TCRMP 2013: St. Thomas, survey, part 2
SITE SUMMARIES 231 HIND BANK Descrip(on. The Hind Bank is a mesophotic tertiary bank in depths of 38 – 42 m. The reef is part of a patchy complex of star coral (Orbicella spp.) dominated reefs that stretch across the eastern Red Hind Marine Conservation District. The Hind Bank has been monitored since 2003, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. The Hind Bank is within a no-‐take marine reserve and fish populations are recovering and robust. The Hind Bank monitoring site hosts a multispecies spawning aggregation, including a recovering mating population of the commercially important red hind grouper (Epinephelus guttatus). Threats. The Hind Bank and surrounding dense reefs are somewhat buffered from high thermal stress, but they are susceptible to chronic coral white diseases. Periodic disease outbreaks follow high thermal stress. The Indo-‐Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans) has formed dense populations within the study area and may be affecting native fish populations. Figure 139. Hind Bank (top) Location. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/63e67b7bf74b2e1206f20635/t/6655087f3d64a040db27f744/1716848801954/TCRMP-Coral+Reefs+Report+2013+STT+Survey+P2.pdf
SHA-256 2e0a418a0b5c9f9c38cadea557eda5e68215833c2fdf31be49b61066ad637d56
Re-using this document
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-2e0a418a0b5c
Document text
SITE SUMMARIES 231 HIND BANK Descrip(on. The Hind Bank is a mesophotic tertiary bank in depths of 38 – 42 m. The reef is part of a patchy complex of star coral (Orbicella spp.) dominated reefs that stretch across the eastern Red Hind Marine Conservation District. The Hind Bank has been monitored since 2003, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. The Hind Bank is within a no-‐take marine reserve and fish populations are recovering and robust. The Hind Bank monitoring site hosts a multispecies spawning aggregation, including a recovering mating population of the commercially important red hind grouper (Epinephelus guttatus). Threats. The Hind Bank and surrounding dense reefs are somewhat buffered from high thermal stress, but they are susceptible to chronic coral white diseases. Periodic disease outbreaks follow high thermal stress. The Indo-‐Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans) has formed dense populations within the study area and may be affecting native fish populations. Figure 139. Hind Bank (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. HIND BANK 232 Figure 140. Hind Bank benthic current speed (40m depth). Benthic temperature record at 20, 30, and 40 m depth. Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Hind Bank has moderately strong unidirectional near-‐benthic currents that are dominated by a north to south components. Currents can be moderate to strong (>20cm s-‐1). Current speeds are based on near-‐continuous ADCP deployments from February 2005 to May 2012, with measurements at 30 or 60 min. intervals. Oscillatory currents are not known from the Hind Bank. Temperature. Benthic temperatures at the Hind Bank were augmented with a subsurface buoyed thermistor string carrying thermistors at 20 and 30 m depth. Benthic temperatures show strong inter-‐annual variability, but were much cooler than temperatures in the mixed layer at 20 m depth. This was particularly evident in 2010; when temperatures were warmest at 20 m in late August during coral bleaching, temperatures were unseasonably cool on the bottom. The 30 m thermistor was intermediate, with warming to near the bleaching threshold in 2010, but not surpassing the threshold like the 20 m depth. One caveat for the accuracy of the 20 and 30 m thermistors is that they can change depth to some degree by bowing of the buoy line by currents. N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Current Speed (m s -1) 0.4 - 0.5 0.3 - 0.4 0.2 - 0.3 0.1 - 0.2 0.0 - 0.1 J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2008 2010 2009 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2008 2010 2009 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2005 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 233 Benthic Community. The Hind Bank site is dominated by boulder star corals (Orbicella spp.), but also has a high abundance of lettuce corals (Agaricia spp.). The Hind Bank site lost 21.8% of its coral cover in the 2005 bleaching event, but had regained 71.4% of this cover by 2011. The algal community is co-‐dominated by epilithic algae and the macroalga Lobophora variegata. There is also high representation of crustose coralline algae and other unidentified macroalgal species. Coral Health. Bleaching during the 2005 event was nearly indistinguishable from background levels of bleaching in both prevalence and extent. The prevalence of bleaching was actually higher during the 2010 coral bleaching event. In later years the high prevalence of moderate prevalence, low colony extent bleaching was often associated with granular bleaching. This bleaching pattern shows pigmented spots surrounded by bleached tissue. Coral diseases are common at the Hind Bank and may be increasing. White disease was the dominant disease, and 2011 showed a peak of disease signs. In 2009 there was a high prevalence of intercostal mortality syndrome, which is only known from mesophotic coral reefs (Smith et al. 2010b). Old partial mortality increased after the 2005 bleaching event and the high prevalence was not reduced until 2011. Recent partial mortality prevalence is often high and reflects the impacts of disease and predation. Figure 141. Hind Bank. