Site Investigation Report, Ramsay Motors, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island.
eCOOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCIENTISTS SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT RAMSAY MOTORS TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. DECEMBER 1993 *64524* 64524 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT RAMSAY MOTORS TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PREPARED FOR: CAMPBELL, ARELLANO & RICH P. O. BOX 11899 CHARLOTTE AMALIE, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. PREPARED BY: COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH, SUITE Q CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statement of Purpose 1 1.2 Summary of Results and Conclusions 5 2.0 BACKGROUND 8 2.1 Site Location 8 2.2 Site Description 8 2.3 Site and Area Topography 9 2.4 Site History 9 2.5 Previous Investigation Activities 10 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 12 3.1 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in April 1993 12 3.1.1 UST Pad Decontamination 12 3.1.2 Concrete Core Drilling 13 3.1.3 Equipment Decontamination 13 3.1.4 Soil Sampling 13 3.1.5 Liquid Sampling 14 3.2 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in July 1993 14 3.2.1 Equipment Decontamination 15 3.2.2 Soil Sampling 15 3.2.3 Drum Sampling 16 4.0 INVESTIGATION RESUL …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/02/64524
SHA-256 542c023db219e8ec72e0256a34081b6038dc89c142875fabe19ca37404ee398c
Re-using this document
CERCLA administrative record
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-542c023db219
Document text
eCOOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCIENTISTS SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT RAMSAY MOTORS TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. DECEMBER 1993 *64524* 64524 SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT RAMSAY MOTORS TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PREPARED FOR: CAMPBELL, ARELLANO & RICH P. O. BOX 11899 CHARLOTTE AMALIE, ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.I. PREPARED BY: COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 2300 SARDIS ROAD NORTH, SUITE Q CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statement of Purpose 1 1.2 Summary of Results and Conclusions 5 2.0 BACKGROUND 8 2.1 Site Location 8 2.2 Site Description 8 2.3 Site and Area Topography 9 2.4 Site History 9 2.5 Previous Investigation Activities 10 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 12 3.1 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in April 1993 12 3.1.1 UST Pad Decontamination 12 3.1.2 Concrete Core Drilling 13 3.1.3 Equipment Decontamination 13 3.1.4 Soil Sampling 13 3.1.5 Liquid Sampling 14 3.2 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in July 1993 14 3.2.1 Equipment Decontamination 15 3.2.2 Soil Sampling 15 3.2.3 Drum Sampling 16 4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS 16 4.1 Soil Chemical Quality Data 16 4.2 Characterization of Oil/Water Mixture Encountered in the Service Area 19 4.3 Characterization of Materials Stored in Drums 20 5.0 INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS 21 6.0 CONCLUSIONS 22 7.0 REFERENCES 24 TABLES Table 1 Summary of Flame lonization Detector Field Screening Results Table 2 Summary of Quantix Immunoassay Field Screening Results Table 3 Laboratory Results - Soil Samples - April 1993 Table 4 Summary of Laboratory Results - Soil Samples - April 1993 Table 5 Laboratory Results - Soil Samples - July 1993 Table 6 Summary of Laboratory Results - Soil Samples - July 1993 Table 7 Laboratory Results - Liquid Samples - April 1993 Table 8 Laboratory Results - Drum Samples - July 1993 Table 9 Summary of Laboratory Results - Drum Samples - July 1993 FIGURES Figure 1 General Location Map Figure 2 Topographic Location Map Figure 3 General Area Map Figure 4 Site Map Figure 5 Isoconcentration Map - Petroleum Related VOAs in Soils Figure 6 Isoconcentration Map - Petroleum Related Semi-VOAs in Soils Figure 7 Isoconcentration Map - TPH in Soils APPENDICES Appendix I Lists of Background Documents Reviewed by CEI Appendix II Letter Explaining Similarities and Differences Between SW-846 and CLP-SOW Methods Appendix III Laboratory Results - April 13 through 19, 1993 Sampling Event Appendix IV Laboratory Results - July 1 through 5, 1993 Sampling Event 1.0 INTRODUCTION On or about April 27, 1992, Ramsay Motors Inc. (Ramsay) was served with a Third Party Complaint by Esso Standard Oil S.A. (ESSO), in the ongoing litigation captioned hi Re Tutu Water Wells Contamination Litigation Master Docket No. 1989-107, pending in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. Campbell, Arellano & Rich, Ramsay's defense counsel, retained Cooper Environmental, Inc. (CEI) to assist Ramsay in responding to ESSO's third party complaint. In particular, counsel retained CEI to assist counsel in investigating ESSO's allegations regarding an underground storage tank in Ramsay's service area (the UST) that stored used automotive crankcase oil from 1978 through 1987, and Ramsay's operations in general on the site from 1978 - 1987. ESSO's third party complaint alleged that the UST and Ramsay's operations contributed to the contamination of the supply wells owned by Plaintiffs Four Winds Plaza Partnership and Plaintiffs PID and the Harthman family with petroleum derivatives and chlorinated volatile organic compounds. In addition, ESSO alleged that Ramsay's operations caused off-site contamination of the ground water or soils in the Tutu area for which ESSO incurred response costs consistent with the National Contingency Plan under CERCLA and RCRA. 1.1 Statement of Purpose CEI was retained to investigate the Ramsay property and develop factual data through physical observations and chemical analysis to ascertain: 1. Whether or not a release of petroleum constituents or chlorinated volatile organic compounds occurred from the underground storage tank into the underground soils, or into the ground water, which could have contributed to the contamination of the Plaintiffs wells, or the contamination of any off-site underground waters or soils in the Tutu Well Fields Area. 2. Whether or not a release of petroleum constituents or chlorinated volatile organic compounds, occurred from any other operations at the Ramsay site, such as general automobile service operations, or the drum storage area, into the underground soils, or into the ground water, which could have contributed to the contamination of the Plaintiffs wells, or the contamination of any off-site underground waters or soils in the Tutu Well Field area. To provide an answer to questions (1) and (2) above, CEI took the following steps to evaluate the site: a. CEI completed an initial physical and walk through inspection on September 14, 1992 of the Ramsay facility and the surrounding area, including a walking tour of the Tutu Well Field site. b. CEI reviewed data developed by others through FOIA requests to the USEPA and the DPNR, and materials Campbell, Arellano & Rich obtained through discovery requests in the litigation. Lists of documents reviewed by CEI is included as Appendix I. The findings of previous investigations at the Ramsay site are summarized in section 2.5. EPA contractors obtained samples from Ramsay's UST and from some site soils in 1987, 1988 and 1989. TEIC collected quarterly samples from Ramsay's supply well from 1990-1992. The Sixth Quarterly Sampling Report (Geraghty & Miller, August 1992) contains analytical results for water supply well samples collected during September 1990 to May 1992. As of the date of report generation, CEI has not received a copy of the Seventh Quarterly Sampling Report. In June 1992, TEIC completed two (2) shallow soil borings on the Ramsay property, and installed monitoring wells upgradient and down gradient of the Ramsay site. The analytical results for soil and ground water samples collected by TEIC were made available to CEI in May 1992 in TEIC's Technical Memorandum II. c. CEI performed sampling of soils and drums at the site in two (2) phases, to be followed by a third phase, if appropriate, to include well installation and sampling and finally, generation of a complete site assessment report. Phase I consisted of completion of and sampling ten (10) shallow soil borings around the UST and service area during the period April 14 to 19, 1993. Laboratory results were evaluated during June 1993 and additional sampling locations for phase two were selected. Phase II consisted of completion and sampling twelve (12) shallow soil borings in the area of the drum pad, and along the fence line with Antilles Automotive. NUS reported a discharge of an oily substance along this fence line in 1989 from the previous tenant, Gassett Motors. In addition, CEI collected four (4) composite samples from the storage drums. The Phase II sampling event was conducted on July 1 through 5, 1993. Laboratory results were evaluated during September 1993.1 On the basis of analytical results, subsurface materials encountered, and professional interpretation, CEI found no evidence of a release of chlorinated compounds from the operations at the Ramsay site or evidence of a release of petroleum from the UST. CEI, therefore, did not recommend the installation of ground water monitor wells. After the July sampling event, CEI received additional instructions from Campbell, Arellano 85 Rich regarding the purpose and scope of the investigation, based upon the Fourth Amended Case Management Order and the commencement of negotiations for formation of the Tutu well field PRP group. CEI began participation in an informal technical committee and began to evaluate TEIC's proposal to construct monitoring well MW-15 on the Ramsay property as part of the final phase of field work for the RI. Because CEI recommended against installation of monitoring wells and TEIC is planning installation of a monitor well on the Ramsay property, Phase III was eliminated. Geraghty and Miller have recommended that monitoring well MW-15 be installed between the drum storage area and the Antilles Motors fence line on 1 CEI's analysis of Phase Two results was delayed pending an explanation by Enseco regarding the use of SW-846 Methods, rather than CLP-SOW as ordered by CEI. A copy of an explanation letter is included as Appendix II. the Ramsay property. If analyses of samples collected from this monitoring well reveal the presence of petroleum or chlorinated compounds, such results would be indicative of area-wide impact. Such results cannot be used to identify specific sources without additional investigative measures. This report is therefore intended to address the following issues: • whether or not a release occurred from the UST in Ramsay's service area, which was taken out of use in 1987. • analysis of the presence or absence of petroleum, petroleum constituents, or chlorinated hydrocarbons in site soils. • analysis of the magnitude and extent of impact by petroleum, petroleum constituents or chlorinated hydrocarbons, if present, in on-site soils. • analysis of the potential on-site impact of off-site activities by other facilities. • comparison of materials present in drums on-site with historical site operations and material present in the UST and soil samples. This information is being submitted to assist the technical subcommittee's completion of the RI/FS by providing a definition of petroleum and other constituents in the soil in the Ramsay Motors property. Additionally, this report may provide the secondary benefit in assisting with the allocation and de minimus subcommittee in evaluating Ramsay's potential responsibility. At the request of the PRP group, CEI submitted a preliminary draft of this Site Assessment Report directly to Geraghty & Miller on November 8, 1993, so as to allow review prior to completion of the draft recommendations for completion of theRI. 1.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS CEI reviewed previous environmental investigation reports prepared by Geraghty and Miller and others (see Appendix I), conducted field environmental sampling, and compared the analytical results of CEI's and others activities. At Ramsay Motors, CEI and others found evidence of hydrocarbon constituents including BTEX and PAHs in soils below the service area surrounding the closed in-place underground storage tank (UST) and site soils, consistent with car repair activities. CEI found no evidence that operations at the Ramsay Motors facility impacted ground water quality or caused migration of contaminants to off-site soils or ground water. CEI conducted two field investigations, one in April 1993, and a second activity in July 1993. With the exception of samples collected from below the service area in a small area surrounding the UST, analyses of site soils collected during these investigations indicated low levels of petroleum related volatile hydrocarbon constituents2, ranging between non-detect and 0.03 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Analysis of soil samples collected near the UST indicated the presence of somewhat higher concentrations of petroleum related volatile hydrocarbon constituents, ranging from 0.57 to 3.4 mg/kg. In the July site sampling activity analyses, all samples analyzed showed non- detect petroleum related hydrocarbon constituents. Semi-volatile analyses were also conducted on the sampled site soils during the two sampling activities. These analyses showed petroleum related semi-VOAs3 for the entire site ranging between 0.05 mg/kg and 2.6 mg/kg for the April, 1993 sampling activity. The analytical results for the July field activities for the entire site ranged between non-detect and 6.5 mg/kg for the same parameter. During the April 1993 sampling activities, several soil borings were advanced by hand in the service area. The concrete shop floor was cored, and 2 Petroleum related volatile hydrocarbon constituents were considered to be benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, (BTEX) and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) 3 Petroleum related semi-VOAs were considered to be polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) the hand augers were advanced to depths up to five feet. Below the concrete, subsurface materials consisted of one half to one foot thick layer of sand and gravel, and clays were encountered below the sand and gravel layer down to refusal. The sand and gravel appeared wet and oil stained, while the clays appeared slightly moist and unstained. In several of the borings in the service area, liquids seeped from the sand and gravel layer into the previously dry hole. An oily layer with the appearance of used oil was observed within a short period of time floating on a column of water in these bore holes. The liquids were analyzed separately for aqueous and non aqueous phase liquids, which confirmed the materials were consistent with shop operations. Analytical results of soil samples collected from near the UST indicated petroleum related hydrocarbon constituents ranged from non-detect to 0.31 mg/kg. These analyses showed petroleum related semi-VOA for the tank area ranged between 0.05 mg/kg and 2.6 mg/kg. From the appearance of the unstained clay soils and the perched water above the clays, CEI's field observations indicated that the oily material seeped from fissures and cracks in the concrete, and not from releases from the tank. Analysis of soil and oily liquids collected from soil borings generally indicated non-detect levels of chlorinated solvents, other than suspected laboratory contaminants. One surface soil sample obtained from a location upgradient of Ramsay operational areas and adjacent to the LAGA fence line (HB10-SRE) contained a trace level of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) of 4 micrograms per kilogram (pig/kg). This chemical (1,1,1-TCA) is consistent with MSDS reports of the contents for rusted drums disposed on a hillside above the Ramsay property. The soil sample collected at 1.25 feet below grade from boring HB7 was re-analyzed by the laboratory as a diluted sample (HB7-1.25 DL). Analysis of this diluted sample indicated trace levels (4 ng/kg) of 1,1,1- TCA. The reported concentration was an estimated value and was also detected in an associated laboratory blank. Therefore, evaluation of site analytical data indicated no releases of chlorinated substances have occurred as a result of Ramsay Motors operations. In the second sampling event in July 1993, additional soil borings were hand augered around the south area of the Ramsay property and the used motor oil drums were sampled. The laboratory analyses indicated that the highest concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons found on site during both the April and July 1993 sampling events were adjacent to the Antilles Motors facility along the south side of the property. Surface stains also were observed originating on Antilles property extending onto Ramsay property. Therefore, operations by Consolidated Auto Parts, Thomas Gassett, G.S. Industries, Inc., TAG Industries, Inc. and Antilles Motors impacted Ramsay property. During the July 1993 site visit, CEI collected samples of the materials stored in drums at the site for characterization by physical observations and chemical analyses. CEI proposed to sample the drums in four groupings on the basis of physical observation of the material and labeling of the drums. CEI collected composite samples from each of the four groups of drums. Laboratory analysis revealed the presence of BTEX and PAHs which is consistent with site operations. Chlorinated compounds, namely 1,1,1 - trichloroethane and tetrachloroethene, were found during analysis of the drum samples. The detection of these compounds is not consistent with site operations. The presence of these compounds in the drums is most likely the result of others using these drums to store materials containing these compounds prior to their purchase by Ramsay. This conclusion is based upon a review of Ramsay operational practices, the absence of the chlorinated compounds in environmental samples collected around the drum storage area, the analytical results of previous UST sampling conducted by NUS and CDM which failed to detect chlorinated compounds, and the absence of chlorinated compounds from the oily layer in borings surrounding the UST. The absence of chlorinated compounds in environmental samples around the drum pad indicates that there have been no releases to site soils from the storage drums. CEI's results were consistent with the analytical results for samples of site soils and liquids in the UST collected by NUS, CDM, and Weston for EPA and the results for soil samples collected near the drum pads by TEIC. With the exception of a sample collected from boring B-3 by TEIC, analysis of these samples did not indicate the presence of chlorinated solvents other than suspected laboratory artifacts. A trace level of tetrachloroethene (Spg/kg) was detected in a sample collected by TEIC from boring B-3 which was located approximately 70 feet from the area of operations. TEIC has concluded in its Technical Memorandum II that "individual parameter concentrations below 10 parts per billion [10 ppb] in soil samples are probably due to adsorption and incorporation of soil gas containing VOCs in the soil sample" (Geraghty and Miller, 1993). The detection of such concentrations, therefore, is not necessarily indicative of a nearby release. 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This section provides background information regarding the site and the surrounding area. 2.1 Site Location The site is located in east-central portion of the Island of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands as shown in the general location map included as Figure 1. The area surrounding the site is known as Tutu. The site can be located on the 7.5 minute U.S. Geological Survey topographic map for eastern St. Thomas. An excerpt of this and the central St. Thomas topographic map are included as Figure 2. The site is located at approximately 18° 20' 30" north latitude and 64° 53' 15" west longitude. Figure 3 is a general map of the Tutu area. Figure 3 indicates the location of businesses, residences, water supply wells, monitor wells and other features. 2.2 Site Description The Ramsay Motors facility is utilized for the sale, renting/leasing, maintenance and repair of automobiles. Figure 4 is a site map for the Ramsay Motors facility and illustrates its main features. Structures at the site include a 1400 square-foot office building, a 2500 square-foot automobile repair building, a 1300 square-foot leasing office, a 400 square-foot storage shed, a 500 square-foot storage shed, a water supply well, and an above-ground storage tank associated with water supply well. The square footage indicated are approximate. The buildings are one-story structures constructed of cinder blocks, wood, and concrete. 8 The automobile repair building is a three-walled structure with the west side of the building open. A covered concrete pad on the south end of the building is used for the storage of drums containing used automobile crankcase oil. An out of service underground storage tank (UST) is reported to be present under the concrete building floor along the east side of the building. The UST is reported to be constructed of concrete block and mortar and its exact dimensions and location are not known. 2.3 Site and Area Topography Figure 2 illustrates the general topography of the area which is steep, with slopes commonly exceeding 35 degrees. The topography at the Ramsay Motors facility and along Turpentine Run is much gentler, with slopes of 1 to 3 percent. The elevation of the Ramsay Motors facility is approximately 190 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Crests of hills within 2000 feet of the site rise to over 400 feet above MSL. Drainage in the area is conveyed to the south into Mangrove Lagoon and the Caribbean Sea by Turpentine Run, an incised stream course. Although Turpentine Run is the largest stream on St. Thomas, it is reported to be an intermittent stream (Ward and Jordan, 1963). 2.4 Site History The site was purchased from Rudy & Yvonne D'Angelico in May 1978 and Ramsay commenced operations in September 1978. Building plans and anecdotal information from area residents indicates that the service building and UST were constructed by prior owners, sometime before 1978. The site was once part of a larger group of properties in the Anna's Retreat area that was owned by Co-Build Companies, Inc., f/k/a West Indies Enterprises Inc., a building contractor. Other area properties once owned by Co-Build or West Indies include the Antilles Automotive site; the former LAGA knit mill, now occupied by the Government of the Virgin Islands, Department of Education; and the Virgin Islands Housing Authority site, formerly occupied by Tropical Motors. 2.5 Previous Investigation Activities Investigations have been previously conducted at the Ramsay facility by Weston/Sper Division (Weston), NUS Corporation (NUS) and CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM) on behalf of the USEPA in 1987, 1988 and 1989, respectively. Additionally, TEIC performed investigation activities at the site in 1992. Weston collected a sample of the material in the Ramsay UST on August 17, 1987. Analysis of this sample indicated the presence of BTEX compounds, but not chlorinated solvents. The detection of BTEX compounds in this material is consistent with site operations. Weston's findings are summarized in a report titled Summary of Laboratory Results for Oil and Water Samples Collected from Tank. Storm Drains, and Auto Body Shops in St. Thomas. U. S. Virgin Islands on August 17. 1987. The report is dated February 23, 1988. In September 1988, CDM collected soil samples and a ground water sample from the Ramsay site. The exact locations of the soil samples are not known to CEI and the ground water sample was presumably collected from the site water supply well. Analytical results for the soil samples indicated the presence of BTEX compounds. The maximum concentration of total BTEX was 0.031 mg/kg. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) were also detected in the two soil samples. The maximum detected TPH concentration was 1.98 mg/kg. The detection of these compounds is consistent with site operations. No chlorinated compounds were detected in the soil samples. Analysis of the ground water sample indicated the presence of 11 micrograms per liter (Mg/1) tetrachloroethane. No other compounds were detected in the ground water sample. The analytical results for these samples are summarized in letters dated February 16, 1989 and April 14, 1989 from CDM to Ms. Caroline Kwan of USEPA. In February 1989, NUS visited the site and performed a Potential Hazardous Waste Site Preliminary Assessment which is summarized in a report titled Final Draft. Preliminary Assessment Ramsay Motors dated March 24, 1989. The NUS report documented the presence of BTEX compounds, but no 10 chlorinated compounds in soils at the site. The presence of BTEX compounds is consistent with site operations. The NUS report documented the presence of tetrachlorethane in ground water at the site. The report indicated that "...ground water in the entire area is contaminated, and therefore, the tetrachloroethane may or may not be associated with this site." Regarding the UST at the site, the NUS report stated, "There is no information that the tank is leaking; therefore there is little potential for contaminant migration to air, ground water, or surface water." The NUS report also documented that waste oil was discharging onto the Ramsay Motors property from the adjacent Gassett Motors property. NUS concluded that, "The likelihood of a release of contaminants to the ground water from the waste units on site is small." In June 1989, CDM collected a sample of the material in the UST at the site. Analysis of this sample indicated the presence of BTEX compounds, but no chlorinated compounds. The concentration of total BTEX in the sample was reported to be 1,844 mg/kg. The presence of BTEX compounds in this sample is consistent with site operations. The results are summarized in letters dated January 31, 1990 and February 16, 1990 from CDM to Ms. Carolina Kwan of USEPA. On July 30 and August 3, 1992, Geraghty 85 Miller on behalf of TEIC advanced two soil boring designated B-2 and B-3. Soil borings B-2 and B-3 were completed approximately 20 feet south and 70 feet southwest of the automobile repair building at the Ramsay Property, respectively. Analysis of samples collected from these borings did not indicate the presence of BTEX compounds. Petroleum related semi-VOAs (PAHs) were detected in quantifiable but estimated concentrations of 0.56 mg/kg in the sample from boring B-2. The presence of petroleum related semi-VOAs is consistent with site operations. TPH was detected in samples collected from the two borings. Geraghty & Miller concludes that these results may be false-positive results. Analysis of the sample from boring B-3 indicated an estimated concentration of tetrachloroethene of 6 Mg/kg. The presence of tetrachloroethene is not consistent with site operations. Moreover, Geraghty & Miller concludes that "the detection of low levels of VOCs (i.e., individual parameter concentrations below 10 parts per billion [ppb]) in soil samples are probably due to adsorption and incorporation of soil gas containing VOCs in the soil sample." TEIC's 11 findings are summarized in a report titled, Technical Memorandum II - Results of the Field Program. Tutu Service Station Investigation. St. Thomas. U. S. Virgin Islands dated May 1993. 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES This section describes the field activities conducted by CEI during two site visits in April 1993 and July 1993. 3.1 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in April 1993 This section describes the methodology used for UST pad decontamination, concrete core drilling, equipment decontamination, soil sampling, and liquid sampling conducted during the April 1993 site visit. 3.1.1 UST Pad Decontamination The concrete pad in the general vicinity of used oil UST was decontaminated using a steam cleaner. Water was supplied to the steam cleaner from the Ramsay Motors water supply well after the water was treated by two granular activated carbon (GAC) filters aligned in a parallel configuration. Water produced by the steam cleaning process was collected by an industrial wet/dry vacuum cleaner. The concrete surface areas in the immediate vicinity of selected soil boring locations were further decontaminated. These areas were scrubbed with a nylon bristle brush using a liquinox soap and water solution. The soap and water solution was collected with an industrial wet/dry vacuum cleaner. After the concrete pad had been decontaminated, eight-foot lengths of two by four wooden studs stacked two high were placed along the perimeter of the area. Plastic sheeting with a thickness of 6 mils was then draped over the wooden studs to form a closed depression and to form an exclusion zone for health and safety purposes. 12 3.1.2 Concrete Core Drilling Soil borings HB-1 through HB-7 were advanced in areas covered by concrete. The locations of these borings are shown in Figure 4. At these boring locations, the concrete was penetrated using an electric coring machine equipped with a 4-inch diameter diamond core bit. Water was supplied from the Ramsay water supply well to the coring machine to cool and lubricate the bit. The water was treated by GAC filters. Water produced during the coring operation was continually collected with an industrial wet/dry vacuum cleaner. 3.1.3 Equipment Decontamination The diamond core bit was decontaminated prior to initiation of each core hole by steam cleaning. Water used for steam cleaning was treated by GAC filters. Down hole drilling and sampling equipment were decontaminated prior to advancing each bore hole. Auger flights for a hand-held power auger were steam cleaned. A stainless steel hand auger for both drilling and sampling was decontaminated by steam cleaning and rinsing in sequence with isopropyl alcohol and distilled bottled water. 3.1.4 Soil Sampling At each soil sampling location, a decontaminated hand auger was advanced into the soil. Soil samples locations are indicated in Figure 4. If it became difficult to advance the hand auger to desired sampling depths, the hand-held power auger was employed to advance the soil boring. Once the desired sampling depth was reached or difficult drilling was encountered, soil samples were collected. Samples were collected using either a hand auger or a stainless steel spoon to scrape soil from the inside of the borehole at a specific sampling depth. Once a sample was retrieved from a borehole, it was split into two duplicate samples. One of the two duplicates was placed in sample containers provided by Enseco Laboratories and was then immediately labeled and placed in a cooler chilled with ice to approximately 4 degrees Celsius. The other 13 duplicate was placed in zipper-lock sandwich bag and allowed to approach vapor equilibrium conditions for approximately ten minutes in a shaded area. The probe of the flame ionization detector was then inserted into the bag and the reading was recorded. The FID was calibrated daily to a 100 parts per million-volume methane standard. The samples contained in the zipper-lock sandwich bags were also analyzed in the field for BTEX using immunoassay techniques developed by Quantix. The samples which were placed in the cooler were retained and kept chilled until sampling was complete. These samples were then shipped to Enseco Laboratories in Somerset, New Jersey for analysis. Chain of Custody procedures were followed for each sample submitted for laboratory analyses after collection. 3.1.5 Liquid Sampling Liquids accumulated in soil boring HB-3 and were sampled. Sampling was performed by inserting a polypropylene "Colawassa" drum sampler into the borehole, sealing the air hole at the top of the sampler, and then withdrawing the sampler from the borehole. The liquids contained in the sampler were then transferred to sample containers provided by Enseco Laboratories. Water used for decontamination and coring was sampled at the effluent of the GAC filters at the conclusion of field activities. Samples were collected in containers provided by Enseco Laboratories. Liquid samples were placed in a cooler chilled with ice to approximately 4 degrees Celsius. Samples were retained until completion of field activities and were then shipped to Enseco Laboratories for analysis. Copies of analytical summaries for these liquid samples are included in Appendix III. 3.2 Methodology for Field Activities Conducted in July 1993 This section describes equipment decontamination, soil sampling, and drum sampling conducted during the July 1993 site visit. 14 3.2.1 Equipment Decontamination Prior to advancing each hand augered boring the stainless steel hand auger was decontaminated. The hand auger was decontaminated by first brushing the auger with bottled distilled water. The auger was then washed in an Alconox solution followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and triple rinsed with bottled distilled water. The decontamination fluids were contained into an empty 55-gallon drum located on the drum storage pad. The hand auger was then allowed to air dry. 3.2.2 Soil Sampling CEI personnel established a grid pattern within a 50 feet by 50 feet area along an unnamed storm ditch separating Anchilles Motors and Ramsay Motors. Several obstructions altered or changed the size of each grid. At each grid node, a decontaminated hand auger was advanced into the soil. The grid nodes are designated "SB" in Figure 4. If the auguring physically became too difficult to advance further, a sample was collected and the depth measured with a yard stick. Once the soil sample was retrieved from the sampling location, it was split into two duplicate samples. One of the duplicates was placed in an Enseco laboratories sample container, sealed, secured, and labeled for identification, place in an iced cooler to be chilled to approximately 4 degrees Celsius. The remainder of the sample was placed in a reseable zipper lock sandwich bag and allowed to reach vapor equilibrium conditions. Measurements were collected similar to that described in Section 3.1.4. The soil samples were shipped via Federal Express to Enseco Laboratories in Somerset, New Jersey for analysis. Chain of Custody procedures were followed for each sample submitted for laboratory analysis. 15 3.2.3 Drum Sampling The drums were labeled and each drum investigated for amount and type of fluids prior to sampling. Drums were then segregated into four groups on the basis of labels and initial physical characterization of material stored in the drum. A "Colawassa" sampler was lowered to the bottom of each drum in each group drum, the air hole at the top of the sampler was then sealed with an attached polypropylene cap, and then the sampler was withdrawn. Fluids from each drum sampler from each group were collected in a 200 milliliter (ml) graduated glass measuring cup. Several drum samples were composited together in the measuring cup. Composite samples were mixed with a stainless steel spoon and decanted in Enseco Laboratory bottles. The spoon was decontaminated along with the 200 ml measuring cup following similar decontamination procedures used for the hand auger. However, additional brushing and washing was needed to remove residual oil from the glass measuring cup. The disposable sampler was cut in half and secured in a 55- gallon drum along with the rinse water. Once the samples were collected the containers were labeled and secured in a cooler chilled to approximately 4 degrees Celsius. 4.0 INVESTIGATION FINDINGS This section summarizes the findings of this investigation. 4.1 Soil Chemical Quality Data Soil samples collected by CEI during the April 14 through 19, 1993 site visit were screened in the field for the presence of organic vapors using a flame ionization detector (FID). Additionally, CEI screened the head space in the borings after covering them with plastic sheeting and allowing equilibrium conditions to be approached. The FID field screening results are summarized in Table 1. Figure 4 indicates the locations of soil borings. The FID reading ranged from zero (0) to 3800 parts per million-volume (ppm-v). The 3800 ppm-v reading was obtained during screening of the 16 borehole for hand augered boring HB-4. The highest reading obtained for screening of soil samples collected at discrete depths was 400 ppm-v for a sample collected at 3 feet below grade in hand boring HB-3. Soil samples collected during the April 1993 site visit were screened for the presence of BTEX compounds using an immunoassay technique developed by Quantix. The immunoassay field screening results are summarized in Table 2. The results indicate BTEX was not detected in the samples collected during this site visit other than of 4.5 ppm total BTEX in the sample collected from hand augered boring HB-8 at 2 feet below grade. CEI submitted selected soil samples collected during the April 14 through 19, 1993 site visit for laboratory analysis for volatile organic analytes (VOAs), semi-volatile organic analytes (semi-VOAs), and total petroleum hydrocarbons. The VOA and semi-VOA analysis was performed in accordance with USEPA's Contract Laboratory Program - Statement of Work (CLP-SOW) and the TPH analysis was performed using infrared detection and quantification techniques in accordance with the Army Corps of Engineers Method. CEI prepared Table 3, which summarizes the data for positive detection of target analytes for each sample collected. Appendix III contains copies of laboratory summaries for the sample analyses. Additional QA/QC information is on file at CEI. Table 3 provides concentration values for the summation of the concentrations of detected VOAs and semi-VOAs. CEI also summed the number of tentatively identified compounds (TICs) and their estimated concentrations for VOAs and semi-VOAs as indicated in Table 3. CEI prepared Table 4 as an overall summary of the analyses of the soil samples collected April 14 through 19, 1993. Tables 4 omits some of the detail provided in Table 3, such as contract laboratory reporting limits and laboratory qualifiers, but provides a two-page summary of the analytical results for samples collected during this period. As indicated by Table 3 and 4, concentrations of VOAs ranged from 5 micrograms per kilogram (pg/kg) for a sample collected from boring HB-8 at a depth of 2 feet to 3,400 Mg/kg for a sample collected from boring HB4 at a depth of 2.5 feet. The maximum concentration of VOAs (3,400 Mg/kg) was 17 detected in a sample which required dilution due to the presence of high concentrations of target analytes. The concentrations of petroleum-related VOAs (BTEX and MTBE) ranged from below detection limits for several samples to 1,194 Mg/kg for a sample collected from boring HB2 at 4.5 feet below grade. The concentration of semi-VOAs ranged from 5lug/kg for a sample collected from HB7 at 1.25 feet to 3,050 Mg/kg for a sample collected from boring HB5 at 2.3 feet. The concentration of petroleum related semi-VOAs (PAHs) ranged from below laboratory detection limits for a sample collected from boring HB7 at 1.25 feet to 2580 Mg/kg for a sample collected from boring HB5 at 2.3 feet. The maximum concentration of semi-VOAs and petroleum related semi-VOAs were detected in a sample which required dilution due to the presence of high concentrations of target analytes. As indicated by Tables 3 and 4, 1,1,1-trichloroethane was detected in estimated concentrations (4 Mg/kg) in a surface sample from boring HB10 and in a diluted sample collected at a depth of 1.25 feet below grade in boring HB7. Analysis of laboratory blanks associated with these samples also indicated the presence of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. With the exception of methylene chloride, which is a common laboratory contaminant, no other chlorinated compounds were detected in soil samples collected during the April 1993 sampling event. CEI prepared Table 5 which summarizes data for positive detection of target analytes for each soil sample collected during the July 1 through 5, 1993 site visit. Appendix IV contains copies of laboratory summaries for the sample analyses. Appendix II contains correspondence from the laboratory regarding the difference between the SW-846 methods used on samples collected during the July 1993 site visit and the CLP-SOW methods used on samples collected during the April 1993 site visit. Additional QA/QC information is on file at CEI. Hand augered borings advanced during this visit were given the designator "SB" and are shown in Figure 4. Table 6 is an overall summary of the analyses of the samples collected during the July 1 to 5, 1993 site visit. Table 6 omits some of the detail included in Table 5, such as laboratory reporting limits and laboratory qualifiers, but provides a one-page summary of the analytical results for samples collected during this period. 18 As indicated by Tables 5 and 6, the concentrations of VOAs were below detection limits in 7 of 8 soil samples collected during the July sampling event. Analysis of the sample from boring SB9 indicated the presence of 162.3 Mg/kg VOAs. Of the 162.3 Mg/kg total VOAs detected, 2.3 Mg/kg was methylene chloride and 160 Mg/kg was acetone, both of which are considered to be common laboratory contaminants (USEPA, 1989). The concentration of semi- VOAs ranged from 44 Mg/kg in a sample from boring SB4 to 7,600 Mg/kg in a. sample collected from boring SB3. The concentration of petroleum related semi-VOAs (PAHs) was below laboratory detection limits in 4 of the 8 soil samples. The maximum concentration of petroleum related semi-VOAs was 6,490 Mg/kg for a sample collected from boring SB3. As indicated by Tables 5 and 6, no chlorinated compounds were detected in soil samples collected during the July 1993 sampling event with the exception of methylene chloride, a common laboratory contaminant. Methylene chloride was detected in an estimated concentration of 2.3 Mg/kg in the sample from soil boring SB9. 4.2 Characterization of Oil/Water Mixture Encountered in the Service Area Liquid accumulated in hand auger boring HB3 and HB5 during the April 1993 sampling event. CEI encountered sand and gravel beneath the concrete floor at this boring location from a depth of 0.5 to 1.0 feet. Clays were encountered from 1.0 to 5.0 feet below grade. The clays appeared moist but not wet and were not stained. The unstained appearance is critical, since CEI concluded that if a release occurred at the tank, and oil flooded to the surface, the clay between the release point and the surface would appear stained. Since CEI did not observe staining, the liquids appear to seep from the sand and gravel down into the bore hole and resulted from subsurface cracks and joints in the shop floor. CEI collected a sample of the liquids from hand augered boring HB3 which appeared to be in non-aqueous and aqueous phases. The sample was designated HB3-L. After submitting the sample to and consulting with the laboratory, it was decided to analyze the two phases separately. The non- 19 aqueous phase was decanted and designated HBS-L-Oil and the remaining aqueous phase was designated HB3-L-Water. The analytical results for these samples are summarized in Table 7. Appendix III contains copies of laboratory summaries for the sample analyses. Additional QA/QC information is on file at CEI. As indicated in Table 7 and as expected on the basis of the physical characteristics of the non-aqueous phase fluids present, the compounds detected are typically associated with petroleum hydrocarbons. No chlorinated compounds were detected. Analysis of the non-aqueous phase liquid sample (HB3-L-oil) indicated the presence of 5,858,000 micrograms per liter (Mg/1); total VOAs; 5,319,000 Mg/1 petroleum related VOAs; 2,429 Mg/1 semi-VOAs; and 2,121 Mg/1 petroleum related semi-VOAs. Analysis of the aqueous phase liquid sample (HB3-L-water) indicated the presence of 7,350 Mg/1 total VOAs; 6,940 Mg/1 petroleum related VOAs; 8,830 Mg/1 total semi-VOAs; and 6,790 Mg/1 petroleum related semi- VOAs. 4.3 Characterization of Material Stored in Drums Table 8 summarizes data for positive detection of target analytes noted during analyses of the drum samples. Table 9 is an overall summary table for the drum samples collected during the July 1 through 5, 1993 site visit. Table 9 omits some of the detail included in Table 8 such as laboratory reporting limits and laboratory qualifiers, but provides a one-page summary of the analytical results for the samples of the material stored in the drums. In addition to the expected petroleum related hydrocarbon constituents (BTEX, MTBE, and PAHs), two chlorinated compounds (1,1,1-trichloroethane and tetrachloroethlene) were detected in samples of the material stored in the drums. Appendix IV contains copies of laboratory summaries for the sample analyses. The concentrations of total VOAs ranged from 2,290,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 3 to 4,729,000 for drum sample 4. The concentration of petroleum- related VOAs ranged from 2,300,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 3 to 4,199,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 4. The concentration of total semi VOAs ranged from 20 1,232,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 3 to 2,308,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 1. The concentration of petroleum related semi-VOAs ranged from 1,072,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 3 to 2,178,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 1. The concentration of TPH ranged from 280,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 2 to 320,000 Mg/kg for drum sample 3. 5.0 INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS CEI has reviewed and interpreted investigation data. The areal distribution of various compounds in soil are illustrated in the isoconcentration maps presented as Figures 5 through 7. As shown in the isoconcentration map for petroleum hydrocarbon related VOAs (BTEX & MTBE) included as Figure 5, such compounds appear concentrated under the concrete pad in the service area of the automobile repair area. Visual observations of soil staining indicate free-phase product is limited to 0.5-foot thick sand and gravel layer located beneath the concrete floor and above tight clays. The presence of clays limits the vertical migration of the free-phase product. Such compounds were not detected in the upgradient boring (HB10), the borings along the southern portion of the site adjacent to Antilles Motors, or in the boring northwest of the UST (HB6). As shown on the isoconcentration maps for petroleum related semi- VOAs (PAHs) and TPH and included as Figures 6 and 7, impact by the compounds along the southern Ramsay property boundary may be originating from off-site at Antilles Motors. These compounds are commonly associated with used motor oils. The compounds also appear to be concentrated in the vicinity of the UST. The configuration of the contours also indicate that petroleum related semi-VOAs impacting the area in the vicinity of hand augered boring HB-10 may be originating from off-site on the LAGA property. Boring HB-10 was advanced upgradient of Ramsay operational areas and downgradient of an area on the LAGA property where drums were noted to have been improperly disposed. MSDS sheets documenting the contents of these drums indicate the presence of 1,1,1-trichloroethane, VOAs, and semi- VOAs commonly associated with petroleum. 21 An isolated area of moderately low impact by TPH and petroleum hydrocarbon related semi-VOAs was identified by CEI in the vicinity of boring HB-6. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS On the basis of analysis of laboratory data and site information, soils at the site received minor impact by compounds typically associated with petroleum hydrocarbons such as gasoline and used crankcase oils. Although these compounds are consistent with those used by Ramsay in their automotive maintenance and repair operations, activities at the adjacent Antilles Motors in the past and possibly at this time have contributed to these on-site impacts. The specific activities are most likely improper storage, handling, and disposal of used motor oils at the Antilles facility. Used motor oil discovered below the concrete floor in the vicinity of the UST most likely resulted from seepage of oils through cracks and fissures in the shop floor as opposed to a release from the UST. This conclusion is based upon physical observations of the subsurface materials including the absence of oil staining in clays below a depth of 1.0 feet; field screening results; and laboratory results. The oils discovered in boring near the UST are most likely the result of incidental spillage on the shop area. The clays in the vicinity of the UST limit rapid vertical migration of the oil into the underlying bedrock aquifer. With the exception of a sample collected from boring HB10 and a diluted sample from boring HB7 and suspect laboratory contaminants, no chlorinated compounds were detected in soil or fluid samples collected by CEI from borings on site. The compound 1,1,1-trichloroethane detected in the sample from boring HB-10 is similar to material previously stored in corroded drums on a hillside above boring HB-10 on the Department of Education property. The concentration of 1,1,1-trichloroethane detected in the diluted sample from boring HB7 was estimated and the compound was also detected in an associated laboratory blank. The presence of this compound in this sample is therefore suspect. 22 Chlorinated compounds, namely 1,1,1-trichloroethane and tetrachloroethene, were detected in samples of materials collected from the drums on-site. CEI would expect to have detected these compounds in soil samples collected around the drum storage area had a release occurred from the drums. Furthermore, since these compounds have similar transport properties (Fetter, 1988; Olsen and Davis, 1990), CEI would expect that it is not possible for only one of the compounds to impact ground water if a release occurred. Tetrachloroethene, but not 1,1,1-trichloroethane, has been detected at or above laboratory detection limits in deeper water supply well samples collected by TEIC and others. Additionally, no chlorinated compounds were detected in soil and non-aqueous phase samples from soil borings surrounding the UST or in samples of the UST contents sampled by others in the late 1980s. On this basis, CEI concludes that a release of the materials in the drums has not occurred and that PAHs detected in soils around the drum storage area has resulted from minor dripping and spilling of oils when transferring oil to drums. The water supply well at the Ramsay site has been impacted by a source other than the operations at the site. As discussed in the previous paragraph, if a release of the materials stored in drums at the site occurred and caused impact to underlying ground water by tetrachloroethene, then CEI would also expect impact by 1,1,1-trichloroethane since these compounds have similar transport properties. Since this is not the case and since no evidence of chlorinated compounds were detected in soil samples around the drum storage area, CEI concludes that operations at the drum storage area have not caused impact to the Ramsay water supply well by chlorinated compounds. Furthermore, CEI concludes that operations in the vicinity of the drum storage pad and the UST have not caused impact to the Ramsay Water Supply well by petroleum compounds. This conclusion is based upon transport properties of the compounds involved. Petroleum related VOAs and semi-VOAs were detected in soils near the UST and drum storage pad, liquids in the UST, and in boreholes near the UST. Of the specific compounds detected, benzene is considered to be highly mobile (Letter, 1989) and MTBE is considered to be even more mobile than benzene (Garrett, et al, 1985). If a release of petroleum occurred and caused impact to the water supply well, CEI would expect benzene and MTBE to be present in the water supply well. A review of the historical analytical results contained in TEIC's Sixth Quarterly Sampling 23 Report of August 1992 did not indicate the presence of these compounds in samples collected from the water supply well nor is CEI aware of these compounds being present in earlier samples from the water supply well. If TEIC completes a monitor well south of the automotive repair building on Ramsay property, it is likely that non-detect to low levels of petroleum related VOAs and semi-VOAs will be detected in surface soil samples collected during well installation. If low levels of the compounds are detected in surface samples, it is likely that there will be a decreasing concentration trend with depth for analysis of additional samples. Analysis of ground water samples collected from the proposed monitor well are likely to indicate the presence of various VOAs and semi VOAs. The presence of such compounds are likely to be the result of current and previous off-site activities such as those at Antilles Motors, Texaco, LAGA, and possibly other locations due to their proximity to the Ramsay property and ground water flow patterns. CEI found no evidence of impact to on or off-site ground waters, or on or off-site soils which resulted from operations at the Ramsay facility. 