USVI Public Records

Document text

SDMS Document 115564 GIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS DRAFT DATA SUMMARY REPORT VOLUME II OF II Prepared For Island Chemical Companyj Inc. By Harding Lawson Associates Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 15, 1995 3 02 887 • > Tl m z g X m 302888 APPENDIX E Data Validation - February 1995 Groundwater Sampling 302889 OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Project Number: Jason Schindler HLA, Philadelphia Mike Phillips ^ ^ ^ HLA, Denver April 14, 1995 Island Chemical Company Remedial Investigation Data Validation 29872 10.2 The completed data validation reports for the soil and water samples collected in January and February 1995, as part of the Island Chemical Company Remedial Investigation are enclosed. We will retain copies of the data validation reports for this project as well EIS the data packages themselves. If you have any questions regarding these reports, please call me at (303] 293-6052. MPP/jr SchindOl.mem Enclosures cc: Brian D. LaFlamme - HLA, Denver Island Chemical Company Project File Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environnnental Services 707 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2400 Denver, CO 80202 - (303) 292-5365 302890 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis (LOW CONcE|v/tR/\Tl0N) Case Number: ^ ^ 0 2 - Z - ProjectNumben 2 ^ 8 1 2 . , 1 O - 2 - Contractor Laboratory: P t t , ^ . J A ^ A V V A V W , ^ ^ Validator .r Laboratory: P/^CLg: ^ J L v 1 ^ . < ^ ^ y p ^ ^ t P ^ • C\.AjnJJd^ ^ Validation Date: ^ f ^ o l ^ S ' QC Reviewer. '^'C^^^^^oC^ -^ ^ / - M ^ Review Date: ^ / ' l / f s Sample Matrix: UJ odX^- ( O , Q<^ 0 ^ Analytical Metho± g p / ^ C L F i ^ . r / V < L ^ i ; u d i , . r > ^ /9/L^/)/ytW 5 g l ^ Sample Designations: lYllVoool mujooo^ VYHAJnoo^- VvA^) < ^ f s n ^ yY\u}0)oi CB&Uin^. T&O^lM- Tg02 L Data for the above samples are Acceptable for use X Acceptable for use as qualified Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Bfeject Manager? Yes ( No) Conunents: X^Q^Oo^ J^/i'l^JL J U O ^ K X J J - ^ ^ ^ - ^ .XS>^^^ \ l ^ ^ ? f \ (j&^^dlyv^'-tk' vCM_l.doc I01419»« 1032 Fonn VOA 1.0 302891 DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST X Included, no problems * Included, problems O Not included NA Not applicable Quality Control Summary >^ Case Narrative X Surrogate Recovery Sumjnary X MS/MSD Summary TK" Reagent Blank Summary X GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary _. ,X Laborot+ory Cow+rol Sampk SUWIW^YY Sample Data •jr* Chain of Custody Forms y Holding Times •jj^ Organic Analysis Data Sheets y Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data - ^ Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data jl^ Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X" Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data X BFB Mass Spectra yf Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X BFB Mass Listings voa_I.dDC 10141994 1032 Form VOA 1.0 3 0 2 8 9 2 Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data Y Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Comments: FOOT VOA Ml voJ_l.doc 101419941032 3 3 0 2 8 9 3 Harding Lawson Associates • - . • _ ; Engineering and ' ~ ' ~ : , 1 Environmental Services SHEET OF PROJECT. SUBJECT SU^ifiAxdl C!ht^jc0A. Cjgyy^AUA^. JOB NO. DATE 3/^oh^ COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY AjnM/o, l^g^t^wyXe J^u/m^vYVAAMj rJlut^voh r p ynwooo] YAW 0003 \Ayoooo^ mwooo^ mvJO\o\ 23&v)oz T30Z\ + TBOZ\(p V^AVJ003 VJP(/^00\ \j<JAMOZ. VJAAoo(p V)Ay^oo(^ ] 3 ^ 302894 SPECmC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved aiid>received in good condiuon? Yes ( N O J Were custody ffansfers consethf and completely documented? /Yes) No Comments: X ^ g ^ O . * ^ t e W W t e r ^ . f W e V ^ ; ^ ^ , ; 4 ^ ^ ^ 4 - t V Y V V ^ ^ (X^«^e^Jujcte^fi-J^4AA>C^^ xlMAAj^^cfce^; R^sojozo^qi^. Holding Times Were sample analyses performed within holding limes'? Yesl No Comments: J ^ O i / y v y J l e ^ Ju&^-\JL (Xy^yjoXKM-^oJL . O ^ M M M ^ V ^ /CKS^^^AA^- Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? r Y ^ No Were samples analyzed wttfiirv the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? (YCSJ No Comments: )V^ Fonn VOA 1.0 voj_l.doc 10141994 1032 4 302895 Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibraDpn*-^ ^YesJ No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes Did the initial calibration meet th^-flrin^mum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? Yes 0 le-flTJnmii Comments: ^>^€A><.WJI dcrYy^^Ot^U^JU^ - X e j J U J i % y y ^ u k ' yVU^Wi/f^w-VY*^ Q C j / m K - ^ t ^ y C t W ^ ^4^Vv^vp£M- . KJLL.e^ J ^ HP'^H^ ' ^ " 1 ^ ^ y^uymrmM Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibration curyes-^neet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes r ^ o ) Did the continuing calibration me^t-th^minimum RRF criteria? Yes r No Comments: 6/vAA^J^-|^^C.^dA>V^ ^{.^>'aA ^ U - d i ^ ^ \ ^ (^^ ^'(Xe J l r t b < y ^ ^ ^\%Ji- C^n^Jt^AAAJU^vuj. cU:L£iJ^-aWv^ ^^j^^J-'m/yriAAu --JEVL J^:^C?^ Fonn VOA IJ) voa_l.doc ^___^ 10141994 1032 5 / ~ ^ i 302896 Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike reeoveries within acceptance limits? rYes) No If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, wera the samples reanalyzed? Yes No (NAJ Conunents: )/Ul^ Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample dejiverysgroup (SDG)? (^Yes ) No Were the matrix spike recpveri^ and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? (Yes J No Comments: M ^ / y v i S P a/^v«LA4a<^JOvM>^ - t W - J o A / m ^ n ^ M ^ - ^ ' ^ ' ^ f ^ Internal Standards Were the internal standard,jreas and retention times within tITe required limits? (Yes) No If the internal standard requirements were npt-met. were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No / N A ) Comments: \mw Fotm VOA 1.0 voa_l.doc 1014199410J2 6 / ' ^ 30289-7 .".jj-.a^tar**. ^••i • Blank Analyses Were the appropriate numbef-of blank analyses performed? Q ^ No Were analytes detected iiv^hevblanks? (Ves} No If analytes were detected in-ihe blanks, were the same analytes detected in the associated investigative samples? r V e ^ No NA Did the sample results reQu»©NQualificaaon due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? fYesl No Comments: X ^ A > ^ / U > ^ Cer^^'W^-^A^'vd^ J A A ^ ^ J L QMjJ^iyUz^ GTV^ ^ ^ Z -^^f''^''^ ^ (hdoijx^Js}A>^^^ COAArn^ ( S } A ^ < J ^ ^ aJ: 5x>k< Laboratory Control Samples ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I T ^ ^ j4^MVvvna^ ( ^ o M M i a i ^ Were laboratory control s^japle (LCS) analyses performed at the correct frequency? /^eV) No NA Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? /YesJ No NA Comments: yir^^^ vol _l.doc 10141994 1032 Form VOA 3 0 2 8 9 8 Sample Results Were target analytes repoTOdJn the investigative samples? (Yes) No Were mass spectra provided-for the target analytes detected in the investigative samples? (Yes) No Were the mass spectra of aee^ptable quality and analytes correcUy identified? (YesJ No Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (Rja^ acceptable? /Ves} No Comments: ^ ( W ^ ^ ^ d b u ^ \ n \ ^ 0 0 O \ O W ? y n ^ C l d ? ! J X i ^ ^ ^ S S ^ d : ^ J ^ y Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identifiedjsenjpound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? ( Y e s j No NA Were non-target peaks evaluatfid as required? Yes j No Were the TIC mass specttarss^ches. identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? ( j ' e s j No Comments: yVvv^^ jJb^^X^-^^A- vo«_l.doc 10141994 1032 Fonn VOA 1.0 3 0 2 8 9 9 Log Books Were sample preparations nreperly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes) No NA Were sample analyses propgilv documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? / Y e s ) No Comments: yUy^ voa_l.doc 10141994 1032 Fonn VOA 1.0 302900 Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning f ^ / Z Z / ^ ^ Relative Abundance* Initial Calibration j i f ^ \ T ^ RRF: Z-zi^z- - y i ^ l - f - j X - ^ ~ 0 . 7 4 0 - ^ C^.etr^^^:^vnv %RSD: ynxo^ (^ ^ /^f^F^ ^ X loo - %^SD Continuing Calibration | 2 / ^ z / ^ 5 ' %D: «>^F-'^«f^X,,oo = %P Sunogale Recovery YV{V)0 0O'3> f>^w-^'°^=''^-^^^ ''°'-''*°<= FonnVOAlJ) 10141994 1032 I Q 3 0 2 9 0 1 »*«" Spike Recovery IjHlA/flOOif- 115"- 1 0 8 (7 , , ^ A, /, Sample Results KVlU;(50O5'/ 1 y I - I .>a. Detected Result: TIC Result (rWvu Afefei) VQa_l.doc 10141994 1032 2 J Fonn VOA 1.0 3 0 2 9 0 2 HOLDING TIME QUALIRCATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Identification \ (al9 JUlJb^v^-^ v ^ \ Date Sampled ^4^ j M i y V t ^ W d L ^ y Date Analyzed Analysis Holding Time Qualifier 1 O to yo o Comments: voi_l,doc 10141994 1032 Form VOA 1.0 12 INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALIRCATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time \Tl3\h5- \ 1 1 Instrument f Analyte ^M^<^^ 0 4ffni^ dcii^vyjL / - UJA^JOM^rMje^ '7.'-\\j^^(ouvve^>\j. \ RF 0,0^0 0.02'i 0 . 0 ' ^ • 1 RSD Go.S 4^.^ 33.^ 37.3 Samples Affected (ncc.^n^A^fj^a^ I , f - V Qualifier 3-/- 3 " ^ J-/(? T'/R 1 1 1 1 Comments: o to O voa_I.doc 10141994 1032 13 Fo«m VOA 1.0 CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument Analyte RF %D Samples Affected Qualifier zjnl^^^m f (IMs^myy^jM^i/KZ^ ^\.1 Ya\J^O00^^ TB02I4- -JJIKT nidiilJm^cUn^ ??0'Z- Thr CLcj> ^ 0.0\'o r / R 2-8/i7ta>tw>A^ O.OM ^M- Cnh9m^Mf\Du^^^^ -3^^ T/ur i - Y)f[jliiA-2'M.dn4vm I, 4^-4- T/ur '2'-W OAfayyuG-v\I'^ 0.03] 2&.7 T/R l.Z-QtM^rryw-^' CMM h^S^^o/yJl^ 31.3 1 T/OT zjzij^^joo:: E (1/c.d^^ . 0-CI3 TBOzir^j yY)iA;or?<9g) YniAJnoo3 :rl^ Z-BiZfe/Vt-^VLg- 1?.^;?^ ^-^g/^^VU^HrC ^•(?4-2. T/R T/R. '2\2l\\^j\\^^ F B/g^j-v^^ve-v^id^LtAtx - ^ ( ^ R^^^-WOZ^mujOool^ yntJQioi T/(^r (L<LCw-Vv;e^ 0>0\^ r/R 2'BxCt5/n^e->vi2. 0-0Z2- \K i CO 1 o to 1 \ D O O l Comments: \*OB 1 .doc 101419W 1032 Fonn VOA 1.0 14 "JT^ BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID Analyte Blank Result (units) Action Level Associated Samples V^LKoi T<\s^jk<^<L M ^ ^ 0.6 s-.o J^oziij- mujnont^ -f \/gLK02. m.li:^o/np.cUm^l ILZ. (Wrtvy^i O.OCP 7.0 n3^ L \/g^K05 ^jdi^^i^^ M^l^o. A£. £JL l^u/onnl. VYHA;^l<9l,^g>&u;o n Q^l)<An(\A. ± JtO y^iXQi^ md^^^rMruifjC 10. (ySpLKpi) C/x;\ilrrn cili^vMi^ R l ML L (Odi M^^yyu^J^e^ VSSLkOI W\.!d±^^.^cK}!^;l^ z 20 Tg02i4- ]fY\ilJLf<l^c^UraJljf 10. yv]\A)ow4- T^Q2>l(p y\1>fr^l./^^e7PJ^xnA/^. . 1 ^ m\AJooo^. ^SGr\A}n'Z YTWAJOOO^, VY]\Ajr)nn\ r \Y\VJO)0\ LO O NJ VO O Coinnicnis; voj_I.doc 10141994 1032 15 Fonn VOA 1.0 Summary and Conclusions (1 lH WioJl^ gjP ni-aMlA^/^ ArtMMt^h^XJ-^^ frf-tlLe^ I iirv\r IA-^XM^^T-V- AA)-tt^ T' O w ^ CKM J f ^ I J i ^ ^ jtl/YK&a. jjj^A p, VWrX ' QC^ nMrKAjOAAr- IL^UXV^^ ,AAh€^uL A l ^ ^ ^ • ^ UfxlaAXnXL&>^ p J J r ^ d / c d y L ixy-rx^ yAPX^gA.i^hAA&Vi -H^JL ./>t1„AU^ T l U ^-^xut^v^. } M / : > ( U A A ^ ( H r iy/dteu^ Q^x^ Ci JA )/{y\^^ U^ jte. ' ^ Vh a/)A^ f (X -Au/vYVime^nM ^AA^oJ^iuA/v rJMyJP QAA.<hoCgd:]L^ .^d^/my<o ^k^K)-A,^ (yjLAL^OjiJi r^Af^i^^ rk^ - . ^ / p ^ P ./A^ ^^/TvlAMiL^ y^J '^^USUAJL dlth^fA^ yJjAMAp^.Ji^ O ^ ^ ^ A A J J ^ J I flu rUdX^ ay\p ns>n^AJU^ji,A/!iAep r\^ ruAjJbJ^jiJ. .^.lAA^Wk Validator's Signature: Validator's Initials: Validation Date: ^j^|^'5• QC Reviewer's Signature: ?^ ; ^ ^ 1 ^ QC Reviewer's Initials f^F^ Review Date: y//// 9 r - voa_l.cioc 10141994 1032 Fonn VOA \ 0 16 302907 :LLCA LOW CONC. WAT't'R VOLATILE 0RGAHT.C3 AMALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Names ETC/GULF SOUTH .at) Codes GULF Ca?ie No.: HLA Contract: SA.S No. s EPA SAMPLE WO, MWOOOl Lab SamQle IDs WAW004 Lab File ID; VOWAWO-^R Purqe Volumes 25.00 (ml) SDG Mo =; 95022 Date Received? 02/17/95 Date Analyzeds 02/22/95 D i 1 u t i on F actors -^^0 CAS NO, COnPOUND CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 7'a~a7-3 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 — — 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 "7 .;•) Q "v _^__ - • _^ _^_ __ ^^ 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 ^ ' . / . . _ . O "-'' *••% - « 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 - 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 B - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 - -5 1= ,_ -^ tr . „ -^^ ._„ .^ _^ _„ 10EJ~10-1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 - — - 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 3 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 — 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 - C h i o r ome t h a n e -Bromome thane -Vinyl Chloride -Chloroethane -Me t hylen e C h1o r1d e -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide -1^1-Dichloroethene -1,l-Dichloroethane_ -c i s-1,2-D i c hlo roe t bene -trans-1,2~Di chloroethene -Chloroform -1^2-Di chloroethane_ -2—Bu tan one — B r o ni o c; h 1 o r o m e t 'n a n e - 1 , 1 , , l - T r i c h l o r o e t h a r i e . _ •-Carbon Tetr^^cii 1 o r i d e -B romod i ch I o r ome t han 03 -1,2~Dichloropropane — c i s-1 ^ 3-D i c h lo r o p r o pen e —• T r i c h 1 o I' o e t h e n e -D i b romo chlo rome t han e —1,1,2-Trichloroethane •-Benzene — t ran =j-1 ,3~D i c h 1 oro p ro pen e •-Bromoform —4-|'lethyl~2~Pentanone —2-He X an one —Te t ra c h1o roe t hen e —1,2-Dibromoethane — 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ —Toluene — C h l o r o b e n z e n e —E t h y l b e n z en e — S t y r e n e —Xylene ( t o t a l ) „ _ 1 1 I — 1,3-D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e ? — 1 , 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e — 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e — 1., 2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n FORM I LCV Reviewed By Date 1 0 / 9 2 ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOI...ATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS • Lab Name: ."HITC/GULF SOUTH ab Code: GULF Ca?;G No.: HL_A_ Lab Sample ID: l«JAl»J004 Lab File ID: V0WAW04R Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO, I'lWCOOl SDG No.: 95022 Purqe Volume: 25..00 (ml) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/22/95 Dilution Factor: 40 Number TICs -found: 0 CAS NUMBER COi-'lPOUND NAME RT EST, CONC. (uci/L) Q FORM I LCV-TIC 302909 10/92 ILCA LOW CONC- WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ETC/GUI.F SOUTH kab Code: GULF Ca?ie Wo.s HLA Lab Sample IDs W,AW003 Lab File ID: V0WAW03 Purqe Volume: 25.00 (ml) CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.s EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0003 SDG No.: 95022 Date Received s 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) IT! 74-87-3 74-83-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35- 75-34-3— 156-59-2- 156-60-5- 67-66-3 107-06-2 78-93-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 56-23-5 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5- 79-01-6 124-48-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6- 75-25-2 108-10-1 591-78-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 103-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7— 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 96-12-8 -Chloromethane -Bromome thane - V i n y 1 C h 1 o r i d e -C h 1 o roP! t han e -Methyl€>ne Chloride -Acetone -Carbon Disu1fide -1,1-D i c h1o roe t hen e -1 ,1-Dicfiloroethane - c i s-1 ., 2~D i c h 1 o roe t hen e — — t r an s-1 -Di c h 1 o roe-t hen e -Chloroform — 1., 2-Di chloroethane —2-~Butanone -E^romoc hi orome thane -1,1., 1-Tri chlo roe thane —C^ir bon Te t ra c h 1 o r i de -E<romodi c h l o r o m e t h a n e - 1 , 2 - D i c t - i l o r o p r o p a n e — <:. i -s - 1 , 3 ~ D i c h l o r o p r o pen e • - T r i c h l c j r o e t h e n e _ -Dibromochloromethane —1,1,2-Trichloroethane --Ben zene • - 1 r a rt =•>-1,3 - D i c h 1 o r o p r- o p e ri e _ — B r o m o f o r m —4-MGithyl-2-F-'entanone — 2 ~ H e X an on e — T e t ra c h1o roe t hen e — 1 ^2-Dibromoethane — 1 ,,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_. —Tolv.iene —Chi or oben zene —Ethyl benzene —Styrene —Xylene ( t o t a l ) — 1^ 3 - D i c h l o r o b e n z en e — 1 , 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e — 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e — 1 , 2 - D i t a r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n FORM I 1 1 1 1 f^^ 42 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u u u u u u u u LJ U U U U U U u u u u u L.l u u u u u u u u u u u u LCV Reviewed By Date o to 1 0 / 9 : ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS # Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH \b Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: WAW003 Lab File ID: V0WAW03 P u- r q e V o 1 u m e: 2 5. ..0 0__ (m 1) Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAiiPLE NO. Mwooo: SDG No. : 9502.2 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: l^jO Numti'e^r TICs -found: 0 CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT ST,. CONC. ( u q / L ) Reviewed By Date . FORM I LCV-TIC 302911 10/92 ILCA LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET V.ab Ha^ne: ETC/GULF SOUTH |,ab Code: GUtJF Case No.: HLA EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Sample ID: WAAOOl Lab File ID: VOWAAOIR Purge Volume: 25.00 (ml) 1...A Contract: SAS No.: SDG Date Received: Date-? Analyzed: Dilution Factoi MW0004 No.: 95022 02/16/95 02/17/95 -: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 74-87-3 74-83-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3— 156-59-2 156-60-5—- 67-66-3 107-06-2 73-93-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 ••-•, / — . O"^.... >"•• „.. . „ „ 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5- 79-01-6 124-48-1- - 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6- 75-25-2 108-10-1 591-78-6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 — 106-93-4 79-34-5 103-33-3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 — 100-41-4 100-42-5—- 1330-20-7— 541-73-1 — 106-46-7—- 95-50-1 96-12-8 -Chioromethane -Bromome thane __ -Vinyl Chloride_ -Chloroethane -We -t hyl en e C '"il o r i d e -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide -1., 1-Dichloroethene — 1., 1 -D i c h 1 o roe t han e - c i s - 1 , 2 - D i ch1o roe then e — t r ari s - 1 , 2 - D i c h 1 o r oe t hen e -Chloroform -1 n 2-Di chlo roe thane_ -2-Butanone —Bromochidromethane 1^1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane - 1 , 2 - D i c h1o ro p ro pan e - c i s - 1 ^ 3-D i ch1o ro p ro pen e - T r i c hil o r o e t hiene_ •-D i b romo c h1o rome t han e — 1 , 1 n 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e —Benzene ^_ ~ t ran s - 1 , 3 - D i c h 1 o r o p r o pen e -Bromoform —4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —2-Hex-an one --Tetrachloroetl"iene •-1., 2-Ditaromoethane _. —1,1^2,2-Tetrachloroethane —Toluene --Chlorobenzene —Ethylbenzene —Styrene —Xylene (total) — 1,3~Dichlorobenze?ne —1,4-Dichlorobenzene —1,2-Dichlorobenzene — 1,2-Dibromo-3-~chloropropane... u T u . u ,. 1 ;u ..TV - 'y^ R 1 !U FORM I LCV Reviewed By Date _ 1 ; 1 1 ; 1 1 1 5 ; 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3. 1 1 1 l-i U ! u ; u u u M'R \ u ; u ; u T : u ; u u Li ; u ; u ; u ; u ; u uT ; ^ R ; u ; u ; u \[ u ; ;u ; u ; ; u u ; :u : u ; ;u ; UT : o to VD H to "t."tf) p 1 0 / 9 2 ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Contract ab Code: GULF Case No-: HLA SAS No- EPA SAMPLE h\0. MW0004 SDG No-: 95022 Lata Sample ID: WAAOOl Lab File ID: VOWAAOIR F'Lirqe Volume: 25.00 (ml) Date Received: 02/16/95 Date Analyzed: 02/17/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 ' Number TICs founds COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC, ( u a / L ) Q V Reviewed By Date FORM I L C V - T I C 302913 : i o / 9 : ILCA LOW CONC- WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET • Lab Name: ETC/GUI...F SOUTH ab Code: GULP Case No-s HLA Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOOO5 SDG No.: 95022 Lab Sample ID: WAW0.01_ Lab File ID: VOWAWO:i F'u rq e Volume: !!^.5...OQ..... ( m 1) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 DilL^tion Factors 1.0 CAS NO.. 74-87-3 74-83-9 75-01-4 75-00-3- 75-09-2- — 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4- 75-34-3 156-59-2—^ 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 67-66-3 — 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 73-93-3 74-97-5 — 71-55-6 56-23-5 75-27-4- - 78-87-5 -01-5- ../, COMPOUND 10061- 79-01- 124-48-1- 79-00-5— 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 — 10061-02- 75-25-2 — - 108-10-1 591-73-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 108-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7— 541-73-1 — 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 — 95-50-1 96-12-8 -Chlci rome-thane -Bromomethane - V i n y 1 C h 1 o r i d e -Chloroethane -i'let|-iy 1 ene Cfi 1 oride -Acetone -Car bon Di su1f i de -1,1-Dichloroethene -1 ^ 1 - D .i. c hi 1 o r o e t li a n e -cis-1,2-Di chloroethene ~trans"l,2-Dichloroethene -Chloroform -1,2-D i c I'll o roe t han e? -2-E-!utanone ~ B r c J m a cj-i ;L o r o m e t h a ri e -1 ,, 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e -Ca r bcjn Te't r a c h 1 o r i de? -Bromod i chloromethane -1,2-Di chioropropane -c i s-1,3-D i c h1o ro p ro pen e - T r i c h 1 o r o e t h e n e -D i b r o m o c li 1 o r o m e -t I'lan e -1,1,2-Trichloroethane -Benzene - t r a n s - l , 3 - D i c h l o r o ' p r o p e n e -E<romoform ~4-MetLiyl-2-F"entanone? -2-1-le X an one -Tetrachloroethene -1,2-Ditaromoethane -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -Toluene -Chloroben zene -Etliyl ben zene - S t y r e n e -Xylene ( t o t a l ) ...~ '_ ZZJl - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e - 1 , 4 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e - 1 , 2 - D i ID r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o pane CONCENTRATION ( u g / L ) 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 • 0 . 1 1 Q ;u .u ;u u •^ U >r R :u u ;u .u ;u ,u ;u ;>=^R !U :u :u lU :u ;u ;u ;u ',U ;u ;u ;u ;u '^K ;u :u :u : J ;u FORM I LCV Reviewed By Date U 10/92 ILCE LOW CGNC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH U b Code: GULF Lab Sample ID: WAWOOl Lab File ID: VOWAWOl F' u r q e V o 1 u m e: 2.5j,..0 0. _ (m 1) Contract: EPA SAMPLE NO, MWOOO5 Case No.s HLA AS No-: SDG No.: 950: Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 D.i. 1 ution i-"actor: 1-0 Number TICs found: 0 CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAi'lE RT S T . CONC. ( u g / L ) Q Reviewed By Date FORM I L C V - T I C f 302915 10/92 ILCA LOW CONC- WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ;..ab Name: ETC/.GU(-F SGUTI-i Lab Code: GULP Case No. Lab Sample ID: WAWOO5 Lab File ID: V0WAW05R Purqe Volume: ii^.5_;.00.._ (ml) -I L A Con-tract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE MWOlOl SDG Ho.: 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/22/95 Dilution Factor: 40 CAS NO, 74-87-3 74-33-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-59-2 — 156-60-5— 67-66-3 — 107-06-2-• 73-93-3 - 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 — 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 — 56-23-5-— 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 — 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 — 10061-01-.' 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 — 124-48-1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 — 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 — 10061-02-6 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 — — 108-10-1 591-73-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 103-38-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7 541-73-1 106-46-7 '95-50-1 96-12-8 COItPOUND ~Chlorometl'iane_ _ .._ -B romome t han e -Vinyl Cliloride -Chloro(-3 thane -f'ietby 1 ene Cilloride -Acetone -Ca r bon D i su 1 f i d & -1,1-Dichloroethene -1,1-Dichloroethane -c i s-1,2-D i ch1o roe t hen e -trans-l ,2-1)1 chloroethene -Clnlorof orm -1 ,2-Di chlorcjethane_ „_ -2-Butanone - B r o m o c h 1 o r cjfri e -t t'l a Ti e -1 ,1,1-Tri chloroeth.ane -Carbon Tetrachloride -!'• romod i chloromethane -1,2-Di c l"i 1 o r o p r o pan e -c i s-1,3-D i c h1o ro p ro pen e - T r i c h 1 o r o e t h e n e - D i ta r o m o c li 1 o r o m e t l"i a n e - 1 . , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e -E^enzene ^_ - 1 r a n s - 1 , 3 - D i c h1oro p ro pen e -Bromoform -4-Methyl-~2-F'entanone -2-1-lexanonG - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e -1,2-Ditaromoethane - 1 ,1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e - T o l u e n e -Chlorobenzene -Ethyl ben z en e -Styrene -Xylene (total) ,; -1,3-Dichlorobenzene - 1 , 4-DiclTlorol-jenzene I -1 ,2-Di chlorobenzene ^ 1,2-Di b r omo-3- c h 1 o ro p r o pan e ._. CONCENTRATION (uq/L) Q 9o 40 40 40 QeC ^ ^ 'W^ 200 40 40 40 40 40 40 200 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 200 200 40 40 40 4 40 720 40 „ 2000 40 302916 -^Q 40 40 U ucr u u ' ^ R u u u u u L.l LJ LI U U U U U LJ U U U U u u u J u u E T LJ U U U •ORM I LCV ^ Reviewed By Date ^ - ' ^ ^ J l ^ ^:3l3)l^5-' ILCE LOW-CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lata Name: EIC/GU H.ab Code: GULF SOUTH Case No. : l-ILA Lata Sample ID: W£t.W00.5_ Lab File ID: vgWA.WO..e05: !-'uI-• qe Volume: 25..,0.0._ (m 1) Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MWO101 SDG No-s 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 0j?:/22/95 Dilution ("actor: 40 •-lumber TICs found: 0 CAS NUMBER COMF'OUND NAME EST. CONC, ( u q / L ) Q Reviewed By Date •ORM I LCV-TIC 302917 1 0 / 9 2 ILCA 1-OW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET O f - i r i t —i:.. ^•i^siteatajii Lab Name: r:nil/G.U Lab Codes GULF SOUTH Case No.: HLA Contracts SAS No.: iBGWO; Lab Sample ID: WAW002 Lab File ID: V0WAW02R Purge Volume: 25^j00__ (ml) : SDG No. : 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 -m »»'.-.«-»«-*-c • ^ . ^ - ^ ' • J -, CAS NO, 74-87-3 74-83-9 - 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0- - 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 — 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 — 156-59-2— 156-60-5— 67-66-3 107-06-2 73-93-3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 — 71-55-6 tr. / f ^ t - y r: 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 — 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 — 10061-01-', 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 — COMPOUND CONCENTRATION (uq/L) Q 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6 75-25-2 108-10-1- 591-73-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 108-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7 541-73-1 -.-— 106-46-7 -^— 95-50-1 96-12-8 -Chloromethane -E< romome thane -Vinyl C h 1 o r i d e -Chloroethane -i'le t hyl en e Chloride -Acetone -Carbon I)isu 1 fide -1,1-Dichloroethene -1,1-Di chloroethane -ci-;5-l ,2-Di chloroethene — t ran s-1,2--D i c h 1 o r oe t hen e - C h l o r o f o r m - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e -2-E-iutanone -I<r omo chlo rome thane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane •-1,2-Di chloropropane •-cis-1,3-Dichloropropene —Tr i ch 1 oroetbene _. •-Dibromochloromethane — 1 , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e ._. —E<erizene_ — t r a n s - l ,3-Di chlorcTpropene —E<romof orm —4-Metljyl-2-F'entanone --2~Hexanon(-3 —TetrachloroetJ-iene — 1,2-Ditaromoethane - - 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e —Toluene j —Chlorobenzene --Ethyltaenzene — S t y r e n e —Xylene (total) —1,3-Dichlorobenzene — 1,4-Di chloro'oen zene . — 1,2-D i c h1o ro ben zene —1,2-Dibromo-3~chloropropane_ 302918 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i:: V . ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0-3 1 0.07 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 u UT u u u Li U U U U LJ u LI U LJ LI U LI Li U LJ U U u u u a u J u J u u u FORM : - ^ ^ iT.ULtB^JCi^V ^ ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOLATII-E ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMF'OUNDS Lab Name: ETC/GU1...F SOUTH Contracts fab Code: GULP Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. REiGWO: SDG No.: 9502: Lab Sample ID: WAW002 Lab File ID: V0WAW02R Purqe Volumes 25_..00.. (ml) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/22/95 Dilution Factor: l^^O •lumber TICs found: CAS NUMBER 0 COMPOUND i-<IAME RT :ST. CONC. ( u g / L ) Q V Reviewed By Date — •ORM I LCV-TIC 302919 10/92 ILCA LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Contract: ^ab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.s Lab Sample ID: WAA006 Lab File ID: V0WAA06R Date F\eceived: Da te An a1yz ed: EPA SAMPLE NO. TB0214 SDG No-s 950: 02/16/95 02/17/95 Purge Volume: 25..j00_. (ml) Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTR'ATION (uq/L) Q 74-87-3 74-33-9 ^^• 75-01-4 7 5-00-3 7 5-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-59-2 156-60-5 67—66—3 107-06-2 73-93-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 56-23-5 • 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5 79-01-6 124-43-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6 7'5-2 5-2 103-10-1 591-73-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 103-83-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7 541-73-1 'V— 106-46-7 95-50-1 96-12-8 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride C h 1 o r oe t han e Me t hylene C h1o r i d e Acetone Car bon D i su1f i d e 1,1-Die ill o roe then e 1,1-Dichloroethane cis-l,, 2-Di chloroethene t ran s~ 1,2-D i c h 1 o roe t lien e Clnloro'form _. •1,2-Di c h l o r o e t h a n e 2-Bu t a n o n e E< r omo c: h 1 o r ome t han e 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t i - i a n e •Carbon T e t r a c h 1 o r i d e Etromodi chlorome thane 1,2-Diehioropropane c i s-1,3-D i c h 1 o ro p ro pen e -Trichloroethene -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2-Tricliloroe thane -E<enzene -trans-l ,3-Di c hi oro propene___ -Bromoform _ -4-Metl^iyl—2—Pentanone -2-HeXanone -Tetrachloroethene -1,2-Dibromoetl-iane - 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e -Toluene -Chlorobenzene -E t by1 ben z en e -Styrene -Xylene ("total) " -1,3-Dichlorobenzene -1,4-Dichlorobenzene -1,2-Di ch1oroben zene -1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane J. 1 1 1 ntr ^ 1 :i. 1 1 ^\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FORM I LCV Reviewed By Date _ uT u LJ U LW--R u u Li LJ U U LJ LJ U u T u u u u u LJ u LJ LJ uT • ^ R u u u u u u LJ U u u u UO" 10/92 ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ETC/GUI.-F SOUTH kab Code: GLJL.F Case No.: HLA Contract: SAS No.s EPA SAMPLE NO. TB0214 SDG No.: 950: Lata Sample ID: WAA006 Lab File IDs V0WAA06R Purge Vo1umes 25.00 (ml) Date Received: 02/16/95 Date Analyzed: 02/17/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 •-lumber TICs found CAS IMUMBER COi-'lPOUND NAME RT EST. CUNC ( u g / L ) Q Reviewed By ^ — f H ^ < ' ^ C - ^ |/^f>.1TOM^. Date FORM I LCV-TIC 302921 10/92 ILCA LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH k-ab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: WAW006 Lab File ID: V0WAW06R F'u rq e Vol ume: 2 5_..00__ (m 1) COMPOUND Contracts SAS No.s EPA SAMPLE NO, TB0216 SDG No. : 950: Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 74-87-3 74-83-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 — 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-59-2 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 67-66-3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 73-93-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 56-23-5 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5- 79-01-6 124-43-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6- 75-25-2 108-10-1 - 591-73-6 127-18-4 106-93-4 79-34-5 103-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7— 541-73-1 — 106-46-7 95-50-1 96-12-8 Chloromethane Bromomethane V i n y 1 Chlori d e C h1o roe t ban e Methylene Cliloride Acetone Carbon Disu1fide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Di chloroethane cis-l,2-Dichloroethene trans-l,2-Dichloroethene Chlo rofo rm 1,2-Di chloroethc"ine_ 2-r:iu'tanone_ _ .Bromo chlo rome thane 1,1,1-Trichloroetl-iane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromodichloromethane. 1,2~D i c li 1 o r o p r o pan e cis-l,3-Dichloropropene —j-Tri chloroethene Di b romo c h1o rome t han e 1 , 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e Eienzene t r a n s - l , 3-Di ch-il oro pro pen e E<romof orm 4-Methyl-2-F'entanone 2-HeXanone Tetrachloroethene 1,2-D i b romoe thane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Toluene Chlorobenzene Etliyl ben zene Styrene Xylene (total) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Di chloroben zene , 1 ,2-Di chloroben zene ! 1 , 2-D itaromo-3-clnloro pro pane CONCENTRATION ( u g / L ) 1 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 302922 1 1 1 Q ,u u u u !U U .U U ,u u Li u u u u ,u u :u u ',u • u ;u ;u :>KR ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u :u ;u FORM I LC'. vYAEnDPa"E Reviewed By Date — 10/9: ILCE LOW CONC. WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CGMF'OUNDS Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH |ab Code: GULF Case No-: HLA_ Lab Sample ID: WAW006 Lab File ID: VQWAW06R Pu-rge Volume: 25.00 (ml) Contract: SAS No.s EPA SAMPLE NO. TB0216 SDG No - : 9502: Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution l~actor: 1-0 Number TICs found; CAS NUMBER O COMPOUND NAl'lE RT EST- CONC- ( u g / L ) Q V Reviewed By Date FORM I LCV-TIC 1 0 / 9 2 302923 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Semivolatile Organic Compounds Analysis CLOU CoNcervJTRATiOK)) Case Number : <^ ^ O Z Z - '-^'^•- ^ 0 ^ ^ r ( CJ/s^A^^ic^ C Project Number 2 ^ S 7 2 J V - Z - V Validatic Contractor Laboratory: R/V QJ^ \Ad^ Validator. Validation Date: 3/31/^^ (5C Reviewer 0 ^ 0 i 2 < / ^ ?^ T Z / ^ U c ^ Review Date: / / Ip^ / f j ~ Sample Matrix: \ ^ ( ^ ^ Q ^ Analytical Method: ^ p / ^ QXJ? fjbfn^ C j m ^ J ^ y ^ ^ ^ A j J L ^ SOLO Sample Designations: mujooo 1 hi 1/0 0003 W)\AJ0oo4- ^.iA;oon5' w\\A)n)o\ PBcuun-Z- Data for the above samples are: _ _ ^ _ _ Acceptable for use V Acceptable for use as qualified , Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Pj»ject Manager? Yes rNo Coniments • Dftfc^ OA apUy^J^XL^ .Mj-aJiuLoisJl j<AAVy^ z k ^ (Vd7u<:^ bna_l.doc 1014I9W1034 Form BNA 1.0 302924 DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST X Included, no problems * Included, problems O Not included NA Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative X Surrogate Recovery Summary - ^ MS/MSD Summary j(f- Reagent Blank Summary V GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary ^ La bo i^*fo<"^ dov&yol 5ampU Suvmyr^ary Sample Data • ^ Chain of Custody Forms y Holding Times X Organic Analysis Data Sheets y Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data ^ Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data ^T' Calibration Summary y Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data y DFTPP Mass Spectra X Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X DFTPP Mass Listings bDa_l.doc 10141994 I t m 2 ^^'^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ 3 0 2 9 2 5 Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike Data and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstmcted Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample X Organic Analysis Data Sheets V Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Conmients: bru^l.doc 10141994 1034 3 Form BNA 1.0 302926 _ _ _ _ _ Harding Lawson Associates = ; = = Engineering and s i — -'. Environmental Services SHEET OF PROJECT. SUBJECT JLAayyr.fi r ^ / r ^ ^ W ^ ^ ^ M \)p:kQ. ^cXm^k^^ry- thji^yjr r p m^'3>loz\f?'^^ yniAJooo] ynuJooo3 YYl^OOO^ m\^jooo5' ^B&uJoZ TBOZI + TBOZ\(fi JOB NO. DATE 3l3oh^ COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY ^M, 'Q. "fpX/rtljXieTAA^ X2. \/0A \/jOO^ \A}AVJ003 \/JA\^oo\ \AJf^\A}D05' ViAVJOOz. VJA A 00(0 VJAvJOoO IA^ 302927 SPECrnC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved jyuLreceived in good condition? Yes ( N O ^ Were custody transfers consetly and completely documented? Yes) No ( ^ n ^ f c t e r ^ . ^4&^/^>*'^K^; -JUr^A>y^J^^(r\Ji .A^i^^^^^JaHi^ JX>^^^^ J^^-^f^y^y^ i^^'^'^c) Q/V\.S.J^^ >t^^LuxjLt<je. :ti4/^-<j<r^ d-t^uwvA^- Xlu^e./^^^^''^^p^^^ „ 5 B F { A / 5 % S&'f\kl\3-\^^ S^^\f\\^0-^'7^, SBfZA/o-l^ a^dblU Holding Times Were sample extractions pprfsnTied within holding dmes? /Yes) No Were sample analyses perfpnned within holding times? /Yes) No Comments: ylmu. Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? p'esj No Were samples analyzed within the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? (Yes) No Comments: yl^vx^ baa_l.doc I0t4\994 1014 4 Fonn BNA I.O 3 0 2 9 2 8 Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibratiopj^ /Yes) No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? ^ ^ Yes / N O ) Did the initial calibration rasM die minimum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? /Yes) No J Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibration curvps^neet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)'' Yes /^No^ Did the continuing calibratjoajneet the minimum RRF criteria? 'Tes) No c _ X ^ «r'*"««» J^/^MM A .25 r,v «Tit^iU> b[U_l.ciac 10141994 1034 <: J Form B.SA 1.0 302929 Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike tseeveries within acceptance limits? /Yes) No If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No / N ^ Comments: FUIVL Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample deUyecy group (SDG)? /Yes) No Were the matrix spike recoveries and-relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes /NOJ Comments: VYl 5/yYl 5 P ^AX^dtjOl^-J/rTl^ OYUL(l?V^^r-<>^J^JL{XA\d- [%&yA:k tJL-iOjJ/lj^^^-i^^dJ^ M ^ Myynf^ O n / j ! i f ^ OAXcJU^Mr JA>^AJL o A z f t A ) ^ ^ mternai Standards Were the internal standard areas and retention times within tll6 required limits? (Yes) No If the internal standard requirements were nofniet, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No /NAJ Comments: yVu^ voa_l.doc 10141994 1032 Fonn VOA I J 302930 Blank Analyses Were the appropriate nunii)er<)f blaivk analyses performed? Yes) No Were analytes detected iii,ihe^lanks? (Yes) No If analytes were detected in the blanks, were the same analytes also detected in the associated investigative samples? 'Yes) No NA Did the sample results reqjjire qualification due to die presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? (Yes) No Comments: J ^ {^^ W ^ ^ ^ ^ f h f A ^ ^ ^ ( i ^ ^ X l S i 'jyi^zkhMiJ*- jloJ!yt\^f^sruA^OnAfZ2^^ ;phL O/i^j^Qyv J I S M A M \ 0 :^A;ine4^ J;Ls^ a/n(iyuM^^ ^ ^^LJL Adjidw-^X^vM" ^ jWi^tl^^ j ^ PL. Laboratory Control Samples Were laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses performed at die correct frequency? ( Yes) No NA Were the LCS recoveries within acceotable limits? Yes f No) NA Comments: 4U^-eY'?v^''^.r>x^ O^V^S^ Y^A/cdSi^jLji^rJ2^ -i^rv f\l-VAbl^^v^t&^^>ili2,t^^ Jo^rOJ^ OAKJM (^yy^yx. :xlji.JxQMA^ boa^l-doc 10141994 1034 7 P^"" BNA 1.0 3 0 2 9 3 1 Sample Results Were target analytes reporte4Jn the investigative samples? (Yes) No Were mass spectra provideji4OT the target analytes reported in the investigative samples? ^ e s ) No Were the mass spectra oraee€ptable quality and analytes correcdy identified? (Yes) No Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (^JftFs^ acceptable? TYes) No Comments: YWt Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identified-eempound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? C^YesJ No NA Were all non-target peaks^fivahiated as required? (Yes) No Were the TIC mass specD5i,-«earches. identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? (Yes) No Comments: ywe. bcu.l.doc 10141994 1034 8 ^°"° ^ ^ ^ ^-^ 302932 Log Books Were sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance widi method protocols? resj No Were sample analyses propcriv documented and performed in accordance widi metiiod protocols? (^Ye^ No Comments: ywt • bM.l.doc 10I4I994 1034 9 ^°"° ^^'^ '•" 302933 Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning 2. / 2 7 / ^ 5 Relative Abundance: Initial Calibration 2 / ^ / ^ S l %RSD: Continuing Calibration = W F "°^- R R F - RRF2g ^ ( ^ 4 . , 0.118 ^ , .^A<^ n Surrogate Recovery UOl W 0 0 0 ^ bM_l.doc 10141994 1034 10 Form BNA 1.0 3 0 2 9 3 4 Matrix Spike Recovery j\/1|lA\JOO£fj QLAML RPD: _ m s j ^ _ ^ x g ^ ^ - Vn^v % ^M^^>^ .^^^^ _ p ^ Sample Results \YAVJ 0 0 0 \ CRQL 5" X I OOP >< ' ^ ^ 0 0 0 ^-^l^l^^v^ (>^/-^) Detected Result: (W^j,,.^^ flM^JlI^ ( W l ^ ^ , G,n<:^K*u.C^ I3nz X 2o__ 30.21 >^/i »4 2,4-Awt^^£p(W>^ 33077 X 0.244 TIC Result X s (Xn^ui X (\ji^imtA«- r^ctH^ L,TioU X 1.0 00 bQj_l.doc 10141994 1034 11 Form BNA 1.0 3 0293 5 HOLDING TIME QUALinCATION SUMMARY FORM to o to VD Sample Identification Date Siimplcd IfaU JL^JL'^y. tOvL^ A^e^^vi 1" ^ \ Date Prepaix;d i4;V Date Analyzed Prep. Holding Time Analysis Holding Time Qualifier • i Comments: b«ii_I.dtjc 10I4I9W low 12 FocmBNA 1.0 INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time khh'^ — — — — Insuument c Analyte toi-yl-z^frlylp^i+ii/^la-fc \ RF RSD i<0.09')\(>3o^'^ — 33.^ Samples Affected f O i / ^OUA^^Ali^l^ V 5 / Qualifier rf- \ o lO vo LO Comments: 1»,..1..1.»: 101419K4 1034 13 FaniBNA 1.0 CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time 1 2/27/^5* Instrument 1 ^ Analyte b 1S/Z-cVil irvD ftUn/l')<^lW lj2.U-Xv-i c^lnY„bm2f.y»d }^^^OcU\oY(>]0lJti'aAitYl^ }4^y/5 r.L\trfn (»yc/opi».Vf\'«ac Z-Ni+rnrtMiliVi^ 2,4-Dlyii-h^pWyio| ' 1 Di-yi-oc-K/l p)^-Hi/il/»te RF i^O.oS) — — \VNL 2. %D -^^.C 2^.2- 3?.^ % ^ Tn.o ^ . 3 C ^ ^ l -44^1 Samples Affected i ( ^ ( ' l A^l^^M-jic^") 1 ^ • Qualifier T/UJ" >!/ 1 Comments: to o to vx> w 00 10141994 I0i4 14 Fonn BNA 1.0 BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID 1 ^BUCOl Analyte '^{^f2rP^U^\[^py.(i)pV\\vi,{^ \ Blank Result (units) 1 r/«3/-4) U. 5" Action Level 1 6^/-^) iTc? Associated Samples CncQ A ^ ^ v v ^ ^ ^ 1 V • 0 ^ — T ' " " w o to VD to VO Coinincnis: 10141994 1034 15 Fotm BNA 1.0 Summary and Conclusions (tl W\cdXvA.Q^ \/\B^ \ M ArtJ^<>^Mry-JM A^^iZl d(dCrt .JAse^ ^/yg^jt'gx.^./ J-^-*-^ r.^il^AA^yi-i^k^ OIJLCSI^, OO^AJ. A /^a^i;^:: /^ /vTtUv^ A-I . /^^ v^^-tx^^^tL^-^^ ; - r i u L c i . a ± h . _^LAHX£^ k^fY^ 1 K^/;\AAAg.rf)r ..A,.04.^ : . \ ^ . : . , . . ^ « ^ _ / J l ^ . ^'^'JiJ;. Vvi!6lm5D ADAUJ^ ! / V ^ '/mA< OaiiiT-i a±v.e-^ . P j ^ p . ^ .>|0/? Ao^ I ^ . / r e (^ y ^ / m r n A ^ ^ • 0^)1? (^(^fcow fUg . O^ev^A^fi^g^ AA/^^Jph^. OA^ C U A ( ^ / M ^ . . - Vahdaior's Signature: K . ^ \ \ i M Validator's Initials: t/ (^ QC Reviewer's Signanire: < ^ QC Reviewer's Initials /V/^/? u^. udxttM \ ^ j 1 Validation Date: L Z ^ ?^ 7^,/C/C,;^ Review Date: iihh^ ' ' t • v / / 2 / f £ - btu_l.doc 10141994 1034 16 Form BNA ID 302940 1...0W r-.QMC. WA'IER SEi'iIV01..ATILE;; ORGAN J CS A N A L Y S I S DATA :ET L a b N.^'ino: ETC/GIJ1...F 'iUj'.nH j Coder GIX£_ Case N o . : H.L^L i_ata Sanipl.G. I D : \^.MJOp£- L.ab F i l e I D : RVl^iWC-'f^k S a m p I •:•:•:• v o 1 uine : 1 0 0 0 ( H! ]. ) Cori cent rated Extract Volume: 1000 In j.ei;::ticin Vcilume: X...-..^ (ui) Contract: SAS -lilQ. : MlOOOOl (ul) SDG No.: 9^022_ Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analy7ed: 02/27/95 D i 1 u t i on F"ac tor : 1 „ 0 CA::;i cnj^.F'ni.ir-.iD CDNCENTRATIO (U.J/;...) 111--••'•4 ••••4 9':>-57-B :: OS- 6 0 - 1 — •; I-'"-,,.!., ._,^.. • ; l . . . . i - | .• •-> -I . . . /• •': . . . . y 10^ 1 • ? M . . r : ' " - <:•••• y -i. " • •..>•:::'"•• / •• r>(;>....-/./i..../I.... :;.31 •• .1. .1, • - . . . ) • • • • 6 0 6 - 2 0 •:•: 9 9 - - 0 9 - 2 - ... r I ::>.• ;• u j .1. ^ _^ i - !j;i.':'}• ( 2• •• C1 "11 oV'oe I.i'iy.i. ) i::.t!'iei" i "!<•'•••• I., ii.:. o r o p h e r I O.I. •. -2-1'1 e t h y I ,;:• heo.<::> 1'._ I -•- 2:., 2 ' - o x y b i ^ - - ( 1 - C h l o i ' o p i ' C j p a r i e ) _ 1 4-l'''ie t I'vyl. p I'len o 1 __. _ 1 - — N • • 1-1 ;i t r o •;;;. o - D1 •• i'i •• T' i" o i::i y 1 a in i n e I i' '••• X a c:l'i l o i " o e t I'lai'ie _ i ••• '•'•'• .1 t rc.i h e r I 7 e r ^ e _ _ i •- - -1 •:;;• c; K: 'n c r o I'l e _ _ _ _ 1 2 -1 -i i t r o p I' I •:.-• n c.i 1 _ _ I ••• •- -2 .: 4 • • Diii'ie t I ' I y i p!' 1 ';:;• n a 1 _ I • •• - L J I <;: ( 7 ' - CI i] o r o e •. ''lO x y ) t'ie li iarie_ ! ••'.:'. • •'i-")jii;::i'ilorop!"iei'ii;'.i. i - 1 ., 2 ., •': • "i I" :i (:;h] .Oi'C'beri :se;ie _ ' — 1-lapI'l•c^•|•/^.1.ei'ie _ > — '!•"•• h-i I.i.CH cjai'i:; .] i r i e _ - "i "'e X AC I'I 1 o r o b'..'.'L;V\'" 'i. •::! i e _ • .•1 c - • - . •'. . . . • • : ' );• _ . . ; . I . . . . " • . . . ' , . . . . " ' ........ I I I . , , ,. , ,.... ^ . . . . | , ^ , . , I I | . . , . I I I I n...! I I , I ^ ^ - - 2 •- M e I;. 1 "1 y 1 r i a p 1 "i i: i"i a 1 e i "i e _... \ ^ -• l-ie X a c: 1' 11 > ,i r o c y c 1 o p e n 1;.arl ;i ei'> e 1 - 2 ,, 4 ,, 6 •- T r i c i lii. o r o p !"i e IITJ 1 _ _ _ _ 1 2.,; 4 ,, 5 - " r i - i d-iloi-Of'TieriOx 1 — /;;•••• I...-hi 1 o r o r i a p ! ' ! i..^"ia 1 e n e i — 2•••• I--S1 V. I- o a n :i. 1 :i. ri e „ 1 -•••• D ill,e t |-,y 1 F h 11",a l a t e \ 1'; c'Oi 1 a \j I'I t h y .i. e n e _ i 2 ., 6 ••• D iri i t i o x o 1 ueI'l e _ _._ i 3 • !-1 ;i. 1.1- o a r I ;i. ;i i 1-1 •:;• 1 A c e i"i a Tl hi I. hi e i' i e i Q ; i-i ; LI J ' r: I ir. 1 :u ; Li 1 1 1 ' ^ R ; L T ' i 1 N.) 2 0 ; i.j T ; LI ; L I : i I Reviewed Date I • l . . l | v r i .1. I... .....;:.• v .1. 1 0 / 9 2 302941 .UW LUMi..;., u.-iiER SEhilVUi_ATlLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET « L a b H a (lie: E:iil/&:il:.E_.30im;l a b C o d e : GLILF Ca€>e Wo,, r HLA. ..D S a m p l e I D : WAW004 L a b F i l e I P : S a m o l e voli.iiue;i Contract: SAS .Ho. s MWOOOl SDG Ho. '. 9502: SVWAW04L. 1.0.00.,.._ (ml) Ccin cent rated Extract Volume: 10C>0_ I n I e c t i o:"i K-'n 1 UIIK.:- ;I :'. „ O (i..i. 1 j (ul) Date Received: 02/17/9 5 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 D :i. 1 u t n o i' i F' a c t o r : 1 . 0 CAS cr.;-';pn!..iHD CONCENTRATION (ug/L) I.) I ».i.I. " • • / : . ( : : • — ; 1 0 0 - - 0 2 - - 7 - ; 1 3 2 - - 6 4 - 7 - ; 1 2 1 ••••14 ••-2 • ; 8 4 - 6 6 - 2 ; 7 0 0 5--72••••:: ;i.O'..)-o-:. . 1 . ••"" ...I . . . I " . . . • ' • : • ( - • > . . . . •\ •••••. . . : : : ' . ; • • : ; • • • • ' /::,, 4--I.:' j. Il :i. x v >'.• p h e n o .1 _ - -"•••T"-~Hi t i"ophieno .i. T>:i L;iei"i/Uj'f'i.u'ai'i 2 ., 4• • D i n i •!;.roto 1 u.erie •• -1) 1 e •: |-1 y 1 :• • h -i;. h a 1 a t e _ -"i—C hi 1 o r o p h e n •;/1 ••- o h e ri y 1 e x h e i'' -•- r ' l u o i ^ e i ' i e — -'•(••-hi ;i. 1;. I'oari 1 1 1 . i'lO _ _ _ _ — 4., 6-;.);!. |-1 ;i t i " o - - 2 - r i e t h'yj p h e n o l - r l - h i i •!;.ro^'iOi..' i p l ' i e i i y l a i n i n e ( 1 ) - —'-i J-• I•• of;ic< p i ie!'r y.) — p heri y'i <:•• t ^i<;.•• r... •- -I'leXai;:;111 o;• ^.jben ver^ie ._ - F' i'; ':.a(-li.i.oroCih^vrio.; !••'he!"i a n 'Li'^i i"eri e ^ i'^'iri'l. 11 r a (::erie _ — D i — r I ••• B <.\ t. •;/11J i"i i;. i'^i a 1 a t e _ - r 1 \x o r -a r 11. \ i (::• r i e • : . . 1 . < : : • • ;;. ;i 7 —Bu.t.yl beri z'y 1 ph'l;.; ; a l a ^ t e _ . •-3 ., 3 ' ••••D i I.:.I'I 1 orobc^'i'i z ic! ;i.I'l( • -• h•:::r\.7 ci (-i'.) A; 1 '>'..\ I r a c e r i e . r;hrv';;:.(?rie ; . : . ' • > / • • - . A : ' . - v - -•• ; L.&-32 ••o ; 193••••39 •5 ; 1 9 1 ••-24-2 - ' - -• •••• h 1 •H^ ( 2•••• i;-: i;. !•,•;•• :i. h e X y 1 ) F' h •':. I'la ]. a •I.e. .. ' -D i •••• r I - 0 <:: t y 1 i--' h t [ia 1 a i:e '. - B e n 7. o ( h ) r' 1 i..i(;>i"ari t l^ierie * y , ' I . \ '•"• '" - 1 - 4 - t ~ . . . • • - - . ' • • • i . . . ' l I / . I . J V I ' , ' ! ' • .1 ' • " • - ' !• ' : ' ' ' ^ ^ I • ' • • ' I I ' • • ' _ . . Bien /; (J ( a ) i - ' y r e r i e , -• 1 ru:leI'lo ( 1 ,, 2 ,, 3 •••(::(:! )i'''yi^'ei"ie _ D i her'i;:: ( a ,, li) ('ii'i •I. hi^"a(;:ei^:e — B:(?ri ;•; o ^ >.:\ ,, hi „ x ) i •'(::• i-^^•>'.I.(•:•:• rie 2 - r • '0 0 5 5 c: 5 i;: 0 ..,1 r: •3 5 5 i:: r: : Li : i...i ', LI ; L.l ; Li ; L I ; L: :Li ; Li ; Li ; H 3 - ILi ; Li : Li T ; LI 1 LI ! I..1 ;LI : LI I u ( 1 ) -- C a n n o t IJO ir.:Vi. t e d •ri'Od; l);i. p h e r i y l a i n i i ' i e VALI DAT Reviewed By Date FORN I 1 0 / < 302942 1 OW CCiNC, WATER S E r ' U V O u A T I L E ORGANICS ANAL.YSIS DATA SLIEET T E N T A T I V E L Y I D E N T I F I E D COMROLiNDS E a b Maine: EIC/.CL)l..F.JjO!JIIi..„ h C o d e r ^;>}J±:f_ C a s e Wo..: r^k!^!-. ^ab S a m p l e I D : WAW004...,. L a b F i l e I D : SVWAUIOflL^ S a m p l e v o l u m e ; ; lOQO. _ ( m l ) Coil c e n t r a t e d Extraci: V o l u m e : l.C'.OC).. I i-i J e c. t i oi-i V o 1V.iue ;; „ _ 1...:.0 (u 1 ) Contract: eAt;> i4,-i - (U.l) ; MWOOOl SDG Wo~: 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: Q 2 / 2 7 / 9 § , Dilution Factor;: O p f i : <;> • •••lumber' TItin;. •fourid CAS NI..I;MBZK coi^iF'Oi.ihiD WAr'i:; ! r'HENui...., ••••Dir'lETi-iYL- ;Lii-;i<i-i0W:^: ; B;;;;i••!/cic AC];D,. -Ni;;:T:-iv ; BENZOIC ACID., ••-LiETi-iY' ri.:T ; 11., 0 9 ; : 1 2 - 2 5 ! •i '•.•• • " ' ( • < • 12.. 3 2 ; E S T . \ '••'• coi-ic;. : ; / L ) 9 1 3 4 2 0 : : c ..TN ..^N J N JM VALIDATED ! ( - • • : " | . ' . TI( 302943 :Li..UB 1...0W COi-iS. UIATER S E f l l V O L . A T I L E O R G A N I C S A N A L Y S I S D A T A S H E E T E P A S A O P L E N O - MWOOO: L a b H a t n e : ! ; [ I i V G l j U f _ j S Q i ) T [ i b Code: GULF Case No.: H:.. A Contract: SAS -Wo. : SDG No.. : 95022 i..ab Sample ID: WAW00.3 Lab File ID: SyWAU!03.L.... Sample v(jlum(?: I.y00. (iiil) C o r i (•:en t r a t e c l L'lx •l.rarxl;. VCJJ. udu;;';: 10'C'O In j ecti.oi^i V o l i,,une : L...Q ('•'•i. ) '....'..I II '..• •..:: I.'.. ( n 1 ) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 D :i. J. u 't :i o n F" a r: t o r: 1 . 0 •-i\-\" 7 . 8 i...l...M'ii..-r:.i'-. I TM-i I .1.l..ii-i (U(j/I... ) n i 0 S - - 9 5 ^ - 2 111^^^44--4^-- ' " • ' 1 - - . . . . f"-' " ' • ' . . . . ' ' . ' . • ?!:'•-4 8 - 7 - f \ f ' , \ •• •• v.: i"'hi (v? ;• I o .1. _ _ 1 •:>:(.%( 2 ^ ^ C r i l o r o ( ' r l ; . i v v l ) E ' l h o r '• !i^!^^Ci| .1, (:'i!"0 p i'l(::-riO.:, _ I .(.! • ]''1(->;'l.I'l'y' I. pl'ien'.:) .i. _ i :l 0 9 - - 6 0 - 1 - 2 ,, 2 ' ••••Cixybii;;. ( :i •-L!:hli::ii-ciproF:'<^i'"if^O .,., i 1 0 6 ^ - 4 4 - 5 4 - h i e t h y l p h e i - i o l \ 6 2 1 — 64•••• 7 —~ - N-N:i. troi::-o••• !• i -ri•••• r-'i"op•/1 am:1.rio_ I 6 ..'•'•••• 7 2 •••• 1 — h ! e x a cl"i .1. o r o e ^ t '"lario:;' i hi\y XroLJeVi 7 e r i e _ 1 1 •:;•; o p i 11 c'j !•" (;j i'l (•:•;• _ i - /:!^-l-li'I.i"(;.ii:.rio;;rio.1. , 1 0 5 •••• 6 7 •• • 9 - •••• 2 ,. 4 •••• D 1 (i i e 't h y 1 p n e n o 1._ 1 1 !L 'i.—'y'.]. ••• !i. - - b i ^;. ( 2 - L'\ I A. o i " c^':.yk.l lO X y ) r'io';. i^::^. n e _ ! A..:-'...-'•••• i:-i..'.:• •••'.:;'. -..-:'.,, 4 •• D:i. cI'i.i.o 1"o[:• \",(•-• r>o.1, 1 1 2 0 - - 8 2 ' ^ 1 - 1 ., 2 ., 4 ^ I ' i ' i c: I'hi. o i-tj b e r > / c x i e ! V 1 ••••!>;!(.'"••• :••- I'-lapI'vl;. I'la .1. e>"! o 1 l ( - 6 - •-/••••8 - - 4-Chl(:;.i-f;(ari 1 1 i r i o I \:' /••••.;•••.;-:••••••.:.• — — HeX a(:;i"i.1,o\~cr::r.xx.AO i (v>i i o '::'V-'::<0-'7-- - •'•••••(!'• I'LI.or^o- 3 ^ ^ T i e ' i h . l i:.ii l e r i o ] _. _ I V'.'.. • h ./••-.:•::• — — x! -i^le '•:. i I'/l ri a i j l i 1;. II a.I. e;'i (X' i 7 / ' - • 4 7 ^ - 4 ;"lex a c h!; ( x i ' c x - y c J, CJCO-XI •Lac' i e r i e [ ;';;;(:5^^^06-2 - - 2 ., 4 ,, 6 • I'r^x ( : : h l o r ( j p i ^ i e i ' K j l 1 yl......9';-,....4 ...2 , y i „ '•^...••(•|...; ,-. i..^-j o r c'lpLieviCil 1 V ' C'c'"' / - i.'."i.-, I'l 1 o r o i ^ i a '~< \"t t h a .1. e n (•:^• 1 -JO" I L.. ; u 5 : u r-. 1 I ! ; L i 3 " L: i j 1 -.'.'i i. •••• 1 1 ••••,;>•• 2C><;;;-96--o^ 6 0 6 ' 2 0 ^ - 2 ' 99....r)9....2 — 8 3 - 3 2 ^ ^ - 9 - - \ \ X • ^ • • • o a i i :i. .1. :i. I'r: 2 0 •••• !•'.': ill(•:;• 'LLiy !1. I"''ri y.r,a 1 o. x c — I'l (::ei"i a p it i. I "I'y'l eri e •2 , 6--r';i. ci :i. ' t r ' o L o l u e n e - 3 - ^ N i 'l. I'cxari :i J. i i ' i e ••-I'-i cei'i a |::> I'vt I "lei'i e ; Li ' u ; L I T ;L: ; Li ; L I 5 I o Reviewed By Date — F G R ; > I 1 1...C . L V ) / ' / . i L 302944 LOW CANC- WATER SEMIVOLATi;...E ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: r:TC/Gl.iLF SOOT!-) Contract: hwooo; ^••b t;ode: 0.0iJl Ca^ie No.,: HLA. Lab Sample ID: WAW002) Lab File ID: SVU..AW03L. Sa(;;i:)le volu(i";e: .'i-.Q.QiL. (iiix) r;en c:en "tra^i.ed Ex'•. i^acxl Voltuiie;; 1 0 0 0 I n j e c t i o ; I Vo 1 Luiiij ;; • 1 ,. 0 C u. 1 ) SDG No.: 9 50: (ul) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 Di ]. u t i ofi F"a c t o r : 1.^0 PFI: 7 . 8 CO;''i!'-'Oi..,''^-'D CONCENTRATION i h i n / L ) Q <..>•.:>•• 1 \ i:: ~-j - 100^^01--6^ J. 1;:: c. ' ; • •4 .1 i " <: <~ t: / • .1 .1 ' .; r :i :; ' . 1 . ;:.;• 7 - 2 (..' 4.... 0 6 . - 1 . — . / : . • / ' • ' . - • l-- . • . " ^ i ,1 / -i. 7 \0'i. l i ) / > ' > • • '^!>"' . •/ .1 -7. 8 6 • - : : : . •-0 c> ';•' *•') / . ' i:: L : - 0 — O • • • • ; • • ' r-. ... i \ •.'.'.'/.'. • ' " % • . ) 7C —2 - • • " C :;; • ) - ..." „ . " I . "• .1.'" <::•. , " • • _.,' • " • • _.; ••V • l . -(" ._. ;_... Q . .-;.' •o^ ..';;. .. •.../ ; - • .. '^' ' ? " • • _ ' • ; . .::!., '•:• ••.OJ.i"i x 't.rc'iiv levici.i. 4 - - N ; i . t r o p h - n o l _..''. D;; beri xo"i'i..u"ai: 2 ., '-v^ 'D '.':. I'l 1 •!;. i "(j 'Ldi .1. U('?r^i •'.-:: •••t••••^.. II .1. <:.: -"O p i( C; r': y .1. ••• p i^iOI'i y'.i. '••: C T'lO :" • T"li..K:;v:"erie I •4^^^!'^i:;. •Lr'Ci.aii i. 1 i n ( : : . _ 1 •4 ,, 6 - D i i i i •!;. r^cr-^'- " ' e t l i y l pl"(eric:hi. ! '/.:•.••••]•', I'TMiiij p ! 'lOi^! '•/.:. • •• ij Lie i'l yxl. e 'I. i'le I' .-. .••• i - . i ,-. -. riex ac;Tl.1.cj ;• oi;>en X ei'ie (••'e I "I i^ a (-!'I .i. (J I" c;' .1 h e I": o.!. h' 1 "I e i"i a I "I t i'11' (::• i"! e i'''il"i 'i.'. h I ' a <~x;:T\'.':: Di--i'i"-Bi..i.•t.yl ;::ii^v!,i-ialate r luciraii-y'iei'iv.;' F' y r e I'l (•;• Bii..''hyl be;-i x y l ch r i . h a l a ' i e 3 ., 3 ' •'"Di ":i-i 1 o;•'• o'~>e\\ z i(;! n.i"ie liei'i xc- ( a ) Ai"i 1;.hr'acierio CI "11" y s e 1 "1 e _ _ _ ' b:i.X- ( 2 " ' E t h y l i'lexy 1 )!-• l"i'1;.r.a 1 a'l.e ••Bvii 7 o (I;.) f ;i. tiorari l;. heiie "Bei'l xo (1'.) F'J.i..i.oi"an l;.hoi'io "L;en xo ( a ) i''''y'i"e;"ie_ • ![ri(j(X'i'!(;> (. 1 ., 2., 3^ (-d )l"'"/r^('-'ne -Di beri x ( a ., Ii) (•'•li'i 'i:.i'ii"a(::ei":e "Bien xo ( (:J ,, l"i., i ) i'''ei"^/'l.ei'ie i j a n r i o t i;) '::;.ep.:;i. r j(n i."'X p:'iei^!••;'.!.ac::;.I'l( Reviewed By Date 10 3 " (./ ; u 5 ;!.J 5 ; 1.1 5 ;u 5 ;i.! 5 : Li i 1 5 ; 1.] r; I I I I ) I I *-f \''-' ; LI : LI ; I i r-OiXl''i 1 LC£'--J- VAl! DATED mi 302945 LLKO CGNC,, UFiTpp S E 1 1 1 V 0 L A T I L E ORGANICS A N A L Y S I S DATA SHEET T E N T A T I V E L Y I D E N T I F I E D COfiPOHNDS # ' Lab Name: CIiVGLi!.Z..J5Ql:0[H. ab Code: GULF C a s e N o . hli._A T-.-.b Sam|;)le ID: W.AW003 Lat. F i l e ID: SyW.AlAi.03L_ Samijli-? v'jj.ume;; 1.0.Q0 (ml) Ccincen ti ated [extract Vcjlume: l.i200. I n j e c i; i o i "i v; <j l u. iv. <? : 1 ., p (u 1 ) Contract: SAS No,: (ul-) MW0003 SDG No-: 9502 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analysed;; Q2/27/.9.5. D i 1 u 'I i o r'l !••' a c t o i": 1.. - .0 i-'i-i ii ....Z.::.i;?. Hufiihei' T I C s I '..K.A' 1 '..I I....I"'.::;' ISL." i.'.'.i;:.!''^ ! COhii'-'OUiiD i'^IAME ; UNKNOWi-i H X E T H A N O N E H DIF'i-iENYI... ; UN KNOW;-! ;UNKNOWN : UNi'a^io:.^/;^-! RT ;; 4 „ 49 16. S5 17.32 17..70 17.99 EST. (u. CON:::;.. ';i/L) 9 42 10 '.-'* \L!. 1 f: ;..iN ; .ji'-! ;JK ;JN ;3N i .._ Reviewed By Date _ •ORH 1 L.CSV-TIC 302946 ILCB LOW, CONC. WATER SErllVOLATlLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: CIIVGU!^,^F_J50Ln.H b Code: GyL.P_ Case Nc'.: bLLA., Lab S a m p 1 e ID : W AuAiK)! Lab File ID: SyWAA.01_L ___ S a m I j I e volume;; 10.0 0 (m :i.) Con c e n t r a tied E x t r a c t v;r,lu(iie;; 1 0 0 0 . Injex:tiQt'^ Vo:iv.i.(':e :; i. . O ( u . l ) Con t r a c t : •iS -M EPA SA.t^iPLE NO, hWOOOA SDG W o . : 9 5 0 2 2 '' I.'. 1 'i I • J \ {"• I . : ,•••• 62'i • ,-x4-7 6 7 - 7 2 - • . - 9 8 - 9 5- 3 - 7 G - 5 V - 1 - 8 8 - 7 5 - 5 ^ • 1 0 5 - 6 7 - 9 .1. j . .i. '"•• '.'•' / , • " A. i 2 0 - - 8 3 - 2 :i. 2 0 - 8 2 - : i 9 1 - 2 0 - 3 - 8 7 - 6 ; 9 1 - / / 88- O r.\ r'' -c "/ .1. r-.f-. 13 20' 6 0 9 9 8 3 - 5 7 - 6 ^ -A'7-.Xi ...--. - 0 6 - 2 -9^:,...,,^ - 5 8 - 7 " 7 4 '\ L - 1 1 - 3 - 8 - 9 6 - 8 - i - 2 0 - 2 - - 0 9 - 2 - 3 2 - 9 ,1 ii^ii-'i 11 i N n D a t e R e c e i v e d : 0 2 / 1 6 / 9 5 D a t e E x t r a c t e d : 0 2 / 2 0 / 9 5 D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 2 / 2 7 / 9 5 l.l ;i. :i. u t i ori F"a. c t o r : 1 . 0 pLI: _..7_., .71 CONCENTRATION (uq/L) Q . 1 . O o — V .<•••• y.. r^ hei^iol _ 11 l~'a4-'-'- ij:!.•;;: ( 2--Ci-iloroGti'vyj. ) i:8t!"ier- ! V ,.i — ^1 / -• c:. .;:; -• 1... 1-;...;:.,: (.; n r i O f i O .!. _ i 9 5 - 4 8 - 7 2 - N e t h y l p l - i e n o j . "_ _.._ ; J 08'-60^-;i - - - - —2 ,,2 ' — c: xy!:^'i^>( 1—Cl^i]. o i ' o p r o p a r i e ).... 1 1 0 6 --^ '^: - :y - - 4 ••-h; e t h y 1 i:> h e n (:;• 1 ; - N—h!:!. !:.i"o^.o--Di — ri — F'i"CJpy:i. a(nj.rie__ \ —I'lexach:i.oroe':hane \ --N:i t r o b e r i x e n e . I I's o p I "I o r o n e _ _ I - 2 "'• !'-i i 'L V (-• p h e fi o :i, _ __ _ i 2 „ 4 - D i fi'i e t i"i'/ :L X:< I'I e r I n \. \ u i ^A.2. •••• C h 1 o V o e 'c. I "I o x y ) I'! (x t i "i a r i e 1 —2., 4 - D i <:. i'l 1 o r o p h e r> a 1 _ 1 1 .; 2 ., 4 "-Trx c i ' i l o r o b e n x e n e 1 - - i-i a p i "i '•: l"i a l e I'l e 1 —'••!• —L:!i.i (-.'roai'i i .1. :i.ri(v; _ _ , — :'i(xXX,.(-l"ilo!'"(;:i;xi.,!.'Lao 'i.ene , -"-2'"I'l(•;:• t i"iy :i. n a |;:' h t !-ia ]. ei": e . — i'le X e. (;: I' 11 o i" o c y c; 1 o p e i "i \ a d :i. e r i "•••• 2... 4 ., tl-• ! |- J. I'.r.I'l .1.oi"oI'.i 11 (•:•/ri<:< 1 2 „ 4 ,, 5 - ' l r i c l ' i : : o r ' o p i i e n o : i . /:! •••• i..j \"\ 1 o!" (!) n a iJ n t i "i ~.'. .1. e; "i e _ 2-hli •ti"oari i :i. i r i e - D i m e t h y l P l ^ i t l i a l a t e —(••ic:er'iaph'i-I'.y:!.eiU'V. . - •'- 2 ., 6 - D i n i •t r (J 1;. o 1 i.(e n e _ 2>-l'-li 'l. r o a r I :i. :i. ;i. n e _ - - I'l c e fi 3. p 11X hi (;• n e Reviewed By F"ORhi I 1...CSV-1 Date ;u J" ;u 5 c:^ ^^ i i : 5 r: r.; V.I .,.1 L: v.: r.i •J ^7* i:: r: ...1 2 0 5 2 0 ("J V . ' c: V . ' 2 0 5 ;u • • 1 HJ IL.I U>-k ;u ; u 1 '"•' i Li ;uX ;>KR H ' ; Li T 1 ' - . ' ' 11 ; u T ;u ;u ;u :u3- ;u ;u ' I ' 11-' ;L.I ', u VALID ATEj %U 1 0 / 9 : 302947 ;...0W C G N C WATER SENlVOL.AilLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET hWOOOA # ..ase M O . ;; i-ii...i'i Lab Name: !;Jj:;V.!3!:ll.iL.i>QUI]i a I: I Code: GyL£ Lab Sample ID: WAAOOl Lab File ID: SV|x!i^iA01L. Saiii\j 1 e vo 1 uune: .1-..00.0 ((ii].) C o n c e n t r a t e d E::Xtract Volum I n j ecticiri Volume:; l..;:.P ( u l ) Contract: SAS Wo.: ! nr.r, ( u l ) CA8 C0i';l-'0i...;|;D 8;'--i-66--2 •• 0 ( . ' b ^ - /'•..::!^-3- 8 6 - 7 3 - 7 •1 .'••.(•v-..,:'^^: . . . A I " • • ; ' ^ i ; : . - % _ j ' . . . • ' , ' . : ^ • : : > • ' : ) . . . ±2'.0-'\ . 1 . •. - 2 :. • V•••• i.':i. I'l X 'i. roF>I'Iei"i<;>.!. _., - -l- -" N i 1 1 " o IJ i'I ((v ;'i >.:> 1 - - D i i; > e !••! X o'f y.y r a !"i — 2 ., 4^'i:':i. i'. :i. 'F. ro'l.o:!. u e i i e " !.>:!. (X' 1.'. hiy'.1. |-| I I't ha.:. a 'Le —'!• - C; "I::. o y" o p l"i e! I y :i. "- p i'l e n y :i. e 't h e i' — F'].I..I.OI"Oi'ie _ _. - -4 •••••• i •Lroai'i i 1 j.rie _. —- 4 ., 6 - Lxi.n i t r o - 2 - I'ie^l:.Fiyl pi'ieruj.i. i-i - I'i i 1;. I •• o •:;:. o d i p !"i e n y 1 a in i r i •/:• ( 1 ) , - •- •! -B; I'^ofi'iC' i^ I'i e n / :i. -" p Fien y'.i. e x Fie i"... FieXa(;;I'l .1.o 1 "(xi.;:(:;'!"i Xei"ie - - -- F'ei'i ';..ar;!"i.! c;,!"•;:';:ii lei'io.l. _ -i-'I'lei'iai"!'LFii-e!"!e Ai'i 'I.iir a ' : - e - ' e _ D i ' " I "I — Bi^.^ '•:. y 1 p \"i 1.1 'i •:.. 