lE-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40745E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.56746E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.24559E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.56298E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.26558E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.56747E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.57276E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 80.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.83974E-02g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.20758E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.67470E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.75151E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 75.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.65803E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.38058E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.15864E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.26159E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.65803E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.34925E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.63327E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.28364E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.57885E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.29174E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.63327E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 60536E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 85.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 77492E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0 .19156E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 . 62262E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.69350E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 80.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.64820E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.38176E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.14341E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 25211E-03g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.64820E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18626E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.69809E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.32182E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.59319E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.31695E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.69809E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.62864E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 90.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .71195E-02g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.17599E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.57203E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.63715E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 85.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.62967E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.37648E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.12960E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.24023E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.62968E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18626E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.76105E-02g/sq. f t. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.35947E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.60615E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.34098E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.76106E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.64727E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 95.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 65154E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0 .16106E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.52349E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.58308E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 90.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 60412E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.36577E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . H708E-04g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.22664E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.60412E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.221l9E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 82147E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.39604E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.61786E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.36364E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.82147E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.67987E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 100.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 59421E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.14689E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.47743E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.53178E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 95.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.57326E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.35074E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.10574E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.21195E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.57326E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81491E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 87879E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.43112E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.62843E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.38484E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.87880E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.67987E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 105.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 54033E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.13357E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.43414E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.48356E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 100.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 53876E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.33249E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.95470E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.19672E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.53876E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16298E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TUT OOS O164 Change in Total Mass = -0.93267E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.46437E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.63798E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.40451E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.93267E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 69849E-07g/sq. ft. Polygon 1 At time = 110.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.49012E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.12116E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.39380E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.43863E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 105.00 Change in Total Mass =- -0 . 50211E-03g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.31209E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.86177E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18140E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.50211E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 98953E-09g/sq. f t. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 98288E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.49558E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.64660E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.42265E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.98288E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.70781E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 115.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.44366E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.10967E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.35647E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.39705E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 110.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 46458E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.29046E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.77772E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16635E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.46459E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.23574E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.10293E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.52462E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.65437E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.43928E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10293E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.72643E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 120.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.40094E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.99113E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.32214E-03g/sq.ft. . Mass sorbed = 0 . 35882E-02g/sq. f t. Since last printout at time = 115.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.42724E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.26838E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.70172E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.15184E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.42724E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.4656SE-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.10721E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.55146E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.66139E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.45447E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10721E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.73574E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 125.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.36185E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.89450E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.29074E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.32384E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 120.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.39087E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.24646E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.63305E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.13808E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.39087E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.10477E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.lllllE-Olg/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.57611E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.66772E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.46827E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11112E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.74506E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 130.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.32625E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.80648E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.26213E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.29197E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 125.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.35608E-03g/sq. f t. Advection in from atmosphere.= 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.22519E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.57101E-05g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.125l8E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.35608E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.78580E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 .11468E-01g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.59863E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.67343E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.48079E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11468E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.75437E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 135.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.29392E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.72657E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.23616E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.26304E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 130.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .32326E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.20490E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.51498E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11320E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .32326E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.90222E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.11791E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.61912E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.67858E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.49211E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11791E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.75437E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 140.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.26466E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.65423E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.21264E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.23685E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 135.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.29265E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.18582E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.46440E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10218E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.29265E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .40745E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12083E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.63770E-02g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.68322E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.50233E-02g/sq.ft, TUT COS 0167 Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12084E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.75437E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 145.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.23822E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.58888E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.19140E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.21319E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 140.00 Change in Total Mass = -0,26436E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.16807E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.41874E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.92105E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .26436E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.75670E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12348E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.65451E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.68741E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.51154E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12348E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.76368E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 \t time = 150.