7.0 REFERENCES Lists of background documents reviewed by CEI are included as Appendix I. In addition, CEI utilized the following references: Fetter, C.W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology, Second Edition: Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio, 592 pp. Fetter, C.W., 1993, Contaminant Hydrogeology: MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, 458 pp. Garrett, P., Moreau, M., and Lowry, J. D., 1985, MTBE as a Ground Water Contaminant in proceeding of the NWWA/API Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water Prevention, Detection and Restoration: November 1986; pp 227-237. 24 Olsen, R.L. and Davis, A.; May/June 1990, Predicting the Fate and Transport of Organic Compounds in Ground water, Part 1 in HMC: 64 pp. Olsen, R. L. and Davis, A., July/August 1990, Predicting the Fate of Organic Compounds, Part 2 in HMC, 37 pp. kate\c: \winword\joe\jnl35A 25 TABLES u».<: 1 TAl SUMMARY OF FLAME IONIZATION DETECTOR FIELD SCREENING RESULTS APRIL 14 -19, 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 1.1 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 0.0-0.75 BOREHOLE HB-1 FID READING (ppm-v) NFS 90 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 2.75 4.50 BOREHOLE HB-2 FID READING (ppm-v) 390 240 100 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 3.00 BOREHOLE HB-3 FID READING (ppm-v) 400 290 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 0.5-1.0 2.50 BOREHOLE HB-4 FID READING (ppm-v) 20 150 3800 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 2.25 BOREHOLE HB-5 FID READING (ppm-v) 400 5 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 1.5 BOREHOLE HB-6 FID READING (ppm-v) NFS 10 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 1.25 BOREHOLE HB-7 FID READING (ppm-v) 48 1500 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 1.00 2.00 BOREHOLE HB-8 FID READING (ppm-v) 0 NFS 0 BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 0.0- 1.0 BOREHOLE HB-9 FID READING (ppm-v) NFS NFS BORING ID: DEPTH (FEET) 0.0- 0.5 BOREHOLE HB-10 FID READING (ppm-v) NFS NFS FID - FLAME IONIZATION DETECTOR ppm-v - PARTS PER MILLION - VOLUME NFS - NOT FIELD SCREENED. SHADING INDICATES SAMPLE WAS SUBMITTED FOR ADDITIONAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS. BOREHOLES WERE SCREENED AFTER COVERING AND ALLOWING THEM TO EQUILIBRATE. TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF QUANTIX IMMUNOASSAY FIELD SCREENING RESULTS APRIL 14-19. 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 2.1 BORING NUMBER HB-1 HB-2 HB-3 HB-4 HB-5 HB-6 HB-7 HB-8 HB-9 HB-10 DEPTH (FEET) NS 4.5 3 2.5 2.3 1.5 1.25 2 SURFACE SURFACE OOftNTXX (ppm; NS <3.5 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5 4.5 <7.0 <7.0 ppm - PARTS PER MILLION NS - NOT SAMPLED TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.1 SAMPLE NO: HB2-4.5 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRATION CRQL (UGACGI IUG/KGI 11 500 ND 61 39 ND 61 17 290 7 880 480 2,224 1,194 10 4,250 QUALIFIERS J B U BJ U J J SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (Kl FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 110 140 75 ND 85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 82 ND ND ND ND ND 492 410 17 11,029 CONCENTRATION IM6/KGI 990 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI J J J U J U U U U U U U J U U U U U 670 120 UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.2 VOAs SEMI- VOAs TPH SAMPLE NO: HB3-3.0 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULRDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION (UG/KGI ND 1,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND 410 210 1,620 410 9 1 1 ,660 ND 47 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 49 ND ND ND ND ND 96 47 5 10,537 CONCENTRATION IMG/KGI ND CRQL (UG/KGI 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 430 430 1000 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KG) 27 QUALIFIERS U BJ U BJ U U U U J J U J U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPBI MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.3 SAMPLE NO: HB4-2.5 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISU-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI 10 270 ND 35 ND ND ND ND 250 9.1 574.1 250 10 2,580 ND 130 93 ND 160 ND ND ND ND ND ND 43 51 ND ND ND ND ND 477 383 21 13,170 CONCENTRATION IMG/KCI 200 CRQL IUG/KGI 61 61 61 61 61 410 1000 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI 25 QUALIFIERS J B U BJ U U U U DJ J U J J U J U U U U U U J J U U U U U UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.4 SAMPLE NO: HB4-2.SDL VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI ND 1,500 ND 1.900 ND ND ND ND NA NA 3,400 0 5 5,180 CRQL fUG/KGI 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 QUALIFIERS U BD U D U U U U SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO (Bl FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENOd,2.3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA CONCENTRATION IMG/KGI REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KG) NA UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE. AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS • SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.5 VOAs SEMI- VOAs TPH SAMPLE NO: HBS-2.3 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISU-ETHYLHEXYL1PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION (UG/KGI ND 800 ND 1,000 ND ND 190 ND 490 380 2,860 680 4 4,210 610 920 170 ND 340 ND ND 51 210 ND ND 100 290 49 ND ND ND 67 2,807 2,417 21 10,500 CONCENTRATION IMG/KGI 1,800 CRQL (UG/KGI 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1000 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KG) 610 QUALIFIERS U BJ U J U J J J J J J U J U UJ J U J J J J U U U J UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.6 SAMPLE NO: HB5-2.3DL VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1 ,1 .1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.II PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION (UG/KGi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 910 1,200 ND ND 470 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 470 ND ND ND ND ND 3,050 2,580 3 6,850 CONCENTRATION IMG/KCI NA CRQL (UG/KGI 4200 10000 4200 4200 4200 4200 42OO 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI QUALIFIERS DJ DJ U U DJ U U U U U U U DJ U U U U U UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM: EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND • NOT DETECTED NA • NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USV1 CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.7 SAMPLE NO: HB6-1.5 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO IK) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION fUC/KGI 3 75 ND 11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 89 0 1 14 ND ND 46 ND 320 72 ND 390 430 ND 250 230 51 330 57 200 120 130 2,626 2,345 12 29,808 CONCENTRATION (MG/KGI 170 CRQL (UG/KGI 12 12 12 12 12 12 5.8 410 410 990 410 410 REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KGI 23 QUALIFIERS J B U BJ U U U U U U U UJ U J J U J U J J J J J J J J UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPBI MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM: EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J • COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE. 2-BUTANONE. AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.8 SAMPLE NO: HB7-1.2S VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIOE 2-BUTANONE 1 ,1 ,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRATION (UG/KGI 4 240 1 37 NO 2 ND ND 29 ND 313 31 2 62 CRQL IUG/KGI 12 12 12 5.9 QUALIFIERS J BE J B U J U U SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND 51 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 51 0 8 10.373 CONCENTRA TION (MG/KGI 67 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KGI 24 U U U J U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.9 SAMPLE NO: HB7-1.2SDL VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRA TION IUG/KG) 8 370 ND SB 4 ND ND ND NA NA 440 0 3 113 CRQL IUC/KGI 24 24 24 24 QUALIFIERS BDJ BD U BD BDJ U U U SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO IK) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CONCENTRATION (MG/KGI REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.10 SAMPLE NO: HB8-2 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI 2 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 0 0 0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 180 ND 120 150 84 200 70 110 58 77 1,229 995 4 11,534 CONCENTRATION fMG/KGI 24 CRQL (UG/KGI 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 5.9 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI 24 QUALIFIERS J BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J U J J J J J J J J UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.11 SAMPLE NO: HB10-S VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION tUG/KGI 3 7 NO NO NO NO ND ND ND ND 10 0 1 11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 97 ND ND 970 ND ND 190 ND ND ND ND 340 1,597 340 21 17,334 CONCENTRATION (MG/KGI 73 CRQL IUG/KGI 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 410 410 410 990 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 REPORTING LIMIT IMG/KGI 24 QUALIFIERS J BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U J U J U U J UG/KG • MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 3.12 SAMPLE NO: HB10-SRE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1,1 -TRICHLOROETH ANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI 6 6 ND 3 4 ND ND ND NA NA 19 0 2 48 CRQL IUG/KGI 12 12 12 12 QUALIFIERS BJ BJ U BJ BJ U U U SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYL(PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K> FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CONCENTRATION (MG/KGI REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KGI NA NA UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPBI MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA • NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92116 PAGE 4.1 SAMPLE ID VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON OISULFIDE 2 BUTANONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES MTBE N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAl TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TIC» SEMI- VOAs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLORO PHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE Dl N BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYLIPHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO IK) FLUORANTHENE BENZO IA) PYRENE INOENO 11.2.3-CD) PYRENE BENZO IG.H.II PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs i 3 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg t ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg f ug/kg HB2-4.5 11 500 ND 39 ND 17 290 7 880 480 2.224 1,194 10 4,250 110 140 75 ND 85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 82 ND ND ND NO ND 492 410 17 11,029 HB3-3.0 ND 1,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND 410 210 1,620 410 9 11,660 ND 47 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 49 ND ND ND ND ND 96 47 5 10,537 HB4-2.S 10 270 ND 35 ND ND ND ND 250 9.1 574.1 250 10 2,580 ND 130 93 ND 160 ND ND ND ND ND ND 43 51 ND ND ND ND ND 477 426 21 13,170 HB4-2.5DL ND 1,500 ND 1,900 ND ND ND ND NA NA 3.4OO 0 5 5,180 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA H85-2.3 ND 800 NO 1,000 ND ND 190 ND 490 380 2,860 680 4 4,210 610 920 170 ND 340 ND ND 51 210 ND ND 100 290 49 ND ND ND 67 2,807 2517 21 10.500 HB5-2.3DL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 910 1.200 ND ND 470 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 470 ND ND ND ND ND 3.050 2580 3 6.850 ini 3 75 ND 11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 89 0 1 14 ND ND 46 ND 320 72 ND 390 430 NO 250 230 51 330 57 200 120 130 2,626 2575 12 29,808 inN •-i 4 240 1 37 ND 2 ND ND 29 ND 313 31 2 62 ND ND ND 51 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 51 0 8 10,373 8 N | 8 370 ND 58 4 ND ND ND NA NA 440 0 3 113 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ni 2 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 0 0 0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 180 ND 120 150 84 200 70 110 58 77 1,229 1145 4 11.534 HB10-S 3 7 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 0 1 11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 97 ND ND 970 ND ND 190 ND ND ND ND 340 1.597 340 21 17.334 HB10-SRE 6 6 ND 3 4 ND ND ND NA NA 19 0 2 48 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TPH mg/kg 670 NO 200 NA 1,800 NA 170 67 NA 24 73 NA V -4 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS • SOIL SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 4.2 NOTES FOR TABLE 4 UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) CRQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J • COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. SLA - SUSPECT LABORATORY ARTIFACTS QLV - QUESTIONABLE LABORATORY VALUES TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.1 SAMPLE NO: SB-1 CONCENTRATION (UG/KG) RL IUG/KG) QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA 180 530 220 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 ND ND 200 110 120 170 ND 340 ND 1,200 3,250 2,090 NA 420 MG/KG 5.4 11 5.4 11 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 720 720 720 720 720 720 3,500 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 1.4 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATIONS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. d, J d, J d, J d d d d d d d d d, J d d d, J d, J d, J d, J d d, J d d TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVt CE! PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.2 SAMPLE NO: SB-3 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOHOETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 RL (UG/KGI QUALIFIERS 6.3 13 6.3 13 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO IG,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 780 ND ND 790 660 450 1,1OO ND 420 ND 3,400 7,600 6,490 NA 2,000 MCIKG 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4.200 20,000 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 d d d d d d d d d d d d, J d d d, J d, J d, J d, J d d, J d d, J 2.5 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATIONS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE S LABORATORY RESULTS • SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.3 SAMPLE NO: SB-4 CONCENTRATION (UG/KGI RL IUG/KGI QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES -TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (Bl FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 44 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 44 0 NA 27 MG/KG 5.8 12 5.8 12 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 380 380 380 380 380 380 1,800 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 0.29 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.4 SAMPLE NO: SB-5 CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI RL IUG/KGI QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs S£MI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (Al PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 680 ND ND 100 ND ND ND ND ND ND 780 0 6.2 12 6.2 12 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 410 410 410 410 410 410 2,000 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 TPH NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA 81 MG/KG 3.1 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITSS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.5 SAMPLE NO: SB-9 VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE CONCENTRATION fUG/KGI 2.3 160 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 162.3 0 RL IUG/KGI 6.0 12 6.0 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 QUALIFIERS J NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (Bl FLUORANTHENE BENZO <K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 110 ND ND 48 ND ND ND ND ND ND 158 0 NA NA 35 MG/KG 390 390 390 390 390 390 1,900 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 0.29 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.6 SAMPLE NO: SB-10 CONCENTRATION IUG/KG) RL IUG/KGI QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,000 ND ND 130 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,130 0 NA 6.1 12 6.1 12 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 400 400 400 400 400 400 2,000 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 230 MG/KG 0.88 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.7 SAMPLE NO: SB-11 CONCENTRATION IUG/KG) RL IUG/KG) QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (Al PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA ND ND ND ND ND 43 ND ND ND ND ND 61 140 ND ND 70 49 87 ND ND ND 87 537 278 NA 230 MG/KG 5.8 12 5.8 12 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 380 380 380 380 380 380 1,900 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 2.8 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d • REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS - SOIL SAMPLE JULY 1993 ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 5.9 SAMPLE NO: FIELD BLANK CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI RL IUG/KGI QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX -f MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYDPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND 4.7 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.7 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0 NA 0.062 MG/KG 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.010 MG/KG UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. .6 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS -SOIL SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 6.1 PARAMETER VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1.1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES MTBE N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI • VOAs PHENOL 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO |A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE CH-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO IK! FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO 11,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI- VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI- VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs M ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg f ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kfl ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 1 ug/kg n V) ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA 180 530 220 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 ND ND 20O 110 120 170 ND 340 ND 1,200 3,250 2,090 NA NA m s ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 780 ND ND 790 660 450 1,100 ND 420 ND 3,400 7.600 6,490 NA NA o>u) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND NO NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 44 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 44 0 NA NA SAMPLE ID 10 </> ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 680 ND ND 100 ND ND ND ND ND ND 780 0 NA NA I 2.3 160. ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 162.3 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 110 ND ND 48 ND ND ND ND ND ND 158 0 NA NA o I ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,000 ND ND 130 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,130 0 NA NA in ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND 43 ND ND ND ND ND 61 140 ND ND 70 49 87 ND ND ND 87 537 278 NA NA M A M ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 0 0 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,200 ND ND 91 ND 46 ND ND ND ND 1,337 46 NA NA £ 1 ND 4.7 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.7 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA TPH mg/kg 420 2,000 27 81 35 230 230 150 0.0620 TABLE 7 LABORATORY RESULTS - LIQUID SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 7.1 SAMPLE NO: HB3-L OIL VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- NAPHTHALENE VOAs 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL X.^ PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs . . H TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION IUG/KGI NO 450,000 ND ND 340.000 79,000 2,300,000 2,600,000 ND 89,000 5.858,000 5,319,000 10 1 5.800,000 680 810 110 ND 180 29 ND 41 89 ND 45 46 280 28 30 ND 28 ND 33 2,429 2,121 20 11,410 CONCENTRATION (MG/KG) 1 ,200,000 caoi (UG/KGI 120,000 120,000 1 20,000 5.000 5,000 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KG) 1 ,000,000 QUALIFIERS U B BJ U J D J U J J U J J J J J J J UG/KG • MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) i/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) QL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ..^-NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. . IMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. V^^OUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE RPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. THYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED . - BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 7 LABORATORY RESULTS • LIQUID SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 7.2 SAMPLE NO: HB3-L OIL DL VQAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETH ANE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs CONCENTRATION CRQL IUG/KG) (UG/KGI ND 240,000 480,000 250.000 ND 240.000 290.000 ND 240,000 1.700.000 2,000.000 NA NA 4,720,000 3,990,000 10 22,900.000 QUALIFIERS U BD D U D U D D SEMI- VOAs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO IB) FLUORANTHENE BENZO <K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO 11.2,3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G.H.II PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs •H TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) 3/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) iQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ) - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. ETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. -. >'OUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE TRPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. ETHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE. AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED ) BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA CONCENTRATION (MG/KG) NA REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KG) TABLE 7 LABORATORY RESULTS - LIQUID SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 7.3 SAMPLE NO: HB3-L WATER VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs VOAs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE ^^ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs 'H TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION IUG/L1 ND 250 74 ND 360 ND 150 230 6.200 86 7,350 6.940 3 1,250 2,900 3,100 530 ND 790 ND ND ND 410 ND ND ND 1,100 NA ND ND ND ND 8.830 6.790 18 41,200 CONCENTRATION (MG/KG) 1,900 CROJ. (UC/U 500 500 500 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2.000 2.000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 220 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KG) 250 QUALIFIERS U BJ J U J U J J J J U J U U U J U U U J U U U U UG/L - MICROGRAMS PER LITER; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) j/L - MILLIGRAMS PER LITER; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) tQL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. ) - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. ETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. OUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. ETHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED ) BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 7 LABORATORY RESULTS - LIQUID SAMPLES APRIL 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 7.4 SAMPLE NO: TREATED TAP VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs VOAs NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL ^~-^ PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO IA) ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs >H TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS CONCENTRATION tUG/U ND 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 0 1 6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND 0 0 3 36 CONCENTRATION (MG/KG) ND CRQL fUG/LI 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 10 10 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 REPORTING LIMIT (MG/KG) 0.50 QUALIFIERS U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UG/L - MICROGRAMS PER LITER; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPBI "G/L - MILLIGRAMS PER LITER; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) 1QL - CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. 3 - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. 1 - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. "ETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. •OUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE ^^OSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. ETHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED ) BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS - DRUM SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 8.1 SAMPLE NO: SAMPLE 1 CONCENTRATION (MG/KGI RL IMG/KG) QUALIFIERS VOAs SEMI- VOAs TPH METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs PHENOL 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND 77 99 29 1,600 310 2.200 NA NA 4,315 4,139 NA ND ND ND 840 850 ND ND 150 ND ND 59 130 ND 80 69 130 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2,308 2,178 NA 300,000 25 50 25 50 25 25 25 50 25 25 480 480 480 480 480 480 2,400 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 380 UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMITS ND - NOT DETECTED NA • NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS PARAMETER u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. u u u u u u u u, D u u d d d d d d d d, J d d d. J d, J d d, J d, J d, J d d d d d d TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS - DRUM SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 8.2 SAMPLE NO: SAMPLE 2 CONCENTRATION IMG/KG) RL (MG/KG) QUALIFIERS VOAs SEMI- VOAs TPH METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs PHENOL 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISI2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND 180 260 39 1,600 260 1,800 NA NA 4,139 3,699 NA ND ND ND 600 620 110 ND 230 ND ND 51 98 ND 61 ND 170 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,940 1,770 NA 280,000 50 100 50 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 480 480 480 480 480 480 2,400 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 290 UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMITS ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS PARAMETER u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. u u u u u u u u, J u u d d d d d d, J d d. J d d d, J d, J d d, J d d d d d d d d TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS - DRUM SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 8.3 SAMPLE NO: SAMPLES CONCENTRATION IMG/KG) RL IMG/KG) QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G.H.I) PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND 410 210 40 1,100 160 1,000 NA NA 2,920 2,300 NA ND ND ND 390 450 80 ND 80 ND ND ND 72 ND ND ND 160 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,232 1,072 NA 320,000 25 50 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 490 490 490 490 490 490 2,500 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 480 UG/KG • MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS PARAMETER u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL B • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. u u u u u u u u. D u u d d d d, J d, J d, J d d d d d d, J d d d d, J d d d d d d TABLES LABORATORY RESULTS - DRUM SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 8.4 SAMPLE NO: SAMPLE 4 CONCENTRATION IMG/KGI RL IMG/KGI QUALIFIERS VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TERT-BUTYL METHYL ETHER (MTBE) N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI- PHENOL VOAs 2-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYLPHENOL NAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE FLUORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO <A( PYRENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BENZO (G,H,II PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs TPH TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ND ND ND ND 370 160 79 1,600 320 2,200 NA NA 4,729 4,199 NA ND ND ND 710 790 57 ND 150 ND ND 54 130 ND 73 ND 170 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2,134 1,964 NA 290,000 25 50 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 500 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 400 u u u u u u u u, D u u d d d d d d. J d d, J d d d, J d, J d d, J d d, J d d d d d d UG/KG - MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPB) MG/KG - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) RL - REPORTING LIMIT ND - NOT DETECTED NA - NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS PARAMETER u - REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d • REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U - COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS, BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED, BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B - COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D - COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS ND WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE, ACETONE, 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. TABLE 9 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS - DRUM SAMPLES JULY 1993 RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS. USVI CB PROJECT NO. 92115 PAGE 9.1 PARAMETER VOAs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 2-BUTANONE 1 , 1 , 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES MTBE N-PROPYLBENZENE TOTAL VOAs TOTAL BTEX + MTBE NUMBER OF VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF VOA TICs SEMI • VOAs PHENOL 2-METHYL PHENOL 4-METHYL PHENOL •IAPHTHALENE VIETHYLNAPHTHALENE ^OJORENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BENZO (Al ANTHRANCENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYUPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALTTE BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE BENZO <K) FLUORANTHENE BENZO (A) PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CDI PYRENE BENZO (G.H.II PERYLENE TOTAL SEMI-VOAs TOTAL PAHs NUMBER OF SEMI-VOA TICs EST. CONC. OF SEMI-VOA TICs M ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg f ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg * ug/kg i NO NO ND ND 77,000 99.000 29,000 1,600,000 310,000 2.200,000 NA NA 4,315,000 4.139,000 NA NA ND ND ND 840,000 850,000 ND ND 150.000 ND ND 59,000 130,000 ND 80.000 69.000 130.000 ND ND ND NO ND ND 2,308.000 2,178,000 NA M M 3 NO ND ND ND 180.000 260.000 39.000 1,600,000 260.000 1,800.000 NA NA 4.139.000 3,699.000 NA NA ND ND ND 600,000 620.000 110,000 ND 230.000 ND ND 51,000 98.000 ND 61,000 ND 170,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,940.000 1.770,000 NA I NO NO ND ND 410,000 210,000 40.000 1,100,000 160.000 1.000.000 NA NA 2.920,000 2,300,000 NA NA ND ND NO 390.000 450.000 80.000 ND 80,000 ND ND ND 72.000 ND ND ND 160.000 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.232,000 1,072,000 NA I ND ND ND ND 370,000 160,000 79.000 1.600,000 320.000 2.200,000 NA NA 4,729,000 4.199,000 NA NA ND ND NO 710.000 790.000 57.000 ND 150,000 ND ND 54.000 130.000 ND 73.000 ND 170.000 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.134,000 1,964,000 NA i NO 4.7 ND ND NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NA 4.7 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TPH mg/kg 300.000 280.000 320.000 290,000 0.0620 NOTES FOR TABLE 2 UG/KG • MICHOGRAMS PER KILOGRAM: EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER BILLION (PPBI MG/KG • MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM; EQUIVALENT TO PARTS PER MILLION IPPM) CROL • CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMIT. 1 • NOT DETECTED • NOT ANALYZED FOR REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO HIGH LEVELS OF TARGET ANALYTES. d • REPORTING LIMITS RAISED DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCES. U • COMPOUND WAS TARGETED BY ANALYSIS. BUT WAS NOT DETECTED. J - COMPOUND WAS IDENTIFIED. BUT CONCENTRATION IS ESTIMATED AT VALUE LESS THAN CRQL. B • COMPOUND DETECTED IN ASSOCIATED LABORATORY BLANK AS WELL AS IN SAMPLE. D • COMPOUND IDENTIFIED IN AN ANALYSIS AT A SECONDARY DILUTION FACTOR. SLA - SUSPECT LABORATORY ARTIFACTS OLV • QUESTIONABLE LABORATORY VALUES TARGETED COMPOUNDS NOT LISTED WERE NOT DETECTED DURING ANALYSES. COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED AS NO WERE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING TOTALS. METHYLENE CHLORIDE. ACETONE. 2-BUTANONE, AND PHTHALATE ESTERS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LABORATORY ARTIFACTS. 05*00' 10-251 10*17 <W'60f COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGNEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SOENTISTS GENERAL LOCATION MAP TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 92115 DATE: 11-22-93 SCALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE: 1 »;m^: -NS P^S^rp-too^x'-N-^//'r~vi ' I ^ •-^S^^i^;^;^' ^^'^SfeA.^'"|-r^x3?^i^^c ff\\ 's. ,L \^ '^r^^i^'^^tii ^\v/-. :-^s^Mi ^ktSZ-- EASTERN ST. THOMAS. V. N 1815— WM/lfi/7 S X f- I'lKI.IN IblANDS I 'in j ; c'Hi v:r .1 : ' '. :•}•.:' DMA IC2? IV f,F SLRIES 1--B3I CENTRAL ST. THOMAS. V 18061 C8 IF 07-: IS/ MILS) I_ 0-35^ l| 10 MIIS 'M CRIU ANO 1982 MACNE1IC NORTH DICLINAIION AT CENTER OF SHEET c COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCIENTISTS TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 92115 DATE: 11-22-93 SCALE: 1 : 24,000 FIGURE: 2 HB-9 A REPORTEDOJST LOCATION RAMSAY AUTO ORU STORAGE ARE RAMSAY SALES OFFICE LEGEND COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGICERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCENTISTS -| SOIL B O R I N Q L O C A T I O N - JULY 1 » » S W-7 HAND AUQER LOCATION • A P R I L 1113 TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 92115 SCALE: r - 75 DATE: 11-22-93 A T LOCATION RAMSAY AUTO RAMSAY SALES OFFICE LEGEND S O I L B O R I N G LOCATION • JULY 19*3 HAND AUGER LOCATION - A P R I L 1 » t S MO) CONCENTRATION OF PETROLEUM RELATED VOA8 (BTEX * UTBE) IN MCROORAM8 PER KILOGRAM (ug/kg) -ISOCONCENTR ATION CONTOUR COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGNEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCENTKTS I80CONCENTRATION MAP PETROLEUM RELATED VOA'« IN SOILS TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 92115 DATE: 11-22-93 SCALE: 1" - 75' FIGURE: 5 HB-9 A (47) REPORTEDJJST LOCATION RAMSAY AUTO DRU STORAGE ARE RAMSAY SALES OFFICE LEGEND SOIL B O R I N G LOCATION • J U L Y 1 » » S HAND AUQER L O C A T I O N • A P R I L 1013 CONCENTRATION OF PETROLEUM RELATED SEM-VOAl (PAH.) IN MICROQRAMS PER KILOGRAM (ug/kg) -DO---ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENONEERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCENTBTS ISOCONCENTRATION MAP PETROLEUM RELATED SEMI-VOA't IN SOILS TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 93115 DATE: 11-22-93 SCALE: 1" - 75' FIGURE: 6 RAMSEY WS WELL <ND> REPORTEDOJST LOCATION RAMSAY AUTO REPAIR DRU STORAGE ARE RAMSAY SALES OFFICE UNPAVED PARKING LAYER LEGEND S O I L B O R I N Q LOCATION - J U L Y 1 » 9 S HAND AUQBR L O C A T I O N - A P R I L 1 » » S ,275, CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) IN MICROQRAMS PER KILOGRAM (up/kg) MOO---I8OCONCENTRATION CONTOUR COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGtCERS • GEOLOGISTS • SCENTISTS ISOCONCENTRATION MAP TPH IN SOILS TUTU SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PROJECT: 92115 DATE: 11-22-93 SCALE: 1' - 75' FIGURE: 7 APPENDIX I Lists of Background Documents Reviewed by CEI DOCUMENTS LIST (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT ADAMS & ASSOC. ADRAIN SCHOTTROFF/ DPNR ARNALDO MARTINEZ/REO. II TECH. ASSIS. TEAM ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT U.S. V.I. Dept. of Public Works MEMBERS OF TUTU TECH REVIEW COMM. RESPONSE & PREVENTION US EPA RAMSAY MOTORS TILLETT GARDENS ANTILLES ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT TEXACO O'HENRI DRYCLEANERS DATE OF DOCUMENT 06/01/78 04/05/93 08/31/87 10/14/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/14/93 10/14/93 10/ 14/93 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT CORR LEGAL WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Well Field Development Program - East End, St. Thomas Fax transmittal to all Tutu Technical Review Committee Members discussing the upcoming two-day meeting (on April 26427) Sampling Plan for the Tutu Well Site prepared by the TAT (ES800069 - ES800075) Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas NUMBER OF PAGES 17 17 17 17 17 17 PAGE* DOCUMENTS LISi (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 92115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT ARTHUR D. LITTLE BARBEL ENTER. BELOODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT FOUR WINDS PLAZA CHRIS DAOGETT/REG. ADMIN. EPA USEPA DPNR - U.S.V.I. & USEPA DPNR - U.S.V.I. & USEPA ESSO ESSO ESSO DATE OF DOCUMENT 10/H/93 12/01/87 undated 01/11/88 12/28/87 06/01/88 06/01/88 06/14/88 TYPE OF DOCUMENT WORK PLAN LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Response to Request for Information Concerning O'Henry Cleaners (ES800602-ES800606) Esso TUTU Car Care Center Investigation Plan, Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Plan Esso TUTU Service Station Soil Vapor Inv. Plan Esso TUTU Service Station Health & Safety Plan Photocopies of Original Chromatograms & Calibration Curves - Esso TUTU SUPPLEMENT - Photocopies of Original Chromatograms A Calibration Curves - Esso TUTU Project Esso TUTU Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report NUMBER OF PAGES 17 Cover only - missing 35pp Cover only - missing 40 pp Cover only - missing 20pp Cover only - missing 175 PP Have cover + 2pp Explanations & Observations missing 150pp PAGEV LlL ,/ DOCUMENTS LI&. ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT„[. -2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT HELGODERE & ASSOC. BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P. C. BRENDA HOLLAR C.O'NEILL-COORD. / US EPA CALISE, LAURA/MONITORING MGMT./US EPA COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ESSO STANDARD OIL ? ANNA RAMOS/TEIC S. LUPTlG-RMER.fli REM. ESP. D1V. CAROLINE KWAN/NY- CARIBB. BRANCH/ US EPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 06/ M/88 10/01/93 03/20/92 01/06/88 02/ 10/89 11/25/87 02/05/88 06/29/88 07/11/88 03/ 13/89 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORTS REPORT LETTER LEGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report Supplement Site Assessment Program Site Access Agreement TEIC Preliminary Assessment & Confirmation of Auth. of CERCLA REmoval Actions Monies for TUTU Well Site from Carlos O'Neill to Stephen Luftlg (ES800607-ES800616A) Memorandum from Laura Scalise to Caroline Kwan in Ref. to TUTU Well Field Site Work Plan for the Removal & Installation of 2 Undergound Storage Tanks, Revised I/ 13/89 (ES800698-ES800727) overview of Texaco Soil Gas Survey of the Tutu Well field site comments on Esso Tutu soil vapor inv. plan & Q.A. control plan (Dec. 28, 1987) overview of Esso Soil Gas Survey conducted Apr. 5, 1988 through April 23, 1988 comments on Esso Tutu Service Station Soli Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report, June 14, 1988 comments on water collected from the tank pit during the Tutu Texaco Service Station tank excavation NUMBER OF PAGES 10 2 DOCUMENTS LIS1 (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. *2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT CDM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 04/14/89 04 / 14/89 03/31/89 03/07/89 01/04/89 01/31/90 02/16/90 02/27/90 04/20/90 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the 104e Itr. Response Sampling Tutu Wellfleld Area CLP Sample Ananlysis Data of 104(e) letter CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of 104e Ltr. Response Sampling Overview of TUTU Texaco Soil Vent. Task for the Tank Excavation Program Overview of the Tutu Texaco Service Station Soil Vent. Task for the Tank Excavation Program CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary, Tutu Wellfleld Area Description of sampling locations - Tutu Wellfield site Revised overview rpt. of Esso Tank Excavation Chronology of Events & FPC Oversight thru March 1990 NUMBER OF PAGES PAGEb LISv ..i DOCUMENTS LISv ..ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO 2115 i GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL CHESTER, AMY R./US EPA CLEMICNTASSOC. COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA JOSE CEPADA/ATTNY. ? UNKNOWN N/A ALL DATE OF DOCUMENT 04/24/90 05/31/90 12/17/90 04/07/92 02/21/92 10/01/85 09/13/91 09/ 17/92 not dated TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL REPORT REPORT MISC. LEOAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Ltr. Rpt. - Review of Esso Rpt. on Tank Excavation & Soil SWBpHW Ramp]/. Analyst* rtata Summary «f Sn}1» * Waters Sampled in 1989 from Texaco Soil, Esso Excav. Pit and Soli, and 104e Ltr. Response Sites (2nd Round) Ltr. Rpt. - Tech. Review of Esso's Revised Tank Excavation and Soil Sampling Rpt. Community Relations Plan for the TUTU Wells Site (contains news releases) TUTU Wells Site Administrative Order on Consent Index No. II-RCRA-Proceeding 7003 & 9003-92-0401 (ESSO 1073- B§flQrV19?Dimmnry Reports nn Transport & Fate flk Health Effects of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, Ethylbenzene, & 2,3,6- Trichlorobenzoic Acid Reports of 7/90 adn 2/91 sampling events at Tutu wellsite- lab data; letters; etc. film packets Tutu Lateral Waterline Contract NUMBER OF PAGES Cover Page only- missing 30 pp many 13 PAGE LIS\ DOCUMENTS LISi (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. ,2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT D'ANNA, NANCY, CEPADA JOSE, & MCCAY, R. SCOTT DCCA deDIEGO ENCARNACION, JOSE/V.I. HOUSING AUTH. DEMA, JOHN DONNELLY, THOMAS WALLACE ENSECO ENSECO ENSECO RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT AMY R. CHESTER/US EPA TUTU WATER CHRIS DAGGETT/ US EPA MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS Princeton University N/A RAMSAY RAMSAY DATE OF DOCUMENT 10/26/90 08/ 13/87 01/25/88 01/18/93 05/01/59 04/12/90 04/12/93 04/12/93 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL MISC. REPORT LAB DATA INVOICES INVOICES DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT EPA Order which conforms with Section VII 2 of Administative Orders Nos. II-CERCLA-040 1 & RCRA-90- 0401 in ref. to Tillet's Well (ES801065-ES801068) Letter from the Dept. of Conservation fli Cult. Affairs from Alan Smith to Mr. Eric Tillet (ES 800033-ES800O34) Response to Request for Information Concerning the Virgin Islands ousing Authority (ES8006 17-ES800627) Lab reports from Caribbean Hydro-Tech Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, Virgin Islands (A Dissertation - Property of the US Geological Survey - WRD San Juan, P.R.) General Sampling Guidlines FEDEX Internationa] Airway Bill for lab supplies Chain of Custody form for sampling supplies (bottles, vials, etc.) NUMBER OF PAGES 31 JSi DOCUMENTS LIS * (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT J2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory OARCIA, IVAN OARCIA, IVAN/ ROY F. WKSTON GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS LTD. OEOSCIENCR CONSULTANTS, LTD. GERAGHTY & MILLER OERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA CARLOS O'NEILL/EPA LUIS SANTOS/EPA TEXACO TEXACO TEIC USEPA TEIC TEIC DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/01/88 4/ 17/90 05/20/91 12/18/87 10/H/87 01/01/91 04/05/91 05/13/91 09/01/91 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT LAB DATA U\B DATA REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Site Analysis: TUTU Wellfield (Aerial Photographic WffiWrritfr'HWri rHHrHiflV/rl'PSrflr* n-Neill to rtonimrnt thr transmittal of Sampling Plan, Site Maps & Photovac results 1987-90 Memorandum re: results of February 1990 quarterly sampling of Tutu Well site (ES900121-ES900127) Final Report on Results of Soil Gas Survey TUTU, St. Thomas (Revised January 25, 1988) Quality Assurance Project Plan For Soil Gas Survey, Texaco Service Station 1st Qtrly. Sampling Rpt., Sept 1990 Re-evaluation of Esso TUTU Soil Gas Survey (Aug. '88), Final CLP Sample Analysis) of Soils & Waters in 1989, and Final Report on Laboratory Analyses of Soil for Tank Replacement Work at Esso (Sept. 1990) Second Quarter Sampling Report, February 1991, TUTU Wells Site Quarterly Sampling (includes Data Validation Summary Rpt.) Revised Sampling (from September 1990) Analysis, and Monitoring Plan for TUTU Wells NUMBER OF PAGES Missing Photos Cover only - total pp unknown PAGE LIS\ |/ DOCUMENTS LlSi (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. „ GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT OERAOIITY &MILLRR GRRAGIITY & MILLRR GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TRIG TEIC Dcpt. of Public Works TEIC TEIC U. S.V.I. Dept. of Consv. & Cultural Affairs TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TUTU SERVICE STATION DATE OF DOCUMENT 09/06/91 01/01/92 03/11/92 05/01/92 08/27/92 04/01/83 03/01/92 03/20/92 03/19/91 02/01/93 not dated TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT LETTER REPORTS MAPS DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Third Sampling Report, June 1991, TUTU Wells Site Fourth Sampling Report, October 1991, TUTU Wells Site Request for temporary authorization of ground water discharge to sanitary sewer in the TUTU area Fifth Sampling Report, February 1992, TUTU Wells Site Sixth Sampling Report, May 1992, TUTU Wells Site Report on Current Groundwater Conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands TUTU Service Station Investigation Work Plan Tutu Service Station Investigation Work Plan St. Thomas, U.S. V.I. ¥fc^litote^liPj»fitfftee%flH>ttl»8leld Program at Tiitii Station/US VI Map of Tutu Service Station showing well, soil borings, etc. NUMBER OF PAGES Have 2 copies 1 PAGE DOCUMENTS LISl ^ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. . GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT GERAGIITY fli MILLER QERAGHTY & MILLER GERAHTY & MILLER GOLDMAN & ANTONETTI ETAL QRAHER, SCOTT/CDM CORP. GRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROG. CORP. GRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROGRAMS CORP. GRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROGRAMS CORP. GROSSMAN, I.G. HABSCHMAN, ROBERT/ ATTNY. HAMLIN, DONALD L. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TUTU WELLSITE TUTU WELLSITE USEPA USEPA CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA USEPA U.S. Dept. of the Interior C. DOLAN/US EPA & F. LANG/DPNR U.S.V.I. Dept. ofConsv. & Cultural Affairs DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/10/92 03/11/92 01/11/91 08/08/90 04/24/89 01/12/89 09/ 19/88 10/17/88 06/01/59 11/19/87 02/01/86 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL REPORT LEGAL REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Request for Temporary Authorization of Air Discharge in the Tutu Area Request for Temporary Authorization of Ground-Water Discharge to Sanitary Sewer in the Tutu Area Project Schedule for Geraghty & Miller Tutu Well Sampling Letter from Goodman, Antonetti et al re: CERCLA & RCRA regulations Summary of 104(c) Letter Response & Facility Inspections Relating to Underground Storage Tanks in the TUTU Well Field (ES800728-ES800729) Review of Work Plan for the Removal & Installation of 2 Underground Storage Tanks at TUTU Esso Car Care Center on Dec.. 1988 by Scott GraberfES80Q695-RS800697) Updated Tech. Review or 9CE^8£A^O^epReapoiisefa ——— O'Henry Cleaners, Ramsay Motors, Cons. Auto Parts, Rodriguez Auto Parts, Esso, Texaco,... (ES800670- ES800676) Administrative Order on Consent, TUTU Well Field Area by Scott Graber (ES800683-ES800694) Ground Water Data from St. Thomas Response to Request for Information Concerning Ramsey Motors, Inc. (ES800583-ES800591) Leaking Underground Storage Tank Survey - St. Thomas, St. John and St. Croix NUMBER OF PAGES 12 11 4 5 Cover only missing 25pp PAGE lo LIS\ DOCUMENTS LIS\ ^ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT HANKINSON, KKANK/NCDKIINK HILLSMAN, MARK HROCH, W./TEXACO HYDROLOGIC ASSOCIATES U.S.A., INC, HYDROLOGIC AifflSfi^^VTCrH ASSIS. TEAM ft. O. RHYMER /DPNR JORDAN & COSTNER JORDAN & FISHER JORDAN, DONALD G. JUNKIN, TIMOTHY/ ATTNY. KELDER, G. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ORKO LUNOnLAD TUTU WATER WELLS LITIGATION FILE CAROLINE KWAN US EPA FOUR WINDS AND PID/HARTIIMAN FOUR WINDS AND O'NEILL/RESPONSE & PREV./US EPA U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey CAROLYN KWAN/ US EPA CEI DATE OF DOCUMENT 10/09/92 10/20/93 11/30/87 10/01/93 10/01/93 09/04/87 01/01/73 01/01/77 01/01/72 03/02/88 08/25/92 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LETTER MEMO LEGAL REPORT REPORT LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL MISC. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Dhase IIA Assessment Work Plan and Interim ?cmcdmtion/Huncoinbe County, North Carolina Rule 34 Physical Inspections By The Laga Defendants Response to Request for Information Concerning Texaco Service Station (ES800592-ES800601) Geohydrologic Analysis and Water Quality Data Geohydrologic Analysis and Water Quality Data Survey Summary of Well/Cistern Usage at Tutu Well Site prepared by Isabelle Allgood (ES8001 19-ES800124) A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, V.I. Relation of Bulk Precipitation and Evaporation to Water Quality and Water Resources, St. Thomas, V.I. Land-Use Effect on the Water Regimen of the U.S. Virgin Islands Response to Request for Information to Jim Tillet (ES800628-ES800631) letter from G. Keldcr re: expert services NUMBER OF PAGES 2 8 large document 55 1 DOCUMENTS LlS i (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. >2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT KWAN, CAROLINE/US EPA KWAN, CAROLINE/ US EPA KWAN, CAROLINK/US EPA LAW ENGINEERING, INC. LAW ENGINEERING, INC. LAW ENGINEERING, INC. LAW ENGINEERING, INC. LAW ENGINEERING, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT PRKS. RAMSEY MOTORS PRES./CONS. AUTO SCOTT GRADER/CDM CORP. VAN WINKLE.BUCK.WALL et al LAW ENG. NCDNR N/A KAY DEDNANT/DEHNR CHRISTINE WARREN/BUNCOMBE CO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 05/18/88 05/ 18/88 03/31/89 10/09/92 09/17/91 06/H/91 03/18/93 06/06/91 03/25/92 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL CORR CORR REPORTS REPORTS PHONE RECORD CORR DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Tollow-up Information on the Request for Information concerning Ramscy Motors, Inc. (ES800655) Follow -up Information on the Request for Info Concerning Consolidated Auto, Inc. (ES800656-ES800664) CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the 104(e) Letter Response Sampling by CDM Fed. Programs Corp. (ES801119-ES801126) Letter to Mr. Phil Smith re:status update and revised Scope of Services at the And rex plant Record of phone call between Kay Dechant/NCDNR-DEM and a Law employee about And rex Phase IIA Expanded Contamination Assessment Work Plan Interim Data Submitted & Progress Report Re: Andrex Industries Facility - Groundwater Assessment Letter from Project engineers/Law Envir. to Christine Warren, submitting a municipal discharge permit application to the Metro. Sewerage District (MSD) of Buncombe Co. NUMBER OF PAGES l LIS* DOCUMENTS LIS. (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT IJ\W ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LEBRON ASSOC. LUFTIO, STEPHEN/ US EPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT JAMES EMORY/BUNCOMBE CO. N/A METRO SEWER. DISTRICT/ BUNCOM BE CO. ANDREX WESTERN NC REQ. AIR POLL. CONTROL TEXACO CARLOS O'NEILL/ US EPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 04/07/93 06/18/92 03/19/93 03/24/93 03/25/93 05/ 18/88 09/28/88 TYPE OF DOCUMENT CORR REPORTS REPORTS REPORTS REPORTS REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Letter answering questions about Andrex Work plan for Contaminant Source Identification and Off- site Ground Water Assessment Application for Permit to discharge treated ground water Interim Engineering Report-proposed interim treatment system for recovered ground water (2 copies) Application for Air Quality Permit (2 copies) Supplement To Revised Action Plan For Tanks Removal Authorization of Additional Trust Fund Monies for CERCLA Removal Activ. at TUTU Well Site from Luftig to O'Ncill (ES800677-ES800682) NUMBER OF PAGES Cover only - missing 20 pp PAGE 1.5 i DOCUMENTS LlSi (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. =*2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT MENTZEL, MICHAEL & D'ONOFRIO, CRIS/ WESTON SPER N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NCDEHNR NCDEHNR RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT CARLOS O'NEILL/RESP. & PREV./US EPA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ANDREX OREG LUNDBLAD/ANDREX DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/12/87 not dated not dated not dated not dated 05/16/91 06/27/91 05/23/91 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LAB DATA INVOICES MAPS MAPS MISC. CORR MISC DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Memorandum from Michael Mentzel & Cris D'Onofrio, TAT, in reference to a Well Water Sampling Status Report (ES800243-ES800278) Notes Blank commercial invoice Close up of Central St. Thomas Closer up of Central St. Thomas Notes Letter notifying Orcg Lundblad, VP of Andrex, of cvironmental violation Re: Notice of Violation for Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act and Ground Water Standards and Classifications NUMBER OF PAGES l c PAGE DOCUMENTS LIS'i (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT NCDEM NCDEM NCDEM NUS CORP. NUS CORP. NUS CORP. NUS CORP. NUS CORP. