AKEEM GUMBS VS LOUIS PENN JR.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AKEEM R. GUMBS, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS PENN, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-0030 ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motions purportedly seeking relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF Nos. 53 and 54.) On March 24, 2017, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Judgment dismissing this case based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim for relief. (ECF Nos. 13 and 14.)The Court sees no reason to revisit that ruling. Further, the Court finds that the Plaintiff’s motion seeking relief under Rule 60(b) is baseless and without merit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions seeking relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ECF Nos. 53 and 54, are DENIED; it is further ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on Plaintiff by first class mail return receipt requested. Dated: October 21, 2022 s/ Robert A. Molloy _________ ROBERT A. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_16-cv-00030/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_16-cv-00030-2.pdf
SHA-256 4316022066c166e6202e0566c9999904007d33646bbdbbc966507227c519dfd7
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-4316022066c1
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AKEEM R. GUMBS, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS PENN, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-0030 ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motions purportedly seeking relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF Nos. 53 and 54.) On March 24, 2017, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Judgment dismissing this case based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim for relief. (ECF Nos. 13 and 14.)The Court sees no reason to revisit that ruling. Further, the Court finds that the Plaintiff’s motion seeking relief under Rule 60(b) is baseless and without merit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions seeking relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ECF Nos. 53 and 54, are DENIED; it is further ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on Plaintiff by first class mail return receipt requested. Dated: October 21, 2022 s/ Robert A. Molloy _________ ROBERT A. MOLLOY Chief Judge Case: 3:16-cv-00030-RAM-RM Document #: 58 Filed: 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1