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.21438E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.52994E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.17225E-03g/sq.ft. Mass'sorbed = 0.19185E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 145.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.23842E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.15171E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.37755E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.82934E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.23842E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.68394E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12586E-01g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 66968E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.69119E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.51984E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12586E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.77300E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 155.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.19290E-02g/sq. ft. in gas phase = 0 .47685E-04g/sq. f t. Vlass in liquid phase = 0 .15499E-03g/sq. f t. Mass sorbed = 0.17263E-02g/sq.ft. TUT Since last printout at time = 150.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.21476E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13673E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.34038E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.74624E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21476E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.30559E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12801E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 68335E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.69459E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.52730E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12801E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.77300E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 160.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.17357E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.42907E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.13946E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.15534E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 155.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.19328E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12310E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.30686E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.671l7E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.19328E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.52387E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12994E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.69566E-Q2g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.6976SE-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.53401E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12994E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.79162E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 165.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.15619E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.38610E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.12549E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.13978E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 160.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.17386E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11074E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.27662E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.60349E-04g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.17386E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.48021E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13168E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -o.70673E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.70043E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.54004E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13168E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.79162E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 170.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.14055E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.34745E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.11293E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12579E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 165.00 Change in Total Mass - -0 .15633E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.99581E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.24935E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.54259E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.15633E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.52387E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 .13324E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.71669E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.70292E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.54547E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13325E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.79162E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 175.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.12650E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.31271E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10164E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.11321E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 170.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .14055E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.89521E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.22476E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.48784E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14055E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.61118E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 .13465E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.72564E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.70517E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.55035E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13465E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.79162E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 TUT At time = 180.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . ll386E-02g/sq. ft . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 28147E-04g/sq. ft . Mass in liquid phase = 0 . 91485E-04g/sq. ft . Mass sorbed = 0 .10190E-02g/sq. ft . Since last printout at time = 175.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 12636E-03g/sq. ft . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 80470E-04g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 20259E-05g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 .43865E-04g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 12636E-03g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = -0 . 29104E-09g/sq. f t . Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 13591E-01g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 73369E-02g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 70719E-03g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 55473E-02g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 13591E-01g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 80094E-07g/sq. ft . Polygon 1 At time = 185.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 10250E-02g/sq. f t . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 25338E-04g/sq. f t . Mass in liquid phase = 0 . 82357E-04g/sq. f t . Mass sorbed = 0 . 91732E-03g/sq. f t . Since last printout at time = 180.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 11361E-03g/sq. ft . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 72336E-04g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 18261E-05g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 39448E-04g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 11361E-03g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 61118E-09g/sq. f t . Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 13705E-01g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 74093E-02g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 70902E-03g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 55868E-02g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 13705E-01g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 81025E-07g/sq. ft . Polygon 1 At time = 190.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 92286E-03g/sq. f t . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 22813E-04g/sq. f t . Mass in liquid phase = 0 . 74149E-04g/sq. f t . Mass sorbed = 0 . 82590E-03g/sq. f t . Since last printout at time = 185.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .10216E-03g/sq. ft . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0 . 65032E-04g/sq. f t - Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 16459E-05g/sq. f t 008 Diffusion in from water table = -0.35482E-04g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries •= -0.10216E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16007E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13807E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.74743E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71066E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.56223E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13807E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81025E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 195.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.83098E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.20542E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.66767E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.74367E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 190.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.91879E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.58474E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.14835E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.31921E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.91879E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 20373E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13899E-01g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.75328E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71215E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.56542E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13899E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81956E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 200.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.74833E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.18499E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.60126E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.66971E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 195.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 82648E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.52588E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.13370E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.28722E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.82648E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 29104E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13982E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.75854E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71348E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.56829E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .13982E-01g/sq. ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81956E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 205.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 67398E-03g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.16661E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.54152E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.60316E-C3g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 200.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.74359E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.47305E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.12051E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.25849E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.74359E-04g/sq. ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.15280E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14056E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = O.OOQOO g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.76327E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71469E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.57088E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14056E-01g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.81956E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 210.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 60706E-03g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.15007E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.48775E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.54328E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 205.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.66914E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.42561E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.10861E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.23268E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 66914E-04g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.58208E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14123E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 76752E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71578E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.57320E-02g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .14123E-01g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.81956E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 215.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.54684E-03g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.13518E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.43936E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.48938E-03g/sq.ft. TUT Since last printout at time = 210.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.60226E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.0.0000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.38300E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.97887E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.20947E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.60226E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.22192E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14183E-01g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.77135E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71675E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.57530E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14183E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.81956E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 220.