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT NCDEM ANDREX ANDREX USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA DATE OF DOCUMENT not dated 09/ 14/92 12/24/93 03/24/89 03/31/89 03/24/89 05/26/89 03/24/89 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LAB DATA CORR CORR REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Leak Reporting Form on Andrex Industries, for leak occuring on 4/ 19/9 1 Letter from DEM to Greg Lundblad re: Phase II Assessment Work Plan Follow up letter from NCDEM re:Phase IIA Assessment Work Plan Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Laga Building/Department of Education Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - TUTU Texaco (REV. No. 0) Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Oassett Motors Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - TUTU Texaco (REV. No. 1) Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Ramsey Motors NUMBER OF PAGES have 20pp missing 130pp have cover only/ missing 150pp have 23pp missing 75pp have cover page only missing 200pp have cover page only missing 150 PP PAGE to DOCUMENTS LIS\ ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. - 115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT NUS CORP. O'CONNOR & LEMOS, P.A. O'NEIL, C./US ERA PARKER, ROY/CEI I'lCRDKO PANZARDI & ASSOC. RAMOS, A./TEIC RAMOS, A./TEIC KAMOB, ANA C.LOKIA/TKIG RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA VARIOUS PEOPLE WM. MUZYNSKI CEI USEPA USEPA USEPA CAROLE PETERSON/NY CARIUH. SUPRKNO HR. 1 DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/28/91 10/15/93 08/22/88 On/05/93 11/01/89 02/19/91 03/20/91 06/03/92 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT FAX LEGAL INTER-VIEW REPORT LETTER LETTER I.EOAI, DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Final Draft, Hazard Ranking System Documentation, TUTU Wellfleld, Volume 1 of 5 (Rev. No. 1) Response of Texaco, Inc. Texaco Caribbean, Inc. and Vernon Morgan to EXXON corporation's Request to Permit Entry Upon Land Request for a Twelve Mo. Exemption for TUTU Well Site from O'Neill to Muzynskl (ES800665-ES800669) Interview performed by Roy Parker/CEI on April 5, 1993 on James J. Urban Preliminary Site Assessment for L'Henry, Inc Monthly progress report 2/ 19/91 Monthly progress report 3/20/91 Letter to Ana Gloria Ramos, TEIC Designated Coordinator, in reference to the Administrative Order No. 1 1-CERCLA- 00401 & RCRA-90-9003-0401 by Carole Peterson (RS801 1 10-RS8O1 ] I 1) NUMBER OF PAGES Cover page only 3 Cover + Tbl of Cont. Missing 40pp 2 2 PAGE ID DOCUMENTS LIS i (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. .2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT RAMSAY MOTORS RAMSAY MOTORS REED & ROBISON REED, LEONARD/USVI RICH, CAROL RICH, CAROL ROY F. WESTON SABATINO, THOMAS/C.A.L. TKCIINOLOniKS SARRIERA, W. & DIAZ, CYMANTHA SOIL TECH CORP RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT LEONARD REED ROBT. KELLAM/WITCO U.S. Geological Survey CEI USEPA SIIAKON RICHARDSON AND TERESA LOZINOER USEPA ROY WESTON flk T.PERRETTI/TAT TEAM RKC5. II ? ESSO V.I. DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/05/87 11/13/87 04/01/72 04/07/93 03/08/93 10/26/93 10/01/91 07/30/87 08/31/87 09/19/90 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL REPORT LETTER LEGAL LETTER REPORT LEGAL LEGAL REPORT M, —— rtfifSfcfl/fJ/fiM QfJPffGUM§Njntrin ,„ reference to Preliminary Investigation or Ramsay Motors' M&l8ri9Ps'i$R9(f5$y Rh«.t* for KTulpll PT^ frnm Wif~" Labs, in response to EPA's REquest for Info, to Ramsay Motors (ESSO 1 1 12-ES80 1 1 18) Ground-Water Contamination in the Turpentine Run Basin as of April 1972 Re: TEIC meeting on April 28, 1993 Response to EPA's request for information dated 1/26/93 l-etter regarding Tutu water wcls litigation Trip Report - TUTU Wells Site Analysis of Water Samples for Volatile Organic Compounds by C.A.L. Technologies, Inc. for the TAT Team (ES800147-ES800242) Sampling Plann for the Tutu Well Site prepared by Wm. Sarriera & Cymantha Diaz (ES800076-ES800104) Final Report on Laboratory Analysis of Soil for Tank Replacement Work NUMBER OF PAGES l 20 ~ IS only-missing 50 pp with 40+ slides LIS i DOCUMENTS LIS i (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT SOIL TECH CORP. SOIL TECH. CORP. TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC TEIC RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ESSO ESSO USEPA USEPA USPA USEPA ALL USEPA USEPA USEPA N/A CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 01/11/89 04/ 17/90 05/21/90 05/29/90 06/ 19/90 07/20/90 07/12/90 08/17/90 10/22/90 01/21/91 03/18/93 0-1/09/92 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT LAB DATA LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER MISC. LETTER LETTER LETTER CORR REPORTS DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Laboratory Analyses of Soil at TUTU Esso Car Care Center Laboratory Analyses of Tutu Esso Car Care Center Monthly progress report 5/2 1/90 Revised sample analysis & monitoring plan Monthly progress report 6/ 19/90 Monthly progress report 7/20/90 attendees @ Tutu PRP meeting Monthly progress report 8/17/90 Monthly progress report 10/22/90 Monthly progress report 1/21/91 Letter including lab results for Tutu Well Site Investigation Monthly Progress Report No. 2 for Administrative Order on Consent NUMBER OF PAGES 3 1 1 3 1 :i 2 2 PAGE A- LIS. ^ DOCUMENTS LIS. .ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT 2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT TEIC TERRA VAC TEXACO TEXACO TUTU ENV. INVESTIGATION COMM. UNKNOWN UNKNOWN USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ALL Kentucky Fried Chicken of the U.S.V.I. USEPA TEXACO US EPA? COOPER USEPA US EPA US EPA USEPA US EPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/04/92 07/17/90 08/16/91 08/06/87 04/19/91 not dated 09/01/93 07/24/87 07/31/87 08/08/87 08/10/87 08/ 18/87 TYPE OF DOCUMENT NOTES REPORT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL MISC. FILE LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Site Access Agreement Tutu Environmental Investigation, St. THomas U.S. Virgin Islands (9 copies) :>reliminary Hydrogeologic Assessment Ex-Fuel Home Petroleum Fort Mylner Service Station, TUTU St. Thomas Revised Solid Waste Disposal at TUTU S/S Report Tl^qe^iMp^fij^^fit^fESs^qft^,,^^,.^^ hyp™,,- Winds to Essoon 4/8/91, BS#90001-66. Monthly Prog. Rep.4/ 19/9 1-9/20/92, (ESK800382-ES57 1 Notes from deposition of Winston Smith Information for our files EPA Pollution Report (ES80003-ES80004) EPA Pollution Report (ES800007-ES8000 10) EPA Pollution Report (ES800025-ES800028) EPA News Release (ES800029-ES800030) EPA Pollution Report (ES800035-ES80038) NUMBER OF PAGES 3 10 Many PAGE LlSi DOCUMENTS LIS i (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. ,2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT US EPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA US EPA US EPA US EPA US EPA US EPA USEPA US EPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT US EPA N/A USEPA US EPA USEPA USEPA US EPA US EPA USEPA US EPA US EPA US EPA DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/24/87 08/ 19/87 08/28/87 08/28/87 not dated 09/02/87 09/03/87 09/04/87 09/18/87 06/30/88 12/21/88 05/01/89 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT EPA Pollution Report (ES800O42-ES800045) Results based on Numbers received by T. Perette TAT- Edison (ES800046-ES800055) EPA Pollution Report (ES800056-ES800058) EPA News Release (ES800O59-ES800O64) EPA News Release (ES800065-800068) EPA Pollution Report (ES8001 13-ES800117) EPA News Release (ES8001 18) EPA Pollution Report (ES800125-ES800128) EPA Pollution Report (ES800132-ES800135) EPA l>ollution Report (ES800136-ES800140) EPA Pollution Report (ES800141-ES800143) EPA Pollution Report (ES800144-ES800146) NUMBER OF PAGES PAGE!2U I DOCUMENTS LISi (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. *2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT US EPA US EPA US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US OKOLOC5ICAL SURVEY USEPA USKI'A USEPA USEPA USEPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ESSO N/A N/A N/A N/A USEPA TICXACO ESSO STANDARD OIL ESSO STANDARD OIL ESSO STANDARD OIL DATE OF DOCUMENT 11/06/87 09/11/87 01/01/82 01/01/82 01/01/82 08/21/91 03/23/90 09/13/91 01/17/92 03/13/92 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL MAPS MAPS MAPS MAPS REPORT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Request for Info. Concerning TUTU Esso Facility (ES800572-ES800582) Map of the Potentiometric surface of Turpentine Run Basin auqifer in the Tutu area, Eastern St. Thomas, USVI Map of Eastern St. Thomas (2) Map of Central St. Thomas Quadrangle Map of Eastern St. Thomas Quadrangle Hazard Ranking System Documentation Record Administrative Order, Proceeding Under Section 106(a) of CERCLA Deposition of Leonard Reed Continued deposition of of I^conard Reed (Volume II) Continued deposition of Leonard Reed (Volume III) NUMBER OF PAGES 26 21 20 PAGE IS\ ,/ DOCUMENTS LIS'l (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. , .4115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA Region II USVI USVI USVI USVI RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TEIC TEIC MARIA TANKENSON; GOLDMAN & ANTONETTI; TEXACO TEIC TEIC CHARLOTTE AMALIE USEPA ATTY'S DATE OF DOCUMENT 07/05/90 08/ 11/90 08/10/90 08/ 19/90 08/ 18/90 09/04/90 09/26/90 not dated 06/13/91 06/18/91 09/12/91 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LEGAL REPORT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Notice of Disapproval Meeting confirmation for 8/20/90 Letter re: water connection Finalization of SAMP Plan Monthly progress report 8/ 18/90 Property Access Agreement Pollution Report #16 and Final Interrogations and demands for production of documents Depositions of Campbell Berry Depositions of Dorn Abedneg Deposition of Hans Oriol NUMBER OF PAGES 6 1 2 2 3 7 5-1 35 27 62 DOCUMENTS LIST (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT USVI USVI USVI VSybEPL_QF_PLANNINQ_i NATURAL RES. VAN WINKLE et al VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USVI USVI ESSO ENSCI VIDPNR VIDPNR Water Haulers on St. Thomas VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR HOMER fliSON DATE OF DOCUMENT 01/16/92 09/13/91 01/17/92 03/13/92 07/24/87 11/10/92 07/27/87 07/31/87 08/01/87 08/05/87 08/07/87 08/07/87 08/12/87 TYPE OF DOCUMENT ,EOAL LEGAL .EGAL LEGAL LEGAL CORR LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Deposition ofWinston Smith ^Reposition of Loenard Reed Deposition of Loenard Reed Volume II Deposition of Leonard Reed Volume III Request for info, from DPNR (ES80001-ES80002) Confidential letter to Ensci Cor. re: Andrex DPNR Order in the Matter of Texaco Caribbean (EES800005-ES800006A) DPNR Order in the Matter of Tutu Waters (ES80001 1- ES800012) DPNR Notice (ES800013) DPNR First Amendment Order in the Matter of Texaco Caribbean.Inc. (ES8000H-ES800019) DPNR Order in the Matter of the Plaza Associates (ES80002 1 -ES800022) DPNR Order in the Matter of AASA Water Supply (Harthman Wells) (ES800023-ES800024) DPNR Order in the Matter of Homer & Sons (ES800031- ES800032) NUMBER OF PAGES 108 135 148 91 + exhibits PAGE LIS1 DOCUMENTS LIS1 (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. *2115 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY VIRGIN ISLANDS, DISTRICT COURT OF RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT DPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR CEI ANNA RAMOS/TEIC DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/21/87 09/01/87 09/02/87 09/02/87 09/02/87 09/17/87 04/22/93 03/13/92 10/13/93 TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL CORR LETTER LEGAL DOC DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT DPNR Order in the Matter of Esso Standard Oil (ES800039-ES80004 1) DPNR Administrative Order for Statement of Motives by Alan D. Smith (ES800105-ES800106) DPNR News Release (ES800107-ES800108) DPNR Order in the Matter ofSteele Well (ES800109- ES800110) DPNR Order in the Matter of Harvey Well (ES8001 1 1- ES800112) DPNR Order in the Matter of Esso Standard Oil (ES800 129-ES800 13 1) Letter discussing upcoming Technical Review of data pertaining to the contamination of the Tutu aquifer Ececuted Agreement for the Comprehensive Field Investigation of Soil and Ground-Water Quality Case No. 1989-224 and Case No. 1989-220 Four Winds Plaza Partnership vs. Texaco, Inc. and P.I.D./Hartman vs. Texaco, Inc. NUMBER OF PAGES i Large Legal Document PAGE 2t DOCUMENTS LISl (ALPHABETIZED) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT WARD & JORDAN WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER WESTON WESTON SPER WESTON SPER WESTON SPER WESTON SPER WESTON SPER RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA N/A DATE OF DOCUMENT 01/01/63 07/24/89 02/02/90 10/22/87 10/ 16/87 01/27/88 02/23/88 08/ 13/87 TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Water Resources at the Virgin Islands, A Preliminary Appraisal Proceedings of the Virgin Islands Water Resources Conference Letter Report of December 1989 photovac sampling of the TUTU well site Sampling Plan of TUTU Well Site (ES800352-ES80O261) Memorandum from Arnaldo Martinez and William Schoellkopf, TAT, in reference to TUTU HSL+40 Sampling of Turpentine Run Aquifer Memorandum from Arnaldo Martinez and Douglas Henne, TAT, in reference to TUTU HSL+40 Sampling Results (ES800362-ES800369) Summary of Laboratory Results For Oil & Water Samples Collected From Tanks, Storm Drains, and Sumps at Gasoline Stations & Auto Body Shops on August 17, 1987 (SSBQQllStoi^aflflSmn KTAT-OQ-R-OaqSfi (RSHOO279- ES800311) NUMBER OF PAGES Missing Results DOCUMENTS LISTVriRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 05/01/59 06/01/59 01/01/63 01/01/72 04/01/72 01/01/73 01/01/77 06/01/78 01/01/82 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT DONNELLY, THOMAS WALLACE GROSSMAN, I.G. WARD & JORDAN JORDAN, DONALD G. REED & ROBISON JORDAN & COSTNER JORDAN & FISHER ADAMS & ASSOC. US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT Princeton University U.S. Dept. of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey U.S.V.I. Dept. of Public Works N/A TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT MAPS DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, Virgin Islands (A Dissertation - Property of the US Geological Survey - WRD San Juan, P.R.) Ground Water Data from St. Thomas Water Resources at the Virgin Islands, A Preliminary Appraisal Land-Use Effect on the Water Regimen of the U.S. Virgin Islands Ground-Water Contamination in the Turpentine Run Basin as of April 1972 A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, V.I. Relation of Bulk Precipitation and Evaporation to Water Quality and Water Resources, St. Thomas, V.I. Well Field Development Program - East End, St. Thomas Map of Eastern St. Thomas (2) PAGE DOCUMENTS LISTVriRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO DATE OF DOCUMENT 01/01/82 01/01/82 04/01/83 10/01/85 02/01/86 07/24/87 07/24/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QERAGHTY & MILLER CLEMENT ASSOC. HAMLIN, DONALD L. USEPA V.I. DEFT. OF PLANNING & NATURAL RES. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT N/A N/A U.S.V.I. Dcpt. of Consv. & Cultural Affairs ? U.S.V.I. Dept. of Consv. & Cultural Affairs USEPA ESSO TYPE OF DOCUMENT MAPS MAPS REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Map of Central St. Thomas Quadrangle Map of Eastern St. Thomas Quadrangle Report on Current Ground water Conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands General Summary Reports on Transport & Pate & Health Effects of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, Ethylbenzene, & 2,3,6- Trichlorobenzoic Acid Leaking Underground Storage Tank Survey - St. Thomas, St. John and St. Croix EPA Pollution Report (ES80003-ES80004) Request for info, from DPNR (ES80001-ES80002) PAGE^ LIS*k ,~I DOCUMENTS LIS*k ,~HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT ,2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 07/27/87 07/30/87 07/31/87 07/31/87 08/04/87 08/05/87 08/05/87 08/06/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT VIDPNR SABAT1NO, THOMAS/C.A.L. TECHNOLOGIES US EPA VIDPNR VIDPNR RAMSAY MOTORS VIDPNR TEXACO RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT VIDPNR ROY WESTON & T.PERRETTI/TAT TEAM REG. II US EPA VIDPNR Water Haulers on St. Thomas LEONARD REED VIDPNR TEXACO TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT DPNR Order In the Matter of Texaco Caribbean (EES800005-ES800006A) Analysis of Water Samples for Volatile Organic Compounds by C.A.L. Technologies, Inc. for the TAT Team (ES800H7-ES800242) EPA Pollution Report (ES800007-ES800010) DPNR Order in the Matter of Tutu Waters (ES80001 1- ES800012) DPNR Notice (ES800O13) Memoramdum from Leonard Reed to Ramsay Motors in reference to Preliminary Investigation of Ramsay Motors' Violation (EP000686) DPNR First Amendment Order in the Matter of Texaco Caribbean.Inc. (ES800014-ES800019) Texaco's News Release (ES80O020) PAGE DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/07/87 08/07/87 08/08/87 08/ 10/87 08/ 12/87 08/12/87 08/13/87 08/13/87 08/18/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT V1DPNR V1DPNR US EPA US EPA MENTZEL, MICHAEL & D'ONOFRIO, CRIS/ WESTON SPER VIDPNR DCCA WESTON SPER US EPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT VIDPNR VIDPNR US EPA US EPA CARLOS O'NEILL/RESP. & PREV./US EPA HOMER & SON TUTU WATER N/A US EPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT DPNR Order in the Matter of the Plaza Associates (ES80002 1-ES800022) DPNR Order in the Matter of AASA Water Supply (Harthman Wells) (ES800023-ES800024) EPA Pollution Report (ES800025-ES800028) EPA News Release (ES800029-ES800030) Memorandum from Michael Mentzel & Cris D'Onofrio, TAT, in reference to a Well Water Sampling Status Report (ES800243-ES800278) DPNR Order in the Matter of Homer & Sons (ES80003 1- ES800032) Letter from the Dept. of Conservation & Cult. Affairs from Alan Smith to Mr. Eric Tillet (ES 800033-ES800034) General Site Safety Plan *TAT-02-F-03956 (ES800279- ES800311) EPA Pollution Report (ES800035-ES80038) ( PAGES DOCUMENTS LIST (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. .,2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/19/87 08/21/87 08/24/87 08/28/87 08/28/87 08/31/87 08/31/87 09/01/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT USEPA VIDPNR USEPA US EPA US EPA MARTINEZ, ARNALDO/RRG. 11 TECH. ASSIS. TEAM SARRIERA, W. & DIAZ, CYMANTHA VIDPNR RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT N/A DPNR US EPA US EPA USEPA RESPONSE ft. PREVENTION US EPA ? VIDPNR TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Results based on Numbers received by T. Perette TAT- Edison (ES800046-ES800055) DPNR Order in the Matter of Esso Standard Oil (ES800039-ES80004 1) EPA Pollution Report (ES800042-ES800045) EPA Pollution Report (ES800056-ES800058) EPA News Release (ES800059-ES800064) Sampling Plan for the Tiitu Well Site prepared by the TAT (ES800069 - ES800075) Sampling Plann for the Tutu Well Site prepared by Wm. Sarriera & Cymantha Diaz (ES800076-ES800104) DPNR Administrative Order for Statement of Motives by Alan D. Smith (ES800105-ES800106) PAGE DOCUMENTS LIST (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. *2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 09/02/87 09/02/87 09/02/87 09/02/87 00/03/87 09/04/87 09/04/87 09/11/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT USEPA V1DPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR US RPA ALLGOOD, I./REQ. II TECH. ASSIS. TEAM & Q. RHYMER /DPNR US EPA USEPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT US EPA VIDPNR VIDPNR VIDPNR US EPA CARLOS O'NEILL/RESPONSE & PREV./US EPA US EPA N/A TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL MAPS DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT EPA Pollution Report (ES800113-ES8001 17) DPNR News Release (ES800107-ES800108) DPNR Order in the Matter of Steele Well (ES800109- ES800110) DPNR Order in the Matter of Harvey Well (ES8001 1 1- ES800112) EPA News Release (ES8001 18) Survey Summary of Well/ Cistern Usage at Tutu Well Site prepared by Isabelle Allgood (ES8001 19-ES800124) EPA Pollution Report (ES800125-ES800128) Map of the Potentiometric surface of Turpentine Run Basin auqlfer in the Tutu area, Eastern St. Thomas, USV1 DOCUMENTS LIST (oriRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NOi DATE OF DOCUMENT 00/17/87 09/18/87 10/14/87 10/16/87 10/22/87 11/06/87 11/13/87 11/19/87 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT VIOPNR US KPA GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS, LTD. WESTON SPER WESTON SPER USEPA RAMSAY MOTORS HABSCHMAN, ROBERT/ ATTNY. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT VIDPNR US EPA TEXACO USEPA USEPA ESSO ROBT. KELLAM/WITCO C. DOLAN/US EPA & P. LANG/DPNR TYPE OF DOCUMENT .EGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT DPNR Order in the Matter of Esso Standard Oil ES800 1 29-ES800 131) EPA Pollution Report (ES800132-ES800135) Quality Assurance Project Plan For Soil Gas Survey, Texaco Service Station Memorandum from Arnaldo Martinez and William Schoellkopf, TAT, in reference to TUTU HSL-MO Sampling of Turpentine Run Aquifer Sampling Plan of TUTU Well Site (ES800352-ES800261) Request for Info. Concerning TUTU Esso Facility (ES800572-ES800582) Material Safety Data Sheets for Kcndall Prod, from Wilco Labs, in response to EPA's REquest for Info, to Ramsay Motors (ES801 1 12-ES801 1 18) Response to Request for Information Concerning Ramsey Motors, Inc. (ES800583-ES800591) PAGE ft LIS1 iCI DOCUMENTS LIS1 (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 42115 NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 11/25/87 11/30/87 12/04/87 12/18/87 12/28/87 01/06/88 01/11/88 01/25/88 01/27/88 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT COM FEDERAL HROCH, W./TEXACO BARBEL ENTER. QEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS LTD. BELGODERE & ASSOC. O'NEILL, C./US EPA BELGODERE & ASSOC. deDIEGO ENCARNACION, JOSE/V.I. HOUSING AUTH. WESTON SPER RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA CAROLINE KWAN US EPA CHRIS DAGGETT/REG. ADMIN. EPA TEXACO DPNR - U.S.V.I. & USEPA S. LUFTIG-EMER.& REM. ESP. DIV. DPNR - U.S.V.I. & USEPA CHRIS DAGGETT/ US EPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT LEGAL REPORT LEGAL REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT overview of Texaco Soil Gas Survey of the Tutu Well field site Response to Request for Information Concerning Texaco Service Station (ES800592-ES800601) Response to Request for Information Concerning O'Henry Cleaners (ES800602-ES800606) Final Report on Results of Soil Gas Survey TUTU, St. Thomas (Revised January 25, 1988) Esso TUTU Service Station Health & Safety Plan Preliminary Assessment & Confirmation of Auth. of CERCLA REmoval Actions Monies for TUTU Well Site from Carlos O'Neill to Stephen Luftig (ES800607-ES8006 16A) Esso TUTU Service Station Soil Vapor Inv. Plan Response to Request for Information Concerning the Virgin Islands ousing Authority (ES800617-ES800627) Memorandum from Amaldo Martinez and Douglas Hcnne, TAT, in reference to TUTU HSL+40 Sampling Results (ES800362-ES800369) PAGE\ DOCUMENTS LIS\ , ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT N6. ^2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 02/05/88 02/23/88 03/01/88 03/02/88 05/ 18/88 05/ 18/88 05/ 18/88 06/01/88 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT COM FEDERAL WESTON SPER ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY JUNKIN, TIMOTHY/ ATTNY. KWAN, CAROLINE/US EPA KWAN, CAROLINE/US EPA LEBRON ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USEPA CAROLYN KWAN/US EPA PRES. RAMSEY MOTORS PRES./CONS. AUTO TEXACO ESSO TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT comments on Esso Tutu soil vapor inv. plan & Q.A. control plan (Dec. 28, 1987) Summary of Laboratory Results For Oil & Water Samples Collected From Tanks, Storm Drains, and Sumps at Gasoline Stations & Auto Body Shops on August 17, 1987 (ES800370-ES800378) Site Analysis: TUTU Wellfleld (Aerial Photographic Interpretation of Tutu Wellfield) Response to Request for Information to Jim Tillet (ES800628-ES800631) Follow-up Information on the Request for Information concerning Ramsey Motors, Inc. (ES800655) Follow -up Information on the Request for Info Concerning Consolidated Auto, Inc. (ES800656-ES800664) Supplement To Revised Action Plan For Tanks Removal Photocopies of Original Chromatograms & Calibration Curves - Esso TUTU PAGE\_ LIST,~i DOCUMENTS LIST ,-HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. .2115 NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 06/01/88 06/ H/88 06/ H/88 06/29/88 06/30/88 07/11/88 08/22/88 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT BELGODERE & ASSOC. BELOODERE & ASSOC. BELGODERE & ASSOC. COM FEDERAL USEPA COM FEDERAL O'NEIL, C./US EPA RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ESSO ESSO ESSO STANDARD OIL USEPA USEPA USEPA WM. MUZYNSKI TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORTS REPORT LEGAL REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT SUPPLEMENT - Photocopies of Original Chromatograms & Calibration Curves - Esso TUTU Project Esso TUTU Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report overview of Esso Soil Gas Survey conducted Apr. 5, 1988 through April 23, 1988 EPA Pollution Report (ES800136-ES800140) comments on Esso Tutu Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report, June 14, 1988 Request for a Twelve Mo. Exemption for TUTU Well Site from O'Neill to Muzynski (ES800665-ES800669) PAGE i x LIST ,cl DOCUMENTS LIST (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 09/ 19/88 09/28/88 10/ 17/88 12/21/88 01/04/89 01/11/89 01/12/89 02/ 10/89 03/07/89 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT QRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROQRAMS CORP. LUFTIO, STEPHEN/ US EPA GRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROGRAMS CORP. US EPA CDM FEDERAL SOIL TECH CORP. GRABER, SCOTT/CDM FED. PROG. CORP. LAURA, CALISE/ MONITORING MGMT./US EPA CDM FEDERAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA CARLOS O'NEILL/ US EPA US EPA US EPA USEPA ESSO CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA CAROLINE KWAN/NY- CARIBB. BRANCH/US EPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT LEGAL LEGAL REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Updated Tech. Review of 9 CERCLA 104(e) Responses - O'Henry Cleaners, Ramsay Motors, Cons. Auto Parts, Rodriguez Auto Parts, Esso, Texaco,... (ES800670- ES800676) Authorization of Additional Trust Fund Monies Tor CERCLA Removal Activ. at TUTU Well Site from Luftig to O'Neill (ES800677-ES800682) Administrative Order on Consent, TUTU Well Field Area by Scott Graber (ES800683-ES800694) EPA Pollution Report (ES800141-ES800H3) Overview of the Tutu Texaco Service Station Soil Vent. Task for the Tank Excavation Program Laboratory Analyses of Soil at TUTU Esso Car Care Center Review of Work Plan for the Removal & Installation of 2 Underground Storage Tanks at TUTU Esso Car Care Center on Dec., 1988 by Scott Graber (ES800695-ES800697) Memorandum from Laura Scallse to Caroline Kwan in Ref. to TUTU Well Field Site Work Plan for the Removal & Installation of 2 Undergound Storage Tanks, Revised 1/13/89 (ES800698-ES800727) Overview of TUTU Texaco Soil Vent. Task for the Tank Excavation Program PAGE LIST,~i DOCUMENTS LIST ,~riRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/13/89 03/21/89 03/24/89 03/24/89 03/31/89 03/31/89 03/31/89 04/ 14/89 04/14/89 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT CDM FEDERAL NUS CORP. NUS CORP. NUS CORP. COM FEDERAL KWAN, CAROLINE/US EPA NUS CORP. COM FEDERAL CDM FEDERAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA SCOTT GRABER/CDM CORP. USEPA USEPA USRPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT comments on water collected from the tank pit during the Putu Texaco Service Station tank excavation Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Laga Building/Department of Education final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Qassett Motors Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - Ramsey Motors CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of 104e Ltr. Response Sampling CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the 104(e) Letter Response Sampling by CDM Fed. Programs Corp. (ES801119-ES801126) Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - TUTU Texaco (REV. No. 0) CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the 104e Itr. Response Sampling Tutu Wellfield Area CLP Sample Ananlysis Data of 104(c) letter PAGE i« LIST i~i DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. -2115 NO. -. DATE OF DOCUMENT 04/24/89 05/01/89 05/26/89 07/24/89 11/01/89 01/31/90 02/02/90 02/ 16/90 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT GRABER, SCOTT/CDM CORP. USEPA NUS CORP. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER PERDRO PANZARDI & ASSOC. COM FEDERAL WESTON COM FEDERAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA USEPA USEPA U.S. Geological Survey USEPA USEPA USEPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Summary of 104(e) Letter Response A Facility Inspections Relating to Underground Storage Tanks in the TUTU Well Field (ES800728-ES800729) EPA Pollution Report (ES800144-ES800146) Final Draft - Preliminary Assessment - TUTU Texaco (REV. No. 1) Proceedings of the Virgin Islands Water Resources Conference Preliminary Site Assessment for L'Henry, Inc CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary, Tutu Wellfleld Area Letter Report of December 1989 photovac sampling of the TUTU well site Description of sampling locations - Tutu Wellfleld site PAGE It DOCUMENTS LIST {oHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. >2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 02/27/90 03/23/90 04/12/90 04/ 17/90 04/20/90 04/24/90 05/21/90 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT COM FEDERAL US EPA ENSECO SOIL TECH. CORP. COM FEDERAL COM FEDERAL TEIC RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA TEXACO N/A ESSO USEPA USEPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT LEGAL LAB DATA LAB DATA REPORT REPORT LETTER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Revised overview rpt. of Esso Tank Excavation Administrative Order, Proceeding Under Section 106(a) of CERCLA General Sampling Guidlines Laboratory Analyses of Tutu Esso Car Care Center Chronology of Events & FPC Oversight thru March 1990 Ltr. Rpt. - Review of Esso Rpt. on Tank Excavation & Soil Sampling Monthly progress report 5/2 1/90 PAGE i^ DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 05/29/90 05/31/90 06/ 19/90 07/05/90 07 / 12/90 07 / 17/90 07/20/90 08/08/90 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT TEIC CDM FEDERAL TEIC USEPA TEIC TERRA VAC TEIC GOLDMAN * ANTONETT1 ETAL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA USPA TEIC ALL Kentucky Fried Chicken of the U. S.V.I. USEPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT LETTER REPORT LETTER LETTER MISC. REPORT LETTER LETTER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Revised sample analysis & monitoring plan Final CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of Soils fit Waters Sampled in 1989 from Texaco Soil, Esso Excav. Pit and Soil, and 104e Ltr. Response Sites (2nd Round) Monthly progress report 6/ 19/90 Notice of Disapproval attendees @ Tutu PRP meeting Preliminary Hydrogeologic Assessment Ex-Fuel 1 lomc Petroleum Fort Mylner Service Station, TUTU St. Thomas Monthly progress report 7/20/90 Letter from Goodman, Antonetti et al re: CERCLA & RCRA regulations PAGE LIST i DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. >2115 NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT OS/ 10/90 08/ 11/90 08/ 17/90 08/ 18/90 08/ 19/90 09/04/90 09/ 19/90 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT US EPA US RPA TEIC US EPA USEPA US EPA SOIL TECH CORP RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT MARIA TANKENSON; GOLDMAN & ANTONICTTI; TEXACO TEIC USEPA TEIC TEIC CHARLOTTE AMALIE ESSO V.I. TYPE OF DOCUMENT xETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LETTER LEGAL REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT ^etter re: water connection Meeting confirmation for 8/20/90 Monthly progress report 8/ 17/90 Monthly progress report 8/ 18/90 Flnalizatlon of SAMP Plan Property Access Agreement Final Report on Laboratory Analysis of Soil for Tank Replacement Work LIST ,ol DOCUMENTS LIST ,oHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. .,2115 NO. S* DATE OF DOCUMENT 09/26/90 10/22/90 10/26/90 12/ 17/90 01/01/91 01/11/91 01/21/91 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT US EPA Region II TEIC D'ANNA, NANCY; CEPADA JOSE; & MCCAY, R. SCOTT COM FEDERAL GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAHTY & MILLER TRIG RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA USEPA AMY R. CHESTER/US EPA USEPA TEIC USEPA USBPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT LETTER LEGAL REPORT REPORT LETTER LETTER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Pollution Report # 16 and Final Monthly progress report 10/22/90 EPA Order which conforms with Section VII 2 of Administative Orders Nos. II-CERCLA-040 1 & RCRA-90- 0401 in ref. to Tillet's Well (ES801065-ES801068) Ltr. Rpt. - Tech. Review of Esso's Revised Tank Excavation and Soil Sampling Rpt. 1st Qtrly. Sampling Rpt., Sept 1990 Project Schedule for Qeraghty & Miller Tutu Well Sampling Monthly progress report 1/21/91 PAGE A< 8\ ,01 DOCUMENTS LI8*k CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NC. >2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 02/19/91 03/19/91 03/20/91 01/05/91 0-1/19/91 05/13/91 05/16/91 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT RAMOS, A./TEIC GRRAGIITY fli MILLER RAMOS, A./TEIC GERAGHTY & MILLER TUTUENV. INVESTIGATION COMM. GERAQHTY & MILLER UNKNOWN RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA TRIG USEPA USEPA US EPA? TEIC UNKNOWN TYPE OF DOCUMENT LETTER LETTER LETTER REPORT LEGAL REPORT MISC. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Monthly progress report 2/19/91 Schedule for 2/9 1 Quarterly Sampling Monthly progress report 3/20/9 1 Re-evaluation of Esso TUTU Soil Gas Survey (Aug. '88), Final CLP Sample Analysis! of Soils & Waters In 1989, and Final Report on Laboratory Analyses of Soil for Tank Replacement Work at Esso (Sept. 1990) Monthly Progess Rep. from TEIC, submitted to EPA from 5/21/90 to 3/20/91 in response to admin. Order-Consent und. RCRA & CERCLA, resp. to request for doc. by Four Winds to Esso on 4/8/91, BSH90001-66. Monthly Prog. Rep.4/ 19/9 1 -9/20/92, (ESI800382-ES57 1 Second Quarter Sampling Report, February 1991, TUTU Wells Site Quarterly Sampling (includes Data Validation Summary Rpt.) Notes PAGE( LIST 4~l DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 05/20/91 05/23/91 06/06/91 06/13/91 06/14/91 06/18/91 06/27/91 08/16/91 08/21/91 08/28/91 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT OARCIA, IVAN/ROY F. WESTON NCDEHNR LAW ENGINEERING, INC. USVI LAW ENGINEERING, INC. USVI NCDEHNR TEXACO US EPA NUS CORP. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT LUIS SANTOS/EPA GREG LUNDBLAD/ANDREX KAY DEDNANT/DEHNR NCDNR ANDREX USEPA US EPA USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT LAB DATA MISC PHONE RECORD LEGAL REPORTS LEGAL CORR REPORT REPORT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Memorandum re:results of February 1990 quarterly sampling of Tutu Well site (ES900121-ES900127) Re: Notice of Violation Tor Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act and Ground Water Standards and Classifications Re: Andrex Industries Facility - Groundwater Assessment Depositions of Campbell Berry Phase IIA Expanded Contamination Assessment Work Plan Depositions of Dorn Abedneg Letter notifying Qreg Lundblad, VP of Andrex, of evironmental violation Revised Solid Waste Disposal at TUTU S/S Report Hazard Ranking System Documentation Record Final Draft, Hazard Ranking System Documentation, TUTU Wcllfield, Volume 1 of 5 (Rev. No. 1) LIST ,_f DOCUMENTS LIST ,_HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. 2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 09/01/91 09/06/91 09/12/91 09/13/91 09/13/91 09/13/91 09/17/91 10/01/91 01/01/92 01/16/92 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER USVI COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC US EPA USVI LAW ENGINEERING, INC. ROY F. WESTON GERAGHTY & MILLER USVI RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TEIC TEIC UNKNOWN ESSO STANDARD OIL USVI LAW ENG. USEPA TEIC TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT REPORT LEGAL REPORT LEGAL LEGAL CORR REPORT REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Revised Sampling (from September 1990) Analysis, and Monitoring Plan for TUTU Wells Third Sampling Report, June 1991, TUTU Wells Site Deposition of Hans Oriol Reports of 7/90 adn 2/91 sampling events at Tutu wellsite; lab data; letters; etc. Deposition of Leonard Reed Disposition of Loenard Reed Record of phone call between Kay Dechant/NCDNR-DEM and a Law employee about Andrex Trip Report - TUTU Wells Site Fourth Sampling Report, October 1991, TUTU Wells Site Deposition of Winston Smith PAGE DOCUMENTS LISTVHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. ^ DATE OF DOCUMENT 01/17/92 01/17/92 02/21/92 03/01/92 03/04/92 03/ 10/92 03/11/92 03/11/92 03/13/92 03/13/92 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT USEPA USV1 CHESTER, AMY R./US EPA GERAGHTY & MILLER TEIC GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER GERAGHTY & MILLER USEPA USV1 RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ESSO STANDARD OIL JOSE CEPADA/ATTNY. TEIC ALL TUTU WELLSITE Dept. of Public Works TUTU WELLSITE ESSO STANDARD OIL USVI TYPE OF DOCUMENT LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL REPORT NOTES LETTER REPORT LETTER LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Continued deposition of of Leonard Reed (Volume II) Deposition of Loenard Reed Volume II TUTU Wells Site Administrative Order on Consent Index No. II-RCRA-Proceeding 7003 & 9003-92-0-101 (ESSO 1073- ES801107) TUTU Service Station Investigation Work Plan Site Access Agreement Tutu Environmental Investigation, St. THomas U.S. Virgin Islands (9 copies) Request for Temporary Authorization of Air Discharge in the Tutu Area Request for temporary authorization of ground water discharge to sanitary sewer in the TUTU area Request for Temporary Authorization of Ground-Water Discharge to Sanitary Sewer in the Tutu Area Continued deposition of Leonard Reed (Volume III) Deposition of Leonard Reed Volume III PAGEr LISl ,. DOCUMENTS LISl ,oHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT ,2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/13/92 03/20/92 03/20/92 03/25/92 04/07/92 04/09/92 05/01/92 06/03/92 06/18/92 08/25/92 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY GERAGHTY & MILLER HOLLAR, BRENDA LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. COM FEDERAL TEIC GERAGHTY & MILLER RAMOS, ANA GLORIA/TEIC LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. KELDER, G. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT ANNA RAMOS/TEIC TEIC ANNA RAMOS/TEIC CHRISTINE WARREN/BUNCOMBE CO. USEPA CAROLINE KWAN/US EPA TEIC CAROLE PETERSON/NY CARIBB. SUPRFND BR. I N/A CEI TYPE OF DOCUMENT .ETTER REPORT LETTER CORR REPORT REPORTS REPORT LEGAL REPORTS MISC. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Ececuted Agreement for the Comprehensive Field nvcstigation or Soil and Ground-Water Quality Tutu Service Station Investigation Work Plan St. Thomas, U.S. V.I. Site Access Agreement TEIC Letter from Project engineers/ Law Envir. to Christine Warren, submitting a municipal discharge permit application to the Metro. Sewerage District (MSD) of Buncombe Co. Community Relations Plan for the TUTU Wells Site [contains news releases) Monthly Progress Report No. 2 for Administrative Order on Consent Fifth Sampling Report, February 1992, TUTU Wells Site Letter to Ana Gloria Ramos, TEIC Designated Coordinator, in reference to the Administrative Order No. 1 1-CERCLA- 00401 & RCRA-90-9003-0401 by Carole Peterson (ES801110-ES801111) Work plan for Contaminant Source Identification and Off- site Ground Water Assessment letter from G. Kelder re: expert services PAGE * n ,ci DOCUMENTS LIST (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT N6. >2115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 08/27/92 09/M/92 09/ 17/92 10/09/92 10/09/92 11/10/92 01/18/93 02/01/93 03/08/93 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT GERAGHTY & MILLER NCDEM COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC HANKINSON, PRANK/ NCDEHNR LAW ENGINEERING, INC. VAN WINKLE ct al DUMA, JOHN GERAGHTY & MILLER RICH, CAROL RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TEIC ANDREX N/A GREG LUNDI3LAD VAN WINKLIC,I3UCK,WALI, ct al ENSCI MORGAN, LEWIS & UOCKIUS TEIC USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT CORR MISC. LETTER CORR CORR MISC. REPORTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Sixth Sampling Report, May 1992, TUTU Wells Site Letter from DEM to Greg Lundblad re: Phase II Assessment Work Plan film packets Phase IIA Assessment Work Plan and Interim Remediation/Buncombe County, North Carolina Letter to Mr. Phil Smith re:status update and revised Scope of Services at the Andrex plant Confidential letter to Ensci Cor. re: Andrex Lab reports from Caribbean Hydro-Tech Technical Memorandum II-Results of Field Program at Tutu Station/ US VI Response to EPA's request for information dated 1/26/93 LIST,,,* DOCUMENTS LIST ^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. DATE OF DOCUMENT 03/18/93 03/18/93 03/ 19/93 03/24/93 03/25/93 04/05/93 04/05/93 04/07/93 04/07/93 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT LAW ENGINEERING, INC. TEIC LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PARKER, ROY/ CEI SCHOTTROFF. ADRIAN/DPNR LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. REED, LEONARD/USVI RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT N/A N/A METRO SEWER. DISTRICT/BUNCOMBE CO. ANDREX WESTERN NC REG. AIR POLL. CONTROL CEI MEMBERS OR TUTU TECH REVIEW COMM. JAM US EMORY/ BUNCOMBE CO CEI TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORTS CORR REPORTS REPORTS REPORTS INTER-VIEW CORR CORR LETTER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT nterim Data Submitted & Progress Report Letter including lab results for Tutu Well Site Investigation Application for Permit to discharge treated ground water Interim Engineering Report-proposed interim treatment system for recovered ground water (2 copies) Application for Air Quality Permit (2 copies) Interview performed by Roy Parker/CEI on April 5, 1993 on James J. Urban Fax transmittal to all Tutu Technical Review Committee Members discussing the upcoming two-day meeting (on April 26&27J Letter answering questions about Andrex Re: TEIC meeting on April 28, 1993 PAGE ^ LIST,, DOCUMENTS LIST ,^HRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT N DATE OF DOCUMENT 04/12/93 04 / 12/93 04/22/93 09/01/93 10/01/93 10/01/93 10/01/93 10/13/93 10/14/93 10/14/93 10/14/93 10/ 14/93 GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT ENSECO ENSECO VIDPNR UNKNOWN BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P. C. HYDROLOQIC ASSOCIATES U.S.A., INC, HYDROLOGIC ASSOCIATES U.S.A..INC. VIRGIN ISLANDS, DISTRICT COURT OF ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLK ARTHUR D. LITTLE RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT RAMSAY RAMSAY CEI COOPER ? FOUR WINDS AND PID/HARTHMAN FOUR WINDS AND PID/HARTHMAN ? RAMSAY MOTORS WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT TRXACO O'HENRI DRYCLEANERS TYPE OF DOCUMENT NVOICES INVOICES CORR FILE REPORT REPORT REPORT LEGAL DOC WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT FEDEX International Airway Bill for lab supplies Chain of Custody form for sampling supplies (bottles.vials, etc.) Letter discussing upcoming Technical Review of data pertaining to the contamination of the Tutu aquifer Information for our files Supplement Site Assessment Program Geohydrologic Analysis and Water Quality Data Geohydrologic Analysis and Water Quality Data Case No. 1989-224 and Case No. 1989-220 Four Winds Plaza Partnership vs. Texaco, Inc. and P.I.D./Hartman vs. Texaco, Inc. Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas c DOCUMENTS LIST (CHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. .,4115 DATE OF DOCUMENT 10/14/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/20/93 10/26/93 12/24/93 4/17/90 not dated GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE ARTHUR D. LITTLE O'CONNOR & LEMOS, P.A. HILLSMAN, MARK RICH, CAROL NCDEM QARCIA, IVAN COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT FOUR WINDS PLAZA T1LLETT GARDENS ANTILLES ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION VARIOUS PEOPLE TUTU WATER WELLS LITIGATION FILE SHARON RICHARDSON AND TERESA LOZINGER ANDREX CARLOS O'NEILL/EPA ALL TYPE OF DOCUMENT WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WORK PLAN FAX MEMO LETTER CORR LAB DATA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Work Plan reports for the Tutu Area in St. Thomas Response of Texaco, Inc. Texaco Caribbean, Inc. and Vernon Morgan to EXXON corporation's Request to Permit Entry Upon Land Rule 34 Physical Inspections By The Laga Defendants Letter regarding Tutu water wels litigation Follow up letter from NCDEM re: Phase HA Assessment Work Plan Memo from Ivan Garcia to Carlos O'Neill to document the transmiltal of Sampling Plan, Site Maps fli Photo vac results 1987-90 Tutu Lateral Waterline Contract PAGE 2 / DOCUMENTS LISTVHRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. , DATE OF DOCUMENT not dated not dated not dated not dated not dated not dated not dated not dated not dated GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT OERAQHTY & MILLER NCDEM UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN USEPA USVI RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT TUTU SERVICE STATION NCDEM UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN USEPA ATTY-S TYPE OF DOCUMENT MAPS LAB DATA LAB DATA INVOICES MAPS MAPS MISC. LEGAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Map or Tutu Service Station showing well, soil borings, etc. Leak Reporting Form on Andrex Industries, for leak occuring on 4/ 19/9 1 Notes Blank commercial invoice Close up of Central St. Thomas Closer up or Central St. Thomas Notes from deposition of Winston Smith EPA News Release (ES80OO65-800068) Interrogations and demands Tor production of documents PAGE DOCUMENTS LISTVriRONOLOGICAL) RAMSAY MOTORS ANNA'S RETREAT ST. THOMAS, USVI CEI PROJECT NO. . .4115 DATE OF DOCUMENT undated GENERATOR OF DOCUMENT BELQODERE & ASSOC. RECIPIENT OF DOCUMENT USEPA TYPE OF DOCUMENT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Esso TUTU Car Care Center Investigation Plan, Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Plan Additional Notes About Networks This document contains information about specific networks. If you are looking for additional information about Windows version 3.1 that does not pertain to networks, see "Other Online Documents" at the end of this file for a description of the Windows 3.1 online documents.s W ri TABLE I UST/AST TABLE * Tanks with Year Installed in parentheses () have been closed. Name, Address ID Number (Former Walker's Gulf) BP Oil Company # 21466 1500 East Franklin Street 0-023028 (Miller's Texaco) Village Texaco US 15-501 and Estes Dr. 0-020451 Chapel Hill Parks and Recreation Department 200 Plant Road 0-022268 Distance Direction West 1/8 mile West 1/4 mile NE 1/8 mile Topo Relation level with the subject property level with the subject property up- gradient Regist. List UST UST UST # 11 10 3 Reg. Y/N Yes Yes Yes Leak List No No No Size (gal) 550 550 550 550 6000 10000 6000 10000 6000 10000 10000 8000 1000 9999 8000 8000 550 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 500 1200 Contents diesel kerosene other auto other auto gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline diesel gasoline gasoline fuel oil other auto gasoline gasoline other auto gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline diesel other auto other auto, fuels Type steel unknw steel unknw steel unknw steel unknw steel fibglas steel steel fibglas fibglas steel steel steel fibglas fibglas fibglas fibglas steel steel steel 1-1 Belk Hudson Leggett Co. University Mall 0-020516 Belk Leggett Company Estes Drive 0-031899 Sunrise Biscuit Kitchen 1305 East Franklin Street 0-020781 Zip Mart # 20 1501 East Franklin Street 0-022633 Etna Self Serve 1509 East Franklin Street 0-022633 East 1/8 mile East 1/8 mile SW 1/8 mile NW 1/8 mile NW 1/4 mile level with subject property level with subject property down- gradient up-gradient up-gradient UST UST UST UST UST 1 1 2 9 7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No 250 500 8000 8000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 8000 12000 12000 12000 12000 8000 8000 8000 unknown other auto fuels, oils gasoline gasoline diesel diesel gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline gasoline steel steel steel steel steel fibglas steel fibglas steel fibglas steel fibglas fibglas steel steel steel steel steel steel steel 1-2 TABLEn ASBESTOS SAMPLING TABLE Suspect ACM Material Sampled Floor tile - White Floor tile - Black Ceiling tile - gray & white Ceiling tile - white 8e brown Ceiling tile - gray and white Pipe Wrapping (orange) Pipe Wrapping (green) Pipe Wrapping (gray) Sample # and Location PO-1 Janitor's closet and back offices PO-2 Warehouse/ Dispatch Area PO-3 Office Area PO-4 Mailbox Area PO-5 Reception Area PO-6 Boiler Room PO-7 Boiler Room PO-8 Loading Dock Area Analyzed Yes/ No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lab Results (% and Type) None Detected 15% None Detected None Detected None Detected 5% 5% 5% Estimated Quantity of ACM 17,096 sq. feet (2/3 of the building unknown unknown unknown Friable Yes/ No no yes yes yes Physical Condition good poor poor poor Fiber Releasing Potential low high high high II-1 TABLE 1C List of Recorded Sites Name, Address ID Number Gene Care Medical Center 120 Corner Drive 3688226 Plaza Laundry and Cleaners 1 1 1 Elliott Road 333183 Millers Texaco Retail Facility US 15-501 Bypass and Estes Drive 5371 Bailey's Cleaners University Mall UNC HMF Building 488 Estes Drive 437499 Walker's Gulf (Current BP) 1500 East Franklin Street 6469 Sunrise Biscuit Kitchen 1305 East Franklin Street 0-020781 Distance Direction North 1/4 mile NorthEast 1/2 mile West 1/4 mile East 1/8 mile East 1/4 mile West 1/8 mile SouthWest 1/4 mile Database FINDS, RCRA FINDS, RCRA FINDS, RCRA, LUST FINDS RCRA LUST UST Comments Generates less than 100 kg./mo. of non-acutely haz. waste. Generates less than 100 kg./mo. of non-acutely haz. waste, Ground Water contamination from gasoline UST. Generates less than 100 kg./mo. of non- acutely haz. waste Hazardous Waste Generates at least 100kg/ mo. of non-acutely haz. waste ( or 1 kg/ mo. of acutely haz. waste), This handler has violations outstanding in the Corrective Action Compliance Schedule Area. Ground Water contamination from leaking gasoline UST 2 tanks closed and removed, no leaks reported III-l BP Oil Company #24166 (Walker's Gulf) 1500 East Franklin Street 0-023028 Zip Mart # 20 1501 East Franklin Street 0-022633 Etna Self Serve 1509 East Franklin Street 0-023141 Belk Leggett Company Estes Drive 0-031899 Village Texaco US 15-501 and Estes Drive 0-020451 Chapel Hill Parks and Recreation Department 200 Plant Road 0-022268 Belk Hudson Leggett Co. University Mall 0-020516 West 1/8 mile NorthWest 1/4 mile NorthWest 1/4 mile East 1/8 mile West 1/8 mile NorthEast 1/4 mile East 1/8 mile UST UST UST UST UST UST UST 1 1 tanks, six removed and five active, leaks reported from former gas station, Walkers Gulf, before BP owned the site 9 tanks, five active and four closed, no leaks reported 7 tanks, all active, no leaks reported 1 tank , no leak reported 10 tanks, four closed and six active, no leaks reported 3 tanks, no leaks reported 1 tank active, no leaks reported ni-2 APPENDIX II Letter Explaining Similarities and Differences Between SW-846 and CLP-SOW Methods Enseco East AUG 24, 1993^EnsecD A Corning Company Mr. John Burkhart Cooper Environmental 2300 Sardis Road North Suite Q Charlotte, NC 28227 Re: Methodology Comparison, CLP vs. SW-846 Dear Mr. Burkhart Enclosed, please find method comparisons for volatile and semi-volatile analyses in a soil matrix. Section I explains the variables/conditions for CLP analysis, Section II contains the variables/conditions for the SW-846 methods. If you need any additional information please feel free to contact me at (908) 469-5800. Sincerely, Alicia C. Pirrocco Program Manager cc: D.Flynn, Enseco, Inc. Enseco Incorporated 2200 Cottontail Lane Somerset, N'evv Jersey 08873-1252 90S'469-5800 Fax:908469-7516 ^•Enseco A Coming Cotnpjru SECTION I - CLP METHODS Volatile 3/90 CLP (modded 12/90 and 2/91) / Variable Default Condition INITIATION Sample Container Preservative Holding Time Holding Time Start Sample Storage Sample Disposal Cha1n-of-Custody Not specified Minimum Headspace, stored away from light at 4°C (+2°C). VGA samples must be stored separately from other samples. Unused Samples at 4*C for 60 days after data delivered to EPA Analysis of all samples must be complete within 10 days VTSR 4°C (+2°C). A holding blank should be done for each case. After 60 days from delivery of data EPA Traffic Reports, A1r Bills, and Sample Tags PREPARATION Sample Pre-treatment Extraction Technique Solvent pH Conditions Sample Size for analysis Dilution Techniques Screening Requirements Soils NOT Decanted; Samples warmed to Room Temp, prior to analysis, Xmolsture of Soils MED Soils only (>10,000 ug/kg contaminant) MeOH As received Waters = 5 ml; MED Soil = 4g followed by MeOH extraction - £ 100 uL of MeOH extract + Reagent water to purge 5mL sample; LOW = l-5g + 5mL Reagent water. Volumetric serial dilution required. Optional ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Instrumentation Mass Range GC/MS/DS 35 to 300 amu 1- CLP 3/90 Volatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0. Mav 1001 Variable Default Condition Scan PTD Conditions GC Conditions Column Type Operating Conditions Injection Technique Tuning Component(s) Acquisition Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Initial Calibration Component List Number of Points Concentration Requirements Acceptance Criteria Frequency Rate of acquisition - at least 5 spectra/ compound, not to exceed 1 sec/scan Specified as: Purge Gas = N2 or He; Purge time = 11.0 + 0.1 m1n; Purge flow (option) = 25-40 mL/min; Purge Temp = ambient for waters/MED soils, 40°C LOW soils; Desorb Temp.