1 a x e - F':', U(.:'r';;:ii'l.Fie:ie ---F'^/rene Date Received: 02/16/9 5 Date Extracted: 02/.20_/_95 Date Analy7:ed;; Q2/2ZZ2Sl D i 1 ".I 'L i c;i i"i F- a c: t o i - : ;L .^0 pt'lx ....Zr.Z CONCENT RAT:;:ON ( u g / L ) O t t I I , x:.-J , L; J - 3 ., J •" •••• I) :i. c t" 1 ]. o:" o i:> e i"i z x o i \"i ^•' I"!0'.'I'! A! O '.. <Vi. ; r 1;'i '.. I"i!"c!"!. c : t v I ' l i':': y.l i ' l i ' y ; ! : t;-;-'!'} <•.-.' — ' i ) " I ~ ' r". i:: .I'i'^'l n e x y l ) F' • : 1 '.. I I ' . A . I . <:<. I.. I 53-70-3'-'- 1 9 1 - 2 4 - 2 - "- yy.' ::;-ux - D :i. -11 - G r •[, y 1 !-• h t h a 1 a -1;. e Lie ;•! X o ( b ) r" 11 '.o r ari L Fie; i e B e i'i z o ( ':••') 1"' 1 LUJ r ai'i t i'i e i'i (•:• B e r i x o ( a ) P y r e ; ' i e . •••DJ. t.'Ori X ( an 11) An tli--ac;ei'ie •Beri x o ( vj ,, li., :i. ) l-'ei-ylc-MiO ( 1 ) -- C a n n o F. Ix :• • i-o(ii Dii;iiieri'y'l.aiii:i.lie r: I 2 0 ;u 1 l.l 1 ! I ;u i:: 1 :uT 5 ; u T 5 ; Li ; Li ; Li 1 Lc; Reviewed By Date VAlfDAT lo/v: 302948 LOW CONC. WFiTER SEr'iIVO:...ATxl...E ORGANICS A N A L Y S I S DATA SHEE l T E N T A T I V E L Y I D E N T I F I E D C011P0UND3 L a b N a m e : ETC/GU1...F SOUTH , a b C o d e : Gl,)IL,F... C a s e N o . : HLA_ ._ab Sa(;iple I D : WA.A00.1. LaF. F d ] e I D : CVWAAO.IIL. Sample volume: 1000 (iii:!. ) Coi'i c e n t r a t e d F;:x'L'a!-t Volume;; i.00;0_ I n j (0? c t i c m Vij :i i..i.(iie ;: _...„1..'..P ( u 1 ) Ccin tract: SAS No.; ul) MWOOOA SDG Wo.: 9502 Date Received: 02/16/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02.^127/95 D i 1 u t i o ri F" a c 't o r : 1.;. .0 l^'H: ....Zi;.Z ufiFxei- T I C s •f (.ii..iri';i;: L.!i--i;:::' N LI i'i Xi i::. rv Ci.Jrir-'O'JND isAi"' • li. J KNOWN ; :• .,1 ' - B 1 PHENYL RT E S T . CONC. (uci.-^L.) -:;;;:.:: • ; : ; : ; u : : ; : : - ; : - - ; : : - — : - : - 13 1 9; _ t '<:•: ' -•-•:~ z:: ; r j ; - HIM H.I^4 , VAl! DATED, Reviewed By Date •o;x:'i 1 i...csv-TTr 1 0 / 9 2 302949 .|- 1-1 Cji-irir L-i:i r-nj LOW CONC. WATER SEHIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: CIXL;^.y2:.;:;;E_.SQLJTH b Code: GULF Case No.: FILA.. Lab Samp].e ID: WAW0CX'L_ Lab File ID: SVWAl.^iOli... Sample v a 1 u m e ;; 6 9 0 ., (> (m :i.) Concentrated ti: x •;:. r <x (-1 Volume: 1.00Ci_ :i:i'i j ection Vi;>:i.un'e ;; \.-.0 ('..il) Con tr act: E)AS l"4i:i. MWOOO5 SDG No.: 95022 (ul) CAS NO,, 108 111-44-^"• 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-!• 106-44-5^ 621-64-7^ 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-7 5' 5-• 105-67-9 • 111-91-:; • 120-83-2 120-82-:i^ 91-20-3 106-47-8 87--68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6- / / ' — 4 X - • , ' . . •••• 88-06-2- 95-9 5 -•;•• 91-58-7' e8-74-'U- 131-11-3 20f!-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2- 83-32-9- Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/9 5 D i 1 u ': i on F-'a c: t o r : .1.»i) p;-!: 8 . 1 COi'iPOUND CONCEINTRATIOiS (uci/F.. i Q -—F''Fieri 0:1 1 — b i s ( 2 - C h r o r o e t x . y r ) Ethier__..__ 1 2 - C Fi 1 o 1" o p Fi e ri o 1 _ ', - - 2 - N e t i ' i y l p h e n o l . 1 --'•2 ,,2 ' — oxybii;:- (l-CFilcii^opi'oriarie).. 1 --4-NethylpFie:-M:>l [ •• -N-!-; X 'F. roi\.o"-Di-"n -"i-' i"o py :•. am i rie..._ 1 •—I-I e X a c ii 1 o;" o e •t Fi -a ri e . ' h; :i •[. y- o b e ri X e ri e I — .1 s o i'> I'i o I'- ci <"• e 1 2 "" F'^t i t r o p lie ri o :F I 2 ,, 4 -Didie'F.I'iyl pFieiio:!. ! F.'i^i {2! —i.;I'll01 "oe't^i'-iycy) T'le'tFiaiie 1 2 ,, 4 •••• D1 c Fi 1 o r <j p Fi (:;• n o :i. I ;u ; LI zr ; Li :u ; Li I I I I ' - ' ' ^ R 1 rt 2 ., 4—Tri CiFilciroixeii xerie __. 1-^ a;:;. i'i t Fi a :i. e i'i e - 4 -•• C I'i 1 o r o a r I i :i. :i. r i (x !• :eXac.h 1 oroIxu'F.ad i e ; i e 4-Grilor(;i-3^-rie'F. Fiy:i. pFieriCil 2 -11 e t I'l y :i. fi a p li t hi a 1 e i'i e l'!exacFi:i.c:ii"0(x/(:::i.operi 'lad i e r i e 2 , 4 , 6'-Tr i chlor(jph(Xi'io]. — 2 .; 4 ., 5-"Tri c F i l o r o p F i e n o l - •"• 2 •••• C |-i 1 o I" o ri a p li 1;. h a 1 e I'l e -- -2-"W:i.'troaiii 1 i n e _ . D :i. m e t I'i y 1 F' li 1: li a :i. a 'i. e A c: e n a p Fi 'i: Fi y 1 e ri e . . — 2 ., 6 - D i n i • t r i j t o l u e i i e _. ••• 3^-hli 'Fi-oari i 1 i i i e A (- e li a ]:) li [. lie n e H-i ; u 3- < i 1 : U J 1 1 I ; F.i : Li T ;uT 1 I I 1 ' • - ' ; LI ; u ;u :u Reviewed By Date V At.! DATE mf Ul 1 L.CSV-l 302950 -OW COr-iC. WATER SEi'ilVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET m L a b N a m e : ETC/GUI..F SQ'.ITF-! b C o d e : GUlJF. C a s e N o . : HI Lcib S a m p l e I D : WjAWOOl L a b F i l e I D : SyW.6.:^^;.O.0:..L S a t li );> 1 e v o l u m e : ^£>..::.!:1. ' J : ^ l ) C o n c e r i t r a t e d E ' x t r a c t Vixlume: 1(:K I n i e c t i oi'i Vo 1 L'.;ne : . . ..1..:;.0. ( LI. J.) L o n t r a c t : MWOOO; ( u l ) l..i-:o II'. 5 1 - 2 8 - 5 - 1 0 0 - 0 2 - 7 ^ 1 3 2 - 6 4 - 9 ^ CO'';F'i"i; SDG Ho . : 9 5 0 2 2 D a t e R e c e i v e d : 0 2 / 1 7 / 9 5 D a t e E x t r a c t e d : 0 2 / 2 0 / 9 5 D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 2 / 2 7 / 9 5 D ;i. ]. u t i ori F'a c: t o r : 1.-^ F'LI: ...C.jt^ CONCENTRATICiM ( u ( j / L ) Q •:. I . • - 14-2^ 2., 4 - Ixi.n i •Li'ixi'j'ieriC'l -4-F-l i t i-oi:) i i^-;'i i o 1 _ I'i !x(xri xo^t'urai 1 •2 ,, 4^-Diri i \.r o t(j :i.uene 7005—72 -•• 3 4 - 1 ; Fi :i. o r o ix i'i c r i y 1 — p ii e i'i y 1 e t i'i e i" l;:ii)—/x;x- / — F .l.i.,i.oi"ei"ie . _ 10 0 - 0 1 - 6 4 -l-i i t i^' o a li ;i :i. i ri e 5 3 4 - 52 ;:. 4 ,, 6-"D:!.i'ix •••: r ex- 2 - r'ie^v.;iyl pFiei^iol 8 6 - 3 0 - 6 - N-N;i. t r o;;;o('l x ;::F'i(:x"''yla!;i:i. rie ( 1 ) 1 0 1 ••• 5 5 - 3 •'—B roxici r. i'lori y :i. - p Fieri y l e •I. Fie ;•... 11Q••••".'4•••• 1 I^ieXaci'i:.,oi''o!;>en x c : n e li.-^'^ • 'Jb--':.< F-'C'i^i •F.a ;: Fi ,1.^^••opi^iorio:F i"'F:ei'i ar^i tlii ' e ; ' : e 12!"".''— — i^'it'i '•:. F i r ^ a c ' e i i c _ '•V •••• /;:! - i..^':.. •••• i'i •— Bi I..'. "L '•/•*•.;, ix Fi 'L I'i ••:*. 1 a 'F e _ 4 4 - ( i i-hi. u c i r a r i " F r i ( X i i e . --:'•••• /'••••- j;.;i..i •r y .i. i-ie;i X y . r:. ii 'F l i a . i . a ' x e •'•i"- .1. .:.'!., ..x ••-1>i.'.'.'.li F ( j r o b e n x ;i.o 'i.cte 1 1 7 - 8 4 - 0 - 2 0 5 - 9 9 - 2 - 2 0 7 - 0 8 - 9 - hCii- rx2--8 . 1 . • / %..•, " - \ . > •/• — x . l ^ * 5 3 - 7 0 - 3 - - 1 9 1 - 2 4 - 2 - ( 1 ) - F::ani-iO'l: FJ -!..; I i V yc> e I'i e . _ _ ;^ _ - - - h i s ( 2 - E t h y 1 Fiexyl ) F ' n t h a l a t e . . J . . ' . 1 . — I 1 • - I . . . I I... I . y .1. I I I ' . . I I-:;, .1. •:.'- 1..I.V.' _ _ - Bi'Xii 7.C '.. \ ' ) F-Fi. u i j i ' a r i t r i e i i e Bieii x(j ( Fx) i' :F (.1 •ji^x..i^; FI lixiie - B e r i x(x ( a ) F-'/r' erivx :Fiidei'i(j ( 1 ., 2 ,, :3 ""cx:! ) l - ' y i ' e i ' i e . - I ' i Fieri x ( a ., l i ) Fui l;. F i i - a c e i i o - - - B o j i 7.C! C (:) ., 11.. I, ) r'Xxi y l e r i e ^•;x i ' j a i ^ ' a F e d ••r;^^x;,iri D i p Fieri y l a m i . l i e V :"riF 'I .1 L..L..;-,v' Reviewed By Date _ \V,T / -! 7 "7 • ^ < ! > .. / ~7 / • ' 7 1 LI ; LI ; u ;'u : Li ; LI ; I...1 : 1..; ' '" 1 ' i 1 7 _., /' / • " / • 7 7 I L.I ;u : 1 i ;uT : i-J J - lU ;u I I I ;u ,D ^rM^ ^jf<^ 302951 .1. L..l.,r' LOW.CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENT AT IVEL Y I DENT I F I ED COMF'OLINDS Lab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTF! ij C o d e : GUL..F Case N o . : HL.A_ L a b S a m p l e I D : Wji:^;'J001 Lati F i l e I D : SVWAW.O;C S.am!:j:i.e volumv.:': pj^Q..:;.S- ( m l ) C o r i c o n t r a t e d E : : x t r a c t VOII.K^KX ;: 1.000 1 I'l .i e c. t :i. c n V i x 11 .i iii e : 1 „ 0 (i..( 11 Contract: SAS -Wo. : (ul ) t_|-'A bi'-if'lr'L-t- r-iU, MWOOO; SDG Wo„: 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 D a 1:.e An a ]. y z e<J: 02/2 D i :i. u t i ofi r"a c t o r :; 1_._0_ i::.!^!: 8 .. 1 *-. /O""' ''O '•• "rouric:;; L.ri-:- !-::...h COi'lF'OLL-lD F^i ; Fl:-!K^ ::iWr! RT EST. CONC, (Uy/L) .^.1. T-' ;..iM Reviewed Date .B.X^|ig&0 FOFi;l''l I F..CSV-TTC :i 0 / 302952 i.-_i^ 1-1 Oi-ti ir L-c. IS,. LOW CONC, WATER SEI^IVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET L a b N a m e : CIil/j3l:J.LiI.....SQi,j;ij;j. b Code: [ M Z Case No,: HrJL Lab Sample ID: WAW00.5 Lab File ID: ^> M^ A W.0.5 L _ GatnpIe v o :i.'..v(lie ;; .LO00 (in I ) C o r i c e r i t r a t e c i F-:xtrac'F h'olrime;; 1 0 0 0 1„0 Cul) Contract: SAS -No. : MWOlOl SDG Wo. : 950: (ul) C A S i'^'O (:::!::ji'iF-'Oi..ii"-iD Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 D i ]. u 't i Ci ri F" a c t o r : l^.S) pi'l: _..8_..2 COWCEFITRATION (u(:j/L) 0 i 0 3 - 9 5 - ' 2 — - F''lie;^io:i. . _ _ 1 1 1 1 - 4 4 - 4 - - - b i s v 2 - C h l o r o e t h y l )i:^ther \ '.••' I' — 5 X — 8 ;;:: •• C Fi :i. o r^ c p Fi e n cj :i. . _. . . \ - 2 •••• i'l e 'F li y 1 p h e ri (i 1 1 - 2 . 2 ' - t i x y b i s ( l - C h l o r ( ; i p r o F > a r i e ). 1 •••'•X^^I'i.;•;•>'Fi'iy.l jjhierio.l _ _ . . 1 (..Ji-v- 6(..> " j. — 1 0 6 - 4 4 - 5 6 2 1 - 6 4 - 7 . 6 7 - 7 2 - : . - r-,,;;;....,;:;, iv . . . ••.- .... |-.|.... |-,| j .-y |. • ^.j c:.,-; — '£i I — [-1 . - p i - ,-, r , y j -, ;|, j f, ,\;i ^ •-l'i(xx: a (- I'i .1. o i ' o e t |-ia;'i e •••• I i': t r o ixeri 7 e n e_ _ - .1. :Xc> p Fio I''ori e F'l^ 8: ci; 1 • 2 6 '"/ 8 1. • ' • •> . 1 . ^^c "}^: '/ " ;2' 06^^ - / . ' I . . . " .L J - 9 ( -•2x' 0 9 - •~" ' 7 t . , 2 - - , / • ; „ . . . . ' • ' ; • _ . . . . . • - 8 - • - 2 - ***;. .9 •2: „ 4 - L I i fiie \. I'i y l ;:> !'ie;-i d 1 • ix;i. X ( 2!-(.iii.1. o!' oex.Ficxx / } i'.(x F. i'iarie_ " 2 , 4 - D i c Fi 1 o I' o p i'i e n 0 \ " :i ., 2!.. 4"' f r ' i c:li.' o'-ciFien x e i i e • | i . : ' . L ' l 1 I.. I I ••:'..I. I.-..'I |ir.-.- • 4-^ r;:;-i;i r>r^<:;iari i :F :i.i e -F^iOx: acFilorobu.'i'.<;i.d x e x i e - 4 ••CFilorci-3^-F1etiiylpFieri(xl_... -.':'..•••• i''!e Fi'iy .1.ri api'i Fli.7\ . 1 . o n e . _ • •• Ix/Xac;Fi.i.(xr^oeye.i.expoxri •Fac,;;.(xiie. -'2 ,, 4 ., 6'"T r i (;: i'i 1 o rxx jx i'i(Xi"i'(:j 1 _ - 2:., 4 ., 5 -" 1' r i c Fi :i c> \~ c> p Fi e r 1 o 1 - /."" r.i li 1 (j 1" o I'i a p i'i':. n a .i. e n e •'••2— F-li tl "c;>xi.ri i :F i r i e _ -B :i,(ne t h y 1 F h t l i a l a t e ""I'-iixeriap'ii FFiy'J.erie. ""2 ,, 6 —Dili 1 •Fro'F(x:i.ue!'ie " Fi- iFi. Fi'tixiri li. ]. j . n e . "!• I (-.(xi'i aiv.i I'i F Fieix (x 5 10 J - 5 1 LI tr 1 1 1 5 : u XI (X; ;u r\ 7 ' ,1 u T ' i ^ ^ R : ; u J ; I '••-' 1 1 Li ; ; 0 X ; ' 1 i ' to ; H.J X ; '. F.i 1 ; u ; u 1 i^ORFi 1 I...C Reviewed By Date VALIDATE l ^ p ^ 302953 ..UW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLA FILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I'lWOlOl # ab Name: ETC/GULF SOOTFI •i.b Code: GULF C a s e Flex. : F-iF. (2oii t i ' - a c t : SAS H o . : D S a m p l e I D : WAW00 5 LaF) F i l e IDs SVWAWO'xL S a m p l e v o l u m e : .lj50_0 (nFF) C o n c e n t r a t e d E;;X t r a c t Veil ume;; 1.00.0 I n j e c. t i on Vo ]. uiiie : 1 „ C ( u ].) ( u l ) CAS NO. cr:ii\i-'Oi..JND SDG N o . : 9 5 0 2 2 D a t e R e c e i v e d : 0 2 / 1 7 / 9 5 D a t e E x t r a c t e d : 0 2 / 2 0 / 9 5 D a t e A i ' i a l y z e d : 0 2 / 2 7 / 9 5 D :i. ]. u 't i oI'i F''a c t o i": 1 . 0 |i>H: ...<;L.J2 COFICENTF<ATION (ua/i_.) 8 1 0 0 - 0 2 - - 7 ..r -•• - " . / ..-, r - , . 1 . • . . : • . ' . : . • - < : ; • ' • • . • - • • . ' ' 7 0 0 5 - 7 2 - 3 - ••• 2'., 4 - Dir^: j. t ror'i'ieriol -'•v-F-i :i. •Fr"(ji:) iiori (X1 D;:. Ixeri x(x^rurari _ 2:,, 4 -D ili i Fi-oto 1 u e r i e • - F>i (•:•• I.liy:i pi I Fria 1 aX.e 'v—i..;li 1 o'<"c>pFieny .1. — piieii y .\.(x cFiei" 100—0:F — 6 4•• • !-l:! 11-oali 1 ]. iri(x 52:i4 ••Fi2^ 1—- 4 ,, 6":Dii'i ;i 'ti"0" 2—i'ietFiy:!, i:i! ieric;FF & 6—3 0—6 Fi •• • F-l i'i. i-^ o s (X -i i p 1 i c: li y '.\. a i li :i. ri e (:i.) j.c.1.••• 5a- ,x '-x Fiixxiiiox :'ic:i:\''/1-• pFieri^v'l.e FFiec ii. 1B—74 — 1 -•••• i'l(••'Xacb 1 (ji•• (JiJc:n zerie 8 /' - 8 6 - 5 F'x....! 1 X a <:: li :i. < :• r o p '•: i e ri (x 1 ?:; 5 '" 0 X - G - — !-• l i e i^i a ix F i i i'' e !x ;x il. '2.\}~' 12i'" / — i'iri 'i.. Fi ;"a ("eri(x F;••••••• 7 A - - 2 B'\•••• i'i ""Bu. Fy 1 ixFitli.x.:i.a F e 2'('•'.2"'44""0 F'Fi.uc>;•"vx!'i 'F11c:\'\e i;. .:• r: r-....-;' ''.'. •' •">.... I'X •! .... ''.'^ 2 1 7 - 8 1 - 7 — 1 1 7 - 8 4 - 0 20 7 - 0 8 - 9 - — I'i •'•'*.:.... ~ ' {'\ "•"' _ . . 1 9 1 - 2 4 - 2 ( 1 ) - Cai'ino F ix 1 X.'l I i.v,' , " Bi'..i. xy::. Fieri z y l p"i'F;'ia:i.a 'Fe _ 1 •"•x ,, -•> •{'>').. r F i l o ; - o i x e r i X :i.d J.lie , ••• .'.•; (!•' I'i X (!> ( c . \ i Fi i'i i fi t" a (- (X i' i e "F: ii I"'/x;-one ' 1 " r^:!. x ( .!:!"'•;::. lFiy 1 liexy.1. ) I-'ii Fi'ia.i.a r e _ • • I:' X - !'i - 0 0 F y 1 I--1-1 F I-1 a:;. a F e \ -BixM'ixot Ix) r ' l u o i ^ " a r i •Frie;"ie -FiiXi'i XC' ( ' x ) \" :i.i..i.(j i-ai'i t i^ioixe — Bv./!^; X tx \, ri ') r'''v'•••'orie - : i : r i d e i i ( X ( 1 „ 2 H 3 - c d ) !••• ••/1 .;x;ie - F ' i FiX'ii X ( X ,, !•') i^iiii F i ' i i ' a r i e i ' i e — i..x::,ri v-1-;, ( q .1 |-|,, i ) F ' e r y :i. (Xi'i (X _ . e;xxi 1'xi.•Fed "Fi^-ofii D i i x i ' ^ ^ e i i y x F a f r i r i o Reviewed By Date F-T:iFi:f'i :F L . C : 2 0 20 5 i:: r:_ .'.i lUX ;u : F.i 1 1 1 1 ' - . ' , F.I ' \\ ; F.I 1 t.i ; F J ', F.l ; FJ 1 Li ; F.I 1 FJ F I T 5 1 Fi J" 5 ; u 5 : i..i - . ' ' I 5 11.) • 5 ;u IS : FJ ^lcp. l4/ild=o 302954 ,.nw CONC. WATER SiFi'HVOL.ATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ETF:/GFiF.i- SOFHH. >ab Code: GULF L_ab Sample ID: Lab File ID: Sample volume;: Concentrate;.! E. In i e c t i o n ''.•'ij:i.u C a s e N o . : HF..i^:: WAWO c..ilf-'li.l.|i..)Xii... '00 (Iii 1 ) .cF Volufxe: K:'0.0.. 2 . O ( u 1 ) Contract SAS --Wo,. •.u.l } MWOlOj SDG No.: 95022 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/9.5 D i :i. II. X i o ri F-' a c 't o r': 1... .0^ FsFi: ._3..:Z -li_imixer TICx;. 'I'ljun CAS WtJi-'iBEFi: 4 . 5.. CO:'iPOi..l;'!D NAME ;-•:.'xxxn;.. BF,i'.;ZF:::^' i ii'-F-:F-iOu. I;E!-i:Fr:,l „ -E"TFF'i'2.. -:;nETHAF7:t C ACID., C ACID.. :.. , -F^iET [••lY! — F'^i-i.T 1-1 Yl...— - • F i E ' r w r F . - |:;.-|- 1 1 . 09 .' '", '", rr . 1 . .•::. . / . : . -..I •I o • - : ' • - . ;;GT ., CONC,. ( u a / L ) Q J si J hi JhJ Reviewed By Date f-OFi:i'x 1 T IC •iO/'- 302955 h.OW COF-IC. WA'i:ER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET # Lab Name: ETiT/GFL^^£_j;:>yFn;ji Contract: Code: GULF Case No..: HLA SAS -Wo.: RBGW02 SDG Wo.: 95022 ..ab Sample ID: ^.14^0.0:2 F..aF. File ID: C\^WA.W0.2L...._ Sample volume: IQOO . (ml) Conceritrated Extract V(jlume: l.QOO, 1 n :i e c t i ori V(J :I. u m e •; 1 ., 0 ( u :i.) (u 1) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 Dilution Factor: A,J.S> PH: 8.2 CAS NO 108-95-2- lll-44-'<-^ 95-57-8 95-48-7— :i 0 8 - 6 0 - x! - 106-44-5- 621-64-7- '• — ' _ " 7 '-I 'I 98-95-3 .' (:;.• ,.< 7 il. 88-75-5 10 5-67-9 111-91-1- 120-83-2- 120-82- !• 91-20-3 :l 06-47-8^ 87-6FF-:x-• 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4- 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 • 2\:>S—'~>6—&- 606-20-2^ 99-09-2- COMPOUND Pheriol..._ .._. — ixi.s ( 2—CFilcr(xe'Fhy'l )E'Fh(Xi'' -2i^ • '...i Fi .1. o r"0 fj Fien ci j. 2-i'ietFiyl p h e n o l - - 2 .,2 ' - o x y b i s ( 1 - C F i l o r o p r o p a r i e ) ---4•• • Me Fliy:i. pb&no]. ; •!-l-] 1 -F r cic>o—D :L — ri -F-' i-o i:;.y 1 ani i ri e i^leX a(-Fi 1 o r o e t h a n e I'-I i t r (X t:i e ri z e ri e - 1 -x (J j J i'i o r on e - -2-'N i 'F r o p l'i(xri o'}. _ 2 ., 4-• Diriiexh•/1 ixiierio 1 __ - :xis (2-CFi 1 orc^e tlicxxy) MetFiarie 2 ., 4—Di cli 1 o r o p l i e n o ] . _ - 1 ,, 2:,, '1 - T r i c Fi 1 (x r o Ix i;x ri z e ri e i'-l a p Fi 'F FI a l e li e -4 -1; FI :J. O r oa'111 i n e -i"l(x X ^1 c hi 1D r c t'u 'F Ad i er'i (x -"- 4••• C:;111 <:;,|-rr-3—Mexliy:i. pi'ierici:i. - ••" 2 •••• FI e •F Fiy :i. Pi a p Fi F ii a :i. e li e - F'iexacFFF or'ocyc:loperi'tad iene 2 ,, 4 ., 6 - 1 ' r i c h ]. o i" (x p Fi e r i o ]. - 2 ., 4 ,, 5-"rri. c ! ' i l o r o p F i e n o l _ - - —2—F' Fi 1 (Ji-oriap!i FFia 1 erie 2 - FI :• t r o a li i :i. i ri e _ .; _ _ _ D i. (li (X F Fi'y 1 I-' 1 i F Fi a 1 a t e _ - A c::ei i a p Fi t Iryx en e_.. _ _ — 2 ,,6—Din i 'i:r(X'F(jluei'ie _ -- - i:;'^^F!i •Fr^oari i :i. t r i e - i'i c(xii .xp Fi'F lie i'i (X COWCEWT (Li.g./ RATIOF L) r: '5 ^=1 n: c: '5 ^'i Q ;u : F.1 J - IFl 1 I ( ;u 1 F) '. l.l lU 1 F.I II ;u :uT i:: ' ' L* R. :uT ;u I I I t '•••' ;u ; F.I ;u T : 0 ; F.l ; i..i ', FI 1 l.l VAIIDATE CFiV-l Reviewed By Date 302956 LOW CONC, iJ-AlER 8EFrFV0i..AFIl...E ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SFIEET L a b N a m e : ETC/GULF SOlJTl^l # \b C o d e : GL1L£. C a s e N o . : HLA. l a b S a m p l e I D : WAW0.02 L a b Fi:i.e I D : SyWi:i.W0.2L Sam '{.I J. e v o 1 ume : .i;.O.QO (iii 1 ) Coi'i (::en'ti'"a'Fed E::xtra(::t Vi-ilruiie;; 1.0O.0_ In j &c X :i (xri V. . 1 i..i.(;i(x : 1 .. O ( u :i. ) C o n t r a c t : SAS -Wo. : RBGWO: SDG N o . : 9 5 0 2 2 ( u l ) CAS hlC, ; 8 ' « - 6 6 - 2 ; 70C •' . / .<: " " : " > " ; , 1 0 0 - 0 1 - I r : - ; ; ^ . ^ , . „ t : : ' • ; . I • . . ' - . . ' "V • . . ' . - ; . . ; 8 6 - 3 0 -^ ; iioi-::^5 ) J ^ ,—, • • - . .•. , .1. . I . O - / -^ I f " ' " ' . ' . . r • • ••• , . r':rii''iixo! i;,;o —/:',, 4^'D.1.ri X Xr'Cip-'lerio.i._ .... ^.:..-: ; .| ;, [ |.- ( j I;;, \) i:\ j - , (-, I D X i:.' e I'i X i-j -(• u r a I' I. . -2'., 4 - D i i ' i i t r o t o l r ^ e r i e Fi' X e F Fiy :i. p ii •F F'a 1 a t e -4•••• C; 1 i:i.orc.<piief:'/:i. - p l i e l i y 1 e t h e i " " i-21. i..iv:.i! " e i i e ••'—iii Fi-txaii i 1 n.iie - 4 ,, 6^'Dii;:,. •tr C)-2—i'leFFiy]. .viFieiiol !2-l^hi .Fi'oxvod i pi'i'xn'y :i.ai;iirie ( 1 ) , '-v "Bi i "(:,i(ii('; p Fieri yxF -- (X iieii '•v'.i. e 'F le i" '••-^••;,;x X x>, ci'i .1. Ci i "(x De-'^ x (xi^i (x X'(xi' i •". X'. c.!": .L ex (•"Ci ;',i t'leri c* .i. i' liixii a n "F i'i i - tx ix e Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/95 Dilutiori Factor: 1.0 li'l'l il ...B..:;.^: CONCENTRATION ( u c / L ) Q A : . ' . . ' ' . I . ^ . ' , - - I K I ^ . l l ! •:!. i...i::;l I ' : - .:1...74—2 T) i •II ••B^.( Fx':!. I'JI x •F. i ix> l a Fe i X r , r . : . , l - \ •!•. l - . w f i I I " / . . I•.•• . 1 . . 1 . .••• • • • • ( : : , . 1 . •••• / • 1 1 7 - 8 4 - 0 -:•/••,'" o c . ....'•:•. ix X. 'L y •!. ii>e ri x y .i. p i'i i;. Fia .i. a 'i.e :2 ,, 2>' ' D'}.. c F'l :i. o c o F> e ri z ;i. d 2 n e i.iei'i X t'j ( x,) Ari 'F I'll"ac;erie _ i::;i'ii "y;;i(Xi'ie i:.o -B ( 2-'t::'Fi'i'y'j. i'ie>;y:i. ) F-'ii F F i a l a F e Fxi. •• I •, - 0 c t y :i. i"' li t I'i a:!. a F e F'en X o ( Fi) F 1 (.i.oi"x..!'i F Fieri e 1 A'.O ! 2 0 7 - 0 8 ; 50"-32-'8 Beri x(x ( a ) F-'yrexe. I H / " , • ' . • ' ' . - ^ f - l f : •• ,. . . I ' .1 ••••, -.• . . . . . 1 "v ,•• , I •.> . . > ^ x . : , •/ — ,.i - 1.1 11..' (•.•! I I.J I .1. ., ..::. ., , j • !...(.: ; i • -/ r '.•.-.•I i -- F'i Fiixi'i X I. a ., li) A:i 'V. I'i i''a iXixn (X 19.1. "•'2.''\- " 2 • ( ' . ' I ( • • I I . , . 1 . ,' I • ^ . : : ( 1 ) •- F'Xi.l'il'iO'F Ix ' I"(..I(li i , ' ;i. o:'!(•;•.'I'i y ' . 1 . a ( l i . i . l i (x Date F..CSV 2 0 : F.l J ' 20 ;u tr. ! ! 1 ^ 1 , ' . . 1 5 ;u L : I T •..' I ',-,' 5 ;u 5 ; F. 20 ; u 20 '. U ;u ) 1 t 1 ' • • • ' ; Fj I > - ' 1 1 1 5 ;HT 5 :u 5 ;u c : I I I , L.l 5 ; F ; T 5 \ F) r: 1 1 1 ;u I 1 I I '•••' : F.l ; F! Reviewed By Q ^ ^ ^ / r ? 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 302957 L..OW CONC- WATER SEFllV(:tL..ATILE ORGANICS A N A L Y S I S DATA SFILET • ' T E N T A T I V E L Y I D E N T I F I E D COMPOUNDS L a b N a m e : E T C / G U L i " SOFITF! I k a b C o d e : GULJF C a s e Flo..: HLA.. i_ab Sample ID: yiiW0.02 L a b F ; i l e I D : SVWAW02L ia.iTipile 'v'Ci l u m e : J.OOCJ (ml.') In.;i e(;: t i o l i Vo 1 u m e : .0 ( u l ) Contract: SAS No.: RBGWO: SDG No.: 95022 (ul) Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/27/9 5 D :i. :i. u l. i o n F"a c 'to i-: J^...0_ pi-i; ...3..Z WumFier i I C s T O U P I CAS FF,!i-'iBE!-i. OMr'i...l, •'I...' rii-ii'ir... P. I E S T . COisC, ( U Q / L ) Reviewed By Date J ^ ^ ^ ^ tp£l FORM I l...CSV-T]:r 302958 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis Case Number: Site: Contractor Lab: Validator: QC Reviewer: Sample Matrix: 95022 Project Number: Island Chemical Company Pace Incorporated, New Orleans Kirsten Meier O^KuU^ut/T^, ; ^ < 1 ^ Validation Date: Review Date: Water 29872 10.1 11 April, 1995 H-n-9r Analytical Method: SW 846, Method 8270, Pyridine only Sample Designations: Client ID (Lab Sample ID) MW0004 MWOOOl MW0005 M WO 101 RBGW02 MW0003 Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [x] Acceptable for use as qualified [ ] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The investigative samples were validated in accordance with the "USEPA CLP National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review", February 1994. bra.clcc.ll 12291994 1530 Form BNA l.l 302959 Cue Number: 95022 Proje«Number: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Ubivl Cbcmiod Cofnpany DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary x_ X Case Narrative Surrogate Recovery Summary MS/MSD Summary Reagent Blank Summary GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary Sample Data NA Chain of Custody Forms Holding Times Organic Analysis Data Sheets Quantitation Reports Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Mass Spectra Printouts TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data *_ Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports * Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data * Calibration Summary x Standards Quantitation Reports * Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms * Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data X DFTPP Mass Spectra X Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X DFTPP Mass Listings bta.clec.ll 12291994 1530 3 0 2 9 6 0 Form BNA 1.1 Ca»= Nimber: 95022 ProjeaNumbcr: 29872 10.1 Site ID; Island Cbemical Cocnpany Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts NA TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data * Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample NA Organic Analysis Data Sheets NA Quantitation Reports NA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms NA Mass Spectra Printouts NA TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Comments: For the instrument C the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms showed peak areas from the scan 350 and higher, while the compound of interest. Pyridine, appears at aproximately scan 210. A visual comparison of data for Pyridine was not possible. bm.elec.ll 12291994 1530 3 Form BNA 1.1 302961 Case Number: 95022 ProjeclNumbcr: 29872 10.1 Site ID: Isbmd Chemical Company SPECIHC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Were custody transfers correctly and completely documented? Yes[x] No Comments: None Holding Times Were sample extractions performed within holding times? Yes No[x] Were sample analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: The investigative sample MW(XX)3 was re-extracted outside hold time to evaluate surrogate recoveries. For the report, the original sample was used and qualification of data was not necessary. Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Were samples analyzed within the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? Yes[x] No Comments: None bra.elec.ll 12291994 1530 4 Form BNA l.l 302962 Case Number: 95022 PiojectNumber: 29872 10.1 Site ID: Island Chemical Company Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? Yes[x] No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes No[x] Did the initial calibration meet the minimum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument C do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered or affected the quantitation of the target analyte Pyridine, cannot be evaluated. The concentrations of the initial and continuing standards are listed in the header as twice as high as the concentrations used in the quantitation section of the data. The injection volume is not clearly defined, but appears, that the same amount of 1.0 ul was used for standards and samples. Since no detections of Pyridine were reported, no qualification of data is necessary. In the initial calibration on 2-20-95, Instrument C, the percent RSD for pyridine was 33.721, exceeding the limit of 30.0%. Therefore, positive detections would be qualified as estimated (J). However, no positive detections for Pyridine were reported and qualification of data was not necessary. Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes No[x] Did the continuing calibration meet the minimum RRF criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. Several continuiog calibrations exceeded the QC limit of 25%. See table "Continuing Calibration Summary" for samples and associated qualifiers. As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument C do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered or affected the quantitation of the target analyte Pyridine, cannot be evaluated. bro_elec.ll 12291994 1530 5 . __ _ Form BNA 1.1 302963 Case Number: 95022 PiojectNumber: 29872 10,1 Sile ID: Isbmd Chemical Company Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveries within acceptance limits? Yes[x] No If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No NA[x] Comments: None Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample delivery group (SDG)? Yes[x] No Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: The matrix spikes were performed \yith a 8270 mixture, which does not include Pyridine. The lab provided a summary of matrix spike recoveries, some recoveries were not within 8270 QC limits. No qualification of data. Internal Standards Were the internal standard areas and retention times within the required limits? Yes[x] No If the internal standard requirements were not met, were the samples reanalyzed? Yesx[x] No NA Comments: No internal standard area and retention time summaries were provided. The associated peak responses were compared and the QC criteria were met. No qualification of data. 302964 biD.elec.ll 12291994 1530 6 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: 95022 PiDJedNumber: 298T2 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company Blank Analyses Were the appropriate number of blank analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were analytes detected in the blanks? Yes No[x] If analytes were detected in the blanks, were the same analytes detected in the associated investigative samples? Yes No NA[x] Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes No[x] Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. The target analyte was not detected in the associated prep blanks and qualification of data was not necessary. Laboratory Control Samples Were laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses performed at the correct frequency? Yes No NA[x] Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? - Yes No NA[x] Comments: Not applicable. bra.elec.ll 12291994 1530 7 Form BNA l.l 302965 Case Number: 95022 ProjeclNumbcr: 29872 10.1 Site ID: bland Chemical Company Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes No[x] Were mass spectra provided for the target analytes detected in the investigative samples? Yes No NA[x] Were the mass spectra of acceptable quality and analytes correctly identified? Yes No NA[x] Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (RRTs) acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument C do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered with or affected the quantitation of the target analyte. Pyridine, cannot be evaluated. Therefore, the reported result for Pyridine in the investigative sample MW0004 was qualified as estimated (J). Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identified compound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? Yes No NA[x] Were non-target peaks evaluated as required? Yes No Were the TIC mass spectra, searches, identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? Yes No Comments: Not applicable. bm.elec.ll 12291994 1530 8 Form BNA l.l 302966 Case Number: 95022 ProjeclNumber: 29872 10.1 Site ID: Island Chemical Company Log Books Were sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No NA Were sample analyses properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Comments: On the Form I for the investigative samples RBGW02 and MW0003, the prep date was entered as 2- 02-95, which is incorrect; the correct date is assumed at 2-20-95. The raw data (chromatogram) for the investigative sample MW0003, 2-27-95, is incorrectly listed as WM003. No qualification of data. 302967 bna.elcc.ll 12291994 1530 9 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: 95022 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ED: Island Chemical Company Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning m/z of 127, 2-20-95, 9:31, Instrument C Relative Abundance: 616 X 100 = 50.57% 1218 Initial Calibration Std 50, 2-2-95, Instrument H, D5-Phenol RRF: 52223 * 20 = 1.5037 27784 X 25 %RSD: 0.0687 *100% = 4.6137 1.4892 Continuing Calibration Std 50, 2-23-95, 14:56, Instrument H, Pyridine RRF: 77237 X 20 = 1.4697 42043 X 25 %D: 1.01438- 1.46968 x 100 = -44.88 % 1.01438 Surrogate Recovery , MWOOOl, 2-Fluorophenol 151425 x20 = 46.5042 51376 X 1.26758 46.50 X 100 = 62.0 % recovery 75 boj.elcc.ll 12291994 1530 1 0 Form BNA 1.1 302968 Case Number: 95022 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company Matrix Spike Recovery Detected concentrations not known RPD: Batch 12244, Phenol 2 I 83 - 80 I = 3.6810 I 83 + 80 I Sample Results CRQL: Water sample Detected Result: No detection TIC Result Not required bra.clec.ll 12291994 1530 1 1 Form BNA 1.1 302969 Case Number: 95022 ProjeclNumbcr: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Islar^l Cherrucal Company HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM LO O to, V] O Sample Identification Date Sampled Date Prepared Date Analyzed Prep. Holding Time Analysis Holding Time Qualifier Comments: None bi«_clco.l 1 12291994 1530 12 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: 95022 ProjeclNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chenucal Company INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time 1 2-20-95 Instrument C Analyte Pyridine • RF RSD 33.721 Samples Affected MW0004 Qualifier J/- to o to Comments: None bf«_clccl I 12291994 1530 13 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: 95022 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIHCATION SUMMARY FORM 1 Date/Time 1 2-23-95, 14:56 1 2-24-95, 10:59 1 2-27-95, 14:16 Instrument H H H Analyte Pyridine Pyridine Pyridine RF %D 44.88 40.74 31.44 Samples Affected MWOOOl, MWOlOl MW0005, RBGW02 MW0003 Qualifier J/UJ J/UJ J/UJ - CO o to vo -J to Comments: None bru clcc.l 1 12291994 1330 14 Form UNA I. Case Number: 95022 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID Analyte \ Blank Result (units) Action Level Associated Samples 1 Comments: None to o to vo lo bru elco.l 1 12291994 1530 Fonn UNA 1.1 Case Number: 95022 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.1 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company Simunary and Conclusions The analytical results for Pyridine are acceptable for use as qualified. The reported results for Pyridine in the investigative sample MW0004 was qualified as estimated (J) since a visual comparison of the peak acquisition was not possible. The results for Pyridine in the investigative samples MW0003, MWOOOl, MWOlOl, MW0005, and RBGW02 were qualified as estimated (J) due to exceeding continuing calibration criteria. Validator's Signature: j o ^ U ^ H u ^ t / Validator's Initials: /{ M Validation Date: L{~\[- ^ S QC Reviewer's Signature: ^^^u.o^k.t/' ^ y^.A'^'CCc,^ QC Reviewer's Initials: H P f Review Date: V- / J ~ f s ~ bcB.elec.ll 12291994 1530 1 6 Form BNA 1. 302974 EMVtnONMENTAL UkBORATOMES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organtcs by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0004 Description: NA Sample ID: WAA-001 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/14/95 Received: 02/16/95 Prepared: 02/17/95 Analyzed: 02/21/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 U2 ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. VALIDATED Reviewed By 1 ^ ^ - ^ ^ kiA'ly^ Date ^ - I I ' ^ S 201 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 SL Rose. U 70087 TEL: 504-469-0333 FAX: 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 302975 _ I N C O R P O R A T E D ENVIRO»4yENTAL LABOflATOmES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0005 Description: NA Sample ID: WAW-001 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/15/95 Received: 02/17/95 Prepared: 02/20/95 Analyzed: 02/24/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) (Bl) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 15.1 U J ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. (Bl) A reduced sample aliquot was extracted. The detection limit has been elevated accordingly. Reviewed By VALIDATED Date 202 161 James Drive West. Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL: 504-469-0333 FAX; 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 302976 'I'TK' I N C O R P O R A T E D ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATOmES REPORT OF UBORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: RBGW02 Description: NA Sample ID: WAW-002 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/15/95 Received: 02/17/95 Prepared: 02/02/95 Analyzed: 02/24/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 U3 ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. Reviewed By VALIDATED Date q ~ ( ( ' 1 ^ 203 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL: 504-469-0333 FAX: 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 302977 'l^iK' I H C O f l P O R A T E O ENVmONMEHTAL LABORATOmES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0003 Description: NA Sample ID: WAV-003 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/15/95 Received: 02/17/95 Prepared: 02/02,03/01/95 Analyzed: 02/27,03/03/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. P a r a m e t e r Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) (DI) Sample Blank Detection Limit 110-86-1 Pyridine ND ND 10.0 0 3 ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. (DI) Sample required re-extraction (and/or re-analysis) due to surrogate recoveries outside the QC limits. Re-analysis yielded similar results, indicating a sample matrix effect. The results reported are from the original analysis. Reviewed By Date . — VAL) DATED, ^ - l l ~ 1 5 204 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 Si. Rose, LA 70087 TEL: 504-469^)333 FAX: 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 302978 IiT^' I N C O R P O R A T E D ENVIRONMENTAL LABOMATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOOOl Description: NA Sample ID: WAW-004 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/19/95 Received: 02/17/95 Prepared: 02/20/95 Analyzed: 02/23/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No, 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 U3 ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit s t a t e d . Reviewed By Date VALIDATED Q~l(- fS 205 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL: 504-4690333 FAX: 504-469^)555 An E_quai_Qpportunity Employer 302 97 9 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOlOl Description: NA Sample ID: WAW-005 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 02/19/95 Received: 02/17/95 Prepared: 02/20/95 Analyzed: 02/23/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No, 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 U3 ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. Reviewed By Date VALIDATED '(f-/(- f S 206 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 . St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL: 504-469K)333 FAX: 504^69-0555 An Equal OppprtunHy Empjoyer 302980 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlonnaied Biphenyls Analysis Case Number ^50t ^^.A^IAAA}) ( y f ^ A ^ x r ^ O (Le>VtyAxVvM Project Number. 2 * ^ ^ 7 2 . . ) P - 2 - Site: Contractor Laboratory: V/\(^^ O4, f^'dvie ta^M4?'fft4< :k^ Validator i Validation Date: 3/317^ r QC Reviewer ^-^^^tJcXx^ ?^ ^ X 2 ^ Review Date: V/z-^/f/" Sample Matrix: |^ ) Q J J ^ ^ ^ ( J ^ • e?A Cli~? Onn^^^cA s o u ; 6£frt^(Vu^e^4^^1^ Analytical Method; Sample Designations m i o 0 0 0 f miAj 0 ^ 0 3 miAJn-ooti- m ^ / 0 ( 0 0 5 ' VVIM/O/O/ R6AUo:2- Data for the above samples are: Acceptable for use y Acceptable for use as qualified Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Prej^ct Manager? Yes (no Comments: p ^ ^ t o ^ > O j ; « - ^ - S - _ « . A H U U X < C ^ ^ C ^ ^ U $ ^ P A c W f e c ! ^ 5.a^r&^'Cfc;^vMj^^ Vl(dju^rLaJ2, Run^tifc^j-t^L^ (3w^^£c£M^.t.^ -c^o/ ocp_l.doc 10141994 1032 FormOCP 1.0 3 0 2 9 8 1 DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST X Included, no problems * Included, problems O Not included NA Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative • ^ SuriDgate Recovery Summary jl^ MS/MSD Summary X Reagent Blank Summary Sample Data - ^ Chain of CXistody Forms - ^ Holding Times • ^ Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms • ^ Pesticide/PCB Identification (for positive detections) Instrument Calibration and Performance Data y. Initial Calibration Retention Time Summary •?(^ Initial Calibration Response Factor Summary X Performance Evaluation Mix Summary X Continuing Calibration Verificauon Summary X Analytical Run Sequence Summary X GPC Calibration and Florisil Cartridge Check. Summary X Pesticide/PCB Standards Quantitation Reports y Pesticide/PCB Standards GC/EC Chromatograms Reagent and Instrument Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms X Pesncide/PCB Identification (for positive detections) 10141994 1032 FonnOCP I.O 302982 Matrix Spike Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms Comments: ocp.l.Ax; FonnCX3' 1.0 10141994 1032 1 302983 Harding Lawson Associates .,..—: 4 Engineering and :'; I = i'\ Environmental Services SHEET OF PROJECT (UijiyrLtH C ^ ' ' ^ ^ t i J V ^ A U A . SUBJECT. JfAy/^^JgJU jiuAVvnVA^M^ rP;.^^ r p R3Gr\^ JOZ.I^'^^ m\/^ooo\ YAW 0003 \A^ooo^ >{Y\VJO0OS' ^2>M0Z T30Z14- JOB NO. DATE 3/30!^^ COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY ! ^ ^^A/^jn-^^^tei^^ X £ . \^}AVJ003 WAA001 VJ/^iAlOO^ \jJA^ooz. VJAAoo(p \jJA\\)ooO 3 A \ 302984 SPECFIC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples property preserved ajjd^eived in good condition? Yes (No, Comments: T X e > ^ > ^ x i i ^ ^ O A ^ A ^ ^ - > W ^ ^ U L C « ^ ^ O u ^ j ^ U / ^ f ^ / / ^ C\^&fJi J U A ^ A^Ty^^fh^ J^^t-^ S3f\/^/0'l, 50F)A//3--/5"^ S^n'^lzv^zz S3f2A /0-{^ (>Md ^kU OA^^^^A^X^J^jAj^^ ^ RB'50/OZO^^^. ^ 0 > Holding Times Were sample extractions performed-wi|hin holding times? Yes r No Were sample analyses pej^emaed within holding times? Yes) No Comments: X M - y\JuO(yv>^Sbj^uir J^^O/y^^AoJ^ JLAH^^ Jiyf)^o^:^XL^ y ^ - ^ ^ M ^ \A\^o\o\ ^^^cx/wi 93&\j00t?£ J(^^\JiJiJU Cerv^-A^^>rtWfeX(j/u ocp_l.<fc>c FonnOCP 1.0 10141994 1032 4 302985 Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the guidelines regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? ^—N^ (VesJ No Were the calibration stand^rds^analyzed at the correct concentrations? /Yes) No Did the calibration curves meet ther11n«arity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes ( N O ) Were retention time windpwsvprovided and correcUy calculated? ( Yesl No Were peak resolutions accggtable? ( ^ ^ No Comments: Q J i ^ ^ B M C X ^ - % ) n e z t j d j L Z 0 % R , S V j U ^ r . ^ . I ^ M ^ j l ^ jy^j>o<yyvAju^ Y(\\AJIOO&\ ^Y^\^oooS^ miAjooo'4-^ yyiiAJooof mtJojol^ Individual Mix Standards (Continuing Calibration) Did the individual mix stapdacds meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? ( / ^ ^ No Did the individual mix stapdaids meet the retention time criteria? rYes) No Comments: Yterwt Form OCP 1.0 ocp_l.doc 10141994 1032 5 3 0 2 9 8 6 Performance Evaluation Mix Standards (Continuing Calibration) Did the performance evaluation mix standards meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? /Yes) No Did the performance evaluapqi mix standards meet the retention time criteria? fts) No yleTut Analytical Sequence Were standard and sampl^-tffiMyses performed following the correct analytical sequence? Yes I No VUYV^ Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveriejjuithin acceptance limits? Yes Ajoj If the spike recoveries werejmacceptable. were the samples reanalyzed? /Tes) No 3 0 2 9 8 7 Comments: « J L C » V < , ^ <)^ T ^ X ^ U h U d JO-yt^AiAViS^XJl^ SJ<AJU ^ aA^Cte'^iCAM^C<4^ (^ £ U JbnArj>AJ^^:jcU aWmx%Lfl/rvc. Rxc^iKA^^/tXtW, yh^A><A>*-^J d&XutjJi tG-\yu^^AJiAuU^ ^ ^ J l ^ ^ ( f ) M ^ W\\A^ooD\^YAVJo()h'}^ ynwiooo3^^, a W YY\WO\O\ . M A M I M oEi^^^^ /\>CeiK^UJL/ Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in this sample deUverv group (SDG)? (Yes) No Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes No Comments: YASfm S V (M'^JUciA^ jjyi)U^>^OP-<h^vfASl^ t r y ] ^ j ^ ^ ^ Y ^ V 0 0 0 O L \ ' . :)6^ JS-\^^^ (iro^^Afi^ J l s A ^ Were the appropriate nunjberof blank analyses performed? Mfes/ No Were instriiment blanks ajjalyzed at the correct frequency? MTes) No Were analytes reported in the blanks!^ Yes (No) If analytes were reponed in the blanks, were the same analytes also reported in the associated investigative samples? ^—>^ Yes No ( N ^ Did the sample results require qualifieation due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes ( N o ; Comments: )4rv^JL Fonn OCP 1.0 ocp_l .doc 10141994 1032 7 - . . . . . ^ 302988 Instrument Performance Were the percent breakdowB*^pr 4,4'-DDT and endrin correcdy reported? / Y e s ) No Were the percent breakdown»>for 4,4'-DDT and endrin within acceptance limits? /Yes) No Comments: GPC and Florisil Cartridge Check Was GPC cleanup performed on thft-sample extracts? Yes ( N O ) Was the GPC colunm check acceptable? ^ - ^ Yes No ( N A ) Was a Horisil cartridge checkj)erformed? rVes) No Was the Florisil cartridge dieck acceptable? Yes) No NA yirw^ ocp_l.doc 10141994 1032 Form OCP 1.0 302989 Laboratory Control Samples Were LCS analyses perfot Yes/ No Were the LCS recoveries wHhin acceptable limits? /Yes) No NA Sample Results Were target analytes reportedin the investigative samples? /Yes) No Were chromatograms provided for all target analytes reported in the investigative samples? /Yes) No Were chromatograms of acceptablp-qnality and were analytes correcdy identified? Yes ( N O 7 Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate standard and were the retention times (RTs) acceptable? Yes) No Comments: P.Xfat-3 M O ^>x)-tt4 ( h ^ J U t s L ^ j y ^ )^t^l2ty^,^M^ yHl^OOOi R ^ ^ t W ( c e ^ U ^ ) ' ^^2990 Harding Lawson Associates _===?==== Engineering and : s I = .:! Environmental Services PROJECT. SUBJECT 4 ) 4 ^ M v / Cl^Yr\i.c^^ L^mtA^»:Ma^^ SHEET_ JOB NO, DATE OF 3H^ COMPUTED BY(. CHECKED BY ynv)0Doi>9,€: 1 Z- l z^ 1 2. fir S.4-?^ 12.413 l^.?37 1^.7ZI )Z.41- 12.^1 H.4^'H.5'7 )^.7o-M.^4 CVwd.. O.OIZS 0.0752- O.OS(^1 100.+ 104:^1 ^ ^ • r T ^ 302991 Calculation Check Initial Calibration Retention Time Window: ion[2//o/^5; tion Time Window: C5 L J %RSD: Continuing Calibration tr^~^ ^Blr--'^|'-^*^ 3/0/^5-. |75'<^ Surrogate Recovery yV\U^00gl R E ) , n.0+^0 ^ Matrix Spike Recovery [n^VJOOOH )/K\^ fWy^X^J'^t^Vv'^ r^/yv£ 10^ ^ %R RPD: ForaiOCP 1.0 ocp_l.doc 10141994 1032 1 0 302992 Sample Results CRQL: YnMJOoo^\ Positive Result: ocp_l.doc 10141994 1032 J j 302993 HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Idcniification VYlVJOOOlKE WMJODO^Rg: Date Siunplcd Date Prepared Date Analyzed 2./l(cl^^ il\^h^ Z/tllc\^ iJTih^ ^/10/^5' 3/}oh5- Prep. Holding Time 7 ^lx>M<^ 1 deuA^ Analysis Holding Time ^ ^^y +C^ U f ' Qualifier L^h) :r/uy r/uj- yY\wniolR.£ PbGr\AJn2Psg z/K^h^ 2-/) 5/^^ 2j27/^^ 3>lloh^ T ({(AAAn. 2/27/95- v/0/9^ :z doiAjO^ ^ 0 ^(X ^0 ^ f r to o to VD Comments: ocpl .(lot 10141994 1032 Pcnn OCP 1.0 12 INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALIHCATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time hJ\ol°iB ]\==t-' r Instrument &cr Analyte n.il^^JL-^wc. ' RF — RSD [zo.i^ j Samples Affected ,m\A)ooo\^ muJoooZj vn{jjooo4-^ mwnnn^^ YUkJoioi^ mcijjn^^ Qualifier x/ur — f 1 u> o to VD VD U l Commcnis 1 ocp_l.doc 10I4I9W 1032 Tom OCP 1.0 13 CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument Analyte (odQ.Qii Cy.'AiCo\lcL. \^j^p.\y\A) ^ \ %D Samples Affected Qualifier 1 1 Coiniiicni.s: o lO VD VO 101J19W 1032 Fain OCP 1.0 14 BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID fvi^ J y ^ S i ^ Analyte 'y Cjtrnta/\v\AA\j^^^^-^n^) -^ \ Blank Result Units 5x Result Associated Samples Qualifier o to vo vo Coninicnl.s; o c p l .tl,.; 10141994 1032 Form OCP 1,0 15 Summary and Conclusions id^ (^.4^AP£ AhJiJ(dT.m^ (^ -tS^ /noAirrx J M A I &QiJ^ Q{ A iA^(^Xfr\(lUk ,A<^^ -rxo /:)4^ Vvtilw/TfyL . UriAAX r^nX^ Uy-Ujp JX\-^QjAndhiJ HAArP, (l/)JUuK/dr»^ f ' j n c ^ IMUJ^ yHJxJcJQAJJ V)00o'^R£ Q ^ i , w i w Q O Q ^ ^ A ^ A ^ ^ 2 x f e £ . r ) j l - h j F h S } K } ~ ^ i OvjQ^ J w i j y t . A 4 > M ^ J ^ ^ - H A f i ^ ft-ly-fe" n f(rP.m \U , ^Adfi QATi/cOwI/vt^ y^ eAj^t^A ^/JAA^jJ^.jHiJjjfA^ C G - V Y V ^ W 1 ^ ^ o/\f^r_o^ (l(iAi;±Ljfn^^ 0^tfJ'>JxxrTkkjy^ jA>-AA. \^ilo/^pJI ^r^ArjL^ yy^4j^A, A-/. AU^^ ^£v^C^lA^ -f X4AA rba^ O^HiiniiiZj^ Ac^ulkz. (rv\. Hrfkl. (Lfiium/^y^ Validator's Signature: ( \ ^ A ^ , 3 . [Atl'^Jih^^ Validator's Initials: Validation Date: QC Reviewer's Signature: ' ^ M A C X X / ' ;^ y^A-^-^y^ ^!^h^ QC Reviewer's Initials Mf'P Review Date: y / / ^ / f f ocp_l.(k>c 101419*4 1032 FooDOCy li) 16 302998 ID PESTICIDE ORGM?ICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEIT Lab Name: lb Codes SM3S. Cen'traet? ELK. Case NOo % HLA SAS -Mo. i EPA SAMPLE NO, MWOOOl Matrix? (soil/water) H&TSS Sample %ft/vols ISfifl. (g/mL) ML % Moistures decanteds (Y/N) Esctractions (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Concentrated Esetract Voliimes 2000 (uL) Injection Volismes Xi^fifi (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) M pHs 8.2 SDG No.i I^fii2_ Lab Sample ID: WAW004 Lab File IDs Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) ^ CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO, COMPOUND (ug/L o r ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 H e p t a c h l o r 309-00-2 A l d r i n 1024-57-3 H e p t a c h l o r epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 D i e l d r i n 72-55-9 4 .4 «-DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan I I 72-54-8 4 ,4 «-DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan s u l f a t e 50-29-3 4 ,4 ' -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin k e t o n e 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 a l p h a - C h l o r d a n e 5103-74-2 qamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 Reviev FORM I PEST Date . 'Kg) VQ/L . 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0,20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Q U T U U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u VAUDA] wed By SyihMsJi- 3 FED 3 02999 / 9 ^ PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEST EPA SAMPLE HO. Lab Name: G S E L T Contracts HJA. Case No.: HLA SAS Ho,s MWOOOIRE kib Code: PACE Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: ISiSSL. (g/nL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) coNT SDG No.; 95022 Lab Sample ID: WAW004RE Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volumes l.oo (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) H 20Pg (UL) pH: S.2 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/27/95 Date Analyzed: 03/10/95 Dilution Factor: j.OO L CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) M Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) yg/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 H e p t a c h l o r 3 09-00-2 A l d r i n 1024-57-3 H e p t a c h l o r epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 D i e l d r i n 72-55-9 4,4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan I I 72-54-8 ^^—4 , 4 ' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan s u l f a t e 50-29-3 4 ,4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin k e t o n e 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 a l p h a - C h l o r d a n e 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 6001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 A r o c l o r - 1 2 6 0 0.010 0.17 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.037 0.010 0.025 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 '0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U T P T U T U T U T uT U T U T U T U T U T uT U T U T U T U T U T pr UJ P T UT UT uT UT UT UT UJ uT Reviewed By FORM I PEST Date I DATED , /^M^ V96" 303000 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Lab Name: G S E L ; Contracts HIA_ Case No.s HLA SAS No,s MW0003 Codes ShSE Matrix: (soil/water) MK Sample wt/vol s ifiM_ (g/mL) M L % Moistures decanteds (Y/N) _ Extractions (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT SDG No.: 95022 Lab Sample ID: WAWO03 Lab File IDs Concentrated Extract Volumes Injection Volumes l.OO (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) M 200Q (UL) pHs 7.8 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO, COMPOtJND S u l f u r Cleanup: (Y/N) li Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1 0 2 4 - 5 7 - 3 — 959-98-8 6 0 - 5 7 - 1 72-55-9 72=20-8 3 3 2 1 3 - 6 5 - 9 - 72-54-8 1031-07-8— 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 7 4 2 1 - 9 3 - 4 - 5 1 0 3 - 7 1 - 9 - 5 1 0 3 - 7 4 - 2 - 8 0 0 1 - 3 5 - 2 - 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 alpha-BHC beta-BHC_J delta-BHC -gaaaa-BHC (Lindane). -Heptachlor - -Aldrin "Heptachlor epoxide_ -Endosulfan I '_ -Dieldrin -4 ,4 • -DDE -Endrin -Endosulfan II -4,4' -DDD " -Endosulfan sulfate -4,4' -DDT " Methoxychlor__ Endrin ketone —Endrin aldehyde_ —alpha-Chlordane_ —gamina-Chlordane_ —Toxaphene —Aroclor-1016_ —Aroclor-122l' —Aroclor-1232^ —Aroclor-1242' —Aroclor-1248]^ —Aroclor-1254" —Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 u j - u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u i Reviewed By FORM I PEST Date 3 / 9 0 303001 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Names G S E L I Contracts HIA. Case No.: HLA SAS No.s MW0003RE ^ Codes PACE Matrixs (soil/water) WATER Sample vt/vols 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moistures decanteds (Y/N) _ Extractions (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT SDG No.s 95022 Lab sample IDs WAW003RE Lab File IDs Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volumes 3,.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H 2000 (uL) pH: 7»9 Date Receiveds 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/27/95 Date Analyzed: 03/10/95 Dilution Factors 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanups (Y/N) 2! Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) Ug/L 319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 7421-93-4 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 lli04-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 -alpha-BHC -beta-BHC_^ delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Heptachlor -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide_ -Endosulfan I -Dieldrin -4 , 4 • -DDE -Endrin -Endosulfan II -4,4'-DDD ' -Endosulfan sulfate -4,4' -DDT '_ Methoxychlor Endrin ketone —Endrin aldehyde_ —alpha-Chlordane_ —gaimna-Chlordane_ —Toxaphene 0.010 0,010 0,010 0.010 0.010 0-oi's jLr&i^jd^ y 0,010 0,010 0.020 0,020 0,020 0.020 0.020 0,020 0.020 0,10 0.020 U T U T U T U T U T 0 . 0 1 ^ Si-f^ifrJBr' T —Aroclor-1016_ —Aroclor-1221_ —Aroclor-1232_ —Aroclor-1242_ —Aroclor-1248_ —Aroclor-1254_ Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 1,0 0.20 0.40 .0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U J U T U T U T UJ U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T u T UT UT uT U T U T uT .1. V FORM I PEST Reviewed By Date 303002 ^ ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G s E L i ^ >b Code; PACE Case No. s HLA_ Contracts ULL. SAS-No.s MW0004 SDG No.s 95Q22 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample *rt/vols 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moistxares decanteds (Y/N) __ Extractions (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Lab sample IDs WAAOOl Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volvunes Injection Volume: I.OO (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) H 2QQ0 (uL) pH: J U l Date Received: p2/I$/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzeds 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanups (Y/N) H CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITSS (ug/L or ug/Kg) VG/L Q 319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 — 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 7421-93-4 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 6001-35-2 12674-11-2 lli04-28-2 11141-16-5 — 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 — -alpha-BHC -beta-BHC_2 delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Heptachlor \ -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide, -Endosulfan I '_ -Dieldrin -4,4'-DDE -Endrin : -Endosulfan II -4,4'-DDD I -Endosulfan sulfate -4,4' -DDT " MethoxYchlor_ Endrin ketone •Endrin aldehyde_ -alpha-Chlordane_ -gamma-Chlordane_ -Toxaphene —Aroclor-1016_ —Aroclor-1221_ —Aroclor-1232_ —Aroclor-124 2_ —Aroclor-1248_ —Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-12 60 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 1.0 0 . 2 0 0 . 4 0 •0.20 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 0 uT- u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u U -"' u VALIDATED FORM I PEST Reviewed By ate 303003 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. "Lab Name; G S E L I ^ ^ Code: PACE case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 700.0 (g/mL) M L % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract; SAS-No.; MW0005 SDG No.; 95022 Lab Sampl® IDs WAWOOl Lab Fil© IDs Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume; 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H 2QQQ (uL) pH: • 8.1 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: P2/23,/9g Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanups (Y/N) H Q CONCENTRATION UNITS5 (ug/L or ug/Kg) fiS/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC fLindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4, 4'-DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4, 4'-DDD 1 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 1 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT *70.»A')^R^«.^^^»_^..Kr«%^K#^n^^v,..V«l ^o^ /^—4 J — o — — — M e t n o x y c n i o r 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 qamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.014 0.014 0.014 0,014 0.014 0,014 0.014 0,014 0,029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.14 0.029 0.037 JO.rQZ^' 0,014 0.014 1.4 0,29 0.57 ,0.29 1 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 uT u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u |U u FORM I PEST Reviewed By Date 303004 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: ELL. EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G S E L i Codes PACE Case No.; HLA SAS-No.s MWOlOl Jtotrix: (soil/water) WATER SDG No.s 95022 Sample «rt/vols % Moistures Extractions (SepF/Cont/Sonc) 1Q09 (g/mL) ML Lab Sample ID: WAW005 Lab File IDs decanteds (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volumes Injection Volumes l.OO (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) H 2ft99 (UL) pH: JSUI Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) H Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) Ug/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 g2unma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4 , 4 • -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4 , 4 ' -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-12 60 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 u T u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u I DATE FORM I PEST Reviewed By Date ^ ^ 3/90 303005 xw EPA SAMPLE NO. PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: G s E L T jjib T&t . Contract: HIA. Case No.s HLA SAS_No.: MWOIOIRE Code: PACE atrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 % Moisture; decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) £QHX SDG No.; 95022 (g/mL) ML Lab Sample ID: WAW005RE Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Voltuae: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M 2PPQ (UL) pH: 9.2 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/27/95 Date Analyzed: 03/10/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanups (Y/N) H Q CONCENTRATION UNITSS (ug/L or ug/Kg) VG/L 319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 7421-93-4 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 -alpha-BHC -beta-BHC_[ delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Heptachlor . -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide_ -Endosulfan I ~_ -Dieldrin -4,4' -DDE -Endrin -Endosulfan II -4,4' -DDD " -Endosulfan sulfate •4,4' -DDT_ Methoxychlor Endrin ketone -Endrin aldehyde_ -alpha-Chlordane_ -gamma-Chi ordane_ -Toxaphene —Aroclor-1016_ —Aroclor-122l' —Aroclor-1232_ —Aroclor-1242_ —Aroclor-1248_ —Aroclor-1254_ —Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.18 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.035 0.020 0.10 0.025 0.041 0.010 0.030 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 ' 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U T P T UT uT uT U T u-J- U T U3- P T U T U T U T p T uT U T P T P T uT P T U T U T U T uzr uT U T uT u r FORM I PEST , 0 3 0 0 6 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Names g g E L I Contracts EUL RBGW02 Tat Codes PACE Case No.: HLA SAS-No.; SDG No.; SiSQ2Z. trix; (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture; decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Lab Sample ID; WAWO02 Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Voliime: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) li 2PPP (UL) pH: S.2 Date Received: 02/17/95 Date Extracted: 02/20/95 Date Analyzed: 02/21/95 Dilution Factor: l.OO CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) M Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) I2SZL 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-8 5-7 beta-BHC 319-8 6-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 H e p t a c h l o r 309-00-2 A l d r i n 1024-57-3 H e p t a c h l o r epoxide 959-98-8—• Endosulfan I 6 0 - 5 7 - 1 D i e l d r i n 72-55-9 4 ,4 • -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan I I 72-54-8 4,4 • -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan s u l f a t e 50-29-3 4 . 4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin k e t o n e 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 a l p h a - C h l o r d a n e 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 A r o c l o r - 1 0 1 6 11104-28-2 A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 A r o c l o r - 1 2 4 8 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 A r o c l o r - 1 2 6 0 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 ,0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U J - U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T UT U T U T U T U T U T U J U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T U T FORM I PEST VALIDATED/) , Reviewed By L ^ f t i ^ ^ ^ J M f l ^ Date 303007 ID - PESTICIDE QWSmiQS ^HM^YSIS 0ATA SHEET Lab Names fi_SJi!_L_I cedes PACE Cum® UOoS EPA SAMPLE-HO. MB€W02RE ==^.. . Hat trixs (soil/water) Sample wt/vol; IPOQ Cf/aL) Ui % Moistures decanted§ (¥/N) Extractions (SepF/Cont/sone) fiSMS. Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volumes Xa^fi (uL) GPC Cleanups (Y/N) M 2B&S. (uL) pHs 8.2 Lab Sampl® IDs MMSSiZ Lab Fil® IDs Date Esceivsds Date Extracteds Date Analyzed: Q3/1Q/S5 Dilution Factors 1,00 Sulfur Cleanups (Y/N) M CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITSS (ug/L or ug/Kg) HgZIi. 319-84-6 319-85-7-= 319-86-8 58-89-9- 76-44=8 309»00-2- 1024-57-3 959-98-8 SO-57-1 72-55-9 ~ 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8-' •=- 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 7421-93-4 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 -alpha-BHC -beta-BHC —delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane), =Heptachl0r_ =Aldrin Heptachlor Endosulfan Dieldrin 4„4""DDE Endrin Endosulfan •4,4 « -DDD Endosulfan •4,4'-DDT epoxide I II sulfate —Methoxychlor_ Endrin ketone —Endrin aldehyde_ —alpha-Chlordane_ —gamma-Chlordane_ —Toxaphene —Aroclor=1016_ —Aroclor=122l' —Aroclor-1232_ —Aroclor-1242_ —Aroclor-1248' —Aroclor-1254' —Aroclor-1260 0. 0, 0, 0, 0, OoOlO 0,010 OoOlO 0.010 0,010 0,010 OoOlO ,010 ,020 ,020 ,020 ,020 0,020 0,020 0,020 0,10 0,020 0,020 0,010 0,010 l o O 0,20 0,40 0,20 0,20 0,20 0,20 0,20 Q U T UT UT UT U T UT UT UT uT UT uT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT uT uT U T uT u T uT u T UT U T U T FORM I PEST Reviewed By Date 3 0 3 0 0 8 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Metals Analysis Case Number Emiu Project Number 2 ^ ^"7 2 . , I C?. 2 - Contractor Labomory: f A C g , J L ^ ^ ^ . r t r ^ y: ?ACE Validator: Validation Date: 4/7/^5- QC Reviewer O^^^'^^-^lCjuf '^. T ^ A U L ^ Review Date: / / l 7 / f j ~ Sample Matrix: |^ ] e^Qjy^ ( j 2 ^ Analytical Methods: E?f\ t J ? V . L U A A . ^ W \ f h J L Sample Designations: YA\A)O0O\ WWA^OOC:^ Wlwoooif Yy\\AJooo5* \ V \ \ A ) C ) \ D \ P^GlJoZ- Data for the above samples are: _ _ ^ ^ _ Acceptable for use /(. Acceptable for use as qualified Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Efeject Manager? Yes (No) Comments: j / o 3 t b u •M^"U^^?h Gn^Jtw;t nxl_\ .doc 10U1994 1035 Foim MET 1.0 3 0 3 0 0 9 DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST X Included, no problems * Included, problems O Not included NA Not applicable Quality Control Summary Y Case Narrative X. Chain of Custody Forms X Cover Page X Holding Times y Inorganic Analysis Data Sheets • ^ Initial and Continuing Calibration Summary X ICP and AA CRDL Check Standard Summary X Linear Range Verification Standard Summary ^ Calibration and Preparation Blank Summary X. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary - ^ Matrix Spike Siunmary •?fe Post Digestion Spike Sample Summary • ^ Duplicate Sample Summary • ^ Laboratory Control Sample Summary NA Method of Standard Additions Summary X ICP Serial Dilution Summary X Quarterly Instrument Detection Limits Summary >< Annual Interelement Correction Factors Summary X Quarterly ICP Linear Range Summary y Sample Preparation Log Summary X Sample Analysis Run Log Summary Sample Raw Data X ICP Raw Data y GFAA Raw Data Mercury Raw Data N A Cyanide Raw Data Comments: :^u;^,03S 2 ^ - " ^ ' - ^ 303010 SPECmC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly presefwd and received in good condition? ( j e s ) No Were custody transfers corjecdy and completely documented? ^ e s ) No Comments: Holding Times Were sample preparations^H4^analyses performed within holding times? (Yes) No Comments: y\jfn\JL • ^ ' - ' • ^ -, Fonn MET 1.0 10141994 1035 J 303011 Harding Lawson Associates • _- _ Engineering and ; == l l Environmental Services SHEET OF PROJECT. SUBJECT JU^Und Ci^^Aia^: CgyVH^/n^ Ppvh^ \)(^^A A^nr- \jer(Kyv\/KAaJU J ^ U / m ^ y y u u u ^ rJLuvjh r p W\J^-\l0Z\G^B' ynwooo] yn\AJOoo3 m\j^ooo5' TBOZI + TBOZ\(p JOB NO. DATE 3/3c>hf COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY JArtdbii?. jjo/vyL^ct^vu,. X P V^AVJ003 WAA 001 \^fi^\^oo^ W^ooz. \JA A 00(0 VJA^ooO m 303012 Instrument Calibration Were instruments calibraipd-djuly and each time that sample analyses were performed? Q ^ No Were the instruments calibrated usi»g>ihe minimum required numbers of blanks and standards? Yes (^Nb) For the GFAA methods was one sjandard analyzed at the Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL)? Yes Q ^ For the applicable method^-^id the correlation coefficients meet the minimum requirement of 0.995? A'es) No NA For the cyanide analyses was a midrange sjandard distilled and analyzed? Yes No (VW Comments: Initial and Continuing Calibration Verification Were the calibration standarajNand blanks analyzed at the required frequencies? (Yes) No Were the standard recovenas-svithin QC limits? (Yes/ No Comments: ylervOJ^^ [Dct_l .doc 10141994 1035 4 Fotm MET 1.0 303013 CRDL Standards Were CRDL standards (Olf-and CRA) analyzed at the required frequency? ( Y ^ No Were the ICP standards (CW)vanalyzed at the required levels? /YesJ) No For the low concentration method, were the,€RDL results acceptable? Yes No Q ^ Comments: YLfTYVJZ. Matrix Spike Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in this SDG? ' Yes J No Were field or rinse blanks used for,jli^ spike analysis sample? Yes For^he s Were the matrix spike recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes (j>io) Were post-digesdon spikes performed whejj-«<yjired? Yes No iejwe<mire Comments: ^^•^^^ii^ ( ) i A n o J i ' ^ ^ T J U - J^^^iU.nYi^ teyyvjOMJuyJU^ JAJMAL e^vfe-u^c ( > > c i ^ j^u^vctv. (Jili4vm^e-i^ -102.G J ' / R (CM A^:^^^^^:^ ;&2mtw4VL 4^.0 j / w T IDCt_l jioc 10141994 1035 5 Form MET 1.0 303014 • Laboratory Control Sample Were laboratory control sampte analyses performed at the required frequency? /Yes/ No Were laboratory control sainpie recovery results acceptable? (Yes) No Comments: T - J L c ' ^ ^ - / ^ L JOK/jiGtl'tMVT^ j U ^ ^ 3 3 ^ 3 % . ^ / \ U J ^ a M ^ j j U . \oo.37o j.Ai^o^:):?wJLy\HJU£ ^loou^/X- TXJL v\ji^-:):h^AjL ICP Interference Check Sample Were ICP interference chepk-samples (ICS) analysed at the required frequency? Yes ) No MVur^ Were the ICS recovery criterift met? (_Yes) No Were results greater than tljsEDL jscorjed for elements not present in the ICS solution? (Yes" r^FP ^ — ^ Were negative results with absolute values greater than the IDL reponed for elements not present m the ICS solution? ^Yes] nrr Were the concentrations o^-metals in the investigative samples similar to the concentrations of the ICS solution? (No) Did the sample results require qua^ifiei^tion due to interference problems? Yes (No Comments: YUyvU D3et_Uc>c 10141994 1035 6 FonnMETl.O 3 0 3 0 1 5 Duplicate Sample Results Were duplicate sample analys^ performed at the required frequency? (Yes) No Did the duplicate sample results mpet>^cceptance criteria? Yes / N o , Comments: (Xydbuyvv^en^u. < 2 t > % R ? V Z0.09>% X / u T Blank Analyses Were preparation and calijaation blank analyses performed at the required frequency? (Yes) No Were elements reported in the blanks-^ levels above the CRDL? Yes ( W ) Were elements reported LrHhe^lanks at levels between the IDL and the CRDL? (YesJ No Were negative results with absolute-values greater than the IDL reported in the blanks? Yes ( N O ) If analytes were reponed in the blanks, were the same analytes also reported for the associated investigative samples? ^ Yes) No Did the sample results reaijircs^ualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? fYesJ) No Comments: ( I J L A A , % /O^Ouf^M- -Xfri a j^My^Y^^mO^y^ t f J t ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ mcl_l JIOC 10141994 1035 Fonn MET 1.0 3 0 3 0 1 6 ICP Serial DiluUon Were serial dilution analyses-performed at the required frequency? /Vesy No For analytes with concentrations greater than 50 times the IDL. were the percent differences within acceptance criteria? ^ — N (Yes; No Comments: ^[jrrJL GFAA QC Were duplicate injections oerformed for each GFAA sample analysis? (jYes) No For results greater than theJIlMJL were the percent RSD results calculated correcdy and within control limits? (Yes) No NA Were the GFAA analytical spike toesHdigestion spike) recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes O ^ If the GFAA analytical spike recoveries were not acceptable, were samples diluted and reanalyzed when required? ' Yes ) No Was the method of standard addiuons,iMSA) used for GFAA analysis when required? Yes T N O J When MSA analyses were performed, v^^te-the correlation coefficients and spiking levels acceptable? Yes No M\J/^) Comments: Y ^ - S^^^^^^i^^-^ry^ A ^ d ^ ^ M jL^/^CUSkH ddU- S ^ ^ \ 1 ^ ^ o mU^-OIOl ^ S ^ , T I "Z^-^)!!^-^ T/U3-. T/- muJ-0005" W S ^ T l 13^.3 T / - muJ-ooo^ T l 117.^ s i - mct_l.doc 10141994 1035 8 ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ' • " 3 0 3 0 1 7 ICP Interelement Correction Factors Were annual interelement correction factors provided for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? Yes ) No Comments: yitfTie ICP Linear Ranges Were linear ranges providpd-for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? (Yes) No Was a quarterly linear range-^rification analysis performed and if so, were the results acceptable? /YesJ No For the low concentration method was a linear range standard analysis performed as required, and if so. were the results acceptable? Yes No /^NA Comments: yle-nje. Log Books Were all sample preparations-properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes ) No Were all sample analyses oreperly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? (Yes) No Comments: TWc met_l.doc 10141994 1035 Fonn MET 1.0 303018 Sample Results Were target analytes reporjpdon the investigative samples? /Yes] No Were the quantitated resuks-for target analytes calculated and reported correctly? (Yes) No NA For the applicable methods, were peak intesFHtisns performed correctly? Yes No ( N A ) Were detection limits provided for the reported target analytes, and if so. were they current and acceptable? (Yes) No Comments: yiwe- mcl_l.doc 10141994 1035 1 0 F o ^ ^ ^ ^-0 303019 HOLDING TIME QUALIHCATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Identification 1 (oJlt JU^U^-i 0 Analyte Myy^A- lA>^Aji Date Siunpled \AAJi:h) Date Prepared Date Analyzed Analysis Holding Time Qualifier o i Comments: UJ 1 o to o ntcl^l.doc 10IJI994 1035 11 FonnMETl.O BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID P9>\jJ iPftlW Pftlxj CCI? RBu; Analyte [P\AJlA\A^1i^ 3M^A£1AX.^^A^ £1 M^LoA/yJuu*/^ '^/VlXL- d Blank Result (units) jAl^jJi 1.735- O.liJ^ 0.1^5' 2.3 l A o o Action Level 9.^15- 3.^4 3.^75- II.e- 31.0 Associated Samples (aill^Ut.vyiApile^ \. p-^ V Qualifier -/u 1 \f Comments: w o u> o 10 nK(_l,doc 10N1994 1035 12 Form MET 1.0 Summary and Conclusions OA i^ wuir. ^a.^^Arf^^^ AJJA.Y k)0. o,^Jl_A/h.yA(Jb^ ] : o ^ rr^A - ^ n ^ n r J f ^ ^ f o f ^ } ^ ISs , UMX D u e -^h OoJl\h-Le:l^fry^nA^A >t. >v^>e-r^ J(^vfi^/^>A Ofr^^^toArYXA^^^tZci^. A/V^ ^ A Y A ^ i ^ l?fefi-U/nZ. piAAxAAg- t j ^ T ^ A U X /KOA'^yJlAX VAy<A^ ni//\fS aA^iXf ^^m- ^J^y^ A, OJ^ y l Q d d ^ I^IAJOIOI gtmdg miA)^/)n4^^ ^Vi/^ .M/>^i?;..^ ( J " / - ) , M ^ 7 .^. I A / L ^ Validator's Signature: Validator's Initials: Validation Date: L^- / / Z-/'?5^ QC Reviewer's Signatiue: ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ QC Reviewer's Initials A//^/' Review Date: y Z / j / ^ J ^ mct_l jioc 10141994 1035 13 Fonn MET 1.0 303022 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. Wab MWOOOl IMORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Naunes PACE Contracts Code; GULF Case No.s HLA SAS No.s SDG No.s 095026 Matrix (soil/water)s WATER Lab Sample IDs WBH004 Level (low/med)s LOW Date Receiveds 02/17/95 % Solidss OoO Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight)s UG/L CAS NOo 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminvim Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryl livim Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentrat ion 51.8 1,8 7.1 124 0.67 3.1 42500 4.9 9.5 29,9 32.1 1.1 30500 1190 0,20 13.1 2250 15.0 6.9 389000 2.7 28.5 59,1 C B B > B ^ U B U U > U U B B B U B Q N* T " (J ' a * o- - u NW J- N J- M P F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Befores COLORLESS Color After; COLORLESS Comments s Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO FORM I - IN 303023 ILM02.0 080004 Name; PACE Code; GULF Matrix (soil/water) Level (low/med)s % Solids; UcSo EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract; Case No,; HLA SAS No.; WATER LOW 0,0 EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0003 SDG No.s 095026 Lab Sample IDs WBH003 Date Received; 02/17/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight); UG/L CAS No. 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Alumintim Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 64.0 4,9 8.6 286 0.31 3,1 125000 8.0 9.5 31.5 454 0.87 70700 3100 0.31 38.2 15500 14.0 5.1 351000 2.7 11.0 160 C B B JBT ^ U B U J^ B U U U B Q N* q- ' \i ' u * r " a N T N W M P F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Before; COLORLESS Color Afters _ COLORLESS Comments; Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Reviewed By Date — FORM I - IN Texture: Artifacts: NO ^2^2 303024 ILM02.0 080005 UoSo EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. # ^ MW0004 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Names PACE Contract; Code; GULF Case No,; HLA SAS No,; SDG No,; 095026 Matrix (soil/water); WATER Lab Sample IDs WBJOOl Level (low/med); LOW Date Received; 02/16/95 % Solids; OoO Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight); UG/L CAS No, 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 42.3 95,6 1.9 70.6 0.61 3.1 49000 4.1 9.5 30.8 32.1 1.7 35200 535 0.20 25.3 2000 1.4 5.1 374000 2.7 26,2 93.0 r c B > B ^ U B U U > U B B U U U B Q N* J" r u -" Ik * .T ' U NW T N M P~ F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Before: COLORLESS Color Afters COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Date FORM I - IN Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed By ) > - M f l ^ Z j £ h M E ^ '^li^K ILM02.0 303025 J U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0005 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ^ P a b Name; PACE Contracts Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: O95026 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample IDs WBHOOl Level (low/med): LOW Date Receiveds 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight)s UG/L CAS No. 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barivim Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 45.7 1.5 3.4 277 2.1 3.1 60300 5.9 9.5 48.3 32.1 3.0 52700 2160 0.20 33.1 3300 14.0 5.1 334000 2.7 26.0 103 C B B ^ U B U U U B B U U U B Q N* .T- ^ U V \. \X * zr u N rr N W M P F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviev'cd By VAWDATg Date — FORM I - IN 303026 ILM02.0 080007 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. » MWOlOl INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET b Name: PACE Contracts Lab Code; GULF Case No.s HLA SAS No.s SDG No.s 095026 Matrix (soil/water)s WATER Lab Sample IDs WBH005 Level (low/med)s LOW Date Receiveds 02/17/95 % Solids; 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight)s UG/L CAS No, 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentrat i on 40.3 1.4 4,8 126 0.28 3.1 46000 5.1 9,5 16.7 32.1 1,2 33100 1020 0.20 13.1 2050 17.6 5.3 411000 2.7 31.1 61.4 C B B > B ^ U B U U U ^ U u B B B u B Q N< ' D^ - (i ' \k * ;r - \k NW X N T W M P F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments; Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR FORM I - IN Reviewed Cy „ Date — Texture: Artifacts: NO 303027 ILM02.0 080008 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. • ^ RBGW02 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Ncu^ie: PACE Contract: Lab Code: GULF Case No.s HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095026 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WBH002 Level (low/med): LOW Date Receiveds 02/17/95 % Solidss 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight)s UG/L CAS No. 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 22.0 2.2 1.8 8.8 0.49 3.1 80.2 4.1 9.5 16.7 32.1 3.6 26.0 2.6 0.20 13.1 526 2.5 5.1 339 2.7 4.5 79.0 C B B ^ U ^ U B U U U U U U U U U > u u u u Q N* J" ' Kk ' '( * 3- 'A N M T N M P~ F F P F P P P P P P F P P CV P P F P P F P P Color Before; Color After: Comments: Clarity Before: Clarity After: Texture: Artifacts; VALID ATEL Reviewed By ^ ^ - - ^ ^ r V ^ U r m ^ ^ ^ , . Date T^^^Zligi FORM I - IN 303028 ILM02.0 08000^i- HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Metals Analysis Case Number : <^ 5 0 2 Z Site: . ( L A u , i r J L ^ r ^ O C. Project Number. " Z ^ S ^ Z , \ 0 . Z Contractor Laboratory: r A c ^ , .\A\^ Validator Validation Date: L^/\ 2>/<^ ^ QC Reviewer 0 ^ 9 ^ . ^ ^ / ^ ^ '^. T Z ^ l ^ O ^ Sample Matrix: ^ ^ j ( U ^ \ A ] A ^ ( J ) Review Date: y / / y / f r~ Analytical Methods: E ? ( K ( ^ R ^ ^ ^ k h l ^ A ^ ^ ^ Sample Designations: A\ooo\ A i i . ^ i ^ AIZ0Z2. A2000I Vnu;oooi mu;ooo3 yviiA)c?o£)4- )/Vi.M;n(?06 IMIVOJOI t^9(;-u;oz 50OZO3 Data for the above samples are: Acceptable for use A Acceptable for use as qualified Unacceptable for use Is action required by the/f^ojbpt Manager? Yes ( No ( J P A J ^ T I A ^ m«i_!.doc 10141994 1035 303029 Fonn MET 1.0 DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST X Included, no problems * Included, problems O Not included NA Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative • ^ Chain of Custody Forms X Cover Page y Holding Times ^ Inorganic Analysis Data Sheets jf^ Initial and Continuing Calibration Summary X ICP and AA CRDL Check Standard Sunamary X Linear Range Verification Standard Summary -^ Calibration and Preparation Blank Simunary A ICP Interference Check Sample Summary ^ Matrix Spike Summary ^ Post Digestion Spike Sample Summary ^ Duplicate Sample Summary jif Laboratory Control Sample Summary X Method of Standard Additions Summary - ^ ICP Serial Dilution Summary X Quarterly Instrument Detection Limits Summary X Annual Interelement Correction Factors Summary X Quarterly ICP Linear Range Summary X Sample Preparation Log Summary X Sample Analysis Run Log Summary Sample Raw Data X ICP Raw Data X" GFAA Raw Data X Mercury Raw Data X Cyanide Raw Data Comments: CDCl_l A>C 10141994 1035 2 Fom.METl.0 303030 SPECIHC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved andNreceived in good condition? Yes /^No) Were custody transfers c9nFeetly and completely documented? Yes) No Comments: Holding Times fitZdooi Were sample preparationsaad analyses performed within holding limes? /Yesj No Comments: yUrtC 10141994 1035 Fonn MET 1.0 303031 _ __ Harding Lawson Associates ! - . - - J Engineering and i = ; == ; 1 Environmental Services PROJECT. SUBJECT SU^Unrl. C / m u > ^ . CxTWtfg/mH,. Ppvfe, l/AXc^fCtWy^ |>6^^LrvvyXe JHCW/VYVAAMJ CXo/w^ n ^ - 3 l OZ]f?']^ R3GrlAj JOZ]^"^^ SBFIA/O-I 5 B F I A / | 3 ' ( 5 ' 5^FlA/aO-a^ SBFZA/O-I m\^ooo5' ^BMoz TB0Zi4- S00Z03 f\\0oo\ A ii^l^" IKZooo I SHEET _ JOB NO. DATE OF ^/w^^ COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY urtM ^ xz V^AVJ003 VJfitf^oo] \/JA\/<}00l \/JA\A^oo^ \^AWoz^ VlAAoob \J\fooo\ VVOOOZ- \J\JO00^ 303032 m Instrument Calibration Were instruments calibrataWaUy and each time that sample analyses were performed? /Yes7 No Were the instmments calibrated usjftgahe minimum required numbers of blanks and standards? Yes TNO) For the GFAA methods wa»-otje standard analyzed at the Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL)? (Yesj No For the applicable methodg-4ki the correlation coefficients meet the minimum requirement of 0.995? (Ves) No NA For the cyanide analyses yes~a midrange standard distilled and analyzed? , Yes) No Comments: litial and Continuing ling (BalibratiorijVerification [N cJrMu. CRPi Were the calibration starularTls\and blanks analyzed at the required frequencies? ( Y e s j No Were the standard recovepas-vwihin QC limits? (YesJ No Comments: TlevvC m«t_l.doc 10141994 1035 Fonn MET 1.0 303033 CRDL Standards Were CRDL standards (C^J-and CRA) analyzed at the required frequency? (Yes) No . Were the ICP standards (CTJ).anaiyzed at the required levels? (Yes) No For the low concentration method, were theJZ^L results acceptable? Yes No / ^ A i Comments: YIAYJ^ Matrix Spike Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in this SDG? /-—N (^es) No Were field or rinse blanks used for,ih« spUce analysis sample? Yes / N O ) Were the matrix spike recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes ( N O ) Were post-digestion spikesTrerformed when required? (Ves) No NA Comments: \Yi6 ( ^ M ^ l L ^ J,J,>-€L^ ^ 2 ^ ^ A \0DO\ OVcti>VAVKU^ zoA A i Z W ^ .ieWuttw 20-0 I ynwooo4- QJlu/YvwnAAAn 5"5'.^ OJlj>rds.A^ ^ ^ ^ . . ^ 25.5 {pp<Uif^S>0C7£>3) X ( R W<(AA\aaAyjLCuz^ 57-2- ^MAMTV^ 3^.0 IDel_l jJoc 10141994 1035 Form MET I.O VQAOOI QAvttw^rvw(, 1^-7.7 SOOZO^ 3 - / - 303034 Laboratory Control Sample Were laboratory control sajpple analyses performed at the required frequency? (Yes) No Were laboratory control sample recpvefy results acceptable? Yes /No comments: T J U - | ^ L M ^ O / V V X t ^ d ^ ^ ^ Y ^ ^ Z ^ A ^ M j l C ^ ^ ^ A t ^ i ^ ^ M j o l d L r^^TvW^ j . W ^ _ J X £ R £ A V L ^ _ ^ ^ ^ : ^ / > W v ^ _ ^ P ^ I ^ u A ^ <^o-\to7oZA^- \Zo.G% S00Z03 ^ 1 " ICP Interference Check Sample Were ICP interference chec^.5amples (ICS) analysed at the required frequency? /YeT) No Were the ICS recovery crijeria met? (Yes) No Were results greater than the EDL r&ported for elements not present in the ICS solution? Were negative results with absolute values greater than the IDL reponed for elements not present in the ICS solution? -—^ Were the concentrations oLroemls in the investieative samples similar to the concentrations of the ICS solution? Did the sample results require quahfie^^tion due to interference problems? Yes /NO Comments: yijryyJi^ 10U1994 1O35 6 Form MET 1.0 303035 Duplicate Sample Results Were duplicate sample analyses performed at the required frequency? /Yes) No Did the duplicate sample results me Yes /No) acceptance criteria? J^j(juJiU.4:kL ^ A M ^ A J : ^ ! ^ j i ^ ^ Comments: -, 0 4,- ^^^^^^^^^V^^ . a . i ^ j k ^ ^ C t T u x t w ^ CJ^^ovruu>uvv^ <Z;<C^PL= fr^- ^.G 6u!J^buMu^ (X&JlyM^ T/UX .,/.,.^.i F^/,/,- ^zo^o^?v n.^% o^oA^KtJA^ 500^) T/WT ^^^6?ailk A r B j ^ ^ / ^ ' ' ^ < k c e P L : . ) . 0 \ . l d X ^ u ^ ^ A . ^ S O O Z O ^ T / U X Were preparation and caiihratien blank analyses performed at the required frequency? /Ves) No Were elements reponed in the blanlasit levels above the CRDL? Yes m o ) Were elements reponed in tjje blanks at levels between the EDL and the CRDL? (^esj No Were negative results with,ahsolute values greater than the IDL reponed in the blanks? (Tes) No If analytes were reported in the blanks, were the same analytes also reponed for the associated investigative samples? .—s ( Y ^ No Did the sample results reqyjie qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? /Yes) No Comments: mei^l-doc 10U1994 1035 7 FonnMETl.O 303036 ICP Serial Dilution Were serial dilution analys?*-performed at the required frequency? (Yes y No For analytes with concentrations greater than 50 times the IDL. were the percent differences within acceptance criteria? ^—v^ Yes (NOJ Conmcnts: ' T Z t ^ A M i r u A y ^ { 0 % ( X C a m a A ^ ^ Aioodi ~ ^ ^ ^ '5*. 2- i!wiA^^^ T/uh- Ccx£ciJU/»V 1 3 . 7 I ^- »^-^ -r-'A.-r Sooao3) ^/^^5 J/i^x x/ux GFAAQC i l f e r - 'lO.? Were duplicate injections D»rfqrmed for each GFAA sample analysis? (YesJ No For results greater than the£^r)L were the percent RSD results calculated correctly and within conffol limits? (Yes) No NA Were the GFAA analytical spike (postcdigestion spike) recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes (_No) If the GFAA analytical spike recoveries were not acceptable, were samples diluted and reanalyzed when required? 'Yesj No Was the method of standajd-additions (MSA) used for GFAA analysis when required? (Yes) No When MSA analyses were^-performed. were the correlation coefficients and spiking levels acceptable? ^/Ves) No Comments: Y ^ - d ^ ^ A t i e ^ - j^iSL^je yU^^uj2i4' J<J}MSL e-vdA^Jb Jch^ ^ ^ ' i \ ^ % (UhAU-h^m^ fl^uJLd^ ^ P ^ _ _ QJJJA^^JU^ ^ooo\ A5^Pb; " $^s,m ' r l j W\v)ooo<\r Bey,5^ S'^3;65:^ x/uT Ra&goz, ^ e S2.+ 3/WJ YAvJoio) ^^j'?^ _ n.o,1^.-7 j/uX tnci.ljiac 10141994 1035 8 ^°"° ^^"^ '-^ m\^iOOO\ Se. 6'^.(p ^-^3^^037^"^'^' ICP Interelement Correction Factors Were annual interelement correction factors provided for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? ^ ^ ^ /Yes y No Comments: yUn^ ICP Linear Ranges Were linear ranges provickd-for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? (Ves) No Was a quarterly linear raneg-*ierification analysis performed and if so, were the results acceptable? (Yesj No For the low concentration method was a linear range standard analysis performed as required, and if so. were the results acceptable? / ~ \ Yes No (NAJ Comments: Vlr^ Log Books Were all sample preparatipns^roperly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? (V|J No Were all sample analyses nrenerly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? (Yes) No Comments: VWw^ C3Ct_l.doC 10141994 1CJ35 9 FonnMETl.O 303038 Sample Results Were target analytes reponedvin the investigative samples? (YesJ No Were the quantitated resuhs-fbr target analytes calculated and reported correctly? (Ve^ No NA For the applicable methods, were peak integrations performed correctly? Yes No ( NA, Were detection limits provided, for the reported target analytes. and if so, were they current and acceptable? (^Yesj No Comments: /\\00O\ OAJL /\Tl3l^.AA>t^ jAAxM^^Xl^- ^J^f^Ji^^:^o:k - M ^ ruct.l.doc 10141994 103 5 1 0 Form MET 1.0 303039 HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Sample liicnlification \\(r\(lO tMlAAAr\ Analyte hryKvte^' xx>M Date 1 Sampled ^ yvKBX) / Date Prepared Date Analyzed Analysis Holding Time Qualifier Comments; o CO o o nri. I.Joe 10l419iH 1035 11 Fcm MET 1.0 BLANK SUMMARY FORM (SOIL S A M R ^ S ) Blank ID Analyte Blank Result (units) Action Level Associated Samples Qualifier 0013 5" rcgz. XV^z- 01 JUAva./vuxtw PiM^^^U<4Vl •'3Q>.^ JA^IJ^ 0. 7-,JUfll 3 U w ^ l i ^ . A\000\, A\\3\S'j A l2.n7.Zj QAL '^^•(f.JUfU i4% 6'^-(/>Yty^/(^ AZODO) TC^I £l AHvfrVVV.A.XVvvv- 4:1 ,A^Y^ 4 / m^./ji:^^ FB5 C.CSI XCg'Z^ CC01O JfrerL ;jLgyi/j^ 6^^7yv\^/f^<^ / r I <T^^-YV^<\xtJytVt Z^y^i^ 34r35ivv^/^. ^^reCtYvUAA^yy, -^o-tif/^ ZZwu^lK^ Cl.2> 'Ji^lJl ^0.^^]^'- Z l m ^ ^ PBS ^'/WC^ •'?z4-wig/K^ \2-01Y^I^, :t Comments: w o o nKl.l.d.K: 10I4I994 1035 12A- FoTOi MET 1.0 BLANK SUMMARY FORM (WAT^R SArv\pLES) Blank ID Analyte Blank Result (units) Action Level Associated Samples Qualifier C C 3 ^ P W \ tC'B'Z- (XJOU-YVU/KAMVL 3ji^MuA/n\- iKoM^lA. QjO±JA^Jj^ IS^MflJi zlhk^ik m M ^ 2(eh4l^ Yr\\A)ODO\^ vniA)ooo3,vy\W0ooLi W)u)ooof;. yy)iAjnioi. m&vJo7. ^0020^ 1(i2>\ CC&7 ^-1 ,tA^ISy Z.Z,A^\ji T-O.^^iAJ^jP. WjA/^JL rc^z- M CC6I0 -foAu^lJ^ :z-^jA^I^ Z^^.^JA^I^ L L l ^ u ^ F6W2. ' ^ M ' ^ ^ ^.Q'^^.Mf/^ 4^^4/^ t Comments: to o to o to ii«:l_l..ltx- 10141994 1035 ] 2 3 F.OTi MET 1.0 Summary and Conclusions xmJUIakcQ'y^ &f. MU. d J j J i jdL . ^fcvv^ (^Ay^^OA^j. L^J-AJ^ P.^dyyY\AXi>A JA^yji , A M 1 L A M ^ . . ixQA^y^MlU^ A I 000\ OA^l lAJ^A^ rld/^Ae^&yx f ChXM^Ad. J (1(A dti~t AdKi.-r j.A)^.e/-vAM^ a ^ ( ( f\A:fb J?y4 y^n/jp. J^A"' ^ f & ^ l A y ^ J L QiAoJL a A A kA^^Ji^±bJl. [Uj 9vn AJLJ) frv\, riySJf^^ _ ViL^>~d^ ^A^<daJl fr\A. YlAnr^i 12 B. %A>.iy\joJl. (^jPr^A2^^\AAx^A^ liA>lA^ J ^ i ^ c d z J i Y j y l u T ) frl/1 y g ^ ^ ^ ^ A k x i f ^ AQj^^b-d!:. '^ikjuAyJA^j j^Uyu^eJ^(^A\AiLr 6^)^ A^^^iiuL^^. .AgA^'ruJi^ CJ'K A.^e-y^ rpa^P^} .yy^r^^^ V^ (>A/^,/9A^-'dAMA ^..\Ajalt Vahdator's Signature: Validation Date: ^ / / 3 / ^ 6 " Validator's Initials: QC Reviewer's Signature: ^9nHAijiA ^ 'y^^yCj^/e^ QC Reviewer's Initials /^/'/* Review Date: y / / y / ^ j rDct_l.do<; 10141994 1035 13 Fonn .MET 1.0 303043 ^K^: U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET b Name: PACE Contract: ^jab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 91.1 concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG I I I AlOOOl I I I SDG No.: 095022 Lab Sample ID: WO002 Date Received: 02/06/95 1 1 ICAS NO. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 [7440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony 1 Arsenic 1 Barium | Beryllium] Cadmium | Calcium | Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium 1 Silver Sodium 1 Thallium ["Vanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration j 14200 0.46 0.96 63.2 0.21 1.1 119000 14.8 10.4 28.7 18100 5.3 6830 489 0.11 11.4 1240 3.1 1 1.1 1 556 1 0.59 1 48.7 1 87.9 1 1.1 1 1 CI Q 1 1 1 1 1 BjNW J " 1 Bl T" 1 1 1 ^ a 1 1 1 1* 1 1* j - Bl 1 1 | S ^ 1 1 [i 1 m m K lui IB! lUI 1 IE 0" lui x 1 1 M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 cvi P 1 P 1 F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 1 ni'!' v-'v-^^' Color Before: BROWN c o l o r A f t e r : BROWN Comments: ROCKS C l a r i t y Before: C l a r i t y A f t e r : CLEAR T e x t u r e : COARSE A r t i f a c t s : YES Date j^^tfe^^ Reviewed By FORM I - IN 050006 ILM02.0 303044 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. I I 1 A11315 I INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET tab Name: PACE Contract: 1 | uab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: W0003 L^vel (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/06/95 % Solids: 91.3 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 17440-50-8 1 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony ] Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesitim Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium 1 Thallium ["Vanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration 19200 0.31. 1.5 110 0.31 1.4 9900 15.9 11.1 39.9 24600 2.7 5780 542 0.11 15.8 1230 0.31 1.1 1 1360 1 0.59 1 105 1 42.1 1 1.1 1 CI 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 ^ N Bl 1^ 1 r 1 1 I 1 1 1 * 1 * X 1 1 1 1 1 1 \2 1 1 l^NW PL |U| 1 1 |U| 1 1 1 IE 3- 1U| sT 1 1 M 1 p 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P i P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CVI P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 |F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 1 Color Before: BROWN Color After: BROWN Comments: ROCKS Clarity Before: Clarity After: CLEAR Reviewed By Date FORM I - IN Texture: COARSE Artifacts: YES ' ^ > P f ' ^ ^ 050007 ILM02.0 303045 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. • " A12022 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: PACE Contract: 1 | >-vJ3 Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: W0004 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/06/95 % Solids: 83.4 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG 1 1 ICAS No. 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 17440-70-2 17440-47-3 17440-48-4 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte | Aluminum 1 Antimony^ Arsenic Barium 1 Beryllium 1 Cadmium | Calcium 1 Chromium Cobalt 1 Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide ! Concentration 21700 1 0.34 1 1.2 1 122 0.46 1 2.0 1 7950 31.4 21.4 61.7 38500 5.0 10300 1120 0.25 21.3 1120 3.4 1.2 1790 0.65 138 1 70.7 1 1.2 C| 1 Q 1 t 1 1 J»1N B| ^ 1 sT 1 1 * I* X 1 B! Jt^N R. U| U| 1 |F |U| U^ r M 1 P 1 F i F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CVI P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 . 1 :olor Before: BROWN :olor After: BROWN Comments: ROCKS Clarity Before: Clarity After: CLEAR Reviewed By y Date FORM I - IN Texture: COARSE Artifacts: YES ^^ ' Oboooy 303046 ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO, m A20001 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ab Name: PACE Contract: 1 | Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: W0005 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/06/95 % Solids: 89.2 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 1 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte | Aluminum | Antimony^ | Arsenic | Barium | Beryllium 1 Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt 1 Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration 16300 1 0.39 1 0.95 1 95.2 1 0.31 1 1.3 1 101000 1 21.4 1 13.3 1 40.0 1 23500 4.8 6730 601 0.24 13.2 1970 3.1 1.1 491 1 0.61 1 89.1 1 178 1 1.1 1 C| 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 B|N B|W J" 1 sT 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 * 1 1* T 1 1 i 1 1 1 IS r 1 ' 1 1 1 1 J»1N R Ul Bl |U| 1 1 1 |E |U| T r 1 1 M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV] P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 |F 1 P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 1 n^f i-iv-''' Color Before: BROWN Color After: BROWN Comments: ROCKS Clarity Before: Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: COARSE Artifacts: YES Reviewed By Date VAkl D AJE FORM I - IN 303047 050009 ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOOOl INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 1 ^A-rb Name: PACE Contract: | 1 Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAW004 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 1 Mil ICAS No. 1 Analyte 1 Concentration 1C| Q IM 1 1 i 1 M i l 17429-90-5 1 Aluminum I 656 1 |EN*T IP 1 17440-36-0 1 Antimony | 1.4 |U|N |F | 17440-38-2 lArsenic | 4.4 |B| |F | 17440-39-3 1 Barium 1 145 1B| IP 1 17440-41-7 IBerylliuml 0.20 I^N* U |F 1 17440-43-9 1 Cadmium 1 3.1 1U| IP | 17440-70-2 1 Calcium | 49800 | IE CT |P ! 17440-47-3 1 Chromium | 4,4 |>r [A |P | 17440-48-4 ICobalt | 9.5 1U| |P | 17440-50-8 ICopper | 16.7 |U| |P | 17439-89-6 1 Iron | 640 I |N* X |P 1 17439-92-1 ILead | 1^9 l^f U |F | 17439-95-4 |Magnesium| 34400 | |EN X IP 1 17439-96-5 1 Manganese] 1450 ||E T |P 1 17439-97-6 |Mercury | 0.20 |U| |CV| 17440-02-0 INickel 1 13.1 |U| IP 1 17440-09-7 IPotassiumI 2350 |B1 |P | 17782-49-2 | Selenium | 24.2 IBINWJ" |F 1 17440-22-4 ISilver ! 5.1 |U| IP 1 17440-23-5 ISodium | 432000 M E T |P 1 17440-28-0 IThallium | 2.7 |U| |F | 17440-62-2 IVanadium | 33.3 |B| IP | 17440-66-6 IZinc 1 31.4 M M |P 1 157-12-5 1 Cyanide j 10.0 jUl W |AS| 1 1 1 . II "^ 1 1 ^ Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR FORM I - IN Texture: Artifacts: NO 303048 nnOOiO ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0003 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 1 I r-ab Name: PACE Contract: 1 | Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAW003 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 1 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic Barium | Beryllium Cadmium Calcium | Chromium Cobalt 1 Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium ISilver ISodium IThallium IVanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration 3340 1 1.4 5.4 189 0.30 3.1 148000 8.2 9.5 35.0 5140 1.7 81900 4180 0.20 21.0 17100 20.5 5.1 1 396000 1 2.7 1 57.1 1 78.6 1 10.0 1 c\ 1 1 Q 1 1 |EN*T 1 U|N 1 Bl 1 Bl 1 >fN*(/ 1 U| 1 JE >r T 1 {Ji 1 Ul 1 IN* r IM- M lEN J- IE T Ul Bl 1 1 IBIN J- lui 1 IE T |U| 1 1 1 1 1U| M ! ! M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV| P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 |P 1 |F 1 IP 1 IP 1 |ASK 1 I Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Reviewed By Date — T e x t u r e : A r t i f a c t s : NO ^ ^ ^ _ '".r; FORM I - IN 303049 ILM02,0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0004 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Ifab Name: PACE Contract: I | LAb Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAAOOl Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/16/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 1 Mil ICAS No. 1 Analyte 1 Concentration!C| Q IM | 1 1 1 M i l 17429-90-5 1 Aluminum | 1560 1 |EN*X IP 1 17440-36-0 1 Antimony | 1.4 |U|N IF | 17440-38-2 lArsenic | 1.8 1B| IF 1 17440-39-3 1 Barium | 131 |B| IP 1 17440-41-7 IBerylliuml 0.60 |>1lW* U31F 1 17440-43-9 icadmium | 3.1 1U| IP 1 17440-70-2 1 Calcium 1 54200 1 IE X |P 1 17440-47-3 [Chromium | 5.9 L&f U 1P 1 17440-48-4 ICobalt 1 9.5 |U| IP | 17440-50-8 ICopper 1 23.1 1B| |P 1 17439-89-6 1 Iron 1 1380 1 |N* X |P 1 17439-92-1 ILead j 3.0 | I (i |F | 17439-95-4 |Magnesium| 37900 | |E X |P 1 17439-96-5 |Manganese| 1000 | I EN X |P 1 17439-97-6 |Mercury | 0.20 |U| |CV| 17440-02-0 INickel 1 21.9 1B| |P 1 17440-09-7 IPotassiumI 1920 |B1 |P I 17782-49-2 1 Selenium | 1.4 |U1NW X |F | 17440-22-4 ISilver 1 5.1 1U| IP 1 17440-23-5 ISodium 1 388000 1 IE X IP 1 17440-28-0 IThallium | 2.7 1U| |F | 17440-62-2 IVanadium | 46.6 |B| |P | 17440-66-6 IZinc | 65.3 | | |P | 157-12-5 1 Cyanide | 10.0 1U| ;g7 |ASr 1 1 1 Mil Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed By ^ ^ _ j ^ / A J i ^ ^ ^ Date — FORM I - IN 303050 050012 ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. C MW0005 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: PACE Contract: 1 j ab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAWOOl Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 1 17440-50-8 1 17439-89-6 | 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony 1 Arsenic j Barium | Beryllium! Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ; Sodium IThallium IVanadium IZinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration! 18500 1 1.4 1 2.1 1 270 1 1.3 1 3.8 148000 23.8 1 82.5 367 28400 17.0 81500 14100 0.20 79.8 4110 1 14.0 I 5.1 1 349000 1 2.7 1 456 1 227 1 10.0 1 C| _l 1 U| B| 1 1 B| 1 U B u u 1 |U 1 1 |U 1... Q 1 EN *X 1 N 1 N* U 1 E 3 N* T E Eh X ' X N X IE T 1 &' M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV| P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 |P 1 |F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 1 ^ :olor Before: YELLOW :olor After: COLORLESS :omments: MUD Clarity Before: OPAQUE Clarity After: CLEAR Revie'.'(cd By - ^ Texture: Artifacts: YES VAUDAJE] Date FORM I - IN 2 303051 050013 ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOlOl INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 'ab Neune: PACE Contract: I | Lab Code: GULF Case No.s HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAW005 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 1 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic j Barium | Beryllium! Cadmium 1 Calcium | Chromium Cobalt 1 Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium IThallium IVanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration 693 1.4 7.7 138 0.20 3.1 47900 5.2 9.5 16.7 678 2.7 32900 1380 0.20 13.1 2310 19.6 5.1 1 406000 1 2.7 1 34.1 1 17.8 1 10.0 1 1 C| Q 1 1 1 !EN*T 1 UlN I Bl 1 Bl 1 UBfNW* U31 U! 1 IE X 1 J31 n 1 Ul lui 1 IN* X [M U 1 IE X 1 lEN X |U| lui IBI |B|NW 3" |U| 1 IE X |U| IBI i>r u lui jr 1 1 M 1 p 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CVI P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 |F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS|( 1 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO ^ FORM I - IN 303052 050014 ILM02.0 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. RBGW02 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 1 I ^T^ab Ncune: PACE Contract: 1 j ijcib Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095022 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: WAW002 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/17/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 ICAS No. 1 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 17440-70-2 1 17440-47-3 1 17440-48-4 1 17440-50-8 1 17439-89-6 | 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum 1 Antimony 1 Arsenic | Barium | Beryllium 1 Cadmium | Calcium j Chromium Cobalt 1 Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium IThallium IVanadium 1 Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration 30.7 1.4 1.1 8.8 0.19 3.1 96.9 4.1 9.5 16.7 32.1 1.1 27.5 3.1 0.20 13.1 526 1.4 5.1 1 339 1 2.7 1 4.5 1 16.7 1 10.0 1 |C l_ LB1 1 1 Q IM 1 1 1 •EN* UJlP 1 |U N IF 1 lU IF 1 |U IP 1 l^'NW*{/XF 1 |U IP 1 LBfE U T I P 1 |U |U |U U»1 1.^1 \x IB |U |U |U |U lu IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 N * R IP 1 r u IF 1 E UXIP 1 EN X IP 1 |CV| IP 1 IP 1 N X IF 1 IP 1 |U|E X IP I lUI IF 1 |U| IP 1 IJ»t U IP 1 |U| m |AS| 1 Mil Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed By Date _ FORM I - IN "Em^ 303053 1750015 ILM02.0 I SO0203 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ib Neone: PACE Contract: ijab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L SDG No.: 095022 Lcib Sample ID: WOOOl Date Received: 02/06/95 I I I 1 |CAS No. 1 Analyte 1 Concentration!C I I I 1 1 1 Q |M 1 . :l 1 17429-90-5 lAluminum I 29.6 LB' EN* U IP 1 17440-36-0 1 Antimony | 1.4 |U 17440-38-2 lArsenic | 1.1 lU 17440-39-3 1 Barium 1 8.8 |U 17440-41-7 IBerylliuml 0.10 lU 17440-43-9 1 Cadmium 1 3.1 lUI 17440-70-2 1 Calcium 1 59.2 LK N IF 1 IF 1 IP 1 N* X 1F 1 IP 1 E 14 IP 1 17440-47-3 1 Chromium 1 5.3 LB'' U |P 1 17440-48-4 ICobalt | 9.5 lU IP 1 17440-50-8 ICopper 1 16.7 lU] IP 1 17439-89-6 1 Iron 1 32.1 lU N* |P | 17439-92-1 ILead | 0.50 |U| |F | 17439-95-4 IMagnesiuml 30.3 [^ E U IP 1 17439-96-5 |Manganese| . 2.6 lU EN IP | 17439-97-6 1 Mercury 1 0.20 \U[ \CV\ 17440-02-0 INickel 1 13.1 lU IP 1 17440-09-7 IPotassiumI 526 |U [P 1 17782-49-2 I Selenium ! 1.4 |U NW X IF | 17440-22-4 ISilver | 5.1 |U IP 1 17440-23-5 ISodium | 339 |UiE LP 1 17440-28-0 IThallium 1 2.7. |U1W X LF 1 17440-62-2 IVanadium 1 4.5 1U| |P 1 17440-66-6 IZinc 1 18.5 LBf U |P 1 157-12-5 1 Cyanide | 10.0 |U| T |AS| 1 1 1 Mil Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed By ^^~}^ijCJL^/ 'ji/iuH^ Date FORM I - IN ^^BBH 303054 "n^ooiB ILM02.0 3 03 055 APPENDIX F Data Validation - May 1995 Groundwater Sampling 303056 OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Project Number: Jason Schindler HLA, Philadelphia Mil^e Phillips M f HLA, Denver July 20, 1995 Island Chemical Company Data Review 29872 10.3 The completed reports for the data validation for the water samples collected May 9 and 10, 1995 as part of the Island Chemical Company Remedial Investigation are enclosed. We will retain copies of the data validation reports for this project as well as the data packages themselves. If you have any questions regarding these reports, please call me at (303)293-6052. MPP/lz • schind.trn Enclosures cc: Brian LaFlamme, HLA Denver Island Chemical Company Project File Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 707 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2400 Denver, CO 80202 - (303) 292-5365 303057 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Case Number: Site: Contractor Lab: Validator: QC Reviewer: Sample Matrix: SDG 95053 Project Number: Island Chemical Company - RI Pace Incorporated, New Orleans, Louisiana Kirsten Meier '^^^Olc/^ "y^yC^C^ Validation Date: Review Date: Water 29872 10.3 June 26, 1995 -7->f~ 9 S ~ Analytical Method: EPA Superfund Low Concentration VOA Method Sample Designations: MWOOOl MWOlOl MW0003 RBGWOO MW0004 TB0509 MW0005 TB0510 Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [\] Acceptable for use as qualified [ ] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The analytical data were reviewed in accordance with the EPA Functional Guidelines, February 1995. via dec. 14 Korm VOA l.l 303058 Disc Number: SDG 95053 Projccl Number: 29S72 10.3 Sile ID: Isbmd Otttnical Company - RI DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative X Surrogate Recovery Summary X MS/MSD Summary * Reagent Blank Summary X GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary Sample Data * Chain of Custody Forms X Holding Times X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data * Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data * Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data X BFB Mass Spectra X Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X BFB Mass Listings v<w_cleo.l4 05I61W5 1330 3 0 3 0 5 9 Case Number: SDG 95053 Projeel Number: 29S72 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Comments: Matrix spikes are not required under the Low Concentration method, however the lab performed MS/MSD and LSC sample analyses. voa dec, 14 0516I9S5 1330 303060 Ca.ie Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Istujd Cliimical Company - RI SPECIFIC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Were custody transfers correctly and completely documented? Yes[x] No Comments: Sample TB0511 was sampled on 5/11/95 and included in the cooler with sample MW0003, however, the lab did not analyze it. Holding Times Were sample analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: None Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Were samples analyzed within the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? Yes[x] No Comments: None vow dec. 14 051619^5 1330 4 Form VOA l.l 3 0 3 0 6 1 Case Number: SDG 95053 Projeel Number: 29r72 10.3 Site ID: Island Ctemical Company - RI Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? Yes[x] No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes No[x] Did the initial calibration meet the minimum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? Yes No[x] Comments: See table "Initial Calibration Summary" for outliers and applied qualifiers. The relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the listed analyte(s) exceeded the upper QC limit of 30.0%. Therefore, the positive detections of these analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). The relative response factors of the listed analytes were less than 0.05. Therefore, positive detections of the listed analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J), while non- detections were qualified as unusable (R). The initial calibration on 5-22-95 was also used as a continuing calibration. No additional qualification was necessary. Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes No[x] Did the continuing calibration meet the minimum RRF criteria? Yes No[x] Comments: See table "Continuing Calibration Summary" for outliers and applied qualifiers. The percent difference (%D) of the listed analyte(s) exceeded the upper QC limit of 30.0%. Therefore, the results for these analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). The relative response factors of the listed analytes were less than 0.05. Therefore, positive detections of the listed analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J), while non- detections were qualified as unusable (R). v*.w_elcc.l4 05i6]995 1330 5 Form VOA I.!. 303062 Case Number: SDC 95053 Projeel Number: 29?72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveries within acceptance limits? Yes[x] No If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No NA[x] Comments: None Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample delivery group (SDG)? Yes[x] No Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: Matrix spike analyses are not required under the Low Concentration method. However, the lab analyzed matrix spikes with the investigative samples and the results are acceptable. Internal Standards Were the internal standard areas and retention times within the required limits? Yes[x] No If the internal standard requirements were not met, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No NA[x] Comments: None vcM dec. 14 05161995 1330 6 l-orm VOA l.l 303063 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Blank Analyses Were the appropriate number of blank analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were analytes detected in the blanks? Yes[x] No If analytes were detected in the blanks, were the same analytes detected in the associated investigative samples? Yes[x] No Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes[x] No Comments: See table "Blank Summary Form" for detections and applied qualifiers. The action levels for the common lab contaminants Methylene Chloride, Acetone and 2-Butanone are 10 times the amount found in the associated blank. For all other analytes the action level is 5 times the amount found in the associated blank. Detections of the listed analytes in the investigative samples below the appropriate action level were qualified as undetected (U). As required by the Functional Guidelines, those results which were less than the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL) were raised to the CRQL. Laboratory Control Samples Were laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses performed at the correct frequency? Yes[x] No Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? Yes[x] No Comments: None voa_clcc.l4 05161995 1330 7 Form VOA l.l 303064 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29g72 10.3 Sile ID: IsUrxi (Thimical Company - RI Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were mass spectra provided for the target analytes detected in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were the mass spectra of acceptable quality and analytes correctly identified? Yes[x] No Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (RRTs) acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: The Ethylbenzene concentrations in the investigative samples MWOOOl and MWOlOl were outside the linear calibration range of the instrument. These reported concentrations have been qualified with an "E" by the lab and have been qualified as estimated (J) by the data reviewer. Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identified compound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? Yes[x] No NA Were non-target peaks evaluated as required? Yes[x] No Were the TIC mass spectra, searches, identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: None v,w_dec. 1 4 05161995 I3.XI 8 Form VOA 1.1 303065 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Log Books Were sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Were sample analyses properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Comments: None VGkl_dcC.14 05161995 1330 9 ' ' Form VOA 1,1 ^03066 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: island Chemical Company - RI Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning, 5-22-95, 1532, 75 m/z Relative Abundance: 4216 x 100% = 56.06 7520 Initial Calibration, 5-22-95, VSTD005, Acetone RRF: ( 6560 ) X ( 5 ) ( 77826 ) X ( 25 ) %RSD: 0.00167 X 100% = 9.3 0.018 Continuing Calibration, 5-19-95, 1708, Acetone RRF: ( 8723 ) X ( 5 ) ( 82498 ) X ( 25 ) %D: 0.020-0.021 X 100% = -5.0 0.020 Surrogate Recovery, MWOOOl, Bromofluorobenzene % Recovery: 4.635 X 100% = 92.7 0.017 0.021 v(w dec. I 4 05161995 1330 1 0 FomiVOALI 303067 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29r72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Lab Control Spike Recovery, VLCSOl, Benzene % Recovery: 5.270-0 X 100% = 105.4 Sample Results, MWOOOIDL CRQL: 1.0 ug/1 X 5 = 5 ug/1 Detected Result for Ethylbenzene ( 365214) X ( 5 ) ( 56219) x( 1.539) TIC Result, Unknown, RT = 4.15 ( 153550 ) X ( 5 ) ( 207589 ) X ( 1 ) X 5 = 105.528 X 5 = 18.492 vou_dec.l4 05161995 1330 303068 (•^..^c Number: SlXi 9.5053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site II): Island Clxjmical Company - RI HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM w o w o a\ vo Sample Identification Date Sampled Date Analyzed Analysis Holding Time Qualifier v,xi_ek-c.l4 ()51619-)5 13.10 Form VOA 1.1 ( V.se Number: SLKl 95053 I'rojcil Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID; Island Cltmitsil Company - RI INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM w o o <I o Date/Time 1 1/31/95 5/22/95 Instrument F F Analyte Methylene Chloride Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone RF 0,02 0.023 0.049 0.018 0.021 0.043 RSD 60.8 48.9 33.2 37.3 Qualified Samples None TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB05I0 MWOlOl, RBGWOO, MWOOOIDL, MWOIOIDL, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 MWOlOl, RBGWOO, MWOOOIDL, MWOIOIDL, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 MWOlOl, RBGWOO, MWOOOIDL, MWOIOIDL, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 Qualifier - R R R J/R R R voa_dec, 14 05161995 1330 13 Case Number: SIXi 95053 Projeel Number: 29872 10.3 .Site tt): /sianj i'hc^iul drmpttny - H! CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIRCATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time 5/19/95, 1708 5/23/95, 1231 Instrument F F Analyte Acetone 2-Butanone Chloroethane Methylene Chloride 1,1-Dichloroethane Bromoform Methylene Chloride Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone RF 0.021 0.021 0.023 0.019 0.039 %D -34.6 41.8 -32.3 38.7 -44.6 Qualified Samples TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB05I0 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 TB0509, MWOOOl, TB0510 MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 Qualifier R R R R R 00 o VLW_dec. 1 4 05161995 1330 Form VOA 1.1 Case Number: SIXI 9.5053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile II): IslaiW Chemical Company - RI BLANK SUMMARY FORM CO o u> o lO Blank ID 1 VBLKOI 1 VBLK02 1 VBLK03 1 VBLK04 Analyte Methylene Chloride Methylene Chloride 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1.2-Dichlorobenzene Methylene Chloride Methylene Chloride Blank Result (ug/1) 0.8 2 5 3 1 2 0.7 Action Level (ug/1) 8 20 25 15 5 20 7 Qualified Samples TB0509, TB0510 RBGWOO None None None MW0004, MW0005 None viw_dcc. 14 05161995 1330 15 Form VOA 1.1 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29r72 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Summary and Conclusions The volatile organic results for SDG 95053 were found to be acceptable for use as qualified. Sample TB0511 was not analyzed by the lab. The relative response factors for Acetone, 2-Butanone and 2-Hexanone were less than 0.05 in the initial calibration on 1-31-95. Therefore, the undetected results for these analytes in the investigative samples TB0509, MWOOOl and TB0510 were qualified as unusable (R). The relative response factors for Acetone, 2-Butanone and 2-Hexanone were less than 0.05 in the initial calibration on 5-22-95. Therefore, the undetected results for these analytes in the investigative samples MWOOOIDL, MWOIOIDL, MWOlOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 and RBGWOO were qualified as unusable (R), while the detection of Acetone in the investigative sample RBGWOO was qualified as estimated. In the continuing calibration on 5-19-95 the percent difference values for Chloroethane, Methylene Chloride, 1,1-Dichloroethane, and Bromoform exceeded the QC criteria of 30.0%. Therefore, the results for these analytes in the investigative samples TB0509, MWOOOl and TB0510 were qualified as estimated (J). The relative response factors for Acetone and 2-Butanone were below 0.05 in the continuing calibration on 5-19-95. Therefore, the non-detections of Acetone and 2-Butanone in the investigative samples TB0509, MWOOOl and TB0510 were qualified as unusable (R). In the continuing calibration on 5-23-95 the percent difference value for Methylene Chloride exceeded the QC criteria of 30.0%. Therefore, the results for this analyte in the investigative samples MW0003, MW0004 and MW0005 were qualified as estimated (J). The relative response factors for Acetone, 2-Butanone and 2-Hexanone were below 0.05 in the continuing calibration on 5-23-95. Therefore, the non-detections of these analytes in the investigative samples MW0003, MW0004 and MW0005 were qualified as unusable (R). Blank contamination was observed for Methylene Chloride in the investigative samples TB0509, TB05I0, RBGWOO, MW0004 and MW0005. The reported detections were qualified as undetected (U) and the reporting limits were raised to the CRQLs. The ethylbenzene concentrations in the investigative samples MWOOOl and MWOlOl exceeded the linear calibration range of the instrument. These results were qualified as estimated (J). Validator's Signature: 4 + 5 ^ ^ ^ K U - L A Validator's Initials: I'V'l Validation Date: C>-2C> - ' f S QC Reviewer's Signature: ^ ^ ? 9 u A C ^ ^ ^ /''^^^^A^^^^^ QC Reviewer's Initials: Z ^ / ' / ' Review Date: 7 - 11 ~ 9 ^ 303073 viw_eti:c. 14 05161995 l?30 16 I-ormVOAL! V :i.i,..CA LQI,..! r:nNC,. WATER Viu.A T I I . E : OFVGAMTCS ANALYSTS ' DATA SHEET L a b i-l.ame:: EyC/GUL.F SOUTM lAji'i t r - : 7 t c t : E P H SAPIPLE i-K:), 'I WOOOl (•II..IL.F-' Ca: i-ic:. •ii.A M ( j SDi.v a O ';:iaili IJ I. C; I D : XGUOOl. D a t e 1 / v l ..ab F:i. l e I D : '^?.XGU01 •'LI. r q e Vo ]. yxme ;: 2 5 ..0.0..._ ('>'' '• ) D a t e A n a l y z e d ; 0 5 , / 1 9 / 9 0 :i. 1 L( t i. -Jn Fa c I.-.or: 1 . 0 CAS:) IMG, CGi'iF'tjtjHD 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 — - 7^;.~01-4 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 •j 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 3 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 - — 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 V vD - .1. .<_••(:> Chi c.i r c!' m e t f i a ri e B r (j in o 111 G t h .a n e V i. n y 1 G h 1 o r i d e G h 1 o r o e t hari e _ _ _ Methylene Chloride Ace ton e_ Cey r bon D i su 1 f i d e 1 , 1 - D : L c h l o r o e t l ^ e n e 1 , 1 - D i c; h 1 o r o e t h a r i e C 3 . S - 1 , 2 - D i c l T l o r o e t ) - i e n e '_ t r a n T> — 1,21 •• •• D :i. c h 1 o r o e t h e n e C i l l o r o f o r m 1 , 2 ~ D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 2 - B u t a n o n e Bromochioromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2—Tr ichloroethar^e Benzene t r a n s - l , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e Bromo"form 1 , 2 - D i t ) r o m o e t h a n e 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - F ' e n t a n o n e 2 -Ilexanon6?_ Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2—1etrachloroethane Toluene Chlorobenzene . _ Ethylbenzene Styrerie X y l e n e ( t o t a l ) 1 , 3 - D i cl>lorot.ien z e n e 1,4-Dichloroben zene 1 ,2—Di c l i l o r o b e n zc^ne 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e GONCENTRATIGH (uq/L) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 o 1 1 1 1 (•,' u LI U T U l J^K U U UJ U U U u jd'k LI U U U U U U / i i M U u u u / i;,.;u1 u u u u u u u u l.J u o ro O ro FGRI1 I LCV 1 0 / 9 2 1I...CE J::M GCJHC. WATER VGLATILE GRGANTGS ANALY9:I:S DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY I D E N T I F I E D GGI'IF'GUNDS i...a b ITaine:; liiTC/GlJEF SGUTH l...ab C o d e : RUL,F_ C a s e N o . : HLA L a b S a m |:i I. e ID : XGUOOl __ L a b F i l e I D : VOXGUOl l-'urqe V<:)lunie: 2 5 , 0 0 ( m l ) EPA SAMPLE NO, tWOOOl Con t r a c t : _ SAS N o , . : _ SDG N o . . : 9 5 0 5 3 D a t e Re(;:eived : 0 . 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 D a t e A r i a l y z e d : 0 5 / 1 9 / 9 5 I> i 1 u t .1. o n F a c. t c> r • .1.0 Iu111 be r T1C-^ f o u n d : 1 CAS NUriBER 1 . COMPOUND NAl'lE :UNKNOWN RT 4 „ 2 0 ; [ST,. CGNC. ( u q / L ) 31 ; J 3 03 07 5 FORfl I LCV T I G 1 0 / 1L.CA l._GW GONG. WATER VOI..ATILE ORGANICS ANALYST;;; DATA SHEET L.ab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH ("cji'i trai::t E P A SA|-»iPLE WG,. I .1..' Lab Code: GULF G<: No. HLA Lab Sample ID: XGy009;___ L.ab Fj.le ID: yOX(;0Ug9R_ P u r q e V o 1 u i li e : 2 5 . O O^ _ (ii i T ) Date Received: Q5/12/'95 Date Analyzed: 05/1VV/95 D i 1 u t i on Fa c t o r : l.j^ 0 CONCENTRATION GAS NO. COHF'OUND I, uq/L; 74-37-3 74-83-9 7 5-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-59-2 156-60-5 67-66-3 107-06-2 78-93-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 56-23-5 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5 79-01-6 124-48-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6 75-25-2 106-93-4 108-10-1 591-78-6 127-18-4 79-34-5 108-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4- 100-42-5 1330-2O-7 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 96-12-8 •Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane I'le t h y l e n e C h 1 o r i d e Acetone Carbon Disul f ide 1,1 - D i c h 1 o r o e t h e ri e 1 ,1-Dichloroetharie cis-l, 2-Di chloroethene ._ trans-l ,2~Di chloroetht>ne Chloroform 1,2-D i ch1o roe t bane _ 2-Butanone Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane c i s-1,3-D i c h1o ro p ro pen e Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane^ Ben zene trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 1,2-Di b r o m o e t h a n e 4—llethyl—2—F'en t a n o n e 2 - H e x a n o n e Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2, 2-Te t.rachIoroetliane___ Toluene_ Chlorobenzene E t f^ y 1 b e n z e n e Styrene Xylene (total) _ 1 , 3 - D i e hi o r o Lien zene 1,4 -D i c h 1 o r o l:>en z en e _ •1 , 2-D:i c h l o r o b e n zeru;^ _ 1 , 2-Di bromo -3 -<::bloi-0|3r (jpane ^> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0. 