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.49262E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.12178E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.39580E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.44086E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 215.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.54215E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.34472E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.88222E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18861E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 54216E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16735E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14237E-01g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.77480E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71764E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.57718E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .14237E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.82888E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 225.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.44381E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.10971E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.35658E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.39718E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 220.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.48813E-04g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.31033E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.79511E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16985E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.48813E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = -0.72760E-llg/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14286E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.77790E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 7l843E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 57888E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14286E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.82888E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 230.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.39985E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.98844E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.32127E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.35784E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 225.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.43954E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.27941E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71660E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.15297E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .43954E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16735E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14330E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.78070E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71915E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58041E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14330E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.82888E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 235.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.36027E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.89059E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.28946E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.32242E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 230.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.39584E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.25160E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.64584E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.13778E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.39584E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.94587E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14370E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.78321E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.71979E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58179E-02g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .14370E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 240.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .32462E-03g/sq. ft . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 80245E-05g/sq. f t . Mass in liquid phase = 0 .26082E-04g/sq. ft . sorbed = 0 .29051E-03g/sq. ft . Since last printout at time = 235.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 35652E-04g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 22659E-04g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 58206E-06g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 12411E-04g/sq. ft . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 35652E-04g/sq. f t . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 43656E-10g/sq. f t . Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 14405E-01g/sq. ft . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 78548E-02g/sq. ft . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 72038E-03g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 58303E-02g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 14405E-01g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 83819E-07g/sq. ft . Polygon 1 At time = 245.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 29250E-03g/sq. f t . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 72307E-05g/sq. f t . Mass in liquid phase = 0 . 23502E-04g/sq. ft . Mass sorbed = 0 . 26177E-03g/sq. f t . *v '"Since last printout at time = 240.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 32114E-04g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 20409E-04g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 52458E-06g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 11181E-04g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 32114E-04g/sq. ft . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 58208E-10g/sq. ft . Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 14438E-01g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 78752E-02g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 72090E-03g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 58415E-02g/sq. f t . Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 14438E-01g/sq. f t . Mass discrepancy = 0 . 82888E-07g/sq. ft . Polygon 1 At time = 250.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .26357E-03g/sq. f t . Mass in gas phase = 0 . 65155E-05g/sq. ft . Mass in liquid phase = 0 .21177E-04g/sq. ft . Mass sorbed = 0 .23588E-03g/sq. ft . Since last printout at time = 245.00 "v Change in Total Mass = -0 . 28929E-04g/sq. f t . Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 18384E-04g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 .47278E-06g/sq. f t . Diffusion in from water table = -0.10073E-04g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28930E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.10550E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14466E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.78936E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 72137E-03g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58516E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14467E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 255.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.23751E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.58713E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.19083E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.21256E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 250.00 Change in Total Mass = -0. 26063E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.16561E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.42609E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.90756E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26063E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = -0.12733E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14492E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79101E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 72180E-03g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58606E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14493E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 260.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.21403E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.52908E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.17197E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.19154E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 255.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.23481E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14920E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 .38401E-06g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.81772E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.23481E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13097E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14516E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79251E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 72218E-03g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58688E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14516E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 265.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.19287E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 .47678E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.15497E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.17261E-C3g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 260.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.21156E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13442E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.34608E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 73681E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21156E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40018E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14537E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79385E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72253E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58762E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14537E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 270.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.17381E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.42966E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.13965E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.15555E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 265.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.19062E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12111E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.31191E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.66392E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.19062E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.34561E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14556E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79506E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72284E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58828E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14556E-01g/sq. ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84750E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 275.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .15663E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 38720E-05g/sq. f t. Mass in liquid phase = 0.12585E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.14018E-03g/sq.ft. TUT Since last printout at time = 270.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.17177E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 .10913E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 28110E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.59826E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.17177E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.29104E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14573E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 79615E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72312E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 58888E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14573E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 280.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.14116E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.34894E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 . H342E-04g/sq. f t. Mass sorbed = 0.12633E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 275.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.15478E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 98332E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.25334E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 53911E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.15478E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0,43656E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14589E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 79714E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72338E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58942E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14589E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84750E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 285.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.12721E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 31446E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .10221E-04g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.11384E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 280.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.13947E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 88607E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.22832E-06g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.48581E-05g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13947E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.52751E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 008 Change in Total Mass = -0.14603E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.79802E-02g/sq. ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72361E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.58991E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .14603E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84750E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 290.