=1808C; Oesorb Flow = 15 mL/m1n; Desorb Time = 4.0 + 0.1 m1n; Reconditioning Temp. = 180°C; Recond. Time = 7.0 + 0.1 m1n Packed or Cap.Column. Packed = 6' X 0.1" ID glass with 1% SP-1000 on Carbopack B, or equivalent. Cap = 30m X 0.52 mm ID VOCOL or DB-624 fused silica with 3u film thickness RECOMMENDED for Cap. Column: Temp. Prog. = 10°C (l-5m1n) to 160°C at 6°C/m1n; hold at 160°C until all TCLs elute Carrier Gas = He at 15 mL/m1n NOTE: Subamblent oven controller required?? PTD or direct allowed of BFB BFB at 50 ng either by direct Inject or by adding 50ng to 5.0 mL water and analyzing by PTD (can't be in CC std) Mass Spec acquired by averaging 3 peaks across center of BFB and by background subtracting 1 scan prior to elution of BFB Table 1 (D-25/VOA)/FORM V VOA Every 12 hours Replace 1n 6 months, or sooner FORM VI VOA ( TCLs + SMC) 5-Level 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 ug/L 1n MeOH M1n RRF, Max XRSD criteria for most cpds (Table 2 (D-28/VOA). Up to 2 TCLs may be out but m1n RRF ^ 0.010 and XRSD £ 40%. At beginning of contract and If CC std falls. Separate ICAL for LOW soils and Waters and MED Soils required. 2- CLP 3/90 VolatHes modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition Standard Integrity Continuing Calibration Frequency Concentration Acceptance Criteria Standard Integrity Aqueous standards stored at 4°C (+2°C), for up to 24 hours with zero headspace. Stocks stored at -10 to -20°C for up to 6 months. Every 12 Hours 50 ug/L %D relative to ICAL < + 25%. Up to 2 TCLs can be out but must have M1n. RRF >0.010 and %0 £ 40% Store at 4°C, prepare fresh dally Analytical Run Sequence What constitutes sequence What 1s acceptable run Linearity? Quant1tat1on Technique Dally vs. Average Rfs 12 hour sequence from Tune based on Injection. Following ICAL or CC, must analyze a system MB prior to samples. 1) IS RTs/Areas 1n sample agree with CC std (FORM VIII VGA) 2) TCLs within calibration range, If diluted largest TCL within upper half of range 3) SMCs all within QC limits Dilute until largest TCL within upper half of calibration range DO NOT DILUTE MS/MSDs Internal Standard Dally QUALITY CONTROL Blanks Type(s) Required Frequency Criteria MB (extracted for MED soils), Holding Blank, Methanol Blank MB: every 12 hours/GC/MS systejn at a minimum. If a saturated sample Is run, MB must be analyzed following sample to check for carryover. Holding blank: 1 per case (results kept and used by lab to check contamination) Methanol Blank: 1/MED level extraction batch Extracted MB: 1//MED level extraction batch All Blanks: SMCs all 1n; Must not contain ^ 5 X CRQL of Methylene Chloride, Acetone, 2-Butanone or > CRQL for all other TCLs. 3- CLP 3/90 Volatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition Matrix Spikes Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spike Concentration of Spike Frequency Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity MB: Waters = 5.0ml Reagent Water spiked with IS and SMCs. LOW Soils = 5g Purified solid 1n 5 mL water spiked with IS and SMCs. MED Soil = Ig Purified solid spiked with SMC then extracted with MeOH and analyzed following addition of IS. Holding Blank = VOA vial filled with water Methanol Blank = ImL of reagent methanol l,l-D1chloroethene, Trlchloroethene, Chlorobenzene, Toluene, and Benzene at 25.0 ug/mL 1n MeOH. Waters/LOW Soils = 10 uL; MED Soils = 1.0 ml Waters/LOW soils 50 ng/mL, MED Soils variable. MS/MSD required/case up to 20 samples for each group of samples of a similar matrix Advisory limits for XREC, XRPD - Never reanalyze even 1f IS criteria not met. MS/MSD should be run undiluted. Store at -10 to -20°C, replace 1n 6 months, or sooner System Monitoring Compounds Frequency Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spiking Concentration of Spike Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity In all samples, MS/MSDs, and MBs Toluene-08, p-Bromofluorobenzene, and l,2-D1chloroethane-D4 at 25.0 ug/mL 1n MeOH 10 uL Into 5mL sample for Waters and LOW soils, MED Soils = 1.0 mL prior to extraction. Waters/LOW soils 50 ng/mL, MED Soils variable. All must be within QC limits. Store at -10 to -20°C, replace 1n 3 months, or sooner Requirements to verify Method Performance MDL Studies Not required Acceptability criteria PEs/SOPs/QAPP for Contract 4- CLP 3/90 Volatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable REPORTING ~~~~ / Dellverables C-O-C Log-In Tune Initial Calibration Continuing Calibration Sample Chromatograms/F1les Log-Book pages Prep Instrument Administrative Data Sheets and Format Administrative Electronic Requirements Default Condition Executed Traffic Reports (copy due to SMO 3 days after last sample In SDG received and 1n final package), EPA C-O-C, Airbills, and Sample Tags + Internal C-O-C. DC-1 FORM, Lab Log-In Sheets, SDG Cover Sheet FORM V VOA, Mass 11st and Bar Graph FORM VI VOA, Labeled RICs, Data System Report, Correct Headers (e.g., VSTD#I#) FORM VII VOA, Labeled RIC, Data System Report, Correct headers Correct Headers, Labeled RICs normalized to largest non-solvent peak, Data System Printout (Quant files, etc.), Spectra of TCL hit (Raw and Background subtracted), and Standard Spectra, TICs for all Samples, DL, RE, MBs. MS/MSD need all except Spectra of hits and TICs Originals In CSF unless bound logbook Bench sheets, sample transfer records, Screening Info Including, strip charts, log book copies. Transfer records, Instrument logs (GPC, Screening and GC/MS) Telephone contact logs/notes on project. FORM I VOA and FORM I VOA-TIC (Samples [DL and RE], MBs, MS/MSDs) with qualifiers; FORMS II VOA, III VOA, IV VOA, VIII VOA SDG Narrative, FORM DC-2 Diskette delivered with data and Mag. Tapes of GC/MS all raw data with Inventory 5- CLP 3/90 Volatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 SemlVoa 3/90 CLP (modded 12/90 and 2/91) Variable INITIATION Sample Container Preservative Holding Time Holding Time Start Sample Storage Sample Disposal Cha1n-of-Custody Default Condition Not specified Away from light, stored at 4°C (+2°C) Unused Samples at 4°C for 60 days after data delivered to EPA Extracts (labeled and Inventoried) at 4°C for 365 days after data delivered Prep: Waters started within 5 days Soils complete within 10 days Analytical: 40 days after extraction VTSR 4°C (+2°C) After 60 days from delivery of data EPA Traffic Reports, A1r Bills, and Sample Tags PREPARATION Sample Pre-treatment Extraction Technique Solvent pH Conditions Sample Size Final Volume Concentration Techniques Cleanup Requirements Screening Requirements Soils Decanted; Screening for LOW/MED pH and Xmolsture of Soils Waters = CLLE; Soils = Son1 cation (MED = mlcrotlp) Waters/MED Soil = MeCl2; LOW Soils = MeC12/Acetone Waters = pH 2, soils as received Waters = l.OL; MED Soil = Ig; LOW = 30g Waters without GPC » 1000 uL; Soils and Waters through GPC = 500 uL KD and/or N2 blowdown (solvent exchange required for LOW soils) GPC for Soils, optional for Waters Water extracts optional, required for soils 1- CLP 3/90 Semlvolatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLMOl.l and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Instrumentation Mass Range Scan Time GC Conditions Column Type Operating Conditions GC/MS/DS and Screening Inst. (GC/MS or GC/FID) 35 to 500 amu not to exceed 1 sec/scan 30m X 0.25mm ID or 0.32mm ID fused-s1!1ca bonded column with lu or 0.25 u film thickness RECOMMENDED: Temp. Prog. = 40°C (4m1n) to 270°C at !0°C/m1n; hold at 270°C for 10 m1n. GC Injector and Transfer Line » 250-300°C Carrier Gas = He at 30 mL/m1n Injection Technique Injection Volume Tuning Component(s) Acquisition Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Initial Calibration Component List Number of Points Concentration Requirements Acceptance Criteria Frequency Grob-type, spHtless Injection MANDATORY 2 uL DFTPP 'at 50 ng (separate solution or within CC standard) Mass Spec acquired by averaging 3 peaks across center of DFTPP and by background subtracting 1 scan prior to elutlon of DFTPP Table 1 (D-40/SV)/FORM V SV Every 12 hours No Hm1t given unless 1n CC std. FORM VI SV ( TCLs + Surrogates) 5-Level except for 8 TCLs not requiring 20 ng 20, 50, 80, 120, and 160 ng for 2uL Inject Mln RRF, Max XRSD criteria for most cpds (Table 5 (D-46/SV). Up to 4 TCLs/Surrogate may not hit criteria; however, M1n. RRF > 0.010 and XRSD £ 40X At beginning of contract and If CC std falls 2- CLP 3/90 Semlvolallies modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition ^tandard Integrity Continuing Calibration Frequency Concentration Acceptance Criteria Standard Integrity Store at -10 to -20°C, amber bottles, replace every 12 months or sooner Every 12 Hours 50 ng for 2 uL Inject XD relative to ICAL < 25X. Up to 4 TCLs/surrogates can be out but must have Mln. RRF >0.010 and XD £ 40% Store at 4°C, prepare fresh weekly Analytical Run Sequence What constitutes sequence What 1s acceptable run Linearity? Quant1tat1on Technique Dally vs. Average Rfs 12 hour sequence from Tune based on Injection 1) IS RTs/Areas 1n sample agree with CC std (FORM VIII SV) (exception with reextract and reanalysls with same result) 2) TCLs within calibration range, 1f diluted largest TCL within upper half of range 3) Surrogates (1 out allowed 1n each of Add and BN surr., QC advisory out OK) Dilute until largest TCL within upper half of calibration range DO NOT DILUTE MS/MSDs Internal Standard Dally QUALITY CONTROL Blanks Type(s) Required Frequency Criteria MB and GPC Blank MB: each case, or each 14 days that samples arrive for a case, or each 2Q samples (Including MS/MSD/Re-extract1ons) that are of a similar matrix/concentration level or whenever samples are extracted by a particular extraction method. MB must be analyzed by each GC/MS that samples are analyzed on. GPC: At least once/week MB: Surrogates must meet acceptance criteria and any TCL £ CRQL except for phthalate esters which must be £ 5 X CRQL. GPC: TCL £ 0.5 X CRQL 3- CLP 3/90 Semlvolatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition Composition Matrix Spikes Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spike Concentration of Spike Frequency Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity MB: Waters * l.OL Reagent Water spiked with surrogates. MED Soils = Ig Powdered sodium sulfate; LOW Soil = 30g Powdered sodium sulfate each spiked with surrogates. GPC: MeCl2 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene, Acenaphthene, 2,4- Dlnltrotoluene, Pyrene, N-N1troso-d1-n- propylamlne, and 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene at 100 ug/mL each In MeOH; Pentachlorophenol, Phenol, 2-Chlorophenol, 4-Chloro-3- methylphenol, and 4-N1trophenol at 150 ug/mL each 1n MeOH. 0.5 mL Adds 150 ng, BN 100 ng for 2 uL Inject MS/MSD required at frequency similar to MB. Advisory limits for IREC, %RPD - Never reanalyze even 1f IS criteria not met. MS/MSD should be run undiluted. Store at 4C (+2C), replace 1n 12 months, or sooner Surrogates Frequency Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spiking Concentration of Spike Criteria for Acceptability GPC Calibration Frequency Component/Cone In all samples, MS/MSDs, and MBs Nitrobenzene-05, Terphenyl-D14, 2- Fluoroblphenyl, and l,2-D1chlorobenzene-D4 at lOOug/mL; Phenol-05, 2,4,6-Trlbromo- phenol, 2-Fluorophenol, and 2-Chlorophenol- 04 at 150 ug/mL. 0.5 mL 100 ng and 150 ng 1n 2uL Inject 1 out of BN, 1 out of Acid, Advisory surrogates out OK. Calibrate at least once/week. Corn 011 (25.0 mg/mL); B1s(2-ethylhexyl)- phthalate (1.0 mg/mL); Methoxychlor (0.2 mg/mL); Perylene (0.02 mg/mL); Sulfur (optional at 0.08 mg/mL) 1n MeC12. 4- CLP 3/90 Seraivolatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity All peaks observed and symmetrical; Corn oil and phthalate must exhibit >85X resolution, phthalate and methoxychlor must exhibit >85X resolution; Methoxychlor and Perylene must exhibit >85X resolution; and Perylene and Sulfur must not be saturated and must exhibit >90% resolution. RT of call.cpds MUST be within +5X of the RTs from the previous GPC calibration. Replace every 6 months, or sooner. Requirements to verify Method Performance MDL Studies Not required Acceptability criteria PEs/SOPs/QAPP for Contract REPORTING Dellverables C-O-C Log-In Tune Initial Calibration Continuing Calibration Sample Chromatograms/Flles Log-Book pages Prep Instrument Executed Traffic Reports (copy due to SMO 3 days after last sample 1n SDG received and 1n final package), EPA C-O-C, Airbills, and Sample Tags + Internal C-O-C. DC-1 FORM, Lab Log-In Sheets, SDG Cover Sheet FORM V SV, Mass 11st and Bar Graph FORM VI SV, Labeled RICs, Data System Report Correct headers (e.g., SSTD###) FORM VII SV, Labeled RIC, Data System Report, Correct headers + GPC calibration data Correct Headers, Labeled RICs normalized to largest non-solvent peak, Data System Printout (Quant files, etc.), Spectra of TCL hit (Raw and Background subtracted), and Standard Spectra, TICs for all Samples, DL, RE, MBs. MS/MSD need all except Spectra of hits and TICs Originals 1n CSF unless bound logbook Bench sheets, sample transfer records, Screening Info Including, strip charts, log book copies. Transfer records, Instrument logs (GPC, Screening and GC/MS) 5- CLP 3/90 Sem1volat1les modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLM01.1 and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 Variable Default Condition / Administrative Telephone contact logs/notes on project. Data Sheets and Format FORM I SV and FORM I SV-TIC (Samples [DL and RE], MBs, MS/MSDs) with appropriate qualifiers; FORMS II SV, III SV, IV SV, VIII SV Administrative SDG Narrative, FORM DC-2 Electronic Requirements Diskette delivered with data and Mag. Tapes of GC/MS all raw data with Inventory 6- CLP 3/90 Semlvolatlles modded 12/90 and 2/91 (OLM01.0 with OLMOl.l and OLM01.1.1 mods) Revision 0, May 1991 A Owning Company SECTION II - SW-846 METHODS Method 8240, Rev.O, 9/86 Variable Default Condition INITIATION Sample Container Preservative Holding Time Holding Time Start Sample Storage Sample Disposal Chain-of-Custody Soils/sediments and sludges: 4 oz wldemouth glass with Teflon Uner; Concentrated Waste samples: 8 oz widemouth glass with Teflon liner; Liquid Samples: 2 X 40 ml vials with Teflon lined septum caps Soils/sediments and sludges - cool to 4°C; Concentrated Wastes - none; Liquids with no residual chlorine present -4 drops cone. HCL, and cool to 4°C; Liquids with residual chlorine - collect sample 1n a 4 oz VOA container which has been pre-preserved with 4 drops of 10% sodium thlosulfate, gently mix and transfer to 40 mL VOA vials that have been pre- preserved with 4 drops of cone. HC1, and cool to 4°C; Liquid samples containing Acrolein and Acrlyon1tr1le - adjust to pH 4-5, and cool to 4°C 14 days Sample Collection 48C None specified Not explicitly specified; however, field operations responsible for correct Chain- of-Custody forms being sent to lab. PREPARATION Sample Pre-treatment Extraction Technique Solvent pH Conditions Soils NOT Decanted; Samples warmed to Room Temp, prior to analysis; and %mo1sture of Soils (not decanted). High Soil/sediments and wastes only (> 1 mg/kg contaminant) MeOH As received - see Preservative above 1- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Sample Size for analysis Dilution Techniques Screening Requirements Waters = 5 ml or an appropriate aliquot diluted to 5 ml with reagent water; HIGH soil/sediments and methanol Immiscible wastes = 4g of sample 1s extracted with MeOH and an aliquot (100 uL or a fraction of 100 uL diluted to 100 uL with MeOH) of the extract Is added to 4.9 ml reagent water and analyzed; Wastes that are mlsdble 1n MeOH = follow procedure for HIGH soil/sediments using Ig of sample Instead of 4g; LOW soil/sediments and wastes = l-5g sample + 5 ml reagent water. Volumetric serial dilution or preparation directly Into syringe (20 ul_£ aliquot of sample £ 100 uL). Optional. It's suggested that headspace with GC/PID 1n series with HECD or hexadecane extraction and screening by GC/FID or GC/ECD be used. ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Instrumentation Mass Range Scan Time PTD Conditions GC Conditions Column Type Operating Conditions GC/MS/DS Recommend: 35 to 260 amu Recommend: To give 5 scans/peak, but not to exceed 7 sec/scan Specified as: Purge Gas = Inert gas; Purge time = 11.0 + 0.1 m1n; Purge flow = 25-40 mL/m1n (optimize for bromofonn and chloro- methane response); Purge Temp * ambient for waters and HIGH soils/wastes, 40 + 1°C for LOW soils; Desorb Temp. = 180°C; Desorb Flow * 20-60 mL/m1n; Desorb Time = 4.0 m1n; Reconditioning Temp. = 180-220'C; Recond. Time = ~7.0 m1n. Packed Column = 6' X 0.1" ID glass with 1% SP-1000 on Carbopack B (60/80 mesh), or equivalent. RECOMMENDED: Temp. Prog. = 45eC (for 3 m1n) to 220°C at 8°C/m1n; hold at 220°C for 15 m1n. Carrier Gas = He at 30 cm/sec or H2 at 50 cm/sec. If trap desorptlon 1s not fast enough, GC column MUST be used as a secondary trap by cooling 1t to 30°C, or subamblent, Instead of starting at 45°C. 2- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/8« Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Injection Technique Tuning Component(s) Acquisition Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Initial Calibration Component List Number of Points Concentration Requirements Acceptance Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Continuing Calibration Frequency PTO or direct Injection. Direct Injection of sample reserved for high concentrations, for determining alcohol content of a sample prior to 1gn1tab1Hty test, or for water soluble compounds that don't purge. Direct Injection of BFB always allowed. BFB at 50 ng either by direct Inject or by adding 50ng to 5.0 ml water and analyzing by PTD (no Indication that 1t can't be in the CC std). None specified Table 3 (8240-12) (old criteria) Every 12 hours Keep at -10 to -20°C, replace 1n 6 months, or sooner, 1f there's a problem. Not specified. Some or all of the compounds listed 1n Table 1 may be Included. 5-Level Unspecified; however, one of the levels should near, but above, the MDL. All others should define the working range. Average RFs for Chloromethane, 1,1- Dlchloroethane, 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane and Chlorobenzene ]> 0.300 and Bromoform ^ 0.250 (SPCC criteria); and XRSD for 1,1- Dlchloroethene, Chloroform, l,2-D1chloro- propane, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Vinyl Chloride <30X (CCC criteria). At beginning of performing method and 1f CC std falls. Separate ICAL for LOW soils, HIGH soils and Waters required. HIGH soils procedure requires standards contain 100 uL of methanol. May be stored for 1 week only 1n a vial with no headspace. Stocks should be stored at -10 to -20°C for up to 2 months, for gases and reactive compounds, and up to 6 months for all other compounds. Every 12 Hours 3- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Concentration Acceptance Criteria Mid-level concentration. HIGH soils procedure requires standard contain 100 of methanol. uL Standard Integrity Analytical Run Sequence What constitutes sequence What 1s acceptable run Linearity? Quantitation Technique Daily vs. Average RFs What Is an acceptable ID %D relative to ICAL < 25% for CCCs; min RF for SPCCs must be met; RT for ISs must not be > + 30 sec from last CC standard; and EICP area of an IS must not change by more than -50% to + 100% from last CC standard. May be stored no longer than 1 week in a vial with minimal headspace. 12 hour sequence from Tune based on Injection. 1) Analytes within calibration range. If diluted, largest analyte within upper half of range; 2) Surrogates for aqueous and soil matrices within QC limits given In Table 8 (8240- 38); for other matrices, recoveries within lab generated limits; 3) Standard criteria met and the samples analyzed within 12 hour tune. Dilute until largest analyte of interest 1s within upper half of calibration range. Internal Standard. Recommend: Bromochloro- methane, 1,4-Difluorobenzene, and Chloro- benzene-D5 at 25 mg/L in MeOH. Spike lOuL for each 5 ml sample (50 ug/L in sample). Average RFs from ICAL (oversight in method - ERA believes should use dally RFs but method ambiguous). Compare sample Mass Spec with that of a standard obtained from the daily CC standard - two criteria must be satisfied for qualitative ID: sample RRT must be within +0.06 RRT units of the standard RRT; and all Ions 1n the standard with relative Intensities >10% must be In the sample and these Intensities must agree to + 20% For Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) the following criteria apply: major Ions (>10%) 1n library spectrum should be 1n sample spectrum and agree to + 20% In terms of relative Intensities; molecular Ions 1n the library spectrum should be In the sample spectrum; and ions In the sample and not In the library (and vice versa) should be reviewed and their importance evaluated. 4- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Default Condition QUALITY CONTROL Blanks Type(s) Required Frequency Criteria Composition Matrix, Spikes Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spike Concentration of Spike Frequency Criteria for Acceptability MB and Reagent Blank. MB: for each batch of samples (Methanol Blank = I/HIGH level extraction batch). Reagent blank: If a saturated 1on response 1s obtained from a sample, a reagent blank must be analyzed following the sample to check for carryover. All Blanks: Surrogates within limits for waters and soils (Table 8) and within lab generated limits for other matrices. Explicit Interference limits for blanks not given. Reagent blanks: sample analysis should not resume until the system 1s free of Interferences. MB: Waters and LOW soils/sediments * S.OmL Reagent Water; HIGH soils/sediments =1.0 mL of MeOH. Reagent Blank » 5.0 mL reagent water. If Regulatory Compliance monitoring Is being" performed, the matrix spike should contain each analyte of Interest at the regulatory level or 1-5 times higher than the back- ground concentration, whichever 1s higher. If not looking at Regulatory Compliance, recommend: 1,1-01chloroethene, Trlchloro- ethene, Chlorobenzene, Toluene, and Benzene at 25.0 ug/mL In MeOH. Waters/LOW Soils = 10 uL; HIGH Soils = 1.0 mL prior to extraction. Variable. MS/MSD required/batch If performing compliance monitoring, and one or more of the analytes are not within acceptance criteria, a new single QC check sample, containing only those analytes that failed, must be analyzed and those results compared to Table 6. If analyte 1s still out, lab 1s out-of-control and corrective action must take place (the result for that analyte In the unsplked sample must be flagged as being suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance 5- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Standard Integrity Surrogates Frequency Components/Cone, in Spike Level of Spiking Concentration of Spike Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity Default Condition purposes). If QC check good, may infer matrix effect presumably. If not performing compliance monitoring, if the LCS or QC Check result for that analyte 1s also not within limits, the lab is out- of-control and corrective action must occur. If the LCS or QC Check result for that analyte Is within limits, a matrix effect may be Inferred (NOTE: LCS NOT REQUIRED FOR PERFORMANCE OF THIS MODIFICATION OF THE METHOD). Matrlx-by-matrix recovery limits must be generated by lab on a regular basis (every 5-10 samples of same matrix). Store at -10 to -20°C, replace after 2 months, for gases and reactive compounds, and after 6 months for all other compounds. In all samples, MS/MSDs, standards, and MBs Recommend: Toluene-08, p-Bromofluorobenzene, and l,2-D1chloroethane-D4 at 25.0 ug/mL in MeOH Waters and LOW Soils = 10 uL; HIGH Soils = 1.0 mL prior to extraction. Waters « 50 ng/mL, Soils variable based on sample size. All must be within QC limits. For soils and waters, limits given 1n Table 8 may be used, for other matrices, limits developed by lab should be used. All QC limits should be updated annually. If a surrogate 1s outside of QC limits: check calculations, standards, Instrument performance, etc., correct problems uncovered and reanalyze sample. If no problem is found, either reextract and reanalyze sample or flag data as "estimated concentration". Store at -10 to -20°C, replace after 2 months, for gases and reactive compounds, and after 6 months for all other compounds. Requirements to verify Method Performance MDL Studies Matrix-specific MDLs required for all analytes being reported - Chapter One indicates a minimum of 3 analyses on a matrix spike containing the analytes of 6- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable Acceptability criteria Frequency Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spiking Concentration of Spike Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity Default Condition Interest at 3-5 times the estimated MDL 1s required. MDL = (one-sided Student's t value at 99% confidence Interval for n-1 degrees of freedom)(standard deviation of the replicate measurements). This definition adopted from SW-846 Update I as recommended by MICE. Through analysis of QC Check samples to determine accuracy and precision. Each analyst must make an Initial one-time demonstration of their ability to generate data with acceptable accuracy and precision. If the method Is changed (e.g., a new GC column type used), the quadrup- licate QC check sample analysis must be repeated. If MS recoveries are not within limits, a single QC Check sample, containing only those MS compounds that were out, must be analyzed to verify whether or not the analytical system was 1n control (for compliance monitoring only - LCS may be used Instead of QC check otherwise). QC Concentrate = each analyte of Interest at 10 mg/L 1n MeOH. Should be prepared from an Independent source from which the calibration standards are made. 200 uL Into lOOmL of reagent water. Four 5-mL allquots are analyzed same as water samples. Each analyte at 20 ug/L Average recovery and standard deviation for four analyses must be within Acceptance criteria given 1n Table 6 Method 8240. If not within limits, study must be redone only wifh those analytes that fall. For the single QC check analysis (MS results verification), the recovery of the compound of Interest must be within the limits given 1n Table 6. Store at -10 to -20°C, replace after 2 months, for gases and reactive compounds, and after 6 months for all other compounds 7- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, 9/86 Revision 2, December 1991 Variable REPORTING Deliverable* Sample Information Results Data Sheets Back-up Documentation Records QAPjP Default Condition Not specified for laboratory - Instructions for C-O-C for field operations given which Include sample collection date and time and date of sample receipt; however, lab responsibility for this Information not explicitly given. Uncorrected results reported with appropriate significant figures. For soils, the X moisture should be given even 1f results are on a wet weight basis Chapter One Indicates that full CLP (2/88) data sheets, or adaptations of these forms, for sample results and QC documentation comprise the full analytical package. This package should be obtained from the data generator upon request (I.e., not an automatic deliverable). Records must be maintained which document the quality of the data generated. Not required. 8- Method 8240, SW-846 3rd Edition, Method Rev.O, Revision 2, December 1991 Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Variable INITIATION Sample Container Preservative Holding Time Holding Time Start Sample Storage Sample Disposal Chaln-of-Custody Default Condition Concentrated Waste Samples and Soil/ Sediments and Sludges: 8 oz. wldemouth glass with Teflon liner. Liquid Samples: 1 gal. or 2.5 gal. amber glass with Teflon Uner. Concentrated wastes: none. Soil/Sediments and Sludges and Liquid Samples with No Residual Chlorine: Cool to 4*C Liquid Samples with Residual Chlorine: Add 3 mL 10% sodium thiosulfate/gal Ion and cool to 4'C. Concentrated Wastes and Soil/Sediment Samples: Samples must be extracted within 14 days and extracts analyzed within 40 days following extraction. Liquid Samples: Samples must be extracted within 7 days and extracts analyzed within 40 days following extraction. Sample collection. 4°C Not specified Not specified explicitly; however, field operations responsible for correct Chaln- of-Custody forms being sent to lab. PREPARATION Sample Pre-treatment Extraction Technique None for waters, Soils Decanted and foreign objects removed, pH may be needed and %mo1sture determination required. Dry Waste samples that may be extracted by Soxhlets or Son1cat1on are ground or subdivided so that the waste passes through a 1 mm sieve or can be extruded through a 1 mm hole. Waters = SepFunnel or CLLE; Soils = Soxhlets or Son1cat1on; Wastes = Waste Dilution, Son1cat1on or Soxhlets. 1- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Solvent pH Conditions Sample Size Final Volume Concentration Technique Cleanup Requirements Screening Requirements Waters (SepFunnel or CLLE) = MeClZ; Soxhlets = Toluene/Methanol (10:1 v/v) or Acetone/Hexane (1:1 v/v) for aqueous sludges and Soils/sediments; all other matrices by use MeC12; Sonication = Low-level samples use MeC12/ Acetone (1:1 v/v); High-level samples use MeC12. Waste Dilution = MeClZ. Waters = pH >11 followed by pH <2; Soils and wastes as received. Waters = l.OL; Soils by Soxhlets = lOg; Low-Level Soils by Sonication = 30g; High- level Soils by Sonication = 2g; Wastes by Waste Dilution = Ig. 1.0 mL for all samples except for Waste Dilution samples which are 5.0 mL. KD and/or N2 blowdown (solvent exchange required for various cleanup procedures) Optional. Optional. It's recommended that samples be screened by GC/FID or GC/PID prior to GC/MS analysis. ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Instrumentation Mass Range Scan Time GC Conditions Column Type Operating Conditions Injection Technique Injection Volume GC/MS/DS 35 to 500 amu not to exceed 1 sec/scan 30m X 0.25mm ID or 0.32mm ID fused-siUca column with lu film thickness (DB-5 or equlv.) RECOMMENDED: Temp. Prog. = 40°C (4m1n) to 270°C at !0°C/m1n; hold at 270°C until Benzo(g,hf1)pery1ene elutes GC Injector and Transfer Line = 250-300°C Carrier Gas = He at 30 mL/m1n or H2 at 50 mL/m1n Grob-type, splitless Injection 1-2 uL 2- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Tuning Component(s) Acquisition Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Initial Calibration Component List Number of Points Concentration Requirements Acceptance Criteria Frequency Standard Integrity Continuing Calibration Frequency DFTPP at 50 ng. It Is suggested that the tuning standard SHOULD also contain 50 ng/uL each of 4,4'-DDT, Benzldlne, and Pentachlorophenol to verify column performance. Mass Spec acquired straight forwardly - background subtraction must be done only to eliminate column bleed or Instrument background Ions. Table 3 (8270-9) (old criteria). Every 12 hours Store at £ 4°C, replace after 1 year or sooner, If a problem. Not specified. Some or all of the compounds listed In Table 1 may be Included. 5-Level One level should be near, but above, the MDL. All others should define the working range. XRSD across 5-levels for CCC compounds MUST be < 30X (all other compounds SHOULD be < 30%); SPCC compounds must have average RF > 0.05; and RRT across all standards for a particular compound should agree within + 0.06 RRT units. CCCs = Acenaphthene, l,4-D1chlorobenzene, Hexachlorobutadlene, N-N1troso-d1-n- phenylanrfne, D1-n-octylphthalate, Fluor- anthene, Benzo(a)pyrene, 4-Chloro-3- methylphenol, 2,4-D1chlorophenol, 2-N1tro- phenol, Phenol, Pentachlorophenol, and 2,4,6-Trfchlorophenol. SPCCs = N-N1troso-d1-n-propylam1ne, Hexa- chlorocyclopentadlene, 2,4-D1n1trophenol, and 4-N1trophenol. At beginning of contract and 1f CC std falls. Store at -10 to -20°C, replace after 1 year or sooner, 1f there's a problem. Every 12 Hours 3- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Concentration Acceptance Criteria Standard Integrity Analytical Run Sequence What constitutes sequence What 1s acceptable run Linearity? Quant1tat1on Technique Dally vs. Average RFs What 1s an acceptable ID Mid-level concentration %D relative to ICAL for CCCs MUST be < 30% (all other compounds SHOULD be < 305!); RF of SPCCs MUST be > 0.05; RT for ISs must not be > + 30 sec from those 1n last CC standard; and EICP area of an IS must not change by more than -50% to +100% from last CC standard. Store at 4°C, prepare fresh weekly. 12 hour sequence from Tune based on Injection. 1) Quantltatlon Ions for analytes of Interest are within calibration range; 2) Surrogates for aqueous and soil matrices are within limits given 1n Table 8 for extracts without dilution. For other matrices, recoveries within lab generated limits; 3) Standard criteria met and sample analyzed within 12 hour tune time. Dilute and reanalyze 1f compound outside of calibration range. Spike additional IS Into the diluted sample to maintain the IS spike level at 40 ng/uL. Internal Standard. Recommend: 1,4-Dichloro- benzene-D4, Naphthalene-08, Acenaphthene- 010, Phenanthrene-DIO, Chrysene-012, and Perylene-D12 at 4000 ng/uL. Spike 10 uL Into each 1 ml sample results In 40 ng/uL In each IS. Average RFs from ICAL (oversight 1n method- EPA believes should be dally RFs but method ambiguous). Compare sample Mass Spec with'that of a standard obtained from the dally CC standard - two criteria must be satisfied for qualitative ID: sample RRT must be within +0.06 RRT units of the standard RRT and all~1ons in the standard with relative Intensities >10% must be 1n the sample and these Intensities must agree to + 20% For Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) the following criteria apply: major Ions (>10%) 1n library spectrum should be 1n sample spectrum and agree to + 20X 1n terms 4- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition of relative Intensities; molecular Ions 1n the library spectrum should be 1n the sample spectrum; and Ions 1n the sample and not In the library (and vice versa) should be reviewed and their Importance evaluated. QUALITY CONTROL Blanks Type(s) Required Frequency Criteria Composition MB For each analytical batch (up to a maximum of 20 samples) Surrogates within limits given 1n Table 8 for waters and soils and within lab generated limits for all other matrices. No discussion given about allowable levels of Interferences; however, the blank must be evaluated for Interferences and corrective action taken to eliminate problems found. Waters = l.OL Reagent Water spiked with surrogates. Soils = all reagents less sample matrix (I.e., sodium sulfate). Matrix Spikes Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spike If Regulatory Compliance monitoring 1s being performed, the matrix spike should contain each analyte of Interest at the regulatory level or 1-5 times higher than the back- ground concentration, whichever 1s higher. If not looking at Regulatory Compliance, recommend for waters and soils: BN * 1,2,4- Trlchlorobenzene, Acenaphthene, 2,4- Dlnltrotoluene, Pyrene, N-N1troso-d1-n- propy1 amine, and 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene at 100 ug/mL each in MeOH; Add « Pentachloro- phenol, Phenol, 2-Chlorophenol, 4-Chloro-3- methy1 phenol, and 4-N1trophenol at 200 ug/mL each 1n MeOH. For wastes, apparently, either a larger volume of the water/soil MS spike may be used or a spiking solution containing each MS compound at a 5 times higher concentration may be prepared and used. Waters and soils by Soxhlets and LOW-1 eve! sonlcatlon =1.0 mL; soils by HIGH-level sonlcation * 2.0 mL; Wastes (by Waste Dilution) = 2.0 mL. If GPC to be done, add twice as much volume of the MS. 5- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Frequency Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity Surrogates Frequency Components/Cone. 1n Spike Level of Spiking Default Condition MS/MSD required per analytical batch. Compare recovery results with those given in Table 6 of the method. If performing compliance monitoring, and one or more of the analytes are not within acceptance criteria, a new single QC check sample, containing only those analytes that failed, must be analyzed and those results compared to Table 6. If analyte is still out, lab is out-of-control and corrective action must take place (the result for that analyte in the unspiked sample must be flagged as being suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes). If QC check good, may infer matrix effect presumably. If not performing compliance monitoring, if the LCS or QC check result for that analyte is also not within limits, the lab is out- of-control and corrective action must occur. If the LCS or QC check result for that analyte is within limits, a matrix effect may be Inferred. (NOTE: LCS NOT REQUIRED FOR PERFORMANCE OF THIS MODIFICATION OF THE METHOD). Matrlx-by-matrix recovery limits must be generated by lab on a regular basis (every 5-10 samples of same matrix). Store at 4°C, replace 1n 6 months or sooner, if there's a problem. In all samples, MS/MSOs, and MBs Recommend: BN = Nitrobenzene-05, Terphenyl- 014, and 2-Fluorobiphenyl at lOOug/mL; Acid = Phenol-06, 2,4,6-Trlbromophenol, and 2- Fluorophenol at 200 ug/mL. For wastes, apparently, either a larger volume of the water/soil surrogate spike may be used or a spiking solution containing each surrogate compound at a 5 times higher concentration may be prepared and used. Waters and soils by Soxhlets and LOW-1evel sonication = 1.0 mL; soils by HIGH-1evel sonication = 2.0 mL; Wastes (by Waste Dilution) * 2.0 mL. If GPC to be done, add twice as much volume of the MS. 6- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Criteria for Acceptability GPC Calibration Frequency Component/Cone Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity All must be within QC limits. For soils and waters, limits given In Table 8 may be used, for other matrices, limits developed by lab should be used. All QC limits should be updated annually. If a surrogate Is outside of QC limits: check calculations, standards, Instrument performance, etc., correct problems uncovered and reanalyze sample. If no problem 1s found, either reextract and reanalyze sample or flag data as "estimated concentration". From Method 3640. NOTE: GPC NOT REQUIRED Calibrate at least once/week. Corn 011 (200 mg/mL); and B1s(2-ethylhexyl)- phthalate (4.0 mg/mL) and Pentachlorophenol (4.0 mg/mL). If a UV detector 1s to be used, mix these two solutions together. Choose a dump time which allows ^ 85% of the corn oil removal and ^ 85% recovery of the phthalate. Choose the collect time to extend > 10 m1n after the elutlon of the pentachtorophenol. Not specified. Requirements to verify Method Performance MDL Studies Matrix-specific MDLs required for all analytes being reported - Chapter One Indicates a minimum of 3 analyses on a matrix spike containing the analytes of Interest at 3-5 times the estimated MDL Is required. MDL = (one-sided Student's t value at 99X confidence interval for n-1 degrees of freedom)(standard deviation of the replicate measurements). This definition adopted from SW-846 Update I as recommended by MICE. Acceptability criteria Frequency Through analysis of QC Check samples to determine accuracy and precision. Each analyst must make an initial one-time demonstration of their ability to generate data with acceptable accuracy and precision. If the method 1s changed (e.g., a new GC column type used), the quadrup- licate QC check sample analysis must be repeated. If MS recoveries are not within limits, a single QC Check sample, 7- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Components/Cone. In Spike Level of Spiking Concentration of Spike Criteria for Acceptability Standard Integrity Default Condition containing only those MS compounds that were out, must be analyzed to verify whether or not the analytical system was in control (for compliance monitoring only - LCS may be used Instead of QC check otherwise). QC concentrate = each analyte of Interest at a concentration of 100 ug/mL In Acetone. Should be prepared from an Independent source from which the calibration standards are made. 1.0 ml Into four 1-L allquots of reagent water. The QC check samples are then extracted and analyzed the same as waters. 100 ug/L Average recovery and standard deviation for four analyses must be within Acceptance criteria given 1n Table 6 Method 8270. If not within limits, study must be redone only with those analytes that fall. For the single QC check analysis (MS results verification), the recovery of the compound of Interest must be within the limits given 1n Table 6. Store at 4°C, replace In 6 months or sooner, 1f there's a problem. REPORTING Dellverables Sample Information Results Data Sheets Not specified for laboratory - Instructions for C-O-C for field operations given which Include sample collection date and time and date of sample receipt; however, lab responsibility for this Information not explicitly given. Unconnected results reported with appropriate significant figures. For soils, the % moisture should be given even If results are on a wet weight basis Chapter One Indicates that full CLP (2/88) data sheets, or adaptations of these forms, for sample results and QC documentation comprise the full analytical package. This package should be obtained from the data generator upon request (I.e., not an automatic deliverable). 8- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 Variable Default Condition Back-up Documentation Records Records must be maintained which document the quality of the data generated. QAPjP Not required. .. - 9- Method 8270 SW-846, Rev. 0, 9/86 Revision 1, December 1991 APPENDIX III Laboratory Results April 13 through 19, 1993 Sampling Event / Enseco East Enseco Incorporated 2200 Cottontail Line Somerset. \J 08875-6/45 F.i \: 90S '469-751 <•> A Corning Company Summary Package For Cooper Environmental Enseco-East Project No. 28187 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 2B187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB2-4.5 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-01-SA Lab File ID: C4785_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 —— — - 75-00-3 — — — 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 —— —— 75-34-3 —— —— 540-59-0 —— — 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ------ 56-23-5 —— —— 75-27-4- ———— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 -—— — 124-48-1 — —— 79-00-5 —— —— 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ----- 591-78-6 —— — 127-18-4 — —— 79-34-5 ————— T no QD_T_ _ _ 100-41-4 — —— 100-42-5; — —— 1330-20-7 —— - • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride f\^f^ l.Uilt= —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromofonn —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethehe —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene «^wjr ,L. tlilt£ —— Xylene (total) 61 61 61 61 11 500 61 61 61 61 61 61 39 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 17 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 290 61 7 U U U UJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U UJ U U U U u • U u m u [ uJ 1001 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol : ' 1.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP Contract: SAS No.: HB2-45 SDG No.: ID: 0.530 (nun) Lab Sample ID: 28187-01-SA Lab File ID: C4785______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: Number TICs found: 10 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. • 10. COMPOUND NAME HYDROCARBON C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C10H12 ISOMER C-4 BENZENE C10H12 ISOMER ' C10H12 ISOMER UNKNOWN RT 11.29 25.92 26.21 26.78 27.57 28.18 28.88 30.40 31.02 32.18 EST. CONC. 440 590 670 250 790 280 410 230 360 230 Q J J J J J J J J J J 0002 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 •—— Enseco Volatile Organics *<""T"n<:°'mp' Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB2-4.5 Lab ID: 028187-0001-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO ug/kg 30 u tert-Butyl Methyl ether 880 ug/kg 61 n-Propylbenzene 480 ug/kg 30 Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. f » Percent Moisture is 18%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1 T 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST 1 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 25 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB3-3.0 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-02-SA Lab File ID: C4815_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 -—— — 74-83-9 -—— — 75-01-4 —— — - 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 ——— —— 67-64-1 —— —— 75-15-0 ------ 75-35-4 -—— — 75-34-3 —— —— 540-59-0 —— — 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ——— :- 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 —— —— 75-27-4 ————— "7 O O "7 ^ 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 -—— — 124-48-1 — —— 79-00-5 --——- 71-43-2 ----- - 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ------ 108-10-1 —— — 591-78-6 —— — 127-18-4 ———— 79-34T5 —————— i nn_ QQ— i _ _ T f\ o Q n — "7 100-41-4 ————— 100-42-5 —— ~ 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chlorome thane - —— Bromomethane - —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1 , 1-Dichlorbethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3 -Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methy 1 -2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachl oroethene —— 1,1,2,2 -Tetradi loroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1000 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 . 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0004 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED Contract: SAS No.: HB3-3.0 SDG No.: % Moisture: not dec. 25 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: _9 Lab Sample ID: 28187-02-SA Lab File ID: C4815______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: lQO_(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C10H8 ISOMER RT 23.13 23.60 25.21 25.92 26.22 27.18 27.56 28.88 33.46 EST. CONC. 830 2300 1300 1000 1800 830 1300 1000 1300 Q J J J J J J J J J 0005 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 ——————————————————————————————————- Enseco Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-3.0 Lab ID: 028187-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 27 APR 93 Analyzed: 27 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO ug/kg 830 d tert-Butyl Methyl ether 410 ug/kg 1700 J n-Propylbenzene 210 ug/kg 830 J Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. Percent Moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an •estimated concentration. ND - Not detected 0006 NA « Not applicable Reported By: Joey J. Buaron Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A i VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/nL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB4-2.5 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-03-SA Lab File ID: C4787_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane______________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone____________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————l,l-Di chloroethane_______ 54QJ-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________' 107-06-2——————1,2 -Dichloroethane 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4 ——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 61 61 61 61 10 270 61 61 61 61 61 61 35 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 D Uu UJ B Uuuuuu BJ Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .(UL) 0007 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: ' 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. HB4-2.5 SDG No.: % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: 10 Lab Sample ID: 28187-03-SA Lab File ID: C4787_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. -10. COMPOUND NAME HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C10H12 ISOMER C-4 BENZENE C10H12 ISOMER RT 11.29 20.01 21.68 24.24 25.92 26.22 27.57 28.18 28.87 31.01 EST. CONC. 190 200 120 120 420 350 570 140 290 180 Q J J J J J J J J J J 00GB FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 ———~~~—————————————————————————————— Enseco Volatile Organics AL—c0>mr'n Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB4-2.5 Lab ID: 028187-0003-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/kg 31 u tert-Butyl Methyl ether 250 ug/kg 1500 DJ n-Propylbenzene 9.1 ug/kg 31 J Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and "limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note D : Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution. Note J : Result is detected below the'reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEA5T Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED Contract: SAS No.: HB4-2.5DL SDG No. : % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Lab Sample ID: 28187-03DL-SA Lab File ID: C4816_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 fuL) Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 —— —— 74-83-9 —— —— 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 —— —— / D u y ^ 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 —— —— 540-59-0 ----- 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 ——— '- 71-55-6 —— —— 56-23-5 —— —— 75-27-4 ————— "TO Q "7 K 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 —— —— 124-48-1 —— — 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —— —— 108-10-1 ————— <^O1 — "7Q d — — 127-18-4 —— — 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 —— — 100-42-5 ----- 1330-20-7 —— - • —— Chloromethane • —— Broraomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1,2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloroaethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromof orm —— 4 -Methy 1 -2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethe'ne —— 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1900 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 U U U U U BD U U U U U U D U U U U U U U Uuuuuuuuuuuuu 0010 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: _5 Contract: SAS No.: HB4-25DL SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-03DL-SA Lab File ID: C4816_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uLl CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE RT 23.59 25.93 26.22 27.55 28.87 EST. CONC. 910 910 1200 1400 760 Q J J J J J 0011 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/raL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED Contract: SAS No.: HB5-Z3 SDG No.: % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-SA Lab File ID: C4800_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/26/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: _LOO__(uL) Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/K 74-87-3 —— —— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— i r»a i n — T — — — 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 1 no on -_"?_.. _ 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— • —— Chloroinethane • —— Bromome thane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1, 1,2, 2-Tetrach'loroethane —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 800 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1000 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 190 1500 1500 U U U U U BJ U U U U U U J U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J 0 U U 012 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: _4 Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-SA Lab File ID: C4800______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/26/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: __p_p__(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C11H10 ISOMER RT 23.57 26.22 27.56 29.49 EST. CONC. 910 1100 1100 1100 Q J J J J 0013 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 ——————————————————————————————————— Enseco 1 Volatile Organics *«..