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. HIND BANK 234 Figure 142. Hind Bank benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 235 Fish Community. The Hind Bank is characterized by a high number of piscivorous fish. The site is within the Marine Conservation District (MCD) and is protected year round from all fishing, except surface trolling. It is the spawning site for several species including red hind, mutton snapper, tiger grouper and schoolmaster snapper. Surveys often coincide with the occurrence of schoolmaster snapper. This drives up the relative piscivore biomass; however, there are also commonly members of the pelagic jack family (Carangidae) and large barracuda observed. Invertivores are dominated by goatfish as the likely result of the proximity of sand areas around reefs. Creole wrasse are not nearly as dominant as on other mesophotic sites. Herbivores are less common than on nearshore sites and are dominated by adult or semi-‐adult princess parrotfish. Juvenile parrotfish and surgeonfish are uncommon, as on all mesophotic sites. Yellowhead wrasse are fairly common on the Hind Bank, however bluehead wrasse are not. HIND BANK 236 Figure 143. The Hind Bank East fish community by absolute and relative biomass. Herbivores stoplight parrotfish queen parrotfish ocean surgeonfish redband parrotfish princess parrotfish blue tang striped parrotfish doctorfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Invertivores queen trigger mutton snapper Nassau grouper porkfish blackbar soldierfish permit red hind hogfish clown wrasse French grunt bluestriped grunt white grunt cottonwick squirrelfish Spanish hogfish longsnout butterflyfish yellowhead wrasse yellowtail hamlet dusky squirrelfish spotted goatfish Caesar grunt shy hamlet fairy basselet bandtail puffer Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Planktivores yellowtail snapper creole wrasse blue chromis black jack creolefish bicolor damsel sunshinefish Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Piscivores horse-eye jack schoolmaster yellowjack bar jack dog snapper red lionfish cero mahogany snapper graysby gray snapper king mackeral black hamlet trumpetfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 2e+4 4e+4 6e+4 8e+4 1e+5 SITE SUMMARIES 237 LITTLE SAINT JAMES Descrip(on. The Little St. James site is a midshelf hardbottom reef in depths of 16-‐22 m. The reef is a patch reef surrounded by sand/rhodolith plain. Little St. James has been monitored since 2005, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. The Little St. James site is just outside the St. Thomas East End Reserve and supports occasional high densities of snappers, grunts, and queen trigger. Threats. Commercial fisherman target the Little St. James site and active and derelict fish traps are in high abundance. The site is down-‐current of development on Little St. James Island and is potentially threatened by land-‐based source of pollution. Figure 144. Little St. James. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. LITTLE SAINT JAMES 238 Figure 145. Little St. James benthic temperature record (19m depth). Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Currents have not been directly measured at St. James. Unidirectional benthic currents have only been weak during monitoring. Strong wave-‐driven oscillatory currents may take place, as evidenced by the high proportion of gorgonians and Sargassum spp. at the site. Temperature. Benthic temperatures at St. James can be high during warm years, such as 2010. J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 239 Benthic Community. The sparse coral community of the Little St. James site is diverse. There is a high proportion of rare species, such as Eusmilia fastigiatum, Madracis spp., and Mycetophyllia spp.. The site lost 16.5% of coral cover in the 2005 bleaching event but had apparently regained 376.2% of this loss by 2011. This large increase above bleaching losses may be explained by the fact that transects were not made permanent until 2007 and were then sited in areas with the densest coral. The sessile epibenthic community overall is largely composed of sponges and gorgonians. The algal community is dominated by the macroalgae Dictyota spp. and the Sargassum spp.. Lobophora variegata and epilithic algae are also in high proportional abundance. Coral Health. The coral community at Little St. James was highly affected by the 2005 coral bleaching event, with all corals assessed completely bleached. Half the corals were affected by low extent bleaching in 2010. Low-‐level bleaching is a common feature of the site. Diseases are less common, with the exception of a white disease outbreak that preceded the coral bleaching event in June 2005. Dark spots disease can also be common. Old partial mortality increased rapidly after the 2005 bleaching event. Recent partial mortality is not very prominent. Figure 146. Little St. James. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. LITTLE SAINT JAMES 240 Figure 147. Little St. James benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 241 Fish Community. The fish community of Little St. James differs slightly from those of the more developed reef habitats, perhaps representing a hard bottom fish community. Queen triggerfish and mutton snapper are far more common on Little St. James than on other TCRMP sites. Red hind are also very common, especially for a nearshore site. The reef is outside of the boundaries of the St. Thomas East End Reserves, and fish traps are observed regularly on the site. During parts of the year, grunts (French, and white) have been observed in huge numbers, and may use the site for spawning. Bar and yellow jacks are very common swimming in the water column above the Little St. James site, and the schoolmaster, gray, and mahogany snapper are the major benthic piscivores. All three of these species are considered ciguatoxic in this area and so are not targeted by hook and line or spear fishermen. LITTLE SAINT JAMES 242 Herbivores doctorfish stoplight parrotfish striped parrotfish blue tang redband parrotfish ocean surgeonfish princess parrotfish Beaugregory queen parrotfish yellowtail damsel threespot damsel greenblotch parrotfish dusky damsel Fish Biomass (g) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Invertivores queen trigger bluestriped grunt mutton snapper red hind French grunt yellowhead wrasse squirrelfish spotted goatfish harlequin bass saucereye porgy white grunt Spanish hogfish clown wrasse shy hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Planktivores tobaccofish bicolor damsel yellowtail snapper blue chromis creole wrasse ocean trigger brown chromis Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Piscivores bar jack schoolmaster gray snapper graysby horse-eye jack red lionfish mahogany snapper trumpetfish sand diver redspotted hawkfish black hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 SITE SUMMARIES 243 MAGENS BAY Descrip(on. The Magens Bay site is a nearshore fringing reef located along Peterborg Point in depths of 4 – 14 m. The reef has a sharp break in slope leading to a steep escarpment that terminates in a sand/sediment plain at the reef base. Magens Bay has been monitored since 2001. Outstanding Feature. The Magens Bay site is well protected northside reef near one of the most popular tourist beaches in the Caribbean. Threats. Magens Bay is in a highly enclosed embayment receiving a very large and developed watershed. Sediment run-‐off is high and deposition on reefs is favored by slow current speeds. In addition, leaky septic systems may impair bay waters. Recreational/artisanal fishers frequently fish this site with hand line and spear. Figure 148. Magens Bay. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. MAGENS BAY 244 Figure 149. Magens Bay current speed and benthic temperature record (9 m depth). Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Magens Bay has restricted water flow dominated by weak currents running counter or orthogonally to the left of the dominant wind direction. This may indicate that there is a counter flowing eddy. Current data are based on average data from Dec. 2006-‐Oct. 2007 7.5 m above the sensor head. Temperature. Magens Bay has low circulation, but temperatures are kept cooler by exposure to the Atlantic. Chlorophyll & Turbidity. Magens Bay is susceptible to very high chlorophyll and turbidity values indicating very high productivity that is likely fueled by terrestrial run-‐off. By blocking light this shallows the depth limits for coral growth and water column productivity favors heterotrophic organisms, such as sponges and gorgonians. Figure 150. Magens Bay chlorophyll (left) and turbidity (right) record (16 m depth). N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Current Speed (m s -1) 0.4 - 0.5 0.3 - 0.4 0.2 - 0.3 0.1 - 0.2 0.0 - 0.1 J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 245 Benthic Community. The sparse coral community at Magens Bay is very diverse, with no real dominance by any one species. The site lost 12.4% of its coral cover in the 2005 bleaching and has continued to lose coral, with a cover loss of 33.1% from 2005 pre-‐bleaching to 2011. Gorgonians and then sponges dominate the sessile epibenthic community. Epilithic algae and the macroalga Dictyota spp. dominate the algal community. Filamentous cyanobacteria are also common. There is a high proportion of sand/sediment around corals at the Magens Bay site. Coral Health. Corals were highly affected by the 2005 bleaching event, with about 80% of corals 80% affected across the colony surface. This site also showed a strong response to the 2010 bleaching event with about 60% of corals bleached at a low extent. Diseases can be high and are dominated by dark spots disease. Old partial mortality increased after the 2005 bleaching event and then declined, with a slight increase from 2009 to 2011. Recent partial mortality is common at the Magens Bay site, largely as the result of biting by territorial damselfish (Stegastes spp.; data not shown). Figure 151. Magens Bay. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. MAGENS BAY 246 Figure 152. Magens Bay benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 247 Fish Community. Magens Bay once supported its own rich fishery and was the notorious site of the only fatality by shark attack recorded in St. Thomas. The days of large, commercially important fish in Magens Bay have been gone since the 1970’s; however, the bay is connected to the deeper Puerto Rican shelf to the north and large sharks are known to frequent the bay. Tiger sharks are still caught commonly off either point defining the bay to the east or west. Anecdotally, hammerheads mate in the middle of Magens Bay during one moon phase of the year, and along the mile long sandy beach it is not uncommon to see young of the year sharks swimming in the clear water, suggesting that the deep protected bay is the pupping ground for at least one species of shark. Along the reef that is the TCRMP monitoring site, large fish are rare, and herbivores make up the bulk of the fish biomass. The largest fish swim along the reef edge, where occasional mahogany and lane snapper reside, along with grunts, goatfish and larger parrotfishes. Schools of wrasse, mixed with juvenile parrotfish, and damselfishes, occupy the top of the reef. The threespot damselfish is extremely prolific. No large groupers or snappers were observed in Magens Bay in 2012, the first year of fish monitoring. MAGENS BAY 248 Herbivores stoplight parrotfish redband parrotfish threespot damsel striped parrotfish doctorfish princess parrotfish dusky damsel queen parrotfish blue tang yellowtail damsel Beaugregory cocoa damsel ocean surgeonfish redtail parrotfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Invertivores French grunt red hind Caesar grunt blackbar soldierfish yellow goatfish yellowhead wrasse tomtate bluestriped grunt lane snapper squirrelfish slippery dick clown wrasse reef croaker yellowbelly hamlet dusky squirrelfish yellowtail hamlet checkered puffer Spanish hogfish harlequin bass Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Planktivores yellowtail snapper Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 Piscivores bar jack trumpetfish schoolmaster graysby mahogany snapper black hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SITE SUMMARIES 249 SAVANA ISLAND Descrip(on. The Savana Island site is a midshelf fringing reef facing the Atlantic Ocean to the northwest in depths of 5 – 17 m. The reef is a well-‐developed coral community atop bedrock, with some insipient carbonate accumulation. Savana has been monitored since 2003, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. Savana harbors behemoth colonies of boulder star coral (Orbicella faveolata) and a diverse and abundant fish community. Threats. Savana is threatened by warming ocean temperatures, as O. faveolata can be susceptible to bleaching, disease, and partial mortality. The area is also open to fishing and the occasional accumulation of debris can be seen. Figure 153. Savana. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef during the 2005 coral bleaching event. The dog snapper Lutjanus jocu) is approximately 50cm in length. SAVANA ISLAND 250 Figure 154. Savana benthic temperature record (10m depth). Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Currents have not been measured directly at Savana. Strong unidirectional currents can influence the surface near the site. Wave-‐driven oscillatory currents are common and occasionally strong. Temperature. Savana has temperatures cooler than other shallow sites, likely due to the proximity of the open Atlantic Ocean. J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 251 Benthic Community. Boulder star corals, predominately large (>2m wide) colonies of Orbicella faveolata, dominate the coral community at the Savana monitoring site. The site lost 45.2% of its coral cover in the 2005 bleaching event. Some of the largest losses occurred between 2010 and 2011, but there was no indication of the cause, since the site bleached moderately and no disease outbreaks were noted. Gorgonians and sponges are also prominent components of the sessile epibenthic animal community. Coral Health. The coral community at Savana was highly affected in the 2005 bleaching event, with 80% of corals affected on almost 90% of the colony surface. Bleaching was also very prominent in 2006, but at a lower extent. Bleaching was moderate during the 2010 bleaching event, with over 50% of colonies bleached at a low extent. Coral diseases can reach high prevalence and are diversely represented. Particularly noticeable is the dramatic outbreak of white disease in 2006. Dark spots disease has also affected a high proportion of corals from 2008 onwards. Old partial mortality increased markedly after the 2005 coral bleaching event and has declined only slightly. Recent partial mortality after the 2005 coral bleaching event was unprecedented for any site. Recent mortality has also been common after 2007 and is largely caused by bites from territorial damselfish (Stegastes spp.). Figure 155. Savana Island. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. SAVANA ISLAND 252 Figure 156. Savana Island benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 253 Fish Community. The Savana Island fish community is fairly small in biomass, but is quite diverse, and highlights the variety of benthic resources available to fishes in the area. The site is dominated by herbivores, but it also supports a diverse invertivore community. Planktivores in the quiet protected bay are limited to the smaller pomocentrids and wrasses. However, these fish groups are all quite prolific. The most numerous piscivore observed in the first year of fish monitoring was the schoolmaster snapper. One small yellowmouth grouper (11-‐20 cm) was observed on a belt transect, the first seen on a site in shallow water located near land. The area around Savana is highly fished with fish traps, and no large commercially important fish were seen in the bay. SAVANA ISLAND 254 Herbivores stoplight parrotfish princess parrotfish ocean surgeonfish blue tang striped parrotfish redband parrotfish queen parrotfish redfin parrotfish yellowtail damsel dusky damsel doctorfish threespot damsel Beaugregory cocoa damsel orangespotted filefish Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Invertivores bluestriped grunt yellow goatfish Spanish hogfish porkfish spotted goatfish French grunt blackbar soldierfish yellowhead wrasse Caesar grunt saucereye porgy striped grunt puddingwife spotted drum smallmouth grunt fairy basselet dusky squirrelfish slippery dick harlequin bass shy hamlet yellowtail hamlet butter hamlet clown wrasse Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Planktivores blue chromis creole wrasse bicolor damsel brown chromis Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Piscivores schoolmaster trumpetfish sand diver graysby bar jack yellowmouth grouper black hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 SITE SUMMARIES 255 SEAHORSE COTTAGE SHOAL Descrip(on. The Seahorse Cottage Shoal site is a large patch reef surrounded by sand and rhodolith in depths of 17 – 23m. The isolated reef is flat topped and dominated by Orbicella spp.. Seahorse has been monitored since 2003, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. A ciguatera study with monthly sampling has been ongoing since 2009. Outstanding Feature. Seahorse supports a diverse and abundant coral and fish community adjacent to the St. Thomas East End Reserves. Threats. Seahorse is buffered from land-‐based sources of pollution. The site is a targeted site in the St. Thomas trap fishery and trap strings have been observed over and adjacent to the site. Figure 157. Seahorse Cottage Shoal. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. SEAHORSE COTTAGE SHOAL 256 Figure 158. Seahorse benthic temperature record (21m depth). Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Currents have not been directly measured at Seahorse Cottage Shoal. Unidirectional benthic currents tend to be slow and wave-‐driven oscillatory currents only occur during heavy storm activity. Temperature. Benthic temperatures are moderate to high during warming events. J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2005 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 257 Benthic Community. The coral community of the Seahorse site is dominated by the boulder star coral (Orbicella spp.), but hosts a high diversity of other coral species. The site lost 46.6% of its cover in the 2005 bleaching event and had only regained 4.7% of this loss by 2011. Gorgonians and sponges are also common components of the sessile epibenthic animal community. The algal community is co-‐dominated by epilithic algae and the macroalgae Lobophora variegata and Dictyota spp.. Coral Health. The coral community bleached severely in the 2005 bleaching event with nearly 100% of corals bleaching over about 100% of their surface. Bleaching prevalence after 2005 was slow to decline due to delayed recovery in large Orbicella spp. colonies. The site also had a high prevalence of bleaching in the 2010 event, but at a low extent on colonies. Bleaching was also moderately prevalent in 2011. Coral diseases are common and diverse at Seahorse. White disease was also prevalent in 2004, which is rare for a site at this depth. Dark spots disease is also ubiquitous. Old partial mortality increased to a very high prevalence after the 2005 bleaching event, but had declined by 2011. Figure 159. Seahorse Cottage Shoal. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. SEAHORSE COTTAGE SHOAL 258 Figure 160. Seahorse Cottage Shoal benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 259 Fish Community. Seahorse Cottage Shoal supports a large variety of reef fish and hosts spawning aggregations of gray snapper and lane snapper during the summer months. The trophic guilds on the offshore reef are split relatively evenly between herbivores, invertivores, and piscivores. This reflects the heterogeneity of reef substrates and the availability of unconsolidated sand and rhodolith habitat surrounding the reef. Mutton snapper and queen triggerfish are relatively common. Adult stoplight and redband parrotfish dominate herbivores, although most of the larger parrotfish species do occur, including the juvenile phase. Glasseye snapper and graysby dominate piscivores. Large groupers have never been seen on the reef. Seahorse Cottage Shoal is well known to fishermen and fairly heavily fished. Traps on the reef are common during surveys. However, schoolmaster, lane, gray and mahogany snapper are all common. This may reflect the proximity to nursery habitats in the St. Thomas East End Reserves and the mangrove habitats therein. Planktivores are limited nearly entirely to yellowtail snapper. SEAHORSE COTTAGE SHOAL 260 Figure 161. The Seahorse Cottage Shoal fish community by absolute and relative biomass. Herbivores stoplight parrotfish redband parrotfish striped parrotfish princess parrotfish orangespotted filefish queen parrotfish doctorfish blue tang yellowtail damsel threespot damsel redfin parrotfish ocean surgeonfish Beaugregory dusky damsel greenblotch parrotfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 Invertivores queen trigger sailors choice tomtate French grunt blackbar soldierfish yellow goatfish yellowhead wrasse Spanish hogfish red hind bluestriped grunt squirrelfish shy hamlet clown wrasse harlequin bass yellowbelly hamlet spotted goatfish butter hamlet fairy basselet striped grunt slippery dick Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Planktivores creole wrasse blue chromis bicolor damsel yellowtail snapper brown chromis tobaccofish Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Piscivores blue runner bar jack glasseye snapper mahogany snapper schoolmaster graysby gray snapper sand diver trumpetfish spotted moray red lionfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 SITE SUMMARIES 261 SOUTH CAPELLA Descrip(on. The South Capella site is located on a rise of the St. Thomas-‐St. John midshelf reef complex in depths of 16 -‐ 25 m. The reef is made of rolling ridges of coral and pavement interspersed with sand grooves. South Capella has been monitored since 2003, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. The South Capella site is part of an outstanding shallow water midshelf reef system that is essential fish habitat. Threats. The St. Thomas trap fishery heavily targets South Capella. Active and derelict trap strings crisscross the site and a derelict trap appeared in permanent transect 1 in 2008 and has been degrading there since. The trap was still fully intact as of 2012 but open to fish passage. The reef was also highly affected by the 2005 coral bleaching event, suggesting a susceptibility to rising sea surface temperatures. Figure 162. South Capella. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. SOUTH CAPELLA 262 Figure 163. South Capella benthic temperature record (24m depth). Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Currents have not yet been directly measured at South Capella. Wave-‐driven oscillatory currents have not been experienced but are likely during swells and storms. Unidirectional benthic currents are usually weak, but strong currents can develop from the surface to midwater. Temperature. South Capella has relatively cool benthic temperatures for a shallow site during warm years, which may be a reflection of its moderately deep depth and proximity to deep water to the south. J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 263 Benthic Community. Boulder star corals (Orbicella spp.) dominate the coral community at South Capella. These corals were very heavily affected by mortality due to the 2005 coral bleaching event. The site lost 56.4% of its cover and had not regained any cover by 2011 (-‐ 3.7% recovery). Gorgonians and sponges are also common components of the sessile epibenthic animal community. The macroalga Lobophora variegata dominates the algal community, with epilithic algae and Dictyota spp. comprising the second largest shares. There was also a high abundance of crustose coralline algae and filamentous cyanobacteria. Coral Health. Corals were moderately-‐heavily affected by the 2005 bleaching event, with a prevalence of 80%, but an extent on colonies of only about 50%. Bleaching prevalence also increased during the 2010 bleaching event, but at a low extent. Bleaching is moderately prevalent at this site even in years without notable thermal stress. Coral diseases are common and diverse at South Capella. White disease was prevalent after the 2005 bleaching event in 2006, and then again in 2009 and 2011. Black band disease was found in 2002, which is unusual for a site at these depths. Dark spots disease was also typically present in most years. Old partial mortality increased after the 2005 bleaching event and has declined to 2011. Recent partial mortality was prevalent in most years of monitoring, particularly in 2006. In years not following thermal stress the highest identifiable source of recent partial mortality was biting from territorial damselfish (Stegastes spp.). Figure 164. South Capella. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. SOUTH CAPELLA 264 Figure 165. South Capella benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 265 Fish Community. South Capella is characterized by a fairly diverse fish community that is fairly well split between trophic levels. In 2011 a large school of schoolmaster snapper skewed this balance toward piscivores; however, this was probably a spawning event, and not typical of the daily fish community. The reef is spur and groove with complex reef edges and sand channels that support a large number of invertivores and variety of omnivores. Planktivores are limited nearly entirely to yellowtail snapper. Herbivores are dominated in biomass by stoplight parrotfish and black durgeon. The South Capella reef is highly fished and traps are commonly seen during our survey events. The complex reef is noticeably bare of large snappers and groupers. Lionfish are more common than on other sites. SOUTH CAPELLA 266 Figure 166. The South Capella fish community by absolute and relative biomass. Herbivores striped parrotfish princess parrotfish stoplight parrotfish doctorfish redband parrotfish blue tang ocean surgeonfish redfin parrotfish queen parrotfish yellowtail damsel Beaugregory threespot damsel Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Invertivores