DESIR URIAS VS HOVENSA L.L.C.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 URIAS DESIR, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:07-cv-97 v. 5 5 HOVENSA, LLC, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Linda J. Blair, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Supplement Its Responses to Discovery (Docket No. 55). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply thereto. The parties met and conferred on May 7, 2010, and were unable to resolve their discovery disputes. The Court has reviewed said filings and, upon due consideration thereof, makes the following findings and conclusions regarding the discovery at issue: Interrogatory No. 4: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Case: 1:07-cv-00097-DWA-DWA Document #: 70 Filed: 09/17/10 Page 1 of 4 Desir v. HOVENSA, L.L.C. 1:07-cv-97 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Interrogatory No. 10: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00097/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00097-0.pdf
SHA-256 4991410255e2bd52bfcc22c47958bc9249b7750970539d04df89250d72ce9f43
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-4991410255e2
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 URIAS DESIR, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:07-cv-97 v. 5 5 HOVENSA, LLC, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Linda J. Blair, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Supplement Its Responses to Discovery (Docket No. 55). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply thereto. The parties met and conferred on May 7, 2010, and were unable to resolve their discovery disputes. The Court has reviewed said filings and, upon due consideration thereof, makes the following findings and conclusions regarding the discovery at issue: Interrogatory No. 4: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Case: 1:07-cv-00097-DWA-DWA Document #: 70 Filed: 09/17/10 Page 1 of 4 Desir v. HOVENSA, L.L.C. 1:07-cv-97 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Interrogatory No. 10: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Interrogatory No. 11: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Interrogatory No. 13: Defendant shall supplement its response by providing a copy of the responses it provided to the Department of Labor as stated in the original response. Interrogatory No. 22: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Demand No. 1: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Demand No. 4: Defendant has responded adequately to this request. No further response is necessary. Demand No. 5: Defendant shall supplement its response by providing a copy of the responses it provided to the Department of Labor as stated in the original response. Case: 1:07-cv-00097-DWA-DWA Document #: 70 Filed: 09/17/10 Page 2 of 4 Desir v. HOVENSA, L.L.C. 1:07-cv-97 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Demand No. 6: Defendant shall supplement its response by producing a copy of any and all complaints, claims, and/or lawsuits from 2002 to the present for which black, West Indian employees accused HOVENSA of discrimination due to race, national origin, and/or color regarding proper pay rate and/or promotion. Demand No. 8: Defendant shall supplement its response by providing a copy of the Complaint in Joseph v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., District Court Case No. 1:00-cv-54. Demand No. 19: Defendant has responded adequately to the demand. No further response is necessary. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Urias Desir’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Supplement Its Responses to Discovery (Docket No. 55) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2.. Defendant shall supplement as directed hereinabove, specifically, Interrogatory No. 13 and Demand for Production Nos. 5, 6, and 8, within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order. Case: 1:07-cv-00097-DWA-DWA Document #: 70 Filed: 09/17/10 Page 3 of 4 Desir v. HOVENSA, L.L.C. 1:07-cv-97 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery ENTER: Dated: September 17, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:07-cv-00097-DWA-DWA Document #: 70 Filed: 09/17/10 Page 4 of 4