VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Collection
Federal Reference
Sub-shelf
GovInfo
Kind
Reference Document
Island
St. Croix
Date
2005-05-06
Pages
1
Text
Native Text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MORELLA CHARLERY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2004-0065 v. ) ) STX, INC. and P.A.M., INC., d/b/a ) GOLDEN ROCK PHARMACY, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion Dismiss filed by Defendant, P.A.M., Inc on May 6, 2005. Plaintiff Morella Charlery opposes such Motion. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant P.A.M., Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2008. _________________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Case: 1:04-cv-00065-TJS Document #: 30 Filed: 07/02/08 Page 1 of 1

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00065/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00065-2.pdf

SHA-256 23d29d0acebea346186de977de41fd45de73f6248aa91ec42ba5cf3b5d7c4b2c

Re-using this document

A work of the United States Government. Not subject to copyright in the United States under 17 U.S.C. § 105, and therefore in the public domain from the moment it was created.

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-23d29d0acebe

Document text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MORELLA CHARLERY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2004-0065 v. ) ) STX, INC. and P.A.M., INC., d/b/a ) GOLDEN ROCK PHARMACY, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion Dismiss filed by Defendant, P.A.M., Inc on May 6, 2005. Plaintiff Morella Charlery opposes such Motion. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant P.A.M., Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2008. _________________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Case: 1:04-cv-00065-TJS Document #: 30 Filed: 07/02/08 Page 1 of 1