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.11464E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.28340E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.92111E-05g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.l0260E-03g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 285.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.12568E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 79845E-05g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.20577E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.43780E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12568E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.23647E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14615E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79882E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72381E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.59034E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14615E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.85682E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 295.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.10332E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.25540E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.83011E-05g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.92461E-04g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 290.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.11326E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 71952E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.18545E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.39453E-05g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11326E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.30923E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14627E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79954E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72400E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.59074E-02g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14627E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.85682E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 TUT 008 O1SO At time = 300.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.23017E-05g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.74811E-05g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.83327E-04g/sq.ft. 0.93110E-04g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 295.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .10206E-04g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.64840E-05g/sq.ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.16713E-06g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 35554E-05g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10206E-04g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.29104E-10g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14637E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.80019E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.72416E-03g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.59109E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14637E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84750E-07g/sq.ft. GROUNDWATER IMPACT OF POLYGON Time 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70 .00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00 160.00 165.00 Mass per area (g/sq.ft. 0.38990E-04 0.58915E-04 0.85900E-04 0.12098E-03 0.16461E-03 0.21636E-03 0.27473E-03 0.33727E-03 0.40086E-03 0.46207E-03 0.51764E-03 0.56482E-03 0.60159E-03 0.62680E-03 0.64017E-03 0.64217E-03 0.63386E-03 0.61672E-03 0.59241E-03 0.56269E-03 0.52921E-03 0.49349E-03 0.45681E-03 0.42022E-03 0.38454E-03 0.35037E-03 0.31811E-03 0.28800E-03 0.26018E-03 0.23464E-03 0.21136E-03 0.19022E-03 0.17109E-03 Total Mass (g) 0.38990E-04 0.58915E-04 0.85900E-04 0.12098E-03 0.16461E-03 0.21636E-03 0.27473E-03 0.33727E-03 0.40086E-03 0.46207E-03 0.51764E-03 0.56482E-03 0.60159E-03 0 .62680E-03 0.64017E-03 0.64217E-03 0.63386E-03 0.61672E-03 0.59241E-03 0.56269E-03 0.52921E-03 0.49349E-03 0.45681E-03 0.42022E-03 0.38454E-03 0.35037E-03 0.31811E-03 0.28800E-03 0.26018E-03 0.23464E-03 0.21136E-03 0.19022E-03 0.17109E-03 TUT 170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00 225.00 230.00 235.00 240.00 245.00 250.00 255.00 260.00 265.00 270.00 275.00 280.00 285.00 290.00 295.00 300.00 ****************** ****************** TOTAL GROUNDWATER Time (yr) 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 0.15384E-03 0.13830E-03 0.12434E-03 0.11178E-03 0.10051E-03 0.90395E-04 0.81311E-04 0.73154E-04 0.65828E-04 0.59247E-04 0.53333E-04 0 .48017E-04 0.43237E-04 0.38938E-04 0.35070E-04 0.31590E-04 0 .28457E-04 0.25636E-04 0.23097E-04 0.20810E-04 0.18751E-04 0.16895E-04 0.15224E-04 0.13719E-04 0.12362E-04 0.11140E-04 0.10039E-04 r************: :************•: IMPACT Mass (g) 0.38990E-04 0.58915E-04 0.85900E-04 0.12098E-03 0.16461E-03 0.21636E-03 0.27473E-03 0.33727E-03 0.40086E-03 0.46207E-03 0.51764E-03 0.56482E-03 0.60159E-03 0.62680E-03 0.64017E-03 0.64217E-03 0.63386E-03 0.61672E-03 0.59241E-03 0.56269E-03 0.52921E-03 0.49349E-03 0.45681E-03 0.42022E-03 0.38454E-03 0.35037E-03 0.31811E-03 0.15384E-03 0.13830E-03 0.12434E-03 0.11178E-03 0.10051E-03 0.90395E-04 0.81311E-04 0.73154E-04 0.65828E-04 0.59247E-04 0.53333E-04 0.48017E-04 0.43237E-04 0.38938E-04 0.35070E-04 0.31590E-04 0.28457E-04 0.25636E-04 0.23097E-04 0.20810E-04 0.18751E-04 0.16895E-04 0.15224E-04 0.13719E-04 0.12362E-04 0.11140E-04 0.10039E-04 Cumulative Mass 0.38990E-04 0.97906E-04 0.18381E-03 0.30478E-03 0.46940E-03 0.68576E-03 0.96049E-03 0.12978E-02 0.16986E-02 0.21607E-02 0.26783E-02 0.32432E-02 0.38447E-02 0.44715E-02 0.51117E-02 0.57539E-02 0.63877E-02 0.70045E-02 0.75969E-02 0.81596E-02 0.86888E-02 0.91823E-02 0.96391E-02 0.10059E-01 0.10444E-01 0.10794E-01 0.11112E-01 (g) 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00 160.00 165.00 170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00 225.00 230.00 235.00 240.00 245.00 250.00 255.00 260.00 265.00 270.00 275.00 280.00 285.00 290.00 295.00 300.00 0.28800E-03 0.26018E-03 0.23464E-03 0.21136E-03 0.19022E-03 0.17109E-03 0.15384E-03 0.13830E-03 0.12434E-03 0.11178E-03 0.10051E-03 0.90395E-04 0.81311E-04 0.73154E-04 0.65828E-04 0.59247E-04 0.53333E-04 0.48017E-04 0.43237E-04 0.38938E-04 0.35070E-04 0.31590E-04 0.28457E-04 0.25636E-04 0.23097E-04 0.20810E-04 0.18751E-04 0.16895E-04 0.15224E-04 0.13719E-04 0.12362E-04 0.11140E-04 0.10039E-04 0.11400E-01 0.11660E-01 0.11895E-01 0.12106E-01 0.12297E-01 0.12468E-01 0.12622E-01 0.12760E-01 0.12884E-01 0.12996E-01 0.13097E-01 0.13187E-01 0.13268E-01 0.13341E-01 0.13407E-01 0.13467E-01 0.13520E-01 0.13568E-01 0.13611E-01 0.13650E-01 0.13685E-01 0.13717E-01 0.13745E-01 0.13771E-01 0.13794E-01 0.13815E-01 0.13833E-01 0.13850E-01 0.13866E-01 0.13879E-01 0.13892E-01 0.13903E-01 0.13913E-01 TUT VLEACH version 2.0, 1993. Developed by : Varadhan Ravi and Jeffrey A. Johnson (Dynamac) Center for Subsurface Modeling Support Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1198 Ada, OK 74820 L'Henri Simulation. 1 polygons. Timestep = 1.00 years. Simulation length = 300.00 years. Printout every 5.00 years. Vertical profile stored every Koc = 364.00 ml/g, 0.12854E-01cu.ft./g Kh = 0.92300 (dimensionless) . Aqueous solubility = 150.00 mg/1, 4.2476 g/cu.ft Free air diffusion coefficient = .66000 sq. m/day, 2593.1 5.00 years. sq.ft./yr Polygon 1 Polygon I Polygon area = 1.0000 sq. ft. 100 cells, each cell 0.200 ft. thick. Soil Properties: Bulk density = 1.5300 g/ml, 43325. g/cu.ft. Porosity = 0.4000 Volumetric water content = 0.3000 Organic carbon content = 0.00600000 Recharge Rate = 0.40000001 ft/yr Cone, in recharge water = 0.00000 mg/1, 0.00000 Atmospheric concentration = 0.00000 mg/1, 0.00000 Water table has a fixed concentration of 0.00000 mg/1, with respect to gas diffusion. g/cu.ft g/cu.ft 0.00000 g/ TUT VLEACH version 2.0, 1993. Developed by Varadhan Ravi and Jeffrey A. Johnson (Dynamac) Center for Subsurface Modeling Support Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1198 Ada, OK 74820 L'Henri Simulation. Polygon 1 At time = 0.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.72118E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.23440E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.26109 g/sq.ft. 0.29174 9/sq.: Polygon 1 At time = 5.00, total mass in vadose zone • Mass in gas phase = 0.71119E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.23115E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.25747 g/sq.ft. 0.28770 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 0.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.40439E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11949E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 36120E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.41993E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.40439E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.34925E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.40439E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 .11949E-04g/sq.ft. 'Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.36120E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.41993E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.40439E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.34925E-07g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 10.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.70190E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.22814E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.25411 g/sq.ft. 0.28394 g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 5.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.37584E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.60749E-04g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.30944E-02g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.60333E-03g/sq. ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.37585E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84750E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.78023E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.72698E-04g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.67065E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10233E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 78024E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.11921E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 15.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.28029 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 69289rJ-02g/sq. ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.22521E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.25084 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 10.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.36449E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.15043E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26642E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.83044E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .36450E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16671E-06g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.11447E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.22312E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.93706E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18537E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11447E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.28592E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 20.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.27659 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.68374E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.22223E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.24753 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 15.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.37009E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.29522E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.23043E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11013E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.37009E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.20722E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.15148E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.51834E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.11675E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.29550E-02g/sq.ft. TUT O0.8 0.1 £3 6 Total inflow at boundaries = -0.15148E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.30734E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 25.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.27267 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.67404E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .21908E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.24402 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 20.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.39231E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.50865E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.20016E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.14128E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.39231E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.23283E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0 .19071E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.10270E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.13677E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.43678E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.19071E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.30920E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 30.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.26837 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.66340E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.21562E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.24017 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 25.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 43038E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 80041E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.17456E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 .17579E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.43039E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13830E-06g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.23375E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.18274E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.15422E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.61257E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.23375E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .44890E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 35.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.26354 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 65147E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.21174E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.23585 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 30.