1 1 o ;u ; u j ;u :u ;u3 ;u ; u ;u :L^ AK :u ;u :u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u :uj • I l y i^*^. ;u Ak :u ;u ;u ;u ;u : LI ;u :u • : J ! ' I :u nr>' / ^ • ^ c Si m 0) o ro o CO a l"ORfl I LCV 10.- 1I...GE 1...0W f:;ON(:;. WATii;;R VOI,..AIII...E ORGAH;I:GS ANAI...Y:-;/I:S D A T A siiEET T E. N T A TIV i:;: L Y J. D E. H 1 1 F 1 E . D G 0 N F 0 U N is S E P A SAr'IPL..E N O . L a b Na(ue ;; ETC/GlJIj;; 'OTtllJi... _._. Lab Code: GliL£ Case No,.: HLA., Lab Sample ID: XGy009_ Lab File ID: y.0XGy09R l"'i..i.rqe V o l u m e : 2.5..r.^•?.0.... (fi^I) Contract ;::,I-K:> I I Q . TB0509 : _._ SDG No.: 95^053_ Date Received: OS/liilZZ^ Date Analyzed: 05/19/95 D i 1. u 11 on Fa c to r : 1.0 Number TIGs found: CAS NIJMBER COMPOL.IND NANE RT EST. CONC. ( u q / L ) Q o ^ I m I 303077 FORM I LCV-TIC 1 0 / 9 2 II...GA ..OW CONG. WATCR VOi._ATII...E (TRGANIGS ANALYSIiii DATA SHEET (...ab Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Con tract EPA SA|-'iPl...E NO.. TB05I0 Lab Code: GUL,F._ Case No. I._ab Sample ID: XHH0(>4__ Lab File ID: y(;]lXhlH04 Purqe Volume: 2.5_-.0.0.„ Onl) CAS NO. COIIF'OUND D a t e R e c : e i v e d : 05^/.l.;<^Zz.'2 D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 5 / 1 9 / 9 5 D :i. I yx t :i. oi > F a c t o r : L?..Q CONCENTRATION ( u q / L ) Q 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 — 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 - — 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 — 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 — 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 — 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 — 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 — 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 — 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 — 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 — 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 — 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 - 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 — 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 — 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 -Chloromethane •Bromome t h a n e •Vinyl C h l o r i d e • C h l o r o e t h a n e •Methylene C h l o r i d e A c e t o n e •Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene •1,1-Di chloroethane cis-l,2—Dichloroethene ; trans-l ,2—Di chloroethiene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Tri chloroethene Dibromochl orome thari& 1,1,2—Trichloroethane Ben zene trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 1,2—Dibromoethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2—Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t l i a n e ? T o l u e n e Chlorobenzene Ethyl ben z en e Styrene Xylene (total) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 ,2-Dibromo--3-chloropropane 1 ; LI 1 : u 1 ; u 1 ; u j 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; LI ; : u • ; ;u3 ; ;u ; ; u ; ; u ;. ;u : A K : :u : :u ; :u ! ; u ;u : , :u : \ ;u ; l u / i S l ^ ' :u 'Q • ' UJ •UJ - H u :^ FORM I LCV 10/9:: ILCE LOW CONG. WATER VOI...ATILE ORGANICS AilALYSIS DATA SHEET T'ENT AT" T VEL Y I DENT T FI E.D G O N F T J U N OS 10, .._al:j Name: E;r£/.Q}:ML.^lMni L.ab Code: GULF _ Case No,,: HLA Lab Slample ID: >T;IH004 Lab F i l e ID: yOXHH04 F'urge Volume: 2 5 . 0 0 (nil) ("on ti'a(::t: 'EiO510 : _ ;:).\.'l..' r l i . i - : '•-'.;; -i/..^. Datis' R e c e i v e d : 0 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 Date A n a l y z e d : 0.!;>/.1.5Z?.^ D :L I u t i ori Fa •:.: t o r : 1 . O v|urii !;;• e r T![ Cs f ound : CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME f<T EST. CGNC, ( u q / L ) a V s3 \ 0) QC a 303079 ForvM I Lcv-ric 10/92 I L C A I...OW GONG. WATER VfJLATILE ORGANICS A N A L Y S I S DATA SiTF EPA SANFT...E NO, ; . ' ; • , ' '. ' • i...ab Name: ETG/GULF SOUTH God.; GULF ..ab Sample ID: XHH009... ab File ID: V0XHH09 C a s e N o . : I-I Griri ti'-act;: SAS Nr-i D a t e R e c e i v e d D a t e Ar'ialyzed SDG No, V ?."'"> '.'.''-.5 0 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 0 5 / 2 3 / 9 5 F" u r q e V o I u (n e !5.00._ ( m l ) D i l u I.'..i.ori c;l:.Qr 1 .. 0 CA NO. 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 - — 7 4 - 3 3 - 9 - — 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 - — 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 - — 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 - — 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 — 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 "78-87 1 0 0 6 1 7 9 - 0 1 1 2 4 - 4 8 0 1 - 5 4 :— 6 4 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 — 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 1 0 8 - 1 0 5 9 1 - 7 8 1 2 7 - 1 8 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 — 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 — 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 — 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 — 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 - 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 — 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 — 9 5 - 5 0 - l ~ - 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 - - COMPOUND -C h i orovne t h a n e -Bromomethane -Vinyl Chloride -Chloroethane -Methylene Ch 1 oride —Acetone _ -Carbon Disulfide -1,1-Di chloroethene -1,1-Dichloroethane_ -cis-l,2-Dichloroethene , -trans—1,2—Di chloroethene -Chloroform -1,2-Dichloroethane _ -2-Butanone -Bromochloromethane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane -1,2-Dichloropropane _ -cis-l ,3--Dichloropropene -Trichloroethene -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2-Tri chloroe?thane -Benzene -trans—1,3—Dichloropropene -E<romoform _ - 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o e t f » a n e _ - 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - F ' e n t a n o n e - 2-FIe X an on e - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e - 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h I o r o e t l i a n e - T o l u e n e -Chloroben ze?ne -Ethylbenzene -Styrene -Xylene (total) -1,3-Di chloroben zene - 1 , 4 - D i c h l o r c : ) b e n z e n e - 1 ,2—D i c h 1 o r o b e r > z e n e - 1 , 2 - D :\. b romo - 3 -ch I o r o i) r c T p a n e GGi-iGENTRATION ( i..i.q/I... ) Fi 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 .1 1 1 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 _ __ ; 1.1 ;u ;u ;u AK ; u ;u ;LI :u ;u ; u / \u AK ;u ; u / . :u :u ;u ;u ;u - :u ;u :u :u :u :u A^ ;u :u ;u ;u ;u ;u 9 ; J :u ;u ; 1.1 :u _.. 1 > ; '-"'''I - * f i ' ' \ A^ •'ORM I LCV o 00 o ro o ro 1 0 / 9 2 J.I...GE LOW GONG- WATER VOL. AT I LE ORGANICS ANA1...YSIS DATA SHEET Ti;:;IT T A T T V E . F Y :I:DFT• I r i i ~ i F : D GOH!"• (JUI-ID:•; EI-'A SAMPLE NO, i._ata ITaine : EJC/GUTLJ;; liiiOUTH I...ab Code: GULF Case No..: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH009 I...ab File ID: yiJXHi::l09_ l-'urqe Vi:::ilume: 25.00 (m] ) "'i WO 0 0 3 C o n T.i''.ac i;.: SAS No,.: _.._.. SDG No..: 950.53. Date R e c e i v e d : 05/JU2/.9.5 Date A n a l y z e d : 0 5 / 2 3 / 9 5 D i. I yx t i >:i r i i' a c. t o r : .1 .0 Hum bier TIiSs found CAS NUr-IBER 1 . COMPOUND NAME :UNKNOWN RT 18.15 EST. CONC. ; ( u c i / L ) ; Q 0'\ \ CD 1 IS 303081 FORM I LCV-TIC 10/9^ TI..(:::A ...OW G O N G . W A T E R VOI...ATII...I:;; GI::;GANIGS AITAI...YSIS D A T A S H E E T ,..aI;) ITame : I::TG,/GIJLT; SOITTTT ..ab C o d e : G.UL£ C a s e hlo. : HLA .. a I:) ;:>am \:> I e I D : XjTH003; _ ..ab F i l e I D : y.QXFIrlOo •'urq(-3 Volume-?: 2 . 5 . 0 0 _ ( m l ) Go I'l t r a c : t >Mo r-io. EF'A SAMF1...E liG. Li'.') 0 0 0 4 '„ _ SDG H o . : 950.5.3.. D a t e Re CO i v e i l : 0.5/12./9 5 D a t e A i ' i a l y z e d : Q 5 / 2 3 / 9 5 Di. 1 u t ioI'l F'ac tc> 1- : 1 ,. 0 CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ( u q / L ) Q 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 -Chlorc:imetharie_ -Bromome t han e - V i n y l C f i l o r i d e -Chloroethane -Me thyl 6?ne? C Li 1 or i d e -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide -1,1-Dichloroethene -1,1-Di chloroethane -cis-l,2-Dichloroethene -trans-l,2-Dichloroethene -Chloroform -1,2-Dichloroethane -2-Butanone -Bromochloromethane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane -1,2-Dichloropropane -cis-l,3-Dichloropropene -Trichloroethene -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2-Tri chloroethane -Benzene -trans-l,3-Dichloropropene -Bromoform -1,2-Di bromoethane -4—Methyl ~2—F'en tanone -2-Hexanone -Tetrachloroethene -Toluene -Chlorobenzene -Ethylbenzene -Styrene - X y l e n e ( t o t a l ) -1,3—Dicf»lorot)en z e n e - 1 , 4 — D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e -1,2—Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e - 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r c ^ p a n e ._ FORM I LCV 1 1 .1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'a 5 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;u ; i . j : u :u ! LI : u I LI ;u •MV 'A I ' . - ' / i / ' f - i ;u ;u/i//o/r : u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u A^ ;u ;u ; i.i ;u ;u ; I..I :u ; LI ;u ; LI ;iT 10 /.»'' o a b J ^ ON:' rx ^<j CD I 00 o CO o ro 1I...GE EPA SAl" I...OW GONG. WATER V G L A T I L E ORGANICS ANAI...YSIS DATA SFIEET T E N T A r i V E L Y IDENT:i:FIi;rD GGrlF'Gi.iHDS -i(j . 1...a I:) Name : EJC/G}Jl£_SO}JTH _ L.ab C o d e : G.ULF C a s e N o . : HLA L a b S a m p l e I D : XHHG0.3 L.ab F i l e I D : yOXHH03 P u r q e Voluiiie: 25-0.0 (i»I) Con 1;.rai;:: i: '"•• T \ {"• I. I ... ,. f"' r.: ,-., i:: ••.* '•'•I- ' I I ' J - : ; / . . . ' ' : . > • . . ; • . . > Date l-<e<::e:i.ved : Q'^-!/}2Z7^.!^'. Date Analyzed: 05/23/95 D i Iu t ion Fac to r : .1. » 0 Number TICs foi.ind : CAS NUMBER 1 . r;OMPOLIND MAI'iE ;UNKNOWN RT 1 8 . 3 0 EST - CONC. ( u q / L . ) Q a UJ < a \? CD 1 303083 FORM I l.,GV TIC 1 0 / 9 2 il.CY'i EPA SAMPL.E NO. LOW GONC;,. WATEF< V O L A T I L E ORGANIGS A N A L Y S I S DATA SFIIHTHIT ._ab HAmo : ET.C./.GyL,F SOUTH _.. ..ab Code: GULE Case No„: HLA ..a I:) Saiii o I. e ID: XHHOO2 _ ..ab File ID: y.0XHH02 ••l.l.rqe Volume: 25.00. (ml) ; MW0005 Con trac L : _ _ _ ; _ _ SAS Nci. : SDG No. : 95053_ Date f:;eceived: 05/.1.2/9.5 Date Analyzed: 05/23/95 Di. 1 l.ltion FacT.or : 1.0 CONCENTRATION GAS NO. iSOMPOUND ( u q / L ) Q 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 3 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 — 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 - C h i orome t l i a n e -Bromomethane — V i n y l C h l o r i d e - C h l o r o e t h a n e —t'lethylene C h l o r i d e - A c e t o n e -Carbon Disulfide -1,1-Dichloroethene -1,1-Dichloroethane -cis-l,2-Dichloroethene ^ -trans-l,2-Dichloroethene -Chloroform -1,2-Di chloroethane -2-Butanone —Bromochloromethane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromod i chloromethane -1,2-Dichloropropane -cis-l,3-Dichloropropene -Trichloroethe^ne -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2-Trichloroethane -Ben zene -trans-l,3-Dichloropropene -Bromoform - 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o e t h a n e - 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - P e n t a n o n e -2—Hexanone - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e - 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e - T o l u e n e -C 111 o r oben zene -Ethylbenzene -Styrene -Xylene (total) -1,3—Dichlorobenzene -1,4—Dichlorobenzene -1 ,2-Di chloroben zene -1,2-D ibromo~3--chloropropane FORM I LCV 10/92 TL.GE EPA SAMPL.E HO. L.OW GONG. WATER VOLATILE ORGANIGS ANALYSIS DATA SFIEET TENTATIVELY TDENTir-IED COMPOUNDS 1 ; MWOOO5 Lab Name: EiC/GUFF SOUTH , Contract: '. L.al:i Code: GULP _. Case No. Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Lab File ID: yOXHH02 F'urge Vcjlurne: 2.5 r (>3 (ml) SAS N o . : ...._ SDG N o , . : 9 5 0 5 3 . D a t e Re.:;:eived : 0.5/1S../95. Da -te Ari a I y z ed : 0 5 / 2 3 / 9 5 D:i. 1 u t :i. on Fa.c. -G:JI- : 1 - 0 N u m f j e r T I O J ; f o u n d CAS MUI'IBER COMPOUND NAME f.:T EST., CONG ( u q./1...) y -V- V3 I m T3 5 (U t QC. <1> % O 303085 FORM I L C V - T I C . 0 / 9 2 I._0W GONC- WATER VGL.ATIL.E ORGANIGS ANAI._YSIS DATA SHEET .ab N a m e : ETC/GUL.F' SGUTl-l Con t r a c t ; l::T--'A SAMF'LE! NO. i ; o d e GI..IL.r" (:;a HL.i WF> No V50 5 3 ami:* I L < : D.--. i(-' i v e c i -ri y c . j r : ..ab F i l e ID: VOXHHOl D a t e Aria l y z e d •'urqe Vci'lume: ( M l ; i . ) Di lu'l.iori c t o r : CAS NO. 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 — 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 - - 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 — 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 - 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 - 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 3 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 - - 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 - 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 - 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 -- i:;GMF'OUND CONCENTRATIOf ( u q / L ) Q -C Li I o I'ome t h a n e - B I- o I h o m e t h an e _ - V i n y l C f i l o i - i d e - G l ' i l o r o e t h a n e ••• M e t h y 1 e n e C h 1 o r i d e -Acetone_ - C a r b o n D i s u l f i d e - 1 , 1 - D i c il 1 o r o e t h e n e • 1 , l - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e - c i s - l , 2 - D i c h 1 o r o e t h e n e ^_ - t r a n s - l , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h i e n e _ _ . -Chloroform -1,2-Dichloroethane -2-Butanone -Bromochioromethane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride -Bromodichloromethane -1,2—Dichloropropane -cis-l,3—Dichloropropene -Tri cfiloroet bene -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2—Trichloroethane -Ben zene - t r a n s - l , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e -E<romof o r m - 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o e t l i a n e - 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - F ' e n t a n o n e - 2 - F l e x a n o n e - Te t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e -1 , 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c l i l o r o e t l i a n e - T o l u e n e - C h i o r o ber> z e n e - E t h y l b e n z e n e -£>tyr e n e - X y l e n e ( t o t a l ) -1 , 3—Di ctilc.u'oben zerie -1 ,-'l-Dichlorc.iben z e n e -1 ,2-1) i c li 1 o r o ben z en e - 1 , 2 - D 1 bromo - 3 - ch 1 o r o p r opai i e FORM LCV 1 0 / 9 2 EPA SAMPLE NO- L.GW GONG- WATER VOLATIL.E ORGANliCS ANALYSIS DATA SFIEET T F;NT'ATIVF:L.Y :I:DFTM T II--'IED i::ijMI-'fJI.II-IDS _aI;:. Name: li^TG./GULF SOUTH _ ..ab Gcide: GUL.F Case NcL. : HLA ..alj Sample I'D:: Xj:l!::!001 .ab F i l e I D : VlTXHH.Ol..., " u r g e V o l u m e : 2 5 - 0 p _ ( m l ) Co i'l 'tract; RBGWOO : _ _._ _ SDG Nc:... : 9 5 0 5 3 D a t e R e c e i v e d : 0 5/12/.95^ D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 5 / 2 3 . / 9 5 Di. 1 u t :i.c^n I"ac t a r " : 1 . O •lumLier" T I C s "i-ouricL: CAS NUMBE:F< COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC ( u q / L ) Q 303087 FORM I LCV-TIC 10/«, :i.l...GA L.OW CONG- WATER VOL.ATILE 0I'«3ANICS ANAL.YSI:;;;: DATA SHEET Lal:> l-Tai'iie : !H;TC./GUL,l5_..S0yTH L.ab C o d e : GyLi" Ca-^o N o . . : HLFi, L a b ;;>ample I D : XGy0.02 L.ab F i l e I D : y.C:iXGy02R2 F'u I' q e ''v'o I unie : 2 5 . 0 0 ( m i ) GAS NO. COMPOUND C o n t r a c t : S(^:i EPA SAMPLE NO- MWOJ.Ol D::\'l'.e fvlecei. SDG N o - : 9 5 0 5 3 d : 0 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 •r'-. .. .1. ... A .- _ 1 . .™ «. ..I . .'-•. i:: /'•••-.•' / r y e : L><:K i.e i-inct.i./zei.i: V.x.i •tl-.^^jL.z.j^l D:i. I u t :i.cii'i F : ^ c t o r : .l...,,-..0 CONCENTRATION ( U Q / L ) Q 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 7 4 - 8 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 — 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 — 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 — - 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 6 7 " 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 - 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 - 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 - 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 — 5 9 1 - 7 B - 6 - 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 — 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 -- 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 — 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 - 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 -- 9 6 - 1 2 - 8 --- - C h l o r o m e t h a n e _ _ -B romome t han e _ _ _ - V i n y l C l ' i l o r i d e -Chloroethane -'Mt? t fiy!l. en e C li :i. o r i d e —Ace'tone _ - C a r b o n D i s u I f :i. d e - 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e -' 1 , 1 - D i c h 1 o r o e^ t h a n e - c i s - l , 2 - D i c h I o r o e tI'lene - 1 r a r i s - 1 , 2 - D i ch 1 o r o e t L i e n e - l ' 3 h l o r o f orm - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e "thane - 2 - B u t a n o n e -Bromochloromethane -1,1,1-Trichloroethane -Carbon Tetrachloride --Bromod i c h 1 o rome t han e -1,2-Dichloropropane -cis-l,3-Dichloropropene -Trichloroethene -Dibromochloromethane -1,1,2—Trichloroethane -Benzene - t r a n s - l , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e - E i r o m o f o r m - 1 , 2 - D i t j r o m o e t h a n e - 4 — M e t h y l - 2 - F ' e n t a n o n e - 2 -Flex an o n e -Tetrachloroethene -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -Ti'jluene - C h l o r o b e r i z e n e - E t h y l b e n z e n e - S t y r e n e _.. -Xylene ( tot.al ) -1,3-DLchlorobenzene _ -1,4-Dichlorobenzene - 1 , 2--Di cfilorot.'en z e n e - 1 , 2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 U U U L.l A\\ LI U U U U U U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u A ^ u u u u ca IJ u u u u F"ORM I LCV 1 0 / 9 . :i.LCE I...OW CONG- WAFER VOLATILE ORGANIGS ANALYSIS DATA Sl-IEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS L.a b Name : ETC/GJlf SOU.!H. L.ab Code: GULP Case No.: HLA L.a I:) Sam p I e 1D: X(jU002 __ _ L a b F i l e I D : yOXGy02R2....._ r-'urge V o l u m e : 2 . 5 . 0 0 _ ( m l ) Cori t r a c t :;;:,f 1S I'TCj , :PA SAMPLE LIO. iTLOi.Ol SDG N o . : 9 50 53 D a t e R e c e i v e d : O . a / 1 2 / 9 5 D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 5 / 2 3 / 9 5 D i :i. u I', i o n F a i;:; t o r : .1 „ 0 i-ludiber T I C s fot.tnd CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME [UNKNOWN ; E S T . CONC- ; RT ; ( u q / L ) : Fj 4 . 1 0 ; 25 ; J 303089 FORM I L C V - T I C 1 0 / 9 2 T1...CA LOW G O N G - WATET'; V O L . A T I L E (Ji-'iGANI(:;:;:> ANAI...YSIS D A T A ::;$!-ii;;T;::T EF'A SAi'lF'L.E L I O . M W O I O I D L ...alj Nan-ie : E T C / G U L F ;;;5.0yTH ..ab C o d e : G U L F _ C a s e N o - : ,..ab S a m p l e I D : X G y 0 0 . 2 D L . ..ab F i l e I D : y O X . G y 0 2 R • ' u r q e V c j i u m e : 2J5..00 ( m l ) f'^oI'l L r a c : t : rlL.i^- S A S ITo >DG ITo - : 9 5 0 5 3 D a Le R e c e i ' v o d : 0 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 Date Dilu'l' C A S N O - 74- 74- 7 5- 75- 7 5- 6 7 - 75- 75- 7'5- 156 1 56 6 7 - 107 7 8 - 7 4 - 7 1 - 56- 75- 7 8 - 37- 33- 01- 00- 09- 64- 1 5- 35- 34- -5'7 -6C 66- -0<f 93- 97- 55- 27- 87- 10061- 79- 124 79- 7 1 - 01- -48 00- 43- 10061- 75- 106 108 591 127 7 9 - 103 108 100 lOO 133 541 106 95- 96- 25- -97 -10 -7a -19 34- -38 -90 -41 -42 0-2 -73 -46 50- 12- •3 - -9 4^ -3 ' JC:. 1 - 0 — — •4 -:r__ .._o »-5 .3 ,-2 3 5 ^^ •5 4 5 01-5 6 — J. 5 02-6 -4 -1 -6- -4 5 - 3 - - -7 -4 -5 0-7 -1 - - -7 1 0 ] 1 ] , 1 < > COMI-'OUND C h 1 o I" o m e 't r i a n e B I'' om o m e x h a n e V :i n y ii. C b 1 o v i cl e y.. 1"! I o I'' o e L h a |-1 e r ' l e t h y l e r i e C b l i j r i d e A c e t o ri e _ _ _ _ G a I" b o n D i Hi I .LL'r ;i. d e 1 , , 1 — D X c. b I o r o o t l"i e n e _ 1 , l - D i . i:::l'ilcirc:ie'tharie c i 'B — 1 , 2 - D i c I "I I o r o e t h e n e t r a I "1 s — 1 ., 2 - D ;i. c b I o r ci e t fi e n e _ C h 1 o r' o 'f f :i r p I'l _ 1 , 2 - D i c l ' i l o r o e t h a n e 2-Butanoi"ie BromocLi 1 orome thane 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c l i l c j r i - i e t h i a n e C a r b o n T e11- a c l i 1 o r i d e B r o m o d i c li 1 o r o t n e t b a n e A n a 1 y z e d : 0 5 / 2 2 , / 9 5 i o r ' i F a c t o r : 1 0 C O N C E N T R A T I O N ( u q / L ) O 1 , 2 - D i c l i l o I- o p r o p a n e c i s - l , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e T r i c h l o r o e t Lien e D i b r o m o c h l o r o m e t h a n e 1 , 1 , 2 - T r :i. c l i l c i r o e t h a n e B e n z e n e t r a n s - l , 3 - D i ( - L i l o r o f j r o p e n e B r o m o f o r m 1 , 2 - D j . b i - c j m o e tl'iai'ie 4 -Me tfiy 1 2 l-'ei"i tanonv? 2—I'le X ari o n e _ T e t r a c l " i I o r ' ( ' : i e t i i e i i e 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 " T e t r a c f i l o r o t j t h a r \ e _ T(-)). u e i ' i e C h I o r'Cj b e n z eri o? E t | - i y l b e n z e n e S t y r e n e X y l e n e ( t o t a l ) 1 , 3 -D:i. (:;LiI(:ir\:iberi z e n e _ 1 , 4 - 1 ) i c h l i . 1 r i)l.lei> / e n o 1 , 2 - D i c h Ti:.>r i.iber\ zer>e 1 , 2 - D i I:) I - Cl III o - .V (: h 1 o r o |:> r ci p a n e 10 10 10 10 20 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 1.0 100 10 5 10 10 10 10 " ~ 1 Ll ; u ;u ;u 111 A^ \ I..I ;u ;u ;u ; LI :u :u •jwK ', u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u :u :u :u ;u ;u :u ;u ;XR ;u ;u ;u ;u :D ;u ; D J :u :u ; t.i ;u •ORM I i...i::;v 1 0 / 9 2 TI...CE L.OW GONG- WATER VOLATIL.E ORGANIGS ANALYSIS DATA SFIEET T E N T A T I V i;^l... Y I D E. IT T' 11-' I E D Cli M F' (J Li IT D S FT-'A SAMF'L.i; 10 , ... a b IT a m e : E XQ / o y ^ j ; ; ; S OU T H ..ab C o d e : GLJLF. C a s e N o - : HLA _ab S a m p l e I D : XGy0.02DI.,, ..ab F i l e I D : yOXGy02.R.._ •'urge Vi:jli..i.irie: 2.5.-_.00 ( m l ) (!;oi-i t i ' a ' i i t : NWOIOlDL : SDG N o . : 95.053 D a t e R e c e i v e d : 0.5./.12/.95 D a t e A n a l y z e d : 0 5 / 2 2 / 9 5 D :i. 11..I. t i oI"1 F a c t c j | - : .1.0 lumtiier TIGi;;. f o u n d CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME ;UNKNOWN F.T : _ ^ 4 . 1 7 : E S T . CONC. ( u q / L ) Q (B O 303091 -FORM I L C V - T I C 1 0 / 9 2 F:PA SAI''iPL.E NO. LOW CONC;. WAFER V G L A F I L E ORGANIGS A N A L Y S I S DATA -iJJ-lFTILr Lai:) Narne: PIG./.GUF:F iMH}::} L a b C o d e : GULF Ca-^;e N o . : IH L a b S a m p l e I D : XGUOO.lpL L.ab F i l e I D : yOXGy0.1.D F ' u r g e V o l u m e : 5^^1.5.-.Q0._ (iiYl. ) (.;oi"i trai:::t CAS NO- COMF'OI.IND ; SDG Flo - : 9 50 5 3 D a t e Reciei ve^l : 0 5 / 1 2 / 9 5 D a t e A i ' i a l y z e d : \''..'722/9^ D :i. 1 u t i. o I "1 I-' a c t < j r : 5 . 0 CONCENTRATION (u*:i/L.) Q 7 4 - 8 7 - 3 - 7 4 - 3 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 - 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 - 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 1 5 6 - 5 9 - 2 — 1 5 6 - 6 0 - 5 — 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 - 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 — 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 4 - 9 7 - 5 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 — 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 6 - 9 3 - 4 — 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 — 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 — 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 3 - 3 — 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 - - 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 - 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 — 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 - 5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 - - 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 - 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 9 6 - 1 2 - 3 - - • C h l o r o m e t h a n e •Bromome t h a i "I e • V :i r 1 y I G fLI. o r i d e C l ' i l o r o e t l ' i a n e •Me t h y l e n e C h 1 o r i d e A c e t o n e C a c" b o n D i s u I f i d e _ _ _ .1 , 1 - D i c h 1 o I" o e t b e n e 1 , 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e c i s - l , 2 ••• D i c h I o r o e t I'i e n e •trai"i=; —1 ., 2 - D i c h l o r o e t f i e n e _ Cl"iloi-ofor 111 '_ 1 , 2—Di c f i l o r o e t h a n e 2 — B u t a n o n e Eiromochl o r o m e t h a n e 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromod i chloromethane 1, 2-Di chloropropane c i s-1,3-D i c hIo ro p ropen e T r i c h 1 o roe t bene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Ben zene trans-l,3-Di chloropropene Bromoform 1 , 2 - D i t)rciirioe t h a n e 4- l"1ethyl - 2 -F'en t a n o n e 2-'Flexanone Te t r a c U 1 or o e tY\ei"ie 1 , 1, 2', 2-Tetrachloroethane T o l u e n e C Ll 1 o r L) L> e n z e ri e? _ _ FI t h y l ben zeno? S t y r e n e _ Xyl(-?ne ( ti.i'tal ) 1 , 3"'D:i cl'iToroben z e n e 1 , 4 -Di i.':l'ilor(Tben z e n e 1 , 2 —Di cli l.oroL>enzene_ 1 , 2 - D i br-Oiii»3 -3 - t i f i l o r o p r o p a n e r: ,1.1 5 5 1 0 2 5 5 5 5 5 •5 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 0 5 5 5 5 :-i ;u ;u ;u ;L.I A K ;u ; u ;u ;u ;LJ ;u ;u AK ;u :u ;u ;u ;u ;u ;u :u :u :u ;u ; '. u ;u ;u A?^ :u ;u :u ;u ;D :u ;u :u ;u :u \ \ h- . < - ^ - J ^ 5 > ^ ^ 1 > " > •5 * a: a r>q a\ o ro o ro ;u FORM I LCV 1 0 / 9 2 i...ai:) N a m e : ETC/;GlRJ--;_..;;>.OyiH L.ab C o d e : GLJLF C a s e N o . I...ab S a m p l e I D : XGU001.DL L a b F i l e I D : VOX.GUOID F'u r q e Vo I ume : 2 5 . 0 0 (iii 1 ) TL.GE EPA SAMPLi; L.OW GONG- WATER VOLATILE ORGANICS ANAL.YSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVI;:T...Y IDENTIFIED GOMPGLINDS ; ; MWOOOIDL. (^on •tr.:V'i:::t: I FILA _.. SA;;;. N O . : _ SDG No - : 950.53_ D a t e F.'ecei'-.'ed : 0.5/.ii:.^r../.!?Ji Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 D :i. 1 u t :L o n F a c: t •::> i - : 5 . O ^O , N u m b e r T i L ' s f o u n d : 1 CAS NUr-tBER COMPOUND NAME 1 . '.UNKNOWN RT 4 . 1 5 EST. CONC, ( u g / L ) 18 Q J 303093 U J ^ < ^ > - i ^ ^ •h CD (U FORM I LCV-TIC 1 0 / 9 2 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis Case Number; Site: Contractor Lab: Validator: QC Reviewer: Sample Matrix: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Island Chemical Company - RI Pace Incorporated, New Orleans, Louisiana Kirsten Meier ^^^^uACxjtf^ ^ A < A C ^ Validation Date: June 30, 1995 Review Date: 1 - H - 9 J ~ Water Analytical Method: EPA Superfund Low Concentration Semivolatile Method Sample Designations: MWOOOl MWOlOl MW0003 RBGWOO MW0004 MW0005 Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [x] Acceptable for use as qualified [ ] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The analytical data were reviewed in accordance with the EPA Functional Guidelines, February 1994. • 3 0 3 0 9 4 bna_clcc, 14 0.'il6199.'^ IJ.-W l--orm BNA l.l Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29X72 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Corajjany - RI DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative X Surrogate Recovery Summary NR MS/MSD Summary * Reagent Blank Summary X GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary Sample Data X Chain of Custody Forms * Holding Times * Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms * Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data * Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data * Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports X Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data X DFTPP Mass Spectra X Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X DFTPP Mass Listings 303095 bna dec. I 4 05I6!'W5 1330 2 Form BNA l.l Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29S72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data NR Organic Analysis Data Sheets NR Quantitation Reports NR Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample * Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts X TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Comments: None 303096 bna dec. [4 05161995 1330 • 3 Form BNA l.l Case Number: SDC 95053 Project Number: 29r72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemital Company - RI SPECIFIC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Were custody transfers correctly and completely documented? Yes[x] No Comments: None Holding Times Were sample extractions performed within holding times? Yes No[x] Were sample analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: The investigative samples were extracted on 5-15-95 and received surrogate spikes at one fourth the concentration required under the analytical method. The lab then re-extracted the investigative samples on 5-25-95, outside of hold time. Therefore, the results from the re-analyses were qualified as estimated (J). Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Were samples analyzed within the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? Yes[x] No Comments: None 3 0 3 0 9 7 bna_c!cc. 14 _ ' ' 05161995 1330 4 [-orm BNA l.l Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29»72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? Yes[x] No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes No[x] Did the initial calibration meet the minimum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: The relative standard deviation (%RSD) of two analytes exceeded the upper QC limit of 30.0%. However, no detection were reported for these analytes and qualification of data was not necessary. Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes No[x] Did the continuing calibration meet the minimum RRF criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: See table "Initial Calibration Summary" for outliers and applied qualifiers. The relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the listed analyte(s) exceeded the upper QC limit of 25.0%. Therefore, the results of these analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). 303098 bm_.:lec.l4 05161995 1330 5 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: island Chemical Company - RI Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveries within acceptance limits? Yes[x] No If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No NA[x] Comments: The surrogate recoveries from the original extracts as well as from the re-extracts are within QC requirements. Qualification of data is not necessary. Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample delivery group (SDG)? Yes No NA[x] Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes No NA[x] Comments: Under the Low Concentration method matrix spikes are not required. Qualification of data not necessary. Internal Standards Were the internal standard areas and retention times within the required limits? Yes[x] No If the internal standard requirements were not met, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes No NA[x] Comments: None 303099 bna_dcc.l4 05161995 1330 6 Fonn BNA l.l Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29«72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chimical Company - RI Blank Analyses Were the appropriate number of blank analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were analytes detected in the blanks? Yes[x] No If analytes were detected in the blanks, were the same analytes detected in the associated investigative samples? Yes[x] No NA Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes[x] No Comments: The action levels for the common lab contaminant Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate is 10 times the amount found in the associated blank. Detections of Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the investigative samples below the appropriate action level were qualified as undetected (U). As required by the Functional Guidelines, those results which were less than the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL) were raised to the CRQL. See table "Blank Summary Form" for detections and applied qualifiers. Laboratory Control Samples Were laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses performed at the correct frequency? Yes[x] No Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? Yes No[x] Comments: Two LCSs were performed, SLCSOl is associated with the first sample extract on 5-15-95, SLCS02 is associated with the second sample extract on 5-25-95. The recoveries for 4-Chloroaniline were below the QC limit in both LCSs. Therefore, the non-detected results for 4-Chloroaniline in all the investigative samples were qualified as unusable (R). 303100 hna_c Ice. I 4 05161995 l?X) Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29r72 10.3 Site ID: bland Chsmical Company - RI Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were mass spectra provided for the target analytes detected in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were the mass spectra of acceptable quality and analytes correctly identified? Yes No[x] Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (RRTs) acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: The lab reported Phenol as detectable between the IDL and the CRQL in the investigative samples MW0003 and MW0003RE. While reviewing the target compound spectrum comparisons, the data reviewer found that several ions at high intensities were present in the sample spectrum, but were not accounted for in the standard mass spectrum. Also the relative intensities of the ions between standard and sample mass spectra were not within the required 20%. Therefore, the results for Phenol were qualified as undetected (U) and the concentrations raised to the CRQL of 5 ug/1. Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identified compound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? Yes[x] No Were non-target peaks evaluated as required? Yes[x] No Were the TIC mass spectra, searches, identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: None 303101 bna dec. 14 05161995 1330 8 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: SDC 95053 Project Number: 29S72 10.3 Site ID; Island Chemical Company - RI Log Books Were sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Were sample analyses properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Comments: As stated before, the surrogate and spike concentrations in the original extracts were one fourth of the method required concentrations. TTie lab corrected that by re-extracting the investigative samples. Qualification of data was not necessary. 303102 bna_dcc.l4 05161995 1330 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID; Island Chemiial Company - RI Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning, 6-2-95, 9:15, 127 m/z Relative Abundance: 1078 X 100% = 51.139 2108 Initial Calibration, 5-25-95, SSTD080, Pyrene RRF: ( 92540 ) X ( 20 ) ( 13447 ) X ( 80 ) %RSD: 0.229 X 100% = 13.869 1.655 Continuing Calibration, 6-1-95, 8:46, Pyrene RRF: ( 24487 ) X ( 20 ) ( 19606 ) X ( 20 ) %D: 1.655 - 1.249 X 100% = 24.532 1.655 Surrogate Recovery, MW0004, Phenol-d5 % Recovery: 7.576 X 100% = 75.76 10 1.720 1.249 bna_clec.l4 05161995 1330 IQ 303103 Form BNA 1.1 Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Lab Control Spike Recovery, SLCSOl, Naphthalene % Recovery: 3.563 -0 X 100% = 71.260 5.0 Sample Results, MW0004 CRQL: Detected Result for Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ( 13409 ) X ( 20 ) 10.735 (21914) X ( 1.140) TIC Result, Unknown, RT = 11.05 min ( 87913 ) X ( 20 ) 19.249 91345 303104 bna_dcc.l 4 05161W5 1330 1 1 FomiBNA 1.1 (.'ase Number: SIX; 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM u> o ( j j l - » o Sample Identification MWOOOl MW0003 MW0004 MW0005 MWOlOl RBGWOO Date Sampled 5-9-95 5-10-95 5-10-95 5-10-95 5-9-95 5-10-95 Date Extracted 5-25-95 5-25-95 5-25-95 5-25-95 5-25-95 5-25-95 Extraction Holding Time 7 days 7 days 7 days 7 days 7 days 7 days Qualifier . 05161995 1330 12 ('aae Number: SIX; 95053 Project Number; 29872 10.3 .Site ID; Island Chemical Company - RI INITIAL CALIBRATION QUAUFICATION SUMMARY FORM CJ o u> H O Date/Time 5-25-95,0812 Instrument B Analyte N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine RF RSD 30.1 43.1 Qualified Samples None None Qualifier - - bjta_elcc.l4 05161995 1330 13 Porm BNA 1.1 o -J Case Number: SIX; 95053 Projeel Number: 29872 10.3 Site II): Island Chemical Company - RI- CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM CA) O Date/Time 5-26-95, 0819 6-1-95, 0846 Instrument B B Analyte Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 3-Nitroaniline 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine Hexachlorobenzene 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine 2,4,6-TribromophenoI (Surrogate) RF %D -30.9 -58.9 -36.7 -36.6 -27.9 -41.2 -34.0 -33.3 -64.8 42.5 -32.3 45.4 -66.7 Qualified Samples MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO MWOOOIRE, MW0003RE, MW0004RE, MWOIOIRE, RBGWOORE Qualifier J J biu_clcc.M 105161995 1310 14 Case Number: SIXI 9.5053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM o Date/Time 6-2-95, 1020 Instrument B Analyte 3-Nitroaniline 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 4-Nitroaniline 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine RF %D -42.9 -43.3 -76.1 -42.6 -37.0 Qualified Samples MW0005RE • Qualifier J o 00 btia_clec.l4 05161995 1330 15 (.•^»c Number: SIX; 9.^053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: lslai¥l Cl^miuil fompany - RI U) o 00 i-> o vo BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID SBLKWI SBLKW2 Analyte Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Blank Result (ug/1) 2 2 Action Level (ug/1) 20 20 Qualified Samples MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO MWOOOIRE, MW0003RE, MW0004RE, MW0005RE, MWOIOIRE, RBGWOORE biia_clec M 05161995 13.10 16 i'onn BNA l.l Case Number; SDG 95053 Project Number; 29872 10.3 Sile ID: bland Chemical Company - RI Summary and Conclusions The analytical results for the semivolatile analyses are acceptable for use as qualified. The investigative samples were re-extracted on 5-25-95, outside of hold time. Therefore, the results from the re-analyses, investigative samples MWOOOIRE, MW0003RE, MW0004RE, MW0005RE, MWOIOIRE, RBGWOORE were qualified as estimated (J). The relative standard deviation (%RSD) of several analyte(s) exceeded the upper QC limit of 25.0%. Therefore, the results of these analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). See the table "Continuing Calibration Summary" for detailed listing. Detections of Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were observed in the prep blanks, therefore, detections of this compound in the investigative samples below the action level were qualified as undetected (U). As required by the Functional Guidelines, those results which were less than the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL) were raised to the CRQL. The recoveries for 4-Chloroaniline in the LCSs were below the QC limit in both LCSs. Therefore, the non-detected results for 4-Chloroaniline in all the investigative samples were qualified as unusable (R). The lab reported Phenol as detectable between the IDL and the CRQL in the investigative samples MW0003 and MW0003RE. After reviewing the target compound spectrum comparisons, the reviewer does not agree with the lab's finding. Therefore, the results for Phenol were qualified as undetected (U) and the concentrations raised to the CRQL of 5 ug/1. Validator's Signature: J ~Ji,ovi K A L A Validator's Initials: K M Validation Date: G-^o-'^s QC Reviewer's Signature: ^ ' ^ ' ^ • ^ A A A ^ >=? y'A<y^<^,^ QC Reviewer's Initials: M ^ C Review Date: 7 ~ / / ~ 9J~ brw dec. 14 05161995 1330 1 7 l-orm BNA l.l 303110 1LCE^ LOW COWC. WATER SEhlVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lao Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XGUOOl Lab File ID: SVXGUOIL Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-<b0-l 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 -F'henol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ I -4-Methylphenol -N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine -Hexachloroethane -Ni troben zene -1so p ho rone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan iline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan iline -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i trotoluene -3-Ni troani1ine -Acenaphthene 5 5 : 5 : 5 ; 5 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 : 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 5 20 5 5 5 20 5 U U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u J ^ K u u u U J u u u • u u ;u .u :u3 :u VALIDATED Heviewed By m i^ K- i>^')0~ f S FORM I LCSV-1 3 0 3 1 1 1 10/9: ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGUOOl Lab File ID: SVXGUOIL Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) • CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/4_) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Ni trophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluor ene ._ 4-Ni troan iline 4,6-Din i tro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachiorophenol F'henan threne Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluorantbene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzid ine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Ben zo(b)F1uoran tbene Ben z o(k)F1uo ran t bene Ben zo(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 0 ; 20 : 5 ; 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 2 0 ; 20 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 2 0 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 • 5 5 5 5 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U 7 U 3 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u U U3 U 3 u u •JEf U u • U u :u • U ;u :u (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine (>-2>0AS teviev/^d By Date FORM I LCSV-2 303112 10/9: ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Lab Lab Code: GULF Sample ID: File ID: Case No.: XGUOOl SVXGUOIL HLA Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 Number TICs -found: CAS NUMBER 1. 3 . COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 6.00 9.85 11.09 EST. CONC. : (ug/L) 150 14 55 _ _ » _ .^ : 0 J J J Reviewed By Dale -. • FORM I LCSV-TIC 303113 1 0 / 9 2 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGUOOIRE Lab File ID: SVXGUOILR Sample volume: 400.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8. .cl CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 Phenol ; 111-44-4 bis (2-Chloroethyl)Ether ; 95-57-8 : 2-Chlorophenol I 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol ; 108-60-1 2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_; 106-44-5 4-Methyl phenol \ 621-64-7 N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine ; 6 7 - 7 2 - 1 — Hexachloroe thane ; 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene 78-59-1 Isophorone ; O O — " ? " ^ — " ^ O KJ.; + V-/->!-> K<->nr-.°l cjo /o o JC rnixropnenoJ. 105-67-9 2,4-Dimethyl phenol 111-91-1 bis(2-Chloroet boxy) Methane 120-83-2 2,4-Dichlorophenol ; 120-82-1 1,2,4-Tri chloroben zene 91-20-3 Naphthalene ' 106-47-8 4-Chloroan i 1 ine 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutad iene ' 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 88-06-2 2,4,6-Tr i chlorophenol 88-74-4 2-Ni troan i 1 ine 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate 606-20-2 2,6-Din i tro toluene 99-09-2 3-Ni troan i 1 ine 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 12 ; 12 ; " 12 : 12 ; 12 ; 12 ! 12 ; 12 ; 12 12 : 12 12 : 12 12 ; 12 12 ! 12 12 12 12 12 12 50 12 50 12 12 12 ; 50 12 u3 : u : u ; u u ; u : u ; u : u ; u ; U ! u : u : U ! uw ; u 3 : U 3 u u u u u u .u u ;u .u :u / : ;u 3 ; 1 Reviewed By /•CC-^'^i^z^ H J A C A Date ^-2>^-^S FORM I LCSV-1 303114 10/92 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGUOOIRE Lab File IDs SVXGUOILR Sample volumes 400.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volume: Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Nitrophenol Di ben zofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan iline 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate' Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Ben zo(b)Fluoran tbene Benzo(k)Fluorantbene Ben z o(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Di ben z(a,h)An thracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 50 50 ; 12 12 ; 12 ; 12 ; 12 50 : 50 ; 12 ; 12 12 ; 50 ' 12 ; 12 12 ; 12 12 ' 12 12 12 12 /2. ^ 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u U u U u. J r U J •J&^ u 7 U 3 u \ u ;u u ;uv u / J (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED Reviev/ed By . FORM I LCSV-2 1 0 / 9 i 303115 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XGUOOIRE Lab File IDs SVXGUOILR Sample volumes 400.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.s 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzeds 06/01/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.2 Number TICs found CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. ( u g / L ) Q 1 . UNKNOWN 1 0 . 7 5 98 J VALIWED Reviewed By l'^~^rOiy, r^£^Y Date ^ ^ O ' f < FORM I LCSV-TIC 303116 10/9: ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Caise No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHH009 Lab File IDs SVXHH09L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 7.8 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol "2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ -4-Methylphenol -N-Ni troso—Di-n-Propylamine -Hexachloroethane -Ni troben zene -Isophorone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan iline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Nitroaniline -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i tro toluene_; -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene ^rsr 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 1 5 5 ' 4 ^ 5 ' 5 5- ' 5 5 20 5 20 5 5 5 20 5 ^ U U U U U U U U u U U U U U u u J u u u U l u u u u u .u u ;u3 u VALIDATED Revisv/ed By Date _....... Ef h-^oAS FORM I LCSV-1 303117 10/92 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH009 Lab File ID: SVXHH09L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: ,SAS No.s SDG No. 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 7.8 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Ni trophenol Di ben zofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan i line . 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate E<en zo ( b) F1 uoran tbene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben z o(a)Pyrene I n d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) P y r e n e D i b e n z ( a , h ) A n t h r a c e n e B e n z o ( g , h , i ) P e r y l e n e 20 ! 20 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 ; 20 : 20 ! 5 : 5 5 ; 2 0 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ' 5 5 ; s ^ 5 ' 5 5 5 5 5 5 U l u : i u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u U l U l u u J&cT U u u u u u ;u ,u ( 1 ) - C a n n o t be s e p a r a t e d f r o m D i p h e n y l a m i n e Revip.vsd By VAUpATED, Date ^^l^O'f-^ FORM I LCSV-2 303118 10/92 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH009 Lab File ID: SVXHH09L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contracts SAS No.s (ul) EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOOO: SDG No.s 95053 Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Ex tracked s 05/15/95 Date Analyzed 5 05/26/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 7.8 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER 1. 119-61-9 4. . 3. 4. 1^ 5. 57-68-1 1 - COMPOUND NAME METHANONE, DIPHENYL- UNKNOWN UNKNOWN PHENOL, -(PHENYLMETHYL) BENZENESULFONAMIDE, 4-AMINO- UNKNOWN RT 14.55 14.89 15.15 15.29 22.82 13.05 EST. CONC. (ug/L) 59 27 49 13 23 510 ' Q Z 1 J J. J JN J Reviewed By Date VALIDATED >iUi ^ - : ^ 0 ' ^ ^ FORM I LCSV-TIC 303119 10/9: ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. # Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHH009RE Lab File IDs SVXHH09LR Sample volumes 450.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pH: 7.8 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether ; 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol ; 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol ', 108-60-1 2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_' 106-44-5 4-Methyl phenol \ 621-64-7 N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine ' 67-72-1 Hex a chlo roe thane ', 98-95-3 Ni t roben zene 78-59-1 Isophorone 1 88-75-5 2-Nitrophenol 105-67-9 2 , 4-Dimethyl phenol ! 111-91-1 bis (2-Chloroethoxy)Me thane 120-83-2 2,4-Di chlorophenol \ 120-82-1 1,2,4-Tri chloroben zene 91-20-3 Naphthalene 106-47-8 4-Chloroan i 1 ine 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 88-06-2 2,4, 6-Tri chlorophenol 95-95-4 2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol 91-58-7 2-Chloronaphthalene 88-74-4 2-Ni troan i 1 ine 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene 606-20-2 2,6-Din i tro toluene 99-09-2 3-Ni troan i 1 ine 83-32-9 Acenaphthene II J > ^ ' . 11 ; 11 ! 11 ; 11 ; 11 : 11 ; 11 : 11 ; 11 : 11 : 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 44 11 44 11 ; 11 11 ! 44 11 j(/ : u 1 ; u 1 : u ; u u : u ; u ; u : u : u u ; u : u ; u i \ u J ; J U 3 u u u u u u .u u ;u u ;u :u3 : 1 — _ t VALIDATE Reviewed By '^L^-^y^: Date 1^ i->^-f f FORM I LCSV-1 303120 10/92 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHH009RE Lab File ID: SVXHH09LR Sample volume: 450.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extrac-ted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 7.8 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 2,4-Din i trophenol 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol ! 132-64-9 Di ben zof uran _1 121-14-2 2,4-Din i tro toluene ; Q / l £ 1 ^ o r^4#-h4.Kv..-1..^K4.|-k-.l.%4-y-^ o'*—OO tL Uiexhylpnt.naiat.e 7005-72-3 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 1 86-73-7 Fluorene 100-01-6 4-Nitroaniline ; 534-52-1 4,6-Din itro-2-Methyl phenol 86-30-6 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ( 1) ; 101-55-3 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene ', 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 85-01-8 Phenan threne 1 120-12-7 Anthracene 84-74-2 Di-n-Bu tyl phthalate 206-44-0 Fluoran thene 129-00-0 Pyrene 85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1 3,3 ' -Di chloroben z id ine 56-55-3 Ben zo (a) An t hracene 218-01-9 Chrysene 117-81-7 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0 Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205-99-2 Ben zo ( b) Fluoran thene 207-08-9 Ben zo(k) Fluoran thene 50-32-8 Ben zo ( a) Pyrene 193-39-5 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd )Pyrene 53-70-3 Di ben z (a, h) An t hracene 191-24-2 Ben zo (g , h, i ) Perylene 44 44 ; 11 11 ; 11 11 : 11 44 ; 44 11 11 11 ; 44 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 42 11 11 11 : 11 11 ; 11 11 u : u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u T ! / 1 u J : u 3 : .u u :u u ;u^ ; u : 1 / ! r ; (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED. Reviewed By \<A^A^L-\ . H A { ^ Date FORM I LCSV-2 303121 Az-iQ-rs 1~1 0/92 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH009RE Lab File ID: SVXHH09LR Sample volume: 450.0 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.s 95053 Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/O1/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 7.8 Number TICs foundi CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 119-61-9 3. 57-68-1 COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN METHANONE, DIPHENYL BENZENESULFONAMIDE, 4-AMINO- RT 12.65 14.15 21.77 EST. CONC. (ug/L) 520 51 27 0 J JN JN Reviewed By Date VALIDATED FORM I LCSV-TIC 303122 10/92 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH003 Lab File ID: SVXHH03L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: MW0004 SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8— 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether [ -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane). -4-Methylphenol -N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine 1 -Hexachloroethane -Ni troben zene -Isophorone . -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane I -2,4-Di chlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan i1ine -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene -2,4,6-Tri chlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan iline -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i trotoluene_ -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ; 5 5 ! 5 5 ' 5 5 ; 5 5 ' 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 !0 5 U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u y-K u u u U l u u u .u u ;u :u ;u J :u VALI Reviewed By Date L DATED , fn-^O-^S FORM I LCSV-1 303123 10/9: ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH003 Lab File IDs SVXHH03L Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) a 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Ni trophenol Di ben zofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene ^ 4-Ni troan iline 4,6-Dini tro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An thracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Ben zo(b)Fluoran thene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben zo(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene •-r—Dibenz (a, h) Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 0 20 : 5 5 : 5 5 ; 5 ' 20 : 2 0 , 5 ; 5 5 ; 2 0 ' 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 ' 5 5 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U7 U 3 U U U U U U u u u u u u u u u u U l u l u u ^ L A U U u ;u u ;u • u (1) — Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED Reviewed By /'CC^XJ VW-, /Kj/iC FORM I LCSV-: Date _fi:Jo -is 303124 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHH003 Lab File IDs SVXHH03L Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.s (ul) MW0004 SDG No.s 95053 Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/15/95 Date Analyzeds 05/26/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.3 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC, (ug/L) Q UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 11.09 12.97 19 18 IAJUHK^L VALIDATED Reviewed By Date fn-'^O-'^S FORM I LCSV-TIC 303125 10/9: ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 Lab Sample IDs XHH003RE Lab File IDs SVXHH03LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 ^- 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ I -4-Methylphenol -N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propyl am irie -Hexachloroethane -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane -2,4-Di chlorophenol -1,2,4—Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan iline -Hexachlorobutad iene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan i1ine -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i trotoluene -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene 5 5 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 : 5 5 ! 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ' 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 !0 5 U l U u U u U U U U u u u u u ui f U J IhK U l u u u u u u u u ;u u :u :u I 2 Reviewed Daie VALIDATED y ( o - ' ^ O - ' ^ ^ FORM I LCSV-1 303126 10/92 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH003RE Lab File ID: SVXHH03LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO, COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1,0 pH: 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 ' 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Ni trophenol Di ben zofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan iline 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachloroben zene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene —-Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Di chloroben z id ine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate" Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Ben z o(b)FIuoran thene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben zo(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g ,h, i )F"erylene 20 20 ; 5 5 : 5 5 ; 5 ' 20 ; 20 5 ; 5 5 ; 20 5 ; 5 5 : 5 5 5 5 5 5 14 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U J U U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u Uv A u l ; ^ C / J U l ;u u :u :u :u\ : u : 1/ J (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED Reviewed By Date \LJIDATED FORM I LCSV-2 303127 10/92 # ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH003RE Lab File ID: SVXHH03LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.s (ul) SDG No.s 95053 Date Rieceived: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. (ug/L) Q UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 1 0 . 7 0 1 2 . 5 9 38 18 Reviewed By Date —.-—.. VALipATED /-lc.-:))e-r»- C'-:i(:?'f^ FORM I LCSV-TIC 303128 1 0 / 9 2 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Lab File IDs SVXHH02L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.s 95053 (ul) • CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.1 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2- 111-44-4- 95-57-8— 95-48-7— 108-60-1- 106-44-5- 621-64-7- 67-72-1— 98-95-3— 78-59-1— 88-75-5— 105-67-9- 111-91-1- 120-83-2- 120-82-1- 91-20-3— 106-47-8- 87-68-3— 59-50-7— 91-57-6— 77-47-4— 88-06-2— 95-95-4— 91-58-7— 88-74-4— 131-11-3- 208-96-8- 606-20-2- 99-09-2— 83-32-9— -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_I -4-Methylphenol -N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine \ -Hexachloroethane -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane I -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroaniline -Hexachlorobutad iene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan iline -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Dinitrotoluene_^ -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 ; 5 5 ' 5 5 5 5 2 0 5 20 5 5 5 20 5 U U u U u U U U u U U U U U u u ^y-R u u u . U l u u u ;u u !U u : u i :u Reviewed B Datt _ VALIDATED 5y \<An-l'^ fx, faAQ-iS FORM I LCSV-1 1 0 / 9 : 303129 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Lab File ID: SVXHH02L Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes Contract: SAS No.s SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO, 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.1 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 2 0 7 - 0 8 - 9 — — 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Ni trophenol Di ben zof uran , 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan i 1 ine . 