Smith, Shirley L v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SHIRLEY L. SMITH, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL NO. 2002-227 (STT) : v. : : VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT : AUTHORITY, et al., : : Defendants. : ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants Virgin Islands Port Authority (“VIPA”) and Virgin Islands Port Authority Governing Board’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 237 & 238) regarding the applicability of 29 V.I.C. § 556(c), pro se Plaintiff Shirley L. Smith’s Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 219 & 239), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 240), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum. S/ James T. Giles HONORABLE JAMES T. GILES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (Sitting By Designation) Case: 3:02-cv-00227-JRS Document #: 395 Filed: 09/03/08 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_02-cv-00227/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_02-cv-00227-10.pdf
SHA-256 542987ecfdaa2acddb1226f789d32c76453f1a5887e5a975739cfd07c483e2da
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-542987ecfdaa
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SHIRLEY L. SMITH, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL NO. 2002-227 (STT) : v. : : VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT : AUTHORITY, et al., : : Defendants. : ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants Virgin Islands Port Authority (“VIPA”) and Virgin Islands Port Authority Governing Board’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 237 & 238) regarding the applicability of 29 V.I.C. § 556(c), pro se Plaintiff Shirley L. Smith’s Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 219 & 239), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 240), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum. S/ James T. Giles HONORABLE JAMES T. GILES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (Sitting By Designation) Case: 3:02-cv-00227-JRS Document #: 395 Filed: 09/03/08 Page 1 of 1