«.«.<^..^PJ Target Compound List (TCL) ^ Method 8240 1 Client Name: Cooper Environmental .1 Client ID: HB5-2.3 Lab ID: 028187-0004-SA , Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 26 APR 93 Analyzed: 26 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting i Parameter Result Units Limit :J 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/kg 770 d tert-Butyl Methyl ether 490 ug/kg 1500 J n-Propylbenzene 380 ug/kg 77Q 0 :J ..J Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. ,j Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J .-.Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an : estimated concentration. ND - Not detected n n , , NA - Not applicable UUJ 4 Reported By: Joey J. Buaron Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST__________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB6-1.5 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-05-SA Lab File ID: C4778______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3 ————— - 74-83-9 ———— - 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 78-87-5 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— ^Ql — "7 D — £— — 127-18-4 ————— 79-34-5 —————— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ————— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane - —— Bromomethane - —— Vinvl Chloride • —— Chloroe thane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone - —— Carbon Bisulfide • —— 1, l-Dichloroethene • —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane • —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ • —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichlorome thane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Tr i chl or oethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetra chl or oethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 3 75 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U J B D U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0015 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: _1 Contract: SAS No.: HB6-15 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-05-SA Lab File ID: C4778______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 26.27 EST. CONC. 14 Q J 0016 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 Enseco Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB6-1.5 Lab ID: 028187-0005-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/kg 5.8 tert-Butyl Methyl ether ND ug/kg 12 n-Propyl benzene ND ug/kg 5.8 : <~"" r' >n Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected 00 NA - Not applicable Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Contract: SAS No.: HB7-X25 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06-SA Lab File ID: C4779_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ------ 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 ——— — 75-09-2 —— —— 67-64-1 —— —— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ™—— 540-59-0 —— — 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 — -—— 56-23-5 —— —— 75-27-4 —— — - 10061-01-5 — - 79-01-6 ------ 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 — —— - 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —— —— 108-10-1 ----- 127-18-4 --—— 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 ——— - 100-42-5 —— — 1330-20-7 ——— • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroe thane • —— Methvlene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— I, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1 , 3 -Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methyl -2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 , 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 4 240 1 12 12 12 12 12 37 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Uu UuJ BE J U U U U U B U U U U U U U U J U Uuuuuuuuuu 3018 FORM I VOA 3/90 L IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/fflL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) ______ (UL) Contract: SAS No.: HB7-125 SDG No..: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06-SA Lab File ID: C4779_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: Number TICs found: Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. 556672 2. COMPOUND NAME CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETH UNKNOWN RT 20.13 26.24 EST. CONC. 35 27 Q JN J 0013 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 iij .j .j —————————————————" —————————— Enseco Volatile Organics *«.-«*o-, Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB7-1.25 Lab ID: 028187-0006-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/kg 5.9 tert-Butyl Methyl ether 29 ug/kg 12 n-Propylbenzene ND ug/kg 5.9 Percent .Moisture is 15%. All results'and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable 0020 Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1 1 r 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST i Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 2.5 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB7-X25DL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06DL-SA Lab File ID: C4864_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— RQ 1 _ "70 £___ _ 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— inQ_QQ_^ _ 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromome thane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone • —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ — -Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methyl-2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 , 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane —— Toluene ' —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 24 24 24 24 8 370 24 24 24 24 24 24 58 4 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 U U U U BDJ BD U U U U U U BD BDJ U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U 3021 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 2.5 (g/raL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: "3 Contract: SAS No.: HB7-125DL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06DL-SA Lab File ID: C4864_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. 556672 2. 3. 124196 COMPOUND NAME CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETH UNKNOWN NONANAL (8CI9CI) RT 20.16 26.27 27.95 EST. CONC. 52 40 21 Q JN BJ JN 0022 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEA5T Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: SAS NO.: HB8-2 SDG No.: % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: 28187-07-SA Lab File ID: C4780 _____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____ 1. 0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3-———————Chloromethane_____________ 74-83 -9 ———————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3——r————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93- 3———————2 -Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5————————1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2————————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4 ——————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88'-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene________________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_____________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 12 12 12 12 2 3 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U J BJ U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U (uL) 0023 FORM I VOA 3/90 J IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB8-2 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-07-SA Lab File ID: C4780_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Number TICs found: Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 0024 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1 ] Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter ^ Enseco Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Cooper Environmental HB8-2 028187-0007-SA SOIL 20 APR 93 Sampled: 18 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) tert-Butyl Methyl ether n-Propylbenzene ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg 5.9 12 5.9 1 1 Percent Moisture is 15%. All resultsrand limits are reported on a dry weight basis. 0025 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST >-.—-- J J j Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/nL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB10-S SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-08-SA Lab File ID: C4781______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: J j J J J J J ^^J j CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3 —— —— 74-83-9 — —— - 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 — —— - 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 —— —— 75-35-4 —— — - 75-34-3 ——— — 540-59-0 — —— 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 — —— /o y J J — 71-55-6 —— —— 56-23-5 — ——— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 —— —— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— / O £O £ 108-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 —— — 79-34-5 ————— 100-41-4 ----- 100-42-5 —— — 1330-20-7 —— - • —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride f-WC 1»UJ1C —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, l-Dichloroethene —— 1 , l-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1. 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , l-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Br omod i chl or omethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1,1, 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 rTetrachloroethane —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 3 7 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U J BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U X o U 02 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: __1 Contract: SAS No.: HB10-S SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-08-SA Lab File ID: C4781_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 26.24 EST. CONC. 11 Q J 0027 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 i .] 1 3 •——^————————————————————————— " Enseco Volatile Organics AI.W^C.™^ Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB10-S Lab ID: 028187-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 25 APR 93 Analyzed: 25 APR 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/kg 6.0 tert-Butyl Methyl ether ND ug/kg 12 n-Propylbenzene ND ug/kg 6.0 Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable 0028 Reported By: Bhaskar Patel Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB10-SRE SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-08RE-SA Lab File ID: C4860______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 ] 1 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 —————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— / O 17 J J — —t i c c f- 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— / O O / D 10061-01-5 —— 124-48-1 ————— 71-43-2 —————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —————— 108-10-1 ————— 127-18-4 ————— 79-34-5 —————— T n Q Q O "3 _ . i no _ onl."7— ._ 100-41-4 ————— 100-42-5 ————— 1330-20-7 ———— • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroe thane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone • —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1,2 -Dichloropropane —— cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane —— Toluene ' —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene «-/ ^•J' A. wliC —— Xylene (total) 12 12 12 12 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 3 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0029 FORM I VOA 3/90 1 r IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: CAP______.-ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: __2 Contract: SAS No.: HB10-SRE SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-08RE-SA Lab File ID: C4860_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER 1. 2. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 26.26 32.70 EST. CONC. 40 8 Q BJ J 0030 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. J Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 96 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L OIL -J CAS NO. COMPOUND SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-09-SA Lab File ID: C4835 Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— f~7 C fi ' ? _ _ « _ 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 —————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 —————— 71-43-2 —————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —————— 108-10-1 ————— 591-78-6 ————— 127-18-4 ————— 79-34-5 —————— 100-41-4 ————— 100-42-5 ————— 1330-20-7 ——— • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromomethane • —— vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride X1.^W 1»U11C —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— 2 -Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1, 1,2,2-TetrachJ.oroethane —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 450000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 340000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 1200OO 79000 120000 2300000 120000 2600000 U U U U U B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U 0031 FORM I VOA 3/90 j J J IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 96 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) . (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L OIL SDG No.: Soil Extract Volume: 10000 Number TICs found: 10 Lab Sample ID: 28187-09-SA Lab File ID: C4835______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/K< CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. .10. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C10H12 ISOMER RT 22.14 23.11 23.60 25.20 25.93 26.22 27.18 27.57 28.87 31.04 EST. CONC. 2100000 1400000 2400000 1200000 1600000 2000000 1200000 1600000 1200000 1100000 Q J J J J J J J J J J 0032 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 J Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter HB3-L OIL LAYER 028187-0009-SA WASTE 20 APR 93 Sampled: 17 APR 93 Prepared: 27 APR 93 ". Enseco Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: 28 APR 93 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) tert-Butyl Methyl ether n-Propylbenzene Result ND ND 89000 Wet Weight Reporting Units Limit 2500 5000 5000 ug/kg ug/kg Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note D :•Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Joey J. Buaron 0033 Approved By: Nell Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST . Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 96 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L OILDL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-09DL-SA Lab File ID: C4817_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 J CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: 50.0(uL) Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ----- 75-09-2 —— —— 67-64-1 —— —— 75-15-0 — — — 75-35-4 —— —— 75-34-3 —— —— 540-59-0 -——— 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 ———— 7^ C" CT /•" 1-55 6 — — - 56-23-5 —— —— 75-27-4 -— —— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 —— —— 124-48-1 —— — 79-00-5 — — — 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —— —— 108-10-1 ———— R O T — "7 Q £_ — .__ 127-18-4 —— — 79-34-5 ————— 1 HO QCt_'3_ — 1 ft Q on "7 _ 100-41-4 — —— 100-42-5 — —— 1330-20-7 -—— • —— Chloromethane • —— Bromone thane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone • —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, l-Dichloroethene —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachl oroethene —— 1, 1, 2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 480000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 250000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 290000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 240000 1700000 240000 2000000 U U U U U BD U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U D U ( D C034 FORM I VOA 3/90 J iiu IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 96 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: 10 Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L OILDL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-09DL-SA Lab File ID: C4817______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _J50_._0(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/ CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. • 10. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C-4 BENZENE C11H10 ISOMER RT 22.13 23.11 23.60 25.19 25.93 26.21 27.17 27.55 28.88 39.48 EST. CONC. 3000000 2000000 4200000 1700000 1800000 3000000 1600000 2400000 1600000 1600000 Q J J J J J J J J J J j v» li 8035 J J FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP_____ ID: 0.530 (nun) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: TREATED TAP SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-10-SA Lab File ID: C4827_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. J J J J J J COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/ 74-87-3-——————Chloroiaethane___________ 74-83-9————————Broraomethane__________________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride____________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——.———1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4————————Bromodichloromethane_____ 7 8-87-5———————1,2 -Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloroaethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2————————Bromoform________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-.S———————l,l,2,2-Tetrach'loroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene____________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 FORM I VOA U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) 0036 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 2B187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/raL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: __1 Contract: SAS No.: TREATED TAP SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-10-SA Lab File ID: C4827______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 26.26 EST. CONC. 6 Q BJ FORM I VOA-TIC 0037 3/90 j Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Cooper Environmental TREATED TAP 028187-0010-SA AQUEOUS 20 APR 93 Sampled: 18 APR 93 Prepared: 27 APR 93 Enseco 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) tert-Butyl Methyl ether n-Propylbenzene Result Units NO ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: 27 APR 93 Reporting Limit 5.0 10 5.0 J J j J ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Joey J. Buaron 0038 Approved By: Neil Costanza 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. T Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER, Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L WATER SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-11-SA Lab File ID: C4834_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ___50.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. J I T COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 —————— -Chlorome thane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3 ———————— 1, 1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3————'•----2-Butanone__________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5 ———————— 1, 2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6—————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform__________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2, 2-TetrachIoroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene_____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene______________ 100-42-5———————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 500 500 500 500 500 250 500 500 500 500 500 500 74 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 360 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 150 500 230 U U U D U BJ U U U U U U J U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U UJ U J .(uL) 0039 FORM I VOA 3/90 Ilij IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: __3 Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L WATER SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-ll-SA Lab File ID: C4834_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: 50.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. COMPOUND NAME C-3 BENZENE C-3 BENZENE UNKNOWN RT 22.13 23.59 26.23 EST. CONC. 300 500 450 Q J J J j J J J J FORM I VOA-TIC 0040" 3/90 J J J J ——————————————————————————————————— Enseco Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L WATER LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0011-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 28 APR 93 Analyzed: 28 APR 93 Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/L 250 u tert-Butyl Methyl ether 6200 ug/L 500 n-Propylbenzene 86 ug/L 250 J Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note J :.Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected n n A 1 NA - Not applicable UUll Reported By: Joey J. Buaron Approved By: Neil Costanza IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) Q__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __20. decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2. 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB2-4 5 SDG No.: J J J j J Lab Sample ID: 28187-01-SA Lab File ID: B9738_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG j.uo yy * 111-44-4 ——— Q K. CT O 541-73-1 ——— 106-46-7 ——— 95-50-1 ———— y O *t O / — —— — 108-60-1 ——— 106-44-5 ——— C •> 1 C * "* 67-72-1 ———— "7 D CO 1 O O *7 K F 105-67-9 ———— 111-91-1 ——— 120-82-1 ——— 91-20-3 ———— 106-47-8 ——— a i f.o •)_____ 59-50-7 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— Q Q _rtir O 95-95-4 ———— 91-58-7 ———— O Q *T A A 131-11-3 ——— ooa_o<; o__ 606-20-2 ——— Q ft rtO ^ Q -5 -J •> Q ——— Phenol ——— bis 1 2 -Chloroethyl ) ether ——— 2-Chlorophenol ——— 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1 , 2 -Dichlorobenzene ——— 2-Methylphenol ——— 2 , 2 ' -oxybis (l-Chloropropane)_ ——— 4 -Methylphenol ——— N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine __ ——— Hexachl or oe thane ——— N i t r obenz ene ——— Isophorone ——— 2-Nitrophenol ——— 2 , 4-Dimethylphenol ——— bis (2 -Chloroethoxy) methane ——— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol ——— 1,2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene ——— Naphthalene ——— 4 -Chloroanil ine —— — Hexachlorobutadiene ——— 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ——— 2-Methylnaphthalene ——— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ ——— 2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol ——— 2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene ——— 2-Nitroaniline ——— Dimethylphthalate AwciiaiJiii»ijy xtfiic ——— 2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene ——— 3-Nitroaniline ——— Acenaphthene 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 110 410 410 410 140 410 410 990 410 990 410 410 410 990 410 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J D U D J U U U U U U U U U U 0042 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __2J> decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) X_ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB2-4 5 SDG No.: J Lab Sample ID: 28187-01-SA Lab File ID: B9738_______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____J..O CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate______________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene________________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline__________ 534-52-1——————4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)~ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene____________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol________ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene__________________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_________________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole______________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate__________ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine____ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene_________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_____________________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_______~_ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) f luorarithene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k) f luoranthene________ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene_______________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene_____ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h,i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 990 990 410 410 410 410 75 990 990 410 410 410 990 85 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 82 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 U U U U U U J U U U U U U J U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U J 3/90 ...J ,-J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __2.0 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ . pH: 8.2 Number TICs found: 17 Contract: SAS No.: HB2-4 5 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-01-SA Lab File ID: B9738______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 90120 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE C-4 BENZENE ISOMER UNKNOWN C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-5 BENZENE ISOMER NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL- UNKNOWN UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.51 8.23 10.16 10.36 11.67 12.33 13.29 15.57 21.85 23.84 24.49 24.65 25.18 25.49 25.97 26.87 27.22 EST. CONC. 8200 310 120 170 120 83 83 83 120 120 170 290 170 120 330 330 210 Q ABJ BJ J J J J J JN J J J J J J J J J 0044 FORK I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __24. decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB3-3 0 SDG No.: J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-02-SA Lab File ID: B9739_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG i f\ o n ^ *> 111-44-4 ——— 541-73-1 ——— 106-46-7 ——— 95-50-1 ———— 95-48-7 ———— 108-60-1 ——— 106-44-5 ——— 621-64-7 ——— 67-72-1 ———— 98-95-3 ———— 78-59-1 ———— O O "T K K 105-67-9 ——— - 111-91-1 ——— 120-82-1 ——— 91-20-3 ———— 106-47-8 ——— 59-50-7 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— 95 — Q«5— 4— .— — ••* •** ^ ^ -* 88-74-4 ———— 131-11-3 ——— o r\ o o £ o 606-20-2 ——— 99-09-2 ———— fl 1 —t^ 1 O ——— Phenol ——— bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ——— 2 -Chlorophenol ——— 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene ——— 2-Methvlphenol ——— 2 , 2 ' -oxybis ( 1-Chloropropane) _ ——— 4 -Methylphenol ——— N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ——— Hexachloroethane ——— Nitrobenzene ——— Isophorone ——— 2-Nitrophenol ——— 2 , 4-Dimethylphenol ——— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy) methane __ ——— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol ——— 1 , 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene ——— Naphthalene ——— 4-Chloroaniline ——— Hexachlorobutadiene ——— 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ——— 2-Methylnaphthalene ——— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ ——— 2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol ——— 2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene ——— 2-Nitroaniline ——— Dimethylphthalate ——— Acenaphthylene ——— 2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene ——— 3-Nitroaniline ——— Acenaphthene 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 47 430 430 1000 430 1000 430 430 430 1000 430 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U 0045 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __24. decanted: (Y/N) H_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) %__ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB3-3 0 SDG No.: 1 _ J J j .J _J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-02-SA Lab File ID: B9739______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2, 4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran____________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate_______ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenyletlier_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene______________~ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline____________ 534-52-1——————4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)~ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-pheny 1 ether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol________ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene_______________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_______________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole___________________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate_______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine_____ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene______________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____" 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) f luoranthene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) f luoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene__________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene_____ 53-70-3 ———————Dibenz (a, h) anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h, i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1000 1000 430 430 430 430 430 1000 1000 430 430 430 1000 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 49 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 U D U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U J U U U U U U U 004S 3/90 J J J H J" IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 30. 2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 24 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 8.2 Number TICs found: _5 Contract: SAS No.: HB3-3 0 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-02-SA Lab File ID: B9739______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____l._Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG GAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. 4. 5. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.55 8.25 26.84 28.84 29.90 EST. CONC. 10000 150 130 170 87 Q ABJ BJ J J J y j j j j 0047 J J FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: SAS No.: HB4-2 5 SDG No. J % Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . O(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 28187-03-SA Lab File ID: B9740_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2 '-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________' 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachl oroethane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________ 88-75-5————————2-Nitrophenol______________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene______________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline____________ 87-68-3 —————•—Hexachlor obutadiene_________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57 -6———————2 -Methy Inaphthalene________ 77-47-4———————Hexachl or ocy cl open tadiene_____ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2 -Chloronaphthalene___________ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline______________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene______________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene__________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline_____________ 83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene_______________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 130 410 410 1000 410 1000 410 410 410 1000 410 U U D D U U U U D D U U U U U D D D U D D U J U U U U U U U U U U 048 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No. : 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) 5 __ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __ 2J) decanted: (Y/N) H _ Contract: SAS No.: HB4-2 5 SDG No.: Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 Injection Volume: ____ 2,0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) % __ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND J J ^——-- J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-03-SA Lab File ID: B9740_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene________ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene_______________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3——————4 -Bromophenyl-pheny lether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene_________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol________ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene___________ 120-12-7 ——————Anthracene_____________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole______________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate______ 91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine_____ 56-55-3———————Benzo( a) anthracene________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene________________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) fluoranthene 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) pyrene___________________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene___ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h, i) perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1000 1000 410 410 410 410 93 1000 1000 410 410 410 1000 160 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 43 51 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 U U D U U U J U U U U U U J U U U U U U U UJJ U U U U U U U 0049 3/90 J J J J J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __20 decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2. 0 (uLl GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 8.2 Number TICs found: 21 Contract: SAS No.: HB4-2 5 SDG NO.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-03-SA Lab File ID: B9740_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 90120 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER HYDROCARBON C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER 2, 3 -DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE 2, 3 -DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 2,3-DIHYDRODIMETHYL 1H-INDEN NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL- UNKNOWN UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.54 8.24 10.16 10.35 10.55 11.32 11.67 11.74 12.15 12.34 12.56 14.24 14.35 15.57 16.28 19.08 21.88 21.96 24.48 24.64 26.85 EST. CONC. 9200 600 330 330 170 120 250 120 120 170 120 120 120 120 120 210 210 120 170 120 330 Q ABJ BJ J J J J J J J J J J J JN J J J J J J J 0050 J J FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __22 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2_-_0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-SA Lab File ID: F2707_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1,0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG I j 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________' 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylaaine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene______________ 78-59-1——————Isophorone_________.______ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol_____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2———————2,4-Dichlorophenol_________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3 ———————Naphthal ene______________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline___________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene____________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline^________________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-9 6-8 ——————Acenaphthylene____________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________ 83-3 2-9 ———————Acenaphthene_____________ 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 610 420 420 420 920 420 420 1000 420 1000 420 420 420 1000 420 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U 0051 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST :] Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __22. decanted: (Y/N) H_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuLl GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 GAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3 SDG No.: J J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-SA Lab File ID: F2707______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5—• 100-02-7— 132-64-9 — 121-14-2 — 84-66-2—- 7005-72-3- 86-73-7—- 100-01-6— 534-52-1— 86-30-6—- 101-55-3 — 118-74-1— 87-86-5—- 85-01-8 —— 120-12-7 — -2,4-Dinitrophenol_ -4-Nitrophenol___ -Dibenzofuran -2,4-Dinitrotoluene_ -Diethylphthalate_ -4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ -Fluorene -4-Nitroaniline •4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ •N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ •4 -Bromopheny 1-phenylether_ Hexachl or oben z ene_________ •Pentachlorophenol________ Phenanthrene___________ Anthracene_____________ •Carbazole -Butylbenzylphthalate_ 86-74-8——————• ________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene______ 129-00-0——————Pyrene 85-68-7————— 91-94-1———————3, 3 • -Dichlorobenzidine 56-55-3————— 218-01-9——— 117-81-7———— 117-84-0———— 205-99-2———— 207-08-9———— 50-32T-8————— -Benzo(a)anthracene_ -Chrysene_ bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate_ -Di-n-octylphthalate_____" -Benzo(b)fluoranthene_____ -Benzo(k)f luoranthene_ -Benzo(a)pyrene^ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene_ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene_ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h, i)perylene__ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1000 1000 420 420 420 420 170 1000 1000 420 420 420 1000 340 420 420 420 51 210 420 420 420 100 290 420 49 420 420 420 420 67 U U U U U U J U U U U U U J U U D J J U U U J J U J U U U UJ 0052 3/90 IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 22 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2. 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 Number TICs found: 21 Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-SA Lab File ID: F2707_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 123422 2. 103651 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 90120 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. COMPOUND NAME 2-PENTANONE, 4 -HYDROXY-4 -MET BENZENE, PROPYL- C-3 BENZENE ISOMER C-3 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER HYDROCARBON C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER 2 , 3-DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE 2, 3-DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE C-4 BENZENE ISOMER 2, 3 -DIHYDRODIMETHYL 1H-INDEN NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL- C-12 H-10 ISOMER DIMETHYL NAPHTHALENE ISOMER C-14 H-14 ISOMER HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN RT 6.93 9.63 9.88 11.25 11.84 12.04 12.48 12.97 13.38 13.46 13.90 14.09 14.13 16.13 17.41 18.63 19.36 22.33 23.71 26.35 30.72 EST. CONC. 2900 260 260 300 470 720 300 210 380 260 260 340 260 170 510 300 300 170 850 470 810 Q ABJN JN J J J J J J J J J J J J JN J J J J J J 0053 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST j J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __22 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7. CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3DL SDG No.: j J V J J J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-DL Lab File ID: F2709_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ___10.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3 -Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_________ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________\ 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroe thane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_____________ 78-59-1———•--—Isophorone_________._______ 88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2, 4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene _____________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline____________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene__________ 77-47-4 ———————Hexachlorocy clopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol_____ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline_,______________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene______________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene___________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline___________ 83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene_____________ 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 910 4200 4200 4200 1200 4200 4200 10000 4200 10000 4200 4200 4200 10000 4200 FORM I SV-1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U DJ U U U DJ U U U U U U U U D U 0054 3/90 J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __22. decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uLl Injection Volume: ____2 . 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 Number TICs found: _3 Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3DL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-DL Lab File ID: F2709_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: 10.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) Uff/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 123422 2. 3. COMPOUND NAME 2-PENTANONE, UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON 4 -HYDROXY-4 -MET RT 6.84 25.70 28.69 EST. CONC. 4700 850 1300 Q ABJN J J J J J J 0055 J J FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 ] IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. 3 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) 5__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) £_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (up Injection Volume: ____2 . 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 9.6 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB6-1 5 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-05-SA Lab File ID: B9742______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 1 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________________ 111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol____________' 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachl or oe thane______________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_________________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_____________________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4 -Dimethyl phenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) me thane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene___________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline______________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene_______ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4 ———————Hexachlorocy cl opentadi ene_____ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95^-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline____________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene____________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline_______________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_____________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 990 410 990 410 410 410 990 410 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 056 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1 T 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __20. decanted: (Y/N) N Contract: SAS No.: HB6-1 5 SDG No.: Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 9.6 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 28187-05-SA Lab File ID: B9742_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9 ——————Dibenzof uran______________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate__________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73 -7 ———————Fluorene _________________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline________________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)~ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene___________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene___________________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_______________ 86-74-8——————Carbazole____________________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene________________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene______________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate________ 91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene__________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene___________________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo(b) fluoranthene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k) fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) pyrene_________________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(1,2, 3-cd)pyrene____ 53-70-3——————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h, i)perylene_______ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 990 990 410 410 410 410 46 990 990 410 410 410 990 320 72 410 410 390 430 410 410 250 230 51 410 330 57 200 120 410 130 U U U U U U J U U U U U U J J U U J U U J J J U J J J J UJ 4)057 FORM I SV-2 3/90 IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __20 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 9.6 Number TICs found: 12 Contract: SAS No.: HB6-1 5 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-05-SA Lab File ID: B9742______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 100527 4. 5. 6. 7. . 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN RT 5.80 6.19 8.27 13.23 14.75 17.08 18.10 21.90 24.50 24.66 25.97 27.31 EST. CONC. 28000 83 400 170 83 120 83 290 83 83 83 330 Q ABJ J BJ J J J J J J J J J 0058 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volxime: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) X_ pH: 7.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB7-1 25 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06-SA Lab File ID: B9743_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________ 111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol__________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44 -5——————4 -Methylphenol___________\ 621-64-7——•-——N-Nitroso-di-n-prbpylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachl or oethane_________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_______________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Diaethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-8 2-1——————1,2,4 -Tr ichlorobenzene______ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene_________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_______________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene__________ 77-47-4———————Hexachl orocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-:4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline_______________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate__________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene______________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline___________ 83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene_____________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 990 410 990 410 410 410 990 410 U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0059 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST___________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB7-1 25 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06-SA Lab File ID: B9743_______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2, 4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol_____________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran____________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate__________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene_______________~ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline__________ 534-52-1——————4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6 ———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) _ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene_______________ 120-12-7 ——————Anthracene_________________ 86-74-8 ———————Carbazole_________________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-butylphthalate________ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene____________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 • -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene^_________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_______________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate______~ 205-99.-2——————Benzo (b) f luorarithene_______ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) f luoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) pyrene______________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene___ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h,i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 990 990 410 410 410 410 410 990 990 410 410 410 51 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 D U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U U U U D D U U U U U D U U 0060 FORM I SV-2 3/90 »—-^ J J IF SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: ^8187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: 20 decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 7.2 Number TICs found: Contract: SAS No.: HB7-1 25 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-06-SA Lab File ID: B9743_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ' . 8. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.54 8.23 18.07 19.75 21.88 27.27 33.63 39.22 EST. CONC. 9100 490 120 120 83 170 120 170 Q ABJ BJ J J J J J J J CONI- I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __14. decanted: (Y/N) N Contract: SAS No. : HB8-2 SDG No. : J J V J J J Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) X_ pH: 6.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 28187-07-SA Lab File ID: B9748_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG J J J J 1 A D QC. *5 111-44-4 ——— 541-73-1 ——— 106-46-7 ——— 95-50-1 ———— 95-48-7 ———— 108-60-1 ——— 106-44-5 ——— 621-64-7 —— - 67-72-1 ———— yo y o j *T Q ^ ft 1 105-67-9 ——— 111-91-1 ——— 120-83-2 ——— 120-82-1 ——— 91-2O-3 ———— 106-47-8 ——— 59-50-7 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— 95-95-4 ———— 88-74-4 ———— .L.J.L JLJ. J f r\ f f\ f\ ~* 99-09-2 ———— ——— Phenol ——— bis (2-Chloroe thy 1) ether ——— 2-Chlorophenol ——— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ——— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene ——— 2 -Methylphenol ——— 2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ ——— 4 -Methylphenol ——— N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine __ ——— Hexachl or oe thane ——— Nitrobenzene ——— Isophorone ——— 2-Nitrophenol ——— 2 , 4-Dimethylphenol ——— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane __ ——— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol ——— 1 , 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene ——— Naphthalene ——— 4-Chloroaniline ——— Hexachl orobutadiene ——— 4-Chloro-3-nethylphenol ——— 2 -Methy Inaphthalene ——— 2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol ——— 2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene ——— 2 -Nitroanil ine ——— Dimethylphthalate ——— 2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene ——— 3 -Nitroanil ine ——— Acenaphthene 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 930 380 930 380 380 380 930 380 D U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) £__ Leve1: (1ow/med) LOW % Moisture: __H decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2.0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 6.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No. : HB8-2 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-07-SA Lab File ID: B9748_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG y J J K 'I *> Q E 51—28—5 ——— 100-02-7 — 132-64-9 — 121-14-2 — 84-66-2 —— 7005-72-3- 86-73-7 —— 100-01-6 — 534-52-1 — 86-30-6 —— 101-55-3 — JLJLo / 1 i OT O £ K. *•> t ^ 1 O 120-12-7 — O 4T T * ** 84-74-2 —— 206-44-0 — 129-00-0 — QC £Q *7 91-94-1 —— 56-55-3 —— OT Q.ni _Q_ 117-81-7 — i i~7— Q4— n_ — 205-99-2 — -5 m r\o Q 50-32-8 —— 193-39-5 — 53-70-3 —— 191-24-2 — ———— 2 , 4-Dinitrophenol ———— 4 -Nitrophenol ———— Dibenzofuran ———— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene ————— Diethylphthalate ————— 4 -Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether __ ———— Fluorene ————— 4-Nitroaniline ————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ———— N-Nitrosodiphenyl amine ( 1 ) ————— 4 -Bromophenyl-phenyl ether ___ ———— Hexachlorobenzene ————— Pentachl orophenol ————— Phenanthrene ———— Anthracene ———— Carbazole ———— Di-n-butylphthalate ———— Fluoranthene ———— Pyrene ————— Butylbenzylphthalate ————— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine ————— Benzo(a) anthracene ———— Chrysene ———— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __ ————— Di-n-octylphthalate ———— Benzo(b) fluoranthene ————— Benzo (k) fluoranthene ———— Benzo ( a ) pyrene ———— Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) pyrene ———— Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ———— Benzo (g, h, i) perylene 930 930 380 380 380 380 380 930 930 380 380 380 930 380 380 380 380 180 180 380 380 120 150 84 380 200 70 110 58 380 77 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J U U J J J D J J J J U J (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine J J 0063 j J J J j IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) Q___ Level: (1ow/med) LOW % Moisture: __14 decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 (uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 6.0 Number TICs found: _4 Contract: SAS No.: HB8-2 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-07-SA Lab File ID: B9748_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 100527 4. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE UNKNOWN RT 5.61 6.13 8.26 37.20 EST. CONC. 11000 77 380 77 Q ABJ J BJ J J 0064 — _ — J J FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) Q__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __19 decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2.0fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S SDG No.: J J V J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-08-SA Lab File ID: B9749_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-7 3-1——————1,3 -Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene _____ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol____________" 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72 -1———————Hexachl oroethane______________ 98-95-3———r———Nitrobenzene________________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-2 0-3 ———————Naphthalene________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline__________ 87-68 -3 ———————Hexachl orobutadiene____________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_________ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocycloperitadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene___________ 88-74T4———————2-Nitroaniline_[___________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-9 6-8 ——————Acenaphthy 1 ene_______________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene_________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline_____________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene______________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 990 410 990 410 410 410 990 410 0065 FORM I SV-1 3/90 ] 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) Q__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____£ decanted: (Y/N) E_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y._ pH: 8.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB10-S SDG No.: J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-08-SA Lab File ID: B9749_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2, 4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73 -7———————Fluorene______________" 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_____________ 534-52-1——————4 , 6-Dinitro-2-nethylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) ~ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene________________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene______________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole_____________________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_______ 91-94-1———————3,3 • -Dichlorobenzidine_____ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene_________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene______________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) fluoranthene_______ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k) f luoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene__________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene____ 53-70-3———————Dibenz(a,h)anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h, i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 990 990 410 410 410 410 410 990 990 410 410 410 990 410 410 410 97 410 410 970 410 410 410 190 410 410 410 410 410 410 340 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J D U U U U J U U U U U U J 0066 J 3/90 J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) £__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __12 decanted: (Y/N) N._ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 8.2 Number TICs found: 21 Contract: SAS No.: HB10-S SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-08-SA Lab File ID: B9749_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. 4. 5. 1002842 6. 7. 57103 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE UNKNOWN UNKNOWN PENTADECANOIC ACID UNKNOWN HEXADECANOIC ACID UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 5.54 8.25 17.51 20.20 23.63 25.18 25.53 26.06 27.34 33.28 33.65 35.49 37.21 37.56 38.69 39.25 39.40 39.73 39.88 40.23 40.54 EST. CONC. 9700 280 82 120 160 120 330 120 82 210 410 450 820 • 250 450 740 330 530 1200 330 620 Q ABJ BJ J J JN J JN J J J J J J J J J J J- J J J 0067 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 J j J J J TCL Semivolatile Organics Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L OIL LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0009-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: Parameter Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methyl phenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Hethyl phenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachl oroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol Benzoic acid bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2, 4-Dichl orophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroanil ine Hexachl orobutadi ene 4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol 2-Methyl naphthal ene Hexachl orocyclo- pentadiene 2,4, 6-Tr i chl orophenol 2,4, 5-Tri chl orophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 8270 17 APR 13 MAY Result NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 680 ND ND ND 810 ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 93 93 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: 14 MAY 93 Reporting Limit 250 u 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 1200 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 1200 250 1200 250 250 1200 250 1200 1200 250 Enseco ND = Not detected NA - Not applicable o OR R (continued on following page) uuuo Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Faiza Botros J J V J J J J J J TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L OIL LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0009-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 13 MAY 93 Analyzed: 14 MAY 93 Parameter 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroanil ine 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Ni trosodi phenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo( a) anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz (a, h) anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol -d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tr i bromophenol Result ND ND ND ND 110 ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 29 ND 41 89 ND ND 45 280 46 28 30 . . ND 28 ND ND 33 Recovery 74 101 126 86 82 76 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % Reporting Limit 250 250 250 250 250 1200 1200 250 250 250 1200 250 250 250 250 250 250 500 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 J J J J J J J J J J J Enseco ND - Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) 0069 Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Faiza Botros ] TCL Semivolatile Organic* (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental 1 Client ID: HB3-L OIL LAYER I Lab ID: 028187-0009-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 , Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: 13 MAY 93 Analyzed: 14 MAY 93 J j J 1 J J J Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note J : Result is detected below the Reporting limit or is an . estimated concentration. nn?n ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Faiza Botros j Enseco .3 J J J Semivolatiles Library Search (20 Compound TIO) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter HB3-L OIL LAYER 028187-0009-SA WASTE 20 APR 93 Sampled: 17 APR 93 Prepared: NA Unknown n-Propylbenzene C-3 Benzene C-3 Benzene C-3 Benzene C-9 H-10 Isomer C-4 Benzene C-4 Benzene C-4 Benzene Hydrocarbon C-4 Benzene C-4 Benzene Methyl 2,3-dihydro 1 H Indene Isomer Methyl 2,3-dihydro 1 H Indene Isomer C-4 Benzene C-5 Benzene 1-Methylnaphthal ene Hydrocarbon Unknown Hydrocarbon Result Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: 14 MAY 93 Units Reporting Limit 340 720 580 2000 740 600 490 1200 410 250 450 520 350 380 340 340 460 440 390 410 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg J JJ J J J JJ J J J J J J JJJJ J J J J J J Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an •estimated concentration. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Faiza Botros 0071 J IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) _ Contract: SAS No.: TREATED TAP SDG No.: J Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000___(uL) Injection Volume: _____2 . 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: 7.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND J J J J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-10-SA Lab File ID: H5395______ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/24/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol____________________ 111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether______ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol______ 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine__ 67-72-1———————Hexachl oroe thane_____________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene______________ 78-59-1——————Isophorone__________________ 8 8 -75-5————————2 -Nitrophenol______________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol_________ lll-91-l——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene__________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline______________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene__________ 59-50-7 ———————4 -Chloro-3-methyIphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene__________ 77-47-4———————Hexachl o rocycl opent adi ene_____ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline____________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate__________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene____________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene__________________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline_______________ 83-32 -9———————Acenaphthene______________________ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 25 10 25 10 10 10 25 10 FORM I SV-1 U U D U D U U D U U U D D U U U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U •072 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000___(uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ pH: 7.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: TREATED TAP SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: 28187-10-SA Lab File ID: H5395_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/24/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran_____________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene __________________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_____________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)~ 101-55-3——————4-Br omopheny 1-pheny 1 ether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol________ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene______________ 12O-12-7——————Anthracene_____________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole_________________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-butylphthalate______ 206-44 -0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene__________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_________________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphth^late_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) f luoranthene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) f luoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene__________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene___ 53-70-3———————Dibenz( a, h) anthracene_______ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h,i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine 25 25 10 10 10 10 10 25 25 10 10 10 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U £073 FORM I SV-2 3/90 .J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ pH: 7.0 Number TICs found: _3 Contract: SAS No.: TREATED TAP SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-10-SA Lab File ID: H5395_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/24/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER 1. 123422 2. 3. COMPOUND NAME 2-PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-MET UNKNOWN UNKNOWN RT 6.22 6.95 11.09 EST. CONC. 27 2 7 Q JNB J J .J J 0074 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 250 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) _ Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L WATER SDG No.: J Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2_j_(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) £[_ pH: 9.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND J J J J J Lab Sample ID: 28187-11-SA Lab File ID: B9712_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: 50.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol______ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene__________ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol____________" 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane _________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_________________ 78-59-1——————Isophorone___________________ 88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Diaethylphenol__________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 91-20-3 ———————Naphthalene____________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline___________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene__________ 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene___________ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene___________ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline_________________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene__________________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene__________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline______________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_____________ 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2900 2000 2000 2000 3100 2000 2000 5000 2000 5000 2000 2000 2000 5000 2000 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuu uuuuuuuuuu )075 FORM I SV-1 3/90 J 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST___________ EPA SAMPLE NO. J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: __22. decanted: (Y/N) E_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: 7.2 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB5-2 3DL SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: 28187-04-DL Lab File ID: F2709_____ J j J Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ___10. 0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5 ———— • 100-02-7 ——— 132-64-9 ——— 121-14-2 ——— 84-66-2 ———— • 7005-72-3 —— • 86-73-7 ———— • 100-01-6 ——— 534-52-1 ——— • 86-30-6 ———— • 101-55-3 ——— • 118-74-1 ——— • 87-86-5 ———— • 85-01-8 ———— - 120-12-7 ——— • 86-74-8 ———— - 84-74-2 ———— • 206-44-0 ——— - 129-00-0 ——— • 85-68-7 ———— • 91-94-1 ———— • 56-55-3 ———— - 218-01-9 ——— - 117-81-7 ——— - 117-84-0 ——— • 205-99-2 ——— - 207-08-9 ——— - 50-32-8 ———— - 193-39-5 ——— • 53-70-3 ———— - "1 f\ ^ *% A •"* 191-24-2 ———— —— 2 , 4-Dinitrophenol ——— 4-Nitrophenol ——— Dibenzofuran —— 2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene ——— Diethylphthalate —— 4-chlorophenyl-phenylether __ ——— Fluorene ——— 4-Nitroaniline —— 4 , 6 -Dinitro-2 -methylphenol __ —— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ —— 4 -Bromophenyl-phenyl ether ___ —— Hexachlorobenzene —— Pentachlorophenol —— Phenanthrene —— Anthracene —— Carbazole —— Di-n-butylphthalate —— Fluoranthene —— Pyrene —— Butylbenzylphthalate —— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine —— Benzo (a) anthracene —— Chrysene —— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate —— Di -n-octy Iphthalat e —— Benzo (b) fluoranthene —— Benzo (k) fluoranthene —— Benzo(a)pyrene ' —— Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) pyrene — Dibenz( a, h) anthracene —— Benzo (g, h, i) perylene 10000 10000 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 10000 10000 4200 4200 4200 10000 470 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 470 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 U U U U U U U U U U D D U DJ D U U U U U U U U DJ U U D U U U U (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST j j Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 250 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000___(uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ pH: 9.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L WATER SDG No.: J Lab Sample ID: 28187-11-SA Lab File ID: B9712_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: ___50.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate___________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73 -7———————Fluorene_______________~ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_____________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 86-3 0-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) ~ 101-55-3——————4-Br omopheny l-phenylether_^ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene____________ 8 7 - 8 6 - 5——————Pentachl or ophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene____________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_____________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole______________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-butylphthalate_________ 206-44 -0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene____________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3———————Benzo( a) anthracene_______ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo(b) fluoranthene_______ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k)fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene_____________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene___ 53-70-3———————Dibenz(a,h)anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo(g,h,i)perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 5000 5000 2000 2000 2000 2000 530 5000 5000 2000 2000 2000 5000 790 2000 2000 2000 2000 410 2000 2000 2000 2000 1100 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 220 U U U U U U J U U U U U U J U U U U J U U U UJ U U U U U UJ 0078 FORM I SV-2 3/90 J J J J J J J J J IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 250 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) _ Contract: SAS No.: HB3-L WATER SDG No.: Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ pH: 9.0 Number TICs found: 18 Lab Sample ID: 28187-11-SA Lab File ID: B9712_____ Date Received: 04/20/93 Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: 50.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER 1. 103651 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 90120 16. 17. 18. COMPOUND NAME BENZENE, PROPYL- C-3 BENZENE ISOMER C-3 BENZENE ISOMER C-3 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER HYDROCARBON C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-4 BENZENE ISOMER 2, 3 -DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE 2, 3 -DIHYDROMETHYL 1H-INDENE C-4 BENZENE ISOMER C-5 BENZENE ISOMER NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL- DIMTHYL NAPHTHALENE ISOMER HYDROCARBON HYDROCARBON RT 7.87 8.13 8.45 8.84 10.27 10.67 10.87 11.23 11.56 11.63 12.05 12.23 12.28 13.19 15.45 17.13 21.77 24.37 EST. CONC. 2300 1900 2500 5200 4500 1900 4700 1500 1800 2100 1500 1800 1500 1500 1900 1100 2200 1300 Q JN J J J J J J J J J J J J J JN J J J 0077 J J FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 J J J ———^———————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR *<-™««(...m^ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB2-4.5 Lab ID: 028187-0001-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 670 mg/kg 120 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 1 Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:5 dilution. Percent Moisture is 18%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight ND - Not detected NA «= Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno I J J J J J J J j J J J J ———————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR '"'"'^ *•"••-•" Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: H83-3.0 Lab ID: 028187-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND mg/kg 27 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable j Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno j J ————————————————————————- Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR v..-"....^.-™ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB4-2.5 Lab ID: 028187-0003-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 200 mg/kg 25 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected 0080 NA - Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno J J J J J J ————————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR »«..™-«...-, Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB5-2.3 Lab ID: 028187-0004-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1800 mg/kg 610 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 1 Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:25 dilution. Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. » ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno J J J J J J ——^—————————————————- Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR ^.«-<v.™ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB6-1.5 Lab ID: 028187-0005-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 170 mg/kg 23 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB7-1.25 028187-0006-SA Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: SOIL 20 APR 93 Sampled: 18 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Received: 20 APR 93 Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 67 Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method mg/kg 24 418.1 Prepared Analyzed Date Date 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 15%. All results 'and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. 0083 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable J J J J J J J ———————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR *k""'"c^""~ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB8-2 Lab ID: 028187-0007-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 24 mg/kg 24 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 15%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected nn«;i NA - Not applicable UUO4 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno j J J ——————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB10-S Lab ID: 028187-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 73 rag/kg 24 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 J Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected -1 NA - Not applicable 1 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno ^~s J J —— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR A,..«««*.„„ s"-" Client Name: Cooper Environmental } Client ID: HB3-L OIL LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0009-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below ] Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum ' Hydrocarbons 1200000 mg/kg 1000000 3550/418.1 Mod. 03 MAY 93 04 MAY 93 1 J J J ...J J J 1 J Note 1 ^All results taken from a 1:1000 dilution. J NO = Not detected NA - Not applicable 0086 | Reported By: David Hricko Approved By: Joe Dininno J j J J ———————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR <——_.™ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: TREATED TAP Lab ID: 028187-0010-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND mg/L 0.50 418.1 22 APR 93 23 APR 93 J j J J J j 0087 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Neil Costanza ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable -•—" J j —————————————————————————— Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR * «.••"-..:.. .•*,,., Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L WATER LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0011-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1900 mg/L 250 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 IR Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:100 dilution. Note R :, Reporting limit changed due to sample volume limitations. ND - Not detected 0083 NA - Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno 2B SOIL VOLATILE SYSTEM MONITORING COMPOUND RECOVERY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ Contract: __________ SAS No. : ______ J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 2S187 Level:(low/med) LOW SDG No. ,J J 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB10-SRE HB2-4.5 HB4-2J5 HB6-X5 HB7-125 HB7-1.25DL HB8-2 VBLK01 VBLK07 SMC1 (TOL) j? 110 110 99 101 105 105 105 102 99 102 SMC2 (BFB)* 92 92 96 94 95 91 95 92 102 100 SMC3 (DCE)3 105 100 97 97 100 100 100 98 97 102 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOT OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QC LIMITS SMC1 (TOL) = Toluene-d8 ( 84-138) SMC2 (BFB) = Broraofluorobenzene ( 59-113) SMC3 (DCE) = l,2-Dichloroethane-d4( 70-121) # Column to be used to flag recovery values * Values outside of contract required QC limits D System Monitoring Compound diluted out J 0089 FORM II VOA-2 3/90 J 2B SOIL VOLATILE SYSTEM MONITORING COMPOUND RECOVERY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: __________ SAS No.: Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Level:(low/med) MED SDG No. : I 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-3.0 HB3-L OIL HB3-L OILDL HB4-25DL HB5-2.3 VBLK02 VBLK04 VBLK06 SMC1 (TOL) # 95 94 88 101 98 101 100 99 SMC2 (BFB)# 102 96 97 106 105 103 103 101 SMC3 (DCE)# 99 93 88 104 105 104 102 103 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOT OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QC LIMITS SMC1 (TOL) = Toluene-d8 ( 84-138) SMC2 (BFB) = Bromofluorobenzene ( 59-113) SMC3 (DCE) = l,2-Dichloroethane-d4( 70-121) # Column to be used to flag recovery values * Values outside of contract required QC limits D System Monitoring Compound diluted out 0090 J J FORM II VOA-2 3/90 2A WATER VOLATILE SYSTEM MONITORING COMPOUND RECOVERY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: __________ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: J J 01 02 03 04 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L WATER TREATED TAP VBLK03 VBLK05 SMC1 (TOL) f 100 98 100 98 SMC2 (BFB)* 106 102 105 98 SMC3 (DCE)# 102 104 102 102 OTHER 0 0 0 0 TOT OUT 0 0 0 0 QC LIMITS SMC1 (TOL) = Toluene-d8 ( 88-110) SMC2 (BFB) = Bromofluorobenzene ( 86-115) SMC3 (DCE) = l,2-Dichloroethane-d4( 76-114) % Column to be used to flag recovery values * Values outside of contract required QC limits D System Monitoring Compound diluted out j J 0091 FORM II VOA-1 3/90 2C WATER SEHIVOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: 01 02 03 04 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L WATER TREATED TAP SBLK02 SBLK01 SI (NBZ)# 60 59 55 59 S2 (FBP)jf 22 * 56 49 56 S3 (TPH)| 32 * 64 60 75 S4 (PHL) I 45 58 52 52 S5 (2FP)| 41 60 55 52 S6 (TBP) f 47 60 57 79 S7 (2CP)f 59 56 51 55 S8 (DCB)f 46 56 54 57 TOT OUT 2 0 0 0 QC LIMITS 51 (NBZ) = Nitrobenzene-d5 ( 35-114) 52 (FBP) = 2-Fluorobiphenyl ( 43-116) 53 (TPH) = Terphenyl-dl4 ( 33-141) 54 (PHL) = Phenol-d5 ( 10-110) 55 (2FP) = 2-Fluorophenol ( 21-110) 56 (TBP) = 2,4,6-Tribronophenol ( 10-123) 57 (2CP) = 2-Chlorophenol-d4 ( 33-110) 58 (DCB) = l,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 ( 16-110) (advisory) (advisory) # Column to be used to flag recovery values * Values outside of contract required QC limits D Surrogate diluted out 0092 FORM II SV-1 3/90 2D SOIL SEMIVOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Level:(low/Bed) LOW Contract: SAS No.: SDG No.: J J J J 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB2-4 5 HB3-3 0 HB4-2 5 HB5-2 3 HB5-2 3DL HB6-1 5 HB7-1 25 HB8-2 SBLK03 SBLK04 SI (NBZ)# 47 37 49 41 34 26 45 39 53 56 34 S2 (FBP) # 55 43 53 51 42 52 52 48 57 54 40 S3 (TPH) I 67 58 61 65 80 79 75 56 70 63 60 S4 (PHL) | 47 34 42 39 33 24 38 36 47 51 34 S5 (2FP)| 39 34 42 37 37 51 35 33 39 50 41 S6 (TBP) f 71 52 62 54 38 37 48 58 60 58 53 S7 (2CP)# 45 36 44 39 35 40 40 36 43 53 37 S8 (DCB)| 40 39 47 44 37 63 47 39 47 56 39 TOT OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QC LIMITS 51 (NB2) = Nitrobenzene-d5 ( 23-120) 52 (FBP) = 2-Fluorobiphenyl ( 30-115) 53 (TPH) = Terphenyl-dl4 ( 18-137) 54 (PHL) = Phenol-d5 ( 24-113) 55 (2FP) = 2-Fluorophenol ( 25-121) 56 (TBP) = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol ( 19-122) 57 (2CP) = 2-Chlorophenol-d4 ( 20-130) 58 (DCS) = l/2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 ( 20-130) (advisory) (advisory) I Column to be used to flag recovery values * Values outside of contract required QC limits D Surrogate diluted out J 0093 -~1 -— J J FORM II SV-2 3/90 Surrogate Recoveries UASTE Method 8270 Client NMK: Cooper EnvironmentaI Enteco Sample ID: Client Swple ID: QC Run Nunber: Analyte Hi trobenxene-eS 2- f I uorobi phony I Terph«nyi-d14 Phenol -d5 2 - fl uor opheno I 2.4,6-Tribronophenol Units X X X X X X 02B1B7-0009-SA HB3-L OIL LATER 13 NAT 93- V Surrogate Method Value Footnote Blank 74 87 101 102 126 89 86 100 82 94 76 81 Advisory QC Limits 23-120 30-115 18-137 24-113 25-121 19-122 J J J J J J 0094 >sw-^ J J 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID: C4777_____ Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530(non) Contract: SAS No. : EPA SAMPLE NO. VBLK01 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 25APR93-A Time Analyzed: 1016 Heated Purge: (Y/N) Y_ Instrument ID: HP-V3 THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 02 03 04 05 06 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB2-4.5 HB4-2.5 HB6-1.5 HB7-L25 HB8-2 LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-08-SA 28187-01-SA 28187-03-SA 28187-05-SA 28187-06-SA 28187-07-SA LAB FILE ID C4781 C4785 C4787 C4778 C4779 C4780 TIME ANALYZED 1246 1514 1628 1054 1131 1209 COMMENTS: 0095 FORM IV VOA 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK01 SDG No.: Lab Sanple ID: MB_25APR93-A Lab File ID: C4777_____ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________\ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127 -18-4 ——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene______'___________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7——-——Xylene (total)__________ 10 10 10 10 10 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuJuuuuuuJ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .(UL) 0095 FORM I VGA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: __0 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK01 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 25APR93-A Lab File ID: C4777_____ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 0097 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST _________ Contract: Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 23187 SAS No.: Lab File ID: Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP C4794 Instrument ID: 04/26/93 ID: 0.530fsun) HP-V3 VBLK02 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 26APR93-A Time Analyzed: 1227 Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB5-2.3 LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-04-SA LAB FILE ID C4800 TIME ANALYZED 1612 COMMENTS: 0093 FORM IV VOA 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 2S1S7 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (run) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK02 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 26APR93-A Lab File ID: C4794______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/26/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uL) Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3————————Chloronethane___________ 74-83-9————————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodlchloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2————————Bromoform____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34T5———————1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3 ———————Toluene__________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4 ——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0099 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: _O Contract: SAS No.: VBLK02 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB_26APR93-A Lab File ID: C4794_____ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/26/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 fuLl CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1 ft FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1 J 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 C4813_____ 04/27/93 ___ ID: 0.530fcun) HP-V3 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB-27APR93-A Time Analyzed: 1257 Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. TREATED_TAP LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-10-SA LAB FILE ID C4827 TIME ANALYZED 2233 COMMENTS: 0100 FORM IV VOA 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW _._ % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP_____ ID: 0.530 (mm) _____ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB-27APR93-A Lab File ID: C4813______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Extract Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromorae thane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4 ———————— 1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chlorofora_____________ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4 ———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_________ 10061-01-5—————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6—————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene__________ 79-34-5 ——————— l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______f____________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 10 10 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuJ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uu .(uL) 0101 FORM I VOA 3/90 J J j IE VOLATILE ORGAKICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: __1 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB-27APR93-A Lab File ID: C4813_____ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil "Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(uL) CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 26.24 EST. CONC. 7 Q J J J 0102 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID: C4814_____ Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP____ 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY Contract: ______ SAS No.: ______ EPA SAMPLE NO. VBLK04 SDG No.: Instrument ID: 04/27/93 ID: 0.530fmnO HP-V3 Lab Sample ID: MB 27APR93-B Time Analyzed: 1335 Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: J 01 02 03 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-3.0 HB3-L OILDL HB4-2.5DL LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-02-SA 28187-09DL-SA 28187-03DL-SA LAB FILE ID C4815 C4817 C4816 TIME ANALYZED 1413 1543 1458 COMMENTS: V .-J _J 0103 FORM IV VOA 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST J Lab Code: EEAST _ Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK04 SDG No.: J J J J CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: MB 27APR93-B Lab File ID: C4814______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ______1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3————————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9 ——————Bromome thane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_________________' 107-06-2 ——————— 1, 2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Tri Chloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichlbropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5 ——————— l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5———————Styrene___________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 580 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 U U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0104 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: __Q Contract: SAS No.: VBLK04 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: MB 27APR93-B Lab File ID: C4814______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: 100__(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 0105 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 J 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 C4831_____ 04/28/93 • ID: 0.530fmml HP-V3 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK05 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 28APR93-A Time Analyzed: 1233 Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L_WATER LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-11-SA LAB FILE ID C4834 TIME ANALYZED 1425 COMMENTS: 3 J O J O G FORM IV VOA 3/90 J EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ '1 J Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/nL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0. 530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK05 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 28APR93-A Lab File ID: C4831______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 \ J 3 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UGy 74-37-3———————Chlorcrethane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromomezhane_______________ 75-01-4———————vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chlorofora______________'_ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_____________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-—————Bromof onn________;________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______'____________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)___________ 10 10 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .(uL) FORM I VOA t 107 3/90 J J J J j IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: _______ (uL) Number TICs found: __0 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK05 SDG No.: Lab Sample.ID: MB 28APR93-A Lab File ID: C4831______ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UC CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q J 0108" FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1 J j 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 C4832_____ 04/28/93 ___ ID: 0.530(mml HP-V3 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK06 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 28APR93-B Time Analyzed: 1311 Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L_OIL LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-09-SA LAB FILE ID C4835 TIME ANALYZED 1503 COMMENTS: J j 0109 FORM IV VOA 3/90 J 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. :1 3 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK06 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 28APR93-B Lab File ID: C4832_____ Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 ,1 J J J J J J CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: 100 (uL) Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ———— c^oi— "7Q.-.C _ _ 127-18-4 ———— 79-3475 ————— 1 n Q QQ_^_ _ T OQ— QH "7 _ _ 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— - —— Chlorome thane • —— Broraomethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroe thane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone • —— Carbon Disulfide • —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene • —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochlorome thane —— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2 -Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 430 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 U U U U U J U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0110 FORM I VOA 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (nun) Soil Extract Volume: 10000 (uL) Number TICs found: __Q Contract: SAS No. : VBLK06 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 28APR93-B Lab File ID: C4832_____ Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Voluiae: 100 fuL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 0111 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 4A VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 C4859_____ 04/29/93 ___ ID: 0.530(mm) HP-V3 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK07 SDG No. : Lab Sample ID: MB 29APR93-C Time Analyzed: 1800 Heated Purge: (Y/N) Y_ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 02 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-SRE HB7-X25DL LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-08RE-SA 28187-06DL-SA LAB FILE ID C4860 C4864 TIME ANALYZED 1837 2110 COMMENTS: J j J J Oil J J FORM IV VOA 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. J „ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/niL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _________ (uL) Contract: SAS No.: VBLK07 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: M3_29APR93-C Lab File ID: C4859_____ Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 j J J J j CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9 ———————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————X, 1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3————————Chloroform______________' 107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5————————1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6—————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Broooforn______________ 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______'____________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 10 10 10 10 2 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 2 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuJJuuuuuuJJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .(uL) FORM I VOA 3/90 J J IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _1 Contract: SAS No.: VBLK07 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: MB 29APR93-C Lab File ID: C4859_____ Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 26.27 EST. CONC. 7 Q J 0114 J J FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 4B SEMIVOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 B9706_____ HP-SI Contract: SAS No.: SBLK01 SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Level:(low/med) LOW Lab Sample ID: WMB-28APR93B Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Time Analyzed: 1622 THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L_WATER LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-11-SA LAB FILE ID B9712 DATE ANALYZED 05/03/93 COMMENTS: .1 j j 0115 FORM IV SV 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. 0 3 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1OOO (g/nL) ML Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000___(uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ pH: 5.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: SBLK01 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: WMB-28APR93B Lab File ID: B9706______ Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 3 I I 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8——————-2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_________ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_________ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________' 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachlo roe thane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene___________________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone____________________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Diaethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2———————2,4-Dichlorophenol_________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_______ 91-20-3 ———————Naphthal ene______________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_____________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene___________ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol_____ 95-95-4———————2,4 ,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74T4———————2-NitroanilineJ______________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate_________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene____________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________ 83-32 -9———————Acenaphthene______________ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 25 10 25 10 10 10 25 10 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 116 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Nane: ENSECO-EAST________________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000___(uL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ pH: 5.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No. : SBLK01 SDG No.: J J J 7 j Lab Sample ID: WMB-28APR93B Lab File ID: B9706_______ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran_______________________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene________ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chl orophenyl-phenyl ether_ 86-73-7 ———————Fluorene_______________" 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_________________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)" 101-55-3——————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether___ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene__________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene_________________ 120-12-7—————-Anthracene____________________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole______________ 84-74-2 ———————Di-n-buty Iphthalate________ 206-44 - 0——————Fluoranthene__________________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene_____________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_________ 91-94 -1———————3,3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine_______ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene___________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_______•'_________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate_ 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate______ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b)fluoranthene________ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) fluoranthene______ 50-32-8———————Benzo(a)pyrene_______________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene____ 53-70-3———————Dibenz(a,h) anthracene_____ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g, h, i) perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine FORM I SV-2 25 25 10 10 10 10 10 25 25 10 10 10 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuu D Uuuuuu D U U Uuuuuu D U U U U D U U U 0117 3/90 IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuL) Contract: SAS No.: SBLK01 SDG No.: Injection Volume: ____2. OfuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ Number TICs found: _0 Lab Sample ID: WMB-28APR93B Lab File ID: B9706______ Date Received: __________ Date Extracted: 04/28/93 Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Dilution Factor: ____1. 0 PH: 5.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 0118 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 4B SEMIVOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 H5404_____ HP-56 Contract: SAS No.: SBLK02 SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Level:(low/med) LOW Lab Sample ID: WMB-22APR93B Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Time Analyzed: 1231 THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 EPA SAMPLE NO. TREATED_TAP LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-10-SA LAB FILE ID H5395 DATE ANALYZED 04/24/93 COMMENTS: FORM IV SV 0119 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST___________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW * Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) _ Contract: SAS No.: SBLK02 SDG No.: Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuL) Injection Volume: _____2 . 0 (up GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N_ pH: 5.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: WMB-22APR93B Lab File ID: H5404______ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether______ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene__________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________ 108-60-1——————2,2 ' -oxybis (1-Chloropropane) 106-44-5——————4-Methy Iphenol___________' 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylanine_____ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane _________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene________________________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone__________________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2, 4-DimethyIphenol_________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_____________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Tri chl orobenz ene________ 91-20-3 ———————Naphthal ene__________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_____________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene____________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol______ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_________ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_____ 88-06-2———————2,4 , 6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4 ———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chl or ©naphthalene________ 88-7 4-4 ———————2 -Nitroanil ine_______________ 131-11-3 ——————Dimethy Iphthalate_________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene_______________ 606-20-2—————-2, 6-Dinitrotoluene________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________ 8 3-32-9 ———————Acenaphthene______________ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 25 10 25 10 10 10 25 10 Uu Uuuuuuuu D U Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 0120 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW * Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) _ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 Injection Volume: ____2.0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fi_ pH: 5.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: SBLK02 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: WMB-22APR93B Lab File ID: H5404_____ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 51-28-5———————2 , 4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran____________ 121-14 -2——————2,4 -Dinitrotoluene________ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene___._____________~ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline__________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (l)~ 101-55-3——————4-Broaiophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol________ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene____________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene______________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole_______________ 84-7 4-2———————Di-n-buty Iphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene__________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzy Iphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine____ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene_______ 218-01-9——————Chrysene________________ 117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate_ 117-84-0——————Di-n-octy Iphthalate________ 205-99-2——————Benzo(b) fluoranthene______ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k)fluoranthene______ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) pyrene_____________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene____ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h) anthracene_____ 191-24-2 ——————Benzo (g, h, i) perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 25 25 10 10 10 10 10 25 25 10 10 10 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuu D U D U U U U U U U Uuuuuu D U U UJuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 3/90 j J j IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Naae: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW * Moisture: ___ decanted: (Y/N) __ Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 fuLl Injection Volume: ____2. OfuLl GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: 5.0 Number TICs found: _1 Contract: SAS No.: SBLK02 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: WMB-22APR93B Lab File ID: H5404_____ Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 04/22/93 Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER 1. 