USA v. LUCO, HUBE et al.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CRIM. NO. 2007-0003 v. ) ) HUBE LUCO ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a letter submitted by Defendant Hube Luco requesting the return of his passport. The Court construes Defendant’s letter as a Motion for Order Directing the Return of Passport. After consideration, it appears to the Court that good cause exists to grant Defendant’s request. However, the Court acknowledges that Plaintiff has not been provided with adequate notice of Defendant’s Motion. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 15 days from the date hereof to file a response to Defendant’s Motion for Order Directing the Return of Passport. ENTERED this 16 day of April, 2008. _______________/s/_______________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Case: 1:07-cr-00003-RLF Document #: 85 Filed: 04/16/08 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cr-00003/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cr-00003-0.pdf
SHA-256 2e06a10d5f7fce18ee076e6643231cc8f96087a468c5164d0b30b6c7ce1a2765
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-2e06a10d5f7f
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CRIM. NO. 2007-0003 v. ) ) HUBE LUCO ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a letter submitted by Defendant Hube Luco requesting the return of his passport. The Court construes Defendant’s letter as a Motion for Order Directing the Return of Passport. After consideration, it appears to the Court that good cause exists to grant Defendant’s request. However, the Court acknowledges that Plaintiff has not been provided with adequate notice of Defendant’s Motion. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 15 days from the date hereof to file a response to Defendant’s Motion for Order Directing the Return of Passport. ENTERED this 16 day of April, 2008. _______________/s/_______________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Case: 1:07-cr-00003-RLF Document #: 85 Filed: 04/16/08 Page 1 of 1