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.48279E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11737E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.15279E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.21264E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.48280E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.15274E-06g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28203E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 30011E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.16950E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 82520E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28203E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.60163E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 40.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.25807 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.63794E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .20735E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.23095 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 35.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.54714E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 .16239E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.13419E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.25056E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.54714E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13970E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.33674E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 .46250E-02g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.18292E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10758E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.33675E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.61467E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 45.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.25186 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.62261E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.20237E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.22540 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 40.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.62019E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.21384E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.11821E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.28814E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.62020E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40047E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TUT 008 0183 Change in Total Mass = -0.39876E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.67635E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.19474E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 .13639E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.39877E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.65565E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 50.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.24488 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.60535E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.19676E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.21915 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 45.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.69817E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.26981E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.10443E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.32395E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.69819E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.14435E-06g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.46858E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.94616E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.20518E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16879E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.46859E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.79721E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 55.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.23711 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.58614E-02g/sq. ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.19Q51E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.21220 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 50.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.77707E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.32794E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.92479E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.35666E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.77708E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.69849E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.54628E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.12741E-01g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.21443E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.20445E-01g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.54629E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.86427E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 2. At time = 60.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.22858 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.56506E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.18366E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.20457 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 55.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.85291E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 38567E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.82085E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.38516E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.85291E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.91270E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.63157E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.16598E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.22264E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0 .24297E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.63158E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.95367E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 65.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.21936 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 54226E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.17625E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.19631 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 60.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.92214E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.44054E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.73005E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water, table = -0.40860E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.92214E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.39116E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.72379E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.21003E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.22994E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.28383E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.72380E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.99838E-06g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 70.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.20954 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.51799E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.16836E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.18753 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 65.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.98181E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.49033E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.65047E-03g/sq.ft, TUT 008 0189 Diffusion in from water table = -0.42644E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.98182E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.95926E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.82197E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.25906E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.23645E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.32647E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.82198E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.10952E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 75.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.19925 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.49254E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .16009E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.17831 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 70.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10298E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.53330E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.58048E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.43844E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10298E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.41910E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.92495E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.31239E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.24225E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.37032E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 92496E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.11325E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 80.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.18860 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.46622E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.15153E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.16878 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 75.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10647E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.56819E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.51874E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.44464E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10647E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.82888E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.10314 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.36921E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.24744E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.41478E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10314 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.12070E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 85.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.17774 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.43937E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.14281E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.15906 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 80.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.l0860E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.59427E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.46413E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.44532E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.l0860E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.31665E~07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.11400 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.42864E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.25208E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.45931E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11400 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .12368E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 90.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.16680 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.41233E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.13402E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.14928 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 85.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10939E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.61134E-02g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.41572E-03g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.44095E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10939E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 2887lE-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.12494 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.48977E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.25624E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.50341E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.12494 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.12591E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 95.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.15591 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.38541E-02g/sq.ft. •lass in liquid phase * 0 .l2527E-Olg/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.13953 g/sq.ft. TUT Since last printout at time = 90.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10890E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.6l962E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.37269E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.43212E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10890E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.44703E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.13583 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0 . 55174E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.25996E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.54662E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13583 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13113E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 100.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.14518 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.35890E-02g/sq.ft. . Mass in liquid phase = 0.11665E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12993 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 95.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10726E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.61970E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.33439E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.4l950E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10726E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.86613E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.14656 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.61370E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26331E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.58857E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14656 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13858E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 105.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.13472 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.33303E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10824E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12057 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 100.