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene . Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben z o(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 0 ; 0 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 0 ; 0 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 •; .0 5 ; 5 5 ! 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U 3 U 3 U U U U U U U U U U u u U U U U UJ UJ U u j r c y u ;u u ;u ;u ;u ;u (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine Reviewed By VALIDATED Date A30-fS FORM I LCSV-: 10/9: 303130 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Lab File IDs SVXHH02L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contracts SAS No.s (ul) EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOOO5 SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pHs 8.1 Number TICs founds CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 119-61-9 COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN METHANONE, DIPHENYL RT 11.05 12.97 14.52 EST. CONC. (ug/L) 14 41 7 Q J J JN VALIDATED !wed By [Zz-r^ Reviewed By ///-jnf'.^x^ P f 1 ^ FORM I LCSV-TIC 303131 10/9: ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHH002RE Lab File IDs SVXHH02LR Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/02/95 Dilution Factor: 1,0 pH: 8.1 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 ~bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether ; 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol ! 108-60-1 2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ 106-44-5 4-Methyl phenol ', 621-64-7 N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine 67-72-1 Hexachloroe thane \ 98-95-3- Nitrobenzene 78-59-1 Isophorone ! 88-75-5 2-Ni trophenol 105-67-9 2,4-Dimethyl phenol ', 111-91-1 bis( 2-Chloroethoxy) Methane 120-83-2 2,4-Dichlorophenol ! 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 91-20-3 Naphthalene ; 106-47-8 -4-Chloroan i 1 ine 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene ' 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-Me thyl phenol 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene ~ ' 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 88-06-2 2,4,6-Tr i chlorophenol 95-95-4 2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol 91-58-7 2-Chloronaphthalene 88-74-4 2-Ni troan i 1 ine 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate 606-20-2 2,6-Din i tro toluene 99-09-2 3-Ni troan i 1 ine 83-32-9 Acenaphthene - 5 5 : 5 ; 5 : 5 5 5 5 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ' 5 5 20 5 20 5 5 5 20 5 1 1 U3 1 u : U ! u ; u > ; u ; u u ; u : u ; u ; u u : u ; U^' u 3 : U l : u u u u u u .u u ;u lU !U / ; .u 1 : 1 1 1 VA Reviewed By Date I / A . J - ? < ^ U TED ^ - ' ^ ^ - 9 A FORM I LCSV-1 1 0 / 9 2 303132 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHH002RE Lab File IDs SVXHH02LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract! SAS No.i SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/25/95 Date Analyzeds 06/02/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.1 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 — 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol ; Dibenzofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troaniline ; 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachloroben zene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An thracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate" Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo( b) Fluoran thene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben zo(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 0 2 0 ; 5 5 : 5 5 ; 5 20 ; 20 5 ; 5 5 ; 20 5 ; 5 5 • 5 5 ' 5 5 5 5 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 u: U U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u .U'l / U 1 \ ^ u : } U l .ul u ;u ;u ! U y : u : / I (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIjDATEp, Reviewed By / O-J^jC^L iCt^l < FORM I LCSV- 1 0 / 9 : 303133 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHH002RE Lab File IDs SVXHH02LR Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/02/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.1 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. (ug/L) Q 1. UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 10.65 12.52 ?9 1^ VALIDATED Reviewed Dv M / - ^ - f k l ^ j A ^ < Date C,'3>o-9s FORM I LCSV-TIC 303134 10/92 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH HLA Lab Code: GULF Case No. Lab Sample ID: XGU002 Lab File ID: SVXGU02L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: SAS No-: SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pHs 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 T — 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ -4-Methylphenol -N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine -Hex a chloroethane -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 1 -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan iline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene_ -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan i1ine -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i trotoluene_. -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 ! 5 ! 5 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ! 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 0 5 2 0 5 5 5 2 0 5 U U U U U U U U u U U U U U u U J^K U u U . U J u :u u ;u u ;u • u ;u3 !U Reviewed Date . — VALIDATED By /Aj^fe /^<-!< h-10'^S L. FORM I LCSV-1 303135 1 0 / 9 : ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample IDs XGU002 Lab File IDs SVXGU02L Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/15/95 Date Analyzed 5 05/26/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Ni trophenol Di ben zofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ -Fluorene 4-Ni troan i 1 irie 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachloroben zene F'entachlorophenol Phenanthrene An thracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate" Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene E<en zo (a) F'yrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd) F'yr en e Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Ben zo(g,h,i)Perylene 20 20 : 5 5 5 5 ; 5 20 ; 20 5 ' 5 5 • 20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 S ^ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U3 U3 U U u U U U u U u U u U u U u u U l U J u u JB<? O u u u . ;u u '.u .u (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED Reviewed By Date [A^^tA. Cn^^^~9S FORM I LCSV-2 303136 10/92 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGU002 Lab File ID: SVXGU02L Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOlOl SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN „ „ RT 5.93 9.82 11.07 EST. CONC. ; (ug/L) 120 15 51 Q J J J i^-T.y^'9':' Reviewed By / ' ^ ^ '^ ^ ^ ^ ' ^-^^ ^ Date FORM I LCSV-TIC 303137 10/9: ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGU002RE Lab File ID: SVXGU02LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) a ; 108-95-2 Phenol ; 111-44-4 —bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether \ I 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol ; 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol ; 108-60-1 2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ : 106-44-5 4-Methyl phenol ' ; 621-64-7 N-Ni troso-Di-n-Propylamine ', 67-72-1 Hexachloroethane ' ; 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene ! 78-59-1 Isophorone ! ; 88-75-5 2-Nitrophenol ; 105-67-9 2,4-Dimethyl phenol ; 111-91-1 bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ; 120-83-2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ; 91-20-3 Naphthalene ; 106-47-8 4-Chloroan i 1 ine ; 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene ' ; 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol : 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene ! 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ; 88-06-2 2,4,6-Tr i chlorophenol I 95-95-4 2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol ; 91-58-7 2-Chloronaphthalene ; 88-74-4 2-Ni troani line ! 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate ; 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene ; 606-20-2 2, 6-Din i tro toluene ; 99-09-2 3-Nitroaniline ! 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 5 5 i 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 5 20 5 : 5 5 ; 20 5 u:i ! u ; u ; U ! u ; u ^ ; u ; u ; u U ! u u ; u ; u : uv ; U 3 Ul ; U u u u u u u u !U u :ul ' 1 u-J ; 1 1 Reviewed By Date VAUPATED FORM I LCSV-1 303138 10/92 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGU002RE Lab File IDs SVXGU02LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOIOIRE SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.3 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) a 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol 132-64-9 Di ben zof uran 121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2 Diethyl phthalate 7005-72-3 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether ; 86-73-7 F1 uo ren e 100-01-6-^ 4-Nitroaniline ', 534-52-1 4 , 6-Din i t ro-2-Me t hyl phenol 86-30-6 N-Ni trosod i phenylamine (1) ! 101-55-3 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene ', 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 85-01-8 Phenan threne ; 120-12-7 Anthracene 84-74-2 Di-n-Bu tyl phthalate 206-44-0 Fluoran thene 129-00-0 Pyrene 85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1 3,3 ' -Di chloroben z id ine 56-55-3 Ben zo (a) An thracene 218-01-9 Chrysene 117-81-7 bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0 Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205-99-2 Ben zo ( b) Fluoran thene 207-08-9 Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene 50-32-8 Ben z o ( a ) Pyrene 193-39-5 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene v>o /o—o Ul ben z c a, n J Rn xhracene 191-24-2 Ben zo ( g , h, i ) Perylene 20 20 • 5 5 5 5 ; 5 20 ; 20 5 5 5 20 5 ' 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 UT ; u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u / 1 U J : JETC/T ; U l : 'U u ,u u . 11 \_ / 1 u J 1 .^_ 1 (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATE Reviewed By Date ^4_: }<p - 9 S FORM I LCSV-2 3 0313 9 10/92 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XGU002RE Lab File ID: SVXGU02LR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.s (ul) MWOIOIRE SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extrac-ted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pHs 8.3 Number TICs founds # CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 930-68-7 3. 4. 5. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN 2-CYCLOHEXEN-1-ONE UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.80 7.33 10.74 11.04 11.15 EST. CONC. (ug/L) 26 12 91 17 50 Q J JN J J J Reviewed By FORM I LCSV-TIC Date lo'A?'?': 10/92 303140 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample ID: XHHOOl Lab File IDs SVXHHOIL Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volumes Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factors 1.0 pH: 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 106-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-6 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 606-20-2 99-09-2 83-32-9 Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylphenol 2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane). 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine Hexachloroethane . Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane ~2,4-Dichlorophenol —1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene —.—2,4,6-Tri chlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene ; 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl Phthalate Acenaphthylene — 2 , 6-Din i trotoluene_^ . — 3 - N i troan iline —Acenaphthene Date (^-lo~'9S FORM I LCSV-1 10/9: 303141 ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. h Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHHOOl Lab File ID: SVXHHOIL Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 (ul) Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pHs 8.2 CONCENTF<:ATION CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Ni trophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Din i trotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan i line _, 4,6-Din i tro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachloroben zene Pen tachlorop hen o1 Phenan threne Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate] Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben zo(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 20 20 ; 5 5 : 5 ; 5 20 ; 20 5 5 5 2 0 5 ; 5 5 • 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 JZ- 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 u^ U 3 u U J U U U U U u U U U u U U U U7 uo u u fi^i/ u ;u u :u u :u ;u (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine Reviewed By VALIDATED Date L M U L FORM I LCSV-2 303142 LO/92 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Names ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Codes GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHHOOl Lab File IDs SVXHHOIL Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes 1.0 (ul) Contract; SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.s 95053 Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/26/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 Number TICs found: CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. ( u g / L ) Q Reviewed By Date . VALIDATED A^A-f^ FORM I LCSV-TIC 303143 10/92 ILCB LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Contract: SAS No.; SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHHOOIRE Lab File ID: SVXHHOILR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) (ul) CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 108-95-2- 111-44-4- 95-57-8— 95-48-7— 108-60-1- 106-44-5- 621-64-7- 67-72-1 — 98-95-3— 78-59-1 — 88-75-5— 105-67-9- 111-91-1- 120-83-2- 120-82-1- 91-20-3— 106-47-8- 87-68-3— 59-50-7— 91-57-6— 77-47-4— 88-06-2— 95-95-4— 91-58-7— 88-74-4— 131-11-3- 208-96-8- 606-20-2- 99-09-2— 83-32-9— -Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether -2-Chlorophenol -2-Methylphenol -2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane)_I -4-Methylphenol -N-Nitroso-Di-n-F'ropylamine -Hexachloroethane . -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone -2-Ni trophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -Naphthalene -4-Chloroan iline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4~Chloro-3-Methylphenol -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol -2~Chloronaphthalene -2-Ni troan iline -Dimethyl Phthalate -Acenaphthylene -2,6-Din i trotoluene -3-Ni troan iline -Acenaphthene 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 5 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 ! 5 ; 5 5 5 5 • 5 5 20 5 2 0 5 5 5 20 5 U l U U U U U U U U U U U U U U\/ U J ^r^ U l u u u u u u u u '.u u :uv .u I 1 Reviewed By Date VALIDATED . f?-A0-9S FORM I LCSV-1 303144 1 0 / 9 : ILCC LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.s HLA Lab Sample IDs XHHOOIRE Lab File IDs SVXHHOILR Sample volumes 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volumes 1000 Injection Volumes Contracts SAS No.s SDG No.s 95053 (ul) CAS NO. 1.0 (ul) COMPOUND Date Receiveds 05/12/95 Date Extracteds 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 CONCENTRATION (ug/L) Q 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 2,4-Din i trophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ Fluorene 4-Ni troan i line 4,6-Din i tro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol F'henan threne Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Ben zo(a)An thracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate] Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Ben zo(k)Fluoran thene Ben z o(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Di ben z(a,h)An thracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 0 20 5 5 1 5 5 20 ; 20 5 : 5 5 ! 2 0 5 ! 5 5 ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 16 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U" J U U ^ U l J U l U U u u u u u u u u u u u u UV / U l ^ U 2 U l u u u u .u^ u. 3 (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine VALIDATED Reviewed By Date •• FORM I LCSV-2 . ^ 1 0 / 9 2 ,ipATEp / 303145 ILCF LOW CONC. WATER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ETC/GULF SOUTH Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Lab Sample ID: XHHOOIRE Lab File ID: SVXHHOILR Sample volume: 1000 (ml) Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: 1.0 (ul) Contract: SAS No.: (ul) SDG No.: 95053 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/25/95 Date Analyzed: 06/01/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 pH: 8.2 Number TICs foundi CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. ( u g / L ) Q Reviewed Date — VALIDATED By \:A^Ay: I Q A r^-^oAA 303146 FORM I LCSV-TIC 10/92 HLA DATA QUAUTY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Low Concentration Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls Analysis Case Number: SDG 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site: Island Chemical Company - RI Contractor Lab: Pace Incorporated, New Orleans, Louisiana Validator: Kirsten Meier QC Reviewer: ^^^^^^^y^uc^^ ^ ^ ^ A U J ^ ^ Validation Date: Review Date: July 6, 1995 - A / / y / 7 j - Sample Matrix: Water Analytical Method: EPA Superfund Low Concentration Method Sample Designations: MWOOOl MWOlOl MW0003 RBGWOO MW0004 MW0005 Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [x] Acceptable for use as qualified [ ] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The analytical data were reviewed in accordance with the EPA Functional Guidelines, February 1994. i>cp_clcc. 1 1 i : : 9 i ' « 4 i53<) Fcrm OCP I. I 3 03147 Ca3c Number: ProjectNumber: Site ID: DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary * Case Narrative * Surrogate Recovery Summary X LCS Summary X Reagent Blank Summary Sample Data X Chain of Custody Forms * Holding Times X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms X Pesticide/PCB Identification (for positive detections) Instrument Calibration and Performance Data X Initial Calibration Retention Time Summary X Initial Calibration Response Factor Summary X Performance Evaluation Mix Summary X Continuing Calibration Verification Summary X Analytical Run Sequence Summary X GPC Calibration and Florisil Cartridge Check Summary X Pesticide/PCB Standards Quantitafion Reports X Pesticide/PCB Standards GC/EC Chromatograms Reagent and Instrument Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms X Pesticide/PCB Identification (for positive detections) ocp_clcc. 11 12291994 1530 303148 Case Number; ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Lab Control Spike Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports X GC/EC Chromatograms Comments: None *>cp_clcc.l 1 12291994 1530 3 Form OCP 1.1 303149 Case Number: ProjectNumber: Site ID: SPECinC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Comments: None Holding Times Were sample extractions performed within holding times? Yes No[x] Were sample analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: The investigative samples RBGWOO, MW0005, and MW0003 were reextracted on 5-23-95, outside hold time. Therefore, the results for the investigative samples RBGWOORE, MW0005RE, and MW0003RE were qualified as estimated (J). ocp^clcc!! 12291994 1530 4 FormOCP Ll 303150 Case Number: ProjectNumber: Site ID: Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the guidelines regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? Yes[x] No Were the calibration standards analyzed at the correct concentrations? Yes[x] No Did the calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes[x] No Were retention time windows provided and correctly calculated? Yes[x] No Were peak resolutions acceptable? Yes[x] • No Comments: None Individual Mix Standards (Continuing Calibration) Did the individual mix standards meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes[x] No Did the individual mix standards meet the retention time criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: None ocp clcc.l 1 12291994 1530 5 Form OCP 1.1 303151 Case Number: ProjectNumber: .Site ID: Performance Evaluation Mix Standards (Continuing Calibration) Did the performance evaluation mix standards meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes[x] No Did the performance evaluation mix standards meet the retention time criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: None Analytical Sequence Were standard and sample analyses performed following the correct analytical sequence? Yes[x] No Comments: On page 115 the matrix spike from a different run was entered into the analytical sequence. Matrix spikes are not required under the Low Concentration method, qualification of data was not necessary. Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveries within acceptance limits? Yes No[x] If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? . Yes No[x] Comments: The following analytical samples had surrogate recoveries outside the QC requirement of 60-150%. If either of the surrogate recoveries is below 60%, the results for the compounds in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). Sample ID MWOOOl MW0003 MW0003RE MW0004 MW0005 MW0005RE MWOlOl TCX 1, %Rec 178 DCB 1, %Rec 50 32 32 47 48 56 33 TCX 2, %Rec 178 348 DCB 2, %Rec 49 57 45 50 57 37 Qualifier t^cpetcc.l I 12291994 1530 303152 Case Number: ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in this sample delivery group (SDG)? Yes No NA[x] Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes No Comments: Matrix spike analyses are not required under the Low Concentration method. Data was not qualified. Blank Analyses Were the appropriate number of blank analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were instrument blanks analyzed at the correct frequency? Yes[x] No Were analytes reported in the blanks? Yes[x] No If analytes were reported in the blanks, were the same analytes also reported in the associated investigative samples? Yes No[x] Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes No[x] Comments: None 303153 ocp_c]cc.l 1 12:91994 1530 . 7 Forni OCP t.i Ca.sc Number: ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Instrument Performance Were the percent breakdowns for 4,4'-DDT and endrin correctly reported? Yes[x] No Were the percent breakdowns for 4,4'-DDT and endrin within acceptance limits? Yes[x] No Comments: None GPC and Florisil Cartridge Check Was GPC cleanup performed on the sample extracts? Yes No[x] Was the GPC column check acceptable? Yes No NA[x] Was a Florisil cartridge check performed? Yes[x] No Was the Florisil cartridge check acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: None 303154 *>cp_cIce. I 1 12291994 1530 Case Number: ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Laboratory Control Samples Were LCS analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? Yes[x] No Comments: None Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were chromatograms provided for all target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were chromatograms of acceptable quality and were analytes correctly identified? Yes[x] No Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate standard and were the retention times (RTs) acceptable? Yesx[] No Comments: The lab provided detailed information for the sample identifications. Due to the strong matrix interferences, which mostly resulted in poor peak resolutions in the investigative samples, it is not possible to reevaluate peak identifications without the use of a computer and the actual data files. The lab sufficiently showed that the instruments used were in good operating conditions, so that the reviewer accepts the lab's decisions on the peak identifications. No data was qualified. The lab used the qualifier "P" when the percent difference between both analytical column detections exceeded 25%. The reviewer added the qualifier "J" to indicate that it is an estimated value. 303155 ocp c !oc. 1 1 12291994 1530 9 Form OCP l.l Case Number: ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Calculation Check Initial Calibration, 5-18-95, DB-1701, Methoxychlor Retention Time Window: Average RT= 19.31, window is =/- 0.07 min Window: 19.24 - 19.38 min %RSD: 168226.04 / 1230000 x 100 = 13.68 % Continuing Calibration, 5-19-95, 0831, DB-608, Methoxychlor %D: ( 0.204 - 0.20 ) / 0.204 x 100 = 1.96 % Surrogate Recovery, MW0004, TCXl 0.0299 / 0.04 X 100 = 74.75 % Matrix Spike Recovery, MWOOOIMS, gamma-BHC 0.177 / 0.150 X 100 = 118.0% RPD: ( 2 I 118 - 105 I ) / (118 -I- 105 ) X 100 = 11.66 % 303156 »cp_clcc.I I 12291994 1530 1 0 Form OCP 1.1 Case Number: ProjectNumber: Sile ID: Sample Results, MWOlOl CRQL: Positive Result: Heptachlor 101289 X 2000 / 8290000 / 1000 = 0.024 303157 <.>jp dec. 11 1229!994 1530 11 Form OCP I.! ('a.sc Number: Prt>jc^tNumber: .Site ID: w o u> Ul 00 HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Identification RBGWOORE MW0005RE MW0003RE Date Sampled 5-10-95 5-10-95 5-10-95 Date Prepared 5-23-95 5-23-95 5-23-95 Date Analyzed Prep. Holding Time 7 days 7 days 7 days Analysis Holding Time Qualifier J J J Comments: None 12291994 1530 12 l-onn OCP l.l (,'a»c Number: ProjectNumber: Site ID: INITIAL CALIBRATION QUALinCATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument Analyte RF RSD Qualified Samples Qualifier Comments: CO o 03 M (JI I 12:91994 LVO I-ormOC-p l.l iSAsc Number: Pmjccl Number: Silc ID: CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument - Analyte %D Qualified Samples Qualifier Comments: w o u> o iH.-p d e c . 1 1 i;291994 l.W) Form OCP l.l (,'asc Number: Pn.>]cclNumhcr; Siic ID: BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID PBLKW2 Analyte Dieldrin Blank Result 0.028 Units ug/1 5 x Result 0.14 Qualified Samples None Qualifier — LO O LO Comments: iK7>_elci,-.l 1 12291994 l.SrXl 15 I'onn OCP 1.1 Ca-ie Number: ProjectNumber: ,Sile ID: Summary and Conclusions The analytical results for the low concentration pesticide/PCB analyses are acceptable for use as qualified. The investigative samples RBGWOO, MW0005, and MW0003 were reextracted outside hold time. Therefore, the results for the investigative samples RBGWOORE, MW0005RE, and MW0003RE were qualified as estimated (J). The surrogate recoveries exceeded the QC criteria in the investigative samples MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0003RE, MW0004, MW0005, MW0005RE, and MWOlOl; therefore, the results in these samples were qualified as estimated (J). TTie lab used the qualifier "P" when the percent difference between both analytical column detections exceeded 25%. The reviewer added the qualifier "J" to indicate that it is an estimated value. Validator's Signature: •(jjniioxA^ [ix^eu Validator's Initials: ]/{ H Validation Date: I ' C - ' i S QC Reviewer's Signature: ^ ^ ^ A ^ C u ^ ~^, ^fA^-^^^yt-x, QC Reviewer's Initials: M F p Review Date: 1 - 1 1 - 9 J - cx,-p clcc.l 1 12291994 1530 1 6 Torm OCP 1.1 303162 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET i^b Name: G S E L I HLA Lab Code: GULF Case No ^^___ Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOOOl SDG No.: 95053 Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N 2000 (uL) pH: 8.2 Lab Sample ID: XGUOOl Lab File ID: Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N _ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4,4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4 • -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4,4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.039 0.010 0.057 0.010 0.025 0.010 0.014 0.010 0.020 0.043 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.017 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 PJ U p U p u p u u P u u u u u u U u P U U u u u u u^ / UJ FORM I PEST •'^VIDATE o LO H a\ LO ' ^ ' i i Y l mil 3 / ^ Q ^ ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G S E L I Lab Code: GULF Case No. HLA Contract: HLA SAS No.: MW0003 SDG No.: 95053 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Lab Sample ID: XHH009 Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Voliome: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7.8 2000 (uL) Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/17/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N _ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4.4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4 ' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.017 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.013 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U P U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u p u u u u u u 3 J U3 1 VAl,»DATEn A', fu.i- FORM I PEST / / o to JLOJL ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ijab Name: G S E L I Contract: HLA EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0003RE Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT SAS No. SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHH009RE Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7.8 2000 (uL) Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/23/95 Date Analyzed: 05/24/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindcuie) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4 , 4 • -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4 • -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4, 4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5- Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.083 0.010 0.010 0.014 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.011 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 u u p u u u u u u u u u u u u u u p u u u u u u u 1 1 ^ua 1 (jO o to j - * tn FORM I PEST Heviewed By Dal* VALIDATED, k^;. 3/90 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: G S E L I Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: lOQO (g/mL) ML_ % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Contract: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0004 SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHH003 Lab File ID: CONT Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 8.3 2000 (uL) Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4.4'-DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 u: U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u Uj uJ r U3 1 to o 00 »-» a\ FORM I PEST g^iewed By VALIDATED 7-1^^ f,^—u^ ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G S E L I Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract: HLA SAS No.: MW0005 SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 8.1 2000 (uL) Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4 , 4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4 , 4 ' -DDD 1031-07-8 —Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4, 4 • -DDT 72-43 -5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U j U u U U u u u u u u D u u u u u u u u 0 u u U u u UV r / U3 to o to t-» FORM I PEST VALIDATEp Date 1±~^ WaiL ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G S E L I Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract: HLA SAS No.: MW0005RE SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHH002RE Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N 2000 (uL) pH: 8.1 Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/23/95 Date Analyzed: 05/24/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N _ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 gaunma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4.4 • -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4 • -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4, 4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 UJ ' U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u\ / U:J to o to M a\ c» FORM I PEST Jfeviewed By Date .. VALIDATED, A 3/90 ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: G S E L I HLA Lab Code: GULF Case No Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MWOlOl SDG No.: 95053 Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 8.3 2000 (uL) Lab Sample ID: XGU002 Lab File ID: Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N _ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8— delta-BHC 58-89-9 qcunma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4.4'-DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4, 4'-DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 —Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 1 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.032 0.010 0.017 0.010 0.022 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.025 0.044 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.015 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 P3 1 U p u u u u u p p u u u u u u u u p u u u u u u Uv / U.1 1 FORM I PEST Reviewed By Date CO o to H a\ Lab Name: G S E L I ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: HLA EPA SAMPLE NO. RBGWOO Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT SAS No. SDG No.: 95053 Concentrated Extract Volume: . Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 2000 (uL) 8.2 Lab Sample ID: XHHOOl Lab File ID: Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/15/95 Date Analyzed: 05/22/95 Dilution Factor: 1.00 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4 . 4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4 , 4 ' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4 , 4 • -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 qamma-Chlordane 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12 672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-1260 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0,20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 U U U U U U U U U U U U u . u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u to o CO H O FORM I PEST ReviP'.v: Date _ VALIDATED 3 / 9 0 , J ^ ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: G S E L I Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) _ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Contract: HLA SAS No.: RBGWOORE SDG No.: 95053 Lab Sample ID: XHHOOIRE Lab File ID: Concentrated Extract Volume: Injection Volume: 1.00 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 8.2 2000 (uL) Date Received: 05/12/95 Date Extracted: 05/23/95 Date Analyzed: 05/24/95 Dilution Factor: 1,00 CAS NO. COMPOUND Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 beta-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 58-89-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) 76-44-8 Heptachlor 309-00-2 Aldrin 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 959-98-8 Endosulfan I 60-57-1 Dieldrin 72-55-9 4 . 4 ' -DDE 72-20-8 Endrin 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 72-54-8 4 . 4 ' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 50-29-3 4 . 4 ' -DDT 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 5103-74-2 qamma-Chlordane 8001-3 5-2 Toxaphene 12674-11-2 Aroclor-1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Aroclor-1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Aroclor-1248 11097-69-1 Aroclor-1254 11096-82-5 Aroclor-12 60 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0,020 0.020 0.020 0.10 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 1.0 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0,20 U , U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u u u u u u u T u u 4r u r to o CO FORM I PEST Revi."- Date >-6 V5 " - HLA DATA QUAUTY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Metals Analysis Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site: Island Chemical Company - RI Contractor Lab: Pace Incorporated, New Orleans, Louisiana Validator: Kirsten Meier QC Reviewer: ^ A A ^ A A M / ^ ^ A ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Validation Date: Review Date: July 7, 1995 7 / / ? / ' ? r - Sample Matrix: Water Analytical Method: EPA CLP ILM02.0 for Metals, including Cyanide Sample Designations: Client ID (Lab ID) MWOOOl (XGUOOl) MWOlOl (XGU002) DW0004* (XHH007) MW0003 (XHH009) RBGWOO (XHHOOl) DW0005* (XHH006) MW0004 (XHH003) DWOOOl* (XGU005) DWG 101* (XGU006) MW0005 (XHH002) DW0003*(XHH010) DBGWOO* (XHH005) (*) Dissolved metals only Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [x] Acceptable for use as qualified [ ] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The investigative samples were analyzed following the EPA CLP Method ILM02.0 and the data were reviewed in accordance with the Functional Guidelines, February 1994. The metals Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Lead, Selenium and Thallium were analyzed by GFAA. 303172 met cIcc.M 05161995 1330 Caae Number: 95053 Project Number: 29S72 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative X Chain of Custody Forms X Cover Page X Holding Times X Inorganic Analysis Data Sheets * Initial and Continuing Calibration Summary X ICP and AA CRDL Check Standard Summary NA Linear Range Verification Standard Summary * Calibration and Preparation Blank Summary X ICP Interference Check Sample Summary * Matrix Spike Summary X Post Digestion Spike Sample Summary * Duplicate Sample Surrmiary * Laboratory Control Sample Summary * Method of Standard Additions Summary X ICP Serial Dilution Summary X Quarterly Instrument Detection Limits Summary X Annual Interelement Correction Factors Summary jt- Quarterly ICP Linear Range Summary X Sample Preparation Log Summary X Sample Analysis Run Log Summary Sample Raw Data X ICP Raw Data X GFAA Raw Data X Mercury Raw Data * Cyanide Raw Data Comments: The IDL (Instrument Detection Limit) for Cyanide was not provided. The lab was contacted to submit this information. 303173 met_clcc. 14 05161995 1330 2 Form MET 1 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl SPECIHC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Were custody transfers correctly and completely documented? Yes[x] No Conunents: None Holding Times Were sample preparations and analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: None 303174 nv=t_elec.l4 J VJ J X / I 0516I»J5 1330 3 - —«.„ -. ... Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Islaiil Chemical Company - RI Instrument Calibration Were instruments calibrated daily and each time that sample analyses were performed? Yes[x] No Were the instruments calibrated using the minimum required numbers of blanks and standards? Yes[x] No For the GFAA methods was one standard analyzed at the Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL)? Yes[x] No For the applicable methods did the correlation coefficients meet the minimum requirement of 0.995? Yes[x] No NA For the cyanide analyses was a midrange standard distilled and analyzed? Yes[x] No NA Comments: For the Cyanide analyses, the raw data for the initial calibration were not submitted. At this point the calibration and its linearity cannot be verified. The lab was contacted to provide this information. Data were not qualified. Initial and Continuing Calibration Verification Were the calibration standards and blanks analyzed at the required frequencies? Yes[x] No Were the standard recoveries within QC limits? ^ Yes No[x] Comments: For Mercury, Form II, page 17, the CCV recovery is listed as 1814%, which is a typo and does not match the raw data. The lab was contacted to resubmit the corrected form. Data were not qualified. For Silver, one of the CCV recoveries was 89.9%, below the requirement of 90.0%. Therefore, the results for silver in the associated samples MWOOOl, MWOlOl, DWOOOl, DWOlOl, RBGWOO, MW0005, MW0004, DBGWOO, DW0005, DW0004, MW0003 and DW0003 were qualified as estimated (J). 303175 mct_clcc. 14 05161995 !330 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI CRDL Standards Were CRDL standards (CRI and CRA) analyzed at the required frequency? Yes[x] No Were the ICP standards (CRI) analyzed at the required levels? Yes[x] No For the low concentration method, were the CRDL results acceptable? Yes No NA[x] Comments: None Matrix Spike Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in this SDG? Yes[x] No Were field or rinse blanks used for the spike analysis sample? Yes No[x] Were the matrix spike recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes No[x] Were post-digestion spikes performed when required? Yes[x] No 303176 rT¥:t_clec.l4 05161995 1330 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Comments: Matrix spikes were performed for dissolved and total metals. For spike recoveries between 30.0% and 75.0%, the results of the affected analyte in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). For spike recoveries below 30.0%, the detections of that metal were qualified as estimated (J), while the non-detections were rejected (R). Cyanide was spiked at four times the reporting limit and no spike recovery was observed. Until the lab can provide more information for the Cyanide analyses, the results for Cyanide have to be rejected (R). The table below lists the exceeding spike recoveries and the associated investigative samples and qualifiers. Analyte Beryllium Copper Lead Manganese Mercury Aluminum Beryllium Iron Cyanide % Recovery 60.0 71.3 35.7 36.8 33.4 73.0 7.5 36.9 0 Associated samples DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, DBGWOO DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, DBGWOO DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, DBGWOO DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, DBGWOO DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, DBGWOO MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl, RBGWOO Qualifier ilR R The Arsenic spike recoveries for both the dissolved and the total metals samples were above the upper acceptance limit of 125% (i.e., 131.2% for dissolved and 136.1% for total metals). However, because Arsenic was not detected in any of the investigative samples, qualification of data was not necessary. mct_clec. 14 05161995 1330 303177 Form MET 1.1 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID; Island Chemical Company - RI Laboratory Control Sample Were laboratory control sample analyses performed at the required frequency? Yes No[x] Were laboratory control sample recovery results acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: For Cyanide an LCS was not performed. No further qualification of data. ICP Interference Check Sample Were ICP interference check samples (ICS) analysed at the required frequency? Yes[x] No Were the ICS recovery criteria met? Yes[x] No Were results greater than the IDL reported for elements not present in the ICS solution? Yes[x] No Were negative results with absolute values greater than the IDL reported for elements not present in the ICS solution? Yes[x] No Were the concentrations of metals in the investigative samples similar to the concentrations of the ICS solution? Yes No[x] Did the sample results require qualification due to interference problems? Yes No[x] Comments: None 303178 mcl_cicc.!4 05161995 1330 Case Number; 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Duplicate Sample Results Were duplicate sample analyses performed at the required frequency? Yes[x] No Did the duplicate sample results meet acceptance criteria? Yes No[x] Comments: For the dissolved metals. Copper had a difference of 59.419 ug/1 and Lead had a difference of 13.197 ug/1, both larger than the required minimum difference of one CRDL. Therefore, the results for Copper and Lead in the investigative samples DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, and DBGWOO were qualified as estimated (J). For the total metals. Aluminum had a difference of 335.79 ug/1 and Iron had a %RPD of 25.5%, both exceeding the required QC limits of one CRDL or 20.0% RPD. Therefore, the results for Aluminum and Iron in the investigative samples MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl and RBGWOO were qualified as estimated (J). Zinc was marked by the lab as exceeding the QC criteria, but the results are acceptable, data were not qualified. Blank Analyses Were preparation and calibration blank analyses performed at the required frequency? Yes[x] No Were elements reported in the blanks at levels above the CRDL? Yes No[x] Were elements reported in the blanks at levels between the IDL and the CRDL? Yes[x] No Were negative results with absolute values greater than the IDL reported in the blanks? Yes[x] No If analytes were reported in the blanks, were the same analytes also reported for the associated investigative samples? Yes[x] No Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes[x] No Comments: See table "Blank Summary Form" for blank contamination and qualifiers added. The action levels for the blank contaminants are five times the amount found in the associated blank. Detections of these contaminants in the investigative samples below the appropriate action level were qualified as undetected (U). 303179 met cicc.l4 05161995 1330 8 Form MET I. Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl ICP Serial DUution Were serial dilution analyses performed at the required frequency? Yes[x] No For analytes with concentrations greater than 50 times the IDL, were the percent differences within acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: None GFAAQC Were duplicate injections performed for each GFAA sample analysis? Yes[x] No For results greater than the CRDL were the percent RSD results calculated correctly and within control limits? Yes[x] No NA Were the GFAA analytical spike (post-digestion spike) recoveries within acceptance criteria? Yes No[x] If the GFAA analytical spike recoveries were not acceptable, were samples diluted and reanalyzed when required? Yes No[x] Was the method of standard additions (MSA) used for GFAA analysis when required? Yes[x] No When MSA analyses were performed, were the correlation coefficients and spiking levels acceptable? Yes No[x] 303180 rT¥;l_clcc.!4 05161995 1330 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Comments: , For the following analytes the analytical spike recoveries exceeded 85%-115%. The samples were not reanalyzed at a dilution. Therefore, the results for the analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). Analyte Arsenic Antimony Beryllium Lead Selenium Sample ID DWOlOl DW0005 DW0005 DW0004 MW0003 MWOlOl DWOOOl DWOlOl DW0005 DW0004 MWOOOl MWOlOl RBGWOO MW0004 MW0003 MWOOOl MWOlOl DWOOOl DWOlOl MW0005 MW0004 DW0005 DW0004 MW0003 DW0003 % Recovery 119 119 81.5 82.0 82.5 28.1 84.3 83.5 84.5 84.1 78.5 82.7 83.9 78.8 70.7 81.1 76.1 77.0 77.2 80.7 57.0 72.5 56.3 28.3 42.4 Qualifier mel clcc.14 05161995 1330 10 Form M U r 1.1 303181 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Cbrmical Company - RI Thallium MWOOOl MWOlOl DWOOOl DWOlOl RGBWOO MW0005 MW0004 DW0005 DW0004 MW0003 DW0003 63.1 73.6 63.0 76.8 84.7 67.4 71.8 68.8 70.5 67.2 69.7 For the investigative sample DWOlOl the method of standard addition (MSA) was performed for the Lead analyses. The linear correlation coefficient was 0.9936, below the requirement of 0.995. The laboratory repeated the MSA analysis as per the method and obtained a correlation coefficient of 1.000. The lab reported the result from the run with the correlation coefficient of 0.9936 (i.e., 13.1 ug/1) and flagged the result with " + ". Instead the lab should have reported the results from the run with the correlation coefficient of 1.000 (i.e., 12.3 ug/1) and flagged the result with the letter "S". These changes have been made on Form I by the data reviewer. met dec. 14 05161995 1330 11 Form MET 1.1 303182 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI ICP Interelement Correction Factors Were annual interelement correction factors provided for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? Yes[x] No Comments: None ICP Linear Ranges Were linear ranges provided for each instrument used for sample analysis and were they current? Yes No[x] Was a quarterly linear range verification analysis performed and if so, were the results acceptable? Yes[x] No For the low concentration method was a linear range standard analysis performed as required, and if so, were the results acceptable? Yes No NA[x] Comments: The ICP linear ranges provided were dated 1/26/95, which is beyond the quarterly requirement of the method. No data were qualified as result of this problem. Log Books Were all sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Were all sample analyses properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Comments: None mcl dec. 14 05161995 1330 1 2 Form MCT 1.1 303183 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Islai^ Chemical Company - Rl Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes[x] No Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated and reported correctly? Yes[x] No NA For the applicable methods, were peak measurements performed correctly? Yes No NA[x] Were detection limits provided for the reported target analytes, and if so, were they current and acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: For Cyanide the IDL were not reported. The lab was contacted to supply that information. Data were not further qualified. For the GFAA analyses of Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Lead, Selenium and Thallium the analyst did not differentiate the client sample ID between dissolved and total metal analyses. The correct samples can only be tracked by the Lab ID. See copies attached for corrected client IDs. Data were not qualified as a result of this problem. 303184 met dec. 14 05161995 1330 1 3 Case Number; 9.5053 Projccl Number: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chcmicyl Company - Ri HOLDING TIME QUAUHCATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Identification Analyte Date Sampled Date Prepared Date Analyzed Analysis Holding Time Qualifier o l-» 0 0 tjl Comments: None ™i_clcc.l4 05161995 1330 14 Case Number; 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - RI BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID CCB CCB Prepblank Prepblank Prepblank 1 CCB 1 CCB Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Iron Manganese Selenium Blank Result (ug/1) -33.7 -1.8 -2.020 0.180 -12.197 1.5 1.6 Action Level (ug/1) 168.5 9.0 10.1 0.9 61.0 7.5 8.0 Qualified Samples DWOlOl DBGWOO, DWOlOl DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0005, DWOlOl, MWOOOl, MWOlOl, MW0003 DBGWOO, DW0003, DW0005, DWOlOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005 DWOOOl, DWOlOl None None Qualifier U U U U u - - Comments: Detections of the listed analytes in the investigative sample below the action level were qualified as undetected (U) due to blank contaminadon. o CO C» trtl^clcc. 14 05161995 1330 15 Form MliT 1.1 Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Islajxi Chemical Cotnpany - RI Summary and Conclusions The analytical results for the metal analyses are acceptable for use as qualified. For Silver, one of the CCV recoveries was below the QC requirement of 90.0%. Therefore, the results for silver in the associated samples MWOOOl, MWOlOl, DWOOOl, DWOlOl, RBGWOO, MW0005, MW0004, DBGWOO, DW0005, DW0004, MW0003 and DW0003 were qualified as estimated (J). Matrix spikes were performed for dissolved and total metals. For spike recoveries between 30.0% and 75.0%, the results of the affected analyte in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). For spike recoveries below 30.0%, the detections of that metal were qualified as estimated (J), while the non- detections were rejected (R). The results for Cyanide have to be rejected (R) due to zero recovery of the matrix spike. The table in the report lists the exceeding spike recoveries and the associated investigative samples and qualifiers. For the dissolved metals, Copper and Lead exceeded the required minimum difference of one CRDL for duplicate analysis. Therefore, the results for Copper and Lead in the investigative samples DWOOOl, DW0003, DW0004, DW0005, DWOlOl, and DBGWOO were qualified as estimated (J). For the total metals. Aluminum and Iron exceeding the required QC limits for duplicate analysis. Therefore, the results for Aluminum and Iron in the investigative samples MWOOOl, MW0003, MW0004, MW0005, MWOlOl and RBGWOO were qualified as estimated (J). Blank contamination was observed for Aluminum, Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Iron, Manganese and Selenium. Reported detections below five times the amount found in the associated blank in the investigative samples were qualified as undetected (U). See table "Blank Summary Form" for blank contamination and qualifiers added. For several analytes the analytical spike recoveries for GFAA analyses exceeded the QC criteria. See the report for a complete list. Therefore, the results for these analytes in the associated investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). For the investigative sample DWOlOl the method of standard addition (MSA) was performed for the Lead analyses and did not meet the linear correlation coefficient criteria. The lab repeated the MSA and obtained acceptable results, but then reported the wrong result with an incorrect qualifier. These errors were corrected on the Form I by the data reviewer. Validator's Signature: /tXj-jUM. H A A Validator's Initials: \i(H Validation Date: '? "^ - ^ £ QC Reviewer's Signature: ^^^^^AXcutA ' ^ ^^'^^^-.y^^e^ QC Reviewer's Initials: /V/*'/' Review Date: 1 / / 9 / T S ~ 303187 nicl_c Ice. 14 05161*^5 1330 1 6 Form MET l.l T Name; PACE Lab Code: GULF Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % solids: 0.0 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. DBGWOO SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XHH005 Date Received: 05/12/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 ICAS NO. 1 1 17429-90-5 1 17440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 17440-39-3 17440-41-7 17440-43-9 17440-70-2 17440-47-3 (7440-48-4 17440-50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-09-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 17440-66-6 157-12-5 1 Analyte Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium | Beryllium! Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium IThallium Vanadium Zinc 1 Cyanide 1 Concentration] 19.8 1 1.4 1 1.5 1 11.8 1 0.18 I 2.4 1 40.4 1 2.2 3.8 23.0 12.1 14.5 29.7 1.5 0.26 10.3 348 1.6 3.6 475 2.6 3.6 55.7 1 1 1 C| Q Ul 1 -BIWC^ 1 U|N 1 u-f 1 ^N(/3 1 Ul 1 Bl 1 Ul Ul B|N*n Ul INS* 7 uj2r UjNT INJ Ul Ul Ul U P Bl Ul , lui 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV| P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 |P 1 |P 1 1 1 1 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO : VALIDATED Peviev/cri 137 . .fikiii^ii Date FORM I - IN -9-^-1^ IkjA 303188 ILM02.0 080004 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. DWOOOl • INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: PACE Contract: | | _>ab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095053 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: XGU005 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 05/12/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 11 II CAS No. 1 Analyte |Concentration|C| Q |M | 1 1 1 1 1 1 7429-90-5 ^Aluminum | 19.8 |U| IP 1 7440-36-0 lAntimony 1 1.4 |U|W |F | 7440-38-2 [Arsenic j 2.4 I^N L/ IF | 7440-39-3 IBarium | 161 |B| |P | 7440-41-7 IBerylliuml 0.10 |U|N:J |F | 7440-43-9 1 Cadmium | 2.4 |U| IP I 7440-70-2 ICalcium | 43000 | | |P | 7440-47-3 1 Chromium | 2.2 |U| IP | 7440-48-4 ICobalt | 3.8 1U| |P 1 7440-50-8 (Copper | 72.8 | |N*3 |P 1 7439-89-6 [Iron j 17.9 \W\U IP 1 7439-92-1 ILead | 14.3 | |NS*J |F | 7439-95-4 |Magnesium| 29500 | | |P | 7439-96-5 |Manganese| 1530 I |N3 |P | 7439-97-6 (Mercury ( 0.20 (JETINfJ |CV| 7440-02-0 INickel | 10.3 |U! |P 1 7440-09-7 IPotassiumI 1220 |BJ JP | 7782-49-2 [Selenium | 1.6 (U(WJ |F | 7440-22-4 [Silver [ 3.6 |U[:j jP [ 7440-23-5 (Sodium ( 384000 ( | (P | 7440-28-0 (Thallium | 2.6 |U|WCJ |F | 7440-62-2 (Vanadium [ 31.1 [B( (P [ 7440-66-6 (Zinc | 89.5 | J^ IP | 57-12-5 [Cyanide [ M i l 1 1 Mil Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO >/A!JDATE"> Revi'- .-o Cy (/rHh A-'i i - ^ Oau FORM I - IN 303189 ILM02.0 )05 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. DW0003 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET b Name: PACE Contract: | | Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095053 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: XHHOIO Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 05/12/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 i 1 [CAS No. 1 Analyte [Concentration[C I I 1 1 [7429-90-5 [Aluminum [ 19.8 [UJ [7440-36-0 [Antimony [ 1.4 [Ul (7440-38-2 (Arsenic ( 8.2 UB^ (7440-39-3 (Barium ( 236 [- [7440-41-7 (Berylliuml 0.20 [^ [7440-43-9 [Cadmium | 2.4 |UJ [7440-70-2 [Calcium 1 211000 [ _J 17440-47-3 1 Chromium | 2.2 |U (7440-48-4 (Cobalt [ 3.8 [U [7440-50-8 [Copper [ 13.4 (U (7439-89-6 [Iron ( 9770 [ (7439-92-1 [Lead ( 24.4 [_J 17439-95-4 [Magnesium| 89800 | (7439-96-5 [Manganese! 5130 [ (7439-97-6 (Mercury ( 0.42 [ (7440-02-0 [Nickel ( 10.3 [U (7440-09-7 (Potassium( 26500 [ (7782-49-2 (Selenium ( 1.6 [U (7440-22-4 (Silver ( 3.6 [U (7440-23-5 (Sodium | 348000 ( (7440-28-0 [Thallium ( 2.6 (U [7440-62-2 [Vanadium ( 3.6 (U [7440-66-6 (Zinc [ 52.4 [ [57-12-5 1 Cyanide [ [ Q [M 1 IP 1 W ^ IF ( NU (F ( IP ( rN03 IF 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 N*3 IP 1 IP 1 NS*3 IF 1 IP 1 NJ IP 1 Nl ICV( IP 1 IP 1 W7 IF ( 3 IP 1 IP 1 W:J I F I IP 1 1 IP 1 1 1 1 I I I ! Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed Date — . VALIDATED By /C6Z->4v I'l-'^S h^'( FORM I - IN 3 0 3 1 9 0 ILM02.0 06 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. DW0004 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ,ab Name: PACE Contract: ( ( Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095053 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: XHH007 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 05/12/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L CAS No. 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 19.8 1.4 1.5 75.1 0.10 2.4 48200 2.2 3.8 13.4 12.1 1.9 33800 705 0.45 10.3 1530 1.6 3.6 392000 2.6 22.1 49.7 c _ u u u B u u u u U u B u B u u u B Q W7 N NW3 N*J NW*3 N3 N3 Ml 3 W3 1 M 1 P 1 F 1 F I P 1 F ( P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F ( P 1 P 1 CV[ P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 1 1 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO VALIDATED Reviewed By l A . ' A ^ . JYe/.^ Date -^-^A FORM'I - IN 30319X ILM02.0 3? U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET | [ I DW0005 I b Name: PACE Contract: j j Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095053 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: XHH006 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 05/12/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L I I I 1 [CAS No. 1 Analyte [Concentration[C I I I 1 (7429-90-5 (Aluminum [ 19.8 [U 17440-36-0 (Antimony I 1.4 lU 17440-38-2 (Arsenic ( 1.8 (^ [7440-39-3 IBarium 1 164 IB" (7440-41-7 IBerylliuml 0.34 IBT (7440-43-9 (Cadmium j 2.4 [U [7440-70-2 (Calcium [ 64300 1 17440-47-3 [Chromium | 2.2 |U (7440-48-4 [Cobalt | 3.8 [U [7440-50-8 ICopper [ 22.5 [B 17439-89-6 [Iron | 105 | 17439-92-1 [Lead [ 44.4 [ [7439-95-4 (Magnesium[ 51500 [ [7439-96-5 [Manganese[ 81.4 [ (7439-97-6 (Mercury ( 0.21 (J [7440-02-0 (Nickel ( 10.3 [U (7440-09-7 [Potassium! 