VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. Griffin et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2016-05-18
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KISHMA WEEKS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2015-32 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Delia L. Smith, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the United States of America, Yohana M. Manning Christiansted, VI 00802 For defendant Kishma Weeks. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Kishma Weeks (“Weeks”) to waive her speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including September 15, 2016. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that a defendant be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Weeks’s counsel to recover from a serious Case: 3:15-cr-00032-CVG-RM Document #: 331 Filed: 05/18/16 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Weeks Criminal No. 2015-32 Order illness. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cr-00032/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cr-00032-1.pdf

SHA-256 4760822678632f457921fa533656282da04c08ccd8685b85ed5ef55b86caa22f

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-476082267863

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KISHMA WEEKS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2015-32 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Delia L. Smith, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the United States of America, Yohana M. Manning Christiansted, VI 00802 For defendant Kishma Weeks. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Kishma Weeks (“Weeks”) to waive her speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including September 15, 2016. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that a defendant be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Weeks’s counsel to recover from a serious Case: 3:15-cr-00032-CVG-RM Document #: 331 Filed: 05/18/16 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Weeks Criminal No. 2015-32 Order illness. Second, the defendant made this request with the advice and consent of counsel. Third, without an extension, the parties would be denied reasonable time necessary to explore plea options and to adequately prepare for trial. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that "whether or not a case is 'unusual' or 'complex,' an ends of justice continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted." United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994)(citing United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994)("An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial . . . even though a case is not complex")); see also United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1071(1983)(no abuse of discretion where district court found that a multiple count, multiple defendant "case was complex and required additional time for adequate preparation."); United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992)("district court did not abuse its discretion [by delaying trial] to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense."). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through September 15, 2016, shall be Case: 3:15-cr-00032-CVG-RM Document #: 331 Filed: 05/18/16 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Weeks Criminal No. 2015-32 Order excluded in computing the time within which a trial must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:15-cr-00032-CVG-RM Document #: 331 Filed: 05/18/16 Page 3 of 3