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10462E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.61240E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.30023E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.40379E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10462E-Olg/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = -0.37253E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TU f Change in Total Mass = -0.15702 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.67494E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26631E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.62895E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.15702 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13858E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 110.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.12461 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.30803E-02g/sq. ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10012E-01g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.11152 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 105.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.10114E-01g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.59872E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26971E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.38570E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10114E-01g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.52154E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.16713 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.73482E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26901E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.66752E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.16713 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.14603E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 115.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.11491 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.28406E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.92326E-02g/sq. ft. Mass sorbed = 0.10284 g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 110.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.96984E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.57973E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.24242E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.36588E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.96985E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.32596E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.17683 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.79279E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.27143E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.70410E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.17683 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.14901E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 TUT no s 0.1.9:: At time = 120.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.10568 g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.26123E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.84908E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.94574E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 115.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.92323E-02g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.55652E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.21798E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.34491E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 92324E-0.2g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.38184E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.18606 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.84844E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.27361E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.73860E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.18606 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.15497E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 125.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.96947E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.23965E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.77893E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.86761E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 120.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 87309E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.53014E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.19608E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.32334E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.87309E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.26077E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.19479 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.90146E-01g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.27557E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.77093E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.19480 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .15795E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 130.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.88739E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.21936E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.71299E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.79415E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 125.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.82079E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.50154E-02g/sq.ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.17643E-03g/sq. ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.30162E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.82080E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.35390E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.20300 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = Total inflow at boundaries = -0.20300 Mass discrepancy = 0.16093E-05g/sq.ft. g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft -0.95161E-01g/sq.ft -0.27734E-01g/sq.ft. -0.80109E-01g/sq.ft. g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 135.00, total mass in vadose zone •• Mass in gas phase = 0 . 20039E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.65131E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0 . 72546E-01g/sq.ft. 0.81063E-01g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 130.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.76756E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.47158E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.15879E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.28010E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.76756E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.22817E-07g/sq.ft. ^Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.21068 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft -0.99877E-01g/sq.ft -0.27892E-01g/sq.ft -0.82910E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21068 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .16242E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 140.00, total mass in vadose zone Mass in gas phase = 0 .18273E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.59392E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.66153E-01g/sq. ft 0.73919E-01g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 135.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.71438E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.44099E-02g/sq.ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.14295E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.25910E-02g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.71438E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.12573E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.21782 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft. -0.10429 g/sq.ft. -0.28035E-01g/sq.ft. -0.85501E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21782 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16391E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 145.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.67298E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.16636E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.54072E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.60227E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 140.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.66210E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.41040E-02g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.12871E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.23883E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.66211E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.21420E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.22444 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.10839 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28164E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.87890E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.22444 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16689E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 150.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.61185E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.15125E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.49160E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.54756E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 145.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.61137E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.38030E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.11590E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.21948E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 61137E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.83819E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.23056 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11219 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28280E-01g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.90084E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.23056 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16540E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 155.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.55558E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.13734E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.44639E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.49721E-01g/sq.ft. ("LIT OO8 Since last printout at time = 150.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 56267E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in'from atmbsphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.35108E-02g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.10439E-03g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.20115E-02g/sq. f t. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.56267E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.74506E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.23618 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11570 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28384E-01g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.92096E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.23618 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16689E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon l At time = 160.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 50394E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.12457E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.40490E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.45100E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 155.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.51635E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.32303E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.94025E-04g/sq. f t. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18391E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.51635E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17229E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.24135 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11893 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 28478E-01g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.93935E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.24135 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16838E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 165.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.45668E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.11289E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.36693E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.40870E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 160.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.47264E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.29636E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 84699E-04g/sq. ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16781E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.47264E-02g/sq. f t. Mass discrepancy = 0.60536E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TUT OOS 0197 Change in Total Mass = -0.24607 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12190 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28563E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.95613E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.24607 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16838E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 170.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.41351E-01g/sq. ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.10222E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.33224E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.37007E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 165.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.43167E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.27l20E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.76304E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in.from water table = -0.15284E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.43167E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.11176E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.25039 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12461 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28639E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.97l41E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.25039 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.16987E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 175.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.37416E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.92493E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.30063E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.33485E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 170.