1210 (B [7782-49-2 [Selenium ( 1.6 (U [7440-22-4 (Silver ( 3.6 (U [7440-23-5 (Sodium ( 316000 ( 17440-28-0 (Thallium ( 2.6 [U 1 1 Q [M 1 1 1 IP 1 WJ (F ( NU3 [F [ IP 1 NWt;~l IF 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 N*:J IP 1 IP 1 NS*3 IF ( IP 1 N3 [P 1 N1 (CV1 IP 1 IP 1 W3 IF 1 .1 IP 1 • IP 1 WJ [F 1 [7440-62-2 [Vanadium | 27.7 [B[ [P [ [7440-66-6 [Zinc ( 76.5 [ | [P [ [57-12-5 [Cyanide ( ( I I I 1 1 1 Mil Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed Date ..— VALIDATED By A ^ " ^ - _ HM.r. -- T-^-5 FORM I - IN 303192 ILM02.0 080008 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. DWOlOl INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ,Lab Name: PACE Contract: [ j j^ab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: SDG No.: 095053 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: XGU006 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 05/12/95 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L CAS No. 7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-89-6 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 31.0 6.8 1.6 161 0.10 2.4 42400 2.2 3.8 34.7 26.3 1 1 ' } 1 1 1 l A - i 1 J . X 29200 1520 0.20 10.3 1290 1.6 3.6 381000 2.6 32.5 77.2 1 1 |C| Q 1 1 IBI^ \V1U |^|N^3 B| ^1 NW OJ U| 1 U[ Ul !N*J ^ \ U . [ U*y S3 1 IN J UlNvJ U| 1 B( [ U[WJ [ U[J ( 1 U|W 3 B| 1 1 1 1 1 IM 1 1 1 P 1 [F ( F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV[ P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviev/ed By Date '•• VALIDATED I ' l ~ IS FORM I - IN ILM02.0 303193 0^ ^b Name: PACE Lab Code: GULF Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. I I MWOOOl SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XGUOOl Date Received: 05/12/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 [CAS No. i 1 1 [7429-90-5 1 [7440-36-0 1 17440-38-2 1 [7440-39-3 1 17440-41-7 1 17440-43-9 1 [7440-70-2 (7440-47-3 ( [7440-48-4 [7440-50-8 [7439-89-6 [7439-92-1 [7439-95-4 [7439-96-5 [7439-97-6 17440-02-0 [7440-09-7 [7782-49-2 [7440-22-4 17440-23-5 [7440-28-0 [7440-62-2 [7440-66-6 [57-12-5 1 Analyte j Aluminum | Antimony Arsenic Barium Berylliuml Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc (Cyanide 1 Concentration 1330 ( 1.4 ( 3.9 ( 181 1.4 i 2.4 44900 2.2 3.8 13.4 1590 3.8 31200 1560 0.44 10.3 1260 1.6 3.6 397000 2.6 42.4 21.6 ( 10.0 1 C| _l 1 1 Q 1 1 N* J 1 U|W ( ^ N C ; ( Bl 1 |N3 1 U| 1 1 1 U( ( U( Ul (N*:^ |W1 1 u B u u u IB 1 , \A WJ J WJ NK M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV| P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 |P 1 |P 1 |AS| 1 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: • Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR ^(gviewed By Texture: Artifacts: NO X-^; 7-4i r. >i .-L '•.!• .».i..i^,* nna'Swu.w.nf FORM I - IN '0319^ ILM02.0 3001C b Name: PACE Lab Code: GULF Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0003 I. .1 SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XHH009 Date Received: 05/12/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L CAS No. i Analyte jConcentrationjC 7429-90-5 [Aluminum ( 1270 [ 7440-36-0 [Antimony [ 1,4 |U 7440-38-2 [Arsenic | 5.4 \W\ 7440-39-3 IBarium 1 125 [Bi 7440-41-7 [Berylliuml 0.18 [^ 7440-43-9 [Cadmium [ 2.4 [UJ 7440-70-2 (Calcium ( 211000 ( 7440-47-3 (Chromium ( 2.8 IB 1 1 Q [M 1 1 1 N*J IP 1 W T IF 1 N(y [F 1 IP 1 lU^ R IF 1 IP 1 (P 1 IP 1 7440-48-4 [Cobalt | 3.8 (U [P [ 7440-50-8 [Copper [ 13.4 |U |P | 7439-89-6 |Iron 1 11700 | N*J |P [ 7439-92-1 [Lead [ 1.6 (B Wi (F ( 7439-95-4 [Magnesiumj 90500 [ jP | 7439-96-5 [Manganese[ 5270 [ [P ( 7439-97-6 [Mercury ( 1.4 [ J [CV( 7440-02-0 (Nickel ( 10.3 (U (P ( 7440-09-7 [Potassium( 26400 ( (P [ 7782-49-2 (Selenium ( 16.0 \U 3 [F | 7440-22-4 (Silver ( 3.6 (U :i [P [ 7440-23-5 (Sodium ( 348000 1 [P | 7440-28-0 (Thallium ( 2.6 (U Wj [F | 7440-62-2 (Vanadium ( 15.3 (B [P | 7440-66-6 (Zinc | 22.9 | (P ( 57-12-5 (Cyanide ( 10.0 ( X N R [ AS ( 1 1 I I I Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed Date.i». VALIDATED By lA-^Ai. tUA •^A-9S FORM. I - IN 303195 ILM02.0 10011 i^b Name: PACE Lab Code: GULF Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 U,S. EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. MW0004 I. SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XHH003 Date Received: 05/12/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L 1 1 1 Mil 1 CAS No. 1 Analyte [Concentration[C| Q (M [ 1 1 1 M i l [7429-90-5 (Aluminum [ 2670 1 IN*J |P [ (7440-36-0 (Antimony ( 1.4 (U(W (F ( (7440-38-2 (Arsenic ( 1.5 (U(N [F [ (7440-39-3 (Barium [ 145 (B[ |P ( [7440-41-7 (Beryllium! 0.24 (X( N>/R [F ( (7440-43-9 (Cadmium [ 2.4 [U[ (P [ 17440-70-2 [Calcium 1 53500 ( ( [P ( [7440-47-3 [Chromium [ 2.2 [U[ (P [ (7440-48-4 (Cobalt ( 8.3 (Bl (P I [7440-50-8 [Copper ( 13.4 [U( [P [ [7439-89-6 [Iron ( 2560 [ (N*J (P [ (7439-92-1 ILead [ 2.1 |B|W3 (F [ [7439-95-4 [Magnesium[ 36000 [ [ (P ( [7439-96-5 [Manganese( 1170 [ [ |P [ [7439-97-6 [Mercury [ 0.31 [[ |CV| (7440-02-0 (Nickel ( 12.0 (B( (P | (7440-09-7 [Potassium( 1610 [B[ (P [ [7782-49-2 [Selenium ( 1.6 (U|W3 (F ( (7440-22-4 [Silver ( 3.6 (U(rT |P 1 (7440-23-5 [Sodium ( 394000 ( | (P ( (7440-28-0 [Thallium ( 2.6 [U|W3 (F ( (7440-62-2 (Vanadium ( 44.2 (B( (P ( 17440-66-6 (Zinc | 25.9 | [ |P | 157-12-5 [Cyanide | 10.0 (XI N R | AS ( [ ( 1 l i l t Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed Date VAUPATED dBy A ^ ^ - - ^ ' ^ FORM I - IN 303196 ILM02.0 080012 ^b Name: PACE Lab Code: GULF Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Contract: Case No.: HLA SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. I I MW0005 I SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XHH002 Date Received: 05/12/95 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L [CAS No. (7429-90-5 17440-36-0 17440-38-2 [7440-39-3 [7440-41-7 [7440-43-9 (7440-70-2 [7440-47-3 (7440-48-4 [7440-50-8 [7439-89-6 17439-92-1 (7439-95-4 (7439-96-5 [7439-97-6 [7440-02-0 [7440-09-7 [7782-49-2 (7440-22-4 [7440-23-5 (7440-28-0 [7440-62-2 [7440-66-6 [57-12-5 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide Concentration 306 1.4 1.5 162 0.15 2.4 66000 2.2 3.8 13.4 339 20.3 52000 108 0.20 10.3 1320 1.6 3.6 314000 2.6 30.3 20.3 10.0 1 C| Q 1 [N*i/J U|W U[N B| LBIN^R U[ 1 Ul U| U( |N*J IS 1 U| U| Bl U|W3 un 1 U[W1 B[ 1 UA^d 1 M 1 p 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV[ p 1 p 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 AS I ... 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Reviewed By Date FORM I - IN Texture: Artifacts: NO VALIDATEp •C.^A^c k£A^ A2,J± 303197 ILM02.0 U80013 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET [• [ b Name: PACE Contract; Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L I MWOlOl I I I SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XGU002 Date Received: 05/12/95 1 J (CAS No. 1 1 (7429-90-5 [ [7440-36-0 [ [7440-38-2 [7440-39-3 (7440-41-7 I (7440-43-9 [7440-70-2 [7440-47-3 17440-48-4 [7440-50-8 [7439-89-6 [7439-92-1 [7439-95-4 [7439-96-5 [7439-97-6 [7440-02-0 [7440-09-7 [7782-49-2 [7440-22-4 [7440-23-5 [7440-28-0 17440-62-2 [7440-66-6 [57-12-5 1 Analyte Aluminum Antimony [ Arsenic Barium ( Beryllium[ Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide 1 Concentration 7890 1.4 [ 3.4 177 1.6 2.4 39800 7.0 5.5 18.7 9980 2.8 28900 1450 0.20 14.1 1700 1.6 3.6 349000 2.6 55.0 77.9 1 10.0 \ C u X B u B B B B u .B B u u Q N*3 1 W I H U 1 N~^ 1 N*D WJ WJ 1 lUIW.T 1 1 1 1 UJINK r 1 M 1 P 1 F 1 F 1 P 1 F ( P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 CV[ P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 F 1 P 1 P 1 [AS| 1 1 Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: WHITE PARTICLES Clarity Before: OPAQUE Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: YES VALHDATEP Reviewed By A ^ ' ^ A ftr^(<^ Date • -2_2-l£. FORM I - IN 303198 ILM02.0 U80014 I RBGWOO U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET i^h Name: PACE Contract: Lab Code: GULF Case No.: HLA SAS No.: Matrix (soil/water): WATER Level (low/med): LOW % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L SDG No.: 095053 Lab Sample ID: XHHOOl Date Received: 05/12/95 1 1 1 Mil [CAS No. ( Analyte (Concentration!C| Q |M ( 1 1 [ ( I I I [7429-90-5 [Aluminum [ 19.8 [U|N*J |P ( (744 0-3 6-0 lAntimony ( 1.4 (U [7440-38-2 [Arsenic [ 1.5 [U (7440-39-3 [Barium [ 11.8 [Uj (7440-41-7 [Berylliuml 0.10 (JtT [7440-43-9 [Cadmium ( 2.4 (U (7440-70-2 ICalcium | 54.8 | BJ 17440-47-3 [Chromium | 2.2 |U 17440-48-4 ICobalt [ 3.8 [U 17440-50-8 (Copper ( 49.1 ( (7439-89-6 [Iron ( 12.1 [U [7439-92-1 [Lead [ 6.2 ( [7439-95-4 [Magnesium[ 29.7 (U [7439-96-5 [Manganese[ 1.5 (U (7439-97-6 [Mercury [ 0.20 (U (7440-02-0 (Nickel ( 15.2 (B [7440-09-7 (Potassium( 348 [U (7782-49-2 (Selenium | 1.6 (U [7440-22-4 [Silver [ 3.6 [U W IF 1 N IF 1 IP 1 NR IF 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 IP 1 N*J IP 1 W T IF ( IP 1 (P 1 |CV| IP 1 IP ( 1 IF ( [J IP 1 (7440-23-5 (Sodium [ 287 [B[ (P [ 17440-28-0 (Thallium ( 2.6 (U(W J (F | [7440-62-2 [Vanadium ( 3.6 (U[ [P ( (7440-66-6 [Zinc ( 47.5 (J |P [ (57-12-5 (Cyanide | 10.0 UTINR (AS ( 1 1 1 [ I I I Color Before: COLORLESS Color After: COLORLESS Comments: Clarity Before: CLEAR Clarity After: CLEAR Texture: Artifacts: NO Reviewed Date . . . VALIDATED By lA-^lf^u^ i^Li^ FORM I - IN 303199 ILM02.0 080015 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for A s yc: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Data file: JgSa2A.PRN i..ab JD/Client ID Dlgestate re^suXt 0 27.9 42.3 90.0 57.4 17.3 70. 1 S10 S25 S50 ^ S100' ICV / ICE / e CRA / 9 CCV f 10 CCB ^ 11 PBW13497 12 PBW13497A 13 PBW13497A ^ 14 LCSW13497 15 LCSW13497A 16 XGU001/nW0001 17 XGU001A/MW0001A 18 XGU002/HW0101 19 XGU002A/HW0101A 20 XGU0035/HW0001S 2 1 CCV -2.. 22. CCB " ^ .XGU004D/MW0001D 1U004]^A/MW0001D ^ 2 ^ .GU005/:^W0001 ^ 2 6 XGU005A/:X^0001A ^ 2 7 XGU006/ifW0101 :>2a XGU006A/Xw0101A 2 9 XGU007S/MW0001S (.<^^r 5 4 . 9 3 0 XCU0a7GA/MWQ0ffliC i-LtiU ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L .68 ug/L 9.81 ug/L 50.1 ug/L .29 ug/L -2.02 ug/L ug/L ug/L •M^ 3.93 ug/L 3. 38 ug/L 58.3 ug/L 50.5 ug/L .24 ug/L 2.35 ug/L 2.41 ug/L 1.55 ug/L ug/L 31 XGU008D/MW0001D 32 XGU006DA/MW0001D 33 CCV3 . 34 CCBJ 35 XHH001/RBGW00 36 XHH001A/RBGW00A 37 XHH002/MW0005 38 XHH002A/rtW0005A 39 XHH003/MW0004 40 XHH003A/I1W0004A .65 ug/L 51.5 ug/L -.07 ug/L -.03 ug/L -1.31 ug/L -.62 ug/L Sample* result 2.0 ug/L 2.0 27.9 42.3 90.0 95.7 Pass 98. 1 100 Pass OK 96.6 Fail 117 70.7 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L K y. •/. % % 3.93 ug/L 94.7 % 3.38 ug/L 111 % 58.3 ug/L 101 '/. Pass 2.35 ug/L 114 •/. 100 2.0 119 54.9 94.8 2. 0 113 103 Pass 2.0 91.3 2.0 103 2.0 92. 1 •/. ug/L % ug/L % ug/L y. y. ug/L y, ug/L y. ug/L y. Sample* Flag Factor U. U 2 . 4 1 u g / L B _ U W U U U U . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 I n j e c t i o n T i m e 1 0 3 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 4 0 1 0 4 6 1 0 5 1 1 0 5 7 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 7 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 9 1 1 2 4 D a t e 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 1 2 9 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 1 3 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 2 3 6 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 2 4 1 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 3 2 6 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 3 3 2 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 6 1 1 5 1 1 1 5 7 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 8 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 9 1 2 2 5 1 2 3 0 1 2 4 7 1 2 5 2 1 2 5 8 1 3 0 4 1 3 0 9 1 3 1 5 1 3 2 1 1 3 3 7 1 3 4 3 1 3 4 8 1 3 5 4 1 4 0 0 1 4 0 5 Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Vater ODL 10. il ug/L \£Si (.a.fl ug/L 60 - 120 X recovery Host digt«t. spike 20.0 ug/L &ri - 115 X recovery MU deootes run not used. H denotes duplicate injection IBSD exceeds 20X. Hdenotes post tipike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. ^ ^ ^ tes recovery excursion (includes need ior HilA). . ^ 9 ^ .te« Klani is belov IDL given. age 1 oi 2 Soil IDL Soil CSDL LCSS 0.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g 150.0 ug/g 7b 224 X recovery b denotes value betveen IDL and CKDL. U denotes not detected above IDI. given, t denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution las run for the cycle. llK denotes blank is above IDL but bflov CRDL given. 09:59/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 80162 303200 PACli/NQ Metals Department Run Log for Instrument J f or (As^ Data file: J0602A.PRN Cyc: Lab ID/Client 3D D41 XHH005^R%GW00 ^42 XHH005Ai^BGW00A -^43 XHH006AH^000S ^ 4 XHHe06A>:^W000SA 45 CCV t^ 46 CCB ^ / ^47 X H H 0 0 7 ; K V 0 0 0 4 -^8 XHH0O7A/>(W0004A 49 XHH009/MW0003 5 0 XHH009A/KW0003A D 5 1 X H H 0 1 0 / ^ 0 0 0 3 "052 XHH01-0Ay^W0003A 53 CCV:s^ 54 CCB A ' hi, t>V t.ft b?) 6 0 €.1 (.2 fe Dlge'State result .3 1.75 54.8 .28 -.45 5.4 8.18 54.1 .26 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Sampl£° result 2.0 i©2 2.0 119 110 Pass 2.0 103 5.4 109 8. 18 105 108 Pass ug/L % ug/L % y. ug/L % ug/L % ug/L % % ^ £.£. fe>'/ (.8 £.^> 7 0 71 7 2 7H 7 4 7 h Vf. 7 7 7 a 7«) a 0 Sample Injection Flag Factor Time Date U_ 1.0 1411 06/02/95 1.0 1416 06/02/95 U_ 1.0 1422 06/02/95 _W 1.0 1427 06/02/95 1.0 1433 06/02/95 1.0 1439 06/02/95 U_ 1.0 1444 06/02/95 1.0 1449 06/02/95 B_ 1.0 1455 06/02/95 1.0 1500 06/02/95 B_ 1.0 1506 06/02/95 1.0 1511 06/02/95 1.0 1517 06/02/95 1.0 1522 06/02/95 Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Hater CkOL 10.0 ug/L liLiil (A.0 ug/L ft0 - 120 X recovery Pcjirl digpBt. spike 20.0 ug/1. Bfi - 115 X recovery denotes run not used. H denotes duplicate injection X8SD exceeds 20X. U otes pont spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. D es recovery extnirsion (includes need ior H!!A). 4 S S ^ ces blank is belov IDL given. (IK l^^ol Soil Soil LCSS IDL CkDl. 9.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g h0.d ug/g 75 - 224 I recovery denotes value between IDL and CSDL. denotes not detected above IDL given. denotes Interference. Value below - DL or post spike < 40X. denotes autoiatic 1:4 dilution sas run for the cycle. denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. ge _2_ of _2_ 09:59/06-05-95 (3F42 303201 ETC/(JS 02/01/94 rev "^^163 PACIC/NO Hetals Departmt»nt Run Log for Cnstrum»nt J f o r ^ ^ Data file: J0607A.PRN ^ C y c L a b 1 D / C l l « » n t I D i S 0 . ^ 2 S 5 ^ 3 S 2 5 4 S 5 0 5 5 1 0 0 6 ICV 7 8 ICV / 9 ICB ' 1 0 CRA / 11 CCV / 1 2 CCB ' 1 3 PBW13496 14 PBW1349eA 1 5 LCSW13498 1 6 LCSW13498A 1 7 XGU001/MW0001 1 8 XGU001A/HW0001A 1 9 XGU002/11W0101 2 0 XGU002A/MW0101A - 2 1 XGU003S/MW0001S f;fc/»' D i g e s t a t e r e s u l t 0 0 3 1 . 6 3 8 . 7 7 8 . 3 0 5 9 . 8 - . 7 3 . 8 5 1 . 3 - . 3 - . 8 6 1 . 3 - 3 . 6 - 4 . 3 5 1 . 3 • ^ ^ ' ^ ] • - • 1" liti-it M c v ^ 2 4 CCB ' ^ - 2 5 XGU004D/MW0001D 2 6 XGU004DA/MW0001D 2 7 X G U 0 0 5 / > r t 0 0 0 1 D 2 8 X G U 0 0 5 A / ^ 0 0 0 1 A !> 2 9 X G U 0 0 6 / ^ 0 1 0 1 D 3 0 XGU006A/XW0101A A ; 3 1 XGU007S/MW0001S ^ofT 4 9 . 9 - 1 . 8 - 3 . 3 - 2 . 3 6 . 9 5 3 . 2 3 2 XOUO07GA/MW00aiC ?ft<-t? 3 3 XGU008D/MW00O1D 3 4 XGU008DA/MW0001D 3 5 CCV J 3 6 CCB -7 3 7 XHHO01/RBGW00 3 8 XHH001A/RBGW00A 3 9 XHH002/MW0005 4 0 XHH002A/MW0005A Hater IDL 2.0 ug/L Hater CBDL 2.0 ug/L m7l 1000.0 ug/L 80 Cost digest, spike 20.0 ug/L fiT. 811 denotes run not used. - 3 . 4 5 1 . 3 0 . 4 - 1 . 9 u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L • 120 X recovery - 115 X recovery ij^notes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. I ^ B tes post spike recovery is acfeptable but «^^..ateB re<»very excursion (includeu need for 'ASS denotes blank is belov IDL given. requires flag. HSA). SampJe* r e s u l t 2 . 0 2 . 0 3 1 . 6 3 8 . 7 7 8 . 3 0 9 9 . 7 P a s s 1 9 0 1 0 3 P a s s P a s s 9 6 . 0 6 . 1 6 0 . 0 - 3 . 6 1 1 0 0 - 4 . 3 3 9 8 . 0 5 1 . 3 7 4 . 0 9 9 . 8 P a s s - 3 . 3 1 8 5 . 0 - 2 . 3 1 8 5 . 0 6 . 8 6 1 0 7 5 3 . 2 7 7 . 0 - 3 . 3 7 9 0 . 5 1 0 3 P a s s 2 . 0 9 6 . 5 2 . 0 8 7 . 5 u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L y. y. % y. y. y. % u g / L y. u g / L y. u g / L y. y. u g / L y. u g / L % u g / L y. u g / L y. u g / L y. % u g / L y. u g / L y. Soil IDL Soil CkDL U ^ S a m p l e F l a g F a c t o r U U_ • • _ • E _ EZ * EI E3 » E _ U_ U_ 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0.4 ug/g 0.4 ug/g 29.fi ug/g 13 B denotes value betveen IDL and CRDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given K denotes interference. 4 denotes autoaatii (IK denotes blank is Value belov • I n j e c t i o n T i m e D a t e 1 2 0 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 1 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 1 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 2 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 2 7 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 3 2 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 3 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 4 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 4 7 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 5 2 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 2 5 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 0 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 0 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 1 4 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 1 9 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 2 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 3 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 3 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 4 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 4 7 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 5 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 3 5 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 0 4 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 0 9 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 1 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 2 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 3 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 3 7 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 4 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 4 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 4 5 4 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 0 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 0 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 1 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 1 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 2 2 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 2 7 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 3 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 - 130 X recovery 1. DL or post spike < 40X, : 1:4 dilution *as run for the cycle. above IDL but belov CRDL alven. n o n i i 'age 1 of 2 17:20/06-07-95 (3F42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 303202 PACK/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for pb) Data file: J0607A.PRN Sb Cyc Lab ID/Client 3D 41 XHH003/HW0004 42 XHH003A/HW0004A 4 3 X H H 0 0 5 i ^ G W 0 O -^ 4 4 XHH0O5A/^GW00A D 4 5 XHH006/:i(W0005 :> 4 6 XHH006A/|rWo0O5A 3) 4 7 CCV V 4 8 CCB Y 4 9 X H H 0 0 7 / ^ 0 0 0 4 3> 50 XHHO07A/^0004A D 51 XHH009/HW0003 52 XHH009A/HW0003A 53 XHH010/:»^0003 ^ 5 4 X H H 0 1 0 A i ^ 0 0 0 3 A 3 ' 5 5 C C V ^ 56 CCB A 1)7 iiO t)9 £>0 {i i,4 £.h (.£. £>8 £.9 7 0 7 1 7 2 7:^ 7 4 7 S 7f, 7 7 7ft 7?) 8 0 Digestate result -2.7 1.5 -.8 50.2 1.0 -4.7 -. 1 -1. 1 47.5 -.9 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Sam pie result -2.68 90.5 2.0 114 2.0 81.5 100 Pass -4.67 82.0 2.0 82.5 2.0 96.5 95.0 Pass ug/L % ug/L % ug/L y. y. ug/L y. ug/L y. ug/L y. y. Flag E_ U_ iP _w FI _w u_ _w u_ Sample Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I n j e c t i o n T i m e D a t e 1 5 3 9 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 4 4 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 5 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 5 5 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 0 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 0 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 1 2 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 1 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 2 3 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 2 8 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 3 4 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 3 9 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 4 5 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 5 0 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 6 5 6 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 1 7 0 1 0 6 / 0 7 / 9 5 Hater IDL 2.0 ug/L Soil IDL Hater CRDL 2.0 ug/L Soil CkDL IXS* 1000.0 ug/L 60 - 120 X recovery LC£S FoBt digest, spike 20.0 ug/L 85 - 115 X recovery MlL^denotes run not used. B -ttes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. U jtes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. t « denotes recovery excursion (includes need for HilA). 4 'ASS denotes blank is belov IDL given. OK 5ano 7 n f 7 0.4 ug/g 0.4 ug/g 29.8 ug/g 13 - 130 X recovery denotes value between IDL and CKDL. denotes not detected above IDL given. denotes Interference. Value belov • DL or post spike < 40X. denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. Q 8 0 1 B 5 17:20/06-07-95 GFA7 ETC/RS 02/01/94_rev 3 032 03 PACIi/NlD Metals Department ^jk Data file: H06O8A. Cyc Lab 3D/Cllent ID 1 £0 • 2 SI 3 S 2 4 S4 • 5 S8 6 ICV/ 7 ICB/^ 8 CRA A 9 CCV / 10 CCB'' 11 PBW13497 * 12 PBW13497A 13 LCSW13497 14 LCSW13497A 15 XGU001/HW00O1 16 XGU0O1A/MWO001A 17 XGUO02/MWO101 18 XGU002A/HW0101A 19 XGU0O3S/MW0001S 20 XGU003SA/MW0O01S 21 CCV 2 jfl^-^CB 1 ^ 24 21. 2f. 27 2£l 2S) H0 :^i 'AT. 3:^ :s4 Cih H€. 37 :Hf\ :^9 40 PRN Digestate result 0 0 2.07 3.59 7.88 3.29 .09 1.05 3.71 .09 . 18 4.67 1.38 1.64 1.75 4. 12 .06 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Run Log for £:ampj e refiul t 0 0 2.07 3.59 7.88 Fail Fail Fail 1.38 1.64 1.75 Fail ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Instrument Flag ~M IF IM I" Sample Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 H for lie lnj( Time 1121 1125 1129 1133 1137 1142 1146 1150 1154 1159 1203 1207 1212 1216 1220 1225 1229 1234 1238 1242 1247 1251 - Pt:tlon DHte 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 lU 0 X recovery 0 X recovery Hater IDL 0.0 ug/L Hater CRM. 0.0 ug/L LC<ni 0.0 ug/L 0 foBt digest, spike 0.0 ug/L 0 denotes run not used. B otes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. U <tes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. K • denotes recovery excursion (includes need lor Hi'i). 4 'ASS denotes blank is belot IDL given. OX 'age _ 1 _ of X Soil IDL Soil CRDL LCSS 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0 - 0 X recovery denotes value betveen IDL and CRDL. denotes not detected above IDL given. denotes interference. Value belov • DL or post spike < 40X. denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. 0 R O 1 6 ( 09:09/06-12-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 3~032 04 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument H for Be Data file: H0608B.PRN i B Lab I D / C l i e n t I SO ^ X 2 S 1 3 3 2 ^ 4 S4^"^-v^^ 5 S8 ^">>v. 6 ICV ^"^-.s^^ 7 ICB B CRA 9 CCV 10 CCB 11 SO 12 S I 13 S2 14 S4 15 S8 16 17 SO 18 SI 19 S2 20 S4 21 S8 22 ICV ^^ ^ . 23 / ^ ^ / ^ -2« 2A. SO # ' ^ ' ^ ^ =,2 27 S4 28 S8 29 ICV Z 30 ICB t . 31 CRA 2. 32 CCV 7 33 CCB 1 34 XGU004D/MW0001D D • ^ • ^ ^ ^ A 3 5 XGU004DA/MW0001D 36 XGUOOS-^OOOl T? 37 XGU005A/«V0001A 38 XGU006-^«V0101 D 3> 39 XGU006A//KV0101A D 40 XGU007S/MW0001S Vater IDL 0.0 Vater CRDL 0.0 LCSH 0.0 Post digest, spike 0.0 MU denotes run not used. H denotes duplicate injection H denotes post spike recovery • denotes recovery excursion Pig^notes blank is belov IDL i ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L D i g e s t a t e r e s u l t 0 0 2 . 5 9 2 . 8 3 5 . 8 5 3 . 1 4 . 0 4 ^ v ^ . 9 7 > > ^ . 0 3 " 0 . 8 7 2 . 5 1 2 . 6 8 5 . 9 2 0 0 2 . 2 9 3 . 13 7 . 3 3 . 5 4 . 0 2 . 9 5 2 . 3 5 3 . 0 1 6 . 7 3 3 . 2 . 0 2 . 9 6 4 . 2 3 . 0 1 . 8 7 . 0 5 . 1 3 . 0 u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L \ *"«»SA- vi ug/C"-^ u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L 0 - OX recovery 0 - OX recovery XRSD exceeds 20X. Sam] p i e r e s u l t 0 0 2 . 5 9 2 . 8 3 5 . 8 5 F a i l ^ ^ \ F a i l <^ ° ^ • ^ . 8 7 ^ ^ 2.88^ 5 . 9 2 0 0 2 . 2 9 3 . 13 7 . 3 . 0 2 . 9 5 2 . 3 5 3 . 0 1 6 . 7 3 F a i l F a i l . 8 7 . 0 5 . 1 3 . 0 u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L "1>«<L ug/t>» u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L Soil IDL Soil CRDL IXSS F l a g _M _M IF _M IF Sample [ F a c t o r 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ^^"•s^ 1 . 0 ^ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g ( B denotes value betveen IDL and CRDL. I n j e c t i o n Time 1345 1349 1354 1358 1402 1406 1410 1414 1419 1423 1427 1431 1435 1439 1443 1528 ^4^32 1 ^ 3 ^ 1540 1544 1548 1554 1558 1603 1607 1611 1615 1619 1623 1628 1632 1636 1640 1645 1649 1653 1658 1702 3- OX U denotes not detected above IDL given. is acceptable but requires flag. E denotes interference. (includes need for HSAl. given. Value belov 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas : D a t e 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 "tr6<08/95 06/0&>C55 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 recovery - DL or post spike < 40X. run for the cycle. OK denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. 08:08/06-09-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev i'N r \ . ^s. » — 303205 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument H for Be Data file: H060aB.PRN f 41 42 43 44 45 Lab ID/Client ID XGU007SA/HW0001S XGU008D/HW0001D XGU008DA/HW0001D CCW f CCB ^ Digestate result .03 ug/L 4.37 ug/L .02 ug/L Sample result Flag .03 ug/L IF Fail M Sample Injection Factor Time Date 1.0 1706 06/08/95 1.0 1710 06/08/95 1.0 1715 06/08/95 1.0 1719 06/08/95 1.0 1723 06/08/95 CHHOOl/RBGWOO 47 XHlroeiA^BGWOOA 48 XHH002/MW? 49 XHH002A/HW0005A 50 XHH003/HW0004 51 XHH003A/HW0004A 52 XHH005/RBGW00 53 XHH005A/RBGW00A 54 XHH006/HW0005 55 XHH006A/HW0005A 56 CCV 57 C C B /^'^/K •2-}' ^ .04 ug/L .11 ug/L 18 ug/L 33 ug/L 4.44 .01 ug/L " g / L .04 ug/L ( .11 ug/L ^ . 2 4 ug/L [/L n .33 ug/L Fail 1.0 1727 06/08/95 1.0 1731 06/08/95 1.0 1736 06/08/95 1.0 1740 06/08/95 1.0 1744 06/08/95 1.0 1748 06/08/95 1.0 1752 06/08/95 1.0 1756 06/08/95 1801 06/08/95 1. 0 ^"T»©S...,Q6/08/95 1.0 1809 0S7"08,C95_ 1.0 1613 06/08/95 58 59 60 61 62 i 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 SO SI- S2 • S4 S8 . ICV^ ICB.i CRA 1 CCV.^ CCB > XHHOOl/RBGWOO XHHOOIA/RBGWOOA XHH002/MW0005 XHH002A/MW0005A XHH003/WW0004 XHH003A/MW0004A XHH005^B6W00 D XHH005A/J?^GWOOA 1:) XHH006.^W0005 :2) XHH006A/XW0005A ^ CCB [, ZZZZZ2 - . 0 2 . 9 3 2. 35 3.04 6.43 3. 17 . 0 5 .97 4.36 . 0 5 . 0 9 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L . I S ug/L .24 ug/L .18 ug/L .34 ug/L 4.32 ug/L .04 ug/L Vater IDL 0.0 ug/L Vater CSDL 0.0 ug/L LCSV 0.0 ug/L 0 - OX recovery Post digest, spike 0.0 ug/L 0 - OX recovery WJ denotes run not used. II denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. V denotes post spike recovery i s acceptable but requires flag. I^'onotes recovery excursion (includes need for HSA). notes blank i s belov IDL given. - . 0 2 ug/L E_ 1.0 1817 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 . 9 3 ug/L 1.0 1821 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 2 . 3 5 ug/L 1.0 1826 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 3.04 ug/L 1.0 1830 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 6.43 ug/L 1.0 1834 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1838 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 F a i l 1.0 1842 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1846 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1851 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 F a i l 1.0 1855 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 . 0 9 ug/L 1.0 1859 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1903 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 . 1 5 ug/L 1.0 1907 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1912 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 .24 ug/L 1.0 1916 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1920 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 . 1 8 ug/L 1.0 1924 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 1.0 1928 06/08/95 .34 ug/L 1.0 1932 06/08/95 1.0 1937 06/08/95 1.0 1941 06/08/95 F a i l _M 1.0 1945 06/08/95 NU 1 . 0 1949 0 6 / 0 8 / 9 5 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0 - OX recovery Soil IDL Soil CRDL LCSS B denotes value betveen IDL and CRDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given. E denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. OK denotes blank i s above IDL but belov CBDL given. < 40X. 08:08/06-09-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 303206 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument H for Be Data file: H0608B.PRN Cyc -^81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 Lab ID/Client ID XUH007/HW0004 XHH009/HW0003 XHH009A/HW0003A XHHOlO/^0003 D XHHOiOA/^0003A J) CCV^ CCB^ Digestate result 1.69 ug/L .18 ug/L .2 ug/L 4.23 ug/L .04 ug/L Sample result 1.69 ug/L .18 ug/L Sample Injection Flag Factor Time Date .2 ug/L Fail M 4.0 1954 06/08/95 1.0 1958 06/08/95 4.0 2002 06/08/95 1.0 2006 06/08/95 4.0 2011 06/08/95 1.0 2015 06/08/95 1.0 2019 06/08/95 IOD 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 0 X recovery 0 X recovery NU H »Ld Vater IDL 0.0 ug/L Vater CRDL 0.0 ug/L LCSV 0.0 ug/L 0 Post digest, spike 0.0 ug/L 0 denotes run not used. B denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. U ^denotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. E lotes recovery excursion (includes need for HSA). 4 ctnotes blank is belov IDL given. OK Soil IDL Soil CBDL LCSS 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0.0 ug/g 0 - O X recovery denotes value betveen IDL and CSDL. denotes not detected above IDL given. denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL givQ.g 0 1 6 9 08:08/06-09-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 3 032 07 PACl-:/NO H e t a l s D e p a r t m t > n t D a t a f i l e : J 0 6 0 1 A • CyL L a b I D / C l l e n t ID ^ XHHOO5/RBGW00 4^SXHH005A/RBGW00A 4 3 X)H10e6/HW0005 4 4 XHH0B^/HWO0O5A 4 5 CCV \ ^ ^ 4 6 CCB \ ^ 4 7 XHH0O7/HW0O04. 4 8 XHH007A/HWOO04Vs. 4 9 XHH009/HW0O03 \ 5 0 XHH009A/MW0003A 5 1 XHH010/HWO003 5 2 XHHO10A/MW0003A 5 3 CCV 5 4 CCB 5 5 SO 5 6 5 1 0 5 7 S 2 5 5 8 S 5 0 5 9 S1O0 6 0 ICV 6 1 ICB 6 2 CRA &3 CCV ^m zcB ^ ^ XHHO07/WW0004 6 6 XHH007A/MW0004A 6 7 XHH009/MW0003 6 8 XHH009A/MW0003A 6 9 XHH010/KW0003 7 0 XHH010A/MW0003A 7 1 CCV 72 CCB y^^A" 2 o A 73 S0 ^ 7 4 S 3 V > 7 5 S 2 5 ^ 7 6 S 5 0 7 7 S 1 0 0 7 8 ICV'' 7 9 I C B / 8 0 CRA/ Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Vater CRDL 10.0 ug/L LCSV L0.0 ug/L Poet dlgeirt.. spike 20.0 ug/L lU denotes run not used. .PRN D i g e s t a t e r e s u l t 1 . 3 5 1 . 0 2 5 4 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 3 5 7 . 7 2 ^ v 0 4 5 7 . 2 . 9 2 . 5 8 1 1 . 7 2 3 . 1 5 3 . 5 1 0 6 5 8 . 3 . 2 4 9 . 5 8 4 7 . 0 - . 3 9 . 4 4 5 . 8 7 6 . 9 8 4 7 . 5 . 8 7 0 0 2 7 . 8 4 2 . 7 9 7 . 5 6 2 . 3 . 19 3 . 0 1 u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L V/C ug/L WV . u ^ ^ \ ^ L ug/bv,^ u g / L \ u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L 60 - 320 X recovery Ki • 115 X recovery « denotes duplicate Injection XRSD exceeds 20X. V denotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. m ^ ^ Cites recovery excursion (includes need for 8!'>A). pSii^..ote8 blank is belov IDL given. 1 3 Page X of IL Run Log f o r Sample r e s u l t 2 . 0 9 5 . 8 2 . 0 1 1 3 1 0 8 P a s s 2 . 0 1 0 5 7 . 7 2 9 3 . 0 9 . 0 4 9 3 . 5 1 1 4 P a s s 2 . 0 Nu.7 2 3 ^ 1 5 3 . 5 ^ 1 0 6 9 7 . 2 P a s s 9 5 . 8 9 4 . 0 P a s s 2 . 0 8 3 . 9 5 . 8 7 8 7 . 1 6 . 9 8 8 1 . 1 9 5 . 0 P a s s 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 7 . 8 4 2 . 7 9 7 . 5 1 0 4 P a s s 3 0 . 1 u g / L X u g / L y. y. u g / L y. u g / L y. u g / L y. y. u g / L u g / L u g / L s u g / L u ^ y. \ y. y. u g / L y. u g / L y. u g / L y. y. u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L u g / L y. y. Soil IDL Soil CRDL ir.ss I n s t r u m e n t F l a c U_ uI uT iZ B3 • uI . \ K . X u _ _w B _ il _w u _ u _ • Example 1 F a c t o r 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 \ 1 . 0 ^ I s e O l / 0 \ 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g J t o r iK? ro I n j e c t i o n T i m e 2 0 0 8 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 4 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 5 2 0 4 1 2 0 4 6 2 0 5 2 2 0 5 7 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 8 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 2 1 2 9 2 1 3 5 2 1 4 0 2 1 4 6 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 6 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 7 2 2 1 3 " ^ ^ 1 8 2 2 ^ 2 2 2 9 2 2 3 4 2 2 4 0 2 2 4 5 2 2 5 1 2 2 5 6 2 3 0 2 2 3 0 7 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 7 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 6 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 5 150.0 ug/g 75 - 224 X B denotes value betveen VA. and CKDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given. K denotes Interference. Value belov 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution van (IK denotes blank is above D a t e 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 ' ^ / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 > ^ / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 > ^ 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 ^ v 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 \ . 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 0 6 / 0 1 / 9 5 recovery • DL or post spike < 40X. run for the cycle. IDL but beluv CRDL gi vi-n. 09:58/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/0129|^rev 303208 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for ^ ^\) Data f i l e : J0601A.PRN • Jyc Lab ID/Client ID 81 CCV-/ ^ 82 CCB/ 83 PBW13497^ 84 PBW13497A 85 LCSW13497 / 86 LCSW13497A 87 XGUOOl/HWOOOl 88 XGU0O1A/HWOO01A 89 XGU0O2/HWO1O1 90 XGUOO2A/HWO101A , i 91 XGUO03S/HW0OO1S M T Digestate result 49.2 .04 .29 61.5 3.75 2.83 21.9 92 XGUOfl3CA/MW00016 i t « C i 93 C C V ^ 94 C C B - ^ 95 XGUO04D/HWO001D 96 XGU004DA/HWO001D 48.8 -.05 2.83 97 XGU0O5AHWO001i>'l ^,. „ 12.9 98 XGUOO5A^nWO001/P3'^^'' ^ 99 XGU006/irW01Ol?AM<,NU^ii-'* .00 XGU006A/^W010iA\ .01 XGU0O7S/MV/0001S f^cjth 21.4 .02 XCU007CA/WW00016 Zrt-tttt: .a^XGU008D/MW0001D . « • GU0O8DA/t1W0001D -Ob wCV ^ .06 CCB :7 .07 XHHOOl/RBGWOO .08 XHHOOIA/RBGWOOA .09 XHH002/MW0005 \y^9- .10 XHH002A/HW0005Ai .11 XHH003/MW0004 .12 XHH003A/HW0004A .13 XHH005/XBCW00 3^^5^ .14 XHH005A/K^GW00A4» .15 XHH006/^0005 Iii 4^1/- .16 XHH006A/^0005Aio .17 CCV 7 .18 CCB Y .19 XHH007/^0004 1) .20 XHH007A/^0004A C) Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Vater CRDL 10.0 ug/L LCSV £>0.0 ug/L 60 Post digest, spike 20.0 ug/L 85 .28 48.0 .01 6. 16 17.7 2. 12 11.5 34.7 48.9 -.35 1.9 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L - 120 X recovery - 115 X recovery Sample result 98.4 Pass Pass 86.0 103 77.2 3.75 78.5 2.83 82.7 21.9 76.2 97.6 Pass 2.83 82.3 12.9 77.1 11.4 78.2 21.4 75.2 2.0 81.7 96.0 Pass 6. 16 83.9 17.7 73.2 2. 12 78.8 11.5 84.0 34.7 77.4 97.8 Pass 2.0 86.8 y. y. y. % ug/L y. ug/L % ug/L y. y. ug/L % ug/L y. ug/L % ug/L y. ug/L y. y. ug/L y. ug/L y. ug/L y. ug/L y. ug/L y. y. ug/L y. Soil IDL Soil CkDl. iris Flag o B_ _w B_ _w e i~ _^ • ft » u_ _w B_ _w » B_ _w » • U_ Sample Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g Injectiory Time 2341 2346 2350 2355 0001 0006 0011 0016 0021 0026 0031 0036 0041 0046 0050 0055 0100 0105 0110 0115 0120 0125 0130 0135 0140 0145 0149 0154 0159 0204 0209 0214 0219 0223 0228 0233 0238 0243 0248 0253 150.0 ug/g 75 - 224 X Date 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 recovery MU denotes run not used. H denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. V^enotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. ^ ^ ^ -ites recovery excursion (includes need for ESA). AS^^ Jtes blank is belov IDL given. ^ 3 age ^ of _\_ B deootes value betveen IDL and CkDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given, t denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. (IK denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. 09:58/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 171 303209 PACiVNO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for ^ P|) Data file: J06O1A.PRN Cyc Lab ID/Client IDi 121 XHHOO9/HWO0O3 \ -^ 122 XHHO09A/HWO0O3A1 "*^ 123 XHHOlO/^ill^OOOS ^ 124 XHH010A/KV0003A^ 125 cc^ j r 126 C C B ^ Digestate result 1.59 ug/L 14.7 ug/L 47.7 ug/L -. 1 ug/L Sample result 2.0 ug/L Sample Flag Factor U_ 1.0 70.6 14.7 66.3 95.4 Pass ug/L y. X W 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Injection Time Date 0258 06/02/95 0303 06/02/95 0307 06/02/95 0312 06/02/95 0317 06/02/95 0322 06/02/95 t^7 SO I2fi S5 129^S;25 130 131 SlOO^ 132 ICV 133 ICB 134 CRA 135 CCV 136 CCB 137 PBW13497 138 PBW13497A 139 LCSW13497 140 LCSW13497A 141 XGU0O1/HW0001 142 XGU001A/HW0001A 14^XGU002/HW0101 l ^ B GU002A/nW0101A 1 4 ^ A G U 0 0 3 S / H W 0 0 0 1 S 146 XGU003SA/MW0001S 147 CCV 148 CCB 149 XGU004D/HW0001D 150 XGU004DA/HW0001D 151 XGU005/HW0001 152 XGU005A/HW0001A 153 XGU006/HW0101 154 XGU006A/HW0101A 155 XGU007S/HW0001S 156 XGU007SA/MW0001S 157 XGU008D/MW0001D 158 XGU008DA/MW0001D 159 CCV 160 CCB 0 ug/L 0 ug/L 21.7 ug/L 60.6 ug/L 106 ug/L 59.1 ug/L .81 ug/L 5.32 ug/L 46.4 ug/L .98 ug/L 2.71 ug/L 5 & K 8 ug/L 07 >>g/L -1.0 ug/L 7.29 ug/L 48.1 ug/L .33 ug/L -.97 ug/L -1.93 ug/L -1.72 ug/L 8.03 ug/L -1.52 ug/L 49.2 ug/L -.21 ug/L ^ ^ 0 2.0 2.0 21.7 60.6 106 98.5 Pass 53.2 92.8 Pass OK 37.2 98. 1 47.3 2.0 39.0 2.0 29.9 ug/L U. ug/L u' ug/L _ ug/L _ ug/L _ X _ X ~ X X E X _ y* - ' ug/L U. X E. ug/L U X E. 29 ug/L B. 34.x. */• E" 9 6 . 2 Pass 2 . 0 3 9 . 0 2 . 0 2 5 . 9 2 . 0 31. 1 ug> X ug/L X ug/L X U_ E_ U_ E_ 8.03 ug/L B_ E_ U_ E 2 2 . 8 2.0 17.9 9 8 . 4 Pass X u g / L X X Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Vater CKDL 10.0 ug/L LCSV (4.0 ug/L 60 - 120 X recovery Post digest, spike 20.0 ug/L 8.'i • 115 X recovery 111 denotes run not used. 11 denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. V ^ ^ o t e s post spike recovery ia acceptable but requires flag. ^ ^ ^ tes recovery excursion (includes need for Hi'i). A ^ ^ j t e s blank is belov )DL given. 3 3 age _)L o^ ^ Soil IDL Soil CKDL LCSS 1 . 0 0328 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0334 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 3 3 9 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 3 4 5 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0350 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0355 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0401 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0406 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0411 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0417 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0422 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0428 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 4 3 3 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0438 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0444 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0449 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0455 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0500 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0506 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0512 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0517 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 5 2 3 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 5 2 8 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0533 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0539 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 . 1 . 0 0545 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 0550 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 l . ^ V 0 5 5 6 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 » ^ 1 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 06^7 0 6 / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 6 1 3 ^ ^ / 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0618 0 6 ^ 0 2 / 9 5 1.0 0 6 2 4 0 6 / 0 : 1.0 0629 06/02> 0.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g 150.0 ug/g 75 - 224 X recovery B denotes value betveen IDL and CB)L. U denotes not detected above IDL given, t denotes Interference. Value belov • DL or post spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. (IK denotes blank i s above IDL but belov CKDL given. 09:58/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 303210 PACI-I/NO Data file: J0612A.PRN Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for Pb -yc: i 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lab 3D/Client 3D SO . Digestate resuJ t SampJe ilampje 3nJHc:tdc)n resuJt Flag Factor Time Date S3 ^ S25 / S50 S100 ' ICV 2- ICB 8 CRA 9 CCV 10 CCB 13 7.27.7.77. 12 XGUO05 1> 14 7.77777. 15OXGU0O5 ^ -U. V7.7.'/:/:/. 1 7 7.77.7.7.7. / f J£l 7.7:/.7.7.7. JLiP W) 7.7:/.7.2'/. P.(A 7.7./.7.7./. 21 7.7.7.7.7.7. :jf^7./.7.7.'/. i ^ F J U 0 0 6 "t> 24 '/.7.ZZZ7 2\^ 77.7.7.7.7. 2i, 7.7.7.7.7.7. 27 XHH002 T" 2ft •/.7.7.7.7.7. 29 7.7.7.227. :^(^ 27.7.7.7.2 31 XHH005 :i> 2 c? 3 2 CCV C? 3 3 CCB ? :^4 7Z7.7.27 H5 XZZZ2Z :^f. 7.7.7.7.22 37 XHH005 :-i£l Z Z 2 Z 2 2 H9 Z2ZZZZ ^ ' ' 4 0 ZZZZZZ ^ ^ / J 2.0 ug/L 3.0 ug/L (.0.0 ug/L 20.0 ug/L 115 i recovery Hater IW. Hater CRDL LCilV (•0.0 ug/L m Pdrt digest, spike 20.0 ug/1. (ih • till denotes run not used. I^^k'itps duplicate injection XkSD exceedR 201. i ^ j ^ .fs p(it:l Rpike recovery is acceptable hut requires flag. « flenutes recovery excursicin (includes need for II;;A), Aid; denotes blank is belov IDL given. age 1 of 2 0 0 24.6 50. 1 92.8 59.0 .21 5.41 50.7 .6 18.8 33.5 32.3 35.4 35.7 48. 1 . 5 59. 1 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L • 120 X recovery 2.0 2.0 24.6 50. 1 92.8 98.3 Pass 180 101 Pass 18.8 33.5 32.3 35.4 35.7 96.2 P B B B 59. 1 Soil : ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L X X X ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L X ug/L IDL Soil CkDl. Lcsi; U_ U_ Nil 4_ NU 4-_ NU Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 4_ Nil NU Nil 4 NU NU NU 4_ mJ ,NU NU 4_ NU NU NU 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 4. 0 4. 0 4. 0 4.0 4. 0 4. 0 3.0 4. 0 4. 0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.4 ug/g 0.(i ug/g [01.0 ug/g 4! 1702 1707 1712 1717 1721 1726 1731 1736 1741 1746 37h3 1754 3 7h8 1801 3 803 3ft0r. 3ft0U 3ft32 Iftlh 3ft3ft lft;>2 1825 3 827 3 830 3 833 1836 3ft3ft 3 843 3 844 1847 1850 1855 1^)00 1903 3^)05 1908 3912 1S)3 5 3937 1 - ]4(. X 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 0f./3 2/9h 06/12/95 0r./3 2/9i. 06/12/95 0r./12/9r. 0f./3 2/?Jh 0f./3 2/^}h 0r./3 2/9S 0r./3 7./^Jh 0f./3 2/9ri 0V./3 2/?»h 06/12/95 0r./3 2/9ri 0f./3 2/^)h 0f./3 2/S)h 06/12/95 0r./3 2/^»i. 0f./12/'jr. 0C/3 2/^)ri 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/3 2/'.)r. 06/12/9h 06/32/95 06/12/95 0£"./3 2/^)5 06/32/95 0r./3 2/9ti recov»Ty H denotes value betveen 11)1. and CkDl.. U denotes not detected above )D1. given. K denotes interfeience. Value lielov • DL or pcist spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vhs run for thr cycle. CiK denotes blank is above IDL but belov CkDl. given. ^ ^ 080173 08:33/06-13-95 GF42 _ ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 3'D32Tl' PACl-:/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J for Pb Data file: J0612A.PRN Sample Injecticm Flag Factor Time Date 4_ 4.0 1920 06/12/95 1.0 1923 06/12/95 1.0 1927 06/12/95 C^yc 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 ^ 4f. 4 / 4ft 45> ri0 i.3 t.2 l.H f)4 51. !.£. ti7 hft r/.> Lab D D / C l i e n t 3D XHHOIO Cb CCV<*^ C C B ( ^ D i g e s t a t e resu3 t 2 7 . 1 ug/L 4 7 . 6 ug/L .96 ug/L Sample r e s u l t 2 7 . 1 ug/L 95. 2 X Pass £,0 ji £i J £.4 £.^ £>£. £.7 i.ft £.9 7 0 7 3 7 2 7 3 74 7^. 7£. 7 7 7ft 7 9 £(0 •iater IDI. Hater CkDl. LCSH I'dKt digest, spike kl^lenoteB run not used. ^ ^ lies duplicate injertion XRSD exceeds 201. w l ^ . a t r B post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. • denotes recovery excursion (includes need for HilA). ^kSS denotes blank is belciv IDL given. ^aae 2 of 2 2.0 ug/1. 3.0 ug/L (.0.0 ug/l 20.0 ug/L 8 0 • fi'.. • 120 1 recovery 115 X recovery Soil IDL Soil CkDl, LCSS 0.4 ug/g 0.(i ug/g 101.0 ug/g 45 - 14fi 1 recovery h U K 4 QK denoteF value betveen ]DL and CRDL, denotes not detected above IDl. given. denotes interference. Value belov • DI. or post spike < denotes autoiatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. denotes blank is sbove IDL but belov CkDL given. 0 3 0 1 7 4 401. 5:33/06-13-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 303212 PACIi/MO Hotals Department Run Log for Instrument J for $e Data files JO602B.PRM Cyc Lab ID/Client 3D 1 S® ^ 2 S5 3 S25 • 4 S3@ 5 SlOO 6 ICV/ 7 ICB / 8 CRA ^ 9 CCV / 10 CCB 11 PDWIO^O?' / Digestate result © ug/L 0 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 23.4 55. 0 119 63.5 \tj9s <>/gh>" 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 « 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 PBWl3497J£f»^^* PBW13497A 10, 3 LCSWi3497 52. 9 LCSW13497A XGU001/HW0001 XGUO01A/HW0OO1A XGU002/HW0101 XGUO02A/HWOieiA XGU0e35/HWO0015 XGU®03aA/MW0®^i-S- iai-i<* -.28 ug/L 6.35 ug/L 49.8 ug/L -.05 ug/L —5i 24—tt^/L ug/L ug/L -.88 ug/L -.7 ug/L 8.15 ug/L CCV.^ CCB " ^ <GU®04D/HW0001D XGU004DA/MW0001D XGU005^W0001 D XGUO05Ai^W0O01A >) XGU006/;i^0101 3) XGU006A/M/0101A -^ XGU007S/HW0001S^/il XGU008D/HW0001D XGUOO8DA/HW0001D CCV ^ CCB 3 XHH001/RBGW00 XHH001A/RBGW00A XHH002/HW0005 XHHO02A/HW00O5A XHH0O3/HW0004 51.0 ug/L 1.59 ug/L -.46 ug/L -.7 ug/L -1.75 ug/L 5-tttD- 9.67 ug/L -.79 ug/L 51.4 ug/L 1.08 ug/L 1.1 ug/L -1.98 ug/L -4.5 ug/L Sample result 2.0 ug/L 2. 0 23.4 55.0 119 106 Pass 127 99.6 Pass -Fsr^rfr— ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L X X X Fail 68. 1 92.9 2.0 81. 1 2.® 76. 1 X X X ug/L X ug/L X 91.5 102 Pass 2.0 81. 1 2.0 77.0 2.0 77.2 X X ug/L X ug/L X ug/L X 84.0 2.0 76.3 103 Pass 2.0 88. 7 2.0 80.7 -4. 5 X ug/L X X ug/L X ug/L X ug/L Flag U_ U •M 4J W U W 8. 15 ug/L U U 9.67 ug/L U W Sample Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.® 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1. 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Injection Time Date 1625 06/02/95 1630 06/02/95 1636 06/02/95 1641 06/02/95 1647 06/02/95 1652 06/02/95 1658 06/02/95 1703 06/02/95 1708 06/02/95 1714 ©6/02/95 1719 ©6/02/95 1724 06/02/95 1730 06/02/95 1735 06/02/95 1741 06/02/95 1746 06/02/95 1752 06/02/95 1757 06/02/95 1803 06/02/95 1808 06/02/95 1814 06/02/95 1819 ©6/02/95 1825 06/02/95 1830 ©6/©2/95 1836 06/©2/95 1841 06/©2/95 1847 06/02/95 1853 06/02/95 1858 06/02/95 1904 06/02/95 1909 06/02/95 1915 06/02/95 1921 06/02/95 1926 06/02/95 1932 06/02/95 1937 06/02/95 1943 06/02/95 1948 06/02/95 1954 06/02/95 2000 06/02/95 2.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L («.0 ug/L 60 • 10.0 ug/L 65 • 120 1 recovery • 115 X recovery Vater IIH. Vater CKDL LCSV Post digest, spike denotes run not used. denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. denotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. >otes recovery excursion (includes need for BSA). notes blank is belov IDL given. Page _1_ of X ' ^ Soil IDL Soil CKDL LCSS S.4 ug/g 1.0 ug/g 73.5 ug/g 37 - 116 X recovery B denotes value betveen IDL and CBDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given. K denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoiatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. UK denotes blank is above IDL but belov CkDL given. 10:01/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev n o n - j ^ er 303213 PACl£/NO H e t a l s D e p a r t m e n t Run Log f o r I n s t r u m w n t J f o r ^ ^ ^ D a t a f i l e : J0602B.PRN • ::yr. L.Bb ID/Client 3D 41 XHHOO3A/MWO0O4A ^ 42 XHHOOS^BGWOO 3> 43 XHHOO5A/i(BGW00AD 44 XHHO06/I1WOOO5 J) 45 XHHOO6A/^e0O5A D 46 C C V ^ 47 CCB y 48 XHH0O7/^O004 D 49 XHHO07A/^WOO04A ^ 50 XHHO07^.KW0004 p 51 XHHOO9/HW00O3 52 XHHOO9A/HW0003A 53 XHH01O/irtf00O3 3) 54 XHH010A/JfWO0O3A D 55 ccvr 56 CCB i ^ • ^ SO 58^~^SLi0 59 S 2 b \ ^ 60 S50 ^ \ ^ 61 S100 ^\,^^ 62 ICV ^ \ . ^ ^ C B ^ \ ^ W^^ ^ 6?^^CV 66 CCB 67 PBW13497 68 PBW13497A 69 LCSW13497 70 LCSW13497A 71 XGU001/HW0001 72 XGU001A/HW0001A 73 XGU002/HW0101 74 XGU002A/HW0101A 75 XGU003S/MW0001S 76 XGU003SA/MW0001S 77 CCV 78 CCB 79 XGU004D/MW0001D 80 XGU004DA/MW0001D Vater IDL 2.0 ug/L Hater CKDL 5.0 ug/L l£Sy (A.tt ug/L 60 Post digest, spike 10.0 ug/L 65 Digestate resi .7 -.54 52.9 .4 -3.5 5.06 -5.2 -4.33 52.7 1.54 0 0 21.8 61.2 108 65.4 .67 .11.8 ^ ^ r>K .24 57. 1 .41 .67 43.9 47.3 -. 37 .76 lilt ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L sUg/L c r ^ ^v ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L - 120 X recovery • 115 X rwovery ^ ^ 1 Sample result 57.0 2.0 106 2.0 72.5 106 Pass -3.5 56.3 5.06 -5.2 28.3 -4.33 42.4 105 Pass 2.0 2.0 21.8 61.2 108 109 Pass 236 93.8 Pass Pass 133 " x ^ . 1 16fe\_ 2.0^ 153 2.0 148 43.9 149 94.6 Pass 2.0 153 X ug/L X ug/L X X ug/L X ug/L ug/L X ug/L X X ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L X X X X X X ^-Hg/L X \ ug/L X ug/L X X ug/L X Soil IDL Soil CKDL LCSS Flag _W U_ uT _W EI _M E_ E _ E_ _W U_ U_ • ~y • iJ W " " ^ Iw^ • u_ -W Sample 1 Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 \ ^ 1.0 ^ ^ 1.0^ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 ug/g 1.0 ug/g Injection Time 2005 2011 2016 2022 2027 2033 2038 2044 2049 2055 2100 2106 2111 2117 2122 2128 2134 2138 2143 2148 2153 2158 2202 2207 2212 2217 2222 2227 2232 2237 2242 2247 2252 2257 2302 v2307 2 M 2 23ir 2322 2327 73.5 ug/g 2/ - lift X Date 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95 06/02/95. "^/02/95 06>«^95 06/02>S5 recovery NU denotes run not used. H denotJ-s duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. V Jgiotj-s pout spike recovery is acceptable hut ri-quires flag. ' ^ ^ p tes recovery excursion (includes need for HllA). •kS^^ tes blank is belov IDL given. B denotes value betveen IDL and CSDL. U denotes not detected above IDL given. K denotes interference. Value belov • DI. or post spike < 401. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. (IK denotes blank i s above IDL but belov CkDL given. age X ol A ^ 10:02/06-05-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev r\ n n -t *y O 303214 PACE/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument H for Se vyc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Data file: H0612A. Lab ID/Client ID SO . S5 ' S25 ' S50 SlOO * ICV 2^ ' ICB *Z- CRA CCV CCB XHH009(1/10) XHH009(1A/10)A CCV-7 CCB 7 PRN <- C Diges-tate result 1.58 4.36 26.1 47.0 96.0 61.0 .35 3.8 48.8 -.87 . 15 50.8 -.85 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Sam pie result 1.58 4.36 26.1 47.0 96.0 102 Pass 76.0 97.6 OK .8 93.4 102 OK ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L X X X ug/L X X Flag B B_ uI Sample Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Inji Time 1036 1041 1046 1051 1056 1101 1106 1111 1116 1121 1126 1131 1136 1141 action Date 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 06/12/95 H PAS^. Vater IDL 0.8 ug/L Soli IDL Vater CSDL 5.0 ug/L Soil CBDL LCSV 60.0 ug/L 60 - 120 X recovery LCSS Post digest, spike 10.0 ug/L 65 - 115 X recovery denotes run not used. B denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. U [enotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag. E otes recovery excursion (includes need for HSA). 4 .notes blank is belov IDL given. OK 0.2 ug/g 1.0 ug/g 91.0 ug/g 49 - 150 X recovery denotes value betveen IDL and CSDL deootes not detected above IDL given. denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run for the cycle. denotes blank is above IDL but belov CSDL given. Page _L of X 11:45/06-12-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev 303215 PACK/NO Hetals Department Run Log for Instrument J i o t r n J Data file: J0605A.PRN :yc l.ab ID/Client ID SIO 2 3 S50 4 SlOO 5 ICV 6 ICB 7 CRA 8 CCV 9 CCB 10 PBW13497 11 PBW13497 12 LCSW13497 13 LCSW13497A 14 XGUOOl/HWOOOl 15 XGUOOIA/HWOOOIA 16 XGU002/HW01O1 17 XGU002A/HWO1O1A 18 XGU002^HWO101A 19 XGU003S/HW00O1S 20 xcuooasA/wwaaaAS 21 CCV '^Y»^ 2 2 CCB y^///y^CZi Digestate result O 24.8 47.6 0 61. 1 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Sample result 2.0 ug/L Sample Flag Factor -.27 ug/L 8.94 ug/L 4^>2.,^^ ug/L -.48^^*gL/L 1.41 ug 17.5 ug/L 61.3 ug/L 1.25 ug/L .6 ug/L 13.1 ug/L 40.2 ug/L 55.3 ug/L -.65 ug/L U U U U H 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ^.0 1. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Injection Time Date 1057 06/05/95 1102 06/05/95 1107 06/05/95 1112 06/05/95 1117 06/05/95 1121 06/05/95 1126 06/05/95 1131 06/05/95 1136 06/05/95 1141 06/05/95 1146 06/05/95 1151 06/05/95 1156 06/05/95 1201 06/05/95 1206 06/05/95 1211 06/05/95 1216 06/05/95 2 06/05/95 1227'**«^05/95 1232 0 6 > O ^ 9 5 1237 06/05/ 1242 06/05/95 2^-^25 26 S50 ' 27 SlOO 28 ICV 1 29 ICB / 30 CRA / 31 CCV / 32 CCB / 33 PBW13497 J 34 PBW13497A 35 LCSW13497 / 36 LCSW13497A 37 XGUOOl/HWOOOl 38 XGUOOlA/nWOOOlA 39 XGU002/HW0101 40 XGUOO2A/HW01O1A -.17 ug/L 9.89 ug/L 27.4 ug/L 39.6 ug/L 95.6 ug/L 62.5 ug/L -.03 ug/L 7.89 ug/L 54.9 ug/L -.54 ug/L -1.08 ug/L 61.9 ug/L 1.31 ug/L -.62 ug/L 2.0 ug/L 9.89 ug/L 27.4 ug/L 39.6 95.6 104 Pass 78.9 110 Pass Pass 87. 5 103 89.5 2.0 63. 1 2.0 73.6 ug/L ug/L X X X X X X ug/L X ug/L X U_ 1.0 1246 06/05/95 B_ 1.0 1251 06/05/95 1.0 1256 06/05/95 1.0 1301 06/05/95 1.0 1306 06/05/95 1.0 1310 06/05/95 1.0 1315 06/05/95 1.0 1320 06/05/95 1.0 1325 06/05/95 1.0 1330 06/05/95 1.0 1335 06/05/95 1.0 1340 06/05/95 1.0 1345 06/05/95 1.0 1350 06/05/95 U_ 1.0 1355 06/05/95 _W 1.0 1400 06/05/95 U_ 1.0 1405 06/05/95 W 1.0 1410 06/05/95 2.0 ug/L 10.0 ug/L (4.0 ug/L 80 - 120 X recovery 20.0 ug/L 65 - 115 X recovery Vater IDL Vater CSDL LCSV Post digest, spike denotes run not used. denotes duplicate injection XRSD exceeds 20X. [enotes post spike recovery is acceptable but requires flag, -ites recovery excursion (includes need for HilA). A ^ ^ ites blank is belov IDL given. NU H V ^ e n 'age 1 of 2 Soil IDL Soil m L LCSS 0.4 ug/g 2.0 ug/g r/.l ug/g 39 116 X recovery B denotes value betveen IDL and CSDL. U denotes not detected above IDL givm. E denotes interference. Value belov - DL or post spike < 40X. 4 denotes autoaatic 1:4 dilution vas run ior the cycle. UK denotes blank is above IDL but belov CRDL given. 