USA v. Quninones-Davila et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Magistrate No. 2015-0029 ) Criminal No. 2015-0042 JOSE HODGE, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Yvette D. Ross-Edwards, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Jose Hodge’s “Motion to Dismiss Complaint” (Dkt. No. 37), the Government’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 43), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Hodge’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: January 22, 2016 _______/s/________ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:15-cr-00042-WAL-GWC Document #: 106 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_15-cr-00042/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_15-cr-00042-2.pdf
SHA-256 4d1d96433a8b0ca010e85f2a26fd3a2d95d559e1e7caa29ad228c4438afb9f05
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-4d1d96433a8b
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Magistrate No. 2015-0029 ) Criminal No. 2015-0042 JOSE HODGE, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Yvette D. Ross-Edwards, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Jose Hodge’s “Motion to Dismiss Complaint” (Dkt. No. 37), the Government’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 43), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Hodge’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: January 22, 2016 _______/s/________ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:15-cr-00042-WAL-GWC Document #: 106 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 1