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.39350E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.24763E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.68746E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.13899E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.39350E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18626E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.25432 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.12709 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0-28708E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.98531E-01g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.25433 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0,17583E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 TUT COS O198 At time = 180.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.33835E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.83641E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.27186E-02g/sq.ft. /""""""•Mass sorbed = 0.30280E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 175.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.35810E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.22568E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.61939E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.12622E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.35810E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.76834E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.25791 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12934 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28770E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.99794E-01g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.25791 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17583E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 185.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.30581E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.75597E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.24571E-02g/sq. ft. Mass sorbed = 0.27368E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 180.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.32541E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.20533E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.55809E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11450E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.32541E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.60536E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.26116 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13140 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28826E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10094 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26116 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 190.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.27628E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.68296E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.22198E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.24725E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 185.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.29534E-02g/sq. f t. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.18655E-02g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.50288E-04g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.10376E-02g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.29534E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.32596E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.26411 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13326 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28876E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10198 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26411 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 195.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.24950E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.61677E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.20047E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.22329E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 190.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.26776E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.16928E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.45314E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.93948E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26776E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.12806E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.26679 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13496 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28921E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10292 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26679 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 200.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.22525E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.55681E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.18098E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.20158E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 195.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.24254E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.15345E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.40833E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.85003E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.24254E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.58208E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.26922 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13649 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28962E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10377 g/sq.ft. TUT 008 0200 Total inflow at boundaries = -0.26922 g/sg.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 205.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.20330E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 . 50255E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .16334E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.18194E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 200.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 2l951E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.13897E-02g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.36796E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.76862E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.21951E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13970E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.27141 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13788 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.28999E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10453 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27141 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 210.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 .18344E-01g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0 .45347E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .14739E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.16417E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 205.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.19854E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.12577E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.33159E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.69464E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.19855E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.10710E-07g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.27340 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.13914 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29032E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10523 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27340 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 215.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.16549E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 .40910E-03g/sq. f t. Mass in liquid phase = 0.13297E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.14811E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 210.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.17948E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.11374E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29882E-04g/sq.ft. - Diffusion in from water table = -0 . 62750E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.17948E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 . 69849E-09g/sq. f t. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.27519 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14027 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29062E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10586 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27519 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .18179E-05g/sq. f t. Polygon 1 At time = 220.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.14928E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.36902E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0 .11994E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.13359E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 215.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .16216E-02g/sq. ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.10281E-02g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.26929E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.56665E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.162l6E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .41910E-08g/sq. f t. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.27681 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14130 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29089E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10642 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27681 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0 .18179E-05g/sq. f t. Polygon 1 At time = 225.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.13463E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.33281E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.10817E-02g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.12049E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 220.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.14646E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.92881E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.24268E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.51153E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.14646E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.22119E-08g/sq. f t. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TUT COS O7O? Change in Total Mass = -0.27828 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14223 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29113E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10693 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27828 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 230.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.12141E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.30012E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.97548E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.10865E-01g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 225.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.13223E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.83881E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.21870E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.46165E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.13223E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.43074E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.27960 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14307 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29135E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10740 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.27960 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 235.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.10947E-01g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.27062E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.87959E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.97972E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 230.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.11935E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.75728E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.19709E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.41654E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.11935E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13970E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28079 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14383 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29155E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0,10781 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28080 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 240.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.24400E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.79305E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.88333E-02g/sq.ft. 0.98704E-02g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 235.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .10770E-02g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.68348E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.17762E-04g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.37577E-03g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.10770E-02g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.24447E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28187 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft. -0.14451 g/sq.ft. -0.29173E-01g/sq.ft, -0.10819 g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28187 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 245.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.21998E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.71498E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.79638E-02g/sq.ft. 0.88987E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 240.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 97166E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft Advection in from water table = -0.61673E-03g/sq.ft Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.16007E-04g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.33893E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 . 97167E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40745E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28284 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft. -0.14513 g/sq.ft. -0.29189E-01g/sq.ft. -0.10853 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28284 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 250.00, total mass in vadose zone Mass in gas phase = 0.19831E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.64456E-03g/sq.ft Mass sorbed = 0.71794E-02g/sq.ft 0.80223E-02g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 245.