07:49/06-06-95 GF42 ETC/GS 02/01/94 rev n o n i '7Q 303216 HLA DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW SUMMARY Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis Case Number: 95053 Project Number: 29872 10.3 Site: Island Chemical Company - RI Contractor Lab: Pace Incorporated, New Orleans Validator: Kirsten Meier QC Reviewer: ^ ? > A X > ^ ~^ ^ A A ^ ^ Validation Date: Review Date: July 10, 1995 1 / n / 9 j - Sample Matrix: Water Analytical Method: SW 846, Method 8270, Pyridine only Sample Designations: RBGWOO MWOlOl MW0005 MW0003 MW0004 MWOOOl Data for the above samples are: [ ] Acceptable for use [ ] Acceptable for use as qualified [x] Unacceptable for use Is action required by the Project Manager? Yes No[x] Comments: The investigative samples were validated for Pyridine only in accordance with the "USEPA CLP National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review", February 1994. bru_clec.l 1 12;')1'W4 1530 Form BNA l.l 303217 Cas« Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29r72 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemicai Company - Rl DATA COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST [x] Included, no problems [*] Included, problems [O] Not included [NA] Not applicable Quality Control Summary X Case Narrative * Surrogate Recovery Summary * MS/MSD Summary X Reagent Blank Summary _x GC/MS Instrument Performance Summary Sample Data X Chain of Custody Forms * Holding Times X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts NA TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Initial Calibration Data X Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports * Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Continuing Calibration Data * Calibration Summary X Standards Quantitation Reports * Standards Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms * Internal Standards Summary Instrument Performance Data X DFTPP Mass Spectra X Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram X DFTPP Mass Listings bna elec.l I 12291994 1530 303218 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Reagent Blank Data X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports J * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts NA TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Data * Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms Laboratory Control Sample X Organic Analysis Data Sheets X Quantitation Reports * Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms X Mass Spectra Printouts NA TIC Mass Spectra Library Searches Comments: For the instrument B the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms showed peak areas from the scan 380 and higher, while the compound of interest. Pyridine, appears at aproximately scan 260. A visual comparison of data for Pyridine on that instrument was not possible. bna_clcc. 1 1 12391994 1530 303219 Gas.; Number: 95053 ProjeclNumber: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Ch=mical Company - Rl SPECIFIC COMMENTS REGARDING ANALYSES Chain Of Custody Were samples properly preserved and received in good condition? Yes[x] No Were custody transfers correctly and completely documented? Yes[x] No Comments: None Holding Times Were sample extractions performed within holding times? Yes No[x] Were sample analyses performed within holding times? Yes[x] No Comments: Due to low surrogate recoveries the investigative sample MW0003 was re-extracted on 5-22-95, 11 days since sampling. The results for this sample were reported from the original extract, therefore qualification of data was not necessary. Instrument Tuning Did the instrument performance checks meet acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Were samples analyzed within the 12-hour period following an acceptable performance check? Yes[x] No Comments: None bna_cicc.l I 12291994 1530 303220 Case Number: 95033 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Oicmical Company - Ri Initial Calibration Did the laboratory meet the method requirements regarding the minimum number of calibration standards for an acceptable initial calibration? . Yes[x] No Did the initial calibration curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent relative standard deviation (%RSD)? Yes[x] No Did the initial calibration meet the minimum relative response factor (RRF) criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. The initial calibration QC criteria were met for Pyridine. As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument B do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered or affected the quantitation of the target analyte Pyridine, cannot be evaluated. The concentrations of the initial and continuing standards are listed in the header as twice as high as the concentrations used in the quantitation section of the data. The injection volume is not clearly defined, but appears, that the same amount of 1.0 ul was used for standards and samples. Since no detections of Pyridine were reported, no qualification of data is necessary. Continuing Calibration Did the continuing calibrafion curves meet the linearity criteria for maximum percent difference (%D)? Yes No[x] Did the continuing calibration meet the minimum RRF criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. The continuing calibration on 5-24-95, Instrument H, shows a percent difference for Pyridine of 39.39%, exceeding the limit of 25%. However, this calibration check was not used for the reporting of sample data, therefore, qualification of data was not necessary. As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument B do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered or affected the quantitation of the target analyte Pyridine cannot be evaluated. bna_ciec.i I 12291994 1330 5 >-v iEt|rm BNA 303221 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - Ri Surrogate Recoveries Were the surrogate spike recoveries within acceptance limits? Yes No[x] If the spike recoveries were unacceptable, were the samples reanalyzed? Yes[x] No Comments: The investigative sample MW0003 has very low surrogate recoveries (2-7%) for the acid fraction. In the re-extract the acid surrogates are again low (2-3%). Pyridine is a basic compound, surrogate recoveries for the basic fraction were within QC limits, and qualification of data was not necessary. Matrix Spikes Were matrix spike analyses performed at the correct frequency and on a sample matrix representative of the samples in the sample delivery group (SDG)? Yes[x] No Were the matrix spike recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) within acceptance criteria? Yes[x] No Comments: The matrix spikes were performed with a 8270 mixture, including Pyridine. The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate showed no recoveries for Pyridine. The blank spike performed by the lab has acceptable recoveries. It appears, that the sample matrix has a strong affect on the detection of Pyridine, and it is questionable if any pyridine can be detected in the investigative samples using the 8270 method. Since none of the spike solution was recovered, the results for Pyridine in the investigative samples were qualified as unusable (R). Internal Standards Were the internal standard areas and retention times within the required limits? Yes[x] No If the internal standard requirements were not met, were the samples reanalyzed? Yesx[x] No NA Comments: The internal standard area for Perylene-dl2 in the standard STD50 of the initial calibration was 13593, below the requirement of 14802. Since the compound of interest. Pyridine, is not quantitated in that area, qualification of data was not necessary. bna_elec.l 1 12291994 1530 303222 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chimical Company - Rl Blank Analyses Were the appropriate number of blank analyses performed? Yes[x] No Were analytes detected in the blanks? Yes No[x] If analytes were detected in the blanks, were the same analytes detected in the associated investigative samples? Yes No NA[x] Did the sample results require qualification due to the presence of analytes in the associated blank samples? Yes No[x] Comments: This review is only based on the evaluation of Pyridine. The target analyte was not detected in the associated prep blanks and qualification of data was not necessary. Laboratory Control Samples Were laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses performed at the correct frequency? Yes[x] No Were the LCS recoveries within acceptable limits? Yes[x] No Comments: The lab performed a blank spike for pyridine, which had an acceptable recovery of 56%. No qualification of data. brw_clcc.l I 12291994 1530 7 Form BNA l.l 303223 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Sample Results Were target analytes reported in the investigative samples? Yes No[x] Were mass spectra provided for the target analytes detected in the investigative samples? Yes No NA[x] Were the mass spectra of acceptable quality and analytes correctly identified? Yes No NA[x] Were the quantitated results for target analytes calculated using the appropriate internal standards and were the relative retention times (RRTs) acceptable? Yes[x] No Comments: As stated previously, the chromatograms for instrument B do not show the scans for Pyridine and N-Nitrosodimethylamine, a visual evaluation was not possible. The possibility that the injection peak or other factors might have interfered with or affected the quantitation of the target analyte. Pyridine, cannot be evaluated. Therefore, the reported results for Pyridine in the investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J). Tentatively Identified Compounds Were tentatively identified compound (TIC) searches conducted for all sample analyses? Yes No NA[x] Were non-target peaks evaluated as required? Yes No Were the TIC mass spectra, searches, identifications, and quantitated results acceptable? Yes No Comments: Not applicable. bna_clcc. I 1 12291994 1530 8 Form BNA l.l 303224 Case Number: 95053 ProjeclNumber: 29872 10.3 Site ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Log Books Were sample preparations properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No NA Were sample analyses properly documented and performed in accordance with method protocols? Yes[x] No Comments: None bna clcc.l I 12291994 1530 303225 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - RI Calculation Checks Instrument Tuning m/z of 127, 2-2-95, 9:19, Instrument H Relative Abundance: Calculation not possible, only relative abundance was provided Initial Calibration Instr. B, Std 50, 3-23-95, D5-Phenol RRF: 14914 * 20 = 1.393 8567 x 25 %RSD: 0.099 *100% = 6.729 1.474 Continuing Calibration Std 50, 5-19-95, 9:52, Pyridine RRF: 9770 X 20 = 1.080 7235 X 25 %D: 1.054- 1.081 X 100 = -2.562 % 1.054 Surrogate Recovery MW0003, 2-Fluorophenol 505 X 20 = 1.184 7572 X 1.127 1.184 X 100 = 2.959 % recovery 40 bna_clcc. 11 12291994 1530 1 0 303226 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber; 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemical Company - Rl Matrix Spike Recovery No detections for Pyridine. Sample Results CRQL: Water sample Detected Result: No detection TIC Result Not required bna_clcc. I 1 12291994 1530 1 1 I-orm BNA !.l 3 03227 • Case Number: 95053 ProjeclNumber: 29872 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chemitiil Company - Rl HOLDING TIME QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Sample Identification Date Sampled Date Prepared Date Analyzed Prep. Holding Time Analysis Holding Time Qualifier U) o (.o to NJ 00 Comments: None biu_elcc. 11 12291994 1.530 12 lorm BNA !.l Cox- Number: 95053 PaycciNumbcr: 29872 10.3 Site H): Isliir^l Cl^mic-a] Ci>mpuny - KI INITIAL CALIBRATION QUAUFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument Analyte RF RSD Samples Affected Qualifier Comments: None o t j j to to biu_clec.ll 12291994 1530 l-orm BNA l.l Case Number: 9,5053 ProjectNumber: 29872 10.3 .Sile ID: Island Cl^mical Compwny - Rl CONTINUING CALIBRATION QUALIFICATION SUMMARY FORM Date/Time Instrument Analyte RF %D Samples Affected Qualifier to o LO to (jO o Comments: None bna_elec.l I 12291994 1530 Case Number: 95053 Prv>jeclNumber; 29872 10.3 .Site ID; Island Chemical Company - Rl BLANK SUMMARY FORM Blank ID j Analyte Blank Result (units) Action Level Associated Samples 1 o U) NJ U> M Comments: None bii.i_cle'j. 1 I 12291994 1530 15 Case Number: 95053 ProjectNumber: 29^2 10.3 Sile ID: Island Chsmical Company - Rl Summary and Conclusions The analytical results for Pyridine are not acceptable for use and were qualified as rejected (R). The reported results for Pyridine in the investigative samples were qualified as estimated (J) since a visual comparison of the peak acquisition was not possible. The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate showed no recoveries for Pyridine. It appears that the sample matrix has a strong affect on the detection of Pyridine, and it is questionable if any pyridine can be detected in the investigative samples using the 8270 method. Since none of the spike solution was recovered, the results for Pyridine in the investigative samples were qualified as unusable (R). Validator's Signature: AAA(AX flu't/ Validator's Initials: jd r\ Validation Date: '^-10- ^ 5 QC Reviewer's Signature: ^AtA<e,.«A ^ P'^yCy^At^ QC Reviewer's Inifials: 77/'/* Review Date: 1 / / f / ' ? J - bna elec.l 1 12291994 1530 Form BNA l.l 303232 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOOOl Description: NA Sample ID: XGU-001 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/09/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/18/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r P y r i d i n e Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection. Limit 10.0 X ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. VAUDATED Iteviewed By /^-"^ h ^ ' - — L L L L Cats ^ - \ o - 303233 161 James Otive West, Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEl.; 504-W9-0333 FAX: 504-46W)555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 201 WC>.qt » l * . A fE-*l VB' » ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOlOl Description: NA Sample ID: XGU-002 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/09/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/18/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration. ug/I (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 R ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit s t a t e d . Heviewed By Date 303234 161 James Drive West Suite 100 SI. Rose. LA 70O87 TEU 504-46M333 FAX: 50M69-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 202 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOOOl Description: MATRIX SPIKE Sample ID: XGU-003 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/09/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/19/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) MATRIX SPIKE Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 H ND-Not Detected a t or above the detection limit s t a t e d . Reviewed By Date VAUDATED . ^ - 1 0 - ^ ^ 303235 161 James Drive West. Suite 100 SI Rose. LA 70087 TEL 5(VM6»0333 FAX: 504-46M555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 203 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MWOOOl Description: MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Sample ID: XGU-004 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/09/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/19/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) MATRIX SPIKE DUPLCIATE Sample Blank ND ND Detection Limit 10.0 X ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. VALIDATED Reviewed By A - ^ ' A i ^ Hjyi-sU^ Date ^ - l O - ^ - g 303236 161 James Drive West Suite 100 SL Rose, LA 70087 TEU 504-46»O333 FAX; 504-46W)555 An Equal Opportunity Employer ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: RBGWOO Description; NA Sample ID: XHH-001 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/10/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/18/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 K ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. Reviewed By 0 ^ . . . . ^ VALIDATED A->Ai-^ IA'^-CJ ^ - l O ' i S 303237 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 St. Rose. LA 70087 TEL- 5O4.4«9-0333 FAX: 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 205 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0005 Description: NA Sample ID: XHH-002 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/10/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/18/95 Percent Moisture: NA Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 K ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. VALIDATED Reviewed By ' -^•^ Date . I ' l O - ' ^ ^ 303238 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL50M6M333 FAX: 50446M555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 206 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0004 Description: NA Sample ID: XHH-003 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/10/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15/95 Analyzed: 05/18/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 P a r a m e t e r Pyridine Concentration, ug/1 (ppb) Sample ND Blank ND Detection Limit 10.0 T^ ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. VALIDATED Reviewed By Date '" I A y A i 1 ' lO-lS 303239 161 James Drive West, Suite 100 SL Rose. LA 70087 TEL 504-46»K)333 FAX: 504-46W)555 An Equal Opportunity Employer OAT ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Results - Semivolatile Organics by Method 8270 Harding Lawson Associates Client ID: MW0003 Description: NA Sample ID: XHH-009 Matrix: Water Wet/Dry Basis: NA Collected: 05/10/95 Received: 05/12/95 Prepared: 05/15,22/95 Analyzed: 05/19,24/95 Percent Moisture: NA CAS No. 110-86-1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n , u g / 1 (ppb) P a r a m e t e r P y r i d i n e (DI) Sample ND Blank ND D e t e c t i o n Limit 10.0 'A ND-Not Detected at or above the detection limit stated. (DI) Sample required re-extraction (and/or re-analysis) due to surrogate recoveries outside the QC limits. Re-analysis yielded- similar results, indicating a sample matrix effect. The results reported are from the original analysis. Reviewed By Date VAUDATED iS 303240 161 James Drive West. Suite 100 St. Rose, LA 70087 TEL S04-46»<n33 FAX: 504-469-0555 An Equal Opportunity Employer 208 > -0m z D X o n 303241 APPENDIX G Drilling Logs 303242 01 sz o c CO cn m >. aj •" o y oj.S DC"' o> c •o OJ OC-g 2: Q. > Q. 0 — 0 • 0 0 Equipment CME 65 4 4 6 9 7 to 13 11 20 14 II 20 9 13 17 13 17 20 26 12 16 20 Q . 01 QJ Q. Split Spoon Elevation Not Measured Date 1/27/95 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- A-K CONCRETE LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 5/4), soft, wet LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 5/6). soft, moist GRAYISH BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) {2.5Y 5/2), loose, wet OLIVE YELLOW SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 6/6), soft, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2,5Y 5/6), loose, moist, medium dense at approximately 7' below ground surface OLIVE YELLOW CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2,5Y 6/6), medium dense, moist LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 6/4), soft, moist OLIVE YELLOW SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 6/6), loose, moist LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SP) (2.5Y 6/3). loose, moist OLIVE YELLOW CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2.5Y 6/6), soft, moist OLIVE BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SP) (2.5Y 4/4), loose, moist OLIVE YELLOW CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2.5Y 6/6). soft, moist OLIVE YELLOW SILTY CLAY (CL) {2.5Y 6/6), firm, moist-dry OLIVE YELLOW SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 6/6), loose, moist Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 Nortti Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-627-4505 Log of Boring SB-Cl ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 303243 OHAWN JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 DATE 4/27/95 REVISED D«TE o c CD 5 ^ cr> g TD > Q. 5 10 12 13 10 12 12 22 10 g 12 II 10 12 14 13 16 22 22 o o Equipment CME 65 Split Spoon E l e v a t i o n Not Measured D a t e 1/19/95 DARK GRAYISH BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (10YR 4/2), soft, moist, dark red mottling OLIVE GRAY SILTY CLAY (CL) (5Y 4/2), firm, moist PALE OLIVE CLAYEY SAND (SC) (5Y 6/3), loose, moist GREENISH GRAY CLAY (CH) (5BG 4/1), firm, moist OLIVE CLAYEY SAND (SC) (5Y 5/3), medium dense, moist GRAYISH GREEN SANDY CLAY (CL) (5G 5/2), firm, moist, calicfie visible from approx 15.5-16.0. brown mottling GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (56Y 5/t), loose, dry, wet at approx. 21.5-22.0 GREENISH GRAY SANDY SILT (ML) (5G 5/2). firm, moist, brown mottling End of Boring at 25' H a r d i n g L a w s o n A s s o c i a t e s Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street ~ Philadelphia, PA 19106 " 215-627-4505 JGY 29872.06.1 Log of Boring SB-D2 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 303244 REVISED 0»T 4/27/95 01 c o c CO ^^ irt m o " QJ .S CC — CD c • o 01 It > Q. /—I — O TD O 18 24 23 17 19 16 19 13 15 17 13 11 20 20 22 Equipment CME 65 Split Spoon Elevation Not Measured D a t e '/20/95 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- CO ^ VERY DARK GRAY BROWN SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (2.5Y 3/2), loose, dry VERY DARK GRAYISH BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 3/2), soft, dry DARK GRAYISH BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 4/2). soft, dry, sand appears to be caliche, red brown mottling, noted beginning 4 - 6 ' interval. WHITE SANDY SILT (ML) {5Y 8/1), soft, dry, appears to be caliche GRAY GRAVEL (GP) (5Y 5/1), medium dense, dry. appears to be limestone. OLIVE SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (5Y 4/3), medium dense, dry OLIVE SANDY SILT (ML) (5Y 5/4), firm, dry GRAYISH GREEN CLAY (CL) (5G 4/2), firm, moist, caliche at approx. 16.5' DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5BG 4/1). medium dense, dry. wet at approximately 20-21', End of Boring at 21' H a r d i n g L a w s o n A s s o c i a t e s Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-627-4505 DRAWN JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06. Log of Boring SB-D3 ICC St. Croi;<, U.S. Virgin Islands 303245 DATE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE OJ .c o .c tn o m 5 5 5 7 8 11 12 8 12 13 20 10 13 le 16 9 9 16 20 15 19 19 19 23 23 29 30 18 22 26 > Ji DC — 6 16 16 16 17 19 20 14 •g ^ Fqiiipmpnt CME 65 (0 ^ <^ Split Spoon 0) S o . ' ^ • H . Q. e FlPN/atinn Not treasured f i a t p 1/19/95 Si CL O i^ ."S > CL -o Q (^ o - O ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1- If 'n* -1 4 ^ i^ -i^ 8 - ^ i 9-j t o - • 1 1 - ; • 1 2 - ' 1 3 - . 1 4 - 1 5 - - • le-j.. 17- . 18- : 19- . 21-£/ 2 2 - ^ O/i 1^: ^ LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (2.5Y V ^ « 5/3)), loose, dry '0 , , , T y LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y / / 5/3), firm, dry 1 T / LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y / / 5/6), firm, dry i 1 ^ ^ ' LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2,5Y . • 5/4), loose to medium dense, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 5/4). medium dense, dry 7 7 LIGHT OLIVE BROWN CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2.5Y / / 5/3). medium dense, dry, wet between 22-23' A ' ' DARK OLIVE GRAY SANDY SILT (ML) (5Y 3/2), "^^ \ OLIVE UROWN LLAYtY bANU IbU) 12.bY 4/J), medium dense, moist Eno of Boring at 24' Hardlna Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-627-4505 Log of Boring SB-El ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 303246 DRAWN JGY jiIiB .'-.UMBER 29872.06.1 DATE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE —V7— 0) JO. o CD m Si S3 o -^ DC — CD C TD OJ > CL o—' 17 17 22 16 23 27 23 13 20 17 15 20 10 12 14 17 10 14 7 9 10 14 22 23 20 20 22 o TD O Equipment ^^E 65 CL OJ Q OJ CL Split Spoon Elevation Not Measured Date 1/23/95 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-^ 8 9H 10 II 12 13-1 14 15-1 16 17 18 19H 20 21-1 22 23 24-1 nr.O LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (2.5Y 5/3). loose, dry DARK GRAYISH BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 4/2). soft, dry OLIVE SILTY SAND (SM) (5Y 4/4), medium-dense, dry, fine to medium gravel and caliche noted from 6'-8'. OLIVE YELLOW SANDY GRAVEL (GM) (5Y 6/6), medium dense, dry OLIVE YELLOW SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 6/6). medium dense, dry, caliche noted throughout spoon. FINE BLACK LIMESTONE GRAVEL (5Y 2,5/1) noted throughout spoon LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 5/4). firm, damp, slightly plastic clay beginning approx. 15.5-16.0' t)elow ground surface: greenish gray mottling (5G 5/1) LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 5/4). firm, moist, slightly plastic, greenisfi gray mottling (5G 5/1), throughout spoon. LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SAND (SW) (2.5Y 5/4). loose, wet ;nd of Boring at 24' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19108 215-627-4505 Log of Boring SB-F1 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands FIGURE 303247 DRAWN JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 APPROVED DATE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE QJ JZ o ^ 0) E DO CC — O) c TD <0 QJ > a o — 14 15 18 19 2 5 16 16 16 16 2 4 13 3 6 3 8 3 4 14 14 10 10 15 9 10 25 19 13 2 4 2 0 o TD O Equipment ^ME 65 Split Spoon QJ £ Q. Q. E Elevation Not Measured Q cn Date '/24/95 ;.o, A ojrv LIGHT GRAY SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 7/2). dry, soft, caliche visible LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 5/3), firm, dry, caliche, twigs, organics present LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 5/6), medium dense, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2,5Y 5/4), medium dense, dry OLIVE YELLOW SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 6/8), medium dense, dry OLIVE GRAY SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (5Y 4/2), dense, dry. spoon impacts probably fracturing weathered limestone (rock) GREENISH GRAY SANDY SILT (ML) (5GY 5/1), soft, dry YELLOWISH BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (10YR 5/4), soft, dry, greenish gray mottling (56Y 5/1) increase m silt and moist from 18-20 feet GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5GY 5/1). medium dense, moist. wet at approx. 22 feet. End of Boring at 22' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA i9ioe 215-627-4505 DRAWN JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 Log of Boring SB-F2 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 303248 DATE 4/28/95 REVISED D4TE o c o ai'i CD C T3 rt) 0) > a o — 10 17 16 17 10 17 19 24 12 11 13 9 20 20 o TD O Equipment CME 65 Split Spoon Elevation Not Measured Date 1/24/95 Q A %i'%} DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (tOY 3/3), dry, fine-medium gravel, noted 0-1' ' DARK GRAYISH BROWN CLAYEY SILT (ML) (ICY 4/2), firm, dry, caliche visible OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CH) (2.5Y 4/3), firm, dry DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY CLAY (CH) (5GY 4/1), soft, dry DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY CLAY (CH) (5GY 4/1), soft, moist from 8 feet VERY DARK GRAY SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (5Y 3/1), medium-dense, moist DARK GREENISH GRAY CLAYEY SAND (SC) (5G 4/1), medium-dense, moist fine gravel throughout recovery (10%) Aproximately 25% fine gravel 13' below ground surface GREENISH GRAY SILTY CLAY (CH) (5BG 5/1), firm, moist GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5BG 5/1), medium-dense, moist GREENISH GRAY GRAVELLY SILTY SAND (SM) (5BG 5/1). medium-dense, wet at approximately End of Boring at 22' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA I9I06 215-627-4505 Log of Boring SB-F3 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 303249 J6Y JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 D«TE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE > Tl T) m z g X 303250 APPENDIX H Well Completion Forms • 303251 Top of Casing Elev. 31-36 PROTECTIVE CASING GROUND SURFACE PVC CASING CONCRETE - GROUT BENTOf^ITE SEAL GRAVEL PACK WELL SCREEN BOTTOM CAP •o- »-".-p .-o •. .••©•. .-© -. » • ' . • » .'•o •: > • • . • » ."-o •; 9.^0 '•©• ^:'9 i . - o • » - " . • * . " • « • ' - o •. .-o •: .'•o •. » - • . • • » i o c 3 m 4 5 7 10 5 8 10 15 6 13 6 9 12 17 5 7 6 8 6 7 10 11 9 9 II II 10 11 11 13 16 14 12 21 17 15 8 9 10 15 8 7 10 031 OJ.iz CC—- 0) It > Q. o — Equipment CME 65 20 22 24 23 22 22 20 20 22 6.4 1.7 1129 1542 492 454 21.6 9.7 138.5 255 611 14.1 o TD O Split Spoon Elevation -Q-'^' Date 1/31/95 OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 4/4). soft, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 5/4), soft, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2.5Y 5/4), loose, moist LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 5/6), loose, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2,5Y 5/6), soft, moist LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 5/6). loose, dry, w/ tine gravel below approx. 17' BGS OLIVE YELLOW SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 6/6), firm, moist YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (10Y 5/6), soft, moist, w/ 35% fine sand DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5GY 4/1), soft, wet, w/ 15% silt End of 3oring at 35' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19108 215-627-4505 JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 Log of Boring and Well Completion SB-Bl / MW-1 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 3 03252 DATE 7/26/95 REVISED UAIt Top of Casinc Eiev, 31.33 PROTECTIVE CASING GROUND SURFACE PVC CASING CONCRETE - GROUT BENTONITE SEAL WELL SCREEN GRAVEL PACK BOTTOM CAP n • • • . • I P if • o - B : . - ] 0 i .'-0 •; » • • . • ' « » . • • ' « • o - i OJ x: o c 03 ^^ (O m 10 10 10 5 7 9 12 6 9 10 12 6 9 9 12 11 20 15 20 c (t: OJ > Q. 22 22 22 22 22 20 o TD O Equipment '"^E 65 Split Spoon Elevation -^8.45 Date 1/31/95 DARK OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2.5Y 3/3), loose, dry GRAYISH BROWN SILTY GRAVEL (GM) (2,5Y 5/2), loose, dry OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2,5Y 4/3), soft, dry LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (2.5Y 5/3), soft, dry DARK GREENISH GRAY SANDY CLAY (CL) (5BG 4/1), soft, moist DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY CLAY (CL) (5BG 4/1), soft, moist DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5BG 4/1), loose, moist DARK GREENISH GRAY SANDY SILT (ML) (5BG 4/1), soft, moist, DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5BG 4/1), loose, moist End of Boring at 29' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-627-4505 DRAWN JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 Log of Boring and Well Completion SB-C2 / MW-3 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 3 0 3 2 5 3 DATE 7/26/95 REVISED DATE Top of Casing Elev. 28.63 PROTECTIVE CASING GROUND SURFACE PVC CASING CONCRETE - GROUT BENTONITE SEAL GRAVEL PACK WELL SCREEN 30TT0M CAP ft o - ••.-IB • • - » • • - • > ! ••.•:• I 01 o 3 o 10 12 10 9 6 6 6 7 3 3 4 4 4 4 8 9 5 8 10 12 5 5 7 5 II 10 1! 10 14 14 8 10 IB 15 II 20 15 19 14 20 CD C TD (D Q) 11 > Q. o — 24 24 20 o O Equipment CME 65 Split Spoon Elevation 26.84 Date 1/25/95 LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5YR 5/4), soft, dry OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 4/3), soft, dry: caliche noted throughout spoon, approximately (10-25%) OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) {2,5Y 4/3), soft, dry. less caliche than previous spoon, approximately (10%). OLIVE SILTY CLAY (CL) (5Y 5/4), soft, moist from approx. 10', no caliche noted. DARK GREENISH GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) (5GY 4/1). loose, moist OLIVE SILTY CLAY (CL) (5Y 5/4), soft, moist OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 4/4), firm, moist, fine gravel > 10% OLIVE BROWN CLAYEY GRAVEL (GO (2,5Y 4/4), medium dense, moist OLIVE BROWN CLAYEY SAND (SC) (2,5Y 4/4), medium dense, moist End of Boring at 24' H a r d i n g L a w s o n A s s o c i a t e s Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-627-4505 Log of Boring and Well Completion SB-DI / MW-4 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 3 0 3 2 5 4 JSW 29872.06.1 DATE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE Top of Casing FiPv 28.83 p n n T r r T T\f r |-^nU 1 L u i 1 V t CASING GROUND SURFACE r W L L A D I N D cnt irni—rr L U I N U n t 1 t — r p n i IT U n U U 1 n r f l T D t ITTT DC IN 1 UlNl 1 C SEAL 1-1 P I 1 WbLL SCREEN BOTTOM CAP J°L 9 M - O - J9L A A !?<= » • • . • » • • . • I B ; • • • » : . • • » • ; - • • •'••J ^^* ».V1^ i;.iB •.'.» . ' • • ' . ' » . ' . • • « * ; . • » .'-o-; >.'.''(i >:.l> . - • • !»••.• w i?. •^i gi ; • • • : e-.B « > • " • » P-'.TB •o- . " • • • . ! » • • . • • ( . ' • « • . • • • • • .'•0 •. i 1 £l4 - * - — ^ ^ — — ~ ^ ^ — ^ —, ^ — ^ 0) _c CO J o m : =^. S 5 ' i ' 6 3i-C ^ ft 8 ft 20 ft iSii 10 i^'i 9 i;'i 8 •-.••» 7 • • • « • * • ' • " * '•m 9 ^i? 8 i'.-'o 7 ^:^ ^ • « iJi'' 5 »-.-i> ^ -••••• 5 » . o ;: ^ p.-.--fl -^ ; • « • : ^'.-V i*. 5 i^i 7 i^i 8 ^ • . 8 * • • . * i^yi II •^'i'' 14 •^i? 13 ^'i? 12 B-.-fl i '0 ^ ,4 1 " 1 q 22! 9 m 8 SS; 7 ai; 10 «V; 11 ' % 13 v'V.'-V. •••.•'••'.• 1 1 K& 15 sa 21 KS 18 JW 8 SS 1' I'.-;-.*;'; 17 Ss; 1'' ;ii';' 8 i/i'-'V 17 ;§; 16 % Hi ./•W; • ^ ^ > • ^1 o -^ o <-> oJ.S oc — 14 13 20 20 22 20 22 20 17 14 18 20 c XD 03 0) C C - 2 : Q. -^ J ^ 5 OJ > Q. TD a o - o ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 \ J t - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10- 11- i^J 13- 14-! 16-- 17-i 1 18- 19- OCi CKJ — 2 1 - 22— 2 3 - 2 4 - 2 5 - 2 6 - 2 7 - 2 8 - ( Fqnipmpnt CME 65 ^ Split Spoon E F l p v a t i n n 26.40 p a t P 2/1/95 cn y / / y LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL) W^AA/ '^-^^ ^^^'' ^°''' '^°'^' I ' I ' I ' ^ ^ WHTTP TAI Tri-IF (9 R-i fi/1) hArrl rtrw A A / . OLIVE YELLOW SANDY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y 6/6), ! / / / / firm, dry. r ~~~~ YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) (ICY 5/4), J soft, dry 1 i 1 1 F ' " " " LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2,5Y 6/4), loose, dry. : / / / LIGHT OLIVE BROWN SILTY CLAY (CL) (2.5Y / / / . 5/4), soft, dry 10% fine sand, greenish gray - Y / y ^ y mottling (5G 5/1), from approx. 18' \/A/ \AA/ K/A/ ^AA/ AA/ AA k OLIVE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) (2,5Y 4/3), I . ' . ' . medium loose, moist, greenish gray mottling (56 • • . • . 5/1), throughout spoon. A \ ' \ . j . i . • OLIVE BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SP) (2.5Y 4/3), ! • •-.• •• medium loose, moist. 20% silt. • ' « - • ' • • ' • • . • * • •. • • « ' • ' • • ' •'•'•'• « •. • • - - ^ — — ' End of Boring at 28' Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services = : = r . = 131 North Third Street _ S S T * r Philadelphia, PA 19106 • • • " " • 215-627-4505 Log of Boring and Well Completion SB-D4 / MW-5 ICC St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 3 0 3 2 5 5 JGY JOB NUMBER 29872.06.1 DATE 4/28/95 REVISED DATE > T T rr z c X APPENDIX I Water Level Measurement Forms 303257 Harding Lr^n^on Aa»oci«-t»i UWTER LEVEL DATA S-EET , PROJECT: > " ' - < - - _ ; • " ' • • / '1^'^'A rA / J 03 CATE: O S ' A : / 9 ^ S-ETT ' CF I ^-r C / l : i.J^' 1 : : NLr<SR ! /wui/-/ : ! Al i^'3 : : /^\y'H- : : /^^\/-5 : : FA : : ^5. • ; . * '" ' -, "^ * • •* *' . • • " . : DEPTH TO T i r E : WAilLH : :l.st F^CDING : • - ' ' - • '' ' . . - ' 2 '-': -^' ''.'A-'- -; ^ i '^^.ec : A,'A^'^^\ A: A' V A . - ^ ' ; • : : : ; > -V':'i ' / z . ^ - - - : - ^ v ; ' • A \ '^'- ' - 5 ' • • , . ' • ' / • * - ; ; [ • ' -• I ' - ' • i •• ' ^ ! : ' 1 - • - • : " • • - • ; : . : ; : ; : ; : • : : : : : DZ^7-: TO : I:EP7H TO : CCTTa^-n'S FATU>. : '.^TER • SECTICTJz' 2r,i F£-Dlr^G tS.-d F^ADING : ' ' • • • - • ''-''•' 1 - - • ^ ^ ' • • • : ' ^ ^ ' : ^ - . ; ' ^ - . : ' . • - • • C - V - ^ ^ , ' ^ ! / " ; • O y ) , ' ^ - ' J V ' ' - ' - •'-•,•-••"•••• / I , - , - ' C ' - • • ' • \ . ' . ' . ' ' • " , • • • • • ^ /' : : ' - ' ' " • • - • • ' - - i ' • : • • ' ' • ' { " : • : • ' . ' • • ' V — •••'-. \ . • . : . ' •"• , • '.• ' • : - Z I - : : : " : : : : : : : •; ; 303258 : : : Harding L*wvon Ax^^ximitt WATcjR LEVEL DATA S-EET INSTT^LrE>JT/raca_ « : L A ' S A i ' y - f A A f ^ C C //.\i/-^r.: 1 ^ ' ^ ^ K ^ T ^ A r t p x ' ^ ^ .^".'.•F'iXr./Cp/j-, ^, <-c/0^'<^ PROJ JOB :u-^.._M2A^AAL r>^TE: 05/iAif A / '7' S-€ET i CF T i r E CtPTH TO WATER 1st READING :J--r 1.-. , u - i RE-DIN HEP Tri TO VATEP. .,-d F£.ADIN3 A//1/-/ lA'P^^ "AlAAf nm A/A ^ V/rF ^^-^ />^,/y: /^i4/4 6 ? ^ . 01 '•.US'i %A^' M'"^ 0 t&L Crf'' • 1 1 ^ hWA O^A'/A '^'^A^Q 'iM, 'A] AAI Ocr^ Off, UFf.^- m^ /AW-5 o r 01 ;99.7/. y "^AA/A A/A 0 ffff \off-^i AAA PA nr^AA \3A^i^' 3(^iT/^' VA ^ A •-tA QYA' \CAA P - ^ /?r/''^/ ; % A ^ '^hA-^ % AM r ^ IAAJ.. A-?- P ! ^ W f" k Ay -e AJ/u e j l ^ ^ ^ / •'-• nrw r-\ (^y ^\yFl r^.A^-^-^ ^ CA ^WA^:^j 72 r f- o 303259 Harding LaM<^«n A j ^ o d i r t e a WATER LEVEL DATA S-EET INSTi=!LrENT/riODeL « PROJECT: : f ^ < ^ ^ . Ulry, (J.tM.t Ni^rE: .JJ/r/'/'c'v /?.?<,-c-rA/Vc:-'.'.^77.~./ ' h / / ^ JOB r-LTISR: DATE: S-EET OS/ieAfr : UF' 1 : : NLTT-FR : ; Atv-/ ; /ti^-a ; ; /HM<-y ; ; A v i ' S "• \p-l *: IP-i, ^\ ': A Of ;'A?Ci^, ; ^fe/V^^ : "^f ^^ i / TirE : O^yZO ; D^5^' : c<iAO ; 0^c^5l? : 09.0^ ; 09-^f ; /x/^ iv^'^4 "^j 7^-^h ? £^ L^Tr^*' : • UEPTF. TO Wlirj-i : I s t READING : "ftm TIC 24. Jc^ ^ ; ^A A n ' : 33 .'?r"; W.^^ ; 3t..rr^ : a(/7,%"' ; ^ p-1 ; •:'2- . U v . t *L / • ,A •; t o t , : *r CEPTH TO : UA1 r..-! : 2nd RE^DlrsG : 3^6 R l J^AY ; .^^^sf"; ^^^^5^^^ ; %py' : X/^ /^ r ; DEPTH TO : UW1 t^r^ : 3rd F^ADING : AJr^ ; A//y ; A r/l : A/.^ ; A/Al ; A//^ ! ^^ci P-2 Pn A.- c-> Z^''^" • ccrrEi-vTrs bcLTicrj <^ffm Off,, m M 11 6* /f.t' \ 1 /9/o/>/ ^^j;c Offt^ 1J Off" !} 1 A7^.v D.^.. C'lf'^ II 0 r^^"^ /^/(^.•^' ! / »/ ' - ^' ^ T H/^V(' / VA^f'.i / ^ ^ fc-t?-.-^ # 1 303260 Harding L-awvon A j » o < j r t « x UiATER LEVEL DATA S-EET irSTT^LTENT/rtDCtL « : 0 ^ p A r g f ^ C e / ^ # / g JOB r.r^.: P ^ r P t M / A DATE: ^ y / V ^ 5 ^ &EET / CF / TirE UEPTrA TO WATER l.s.t READING T.-i RE-Dlr- 'JEPTri TO rd READING CCrrEfvTB SECTJCTJ ai/H*A ot^A^*i^ o^^y /nvAr/ MK Mi Mvu/t> 01 AS W\l rAn o NH % ± Ocn f ^ ' ^ , o ff- /?/• AI yVV-/ OS V^ .93. ir llJ^ v^ d If D ff y ) Cui M^-f 0%Ab 2 0 ;^^^ 2 M L L UAL 'M D, .m 0|PA': IzL 0"^ vlo. T b L l i / A/1 O^^y c ffa C ^ C'^- df/o^j'D %.n 2LJA Nn 0 ^ d (T Orr.fi if" ^^!Ut,^r^g^, " ^ ^ " ^ ^ w^«v6 i ^ ^»a^<atoc.»*^<i^ J ^ ? j « d ^ ' . ^ ^ ^ U L I T ^ »I 303261 > • 0 Tl m z D 303262 APPENDIX J Aerial Photographs 303263 \. 'M -^'^sfei^i^• T/^ 303268 U) o w vo to o u> •'•WSj--•-•- ^vsss!££n:gs<g^7i;^i^^g^3;^^^?^g^'^^^s:?^^ > Tl m g X 7; APPENDIX K Well Records 303277 o LO to -J 00 64"54' 17"48' 17"46' 17'44' 17"42' 17"40' 64'52' 64'50' 64"48' 64'46' 64"44' 64'42' 64'40' 64-38' 64'36' 3 MILE RADIUS 65'30' 0 1 2 4 MILES 0 1 2 3 4 KILOMETERS ->brc>. CARIBBEAN HEA CF:F^ to 2D 0 10 » 64"34' Harding Lawson Associates LOCATION OF ST. CROIX AREA GRIDS Engineering o n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia. PA 19106 ISUND CHEMICAL COMPANY 215-627-4505 ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISL^NDS HGURE DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 6/7/95 REVISED DATE 64'48' 17'44 Base from U.S. Geological Survey Frederiksted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE MILES KILOMETERS I Harding Lawson Associates Engineering ond i Environmental Services '3", North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY STCROIX. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRIDS DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED FILE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 3 0327 9 64'46' 17 44' Base from U.S. Geological Survey Christiansted. VI. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE 2 MILES J 2 KILOMETERS j Harding Lawson Associates > Engineering ond • Environmentol Services ; '3'. North Third Street ; Philadelphia. PA 19106 : 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRIDS ; DRAWN ; JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED FILE S-BASE DATE REVISED NO. • 7/18/95 303280 64'44' Sfi^Jn.-' 5S ^••A:'A:-AF4iAi Base from U.S. Geological Survey Cfiristiansted, V.I. 1.24,000, 1982 SCALE KILOMETERS 2 MILES ; H a r d i n g L a w s o n A s s o c i a t e s Engineering ond Environmental Services ; ' 3 : North Third Street ; Philodelphia, PA 19106 I 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISL7\ND CHEMICAL COMPANY STCROIX. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS FIGURE GIRD 10 ; DRAWN ; JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED FILE S-BASE DATE REVISED NO. 7 / 1 8 / 9 5 303281 64"50' 17"42 Base from U.S. Geological Survey Frederiksted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE MILES KILOMETERS I Harding Lawson Associates Engineering ond Environmental Sen/ices ' 3 ; North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAiND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRID 17 : DRAWN : JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE REVISED NO. 7/18/95 303282 64'48' ^and Sallys Fancy, '.(mi'-- ' ' '41 42 . "%\ 3 7 ^ a ^ • 5 6 ^ - N • ^ " ^ ' ^ ^ - ^ T . • ' $ 9 . -•60 17"42' Base from U.S. Geological Survey Frederiksted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE 2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS ; Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Environmental Services ; ' 3 : North Third Street ; Philadelphia. PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRID 18 : DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 303283 64'46' - (' ,'-' >'^'^«::^W:B;thIeh^rh.Oh^ork • : . / B \ fyJ^ -BMr < Qjllnr':' -Chfi \ ; •l.Hill X ' '7 -M-5ra^jc,^^Ajm^-: SITE ^ • 5 3 VCateHrment V .;:^ .v.. off 7 2 a - •U--- „ 'OO-Wt ... SpaiiiateTo 15-- ^ - ' v » ^ ^ ^ . : ^ ^ ^ 6 - . . M ' • - • • • • • • tO'-\ '•••AAA '\ yAl' F T Anna' r>4^ r'C:iii)4i£^iil ^ • • - - 7 3 ^ 40 42' U :' : A^?A^.^^ :. . V ^ ' r 43 i o — Alexander, HamiUoo • • ( - - " - ^' h v, ^ •' . - •• l i i ^ t : ^ " - - J ' ^ l * A 46 Base from U.S. Geological Survey Chiristiansted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE KILOMETERS 2 MILES I Harding Lawson Associates Engineering o n d '• E n v i r o n m e n t o l Services ; • 3 ' North Third Street ; Philadelphia. PA 19106 ; 2 1 5 - 6 2 7 - 4 5 0 5 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRID 19 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE REVISED NO. 7/18/95 303284 64'46' 17"44' 64'44' 17'42' ^iaml 2 ' Re oO •.":^^^-0 ^^- ^^>- lt.«<-o? ia: \ 2\m 22»'. ^ 4 • ! • J v -26 68) • ,23a,b .. - „ ^ - r » ^ g ^ ^ 1>42 ' ••:. 1 ^ '\\ Ah^^CA^. ^ "^^ Jer\^aJ3jn ani 5 .' V^ 'PrgtreeHill I g ^-T O ''"••\FU A ' ' • ' • \ • . \ • ^ ' - Base from U.S. Geological Survey Christiansted, V I . 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE MILES 2 KILOMETERS 3 0 3 2 8 5 j H a r d i n g L a w s o n A s s o c i a t e s Engineering ond i Environmental Services I '31 North Third Street I Philadelphia. PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE I S U N D CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRID 20 DRAWN J S W JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 64"52' 17'42' 64'50' 17"40' .: -rMAA) F V \:AAJW¥. i? ! • \ l 6 3 2 l . • V:. , , A ; \ i Q ; ^ § • • \F>FF A) " •-AA'-i Hope an(L-\ -.F. ^"'f •.. Carlton Land "' ? A. \/'^t %A - ^ f ^ Base from U.S. Geological Survey Frederiksted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE 2 KILOMETERS 2 MILES 303286 • Harding Lawson Associates I Engineering ond \ Environmentol Services ; •3: North Third Street ; Philadelphia. PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISL«\NDS 'CURE GRID 26 ; DRAWN : JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 64"50 17'42 64"48' ^> , V . ..', ^?U!ns eldJGreeh'^' : • 17'40' Base from U.S. Geological Survey Frederiksted, VI. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE 2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS 3 0 3 2 8 7 I Harding Lawson Associates Engineering ond i Environmental Services I '3". North Third Street ; Philadelphia. PA 19106 I 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE GRID 27 : DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 17"40' 64'46' Base from U.S. Geological Survey Chnstiansted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE 2 MILES 2 KILOMETERS j H a r d i n g Lawson Associates ' Engineering ond Environmental Services '31 North Third Street Philadelphia. PA 19106 215-627-4505 ; DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 3 0 3 2 8 8 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE J GRID 28 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE 7/18/95 REVISED NO. 64 •44' / B A 3 A E A N 17'40' Base from U.S. Geological Survey Cfiristiansted, V.I. 1:24,000, 1982 SCALE KILOMETERS 2 MILES 303289 • Harding Lawson Associates I Engineering and I Environmental Services I •3'; North Third Street ; Philadelphia, PA 19106 ; 215-627-4505 PRODUCTION WELLS WITHIN THREE MILES OF SITE ISLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY ST.CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLa.NDS RGURE GRID 29 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.13.2 APPROVED RLE S-BASE DATE; 7 / 1 8 / 9 5 REVISED NO. > t l -0 m z g X 303290 APPENDIX L Phase I Baseline Ecological Assessment 303291 Draft Technical Memorandum Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary Virgin island Chemical Site St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands Prepared for Island Chemical Company, Inc. 29872 15.1 Andrew J. Chartrand Staff Scientist Alan ]. Finio Senior Scientist August 14, 1995 Harding Lawson Associates ~= Engineering and Environmental Services 131 North Third Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 - (215) 627-4505 303292 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE 2 2.1 Location and Setting 2 2.2 VICHEM Site History 2 2.3 Site Structures 3 3.0 PHASE I BASELINE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FLNDINGS 4 3.1 General Environmental Conditions 4 3.2 Potential Sources of Site-Related Compounds 6 3.3 Pathw^ay for Potential Sources 6 3.4 Potential Ecological Receptors 7 4.0 EVALUATION OF FINDINGS 8 5.0 PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS 10 6.0 REFERENCES 11 TABLES 1 Summary of Site History 2 Summary of Environmental Sampling at Former Process Pit FIGURES 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Map 303293 \W0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 3:00pm Harding Lawson Associates i ATTACHMENTS A Environmental Resources Inventory B Historical Aerial Photograph Review C List of Endangered Species 303294 \WORK\29872\ECO\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE PATHWAYS ANALYSIS REPORT AND PHASE I BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Technical Memorandum presents the results of the Pathways Analysis and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment for the Virgin Island Chemical (VICHEM] site in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. A site location map is presented in Figure 1. This Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment was developed pursuant to the terms of the National Contingency Plan (NCP] and the Remedial Investigation 'Work Plan, Island Chemical Company, Inc., U.S. Virgin Islands (Work Plan), Harding Lawson Associates (HLA), dated August 5, 1994. Purpose and Scope The purpose of the Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary was to document current VICHEM site conditions and to identify potential ecological concerns on the VICHEM site. The scope of this investigation was limited to the area within the VICHEM site boundary as defined by the Work Plan and to areas outside of the VICHEM site buildings. The Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary included the following tasks: • Identify potential ecological stressor sources related to the VICHEM site. • Identify potential pathways for identified stressors to be transported to the environment within the VICHEM site. • Inventory environmental resources on the VICHEM site, including surface-water resources, habitats, species of concern, geology and hydrogeology, soils, topography, climate, and air quality. • Identify potential ecological exposure points and receptors within the VICHEM site. 303295 \WORK\29872\ECO\ICCTECH.REP August 14, 1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 2.0 VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE This section presents an overview of the VICHEM site and historical operations that occurred at the VICHEM sile. The historical information is based on a review of background data presented in the Work Plan and a review of a series of historical aerial photographs to identify changes in ecological conditions on the VICHEM site and adjacent areas. A detailed outline of the results of the historical aerial photograph review is presented in Attachment B. A summary of the VICHEM site history and ownership is presented in Table 1. 2.1 Location and Setting The VICHEM site occupies approximately 3 acres in south-central St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (Figure 1). The VICHEM site is located on Route 66, approximately 1,200 feet west of the intersection with Route 64. The property is located on Plot 13Q of Estate Bethlehem Middle Works at 17°42'35" north latitude, 64°47'26" west longitude. A map of the VICHEM site boundary for this investigation is presented in Figure 2. The VICHEM site is bordered to the northeast and southeast by River Gut, a stream with intermittent flow; to the west by open, undeveloped land; and to the south and southwest by Route 66. A concrete batch plant, and two automobile repair shops are located to the east of the VICHEM site, across River Gut. An asphalt plant and an engineering business are located to the north of the VICHEM site. 2.2 VICHEM Site History According to the Parcel Subdivision Map obtained from the Government of the Virgin Islands (GOVI), Charles H. Steffey became the owner of Parcel 13, of which the VICHEM site is a part, in Estate Bethlehem Middle Works on December 1, 1965. Sometime after that date, Charles H. Steffey subdivided Parcel 13 and the VICHEM site was designated as Plot 13Q. The VICHEM site is currently unoccupied and is owned by CHS Holding Corporation (CHS) with Charles H. Steffey as an officer of the company with signing authority. On May 1, 1969, CHS leased the VICHEM site to Houston Chemical Industries, Inc. (Houston). Caribe Chemical Co. Inc. (Caribe), a wholly owned subsidiary of Houston, operated the facility. In March 1972, Pierrel International S.A. acquired all of the shares of Caribe. Caribe's name was subsequently changed to Pierrel America, Inc. (Pierrel). On June 30, 1978, Pierrel assigned the ground lease to Cooper Laboratories (Cooper). Island Chemical Company (ICC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cooper, operated the facility. ICC was incorporated in Delaware on July 21, 1978. Enviro-Science, Inc. (ESI) (ESI, 1985) reported that prior to acquisition by Cooper, it is believed that the facility was used to manufacture phenacetin (a pharmaceutical component) and ethoxyquin (antioxidant, food additive, and antidegradation additive for rubber). Cooper used both toluene and pyridine in a process to perfect the conversion of quinine to quinidine (a cardiac depressant). 303296 \W0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 2 In 1979, Cooper assigned the lease to its subsidiary, ICC. On November 1, 1979, Cooper sold its stock in VICHEM to Berlex Laboratories, Inc. (Berlex). For approximately one year during Berlex's ownership of ICC, ICC attempted was made to develop a quinidine processing operation at the facility. The process that ICC sought to develop during the period of Berlex's ownership used toluene, but did not use pyridine. This operation, however, never progressed beyond the developmental stage. Early in 1982, ICC abandoned plans to use the VICHEM site and the plant was permanently closed by the end of 1982. On September 14, 1984, ICC sold its assets to Virgin Island Chemical Company (VICHEM). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a Preliminary Assessment and Removal Evaluation in January 1989. At that time, the VICHEM site was occupied by St. Croix Security Kennels and VIAG Fuels, Inc. (VIAG). According to EPA report (1989), the operator of,the kennel, Kate Wesp, was evidently living onsite. EPA reported that VIAG used some office space in the main building and stored ethanol in four of the facility's aboveground storage tanks (ASTs). Activities performed by EPA are discussed in the Preliminary /Assessment, Removal Evaluation and Funding Authorization Request for CERCIA Removal Action at the Virgin Island Chemical Company, Inc., Site, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands - ACTION MEMORANDUM (EPA, 1989). It is beheved that by this time VICHEM had relinquished its lease and that St. Croix Kennels and VIAG leased the property directly from CHS. A detailed history of the VICHEM site ownership is presented in the Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Island Chemical Company, Inc., U.S. Virgin Islands (Work Plan), Harding Lawson Associates (HLA), dated August 5, 1994. 2.3 Site Structures The current facility layout is shown in Figure 2. Major onsite structures and their historical use include the following: • Laboratory and Warehouse Building, \vhich housed the analytical laboratories. • Maintenance Building, which was reported to have housed two boilers, refrigeration units, air compressors, and a maintenance shop (ESI 1995). • AST farm, which included a total of 20 tanks at one time. Ten tanks are still present on concrete pads and 10 additional vacant concrete pads have been identified. • Loading Dock (former location of laboratory pit) • Concrete Storage Pad • A scale for weighing bulk materials • Reactor Area • Generator and Fire Pump Buildings • One 250,000-gallon fire water AST • Reduction/Oxidation Unit and Water Storage BuUding • Process Tower 303297 \\V0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 3 3.0 PATHWAYS ANALYSIS REPORT AND PHASE i BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The findings of the Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary, summarized below, are based on a review and analysis of the data presented in the Environmental Resources Inventory (ERI) (Attachment A), a visual field reconnaissance of the VICHEM site, and a limited review of previous environmental investigations related to the VICHEM site. 3.1 General Environnnental Conditions This section presents an overview of general environmental conditions identified at the VICHEM site. • As described in Section 2.0, the VICHEM site consists of approximately 3 acres. • Ecological resources identified on the VICHEM site by HLA are very limited: Approximately 50 percent (1.5 acres) of the VICHEM site is covered with buildings, concrete, paving, or other structures. Approximately 47 percent (1.4 acres) of the VICHEM site is dominated by barren land resulting from vegetation removal activities. Dense vegetation was identified in several locations offsite adjacent to the VICHEM site boundary. This dense offsite vegetation is apparent in. The remaining 3 percent (0.1 acres) of the VICHEM site is dominated by opportunistic shrub and grass species common to disturbed upland habitats. The vegetation identified ; onsite by HLA field personnel is dominated by tan tan [Leucaena glauca], opportunistic herbaceous weed species, and planted ornamentals, including a mature domestic mango tree [Mangifera indica). Wildlife species observed onsite include two species of lizards including ancles [Anolis acutus] and a gecko [Sphaerbdactylus spp.), one mammal (mongoose [Herpestes auropunctatus]), tadpoles of one amphibian species believed to be marine toad [Bufo marinus), six bird species including cattle egrets [Bubulcus ibis], bananaquits (Coereba flaveola), pearly-eyed thrashers [Margarops fuscatus), gray kingbirds [Twannus dominicensis), a red-tailed hawk [Buteo jamaicensis], and doves (species unknown), two insect types which included termites and mosquito larvae (species unknown), and one type of arachnid, an orb-weaving spider [Older Acarina, species unknown). No special wildlife observation techniques were employed for this phase of the project. No federal or Virgin Islands endangered plants or animals have been identified or reported in the vicinity of the VICHEM site and are not likely to maintain populations within or near the VICHEM site due to a lack of suitable habitat and the influences of local land uses (Attachment A, Section 4.0). 303298 \W0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 4 • No wetland habitats were identified on the VICHEM site. Wetlands were identified by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping adjacent to the VICHEM site associated with the River Gut stream channel. NWI mapping identifies the length of River Gut adjacent to the VICHEM site as PF03A wetlands (Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Evergreen Temporarily Flooded) (Attachment A, Section 2.4)(Figure A-2). River Gut is an intermittent stream located adjacent to the northeast and southeast of the VICHEM site. Intermittent flow in this stream channel is from the north and continues in a southerly direction to its terminus at the Caribbean Sea approximately 4,500 feet downstream from the VICHEM site (Attachment A, Section 2.2). Based on available data, the course of River Gut appears to have been altered significantly sometime between 1964 and 1971. The River Gut stream channel observed in a 1964 aerial photograph was approximately 300 feet further east towards Route 64 and had a more winding course than the existing channel does. The original course of River Gut traversed the properties now occupied by Charlie's Concrete, Fix-It-Right Transmission, King's Automotive, and Virgin Islands Paving. The River Gut channel, observed in a 1971 aerial photograph, had been mo\'ed to its existing pathway adjacent to the VICHEM site. The channel is straighter and appears to be wider than the channel observed in the 1964 photograph (Attachment B). The VICHEM site falls entirely within the 100-year floodplain of River,Gut as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Attachment A, Section 2.3)(Figure A-3). The watershed associated with the River Gut floodplain within and upstream of the VICHEM site has a total area of approximately 6 square miles (Attachment A, Section 2.6)(Figure A-4). In general, surface runoff on the VICHEM site flows across the site from the south and southwest toward the northeast and southeast to River Gut (Attachment A, Section 2.1)(Figure A-1). Stormwater flow across the VICHEM site resulting from an intense 4-hour rainstorm was between 6 inches and 2 feet deep. An earthen berm partially separates the runoff from the aboveground storage tank farm in the western part of the VICHEM site from the remainder of the site. On the western side of the berm, runoff drains from southwest to northeast and is captiued by two storm drain systems (Attachment A, Section 2.1)(Figure A-1). In general, surface drainage on the eastern portion of the VICHEM site is controlled by buildings, concrete paved areas, and two storm-water drainage systems that channel collected runoff to River Gut (Attachment A, Section 2.1)(Figure A-1). The VICHEM site does not have a secure site fence. Much of the fence depicted on site base maps from earlier investigations is missing or is in poor condition. 303299 \Vv'ORK\29872\ECO\lCCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 5 3.2 Potential Sources of Site-Related Compounds • It was reported that wastewater, spills (ESI 1987), and cooling water (EPA 1986) related to operations in the process area were channeled to an underground storage tank referred to as the "process pit" (Figure 2). The process pit is described in the Work Plan. A system of drains channeled materials to the process pit. The process pit was connected to the central storm drain system which discharges to River Gut. According to ESI, the process pit was filled with concrete in 1985. - Samples collected from the portion of the central drainage system associated with the process pit by ESI in 1985 identified material that may be related to the process pit discharge. Table 2 presents a summary of environmental sampling in the process pit and central storm drain area. The open drainage channels associated with the process pit area were observed to contain sediments. These channels were also observed to fill with water during storm events and in some places were observed to pond water for more than a week after the last reported rainfall. The observed area of ponded water was approximately 8 feet long by 2 feet wdde by 2 feet deep. Amphibian larvae (approximately 100 dark-colored tadpoles all less than three centimeters in length) and mosquito larvae were observed by HLA field persormel in the pooled water iti March 1995 and again in May 1995. • During the April 1995 reconnaissance of the VICHEM site, HLA field persormel observed drops of a petroleum-like substance leaking from the drain valve on the AST labeled "Tank 5." Approximately 1 square foot of stained soil was observed below the leak. HLA field personnel adjusted the valve and the dripping stopped. • 1995 HLA sampling results identified VOCs in near surface soils in the area of,the AST farm (Section 4.0 of the Data Summary Report) that may be related to petroleum storage in the ASTs. • During field activities, HI_A personnel identified a concrete pit located approximately 15 feet from the southeastern side of the laboratory and warehouse (Figure 2). Based on the design of this pit, it appears to be a settling tank similar to those used for septic systems. There is no evidence that VICHEM site-related substances may be associated with this concrete pit. 3.3 Pathway For Potential Sources Three pathways were identified for potential \"ICHEM site-related compounds to become available to the onsite ecological receptors identified in Section 3.4. These pathways are: 1) Direct contact by a receptor with the source. 2) Possible distribution of compounds associated with sediments or sods to other locations on the VICHEM site by stormwater (Section 3.1). 3) A possible pathway through ingestion of prey may'exist on the VICHEM site. Evidence of termites burrowing in the soil was observed by HLA field personnel in various locations on the VICHEM site (Attachment A, Section 3.0). Termites are near the beginning of the food chain and may serve as a pathway to higher trophic level species. 303300 \v/ORK\29872\ECO\lCCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 6 Based on a review of the analytical data for soil samples collected by HLA in 1995, it appears that the distribution of substances by storm water is not extensive across the VICHEM site. There was no indication in the 1995 sampling results that substances which may be present in storm drain sediments have been transported to other locations on the VICHEM site. Based on a review of the analytical data for soil samples collected by HL/\ in 1995, the limited area of potential site-related substances identified indicates that the pathway through ingestion of prey is not likely to be a route for transport of site-related substances at concentrations of ecological concern. 