123422 COMPOUND NAME 2-PENTANONE, 4 -HYDROXY-4 -MET RT 6.20 EST. CONC. 23 Q JN J J J J 0122 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 D 1 i 4B SEMIVOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 B9715_____ HP-SI Contract: SAS No.: SBLK03 SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Level:(low/med) LOW Lab Sample ID: SMB-23APR93A Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Time Analyzed: 1016___ THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB2-4 5 HB3-3 0 HB4-2 5 HB6-1 5 HB7-1 25 HB8-2 LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-08-SA 28187-01-SA 28187-02-SA 28187-03-SA 28187-05-SA 28187-06-SA 28187-07-SA LAB FILE ID B9749 B9738 B9739 B9740 B9742 B9743 B9748 DATE ANALYZED 05/06/93 05/05/93 05/05/93 05/05/93 05/05/93 05/05/93 05/06/93 COMMENTS: 3 J FORM IV SV 0123 3/90 J IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vt/vol: 30.0 (g/nL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) H_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: SBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: SMB-23APR93A Lab File ID: B9715_____ Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KC 108-95-2———————Phenol_____________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-48-7———————2-Methyl phenol____________ 108-60-1——————2,2' -oxybis (l-Chloropropane)_ 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine__ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_____________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol_____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-ChJLoroethoxy) methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3———————Naphthalene_______________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline___________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-inethylphenol_____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene________ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocycloperitadiene______ 88-06-2———————2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———-———2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________ 88-7474——————2-Nitroaniline___________________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate___________ 208-96-8 ——————Acenaphthy1 ene________________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene____________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________ 83-3 2-9 ———————Acenaphthene__________________ 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 800 330 800 330 330 330 800 330 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U D U D U U U U U U 124 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Nane: ENSECO-EAST_____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vt/vol: 30. 0 (g/nL) G____ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: _____ decanted: (Y/N) £__ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 Injection Volume: _____2_-_0(uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) I_ pH: CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: SBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: SMB-23APR93A Lab File ID: B9715_______ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG •2,4-Dinitrotoluene_ -Diethylphthalate_ -Pentachlorophenol_ -Phenanthrene____ -Anthracene______ -Carbazole 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol___" 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran 121-14-2——— 84-66-2————— 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene________________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_____________ 534-52-1——————4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)~ 101-55-3——————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene 87-86-5——————- 85-01-8———————- 120-12-7———— 86-74-8————— 84-74-2————— 206-44-0———— 129-00-0----- 85-68-7———— 91-94-1———— 56-55-3———— 218-01-9——— 117-81-7———— 117-84-0———— 205-99-2———— 207-08-9———— 50-32-8———— 193-39-5----- 53-70-3————— 191-24-2———— • Di-n-buty1phthalate_ •Fluoranthene_____~ •Pyrene_ -Butylbenzylphthalate -3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine_ -Benzo(a)anthracene_____ -Chrysene_ -bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. -Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ - Benzo (b) fluoranthene________ -Benzo(k)fluoranthene_____ -Benzo(a)pyrene_' •Indeno(l,2, 3-cd)pyrene_ •Dibenz(a, h)anthracene__ •Benzo(g,h,ijperylene__ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 800 800 330 330 330 330 330 800 800 330 330 330 800 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 D U D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U 0125 FORM I SV-2 3/90 J "] .] ] IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) H_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2.0 fuL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) X_ pH: ___ Number TICs found: _3 Contract: SAS No.: SBLK03 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: SMB-23APR93A Lab File ID: B9715_____ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 04/23/93 Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 100527 3. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN BENZALDEHYDE SUBSTITUTED HEXANEDIOIC ACID RT 5.51 8.23 30.44 EST. CONC. 12000 110 67 Q AJ J J j 3 J 3 0126 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 J 4B SEMIVOIATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Lab File ID: Instrument ID: Case No.: 28187 F2708_____ HP-S4 Contract: SAS No.: SBLK04 SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Level:(low/med) LOW Lab Sample ID: SMB-18MAY93D Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Time Analyzed: 1318 THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: 01 02 EPA SAMPLE NO. HB5-2 3 HB5-2_3DL LAB SAMPLE ID 28187-04-SA 28187-04-DL LAB FILE ID F2707 F2709 DATE ANALYZED 05/21/93 05/21/93 COMMENTS: 0127 FORM IV SV 3/90 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGAh'ICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) N Contract: SAS No.: SBLK04 SDG No.: Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: SMB-18MAY93D Lab File ID: F2708_____ Date Received: _______ __ Date Extracted: 05/18/93 .(uL) Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol___________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether_____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-48 -7———————2-Methvlphenol _____________ 108-60-1——————2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)_ 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine__ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_____________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone__________________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol_____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol_________ 111-91-1———————bis C2-Chloroethoxy) methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol__________ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-2 0-3 ———————Naphthalene________________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_____________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene_______ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphenol_____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4 ———————Hexa chl or ocy clopentadi ene_____ 88-06-2———————2,4 , 6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________ 88-74T4———————2-Nitroaniline_;____________ 131-11-3——————Dimethylphthalate__________ 208-96-8——————Acenaphthylene______________ 606-20-2——————2, 6-Dinitrotoluene_________ 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline___________ 83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene______________ 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 800 330 800 330 330 330 800 330 D D U U D U U U U U D D D U U D U D D D U D D U U D D D D D D D U 3128 FORM I SV-1 3/90 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30. 0 (g/mL) G__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: ____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: SAS No.: SBLK04 SDG No.: J J J j V—^ J Lab Sample ID: SMB-18MAY93D Lab File ID: F2708______ Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 51-28-5———————2, 4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol____________ 132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran______________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene______________~ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1——————4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)" 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether__] 118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene___________________ 120-12-7———————Anthracene_______________ 86-74-8———————Carbazole_________________ 84-74 -2 ———————Di-n-butyIphthalate______ 206-44 -0——————Fluoranthene_________________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3 • -Dichlorobenzidine____ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene_______________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0——————Di-n-octylphthalate_____~ 205-99-2——————Benzo(b) fluoranthene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) f luoranthene_____ 50-32-8——————Benzo(a)pyrene_________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene____ 53-70-3———————Dibenz (a,h)anthracene____ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h, ijperylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 800 800 330 330 330 330 330 800 800 330 330 330 800 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D OJ2S 3/90 IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G.__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: ____ decanted: (Y/N) N_ Concentrated Extract Volume: 500.0 fuL) Injection Volume: _____2 . 0 (uL) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y_ pH: ___ Number TICs found: _2 Contract: SAS No.: SBLK04 SDG No.: Lab Sample ID: SMB-18MAY93D Lab File ID: F2708______ Date Received: _______ Date Extracted: 05/18/93 Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 2. 123422 COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN 2-PENTANONE, 4 -HYDROXY-4 -MET RT 5.79 6.95 EST. CONC. 200 4300 Q J AJN 0130 FORM I SV-TIC 3/90 QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT UST - Dedicated Work-Cell Laboratory Enseco o i Laboratory Sample Number 028187-0001-SA 028187-0002-SA 028187-0003-SA 028187-0004-SA 028187-0005-SA 028187-0006-SA 028187-0007-SA 028187-0008-SA 028187-0009-SA 028187-0010-SA 028187-0011-SA QC Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL WASTE AQUEOUS AQUEOUS QC Category TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-S TPH-IR-W TPH-IR-A TPH-IR-A QC Lot Number (DCS) 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 03 MAY 93-C 26 MAR 93-A 28 APR 93-A QC Run Number (SCS/BLANK) 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-A 03 MAY 93-C 22 APR 93-A 28 APR 93-B 3 .0 J I 013J J J J Enseo DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT UST - Dedicated Work-Cell Laboratory Analyte Concentration Spiked Measured DCS1 DCS2 AVG Accuracy Precis Average(%) (RP DCS Limits DCS Lii Category: TPH-IR-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 28 APR 93-A Concentration Units: mg/kg Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 50 49.7 51.6 50.6 101 75-125 3.8 Category: TPH-IR-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 03 MAY 93-C Concentration Units: mg/kg Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 2500 2460 2900 2680 107 75-125 16 j i Category: TPH-IR-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 26 MAR 93-A Concentration Units: mg/L Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Category: TPH-IR-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 28 APR 93-A Concentration Units: mg/L Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 5.0 4.4 4.6 5.0 4.8 4.7 4.5 90 75-125 4.4 4.8 95 75-125 2.1 Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results 0132 J J Enseco METHOD BLANK REPORT UST - Dedicated Work-Cell Laboratory 1 Analyte Test: TPH-IR-SOX-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 28 APR 93-A Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Result Reporting Units Limit QC Run: 28 APR 93-A ND mg/kg 20 .] Test: TPH-IR-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 03 MAY 93-C Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons QC Run: 03 MAY 93-C ND mg/kg 1000 Test: TPH-IR-LAB-CHRON-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 26 MAR 93-A QC Run: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 22 APR 93-A NO mg/L 0.50 J 3 Test: TPH-IR-LAB-CHRON-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 28 APR 93-A QC Run: 28 APR 93-B Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND mg/L 0.50 J 0 0133 1 8A VOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ _____ SDG No. : Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 SAS No.: Lab File ID (Standard): C4776_____ Instrument ID: HP-V3 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530(mm) Heated Purge: (Y/N) Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Time Analyzed: 0939___ 0 J 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT E?A SAMPLE NO. H310-S H32-4.5 HB4-25 H36-X5 HB7-X25 HB8-2 VBLK01 ISl(BCM) AREA # 75477 150954 37738 38545 75982 85117 68287 51626 86847 76141 RT « 7.70 8.20 7.20 7.73 7.72 7.72 7.72 7.72 7.71 7.72 IS2(DFB) AREA 3 340956 681912 170478 160344 * 350722 386090 302809 227857 383607 342222 RT * 9.50 10.00 9.00 9.51 9.50 9.51 9.52 9.52 9.51 9.50 IS3(CBZ) AREA $ 286316 572632 143158 112139 * 283982 309685 239577 176014 303817 286908 RT * 17.24 17.74 16.74 17.28 17.25 17.27 17.28 17.27 17.27 17.27 151 (BCM) = Bromochloromethane 152 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenzene 153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J FORM VIII VOA 0134 3/90 J 0 3 8A VOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 SAS No.: Lab File ID (Standard): C4792_____ Instrument ID: HP-V3 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530fmm) SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 04/26/93 Time Analyzed: 1106___ Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ D J § 01 02 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. VBLK02 ISl(BCM) AREA # 95999 191998 48000 86505 90438 RT 3 7.73 8.23 7.23 7.71 7.74 IS2(DFB) AREA # 436437 872874 218218 399654 406269 RT f 9.51 10.01 9.01 9.52 9.52 IS3(CBZ) AREA # 356783 713566 178392 343188 345181 RT $ 17.26 17.76 16.76 17.26 17.26 151 (BCM) = Bromochloromethane 152 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenzene 153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J J FORM VIII VOA 0135 3/90 8A VOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: __________ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: _____ Lab File ID (Standard) : C4811_____ Date Analyzed: 04/27/93 Instrument ID: HP-V3 Time Analyzed: 1142 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530(mm) Heated Purge: (Y/N) N_ 01 02 03 04 05 06 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-3.0 HB3-L OILDL HB4-23DL TREATED TAP VBLK03 VBLK04 ISl(BCM) AREA S 97826 195652 48913 82992 80256 84222 87555 88021 87350 RT 1 7.71 8.21 7.21 7.72 7.71 7.71 7.72 7.72 7.72 IS2(DFB) AREA * 447429 894858 223714 393071 373134 392416 403567 393765 395028 RT # 9.51 10.01 9.01 9.52 9.50 9.51 9.52 9.50 9.50 IS3(CBZ) AREA # 372350 744700 186175 336542 309421 333183 347387 341100 337017 RT # 17.26 17.76 16.76 17.28 17.27 17.27 17.28 17.26 17.25 151 (BCM) = Brojnochloronethane 152 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenzene 153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. S Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. FORM VIII VOA OJ36 3/90 1 8A VOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ Contract: __________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 2S187 Lab File ID (Standard): C4829_____ Instrument ID: HP-V3 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530(mm) SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 04/28/93 Time Analyzed: 1118_____ Heated Purge: (Y/N) £__ 01 02 03 04 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L OIL HB3-L WATER VBLK05 VBLK06 ISl(BCM) AREA 3 94595 189190 47298 82070 88183 87549 87548 RT § 7.71 8.21 7.21 7.73 7.74 7.72 7.73 IS2(DFB) AREA $ 426010 852020 213005 391026 401510 403330 406220 RT f 9.51 10.01 9.01 9.52 9.53 9.52 9.53 IS3(CBZ) AREA # 355879 711758 177940 314284 344465 348556 346932 RT « 17.26 17.76 16.76 17.25 17.26 17.26 17.26 151 (BCM) = Bromochloromethane 152 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenzene 153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. OJ37 FORM VIII VOA 3/90 j 1 1 8A VOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): C4856_____ Instrument ID: HP-V3 GC Column: CAP______ ID: 0.530rmm) SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 04/29/93 Time Analyzed: 1608 Heated Purge: (Y/N) Y_ 01 02 03 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-SRE HB7-L25DL VBLK07 ISl(BCM) AREA * 58475 116950 29238 34449 55972 52410 RT « 7.71 8.21 7.21 7.71 7.71 7.72 IS2(DFB) AREA * 274041 548082 137020 147948 251332 246013 RT # 9.51 10.01 9.01 9.51 9.52 9.50 IS3(CBZ) AREA * 229712 459424 114856 107759 * 202733 213369 RT # 17.28 17.78 16.78 17.28 17.29 17.28 151 (BCM) = Bronochloronethane 152 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenzene 153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. $ Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. ] 1 FORM VIII VOA O J 3 8 3/90 8B SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): B9704_____ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/03/93 Time Analyzed: 1416___ J J 01 02 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L WATER SBLK01 ISl(DCB) AREA * 5057 10114 2528 6812 5273 RT * 9.28 9.78 8.78 9.27 9.27 IS2 (NPT) AREA * 20271 40542 10136 26464 17408 RT 3 12.96 13.46 12.46 12.95 12.94 IS3(ANT) AREA f 14163 28326 7082 19230 12372 RT | 18.37 18.87 17.87 18.37 18.36 151 (DCS) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 152 (NPT) = Naphthalene-dS 153 (ANT) = Acenaphthene-dIO AREA UPPER LIMIT - + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. I Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J J ,1 FORM VIII SV-1 OJ39 3/90 1 J 8C SEKIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ Contract: Lab C Lab F Instn 01 02 IS4 IS5 IS6 ode: EEAST ile ID (Stand, unent ID: HP-.' Case No. : ard) : B9704 51 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB3-L WATER SBLK01 IS4 (PHN) AREA S 24647 49294 12324 30028 25080 28187 RT $ 23.00 23.50 22.50 23.01 22.98 SAS No. : IS5(CRY) AREA # 25032 50064 12516 20262 26504 SDG No. : Date AJ Time AJ RT * 31.33 31.83 30.83 31.40 31.29 lalyzed: 05/03/93 lalvzed: 1416 IS6(PRY) AREA # 27409 54818 13704 21354 30390 RT # 35.46 35.96 34.96 35.52 35.43 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dlO (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50* of internal standard area. . RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes' of internal standard RT. I Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J J FORM VIII SV-2 OJ40- 3/90 J 1 SB SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): B9714______ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No. : Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Time Analyzed: 0914___ 1 J IS1 IS2 IS3 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. SBLK03 ISl(DCB) AREA # 5273 10546 2636 5841 RT I 9.36 9.86 8.86 9.38 IS2(NPT) AREA $ 23091 46182 11546 22850 RT # 13.05 13.55 12.55 13.06 IS3 (ANT) AREA # 17639 35278 8820 17478 RT f 18.48 18.98 17.98 18.48 (DCB) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (NPT) = Naphthalene-d8 (ANT) = Acenaphthene-dlO AREA UPPER LIMIT - + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT =* - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. » Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. I J ^>_*•• J J FORM VIII SV-1 0141 3/90 J 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: __________ SAS No. : ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard) : B9714_____ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/04/93 Time Analyzed: 0914___ J J 01 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. SBLK03 IS4(PHN) AREA # 31741 63482 15870 31944 RT * 23.12 23.62 22.62 23.13 IS5(CRY) AREA * 35868 71736 17934 41510 RT # 31.47 31.97 30.97 31.46 IS6(PRY) AREA | 40113 80226 20056 51103 RT # 35.60 36.10 35.10 35.61 154 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dlO 155 (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 156 (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100* of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50* of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT - +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J J J FORM VIII SV-2 0142 3/90 1 n 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): B9731_____ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Time Analyzed: 0829___ 3 e 01 02 03 04 05 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB2-4 5 HB3-3 0 HB4-2 5 HB6-1 5 HB7-1 25 IS4 (PHN) AREA # 37392 74784 18696 52730 58730 56333 58392 59817 RT f 23.14 23.64 22.64 23.15 23.15 23.15 23.16 23.14 ISS(CRY) AREA f 43202 86404 21601 45258 63525 50168 45933 69547 RT I 31.50 32.00 31.00 31.56 31.51 31.54 31.58 31.50 IS6(PRY) AREA # 46052 92104 23026 52501 63137 54504 43145 66882 RT f 35.63 36.13 35.13 35.69 35.66 35.67 35.74 35.64 154 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dlO 155 (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 156 (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT - + 100* of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50t of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. 1 »—^ J J FORM VIII SV-2 0 1 4 3 3/90 8B SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): B9731_____ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/05/93 Time Analyzed: 0829___ o 01 02 03 04 05 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB2-4 5 HB3-3 0 HB4-2 5 HB6-1 5 HB7-1 25 ISl(DCB) AREA $ 6629 13258 3314 10896 10969 11216 12176 11499 RT * 9.38 9.88 8.88 9.38 9.40 9.38 9.40 9.39 IS2 (NPT) AREA | 27288 54576 13644 39597 39125 42488 44321 41664 RT # 13.07 13.57 12.57 13.06 13.08 13.07 13.09 13.07 IS3 (ANT) AREA f 21035 42070 10518 30372 30771 31573 33866 31436 RT f 18.50 19.00 18.00 18.50 18.51 18.50 18.52 18.50 151 (DCB) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 152 (NPT) - Naphthalene-dS 153 (ANT) = Acenaphthene-dlO AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. $ Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. FORM VIII SV-1 0144 3/90 J 8B SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ Contract: __________ SAS No.: ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): B9746_____ Instrument ID: HP-SI SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/06/93 Time Analyzed: 0909___ 01 02 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB8-2 ISl(DCB) AREA * 8701 17402 4350 11003 13061 . RT * 9.38 9.88 8.88 9.39 9.41 IS2 (NPT) AREA # 34657 69314 17328 36957 46516 RT 1 13.08 13.58 12.58 13.07 13.08 IS3(ANT) AREA i 25994 51988 12997 28760 36466 RT # 18.50 19.00 18.00 18.51 18.51 151 (DCS) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 152 (NPT) = Naphthalene-d8 153 (ANT) = Acenaphthene-dlO AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes' of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. FORM VIII SV-1 3/90 1 J J J 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: Lab C Lab F Instri 01 02 ISA ISE IS£ ode: EEAST ile ID (Stand ument ID: HP-. Case No. : ard) : B9746 51 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB10-S HB8-2 IS4(PHN) AREA * 46794 93588 23397 53641 71284 28187 RT * 23.15 23.65 22.65 23.15 23.16 SAS No. : IS5(CRY) AREA # 51157 102314 25578 54660 74857 SDG No. : Date AJ Time AJ RT 1 31.51 32.01 31.01 31.51 31.53 nalyzed: 05/06/9:3 lalyzed: 0909 IS6(PRY) AREA $ 54024 108048 27012 35079 58110 RT S 35.65 36.15 35.15 35.65 35.67 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dl 0 > (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 > (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100* of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT » - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes' of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. 1 J J FORM VIII SV-2 0146 3/90 J J J 8B SEMIVOIATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST___________ Contract: Lab C Lab F Instn 01 ode: EEAST ile ID (Stand jment ID: HP-. Case No. : ard) : H5384 56 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. TREATEDJTAP ISl(DCB) AREA * 540972 1081944 270486 598913 28187 SAS No.: SDG No.: RT I 10.37 10.87 9.87 10.37 Date AJ Time AJ IS2 (NPT) AREA $ 2365285 4730570 1182642 2510947 RT # 14.12 14.62 13.62 14.10 lalyzed: £4/24/93 lalyzed: 0704 IS3(ANT) AREA I 1431785 2863570 715892 1543664 RT | 19.62 20.12 19.12 19.61 151 (DCB) « l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 152 (NPT) = Naphthalene-dS 153 (ANT) * Acenaphthene-dIO AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. $ Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J J 0147 J J FORM VIII SV-1 3/90 1 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No. : ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard) : H5384_____ Instrument ID: HP-S6 SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 04/24/93 Time Analyzed: 0704___ .] J J J J J 0, 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. TREATED TAP IS4(PHN) AREA 2533360 5066720 1266680 2631195 RT I S — — J- 1 24.32 24.82 23.82 24.31 ISS(CRY) AREA f — in i. im*^l^S3SS^~-^ -». 2607767 5215534 1303884 3183022 RT f _^ILJ-___- 32.75 33.25 32.25 32.72 IS6(PRY) AREA I 3620244 7240488 1810122 3826446 RT 36.89 37.39 36.39 36.89 154 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dlO 155 (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 156 (PRY) - Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT - - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. • ' 3 Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. J 0148 FORM VIII SV-2 3/90 8B SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: _________ SAS No. : ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): H5403_____ Instrument ID: HP-56 SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 04/25/93 Time Analyzed: 1121 .1 J J J J J J J 01 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. SBLK02 ISl(DCB) AREA # 794213 1588426 397106 824631 RT f 10.37 10.87 9.87 10.37 IS2(NPT) AREA f 3310486 6620972 1655243 3402121 RT 1 14.12 14.62 13.62 14.12 IS3(ANT) AREA | 2195832 4391664 1097916 2279115 RT f 19.62 20.12 19.12 19.63 151 (DCB) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 152 (NPT) - Naphthalene-d8 153 (ANT) = Acenaphthene-dlO AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. 0149 J J FORM VIII SV-1 3/90 * ~] J 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: Lab C Lab F Instn 01 IS4 ISS IS6 ode: EEAST ile ID (Stand, ument ID: HP-.' Case No. : ardl : H5403 56 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. SBLK02 IS4(PHN) AREA $ 3941418 7882836 1970709 4081400 28187 SAS NO.: SDG No.: RT I 24.33 24.83 23.83 24.33 Date AJ Time AJ ISS (CRY) AREA I 4532705 9065410 2266352 5173104 RT f 32.75 33.25 32.25 32.73 lalyzed: 04/25/93 lalyzed: 112J. IS6(PRY) AREA | 6168898 12337796 3084449 6560722 RT * 36.90 37.40 36.40 36.89 (PHN) * Phenanthrene-dlO (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50* of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. I Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. FORM VIII SV-2 3/90 J SB SEMIUOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD APEA SUMMARY Name: ENSECO EAST Lab Code:________ Case No:. Con tract: 5AS no: SDG no: D 0 J Lab F i l e ID (Standard): >P2689::D5 Instrument ID: HP-52 Date Analyzed: GS-'16,' Time Analyzed: 10:17 12 Hour Std UPPER LIMIT LGUER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO SMB-13MAY93LJ SMS-13MAY93UJ SSD-13MAY93U 28187-09-SA IS1CDCB) AREA # 10119 20238 5060 8656 9251 8168 9622 PT 9.99 10.00 10.02 9.99 10.02 IS2CNPT) AREA * 39295 78590 19648 32300 34653- 31315 35592 RT 13.72 13.71 13.74 13.71 13. 74 IS3l*NT> AREA # 24400 48800 12200 21243 22453 20513 23815 RT 19. 19 ...... 19.19 19.22 19. 19 19.22 1 151 CDCB) - 1,4-DichIorobenzene-d4 ' 152 (NPT) - Naphthalene-d8 153 (ANT) - Acenaphthene-d8 UPPER LIMIT - -100* of internal standard area LOUER LIMIT - -50* of internal standard area. Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk Page 1 of FORM UIII SU-1 1-87 Rev. 0151 •^—^ J J SEMIUOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA SUnnARY ] Lab Name: ENSECO EAST Lab Code:_________ Case No: Cont rac t :. no: SDG no: Lab r i l e ID (Standard): >P2b39::D5 Instrument ID: HP-S2 Date Analyzed: 05-'14.'93 Time A n a l z e d : 10:17 12 Hour Std UPPER LIMIT 1 LOUER LIMIT 1 EPA SAMPLE 1 NO 1 ISMB-13MAY93UI 2 ISMS-13MAY93UJ 3 ISSD-13MAY93U 4128187-09-SA IS4CPHN) AREA £ 43769 37536 21884 34708 37542 33095 38319 RT 23.87 23.86 23.91 23. .87 23.91 IS5CCRY) AREA $ 41191 82382 20596 37068 39703 33818 31340 RT 32.26 32.23 32.27 32.23 32.34 IS4 (PHN) - Phenanthrene-dlO UPPER L IS5 (CRY) - Chrysene-dl2 interns IS6 (PRY) - Perylene-dl2 LOUER L in t erna ' I So C PRY ) AREA tf 51090 102180 25545 40683 43539 36529 32062 RT ...... 3 6 . 42 36.39 36.44 36.40 36.52 MIT - -IOCS of standard area. MIT - -50* of s t andard area . C o l u m n used to f l a g i n t e r n a l standard area values w i t h an a s t e r i s k Paqe 2 of FORM UIII SU-2 1-87 Rev. J O J 5 2 8B SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST____________ Contract: __________ SAS No.: ______ 1 Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): F2704_____ Instrument ID: HP-54 SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Time Analyzed: 0921 01 02 03 IS1 IS2 IS3 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB5-2 3 HB5-2 3DL SBLK04 ISl(DCB) AREA * 9609 19218 4804 12078 8004 10021 RT * 11.07 11.57 10.57 11.07 11.07 11.07 IS2(NPT) AREA f 34542 69084 17271 41042 28260 34218 RT 1 14.87 15.37 14.37 14.86 14.86 14.85 IS3(ANT) AREA f 22659 45318 11330 26901 20023 23908 RT 2 20.42 20.92 19.92 20.40 20.40 20.40 (DCB) = l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (NPT) - Naphthalene-da (ANT) = Acenaphthene -d 10 AREA UPPER LIMIT - -f- 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes'of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. # Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. 3 FORM VIII SV-1 0153 3/90 j 8C SEMIVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA AND RT SUMMARY Lab Name: ENSECO-EAST_____________ Contract: __________ SAS No. : ______ Lab Code: EEAST Case No.: 28187 Lab File ID (Standard): F2704_____ Instrument ID: HP-S4 SDG No.: Date Analyzed: 05/21/93 Time Analyzed: 0921 01 02 03 12 HOUR STD UPPER LIMIT LOWER LIMIT EPA SAMPLE NO. HB5-2 3 HB5-2 3DL SBLK04 IS4(PHN) AREA * 41325 82650 20662 40075 35487 43315 RT f 25.17 25.67 24.66 25.17 25.15 25.15 ISS(CRY) AREA | 42494 84988 21247 15990 * 35590 47957 RT f 33.64 34.14 33.14 33.73 33.61 33.60 IS6(PRY) AREA | 55789 111578 27894 20753 * 42723 37225 RT | 37.82 38.32 37.32 37.97 37.82 37.79 154 (PHN) = Phenanthrene-dlO 155 (CRY) = Chrysene-dl2 156 (PRY) = Perylene-dl2 AREA UPPER LIMIT. = + 100% of internal standard area. AREA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of internal standard area. RT UPPER LIMIT = +0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. RT LOWER LIMIT = -0.50 minutes of internal standard RT. £ Column used to flag internal standard area values with an asterisk. * Values outside of QC limits. FORM VIII SV-2 O J 5 4 3/90 1 ————————————————————————————"———— ; Enseco Total Petroleuia Hydrocarbons by IR "c—>c— 1 n i i j j Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB2-4.5 Lab ID: 028187-0001-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 670 mg/kg 120 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 1 Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:5 dilution. Percent Moisture is 18%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. t ND - Not detected NA = Not applicable n i r r. Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR 1 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-3.0 a o 1 •^ J J "1 Lab ID: 028187-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 16 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed J Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date "1 Total Petroleum J Hydrocarbons NO mg/kg 27 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. % NO - Not detected NA = Not applicable 0156 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno . I 1 1 .] j j ———————————————————————— ..: Ensec Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB4-2.5 Lab ID: 028187-0003-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 200 mg/kg 25 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. NO - Not detected NA = Not applicable 01 Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno ——————————————————————— J Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB5-2.3 Lab ID: 028187-0004-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1800 mg/kg 610 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 1 I Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:25 dilution. Percent Moisture is 19%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. m ;::| ND = Not detected J NA - Not applicable 01 j Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno 1 j .1 j Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB6-1.5 1 Lab ID: 028187-0005-SA 1 Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 170 mg/kg 23 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 j Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. * , :1 ND « Not detected J NA = Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno ] J 7 j ———————————————————————— "'jEnseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR AC—KComD"< Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB7-1.25 Lab ID: 028187-0006-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 67 mg/kg 24 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 j Percent Moisture is 15%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. :] ND =• Not detected J NA = Not applicable | Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR AC"~"*c" Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB8-2 Lab ID: 028187-0007-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 24 rng/kg 24 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 Percent Moisture is 15%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno 01 j ——————————————————————————————————— . Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR AO-^C-^ 1 _^ Client Name: Cooper Environmental -, Client ID: HB10-S Lab ID: 028187-0008-SA I Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed J Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date ~| Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 73 mg/kg 24 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 J j J J Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. \ NO - Not detected ill NA = Not applicable oiee i Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno J J J 1 -.—-•'1 0 0 ... cnsec Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR A° — ;C Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L OIL LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0009-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Result Units Limit Method Date Date 1200000 mg/kg 1000000 3550/418.1 Mod. 03 MAY 93 04 MAY 9: j Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:1000 dilution. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: David Hricko 016 Approved By: Joe Dininno j J i ————————————————————————————————— ';Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR AC—"Com°"" 1 •—' Client Name: Cooper Environmental "I Client ID: TREATED TAP Lab ID: 028187-0010-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 18 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below j Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date I Total Petroleum J Hydrocarbons ND mg/L 0.50 418.1 22 APR 93 23 APR 93 J J J J j J ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Q 1 6 A Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Neil Costanza .] J :r J J J J J ^Enseco Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR AC—*c—" Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: HB3-L WATER LAYER Lab ID: 028187-0011-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 17 APR 93 Received: 20 APR 93 Authorized: 20 APR 93 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1900 mg/L 250 418.1 28 APR 93 29 APR 93 IR Note 1 : All results taken from a 1:100 dilution. Note R : Reporting limit changed due to, sample volume limitations. NO - Not detected NA - Not applicab Reported By: Richard Bozenbury Approved By: Joe Dininno n t NA - Not applicable UJ APPENDIX IV Laboratory Results July 1 through 5, 1993 Sampling Event Ense<:o East Enseco A Coming Company J Summary Result Package for Cooper Environmental Enseco-East Project No. 029182 J I] Fnseco Incorporated iriK) Cottontail Lane f-omt-rset. \'J 08H73-1252 -^8/469-5800 Fax: 908/469-7516 ——-————————————————————————————————— "^Enseco "I--. A Coming Company Table of Contents 1. Sample Description Information 2. Volatile Organic Datasheets a. Analysis Datasheet b. DCS - Duplicate Control Sample c. Method Blank 3. Semi volatile Organic Datasheets a. Analysis Datasheet b. DCS - Duplicate Control Sample c. Method Blank Appendix Jl J] J] J] J.J Ensecc A Comingt Com SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION for Cooper Environmental Lab ID Client ID Sampled Received Matrix Date Time Date 1 029182-0001-SA j 029182-0002-SA 029182-0003-SA T 029182-0004-SA 029182-0005-SA J 029182-0006-SA 029182-0007-SA *3 029182-0008-SA j 029182-0009-SA 029182-0010-SA 029182-0011-SA 1 029182-0012-SA J 029182-0013-FB 1 SAMPLE 1 " SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3 SAMPLE 4 SB-1 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB- 12 FIELD BLANK WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL AQUEOUS 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 10 10 11 12 :20 :45 :10 :20 08:50 09 10 11 13 13 13 14 11 :55 :40 :05 :15 :00 :53 :10 :50 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 J] 1 1 ^*-s JJ jj 0001 I] 1] J JJ j] M JJ JJ TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Enseco A Coming Compji Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SAMPLE 1 029182-0001-SA WASTE 06 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Di chloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 77 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 29 ND ND ND ND ND 99 1600 ND 310 ND 2200 Recovery 91 88 94 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 Reporting Units Limit mg/kg 50 u mg/kg 50 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 50 D mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 25 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) Approved By: Neil Costanza 0002 J ——————————————————————————————————— -. Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) A"—*c—nv Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 1 Lab ID: 029182-0001-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 J J _j Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note D : Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution. ND = Not detected f\f\ fH NA = Not applicable UUU Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza fl J] 11 II TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Enscco A Coming Comp. Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SAMPLE 2 029182-0002-SA WASTE 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Di chloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Tri chloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result Units ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 180 mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 39 mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 260 mg/kg 1600 mg/kg ND mg/kg 260 mg/kg ND mg/kg 1800 mg/kg Recovery 95 % 96 % 96 % Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 Reporting Limit 100 u 100 100 100 50 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 100 50 50 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 J 50 50 100 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) Approved By: Neil Costanza 0004 J] J 1 I] J] —————————————————————————————————— Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) AC—fCampm Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 2 Lab ID: 029182-0002-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable 0005 "«*——^ I I Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza J ! J! 1] '1 J;3 Ji Ji J3 J j JJ Jl JJ Jj TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 3 Lab ID: 029182-0003-SA Matrix: WASTE Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Parameter Chl oromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chl oroethane Methyl ene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1 , 2-Di chl oroethane 2-Butanone 1,1, 1-Tri chl oroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chl oromethane 1 , 2-Di chl oropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochl oromethane 1,1, 2-Tri chl oroethane Benzene trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl -2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2, 2-Tetrachl oroethane Tetrachl oroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof 1 uorobenzene Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 , Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND . 410 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 40 ND ND ND ND ND 210 1100 ND 160 ND 1000 Recovery 95 92 96 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % Received: 03 JUL Analyzed: 13 JUL Reporting Limit 50 50 50 50 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 25 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 50 25 25 50 25 25 25 25 93 93 u D Enseco A Coming Cnmp* ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) Approved By: Neil Costanza 0006 J] Jj JJ A Co 1 ——:———————————————————————————————— '~, Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) *1 Method 8240 "T Client Name: Cooper Environmental M Client ID: SAMPLE 3 -U Lab ID: 029182-0003-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 >, Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes. Note D : Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution. 0007 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza n Ti .13 J] TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 _ Enseco omptr Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SAMPLE 4 029182-0004-SA WASTE 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result Units ND nig/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 370 mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 79 mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 160 mg/kg 1600 mg/kg ND mg/kg 320 mg/kg ND mg/kg 2200 mg/kg Recovery 93 % 91 % 93 % Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 Reporting Limit 50 u 50 50 50 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 25 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 50 25 25 50 D 25 25 25 25 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 0008 Approved By: Neil Costanza J 13 --—————-————-—-—————————^—————————— - Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) ACom"":Comp> " Method 8240 ^c Client Name: Cooper Environmental fl Client ID: SAMPLE 4 U Lab ID: 029182-0004-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 h Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 13 JUL 93 Analyzed: 13 JUL 93 J I j] Note u : All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target ':i analytes. •" Note D : Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution. j ND = Not detected 1 NA = Not applicable J Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza 00 OS TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Enseco A Coming Compd Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-1 029182-0005-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 09 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Di chlpropropane ci s-1,3-Di chloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result NO NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 112 123 74 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA « Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 11 11 11 11 5.4 11 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 11 5.4 5.4 11 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 11 11 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Approved By: Neil Costanza 0010 JJ J] 1 J TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-1 Lab ID: 029182-0005-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 09 JUL 93 Enseco A Coming Co»r>f Percent Moisture is 8.1%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note v : Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as verified by reanalysis. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza 001 1] 1 Jl TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Enseco A Cominft Com p. Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-3 029182-0006-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Di chloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chloromethane 1,2-Di chloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1,2-Di chloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 106 105 89 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ' ND - Not detected ^_^ NA = Not applicable I I Reported By: Salman Qazi JJ (continued on following page) 13 13 13 13 6.3 13 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 13 6.3 6.3 13 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 13 13 6.3 6. 6. 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 .3 .3 Approved By: Neil Costanza 0012 1 1:3 JJ l;j ——————————-———————————————————————— Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-3 Lab ID: 029182-0006-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. | ) ND = Not detected 1 J NA - Not applicable ^ . Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza JJ 001 JJ 3 1 J] JJ J TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-4 029182-0007-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 09 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Tri chloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 117 102 89 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 12 12 12 12 5.8 12 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 12 5.8 5.8 12 .8 .8 .8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 12 12 ,8 .8 .8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Approved By: Neil Costanza 0014 TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) * Method 8240 "^r Client Name: Cooper Environmental m Client ID: SB-4 JJ Lab ID: 029182-0007-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 09 JUL 93 1 11 IS J] J.J Jj r*hnseco Percent Moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ) ND = Not detected I NA = Not applicable 0015 Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza Jl J] 1] Ji i TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Ensecc A Coming Com; Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-5 029182-0008-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Di chloropropane ci s-1,3-Di chloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND . ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 102 103 95 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 12 12 12 12 6.2 12 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 12 6.2 6.2 12 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 12 12 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Approved By: Neil Costanza 0016 j I JJ i] TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) fa} Method 8240 Enscco A Commit Ct>mp Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-5 Lab ID: 029182-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 J! Percent Moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. | i ND = Not detected I NA » Not applicable i ? Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza .) I 00 II D U 1] li TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Enseco A Curmnft Cump Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-9 029182-0009-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Result Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Di chloropropane ci s-1,3-Di chloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene ND ND ND ND 2.3 160 ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 107 105 90 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit 12 12 12 12 6.0 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12 6.0 6.0 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) Approved By: Neil Costanza 0018 U TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) * Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-9 Lab ID: 029182-0009-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 0 J] 'I Enseco Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable "• —j '? Reported By: Sal man Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza ;\ jj ]] 1 I] Jj JJ JJ JJ TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 Ensecc A Coming Com) Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-10 029182-0010-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodi chloromethane 1,2-Di chloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 109 106 93 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 12 12 12 12 6 12 6.1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 6.1 12 6.1 6.1 12 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6 6 6 6 6.1 12 12 6.1 6.1 6 6 6 6 6.1 Approved By: Neil Costanza 0020 TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8240 \ Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-10 Lab ID: 029182-0010-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 * Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Jj Enseco Percent Moisture is 18%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. 1 ) ND = Not detected ' NA = Not applicable ^—s I i Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza 0021 ji ,H 30 ro ro OL HI «J 3 a>3 -O at Nl II II z z o o oj a. •a ro •o r* —' ro — o o rt- tu ro cr a. CO i o • co —'ro -i c i o ro o 3 3 --• o ro o -h I 3- -'CX —' c co o o ooc-J o to fu ro xoomo —I —1>—'roj»cort-DOt—*a —lo •—• •< r-t-<-»• 3" O rt> - I I 1 -J fT> •• -<• 1 -"•- —>l< 3" —i —> <-t-»—• :n 3 o w 3 *—• cr -•• i/i ro (t> -5 << o c -j <• r o r o 3 3 N - - j n i i s r o — ' - j r o « u r o x r i - o t o r o r o o 3 " t — - o ro 3 cr o 3 a - eu 3- -h i 3 i 3 —'- -*• ( / > r o r o c r r o 3 - r o 3 l < o ' — ' r o — H o o o o o -5Ocr ro3 M ro3 ro o ror* 3" ft)3 roia. 3 ro N 3 ro M 3 ro ro 3 ro i o o —I 3 i 3 -j ro ro ro o r» i ro -i -o «-»• &> ro 3-0 3 ro 3- r* 3 —• ID ro o 3 -t o o 3 ro ro toio o 3- -I O 1 -•• 3- O O —' o —' ro -•• o -'-j 3- 3-0 o o ro —'-a -i 3 3 o -j o ro ro -j o ro tu3 ro o •a o •aro3 ro T 3 « U 3 - ft) 3 3 ro ro o ro x>ro3 ro co < o i—• ro i—« o i—• i—• >-• o 3> 3C o < co o -I -j. ju <• I -. 3- - - • » a » o r o 3 - - ' ' - S 3 ' o 3 T •—• co ro —• ro *-• i—• -t ro r* — > 3 o —• 3 •< cr- cio i i i cr c-»- 3- o *< 3 o o —<oi-'n-o-j'->aooo o>< -j —>o -i Q. 3 I O> -J. O O -•• -•• -•• 3 3 —' O 3O -••3> —oo-h-'-ono r o r o r o o r o 3 nnrl--J03-Ot/»3-3-3-O. 3r»-3-«-»-ro 3-roro-j.3 —• i •»*. —' —' —' ->• ro3- —'3-r-t- -T-»-«-t-nroo3r-t-oooi/> «uo«x>3- O W - 1 3 - - J - t - J - J - J C O 3 - J 3 W -Jr*-B» —« O W O O O — J ^r m -*• (0 Z3 o ro o o ro 3 ro ro ro -+i —• ex ro 3 3"1 H- v> r* «-f r»- -*• O fl) ro —'o 3- —•3-3-3-0. -j r+ oro ft) r o c v r o r o -•• -I «-!• 3 333 CX ro ro ro ro ro cu-t a>3 ro r*- ro-t c 01 w —> CLft) ro 3ro •a •a ro o_ CO ro o o cu3 no3 3 C roo, o3 O _j> 3 id ro us o •— • ro to o no ro zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz oooooaooaaooooooooooooaao ooooooooo 33 roI/)c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to vo '*-* to to to to to to to 1O (O IO (O 03 10 VO <ri 1O tnontnontntntnrorotntntntntntntntntnrotntnroontniTi CO CO OO 00 CO CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 CO wioninroonrorororo • « • • CO CO CO CO • ro torr 70 mo •. o-t to zo 3>ro to oo 3 ro w o —'ID «< -«. N < ro ro a. a. ro u> ro oa. CO ro o OJ ro O to tu3 _Jt O t/l O O ro ro to to oo oo J J J ——————————————————————————————————— Enseco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) ACO™,C^ Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-11 Lab ID: 029182-0011-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. / ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable "^ Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza _ 0023 11 ]) TCL Volatile Organics Method 8240 - Enseco A Coming Compj Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-12 029182-0012-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Tri chloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachlorqethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 107 103 90 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi (continued on following page) 6. 6. 