Ramos v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PRECILLA RAMOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 2013-0073 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________________ ) Attorneys: Precilla Ramos, pro se St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Plaintiff Angela Tyson-Floyd, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant United States of America’s “Motion to Dismiss Petition for Return of Seized Property” (Dkt. No. 10), the entire record herein, and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. Date: March 26, 2015 ________/s/_______ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:13-cv-00073-WAL-GWC Document #: 13 Filed: 03/26/15 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_13-cv-00073/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_13-cv-00073-1.pdf
SHA-256 34f4d1d0ab000553e3db5b2f3b28a99deb2e68d5161f877f60a158d74a9f1680
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-34f4d1d0ab00
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PRECILLA RAMOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 2013-0073 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________________ ) Attorneys: Precilla Ramos, pro se St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Plaintiff Angela Tyson-Floyd, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant United States of America’s “Motion to Dismiss Petition for Return of Seized Property” (Dkt. No. 10), the entire record herein, and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. Date: March 26, 2015 ________/s/_______ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:13-cv-00073-WAL-GWC Document #: 13 Filed: 03/26/15 Page 1 of 1