saucereye porgy queen trigger red hind spotted goatfish tomtate French grunt yellowhead wrasse longsnout butterflyfish fairy basselet harlequin bass Spanish hogfish yellowbelly hamlet yellowtail hamlet striped grunt clown wrasse Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Planktivores blue chromis bicolor damsel brown chromis creole wrasse yellowtail snapper chalk bass tobaccofish Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Piscivores graysby great barracuda bar jack trumpetfish gray snapper green moray black hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SITE SUMMARIES 267 SOUTH WATER Descrip(on. South Water is a hardbottom coral community along the sharp break of a midshelf reef complex in depths of 17 – 28 m. The reef has a sharp break in slope leading to a steep escarpment that terminates in a sand/sediment plain at the reef base. South Water has been monitored since 2005, with permanent benthic transects installed in 2007. Outstanding Feature. South Water is a commercially important fishing ground for reef fishes and spiny lobster. Threats. South Water is primarily threatened by fishing and strings of fish and lobster traps are common over the site. Figure 167.South Water. (top) Location. (right) A representative photo of the reef. SOUTH WATER 268 Figure 168. South Water benthic temperature record (24m depth) Physical Characteris.cs. Current. Current measurements have not been taken at the South Water site. Unidirectional benthic currents can be moderate on the hardbottom reef top and strong from the surface to midwater. Wave-‐driven oscillatory currents are likely to be felt on the reef top during swells and storms. Temperature. South Water has relatively moderate temperatures compared with other shallow water sites during warm years. This may be due to the deeper depths of the site and the proximity of deep water. J F M A M J J A S O N D 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2006 2009 2007 2010 2008 2011 Temperature ( oC) Month SITE SUMMARIES 269 Benthic Community. The sparse coral community at South Water is very diverse. Coral cover increased by 21.3% over the 2005 bleaching event and had increased by 42.6% between 2005 and 2011. However, permanent transects were not installed until 2007 and the low coral cover means that small variations in detection of corals can lead to large apparent year-‐to-‐year differences in cover. Sponges and gorgonians dominate the sessile epibenthic animal community. The algal community is nearly equally divided between Lobophora variegata, Dictyota spp., and epilithic algae. Crustose coralline algae and filamentous cyanobacteria are also very common. Coral Health. Corals were severely affected by the 2005 coral bleaching event, with over 80% of corals bleaching over nearly the entire coral surface. Corals were moderately affected in the 2010 bleaching event, with just less than 50% of corals bleaching at a low extent. Bleaching tends to be moderately prevalent even in non-‐thermal stress years. Coral diseases are not common, although there is a trend of increasing dark spots disease. Old partial mortality increased in prevalence after the 2005 bleaching event, but at a lower prevalence than most other sites. Recent partial mortality is rare. Figure 169. South Water. (left) Relative composition of the sessile epibenthic animal community. (right) Relative composition of the algal community and unconsolidated sediment. SOUTH WATER 270 Figure 170. South Water benthic cover and coral health through time (mean ±SE). Benthic Community Cover 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Coral Cyanobacteria Epilithic Algae Macroalgae Bleaching Prevalence/Extent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Prevalence Extent Disease Prevalence 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% All disease Black Band Lesion Dark Spots Intercostal White Disease Yellow Band Unknown Partial Mortality 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 BL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prevalence 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Old Recent SITE SUMMARIES 271 Fish Community. South Water Island is a low lying reef with hard bottom that supports primarily invertivores. Fish biomass is lower on this site than other offshore St. Thomas sites. Invertivore biomass is dominated by queen trigger and red hind. Mutton snapper are occasional. Stoplight and princess parrotfish dominate herbivores, and many juvenile and sub-‐adults of these species occur on the site. Piscivores make up only 5% of the biomass on the South Water Island site, and is primarily composed of the graysby. South Water Island is highly fished and traps are commonly seen during our survey events. Except for mutton snapper, the reef is bare of large snappers and groupers. Lionfish (Pterois volitans) are more common on this site. SOUTH WATER 272 Figure 171. The South Water fish community by absolute and relative biomass. Herbivores stoplight parrotfish yellowtail damsel queen parrotfish redband parrotfish redfin parrotfish striped parrotfish threespot damsel dusky damsel blue tang Beaugregory princess parrotfish ocean surgeonfish doctorfish redlip blenny Fish Biomass (g) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 Invertivores smallmouth grunt red hind French grunt yellowhead wrasse tomtate spotted drum striped grunt spotted goatfish dusky squirrelfish fairy basselet harlequin bass butter hamlet yellowtail hamlet clown wrasse puddingwife Spanish hogfish Fish Biomass (g) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Planktivores brown chromis yellowtail snapper blue chromis creole wrasse bicolor damsel chalk bass Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Piscivores dog snapper great barracuda bar jack trumpetfish spotted moray glasseye snapper graysby black hamlet Fish Biomass (g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 LITERATURE CITED 273 Literature Cited Acevedo R, Morelock J (1988) Effects of terrigenous sediment influx on coral zonation in southwestern Puerto Rico. Proceedings of the Sixth International Coral Reef Symposium 2:189-‐194 Albins M, Hixon M (2011) Worst case scenario: potential long-‐term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-‐reef communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes:1-‐7 Anderson D, Macdonald L (1998) Modelling road surface sediment production using a vector