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.87648E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.55639E-03g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.14426E-04g/sq.ft TIJT 008 0204 Diffusion in from water table = -0.30567E-03g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.87648E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0;16880E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28372 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28372 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft -0.14568 g/sq.ft, -0.29203E-01g/sq.ft. -0.10883 g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 255.00, total mass in vadose zone Mass in gas phase = 0.17877L-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.58105E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.64719E-02g/sq.ft. 0.72318E-02g/sq.ft Since last printout at time = 250.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 . 79050E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.50187E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.13001E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.27564E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.79050E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.23283E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28451 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft, -0.14619 g/sq.ft, -0.29216E-01g/sq.ft. -0.10911 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28451 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 260.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.16115E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.52377E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.58340E-02g/sq.ft. 0.65189E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 255.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.7l287E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.45262E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.11717E-04g/sq.ft, Diffusion in from water table = -0.24853E-03g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.71287E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.15134E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28522 Advection in from atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft. -0.14664 g/sq.ft. -0.29228E-01g/sq.ft. -0.10936 g/sq.ft, TUT O08 Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28522 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 265.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.58761E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 .14526E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.47212E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.52587E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 260.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.64280E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.40817E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.10559E-04g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.22408E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.64280E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.13388E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28586 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14705 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29238E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10958 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28587 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 270.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.52965E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.13093E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.42556E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.47400E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 265.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.57957E-03g/sq. f t. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.36804E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.95165E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.20201E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.57957E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.40745E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28644 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14741 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 29248E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10978 g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28645 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 275.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.47740E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0 .11801E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0-38357E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.42724E-02g/sq.ft. TUT OO8 O206 Since last printout at time = 270.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.52252E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.33183E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.85765E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.18211E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.52252E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.22119E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28697 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14775 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29256E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10997 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28697 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq. ft. Polygon 1 At time = 280.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.43029E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.10637E-03g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.34573E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.38508E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 275.00 Change in Total Mass = -0 .47106E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.29916E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.77294E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.16417E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.47106E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.14552E-08g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28744 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14805 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29264E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11013 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28744 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq. ft. Polygon 1 At time = 285.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0 . 38783E-02g/sq. f t. Mass in gas phase = 0.95871E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.31161E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.34708E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 280.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.42464E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.26970E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.69659E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.14798E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0-42464E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.78580E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 TUT oos 0207 Change in Total Mass = -0.28786 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14832 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29271E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11028 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28786 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.17881E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 290.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.34955E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.86409E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.28085E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.31283E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 285.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.38278E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.24312E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.62779E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.13339E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .38279E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.84401E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time =0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28825 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14856 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29277E-01g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.11041 g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28825 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 At time = 295.00, total mass in vadose zone = 0.31505E-02g/sq.ft. Mass in gas phase = 0.77880E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.25313E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.28195E-02g/sq.ft. Since last printout at time = 290.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.34504E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.21915E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.56579E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.12023E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0 .34504E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.55297E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28859 g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft. Advection in from water table = -0.14878 g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0.29283E-01g/sq.ft Diffusion in from water table = -0.11053 g/sq.ft Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28859 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. Polygon 1 TUT 008 070 At time = 300.00, total mass in vadose zone = Mass in gas phase = 0.70191E-04g/sq.ft. Mass in liquid phase = 0.22814E-03g/sq.ft. Mass sorbed = 0.25411E-02g/sq.ft. 0.28395E-02g/sq.ft, Since last printout at time = 295.00 Change in Total Mass = -0.31101E-03g/sq.ft. Advection in from atmosphere = 0.00000 g/sq.ft, Advection in from water table = -0.19754E-03g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from atmosphere = -0 . 50990E-05g/sq.ft. Diffusion in from water table = -0.10837E-03g/sq.ft. Total inflow at boundaries = -0.31101E-03g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.78580E-09g/sq.ft. Since beginning of run at time = 0.0 Change in Total Mass = -0.28890 Advection in froiu atmosphere = Advection in from water table = Diffusion in from atmosphere = Diffusion in from water table = g/sq.ft. 0.00000 g/sq.ft, -0.14898 g/sq.ft, -0.29288E-01g/sq.ft, -0.11064 g/sq.ft, Total inflow at boundaries = -0.28890 g/sq.ft. Mass discrepancy = 0.18179E-05g/sq.ft. GROUNDWATER IMPACT OF POLYGON Time 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50 .00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00 160.00 165.00 Mass per area 0.43188E 0.66407E 0.98086E 0.13966E 0.19214E 0.25583E 0.33001E 0.41295E 0.50199E 0.59376E 0.68460E 0.77083E 0.84914E 0.91677E 0.97174E 0.10128E 0.10396E 0.10523E 0.10517E 0.10392E 0.10162E 0.98442E 0.94561E 0.90144E 0.85348E 0.80315E 0.75168E 0.70009E 0.64923E 0.59978E 0.55223E 0.50695E 0.46417E (g/sq.ft.) -03 -03 -03 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -01 -01 -01 -01 -01 -01 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 -02 Total Mass (g) 0.43188E-03 0.66407E-03 0.98086E-03 0.13966E-02 0.19214E-02 0.25583E-02 0.33001E-02 0.41295E-02 0.50199E-02 0.59376E-02 0.68460E-02 0.77083E-02 0.84914E-02 0.91677E-02 0.97174E-02 0.10128E-01 0.10396E-01 0.10523E-01 0.10517E-01 0.10392E-01 0.10162E-01 0.98442E-02 0.94561E-02 0.90144E-02 0.85348E-02 0.80315E-02 0.75168E-02 0.70009E-02 0.64923E-02 0.59978E-02 0.55223E-02 0.50695E-02 0.46417E-02 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00 160.00 165.00 170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00 225.00 230.00 235.00 240.00 245.00 250.00 255.00 260.00 265.00 270.00 275.00 280.00 285.00 290.00 295.00 300.00 0.70009E-02 0.64923E-02 0.59978E-02 0.55223E-02 0.50695E-02 0.46417E-02 0.42404E-02 0.38662E-02 0.35190E-02 0.31983E-02 0.29031E-02 0.26323E-02 0.23845E-02 0.21583E-02 0.19523E-02 0.17649E-02 0.15947E-02 0.14403E-02 0.13005E-02 0.11738E-02 0.10592E-02 0.95566E-03 0.86205E-03 0.77750E-03 0.70116E-03 0.63224E-03 0.57005E-03 0.51394E-03 0.46333E-03 0.41768E-03 0.37651E-03 0.33938E-03 0.30591E-03 0.18979 0.19628 0.20228 0.20780 0.21287 0.21751 0.22175 0.22562 0.22914 0.23234 0.23524 0.23787 0.24026 0.24241 0.24437 0.24613 0.24773 0.24917 0.25047 0.25164 0.25270 ,25366 ,25452 0.25529 0.25600 0.25663 0.25720 0.25771 0.25818 0.25859 0.25897 0.25931 0.25962 0 0 TUT 008 O21O 170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00 225.00 230.00 235.0.0 240.00 245.00 250.00 255.00 260.00 265.00 270.00 275.00 280.00 285.00 290.00 295.00 300.00 ***************** ***************** 'OTAL GROUNDWATER Time (yr) 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 0.42404E-02 0.38662E-02 0.35190E-02 0.31983E-02 0.29031E-02 0.26323E-02 0.23845E-02 0.21583E-02 0.19523E-02 0.17649E-02 0.15947E-02 0.14403E-02 0.13005E-02 0.11738E-02 0.10592E-02 0.95566E-03 0.86205E-03 0.77750E-03 0.70116E-03 0.63224E-03 0.57005E-03 0.51394E-03 0.46333E-03 0.41768E-03 0.37651E-03 0.33938E-03 0.30591E-03 r************l r************i IMPACT Mass (g) 0.43188E-03 0.66407E-03 0.98086E-03 0.13966E-02 0.19214E-02 0.25583E-02 0.33001E-02 0.41295E-02 0.50199E-02 0.59376E-02 0.68460E-02 0.77083E-02 0.84914E-02 0.91677E-02 0.97174E-02 0.10128E-01 0.10396E-01 0.10523E-01 0.10517E-01 0.10392E-01 0.10162E-01 0.98442E-02 0.94561E-02 0.90144E-02 0.85348E-02 0.80315E-02 0.75168E-02 0.42404E-02 0.38662E-02 0.35190E-02 0.31983E-02 0.29031E-02 0.26323E-02 0.23845E-02 0.21583E-02 0.19523E-02 0.17649E-02 0.15947E-02 0.14403E-02 0.13005E-02 0.11738E-02 0.10592E-02 0.95566E-03 0.86205E-03 0.77750E-03 0.70116E-03 0.63224E-03 0.57005E-03 0.51394E-03 0.46333E-03 0.41768E-03 0.37651E-03 0.33938E-03 0.30591E-03 Cumulative Mass 0.43188E-03 0.10960E-02 0.20768E-02 0.34734E-02 0.53948E-02 0.79531E-02 0.11253E-01 0.15383E-01 0.20403E-01 0.26340E-01 0.33186E-01 0.40894E-01 0.49386E-01 0.58554E-01 0.68271E-01 0.78399E-01 0.88795E-01 0.99318E-01 0.10984 0.12023 0.13039 0.14023 0.14969 0.15870 0.16724 0.17527 0.18279 (g) TUT VLEACH version 2 . 0 , 1993. Developed by : Varadhan Ravi and Jeffrey A. Johnson (Dynamac) Center for Subsurface Modeling Support Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1198 Ada, OK 74820 L'Henri Simulation. 1 polygons. Timestep = 1.00 years. Simulation length = 300.00 years. Printout every 5.00 years. Vertical profile stored every 5.00 years. Koc = 364.00 ml/g, 0.12854E-01cu.ft./g Kh = 0.92300 (dimensionless). Aqueous solubility = 150.00 mg/1, 4.2476 g/cu.ft Free air diffusion coefficient = .66000 sq. m/day, 2593.1 sq.ft./yr Polygon 1 Polygon I Polygon area = 1.0000 sq. ft. 100 cells, each cell 0.200 ft. thick. Soil Properties: Bulk density = 1.5300 g/ml, 43325. g/cu.ft. Porosity = 0.4000 Volumetric water content = 0.3000 Organic carbon content = 0.00600000 Recharge Rate = 0.40000001 ft/yr Cone, in recharge water = 0.00000 mg/1, 0.00000 g/cu.ft Atmospheric concentration = 0.00000 mg/1, 0.00000 g/cu.ft Water table has a fixed concentration of 0.00000 mg/1, 0.00000 with respect to gas diffusion. g/