12 12 12 12 6.0 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12 .0 .0 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12 12 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Approved By: Neil Costanza 0024 J J! n JJ •* ———'——————'——————————————————————"— Enscco TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) 'j Method 8240 X. Client Name: Cooper Environmental 1) Client ID: SB-12 •II Lab ID: 029182-0012-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 y* Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 12 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. I ') ND = Not detected 1 j NA = Not applicable Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Neil Costanza 0025 1 if ™ : JJ l! JJ I Jj TCL Volatil Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: FIELD BLANK Lab ID: 029182-0013-FB Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared Parameter Chl oromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methyl ene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Di chl oroethane 2-Butanone 1 , 1 , 1-Tri chl oroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromod i chl oromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochl oromethane 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane Benzene cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2, 2-Tetrachl oroethane Tetrachl oroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene-d8 4-Bromof 1 uorobenzene 1 , 2-Di chl oroethane-d4 e Organics 8240 : 02 JUL 93 : NA , Result ND NO ND ND ND 4.7 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 110 105 107 Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L % % % Received: 03 JUL Analyzed: 07 JUL Reporting Limit 10 10 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 93 93 J Enseco A Coming Cump ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) l Reported By: Jyoti Kumar Approved By: Neil Costanza 0026 u ——————————————-———————————————————- Enseco A Cominc Come TCL Volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8240 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: FIELD BLANK Lab ID: 029182-0013-FB Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: NA Analyzed: 07 JUL 93 l! JJ Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Jyoti Kumar Approved By: Neil Costanza 0027 QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS Enseco A Corning Cocnpai Laboratory Sample Number II 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- •0001-SA •0002-SA •0003-SA •0004-SA •0005-SA •0006-SA •0007-SA •0008-SA 0009-SA 0010-SA 0011-SA 0012-SA 0013-FB QC Matrix WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID AQUEOUS QC Category 8240-W 8240-W 8240-W 8240-W 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-SL 8240-AQ QC Lot Number (DCS) QC Run Number (SCS/BLANK) 13 JUL 93-S 13 JUL 93-S 13 JUL 93-S 13 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 09 JUL 93-S 02 JUL 93-A 13 JUL 93-A 13 JUL 93-A 13 JUL 93-A 13 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 12 JUL 93-A 07 JUL 93-A II jj 0028 V-, SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS Enseco A Coming Comf^ Analyte Concentration Spiked Measured Accuracy(%) SCS Limits Category: 8240-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 13 JUL 93-S QC Run: Concentration Units: mg/kg 1,2-Di chloroethane-d4 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Toluene-d8 13 JUL 93-A 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.19 5.11 5.27 104 70-121 102 74-121 105 81-117 Category: 8240-SL Matrix: SOLID QC Lot: 09 JUL 93-S QC Run: Concentration Units: UG/KG 1,2-Dich1oroethane-d4 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Toluene-d8 09 JUL 93-A 50.0 50.0 50.0 54.1 52.6 52.1 108 70-121 105 74-121 104 81-117 I 1 Category: 8240-SL Matrix: SOLID QC Lot: 09 JUL 93-S QC Run: Concentration Units: UG/KG 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Toluene-d8 Category: 8240-AQ Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 02 JUL 93-A QC Run: Concentration Units: ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 4-Bromof1uorobenzene Toluene-d8 12 JUL 93-A 50.0 50.0 50.0 07 JUL 93-A 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.9 48.8 51.1 50.7 51.0 53.4 102 70-121 98 74-121 102 81-117 101 76-114 102 86-115 107 88-110 Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated result! JJ JJ 0029 METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/HS Analyte Result Units Reporting Limit Test: 8240-TCL-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 13 JUL 93-S QC Run: 13 JUL 93-A j j Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Tri chloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Di chlpropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 10 10 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.0 1 I j; J ! 0030 METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) Enseco A Coming Comp Analyte Result Units Reporting Limit Test: 8240-TCL-L-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 09 JUL 93-S QC Run: 09 JUL 93-A Jl 8 J3 [I Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Tri chloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 10 10 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 .0 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 5. Jl JJ 0031 H METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Orgam'cs by GC/MS (cont.) Ij Analyte Result Units Reporting Limit Test: 8240-TCL-L-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 09 JUL 93-S QC Run: 12 JUL 93-A Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (cis/trans) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Di chloropropane ci s-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Di bromochloromethane 1,1,2-Tri chloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene Xylenes (total) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 10 10 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.0 10 10 5.0 0 0 0 0 5.0 5.0 JJ 0032 Enseco J METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) Reporting Analyte Result Units Limit Test: 8240-TCL-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 02 JUL 93-A QC Run: 07 JUL 93-A Chloromethane ND ug/L 10 Bromomethane ND ug/L 10 Vinyl Chloride ND ug/L 10 Chloroethane ND ug/L 10 Methylene chloride 1.1 ug/L 5.0 Acetone ND ug/L 10 Carbon disulfide ND ug/L 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 5.0 1.1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 5.0 1.2-Di chloroethene (cis/trans) ND ug/L 5.0 Chloroform ND ug/L 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 5.0 2-Butanone ND ug/L 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 5.0 Vinyl Acetate ND ug/L 10 Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 5.0 Trichloroethene ND ug/L 5.0 Dibromochloromethane ND ug/L 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 5.0 Benzene ND ug/L 5.0 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 5.0 Bromoform ND ug/L 5.0 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND ug/L 10 2-Hexanone ND ug/L 10 :; 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 5.0 ;J Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 5.0 Toluene ND ug/L 5.0 j Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 5.0 :| Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 5.0 Styrene ND ug/L 5.0 Xylenes (total) ND ug/L 5.0 J = Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an -:? estimated concentration. I ! J-' 0033 jj n n Jl TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 1 Lab ID: 029182-0001-SA Matrix: WASTE Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Parameter Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 , 4-Di chl orobenzene Benzyl alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methyl phenol bi s (2-Chl oroi sopropyl ) ether 4-Methyl phenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol Benzoic acid bi s (2-Chl oroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1, 2, 4-Tri chl orobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol 2-Methyl naphtha! ene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4, 6-Tr i chl orophenol 2,4, 5-Tri chl orophenol 2-Chl oronaphthal ene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Sampled: 02 JUL Prepared: 21 JUL . Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 840 ND ND ND 850 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND (continued on following 93 93 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg page) Received: 03 JUL Analyzed: 23 JUL Reporting Limit 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 2400 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 2400 480 2400 480 480 2400 480 2400 2400 480 93 93 d Enseco A Cornin Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0034 JJ JJ TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 1 Lab ID: 029182-0001-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Parameter 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Di ethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Ni trosodi phenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo( a) anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz( a, h) anthracene Benzo (g , h , i ) peryl ene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobi phenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol -d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol , Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 150 ND ND 59 130 ND ND 80 130 69 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 56 88 109 65 73 35 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % Reporting Limit 480 480 480 480 480 2400 2400 480 480 480 2400 480 480 480 480 480 480 950 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 J J J J J J Enseco A Coming Compj ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0035 iJ 13 ——————— Ensecc ics (CONT.) Method 8270 TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) AC—*COB" Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 1 Lab ID: 029182-0001-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 j] 1 Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0036 J Ensecc A Coming Com l] JJ JJ TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 2 Lab ID: 029182-0002-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Phenol ND mg/kg 480 d bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND mg/kg 480 2-Chl orophenol ND mg/kg 480 1.3-Dichl orobenzene ND mg/kg 480 1.4-Dichl orobenzene ND mg/kg 480 Benzyl alcohol ND mg/kg 480 1,2-Dichl orobenzene ND mg/kg 480 2-Methyl phenol ND mg/kg 480 bis(2-Ch1oroisopropyl) ether ND mg/kg 480 4-Methyl phenol ND mg/kg 480 N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine ND mg/kg 480 Hexachloroethane ND mg/kg 480 Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 480 Isophorone ND mg/kg 480 2-Nitrophenol ND mg/kg 480 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND mg/kg 2400 Benzoic acid ND mg/kg 480 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane ND mg/kg 480 2, 4-Dichl | orophenol ND mg/kg 480 1, 2, 4-Trichl orobenzene ND mg/kg 480 Naphthalene 600 mg/kg 480 4-Chloroaniline ND mg/kg 480 Hexachlorobutadiene ND mg/kg 480 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol ND mg/kg 480 2-Methylnaphthalene 620 mg/kg 480 Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene ND mg/kg 480 2, 4, 6-Trichl orophenol ND mg/kg 480 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND mg/kg 2400 2-Chloronaphthalene ND mg/kg 480 2-Nitroaniline ND mg/kg 2400 Dimethyl phthalate ND mg/kg 480 Acenaphthylene ND mg/kg 480 3-Nitroaniline ND mg/kg 2400 Acenaphthene ND mg/kg 480 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND mg/kg 2400 4-Nitrophenol ND mg/kg 2400 Dibenzofuran ND mg/kg 480 (continued on following page) ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 1 J] **^-^ JJ Jj TCL Semi volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 2 Lab ID: 029182-0002-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Parameter 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Di ethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Ni trosodi phenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachl orobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo (a) anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo (k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz( a, h) anthracene Benzo (g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobi phenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol -d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol J Result ND ND ND ND 110 ND ND ND ND ND ND 230 ND ND 51 98 ND ND 61 170 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 65 95 116 63 54 38 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % Reporting Limit 480 480 480 480 480 2400 2400 480 480 480 2400 480 480 480 480 480 480 950 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 J J J J J J Enseco A Comtn£ Compj ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0038 J ——————-———————————————————————————— Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organics (CONT.) A co™, &»,„ 1 \_ J J I Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 2 Lab ID: 029182-0002-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0039 l I! II TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 3 Lab ID: 029182-0003-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Parameter Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chl orophenol 1 , 3-Di chl orobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl alcohol 1,2-Dichl orobenzene 2-Methyl phenol bis(Z-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methyl phenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol Benzoic acid bis (2-Chl oroethoxy)- me thane 2 , 4-Di chl orophenol 1 , 2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroanil ine Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol 2-Methyl naphthal ene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2, 4, 6-Tri chl orophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chl oronaphthal ene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol DibenzDfuran . Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 390 ND ND ND 450 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Reporting Limit 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 2500 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 2500 490 2500 490 490 2500 490 2500 2500 490 d J J Enseco A Coming Comptn ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 1 U !! TCL Semi volatile Organ ics (CONT.) Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 3 Lab ID: 029182-0003-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: Parameter 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Ni trosodi phenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo( a) anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz( a, h) anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terpheny1-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 8270 02 JUL 93 21 JUL 93 - Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 80 ND ND ND 72 ND ND ND 160 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 50 85 105 59 54 35 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % Received: 03 JUL Analyzed: 23 JUL Reporting Limit 490 490 490 490 490 2500 2500 490 490 490 2500 490 490 490 490 ^ 490 490 990 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 93 93 J J J Enseco A Coming Compx ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0041 ———————————————————————————————— Enseco TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) A^^C°mpJ Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 3 Lab ID: 029182-0003-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. RT" -1 Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. I;' | ND - Not detected NA » Not applicable ,\. Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn . J 0042 1 II !J TCL Semivolatile Organics Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 4 Lab ID: 029182-0004-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared Parameter Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl alcohol 1,2-Di chl orobenzene 2-Methyl phenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl ) ether 4-Methyl phenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol Benzoic acid bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2, 4-Tr i chl orobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chl oro-3-methy 1 phenol 2-Methyl naphthalene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroanil ine Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroanil ine Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 8270 : 02 JUL : 21 JUL Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 710 ND ND ND 790 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 93 93 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Received: 03 Analyzed: 23 Reporting Limit 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 2500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 2500 500 2500 500 500 2500 500 2500 2500 500 JUL 93 JUL 93 d Ensecc A Coming Cufn| (continued on following page) NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0043 J 1 il I n n n TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Enseco A Comtnft Comp* Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter SAMPLE 4 029182-0004-SA WASTE 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline « 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Ni trosodi phenylami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Di chlorobenzidi ne Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)f 1uoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,hjanthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tri bromophenol ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Result Units Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 Reporting Limit ND ND ND ND 57 ND ND ND ND ND ND 150 ND ND 54 130 ND ND 73 170 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 500 500 500 500 500 2500 2500 500 500 500 2500 500 500 500 500 500 500 1000 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Recovery 59 % 92 % 104 % 65 % 45 % 38 % (continued on following page) J J J J | Reported By: Stacey Miller .-. .} Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0044 J J I •—————————————————————————————————— Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organ ics (CONT.) AC—*Ctmp" Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SAMPLE 4 Lab ID: 029182-0004-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 23 JUL 93 J i Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. • 3 |. ;} Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. I ND = Not detected 1 NA - Not applicable ^-f Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn ... ! 0045 J njj oo4 10^ .. .) "3 V———- J j 1 j 1 j TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 Enseco A Coming Com par Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-1 029182-0005-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Result Units Limit Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Di chlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bi s(2-Ch1oroi sopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bi s(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Tri chlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 180 ND ND ND ND ND 530 ND 220 ND ND ND . ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 3500 720 3500 720 720 3500 720 3500 3500 720 720 720 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) dJ J J j Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0048 j ••i^'.S* ,1 J J TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 : Enseco A Coming Comp Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-1 029182-0005-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Ni trosodi phenylami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol Result ND Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg Recovery 81 86 159 83 78 84 720 ND NO NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 180 ND ND ND 110 200 120 170 ND 340 ND ND 1200 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 720 720 3500 3500 720 720 720 3500 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 1400 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0047 ———————————-——^————————-———————- - Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organ ics (CONT.) A a, Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-1 Lab ID: 029182-0005-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. Percent Moisture is 8.1%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0048 1 n I J TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 -:. Enseco A Commft Comp*n Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-3 029182-0006-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 20 JUL 93 Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Di chlorobenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Di chlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bi s (2-Chloroi sopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Tri chlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphtha! ene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Tri chlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Result ND NO NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 20000 4200 20000 4200 4200 20000 4200 20000 20000 4200 4200 4200 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: David Ercoliani Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0049 i! TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Enseco A Coming Comp*: Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter SB-3 029182-0006-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 20 JUL 93 Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Ni trosod i phenylami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tri bromophenol Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 780 ND ND ND 660 790 450 1100 ND 420 ND ND 3400 Recovery 84 80 126 84 80 73 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 4200 4200 4200 20000 20000 4200 4200 4200 20000 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 8300 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 J J J J J ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: David Ercoliani Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0050 ——————-————————————————————————— : Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organics (CONT.) A CorT"n"Canf""- Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-3 Lab ID: 029182-0006-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 20 JUL 93 Note d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. Percent Moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: David Ercoliani Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0051 1I \^m ————————————————————————————————— Enseco . A Coming Cumpj TCL Semi volatile Organics Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-4 Lab ID: 029182-0007-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Phenol ND ug/kg 380 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND ug/kg 380 2-Chlorophenol ND ug/kg 380 1.3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 380 1.4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 380 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 380 2-Methyl phenol ND ug/kg 380 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether ND ug/kg 380 4-Methylphenol ND ug/kg 380 N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine ND ug/kg 380 Hexachloroethane ND ug/kg 380 Nitrobenzene ND ug/kg 380 Isophorone ND ug/kg 380 2-Nitrophenol ND ug/kg 380 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND ug/kg 380 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane ND ug/kg 380 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND ug/kg 380 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 380 Naphthalene ND ug/kg 380 4-Chloroaniline ND ug/kg 380 Hexachlorobutadiene ND ug/kg 380 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND ug/kg 380 2-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/kg 380 Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene ND ug/kg 380 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND ug/kg 380 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND ug/kg 1800 2-Chloronaphthalene ND ug/kg 380 2-Nitroaniline ND ug/kg 1800 Dimethyl phthalate ND ug/kg 380 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg 380 3-Nitroaniline ND ug/kg 1800 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg 380 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ug/kg 1800 4-Nitrophenol ND ug/kg 1800 Dibenzofuran ND ug/kg 380 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND ug/kg 380 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ug/kg 380 (continued on following page) ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable ^ j Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0052 J ! 1 J L! 13 LI TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Enseco A Coming Com pin \ Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-4 029182-0007-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 44 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 75 75 89 73 82 88 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 380 380 380 1800 1800 380 380 380 1800 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 760 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0053 1 1 :i :i A c- —————————————————————————————— i: Enseco TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-4 Lab ID: 029182-0007-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. fr:»"':f i;i; ;J Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an ''~ estimated concentration. 1 1 ND = Not detected , NA = Not applicable 0054 Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn JJ ————————————————————————————————————— .. Enseco TCL Semivolatile Organics ' • ' Method 8270 •^, Client Name: Cooper Environmental 1 Client ID: SB-5 •a Lab ID: 029182-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit I .1 Phenol ND ug/kg 410 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether ND ug/kg 410 2-Chlorophenol ND ug/kg 410 1.3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 410 1.4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 410 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 410 2-Methylphenol ND ug/kg 410 bi s(2-ChIoroi sopropyl) ether ND ug/kg 410 4-Methylphenol ND ug/kg 410 N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine ND ug/kg 410 Hexachloroethane ND ug/kg 410 Nitrobenzene ND ug/kg 410 Isophorone ND ug/kg 410 2-Nitrophenol ND ug/kg 410 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND ug/kg 410 bi s(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane ND ug/kg 410 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND ug/kg 410 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 410 Naphthalene ND ug/kg 410 4-Chloroaniline ND ug/kg 410 Hexachlorobutadiene ND ug/kg 410 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND ug/kg 410 2-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/kg 410 Hexachlorocyclo- -, pentadiene ND ug/kg 410 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND ug/kg 410 »-' 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND ug/kg 2000 2-Chloronaphthalene ND ug/kg 410 I 2-Nitroaniline ND ug/kg 2000 ,.} Dimethyl phthalate ND ug/kg 410 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg 410 3-Nitroaniline ND ug/kg 2000 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg 410 • --I 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ug/kg 2000 4-Nitrophenol ND ug/kg 2000 :;;{ Dibenzofuran ND ug/kg 410 ;i;j 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND ug/kg 410 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ug/kg 410 (continued on following page) 1 ND = Not detected y K a / NA = Not applicable J Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn J I iio TCL Semi volatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 • •- Enseco A Coming Compw Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-5 029182-0008-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Nitrosodipnenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,hjanthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tri bromophenol Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 680 ND ND 100 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 71 78 94 72 77 87 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 410 410 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 2000 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 820 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) 0056 Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn j TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) ' Method 8270 ^ Client Name: Cooper Environmental iiif Client ID: SB-5 >J Lab ID: 029182-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 •TJ Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 I J J rrhnseco A Corning Cocnpo Percent Moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn U U D i •J:*;.:;i LI y u U TCL Semivolatile Organics Method 8270 Enseco A Corning Comp* Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-9 029182-0009-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Result Units Limit Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Di chlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bi s(2-ChIoroi sopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Tri chlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 1900 390 390 1900 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0058 "I .1 ri TCL Semivolatile Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-9 Lab ID: 029182-0009-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared Organics 8270 : 02 JUL : 09 JUL (CONT.) 93 93 Received: 03 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Di ethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Nitrosodi phenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz( a, h) anthracene Benzo(g,h, i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 " 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol Result NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 110 ND ND 48 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 66 74 89 71 75 84 Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg % % % % % % Limit 390 390 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 790 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 J J Enseco A Corning CcKnpa (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0059 J ;J —————— - Enseco TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) ACo'T"nKCamp* Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-9 Lab ID: 029182-0009-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 ~j - 1 Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ::j| | ;;;i Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an ^~~ estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0060 I 1 - J TCL Semi volatile Organ ics Method 8270 Enseco *<:««.,<:*«,-„ Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-10 029182-0010-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 16 JUL 93 . Dry Weight Reporting Result Units Limit Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methyl phenol bi s (2-Ch 1 oroi sopropyl ) ether 4-Methyl phenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachl oroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachl orobutadi ene 4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol 2-Methyl naphthalene Hexachl orocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroani line Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND - Not detected NA = Not applicable ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 2000 400 2000 400 400 2000 400 2000 2000 400 400 400 (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0061 .J L J] TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Enseco A Comtnye Compel Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter SB-10 029182-0010-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Nitrosodipnenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)f1uoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 16 JUL 93 Result NO Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit ug/kg Recovery 48 49 65 49 54 46 400 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1000 ND ND 130 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 400 400 2000 2000 400 400 400 2000 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 810 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0062 J 1 LI ———————————————^—————————————— Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organ ics (CONT.) *<:*«-»<:*»,»« Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-10 Lab ID: 029182-0010-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 16 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 18%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0063 Enseco "v—s J J J J J J J TCL Senrivolatile Organics Method 8270 A Commj Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-11 029182-0011-SA SOIL 06 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Result Units Limit Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Di chlorobenzene 1.4-Di chlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bi s(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphtha!ene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND «*• • ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 1900 380 1900 380 380 1900 380 1900 1900 380 380 380 (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn ND = Not detected NA - Not applicable 0064 -J Lj :j TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-11 Lab ID: 029182-0011-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Dry Weight Parameter Di ethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Ni trosodi pnenyl ami ne 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachl orobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo ( a) anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo (b)fluoranthene Benzo (k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz (a, h) anthracene Benzo (g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol -d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 43 61 140 ND ND 70 ND 49 87 ND ND ND ND 87 Recovery 78 85 124 77 85 90 Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg % % % % %% Reporting Limit 380 380 380 1900 1900 380 380 380 1900 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 770 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 J J J J J J J Enseco A Coming Cotnpj J ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0065 j J ;J ."J J J •—————— - Enseco TCL Semi volatile Organics (CONT.) A Cormn(: Cofnp"" Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-11 Lab ID: 029182-0011-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0066 , j ————————— Enseco •ganics Method 8270 T1/*! f • 1 ± • ^ f\ • * Comme Com p. TCL Sermvolatile Organics "*-" Client Name: Cooper Environmental 1 Client ID: SB-12 --J Lab ID: 029182-0012-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 -i Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 y:J Parameter -.•HI Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether -n 2-Chlorophenol ;; 1,3-Di chl orobenzene - JZJ 1,4-Dichl orobenzene 1 , 2-Di chl orobenzene ;T!j 2-Methyl phenol ,ij| bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methyl phenol ;ij N-Nitroso-di- ' Ui n-propylamine Hexachloroethane ri Nitrobenzene 'o» ill Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol bi s (2-Chl oroethoxy)- .^ methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol ••.« 1,2, 4-Tri chl orobenzene ;| Naphthalene ':J 4-Chloroanil ine Hexachlorobutadiene "1 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol ._, j 2-Methyl naphthalene Hexachl orocycl o- ... pentadiene •1 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol --'-J 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 1 2-Nitroaniline , | Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene - 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene - j -J 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol •' iin Dibenzofuran ^IJ 2,4-Dinitrotoluene "*'" 2,6-Dinitrotoluene - Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND . ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Dry Weight Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg Reporting Limit 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 1900 390 390 1900 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 (continued on following page) ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable j Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0067 _J -, U T J '1 j j rj TCL Semivolatile Method Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-12 Lab ID: 029182-0012-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared Organ ics 8270 : 02 JUL : 09 JUL (CONT.) 93 93 Received: 03 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methyl phenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachl orophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fl uoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz( a, h) anthracene Benzo (g , h , i ) peryl ene Surrogate Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 Phenol-d5 2-Fluorophenol 2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1200 ND ND 91 ND ND 46 ND ND ND ND ND Recovery 73 83 106 74 78 89 Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg %% % % % % Limit 390 390 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 790 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 J J Enseco A Coming Cixnp*r (continued on following page) Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable 0068 X——s I ri n •i ii r ————^—————————————^—————————————— Enseco TCL Semivolatile Organics (CONT.) AC^C— Method 8270 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-12 Lab ID: 029182-0012-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 03 JUL 93 Authorized: 06 JUL 93 Prepared: 09 JUL 93 Analyzed: 14 JUL 93 Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note J : Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. ND = Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stacey Miller Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn 0069 •3 n QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT Semivolatile Orgam'cs by GC/MS :.- Enseco A Coming Comptf Laboratory Sample Number Ll xJ -1 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- 029182- •0001-SA •0002-SA •0003-SA •0004-SA •0005-SA 0006-SA 0007-SA 0008-SA 0009-SA 0010-SA 0011-SA 0012-SA QC Matrix WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL QC Category 8270-W 8270-W 8270-W 8270-W 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S 8270-S QC Lot Number (DCS) J QC Run Number (SCS/BLANK) 21 JUN 93-W 21 JUN 93-W 21 JUN 93-W 21 JUN 93-W 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 08 JUL 93-A 21 JUL 93-W 21 JUL 93-W 21 JUL 93-W 21 JUL 93-W 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 09 JUL 93-A 0070 u SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT Semivolatlle Organics by GC/MS -: Enseco A Coming Compam J J •tJ Analyte Category: 8270-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 21 JUN 93-W QC Run: Concentration Units: mg/kg Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 2-Fluorophenol Phenol-d5 2,4,6-Tri bromophenol Concentration Spiked Measured 21 JUL 93-W 50.0 50.0 50.0 100 100 100 38.1 50.4 49.5 98.1 89.5 58.6 Accuracy(%) SCS Limits 76 101 99 98 90 59 23-120 30-115 18-137 25-121 24-113 19-122 J Category: 8270-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 08 JUL 93-A QC Run: Concentration Units: ug/kg Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4 2-Fluorophenol Phenol-d5 2,4,6-Tri bromophenol 09 JUL 93-A 1670 1670 1670 3330 3330 3330 1340 1320 1490 2530 2590 2060 80 79 89 76 78 62 23-120 30-115 18-137 25-121 24-113 19-122 J Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. J :J 0071 Enseco A O METHOD BLANK REPORT Semivolatile Organics by GC/HS .! ,! J J Analyte Test: 8270-TCL-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 21 JUN 93-W Result Units Reporting Limit QC Run: 21 JUL 93-W Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol Benzoic acid bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Tri chlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphtha!ene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 250 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 250 50 250 50 50 250 50 250 250 50 J 0072 •J Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 rinseco A k.orniny C»wnr**nv Cooper Environmental Sample 2 014751-0002-SA WASTE 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 22 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Result 280000 Recovery 98 Wet Weight Reporting Units Limit mg/kg nig/kg mg/kg See below 290 12000 1 Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to a mixture of kerosene and lubricating oil. This mixture is characteristic of cutting oils, such as WD-40. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Horrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0078 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 Cooper Environmental SB-12 014751-0012-SA SOIL 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Enseco A Coming Cotnpan Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Result 150 Recovery 76 Dry Weight Reporting Units mg/kg ing/kg mg/kg Limit See below 3.0 120 •: . i Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to products in the range of fuel oil SB and lubricating oil. Percent Moisture is 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0089 •s^^^-J .1 J j J ————-—————————————————————-——-—————— Enseco Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting ACommgcomp* Modified ASTM Method D3328 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Field Blank Lab ID: 014751-0013-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 21 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0.062 mg/L See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon -— mg/L 0.010 Total Product —— mg/L 0.50 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 65 % Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample is below the qualification limit. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0090 J 0 Enseco A Lt^minij Comp*nv QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT Hydrocarbons 1 I Laboratory Sample Number 014751-0001-SA 014751-0002-SA 014751-0003-SA 014751-0004-SA 014751-0005-SA 014751-0006-SA 014751-0007-SA 014751-0008-SA 014751-0009-SA 014751-0010-SA 014751-0011-SA 014751-0012-SA 014751-0013-SA QC Matrix QC Category SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL AQUEOUS MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-S MHYD-A 1 1 1 QC Lot Number (DCS) 25 JUN 93-WA 25 JUN 93-WA 25 JUN 93-WA 25 JUN 93-WA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-SHA 12 JUL 93-LA QC Run Number (SCS/BLANK) 20 JUL 93-W1 20 JUL 93-W1 20 JUL 93-W1 20 JUL 93-W1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-SH1 12 JUL 93-L1 'J 0091 "T1 '1 '1 !i1 l ^a t .^ 'I 1 ''•''.] : : j 1 i 1 . .J ' 1 ..] 'J DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT Hydrocarbons Project: 014751 Category: MHYD-S Petroleum Hydrocarbons Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 25 JUN 93-WA Concentration Units: mg/kg ------- ..--.-Concentration------ —— - Analyte Spiked ----------Measured --------- DCS1 DCS2 AVG Fuel Oil n 5930 7250 7160 7200 Category: MHYD-S Petroleum Hydrocarbons Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 12 JUL 93-SHA Concentration Units: mg/kg ..-----.--...Concentration ----------- Analyte Spiked ----------Measured --------- DCS1 DCS2 AVG Fuel Oil #2 32.7 13.7 14.7 14.2 Category: MHYD-A Petroleum Hydrocarbons Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 12 JUL 93-LA Concentration Units: mg/L ..--.--.-----Concentration —— ------ Analyte Spiked --------- -Measured--------- DCS1 DCS2 AVG Fuel Oil #2 0.981 0.640 0.717 0.678 Accuracy Average(%) DCS Limits 122 22-138 Accuracy Average (%) DCS Limits 43 22-138 Accuracy Average(%) DCS Limits 69 55-112 tnseco A Cuming Company Precisioi (RPD) DCS Limil 1.2 6( Precision (RPD) DCS Limi 7.0 6 Precisio (RPD) DCS Limi 11 1 Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results 0092 SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT Hydrocarbons Project: 014751 Category: MHYD-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 25 JUN 93-WA Concentration Units: mg/kg Analyte o-Terphenyl Petroleum Hydrocarbons QC Run: 20 JUL 93-U1 Concentration Spiked Measured 200 162 Accuracy(S) SCS Limits 81 33-123 Category: MHYD-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 12 JUL 93-SHA Concentration Units: mg/kg Analyte o-Terphenyl Petroleum Hydrocarbons QC Run: 12 JUL 93-SH1 Concentration Spiked Measured 1.67 0.825 Accuracy(%) SCS Limits 49 33-123 Category: MHYD-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 12 JUL 93-LA Concentration Units: mg/L Analyte o-Terphenyl Petroleum Hydrocarbons QC Run: 12 JUL 93-L1 Concentration Spiked Measured 0.0500 0.0305 Accuracy(%) SCS Limits 61 49-117 Enseco Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results, 0014 ,..., ni .1 n ———————————————-—-———:—:——————————— nnseco , Hyarocarbon Fingerprinting * com.™c«r,w "I Modified ASTM Method D3328 S-- Client Name: Cooper Environmental !8 Client ID: SB-3 -# Lab ID: 014751-0006-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Vq Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 , Dry Weight Reporting , Parameter Result Units Limit ji!f Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 2000 nig/kg See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon —- mg/kg 2.5 ...., Total Product —— rag/kg 100 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 80 ' ] Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID J characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. :. | Percent Moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND = Not detected > i NA - Not applicable ' Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski Ns~f ' 0083 'I „, ,™ ,„: I i Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 bnseco A Commp Comp^ Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Cooper Environmental SB-4 014751-0007-SA SOIL 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Result 27 Recovery 56 Dry Weight Reporting Units Limit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg See below 0.29 12 1 * -•. •» ••••) Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID ,J characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. ^M Percent Moisture is 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski ;j 0084 1 1 • ;—————~————————————————— iinscco Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Acom,ngc«nt» Modified ASTH Method D3328 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-5 Lab ID: 014751-0008-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 81 nig/kg See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon ---- mgAg 3.1 Total Product —-- mg/kg 120 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 68 % -I Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample is below the qualification limit. i| Percent Moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. —:•/ ND = Not detected I NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski I I 0085 J • ;' Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 Cooper Environmental SB-9 014751 -0009-SA SOIL 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Enseco A Con" nr tumw, Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Result 35 ---- ---- Recovery 61 Dry Weight Reporting Units nig/kg nig/kg mg/kg Limit See below 0.29 11 i y i :"••) Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID , .J characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. r* vt I ijil Percent Moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected • j NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0086 ;::' —————————-——————-—-——————————————— Enseco Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting A 0*™* c.omp» :' Modified ASTM Method D3328 1 1 1 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-10 Lab ID: 014751-0010-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 230 mg/kg See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon —- rag/kg 0.88 Total Product ---- mg/kg 35 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 68 X 1 Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID J characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. |i|[ Percent Moisture 1s 16%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. ND - Not detected : NA - Not applicable f Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski _^< 0087 j ——————————————————————————————————— Enseco Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Acommccumo I 1 Modified ASTM Method D3328 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-11 Lab ID: 014751-0011-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 , Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 230 mg/kg See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon ---- rogAg 2.8 Total Product —— mg/kg HO i Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 68 Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. Percent Moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0088 METHOD BLANK REPORT Semi volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) •_-. Enseco A Commjt Com pa I Analyte Test: 8270-TCL-W Matrix: WASTE QC Lot: 21 JUN 93-W 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a ,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h, i)perylene Result Units Reporting Limit QC Run: 21 JUL 93-W ND ND ND KD ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 50 50 50 50 50 250 250 50 50 50 250 50 50 50 50 50 50 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 11 Test: 8270-TCL-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 08 JUL 93-A QC Run: 09 JUL 93-A Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 330 330 330 0073 El Enseco A Coming Cofnpj METHOD BLANK REPORT Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) Analyte Result Units Reporting Limit Jl J j I! H! Test: 8270-TCL-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 08 JUL 93-A 1.3-Di chlorobenzene 1.4-Di chlorobenzene 1,2-Di chlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso-di- n-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol bis(2-Chloroethoxy)- methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Tri chlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclo- pentadiene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether QC Run: 09 JUL 93-A ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 1600 330 1600 330 330 1600 330 1600 1600 330 330 330 330 330 —-lull-"J J 0074 : U ' Enseco A Coming Compel M :j :J LI y METHOD BLANK REPORT Semi volatile Organics by GC/MS (cent.) Analyte Result Units Reporting Limit Test: 8270-TCL-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 08 JUL 93-A Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene 9H-Carbazole Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Chrysene Di-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene QC Run: 09 JUL 93-A ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 330 1600 1600 330 330 330 1600 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 660 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 .—^ j 0075 r Enseco A Coming Company Lab ID 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 014751- 0001-SA 0002-SA 0003-SA 0004-SA 0005-SA 0006-SA 0007-SA 0008-SA 0009-SA 0010-SA 0011-SA 0012-SA 0013-SA Client ID Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 SB-1 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 Field Blank SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION for Cooper Environmental Sampled Received Matrix Date Time Date WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL AQUEOUS 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 10 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 13 13 13 14 11 :20 :45 :10 :20 :50 :55 :40 :05 :15 :00 :53 :10 :50 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL JUL 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 _\ 0076 1 3 3 .. 'J Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting ^o™*c^ Modified ASTH Method D3328 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Sample 1 Lab ID: 014751-0001-SA Matrix: WASTE Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 22 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Wet Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 300000 mg/kg See below 1 individual Hydrocarbon ---- mg/kg 380 Total Product —— sng/kg 15000 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 94 % Note -1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to a mixture of kerosene and lubricating oil. This mixture is characteristic of cutting oils, such as WD-40. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0077 >'1 Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D332B seco » Corning Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Sample 3 014751-0003-SA WASTE 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 22 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Wet Weight Reporting Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl 320000 mg/kg mg/kg ---- mg/kg Recovery 92 % See below 480 19000 1 ND •= Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski J 0079 J ,1 LI Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 Cooper Environmental Sample 4 014751-0004-SA WASTE 07 JUL 93 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 22 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Result 290000 Wet Weight Reporting Units Limit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg See below 1 400 16000 Recovery 90 % I •I u T . j > J.J Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to a mixture of kerosene and lubricating oil. This mixture is characteristic of cutting oils, such as WD-40. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0060 J J Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Cooper Environmental Sample 4 014751-0004-SA WASTE 07 JUL 93 P Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Modified ASTM Method D3328 Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Prepared: 22 JUL 93 iinseco A Coming Compjm Received: 07 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Parameter Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Individual Hydrocarbon Total Product Surrogate o-Terphenyl Wet Weight Reporting Result Units Limit 290000 mg/kg mg/kg ---- mg/kg Recovery 90 % See below 400 16000 ,1 J Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to a mixture of kerosene and lubricating oil. This mixture is characteristic of cutting oils, such as WD-40. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski .J 0081 1] n i 1 i 1 Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting Ae^^cl.™ Modified ASTM Method D3328 Client Name: Cooper Environmental Client ID: SB-1 Lab ID: 014751-0005-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 02 JUL 93 Received: 07 JUL 93 Authorized: 07 JUL 93 Prepared: 12 JUL 93 Analyzed: 21 JUL 93 Dry Weight Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 420 rag/kg See below 1 Individual Hydrocarbon ---- mg/kg 1-4 Total Product —— mg/kg 56 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl 21 % -- & Note 1 : QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: This sample has GC/F1D characteristics that are similar to products in the range of lubricating oil. Percent Moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. Note & : Surrogate recovery is outside of control limits. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Fred Morrison Approved By: Andrew Yaroshefski 0082