geographic information system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23:95-‐107 Armstrong R, Singh H, Torres J (2002) Benthic survey of insular slope coral reefs using the Seabed AUV. Backscatter 13:22-‐25 Armstrong RA (2007) Deep zooxanthellate coral reefs of the Puerto Rico: US Virgin Islands insular platform. Coral Reefs 26:945 Armstrong RA, Singh H, Torres J, Nemeth RS, Can A, Roman C, Eustice R, Riggs L, Garcia-‐Moliner G (2006) Characterizing the deep insular shelf coral reef habitat of the Hind Bank marine conservation district (US Virgin Islands) using the Seabed autonomous underwater vehicle. Continental Shelf Research 26:194-‐205 Betancur-‐R R, Hines A, Acero P A, Ortí G, Wilbur AE, Freshwater DW (2011) Reconstructing the lionfish invasion: insights into Greater Caribbean biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 38:1281-‐1293 Brooks GR, Devine B, Larson RA, Rood BP (2007) Sedimentary development of Coral Bay, St. John, USVI: a shift from natural to anthropogenic influences. Caribbean Journal of Science 43:226-‐243 Bruckner AW (2007) Field Guide to Western Atlantic Coral Diseases and Other Causes of Coral Mortality. NOAA, UNEP-‐WCMC, PADI Calnan J, Smith T, Nemeth R, Kadison E, Blondeau J (2008) Coral disease prevalence and host susceptibility on mid-‐depth and deep reefs in the US Virgin Islands. Revista Biologia Tropical 56 (suppl. 1):223-‐224 Cote IM, Maljkovic A (2010) Predation rates of Indo-‐Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 404:219-‐225 Eakin CM, Morgan JA, Heron SF, Smith TB, Liu G, Alvarez-‐Filip L, Baca B, Bartels E, Bastidas C, Bouchon C, Brandt M, Bruckner AW, Bunkley-‐Williams L, Cameron A, Causey BD, Chiappone M, Christensen TRL, Crabbe MJC, Day O, de la Guardia E, Díaz-‐Pulido G, DiResta D, Gil-‐Agudelo DL, Gilliam DS, Ginsburg RN, Gore S, Guzmán HM, Hendee JC, Hernández-‐Delgado EA, Husain E, Jeffrey CFG, Jones RJ, Jordán-‐ Dahlgren E, Kaufman LS, Kline DI, Kramer PA, Lang JC, Lirman D, Mallela J, Manfrino C, Maréchal J-‐P, Marks K, Mihaly J, Miller WJ, Mueller EM, Muller EM, Orozco Toro CA, Oxenford HA, Ponce-‐Taylor D, Quinn N, Ritchie KB, Rodríguez S, Ramírez AR, Romano S, Samhouri JF, Sánchez JA, Schmahl GP, Shank BV, Skirving WJ, Steiner SCC, Villamizar E, Walsh SM, Walter C, Weil E, Williams EH, Roberson KW, Yusuf Y (2010) Caribbean Corals in Crisis: Record Thermal Stress, Bleaching, and Mortality in 2005. PLoS ONE 5:e13969 Edmunds PJ, Witman JD (1991) Effect of Hurricane Hugo on the primary framework of a reef along the south shore of St. John, US Virgin Islands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 78:201-‐204 Fabricius K (2005) Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:125-‐146 Fong P, Paul VJ (2011) Coral Reef Algae. In: Dubinsky Z, Stambler N (eds) Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition. Springer Science, pp241-‐272 Fong P, Smith TB, Wartian MJ (2006) Epiphytic cyanobacteria maintain shifts to macroalgal dominance on coral reefs following ENSO disturbance. Ecology 87:1162-‐1168 Foundation REE (2012) Volunteer Fish Survey Project Database Ginsburg RN (2007) Mesophotic coral reefs (30-‐100m) are the frontier of reef exploration and research 33rd Scientific Meeting of the Association of the Marine Labs of the Caribbean, St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands A26 LITERATURE CITED 274 Gladfelter WB (1982) White-‐band disease in Acropora palmata -‐ implications for the structure of shallow reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 32:639-‐643 Gray SC, Gobbi KL, Narwold PV (2008) Comparison of sedimentation in bays and reefs below developed versus undeveloped watersheds on St. John, US Virgin Islands. Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium 1:345-‐349 Green SJ, Akins JL, Côté IM (2011) Foraging behaviour and prey consumption in the Indo-‐Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433:159-‐167 Hatcher BG (1984) A maritime accident provides evidence for alternate stable states in benthic communities on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 3:199-‐204 Hatcher BG, Larkum AWD (1983) An experimental analysis of factors controlling the standing crop of the epilithic algal community on a coral reef. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 69:61-‐ 84 Herzlieb S, Kadison E, Blondeau J, Nemeth RS (2005) Comparative assessment of coral reef systems located along the insular platform south of St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands and the relative effects of natural and human impacts. Proc 10th Int Coral Reef Symp 4-‐2:1144-‐1151 Hinderstein L, Marr J, Martinez F, Dowgiallo M, Puglise K, Pyle R, Zawada D, Appeldoorn R (2010) Theme section on mesophotic coral Ecosystems: Characterization, Ecology, and Management. Coral Reefs 29:247-‐251 Jackson A, Semmens BX, Sadovy Y, Nemeth RS, Heppell S, Chapman R, Aguilar-‐Perera A, Claydon J, Calosso M, Sealey K, Sharer M, Bernardi G (2014) Population structure and phylogeography in Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus), a mass-‐aggregating marine fish. PLoS ONE in press Kadison E, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Smith TB, Calnan JM (2010) Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus) in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, with evidence for a spawning aggregation site recovery. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 62:273-‐279 Kohler K, Gill SM (2006) Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): A Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers and Geosciences 32:1259-‐1269 Kramer P, Lang J, Marks K, Garza-‐Perez R, Ginsburg R (2005) AGRRA Methodology, version 4.0, June 2005. University of Miami, Miami Kuffner I, B., Walters L, J., Becerro M, A., Paul V, J., Ritson-‐Williams V, J., Beach K, S. (2006) Inhibition of coral recruitment by macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Marine Ecology Progress Series 323:107-‐117 Manzello DP, Brandt ME, Smith TB, Lirman D, Hendee JC, Nemeth RS (2007) Hurricanes benefit bleached corals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104:12035-‐12039 Menza C, Kendall M, Hile S (2008) The deeper we go the less we know. Revista Biologia Tropical 56:11-‐24 Menza C, Kendall M, Rogers C, Miller J (2007) A deep reef in deep trouble. Continental Shelf Research 27:2224-‐2230 Miller J, Muller E, Rogers C, Waara R, Atkinson A, Whelan K, Patterson M, Witcher B (2009) Coral disease following massive bleaching in 2005 causes 60% decline in coral cover on reefs in the US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 28:925-‐937 Morris JAJ, Whitfield PE (2009) Biology, ecology, control and management of the Invasive Indo-‐Pacific Lionfish: An Updated Integrated Assessment. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington D.C., NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 9 Mumby PJ (2006) The impact of exploiting grazers (Scaridae) on the dynamics of Caribbean coral reefs. Ecological Applications 16:747-‐769 Mumby PJ, Harborne AR (2010) Marine Reserves Enhance the Recovery of Corals on Caribbean Reefs. PLoS ONE 5:e8657 Mumby PJ, Dahlgren CP, Harborne AR, Kappel CV, Micheli F, Brumbaugh DR, Holmes KE, Mendes JM, Broad K, Sanchirico JN, Buch K, Box S, Stoffle RW, Gill AB (2006) Fishing, trophic cascades, and the process of grazing on coral reefs. Science 311:98-‐101 Nemeth RS (2005) Population characteristics of a recovering US Virgin Islands red hind spawning aggregation following protection. Marine Ecology Progress Series 286:81-‐97 LITERATURE CITED 275 Nemeth RS, Sladeck Nowlis J (2001) Monitoring the effects of land development on the near-‐shore reef environment of St. Thomas, USVI. Bulletin of Marine Science 69:759-‐775 Nemeth RS, Smith TB, Blondeau J, Kadison E, Calnan JM, Gass J (2008) Characterization of deep water reef communities within the marine conservation district, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Submitted to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council. University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas 90 + appendices NOAA (2006) Tropical Ocean Coral Bleaching Indices, Silver Springs, Maryland, NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD; 26 January 2007. Available from: http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/PSB/EPS/CB_indices/coral_bleaching_indices.html NOAA (2012) US Virgin Island's Degree Heating Weeks plots. http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/cb/time_series/all_USVirgin.txt Pastorok R, Bilyard G (1985) Effects of sewage pollution on coral-‐reef communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21:175-‐189 Ramos-‐Scharrón CE, MacDonald LH (2007a) Runoff and suspended sediment yields from an unpaved road segment, St John, US Virgin Islands. Hydrological Processes 21:35-‐50 Ramos-‐Scharrón CE, MacDonald LH (2007b) Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Catena 71:250-‐266 Randall JE (1963) An analysis of the reef fish populations of artificial and natural reefs in the Virgin Islands. Caribbean Journal of Marine Science 3:31-‐47 Robertson A, Garcia A, Quintana H, Smith T, II B, Reale-‐Munroe K, Gulli J, Olsen D, Hooe-‐Rollman J, Jester E, Klimek B, Plakas S (2013) Invasive Lionfish (Pterois volitans): A Potential Human Health Threat for Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in Tropical Waters. Marine Drugs 12:88-‐97 Rogers C, Garrison V (2001) Ten years after the crime: lasting effects of damage from a cruise ship anchor on a coral reef in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands Bulletin of Marine Science 69:793-‐803 Rogers CS (1982) The Marine Environments of Brewers Bay, Perserverence Bay, Flat Cay and Saba Island, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I., with Emphasis on Coral Reefs and Seagrass Beds, November 1978-‐July 1981 181 Rogers CS (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62:185-‐202 Rogers CS, McLain LN, Tobias CR (1991) Effects of Hurricane Hugo (1989) on a coral reef in St. John USVI. Marine Ecology Progress Series 78:189-‐199 Rothenberger J, Blondeau J, Cox C, Curtis S, Fisher B, Garrison G, Hillis-‐Starr Z, Jeffrey C, Kadison E, Lundgren I, Miller W, Muller E, Nemeth RS, Paterson S, Rogers CS, Smith TB, Spitzack A, Taylor M, Toller W, Wright J, Wusinich-‐Mendez D (2008) The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the U.S. Virgin Islands. In: Waddell JE, Clarke AM (eds) The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2008. NOAA Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment’s Biogeography Team, Silver Spring, MD, pp567 Schofield PJ (2009) Geographic extent and chronology of the invasion of non-‐native lionfish (Pterois volitans [Linnaeus 1758] and P. miles [Bennett 1828]) in the Western North Atlantic and Caribbean Sea. Aquatic Invasions 4:473-‐479 Smith TB, Fong P, Kennison R, Smith J (2010a) Spatial refuges and associational defenses promote harmful blooms of the alga Caulerpa sertularioides onto coral reefs. Oecologia 164:1039-‐1048 Smith TB, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Calnan JM, Kadison E, Herzlieb S (2008) Assessing coral reef health across onshore to offshore stress gradients in the US Virgin Islands. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56:1983-‐1991 Smith TB, Blondeau J, Nemeth RS, Pittman SJ, Calnan JM, Kadison E, Gass J (2010b) Benthic structure and cryptic mortality in a Caribbean mesophotic coral reef bank system, the Hind Bank Marine Conservation District, U.S. Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 29:289-‐308 Smith TB, Brandt ME, Calnan JM, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Kadison E, Taylor M, Rothenberger JP (2013) Convergent mortality responses of Caribbean coral species to seawater warming. Ecosphere 4:art87 Strand J, Jørgensen A, Tairova Z (2009) TBT pollution and effects in molluscs at US Virgin Islands, Caribbean Sea. Environment International 35:707-‐711 LITERATURE CITED 276 Tobias W (1997) Three Year Summary Report: Cooperative Fisheries Statistics Program #SF-‐42 (NA27FT0301-‐01). Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States Virgin Islands 41 pp Williams ID, Polunin NVC, Hendrick VJ (2001) Limits to grazing by herbivorous fishes and the impact of low coral cover on macroalgal abundance on a coral reef in Belize. Marine Ecology Progress Series 222:187-‐196 Woody K, Atkinson A, Clark R, Jeffrey C, Lundgren I, Miller J, Monaco M, Muller E, Patterson M, Rogers C, Smith TB, Spitzack T, Waara R, Whelan K, Witcher B, Wright A (2008) Coral Bleaching in the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2005 and 2006. In: Wilkinson C, Souter D (eds) Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs After Bleaching and Hurricanes in 2005. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, and Reef and Rainforest Research Center, Townsville, pp152