3.4 Potential Ecological Receptors The following potential ecological receptors of Site-related substances were identified: • Areas of vegetation in the AST area and growing in the sediments in the open storm drains in ii'ie Process Pit area may come into contact with VICHEM site-related substances from the sod, sediments and/or groundwater. Because vegetation removal activities occasionalh- take place to clear the site, this represents a minimal ecological risk. • Contaminated sods, if present, may be ingested or inhaled by wildlife on the VICHEM site. • Tadpoles and insect larve, observed in the water ponded in the open drains in the process pit area and transient wildlife, such as birds, which may drink from this ponded water, m.ay come into contact with site-related substances. In some locations the open drain channels near the process area have collected sediment which support herbaceous plant species which may be exposed to site-related substances if present in these sediments. 303301 \\VORK\29872\ECO\ICCTECH.REP August 14, 1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 4.0 EVALUATION OF FINDINGS Based on the findings of the Phase I Ecological Assessment the risk to potential ecological receptors on the VICHEM site is anticipated to be limited. Based upon the findings presented in Section 3.0, the following assumptions can be made about the ecological implications of the potential sources, potential pathways, and potential receptors: • As described in Section 3.3, three pathways were identified for potential ecological resources on the VICHEM site to be exposed to potential site-related substances. These pathways are: 1) Direct contact by a receptor with a source. 2) Sediments or soils could possibly be distributed to other locations on the VICHEM site by stormwater runoff. 3) Ingestion of prey species which may have direct contact with site-related substances in soils or sediments. • Under the conditions identified at the \^CHEM site, three of the four potential sources identified in Section 3.2 have possible exposure routes to ecological resources identified within the VICHEM site boundary. These potential sources are: 1) The open drainage channels of the process pit area. 2) Soils in the area of the ASTs with elevated VOC concentrations. 3) Stained soils associated with a discharge from the AST labeled "Tank 5". - There is no evideiice that VICHEM site-related substances are associated with the concrete pit identified in Figure 2. • Potential ecological receptors of possible site-related substances identified by HLA include: 1) If present, VICHEM site-related compounds from soil and/or groundwater may be received by vegetation on the VICHEM site. Because vegetation removal activities occasionally take place to clear the site, this represents a minimal ecological risk. 2) Contaminated soils, if present, may be ingested by animals such as termites and may pass through the food chain. Based on a review of the analytical data for soil samples collected by HIA in 1995, the limited area of potential site-related substances identified indicates that the pathway through ingestion of prey is not likely to be a route for transport of site-related substances at concentrations of ecological concern. 303302 \Vv'ORK\29872\ECO\icCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 8 3) Open drainage channels around the process area sometimes fill with water and may pass VICHEM site-related compounds to animals, such as the tadpoles, observed in the water or transient species such as birds which may drink the ponded water. In some locations the open drain channels near the process area have collected sediment which support herbaceous plant species which may be exposed to site-related substances if present in these sediments. Based on a review of environmental conditions on the VICHEM site it is assumed that the the storm drain system has been flushed several times since the samples collected by ESI in 1985. It is assumed that sediments, if any, present in the stormdrain system are deposits from the surounding soil. Based on a review of the analytical data for soil samples collected by HLA in 1995, the ecological risk associated with potential residual VICHEM site-related substances in open storm drains is assumed to be minimal. 303303 \\V0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 9 5.0 PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of the Pathways Analysis Report and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary presented in Section 3.0, the potential ecological risks within the Vichem site boundaries is assumed to be minimal. It is recomended that no further action related to ecological risk assessment is necessarv on the VICHEM site. 303304 \W0RK\29872\EC0\ICCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 10 6.0 REFERENCES Enviro-Science, Inc. 1985. Report Concerning Small Quantity Generator Status of Island Chemical, May 7. Enviro-Science, Inc. 1987. Attachment, Site Description for Island Chemical Company, St. CroLx, U.S. Virgin Islands, April 16. Harding Lawson Associates. 1994. Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Island Chemical Company, Inc., U.S. Virgin Islands, August 5. Miller, Jeff. 1995. Department of Planning and Natural Resources on St. Croix. Personal communication with Andrew J. Chartrand, Harding Lawson Associates, May 3. NUS Corporation, a Halliburton Company. 1991. Final Draft Site Inspection Report, Island Chemical Company/VI Chemical, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11. U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency. 1986. RCRA Enforcement, Berlex Laboratories, [a subsidiary of Island Chemical Co., Inc.), St. Croix, Virgin Islands, VID980651095, March 13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Preliminary Assessment, Removal Evaluation and Funding Authorization Request for a CERCIA Removal Action at the Virgin Island Chemical Company, Inc., Site, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands - ACTION MEMORANDUM, August 8. AJC/tg/ 303305 \wORK\29872\ECO\iCCTECH.REP August 14,1995 2:56pm Harding Lawson Associates 11 • > 03 r-m CO 303306 Table 1. Summary of Site History Virgin Island Chemical Site St. CroLx, U.S. Virgin Islands Date Events May 1, 1969 March 20, 1972 June 30, 1978 November 1, 1979 1980 through 1982 November 27, 1892 through February 1, 1983 May 17, 1983 September 14, 1984 09/17/84 through 10/28/84 June 5, tlirough August 7, 1985 June 14, tlirough July 19, 1985 September 9, 1985 December 5, 1985 February 19, 1986 March 12, 1986 March 13, 1986 June 2, 1986 through March 10, 1987 January 31, 1989 March 30, 1989 through April 30, 1991 September 17, through 19. 1989 February 28, 1991 December 11, 1991 Steffey leased sile to Houston Chemicals Houston assigned the lease to Caribe Chemicals, subsequently known as Pierrel Pierrel assigned the lease to Cooper Laboratories. ICC was incorporated July 21, 1978 and the lease was assigned to ICC b}' Cooper in 1979 Cooper sold its stock in ICC to Berlex Berlex uses the facility in attempt to perfect a quinidine process. By the end of 1982 the plant was permanently closed. ICC removes 26,748 gallons of toluene and 6,946 gallons of xylenes for disposal at Inland Chemical, Puerto Rico. Approximately 15,000 gallons of a water solution was removed from the cistern and disposed locally. GOVI inspection indicated no hazardous waste on site ICC sold its assets to Virgin Island Chemical Co. (VICHEM) ESI investigates soil conditions in the Loading Dock Area and .\ST Farm ESI investigates soU conditions in Drain Lines and Lab Pit area. Toluene affected soils are excavated and placed on trays in the dryer building for thermal treatment. Results of treatment are documented through periodic sampling. ESI collects sludge and Hquid samples from Lab Pit and Process Fit. Samples submitted to ICMI for various analyses USEPA collects samples from Dryer and Lab Pit for PPL analysis ICC disposes of 192 drums of waste at Chemical Waste Management in EmeUe, Alabama ESI collects samples from River Gut. Analyzed for metals, cyanide, phenols and VOCs. A few metals were detected ESI collects Hquid samples from nine ASTs for characterization by ICMI USEPA collects three additional samples from Gut, two from lab pit and one from northern onsite well. ESI obtains spUts. ESI prepares waste profiles for 67 drums. USEPA performs a Prehminary Assessment. At this time, the site was occupied by St. Croix Security Kennels and VIAG fuels. Inc. USEPA plans and performs waste removal activities. Final disposal of hazardous materials reportedly completed by 10/24/91 Hurricane Hugo strikes NUS collects groundwater, soil and sediment samples as part of the Prehminary Assessment'Site Investigation Draft P/VSI report issued by NUS \VVORK\29872\ECO\CHRONLGY.TAB HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES 303307 Table 2. Summary of Environmental Sampling Former Process Pit Virgin Island Chemical Site St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands .Sample Name Sample Date Matrix Collect by/ Analyzed by Laboratory Sample No. Parameters Analyzed Substances Detected' Pit-Duplicate 05/14/85 l,i(|uid ESI/ICMI Pit Sludge 06/14/85 Sludge ESI/ICMI Vl25-Sr':D5 02/28/91 Soil 42885 42886 & 42887- Composite l>it Sludge ()(i/l4/a5 "While Lump" IvSI/lCMI 428HH SI. Croix 07/19/85 Waler ESl/ICMl 44418 NUS/Coinpu nOL -CheiTi Not analyzed VOCs; Pest; PCBs; AECs; B/Ns; metals; CN; phenol tliikiiowii VOCs; Pest; PCBs; B/Ns; AECs; metals; CN; phenol VOCs; AECs; B/Ns; Pest; PCBs; metals Insufficient sample volume to analyze As(40); Cd(22.8); chloroform(220); Cr(592); Cu(327); CN(1.44); Pb(688); Hg(2.73); methylene chloride(125); Ni(134); phenol(9.01); loluene(l,560); Zn(3,594); benzene rnethanol'''(15,000'); benzyl acetate\l70,000'); chloromethylbenzene^(4,40o'); l-chloro-2- methylbenzene''^{40'); diphenyl methanone^(30,00o'); 9li-fluorene-9-one^(3,000'); 1,T- (oxybis (methylene)bis) benzene (4,000') No laboratory rej)ort provided lienzcne(0.04); Cd(0.003); Cr(0.027); Cu(0.15.3); CN(0.053); Pb(O.Oll); !lg(0.001); Ni(0.08); phenol(O.lGl); Ag(0.008); Tli(0.02a); tohicne(0.:i8); Zn(4,85); benzaldehyde^(3.0'); chloromethyl l)enzcne^(0.3'); benzene methanol'^(24'); phenyl acelate''"(26'); diphenyl methane'(0.4'); l-l'-{oxybis (methylene)bis l)etizene'''(0.4'); 2-Butanone(0.085'); xyIenes(0.08G'); 2-methylnaphthalene(0.63'); aceiiaplliene('); fluorene('); phenan I lirtme('); DNBP('); fluoranthenc('); pyrene('); BBP{I); B2EHP(2.2'); y- BIIC('); aldrin(0.012'); heptachlor epoxide(0.0048'); endosulfan 1(0.004'); dieldrin(0.004l'); 4,4'-DDT('); mellioxyclilor('); -clilordane(0.0035'); y- chlordane(0.006l'); Al(9,400); Sb(2B.c'); As(8'); Ba(48.0); Ca(51,200); Cr(57.6'); Co(13.8); Cu(367); Fe(183,000); Pb(466); Mg(4,740); Mn(925); Ni(47.8)); K('): Na(J); V('); Zn(l,500') OJ O U) w o c» Notes: ' Reported concentrations in p.ireiillieses. presented in parts per million (ppm). ' l-islimalc;!! i:onf:onlration ^ I'entalively identified compound B/.N Base/iieutnil exiraclable coin]K)und AKC Acid exlr.ictablc compound BTEX: li<;iizen(!, lolucne, ethylbenzene and xylc:rii:s PCI! Pdlyclilorinaled biphenyls Pest Pf:slicidc\s V()(; Volatile; organic; coinpouiid \wuRK\29872\t:(:(Ai'si'K()(:ss.TAii HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES 2] O c m CO 303309 m « » ^ 303310 \ » • • • / C ^ " - ^•" ylA^A''^A\A. •^'{tSrlA.dventure < . R'jtns- I ^-^>;:>7*^^='^-,.*-'?-.i"--—,• • r ^ - «Z>/ / /UT ' 1/'.^ \ •/•• _Ar.r.aber? SOU.^Cc:: USGS 7.5 .MInu'.a Cuod .Map; Christianatsd. V.;. FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPCSES OMLY ! • ' — I Harding Lav^son Associates Engineering and Environmental Services U l North Third Street Philodolphia, PA 19106 215-527-4505 DRAWN JOB NUMBER JSW 29872.13.2 SITE LOCATION MAP VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS APPROVED y\i£ S-BASE 303311 DATC 6/6/95 ncuRE 1 RC<1SED NO. ATTACHMENT A ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES INVENTORY 303313 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SURFACE WATER RESOURCES 2 2.1 Surface-Water Drainage 2 2.2 Storm-Water Drainage 2 2.3 Stream 2 2.4 Wetlands 2 2.5 Floodplains 3 2.6 Regional Watershed 3 3.0 HABITAT 4 4.0 SPECIES OF CONCERN 6 5.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 7 5.1 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology 7 5.2 VICHEM Site Geology and Hydrogeology 7 6.0 SOILS 8 7.0 TOPOGRAPHY 9 8.0 LAND USE 10 8.1 VICHEM Site 10 8.2 Zoning 10 ' 8.2.1' Coastal Zone Management 10 8.3 Surrounding Land Use 10 8.4 Surrounding Sites of Potential Environmental Concern 10 9.0 CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY 12 10.0 REFERENCES 13 FIGURES A-1 VICHEM Site Drainage Map A-2 National Wetlands Inventory Map A-3 100-Year Floodplain Map A-4 Regional Watershed Map A-5 Habitat Map A-6 Soils Map A-7 Topographic Map A-8 Land Use Zoning Map A-9 Coastal Zone Boundary Map \WORK\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 303314 ATTACHMENT A VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES INVENTORY 1.0 INTRODUCTION The inventory of environmental resources on the Virgin Island Chemical (VICHEM) site was developed to support and provide data for the Pathways Analysis and Phase I Baseline Risk Assessment Summary. The Environmental Resources Inventory (ERI) of the VICHEM site documented the following environmental resources: Surface-Water Resources (surface-water drainage, streams, floodplains, and watershed) Habitat Species of Concern Geology and Hydrogeology Soils Topography Land Use Climate and Air Quality The ERI presented in the following sections of this attachment utilized existing materials such as aerial photography, wetlands mapping, soils mapping, floodplain mapping, existing water resources data, topographic quadrangles, territorial and federal lists of species of potential concern, municipal zoning and tax maps, and municipal records. In addition to the literature review, HLA conducted a limited visual field reconnaissance of the VICHEM site in March 1995 to confirm and supplement the findings of the literature review. \VVOR10,29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 303315 2.0 SURFACE-WATER RESOURCES 2.1 Surface-Water Drainage The general surface-water flow direction across the VICHEM site is from southwest to northeast. Runoff which does not evaporate, percolate into the soU, or evapotranspirate from the vegetation, discharges to the River Gut stream channel (Section 2.3). As discussed in Section 2.2, a majority of the storm-water on the VICHEM site is captured by the storm-water drainage system and is channeled off-site to the southeast. An earthen berm approximately 2 feet high partially separates the aboveground storage tanks in the western part of the facility from the remainder of the VICHEM site (Photograph 3). On the western side of the berm, runoff drains from southwest to northeast. Two surface drainage erosion gullies were identified along the northeastern side of the VICHEM site. These erosion gullies drain storm water from the VICHEM site beneath the fence to the northeast. Surface drainage on the eastern portion of the VICHEM site is controlled by the buildings, concrete paved areas, and two storm drains that channel runoff to the River Gut along the southeastern VICHEM site boundary. River Gut drains to the Caribbean Sea, approximately 4,500 feet to the south. Figure A-1 presents general surface water flow directions across the VICHEM site. 2.2 Storm-Water Drainage As shown in Figure A-1, two storm drains are located on the VICHEM site: the central and southern storm drains. The central storm drain collects water from the concrete surface between the laboratory and maintenance buildings and from the process area between the maintenance and dryer buildings. Two storm-water inlets collect runoff from the concrete surface and the water then flows southeast towards the VICHEM site fence. In addition to the two inlets, water is believed to enter from the open drainage conduits around the process area, from the process pit area, and from a pit located in the central storm drain pathway, immediately to the southeast of the concrete surface. The southern storm drain is an open concrete-lined channel that runs along the southern wall of the Maintenance Building and the edge of the Reactor Area. Runoff from the water tank area enters this storm drain at the southern corner of the process area. Both storm drains discharge off-site to the southeast. Along the northern side of the VICHEM site fence, two surface erosion gullies were identified which carry water from the VICHEM site to the northeast. One is located near the northern corner of the VICHEM site and the other is at or near the location of the former lab drain. 2.3 Streams River Gut is an intermittent stream that is adjacent to the northeastern, eastern and southeastern boundaries of the VICHEM site. The River Gut channel adjacent to the VICHEM site varies in width from approximately 35 feet to 60 feet. River Gut merges with Bethlehem Gut approximately 800 feet southeast of the VICHEM site, before draining into the Caribbean Sea, approximately 4,500 feet to the south. \VVORK\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 303316 2.4 Wetlands No wetlands were identified on the VICHEM site. The area of the River Gut stream channel that borders the VICHEM site is designated by U.S. Fish and Wildlife (FWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping as PF03A (Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Evergreen Temporarily Flooded). PF03A wetlands are described as freshwater wetlands less than 20 acres and less than 2 meters deep at low- water; forested with woody vegetation 20 feet or taller; broad-leaved evergreen vegetation; and with floods most years for less than 2 weeks during the growing season, and usually dry by mid-growing season (Cowardin, 1979). The NWI classifications of River Gut adjacent to the VICHEM site are shown on Figure A-2. 2.5 Floodplains The entire VICHEM site lies within the 100-year floodplain of River Gut as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEIvLA) (1992). FEMA has not established base flood elevations or flood hazard factors for this area. The 100-year floodplain in the area of the VICHEM site, as mapped by FEMA, is presented in Figure A-3. During a heavy rain storm on May 9, 1995, that lasted approximately 4 hours, HLA field personnel documented runoff 0.5 to 2 feet deep flowing over a majority of the VICHEM site (Photographs 3 and 4). 2.6 Regional Watershed The River Gut watershed upstream of the VICHEM site drains an area of approximately 5.89 square miles. The regional watershed boundaries for River Gut are presented in Figure A-4. \VVORK\29872''£CO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 303317 3.0 HABITAT The entire VICHEM site is characterized as upland habitat. Based on observations made during the ecological field reconnassance in March, 1995, approximately 50 percent of the VICHEM site is developed and is covered by buildings, concrete, and process structures. The other 50 percent of the VICHEM site is a mix of barren land (approximately 47 percent) and vegetated areas (approximately 3 percent). Figure A-5 shows the habitats on the VICHEM site. Prior to HLA's investigation, undeveloped areas within the VICHEM site fence were overgrown with vegetation dominated by Leucaena glauca (tan tan). Most of the vegetation within the site area was removed with excavation equipment in January 1995 to facilitate VICHEM site investigation activities. Dense vegetation was identified adjacent to the VICHEM site to the north and east. This dense offsite vegetation is apparent in Photographs 2, 3, 4, and 7. Rudy G. O'Reilly, Jr., an extension agent with the University of the Virgin Islands Cooperati\-e Extension Service located on St. CroLx, assisted HLA with the identification of the flora and fauna present on the VICHEM site. Flora The inventory of environmental resources was performed in April 1995, after vegetation removal activities had taken place. During the Phase I site reconnaissance the majority of the VICHEM site was clear. Some vegetation had begun to grow back and some had not been cleared originally because it was either too large or too close to VICHEM site structures to be taken out. Much of the VICHEM site not covered by bare ground, structures, or paved concrete was found to be dominated by Panicum maximum (guinea grass) and various other common grasses. Along the sides of buildings and sprouting up in many of the open areas of the VICHEM site was Leucaena glauca (tan tan). This species apparently dominated the VICHEM site before vegetation clearing activities were performed. Ceiba petandra (monkey-no-climb), cattle tongue (scientific name unknown), and Andira inermis (common name unknowm) were identified adjacent to the northwestern side of the laboratory building. A single mature Mangifera indica (mango) tree was identified near the scale in the northern corner of the VICHEM site. Along the southwestern side of the laboratory buUding, vegetation is growing in the remnants of a planted garden. Identified in this area were Setcreasea purpurea (purple queen), Kalanchoe blossfeldiana (kalanchoe), Capparis flexuosa (limber caper), and Pedilanthus tithymaloides (Christmas candle), all of which are planted ornamentals. Fauna Animal life identified on the VICHEM site during HLA's April 1995 site reconnaissance consisted of six species of birds, one mammalian species, one amphibian species, two reptiles, one species of spider, and two species of insect. Coereba flaveola (bananaquit) and Margarops fuscatus (peai!y-e\^ed thrasher) were the two most prevalent bird species observed onsite. Tyrannus dominicensis (gray kingbird) was observed occasionally on the edge of the VICHEM site property. An individual Buteo jamaicensis (red-tailed hawk) was obser\'ed flying over the VICHEM site. Bubulcus ibis (cattle egret) were occasionally seen on the VICHEM site, usually in association with a herd of free roaming domestic goats. A species of dove was also observed perching on VICHEM site buUdings. \WORiC\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 303318 A herd of free roaming domestic goats was observed regularly grazing on the VICHEM site and drinking water from the open drainage channels around the process area. An individual Herpestes auropunctatus (mongoose) vvas observed und(3r the tanks in the tank farm. What were beheved to be Bufo marinus (marine toad)'tadpoles were observed living in the ponded water in the surface drains around the process pit. Ariolis acutus (tree lizard) were prevalent on the VICHEM site, often clinging • to buildings, equipment, and vegetation. An individual Sphaerodactylus spp. (gecko species) was observed on the VICHEM site. One type of Arachnid (Orb-weaver spider, species unknown) was observed in areas of tall grass on the VICHEM site. The two types of insect observed on the VICHEM site were termites and mosquito larvae. Termite nests were observed in trees adjacent to the \'ICHEM site and termite trails were observed oh the VICHEM site in the near surface soUs and on the sides of VICHEM site buildings. Mosquito, larvae were observed living in the ponded water in drainage ditches around the process pit area. , \WORK\29872\EC'0\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates ; 303319 j 4.0 SPECIES OF CONCERN To identify plant and animal species of potential concern on the VICHEM site, HLA used a combination of the Government of the Virgin Islands list and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists of rare, threatened, or endangered plants and animals"and a limited field'reconnaissance of the VICHEM site. A formal field survey of threatened and endangered species was not conducted as part of these activities. The Virgin Islands and federal lists of endangered plants and animals are provided in Attachment C. The lists cover species of concern for the three United States Virgin Islands, with the specific island distribution of many species noted. The species listed are for the entire island.. The lists, however, are not applicable to a specific location and do not indicate habitat type utilized by the species of concern. The lists presented in Attachment C are for reference and do not indicate the presence of the species of concern on the VICHEM site. The field reconnaissance conducted iii April 1995 did not identify any habitat on'the VICPIEM site considered to be suited to support rare, threatened, or endangered species populations. The probability that species listed, as being threatened or endangered are present v\'ithin or utilize the VICHEM site as an important part of their habitat is believed to be low. Development on the VICHEM site, the channelization of River Gut, and the intense development and activity on properties adjacent to the VICHEM site would likely have eliminated any native populations of species of concern from the area. In addition, the industrial nature of the VICHEM site and activities on adjacent sites do not create favorable conditions for sensitive species to reestablish themselves. \\VOR10,29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 6 , 303320 ! 5.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 5.1 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology The Island of St. Croix is composed primarily of limestone and'volcaniclastic sediments. It is located at the juncture of the Greater Antilles and Lesser Antilles Geologic Provinces in the northeastern corner of the Caribbean Sea. The island lies upon a submarine platform that is separated from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Platform by the Virgin Islands Basin and the Anegada Passage (Gill, 1989). The VICHEM site is located in the central basin of St; Croix. The central basin is a graben structure containing primarily late Cretaceous Age and younger calcareous sediments. The four major geologic formations of the central basin are the Mt. Eagle Group, thejealousy Formation, Kingshill Limestone, and alluvium. According to D.G. Jordan (1975), groundwater discharges to River Gut from the thin alluvium between Holy Cross Church and.Centerline Road (approximately 3,000 feet upstream of the VICHEM site), but frequent replenishment of the.aquifer is necessary to maintain base.flow. In the drought of 1964, studies revealed that this alluvial aquifer, without replenishment, contributed approximately 10 million gallons to the base flow of River Gut tn smaller quantities over a 6-month period. Jordan (1975) also reports that flow tn the River Gut stream' channel is recharged to the alluviun.i aquifer almost continuously between Centerltne Road and the tidal estuary of River Gut, which includes the area of River Gut adjacent to the VICHEM site. The alluvium is predominantly lo^v permeability, montmortlltnitic clay \vi\h relatively higher permeability layers of sand and gravel, ranging from 1 to 8 feet tn thickness. The interconnection between the higher permeability layers is unknown. Geraghty and Miller' (1983) reported that the alluvial aquifer appears to be under semi- confined conditions. - ' 5.2 VICHEM Site Geology and Hydrogeology The stratigr-aphy beneath the VICHEM site appears to be consistent with the alluvial deposits described previously _by USGS and others. HLA boring logs indicate that the VICHEM site is underlain by at least 25 feet of sandy clay.silty clay withTenses of gravelly sand, and sUty sand.. Generally, the layers appear to be discontinuous. The lowermost layer encountered is a stlty sand which appears to be continuous across the VICHEM site. The top of this layer was encountered atdepths ranging from 24 to 33 feet below grade. Robinson 1972, reported two municipal supply well fields located near the VICHEM site: the Fairplain well'field approximately 900, feet dowmgradient of the VICHEM site and the Adventure fields approximately 3,000 feet upgradient of the VICHEM site. Both of these well fields were reported to pump from alluvial deposits and the underlying Kingshill formation. • Both of.these well fields had declining well jdelds as of 1972. Groundwater was encountered in the borings that were drilled in the laboratory expansion area (ESI, 1984). Groundwater was reported at approximately 20 feet below grade (approximately lOto 20 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Ground^vater encountered during HLA's 1995 VICHEM site investigation was between 20 and 27 feet below grade. ~ , \VVORK\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates . • .' ' ' r 303321 6.0 SOILS Soil type was determined from a soil map prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). John Davis of NRCS stated that the soils map and descriptions have come from 4'years of recent field work and that the NRCS map has replaced the older 1970 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) map. The'NRCS soU survey is still in its preliminary stage and has not been published yet (NRCS, 1995). The soil t\'pes in the area of the VICHEM site are presented in Figure A-6. The northern and central portions of the VICHEM site lie on Glynn gravelly loam, 5 to 12 percent - slopes. The Glyrm series consists of deep, gently sloping, well-drained soils that formed in clay loam and clayey sediments over stratified sandy loam', clay loam, and clay. These soils occur on alluvial fans. A typical profile has an approximately 12-inch thick.s'orface layer of dark-brown clay loam. The upper part of the subsoil is a dark yello\\dsh-brown, firm clay while the lower part is a dark yellowish- brown and yellowish;brown, friable clay loam. The substratum begins at a depth of approximately 4 feet and consists of a yellowish-brown and strong-brown, stratified sandy loam, clay loam, and clay. The southern portion of the VICHEM site lies on Arawak gravelly loam with 5 to 12 percent slopes. This soil type is very stony. Additional inforniation about this soil series and soil t^'pe was not available at the time of report. " • , \VVOR10,29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates ' • , 8 i 303322 'L- 7.0 TOPOGRAPHY The VICHEM site is located in a valley. Surface:elevations at the VICHEM site range from approximately 30 to 40 feet above MSL. Land to the southwest (approximately 200 feet) and to the east (approximately 1,000 feet) of the VICHEM site slopes steeply upward to roughly 150 to 200 feet above MSL. The surface slopes gently across the VICHEMsite from southwest to northeast. Ground surface just beyond the northeastern and eastern fence lines slopes steeply downward approximately 12 to 15 feet into the gut. A berm partially separates the aboveground storage tanks in the western part of the facility from the remainder of the VICHEM site. The topography of the area of the VICHEM site is presented in Figure A-7. , ' ' \VVOR]0,29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates ] 303323 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 VICHEM Site The VICHEM site is an abandoned industrial site that manufactured chemicals and pharmaceuticals in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The United States Enviromnental Protection Agency reported in 1989 (EPA, 1989) that after the VICHEM site was closed as a chemical manufacturing facility, it was leased for use as'a kennel and for the storage of chemicals and fuel. At present the VICHEM site has no . • ongoing operations. Based on discussion with EPA, HLA understands that planned future use of the site is as a recycling center. • > ' 8.2 Zoning The VICHEM site property is currently zoned for light industrial use (I-l) (Public Works, 1995). Local zoning boundaries, are presented in Figure A-8. , ' 8.2.1 Coastal Zone Management The government of the U.S. Virgin Islands has established a two-tiered approach to the management and protection of coastal zones. Tier ,1 areas are those in close proximity to and with a direct impact upon coastal zones. Tier 1 areas are subject to Coastal Zone Management Regulations, such as requirements for performing environmental assessments, prior to construction activities. Tier 2 is made up of inland areas that do not have a direct impact upon the coastal zones and thus have fewer regulations than Tier 1 areas. According,to Stevie Henry of the Coastal Zone Management office on St. Croix, the VICHEM site lies wifhin Tier 2. A map showing the Coastal 'Zone Management boundary is presented in Figurei A-9. 8.3 Surrounding Land Use The land use surrounding the VICHEM site is a mix of open space, light.industrial and heavy industrial uses. Bordering the site to the southwest is an undeveloped lot, reportedly owmed liiy CHS Holding Compajiy. A wooded lot with a well installed by the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA) that is currently not in use is located to,the southeast .of the site. Located approximately 800 feet to the southwest of the site is a concrete water catchment pad constructed by the U.S. Military that formerly collected rainfall runoff. The Old Golden Grove Well Field is located approximately 1,200 feet to the w?est of the site. Additional surrounding land uses are discussed in • Section 8.4' below. 8.4 Surrounding Sites of Potential Environmental Concern HLA identified 8 surrounding sites of potential environmental concern within approximately one quarter mile (1,320 feet) of the VICHEM property. The nearby sites of potential environmental concern include: , / . , ' • Charlie's Concrete Service • Virgin Islands Paving Company '. • FLx-It-Right Transmission • King's Automotive , ' \VVORK\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep ' Harding .Lawson,Associates 10 303324 Meridian Engineering Virgin Islands Asphalt Products Company Golden Grove Adult Correctional Facility Zenon Construction Company Charlie's Concrete Service Charlie's Concrete Service (Charlie's) is located approximately 100 feet east of the site, across River Gut. Charlie's manufactures Redi-Mix concrete. Virgin Islands Paving Company -Virgin Islands Paving Company (VIPC) is located, approximately 300 feet north of the site across River Gut. VIPC manufactures asphalt. Fix-It-Right Transmission Fix-It-Right Transmission, an automobile repair facility, is located approximately 400 feet northeast of .the site- across River. Gut. The property appears to have been a former service station and may contain underground storage tanks. King's Automotive King's Automotive (King's) is located approxirnately 400 feet east of the site across River Gut. King;s currently operates as an automobile repair and body shop. Meridian Engineering Meridian Engineering is located approximately 600 feet northwest of the site. This site is listed as a Facility Index Site (Finds), which indicates that the site may appear on other regulatory lists. Virgin Islands Asphalt Products Company Virgin Islands Asphalt Products Company (VLAPCO) is located approximately 700 feet north\vest of the site across River Gut. VLAPCO specializes in the installation of asphalt roads, driveways, and parking areas. . Golden Grove Adult Correctional Facility The Golden Grove Adult Correctional Facility is located approximately 1,100 feet northwest of the VICHEM site. Zenon Construction Company Zenon Construction Company (Zenon) is located approximately 1,300 feet southeast of the site. Zenon provides construction materials and equipment for building and repair projects. \WORK\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 11 303325 ~> . _ j 9.0 CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY The climate of St. Croix is dry and tropical, with average monthly temperatures between 75° and 85°F. Throughout much of the year, the trade wands blow steadily out of the northeast at 10 to 20 miles per hour (Multer, 1974). ' ' . . Data on precipitation and temperature were obtained from the Alexander Hamilton Airport, approximately 1/2 nule southwest of the site. Average total annual precipitation is 44.57 inches. Greatest rainfall occurs between August and November.' According to Forman (1974), long-term- average rainfall has not changed significantly over the past 112 years. \VVORK'\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 12 303326 10.0 REFERENCES Caribbean Drilling Services Incorporated. 1979. Subsurface Investigation - Proposed Cooper Laboratories Plant Expansion, Estate Bethlehem, St. Croix, May 12. Caribbean Drilling Services Incorporated. 1980. Subsurface Investigation, Proposed Firewater Tank, Cooper Laboratories Plant, Fredericksted, St. Croix, August 19. ' , Cherry, G., United States Geologic Service', Puerto Rico. 1995. Personal communication with Andrew Chartrand, HLA, April 17. ' ' Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. 1994.' EDR-ZIPIPLUS Report for Island Chemical Companv Inc., Route 66 (Plot f3Q], Christiansted, VI 00820, November 21. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. 1994. EDR-ZIPIPLUS Report for Island Chemical Company Inc., • Route 66 (Plot 13QJ, Fredericksted, VI 00840, November 21. • ' ' Enviro-Science. 1984. Progress Report for Island Chemical Company/Chemical Contamination, October 1. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1992. Flood Insurance Rate Map, U.S. Virgin Islands, Island of St. Croix, August 3. Forman, R.T.T. 1974. An Introduction to the Ecosystems and Plants on St. Croi>c, U.S. Virgin Islands. In Guidebook to the Geology and Ecology of Some Marine and Terrestrial Environments, St. Croix, U.S: Virgin Islands. Special Publication No. 5. West Indies Laboratory, Farleigh Dickinson University. Geraghty &-Miller, Inc. 1983. Report on Current Groundwater Conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands, AprU 29. , - ' Henry, S., St. Croix Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management. 1995. Personal communica:tion with Andrew Chartrand and Alan Finio, HLA, April 11. Jordan, D.G. 1975. A Survey of the Water Resources of SL Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. A United States Geologic Service Open-File Report. Multer, H.G. and L.C. Gerhard ed. 1974. Guidebook to the Geology and Ecology of Some Marine and . Terrestrial Environments, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Special Publication No.'^S. West Indies Laboratory, Farleigh Dickinson University. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1995. Soil Survey of St. Croix. Ogden, J.C. 1974. The Major Marine Environments of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. In Guidebook to the Geology and Ecology of Some Marine and Terrestrial Environments, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Special Publication No. 5. West Indies Laboratory, Farleigh Dickinson University. O'Reilly, R.G., Jr., Extension Agent with the University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service. 1995. Personal communication with Andrew J. Chartrand, HLA, April 12. \VVORlC\29872\ECO\eriicc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 13 303327 I Public, Works of St: Croix. 1995. Zoning Map of St. Croix. Robinson, T.M. 1972. Ground-water in central St. Croix, U.S'. Virgin Islands. USGS Open-File Report, Caribbean District. ' , . ' U.S. Department of Agriculture, "Soil Conservation Service. 1970. Soil Survey, Virgin Islands of the United States, August. , ,• - U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. National Wetlands Inventory. Map of Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, February. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989.. Preliminary Assessment, Removal Evaluation and Funding Authorization Request for a CERCLA Removal Action at the Virgin Island Chemical Company, 'Inc., Site, St. Croix.V.S. Virgin Islands-ACTION MEMORANDUM.^Augusi 8. U.S. Geological Survey. 1982. Christiansted, St. Croix 7.5-minute Quadrangle. \VVORK\29872\ECO\erucc.rep Harding Lawson Associates 14 1 ; 3 0 3 3 2 8 ! 'S^^S^^S^S^^-^^f^^S^m^S^9^9»?!^<S?^X^-^f«iTf<!^:i3i<<.-^>. ^ ^ > o X m O cz m 303330 t UEGENP PALUSTRINE FORESTED BROAD-LEAVED EVERGREEN TEMPORARILY FLOODED RIVERINE LOWER PERENNIAL UNCONSOUDATED BOTTOM PERMANENTLY FLOODED LEJQEND BUILDING STREAM ROAD TREE UNE WETTJkND DIVIDE AND DESIGNATION 0 200 400 600 FT. -3 FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Harding Lawson Associates NATIONAL INVENTORY WETLAND MAP "CURE Etiglnoorlntj otirl Environmoiital Setvlcos 13) North rtiird Strout Phlaldolphia, PA I'JIOC 215-642-1570 VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS A-2 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APPROVED RLE ICCBHWI DATE 5/30/95 REVISED DATE 303331 303332 SURFACE WATER ROAD STREAM WATERSHED BOUNDARY UNE 1500 3000 4500 FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Harding Lawson Associates I Z Englnoorlncj anH ^ ^ iLnvirunrdunlnl ^oivlcotj — 131 Norlli Third Street ^ ^ Phlladelphio, PA 19106 ~ 215-627-4505 REGIONAL WATERSHED MAP VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS ncuRE A-4 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APi'ROVED ULE ICCBH20 DATE REVISED NO. 7/27/95 303333 303334 LEGEND ARAWAK GRAVELLY LOAM, 5 TO 12 PERCENT SLOPES. VERY STONY ARAWAK GRAVELLY LOAM. 12 TO 20 PERCENT SLOPES, VERY STONY ARAWAK GRAVELLY LOAM. 20 TO -40 PERCENT SLOPES. VERY S T O N Y ARAWAK GRAVELLY LOAM. M} TO 70 PERCENT SLOPES. VERY STONY GLYNN GRAVELLY LOAM. 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES GLYNN GRAVELLY LOAM. 2 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES GLYNN GRAVELLY LOAM. 5 TO 12 PERCENT SLOPES SION CLAY. 2 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES LEGEND BUILDING STREAM ROAD TKEE UNE SOIL DIVIDE AND DESIGNATION 200 400 600 FT. FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Harding Lawson Associates Engineering and Envlronmotilal Sorvlcos 131 North Third Street Phioldeiphia, PA 19106 215-642-1570 SOILS MAP VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS FIGURE A-6 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APPROVED RLE ICCBSOIL DATE 7/26/95 REVISED DATE 303335 LEGEND BUILDING STREAM ROAD TREE UNE CONTOUR UNE 0 200 400 600 FT. ^?5 FOR ILLUSTIMTION PURPOSES ONLY H a r d i n g Lawson Associates ZI!IZZ Englnooring and !irZZ3 Environmontal :iofvlc;nu r i ~ 131 North Third Street ' J l l ^ ^ Phioldeiphia. PA 19106 " " ' 215-642-1570 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS FIGURE A-7 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APi'ROVED FILE ICCBTOPO DATE 5/25/95 REVISED DATE 303336 ZONING LEQENP AGRICULTURAL SECONDARY BUSINESS HEAVY INDUSTRY UGHT INDUSTRY PUBUC LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LEGEND SURFACE WATER ROAD STREAM ZONING BOUNDARY UNE 1500 3000 4500 ^ D O S tt^"' FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Harding Lawson Enrjlnanrlny and Envlronriictilul Lloivlcnu 131 North Third 'Jtreot Philadalphia. PA 19106 215-627-4505 Associates LAND USE ZONING MAP VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE A-8 DRAV/N JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APPROVED RLE ICCBZONE DATE REVISED NO. 7/27/95 303337 y LEGEND SURFACE WATER ROAD STREAM COSTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY UNE 1500 3000 4500 FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY ~ Harding Lawson Associates m Englnooring and ^ Environmental Sotvlcoo ^ 1 3 1 North Third Street ^ Philodelphia, PA 19106 '•^ 215-627-4505 COSTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY LINE VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS RGURE A-9 DRAWN JSW JOB NUMBER 29872.15.1 APPROVED RLE ICCBCOST DATE 7/24/95 REVISED NO. 303338 ^.-•.Vi »T»a;i;}f««JsnS»ii-'ij > o I m 03 303339 ATTACHMENT B HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW 303340 ATTACHMENT B VIRGIN ISLAND CHEMICAL SITE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW Eight aerial photographs, dated from 1959 to 1989, were reviewed in order to determine more information about the VICHEM site ecological history. Descriptions of the area where the site currently exists and of the surrounding region are given for each of the aerial photographs reviewed. February 15, 1954 At this time the site was undeveloped and the landowner and land use was unioiown. Scrubby, sparse vegetation existed over much of the area where the site currently exists, wdth trees located along the gut adjacent to the east and south of the site. The only trees existing in the area appeared to be those in and around the streambed. The trees blocked the \dew of the gut channel, making it impossible to determine if water was present in the channel adjacent to the site. The gut channel flowed past the area where the site currently exists to Route 64 before flowing south along the highway. This course ran to the west of the current gut charmel. Land to the north and east of where the site currently exists was heavily agriculturized and scrubby, sparse vegetation existed adjacent to the south and west of the current VICHEM property. A,.large concrete pad was present atop the ridge between the current VICHEM property and the airport. The beginnings of an air force base could be seen to the southwest of the current VICHEM property. The airport and racetrack existed in much more primitive states than at present. Virtually all of the roads in the area were unpaved, dirt roads. A small housing development existed about one-half mile to the north and another existed about one- half mUe to the northwest of the site. A sufficient amount of water could be seen in the gut from the location where River Gut and Bethlehem Gut meet (downstream of the site] to the ocean. A series of approximately si:< dyked/dammed ponds upstream of the site contained sufficient water and appeared to be the source of the river gut water. April 20, 1959 No changes on the site property and surrounding properties were noted since the 1954 photograph. 303341 1962 The exact date of this photograph is not known. At the time that this photograph was taken, the area where the site currently exists had been at least partially cleared and it appeared as if agricultural operations were underway on the site property. A multiple-acre rectanoular plot had been cleared in the vegetation adjacent to the gut. Some crop lines could be seen on site and also across the gut, where there is currently other industry in existence. The majority of the cleared land appears to have been planted with trees. February 20, 1964 The area where the VICHEM site currently exists was undeveloped as of this date. In addition, the vegetation in the adjacent River Gut was more dense than in previous photographs. The nearby airport and racetrack were vastly expanded and modernized during the 5-year period from 1959 to 1964 and surface drainage channels appear to have been dredged from the airport to the ocean. These drainage channels entered the ocean in close proximity to mangroves. Water could be seen in the River Gut about one-quarter mile upstream of the ocean. Five buildings, which appear to be barracks, were built on the ridge southwest of the site, immediately adjacent to the large concrete pad which had already been constructed by 1959. The Vialco aluminum facility was constructed approximately one mile to the east of where the current site exists and operations began between 1959 and 1964. Between the aluminum plant and the ocean, citrus groves appear to have been planted. Krause lagoon, adjacent to the Vialco facility, had been dyked and partially dredged by this date. This lagoon was virtually, undisturbed in 1959. This region of St. Croix was moving rapidly from an agricultural area to an industrial area. Most of the roadways around the island appeared to have been paved since 1959. However, no new or expanded housing developments had been built in the region around where the site currently exists. February 17, 1971 The site was developed with building and equipment as of this date. According to previously discussed records, Caribe operated the site. Because the poor quality of this photograph provided poor ground resolution, the following photograph will be described in greater detail. 303342 November 20, 1971 The site had been partially cleared and the laboratory, maintenance building, concrete surface equipment area, 20 aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), and the site driveway were all constructed and existed on the site at this time. What appear to be two surface runoff paths originating from the laboratory building and flowing to the east and northeast into the gut appear to be present. An unknown structure, possibly a concrete pad or a shed, existed in the northern corner of the property. Water existed in the gut adjacent to the site and all the way upstream to the dyked ponds at this time. The path of River Gut had been altered by this date. The gut previously ran past site to Route 64 before heading south. As of this date in 1971, the gut wrrapped around the VICHEM site and headed south on the course that it follows today. The adjacent properties across the gut from the site were developed on land that was previously the River Gut channel. In addition to the site having been developed, many adjacent and nearby properties were also developed. To the east of the site, on the opposite side of the gut, a cement company and a paving company appeared to have been built. An asphalt plant and an engineering company were constructed to the northwest of the VICHEM site. A large, unJcnown facility was constructed to the southeast of the site, on the gut. All of these facilities were constructed sometime between 1964 and 1971. Farther away from the site, expansion and industrialization were occurring rapidly. Many of the fields previously used for agriculture were being left fallow or were being developed for commercial, .industrial, or residential use. A large housing development/trailer park was constructed approximately one-half mile to the northeast of the VICHEM site. Along the gut, close to the ocean, a sewage treatment plant was built. To the east of the site, the aluminum facility had greatly expanded. Large areas of boxite and what appear to be settling ponds existed between the plant and the ocean, where a citrus grove had previously existed. To the east of the aluminum plant, the Hess oil refinery had been built and covered a large area with its many oil tanks. The dredging of Krause lagoon area had been completed and was being used exclusively as a shipping charmel. The St. Croix landfill could be seen for the first time, extending out into the ocean to the south of the aluminum plant. Smoke could be seen coming from a fire in the landfill along the oceanfront. January 17, 1974 Between 1971 and 1974, the VICHEM facility continued to expand. A warehouse was constructed onto the northeastern side of the laboratory between 1971 and 1974. The construction of the Melvin Evans Highway to the east of the site. 303343 November 14, 1977 According to previously discussed records, Pierrel America, Inc. (formerly Caribe) continued to operate the site. A great amount of water was present in the gut adjacent to and upstream of the site. The vegetation in and along the edge of the gut appeared to have been cut back on the northeastern side of the site. A path/road existed from the warehouse building, across the gut, to the adjacent cement company. The vegetation from the gut extended up to the south side of the laboratory building and concrete surface. There appeared to be pooled water present in the southwestern corner of the site. Immediately adjacent to the northwest, west and southeast of the site, the scrubby, sparse vegetation that existed in 1959 had grown into thick stands of trees. Farther from the site, a prison facility was built approximately one-quarter mile to the northwest. The Melvin Evans Highway was built, running from east to west along the southern edge of the VICHEM property. The nearby St. CroLx landfill had expanded inland to border the expanding aluminum plant. November 20, 1988 The VICHEM site changed in many ways between 1977 and 1988. In 1988, VICHEM owned the site. Only 14 ASTs were present, a reduction of six from the northern corner of the property. A water tank and several other small buildings were present on the southern side of the facility. A concrete surface between the laboratory and the maintenance building and a concrete surface for a loading dock to the north of the laboratory were constructed. Vegetation had overgrown much of the northern corner of the site. Water could be seen in the gut adjacent to the site. In the region around the site, the aluminum facility expanded over a much larger area. The part of the St. Croix landfill that extended into the ocean appeared to be inactive as of Lhis date. October 9, 1989 Two drainage pipes coming from the loading dock area and draining into River Gut could be seen. The gut appeared to be dry adjacent to the site, but water could be seen upstream and downstream of the VICHEM site. 303344 !<^Sgx^^S^i5K®SJi«SSSSSSSs»sasStW.t-3S*CSt;i.lS^^ -*• " - ATTACHMENT C LIST OF ENDANGERED SPECIES 303346 E N D A N G E H E D P L A ^ H S A N D A N I M A X ^ Ui^• 'xiiK u ^ Vltiuiss laiwiiNiJo Compflcdhy th» Diviaicn cf n«ii and Wfldlift (DFKEJ, th* XJVl GoopcratlTw Ext<a«ottS«nric«, Elwmor dbncy (CJWIMI Bay), Qtry Bay (U. of Wiiconrin) and WilUaia M£l«jm (UYD. S<d«Rti£c KAUM PLANTS Conmian Name D utribcition/B*ffi£iki Boot nnim BaxQivihlii Btttaoeiw ZintiioayPum diom&tlaniun yirdn Talanda List At»vB e£S«rsiana AlrMccaa Cypttlia humifiua Aorriftilifloeag H M ttrbanii L dderoj^loide* llllandxia Unutispica Mainpi<larla mvoia Optmiia triacxntha ]ilayt«niui cymou. CogyoIvTiTnocjmr OpcrcuUna triqaetm Cnton fiihlockii flibaoeafl Eryihrina a f ^ r t i ! GalacUa esg<riii Malpigkia. waadbuTyuia U. }]ifuti8sima (=pallens) ii, linaarii H&lpighia sp. •BjnrMnima rp. fiTiVr'^tTfi Pajthum ATnpIexicnulfi. Schoap&i Bchreberi Bra<aa7ola cuccullata Epidendrmn bifidum E. dllare £. caAlwitiiTTi BabeaanA alata. Qacidi^m prionochiliiin 0. variegatum Polystachya concr«ta Fooihitva rac«moia ' Prascatida oUfanUuL P. ttaehyoidM Spirxnthes alata TdtxMmicra CJinaHeulata T. eanalictdata alba Vanilla barbell ata Pepcromla myrtlfolia Fplygionaceae ^ Vahl'i boxwood Prickly Aah Effg^r'* agave Urban'* holly Central Amer. oaJt Pinon Wooly nipple Egger'* C«cltfpnT Ejfjer's gulactla Cowage cherry i3 tinging bosh -S'+UvomAs UA^ei:s^ Endanecrad, SLX - May ba eztiact KndangBrad. StT.. SLJ. SLX SLT., SLJ. SLJ., Tortflla SLJ. Barts bromelifld, SLJ., SLT. S ( X , SLJ^ SLT,, offahore cays Buck II. (StXX SLT. SLX, SLT. StJL, St,T. anderaic Racant SLJ. ri^ans^ SLT., B U ^ S t X SLT., SLJ. SLT., SLJ., oflahora cays SLX All VI Similar to M. coccie«ra, SLJ. Naw spaciea?. SLJ. SLJ. S L J „ new Bpadet? N. offldiore on^i? "FtXertiAnicjai iecrN "iT.X. fST.-J. ./V<.«nt «s/-jK+l»^i, ST.-3. SLT., SLJ., SLZ. SLT. SLT. SLT.. Virsin Gorda KtuL «ih«p.. Water Ii, Vanilla orchid Myrtle-laaved PeperomLa SLJ., SLX. 3 0 3 3 4 7 CaXoabaaa malonocarpa Hachaonia woodburyana ManiOcara. bidantata Solantim mncronatum S. conocarpum Pilaa RtehardU yrrffflnnpeae Callicarpa ampla Nnihifl i n a ^ a n s i s ZygpohvPaoeag Guaiacvun ofUdnale Bulla twood Richard'a claarweed Capa tosa Lignum vitae SLX Nrw SLJ, sighfcLngB ' SLT., SLJ. confused taxonomy, SLT., SLJ. I^uta«enlSOO SLT. inib o»«da updaU SLX. W.I., High horL d«mand ANIMALS Federal List Cbalonia my~HaB Eratznochelyi imbricata DsrmochalyB coriaeea Pei«c«nus occidentalli Falco pereETinus Epicnitit monienlis jranti S^tiTtA.doct^o lU i V i r g i n T s J a n d s Lirst, Mflbnya mabotiLa. Otua nudipes newtoni Cherd«il«e jfufidLichii Anthracothorai dorainicus Podiceps dominicus Stama. antiUaroza Phaalhon l^^turoB Ardea herodiua Caaiuarodiua albtu Egrattathula NycUcorai pjirticor*! Iirobrychaa exllis Anaa balxamenaia Oxyura jamaicenslB Rallua longiroEtria Fullca carlbea Charadrina alexandrintu Catoptrophonia lemipalmatus PuiTiniis Ihenninieri Aratinga pcrtinaT Columba leacocepKala Otjotiyson n i y ^ c e a MyiarchuB ttoUduS HoctiUo laporinaa Stenoderma mftim Brachypbylla. cavBrnarum Order Antipatharia Epin«phela2 itsgara Gtttn turtle Hawksblll turtle L«atherback turtle Brown palican Peregrins falcon Slipperybaclc flklnk VI Screech owl West Indian nighthawk Antillean mango Least grebe Least tern White-tailed tropicbird GL blxie heron Great (carmnoD) «gret Snowy egret Bl*ck-eT. night h«r«tl Least bittern Eabasia dude Eaddy duck Clapper rail Caribbean coot Snowy plover Willet Audnhon ahearwater Brown-throatad parakeet White-crowned pigton Bridled Quail dove Stolid flycatcher Fisherman bat Eedfnutbat Cavcbat Black coral Jewfish Threatened, Keaident, breeding Endangered, ReaidonL braedlng Endangered, Migrant, breeding Endangered, Resident, breeding Endangered, Winter migrant Bndangcred, F.csidcnt, brecdin£ £n<iorg'«r«i, J?esid<rr^tr««di>C7 T ^ r t d S j e d , fibn»nt; bre«dino^/ teed, fibnsnt: bre«dinoi/ H«sident, breeding Resident, breeding Resident, breeding? ResidenL brasding? Resident, hraedjng? MigranL braading Eaaident, breeding Raddant, breeding Ra*idftnt, breeding BasidenL braading Ba,ridmL breeding BasidenL breeding? EesidenL br««ding Peripheral realdent £a<idant, breeding Baaident, breeding Baaideni, breeding? BaridenL breeding Migrant, br««ding ResidenL breeding Raaldent, breeding Saaident, breeding Raddent, breeding Eaaldant, breeding Realdent, breading BeaidenL breeding Marine b«nthic, high demand Marine The above list represents plants and pnimnls occuiing in the US Virgin M a u d s which are protected by either the US Endangered Speciea Act of 1973 or the VI Endangered pnd Indigenoxia Species Act of 1990 (Act No. 5665). Thia list is prromulgatad under Act 56S5, Section 104(g) and may be revised as new infannation becomes available. Roy E^Adams, Commissioner, DPITR 303348 Data Summary Report Virgin Island Chemical Site, Inc. St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands DISTRIBUTION COPY 1 Copies Copies 1 through 7 (1 unbound) Copy 8 Copy 9 Copies 10 through 12 Copies 13 through 15 United States Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Eastern New York/Caribbean Superfund Region II Emergency and Remedial Response Division United States Environmental Protection Agency 290 Broadway New York, New York 10007-1866 Attention: Virgin Island Chemical Site Project Coordinator Chief, New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch Office of Regional Counsel United States Environmental Protection Agency 290 Broadway New York, New York 10007-1866 Attention: Virgin Island Chemical Site Attorney Government of the Virgin Islands of the United States Department of Planning and Natural Resources Division of Envtronmental Protection Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands 00802 Attention: Virgin Island Chemical Site Project Manager Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin, Tischman, Epstein & Gross One Riverfront Plaza Newark, New Jersey 07102-5400 Harding Lawson Associates Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Quality Assurance/Quality Control Bharat Patel, P.G. Managing Associate Hydrogeologist This document was prepared for the sole use of the VICHEM and the regulatory agencies involved with the project, the only intended beneficiaries of our work. No other parties should rely on the information contained herein without the prior written consent of HLA. 303349