Byas , Dee Dee v. Legislature of The Virgin Islands
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN DEE DEE BYAS, Plaintiff, v. LEGISLATURE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, and USIE RICHARDS, in both his official and personal capacities, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2006-238 ATTORNEYS: Karin A. Bentz, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff. Jeffrey B. Moorehead, Esq. St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the defendants. Claudette V. Ferron, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the defendants. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. On November 24, 2008, the defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment.1 On December 1, 2008, the defendants filed a memorandum of law in support of their November 24, 2008, motion for partial summary judgment. 1 The November 24, 2008, motion was unaccompanied by a memorandum of law. Case: 3:06-cv-00238-CVG-GWB Document #: 84 Filed: 12/17/08 Page 1 of 2 Byas v. Legislature of the V.I., et al. Civil No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_06-cv-00238/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_06-cv-00238-0.pdf
SHA-256 2e926730cce8e354e754d463b67ee4362adc57284c2eeddbcc5cddf25a06351e
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-2e926730cce8
Document text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN DEE DEE BYAS, Plaintiff, v. LEGISLATURE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, and USIE RICHARDS, in both his official and personal capacities, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2006-238 ATTORNEYS: Karin A. Bentz, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff. Jeffrey B. Moorehead, Esq. St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the defendants. Claudette V. Ferron, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the defendants. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. On November 24, 2008, the defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment.1 On December 1, 2008, the defendants filed a memorandum of law in support of their November 24, 2008, motion for partial summary judgment. 1 The November 24, 2008, motion was unaccompanied by a memorandum of law. Case: 3:06-cv-00238-CVG-GWB Document #: 84 Filed: 12/17/08 Page 1 of 2 Byas v. Legislature of the V.I., et al. Civil No. 2006-238 Order Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(d) provides that “no document filed with the Court shall exceed twenty (20) pages without leave of Court.” LRCi 7.1(d). The defendants’ motion is twenty-four pages long, excluding exhibits. The record does not reflect that the defendants sought, or were granted, leave of court to file a motion in excess of twenty pages. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 56.1(a)(1) provides, in part, that summary judgment motions shall be accompanied by “a separate statement of the material facts about which the movant contends there is no genuine issue.” LRCi 56.1(a)(1). That rule also provides that “[e]ach fact paragraph shall be serially numbered and shall be supported by specific citation to the record.” Id. The defendants’ motion neither includes nor is accompanied by a separate statement of material facts. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ Chief Judge Case: 3:06-cv-00238-CVG-GWB Document #: 84 Filed: 12/17/08 Page 2 of 2