USA v. Boyce
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal Action No. 2014-00029 MICHAEL BOYCE, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Rhonda Williams-Henry, Esq., Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Yvette D. Ross-Edwards, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Bureau of Corrections Disciplinary Hearing Records and Statements made by Defendant at Disciplinary Hearing and any Testimony Related Thereto” (Dkt. No. 71), “Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Records” (Dkt. No. 74), “Motion to Suppress Statements” (Dkt. No. 75), the Government’s responses thereto (Dkt. Nos. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00029/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00029-1.pdf
SHA-256 43b38d6f55151b1000d44f3540f1c3f5ccb19b268a4e934cfef2dd1d5d0f7479
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-43b38d6f5515
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal Action No. 2014-00029 MICHAEL BOYCE, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Rhonda Williams-Henry, Esq., Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Yvette D. Ross-Edwards, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Bureau of Corrections Disciplinary Hearing Records and Statements made by Defendant at Disciplinary Hearing and any Testimony Related Thereto” (Dkt. No. 71), “Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Records” (Dkt. No. 74), “Motion to Suppress Statements” (Dkt. No. 75), the Government’s responses thereto (Dkt. Nos. 86, 87, 88), the evidence adduced at the consolidated hearing, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Bureau of Corrections Disciplinary Hearing Records and Statements made by Defendant at Disciplinary Hearing and any Testimony Related Thereto” is GRANTED; and it is further Case: 1:14-cr-00029-WAL-GWC Document #: 137 Filed: 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2 2 ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Records” is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion to Suppress Statements” is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: February 26, 2015 _______/s/________ RAYMOND L. FINCH Senior District Judge Case: 1:14-cr-00029-WAL-GWC Document #: 137 Filed: 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2