USVI Public Records

Document text

REPORT SI. ? •%^ el Knotville, Tennessee IT Project No. 409830 May 1995 TUT O07 1641 *65008* 65008 a*, «*»!?*."• ^ FT Project No. 409830 Ms. Caroline Kwan f Project Coordinator Eastern New York/Caribbean Superfund Section Emergency and Remedial Response Division t;; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency '-'n J ! Region n 290 Broadway, 20th Hoof |» New York, New York rlC Transmittal of Soil Remediation-Report. O'Henrv Laundry. Tutu. St. Thomas U.S. Virrin Islands Dear Ms. Kwan: "W C. '-Tt^ if'-' ,• if** * Enclosed please find four copies of the Soil Remediation Report for the O'Henry Laundry site in St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. If you have any questions regarding the report please contact L'Henry, Inc. Counsel Nancy D. Anna, Esq. at (809) 776-6533, or myself at (615) 690-3211. Sincerely yours, Belinda K. Price, RPG Project Manager BKP/dkc/1890 Enclosures cc: Andrew Praschak, EPA Leonard Reed, DPNR Adrian Schottroff, DPNR Nancy D. Anna, Esq. Jack McBurney, de Maximis, Inc. TUT 007 164 Table of Contents. List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Previous Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1.2 Soil Cleanup L e v e l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 2.0 Field Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Soil Boring Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2 Soil Excavation ............................................. 2-1 2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.2.2 Field Quality Control Samples ............................. 2-2 2.2.3 Field Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2.2.4 Backfilling of Excavation Area ........................... 2-3 2.3 Soil Venting Pile Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 2.4 Equipment Decontamination .................................... 2-4 2.5 Investigation-Derived Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 2.6 Variances from the Approved Work Plan ........................... 2-5 3.0 Soil Analytical Results ........................................... 3-1 3.1 Field Screening Analytical Results ................................ 3-1 3.2 Confirmation Sample Results ................................... 3-1 3.3 Geotechnical Testing ......................................... 3-3 4.0 Soil Remediation Progress Sampling and Operation and Maintenance of Soil Venting Pile .................................................. 4-1 4.1 Quarterly Soil Sampling ...................................... 4-1 4.2 Operations and Maintenance ................................... 4-2 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................. 5-1 6.0 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Appendix A - Visual Classification of Soils - Boring Logs Field Gas Chromatograph Screening Activities Variance Logs Validated Analytical Results Geotechnical Testing Results TUT 007 , KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTA)5-ll-9S(2.-46pmyD3/El 1 ' " 164.5, List of Tables. Table Title Follows Page 2-1 Summary of Site Remediation Analytical Sampling 2-2 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results 3-1 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results 3-1 3-3 Summary of EPA Split Sample Results 3-2 List of Figures- Figure Title Follows Page 1-1 Site Location Map 1-1 2-1 Soil Excavation and Soil Venting Pile Locations 2-1 2-2 Excavation Site Plan and Soil Boring Location 2-2 2-3 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 1-2 foot Depth 2-2 2-4 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 3-4 feet Depth 2-2 2-5 PCE Concentrations at Approximate 6-7 feet Depth 2-2 2-6 PCE Concentrations Beneath Excavation 2-2 2-7 PCE Concentrations in Excavation Walls 2-2 2-8 As-Biult Soil Venting Pile 2-4 KN/WP/1890/WP1890.T3CTA>5-ll-95(ll-^2jBnyD3yEl U TUT 007 1644 List of Acronyms ASTM American Society for Testing and Material CLP Contract Laboratory Program cm/s centimeters) per second DPNR Department of Planning and Natural Resources EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ft3 cubic foot; cubic feet GC gas chromatography {ig/kg micrograms per kilogram mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mL milliliter(s) PCE tetrachloroethane pcf pounds per cubic foot PID photoionization detector ppb parts per billion PRG preliminary remediation goal psi pounds per square inch QC quality control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SOW Statement of Work USCS Unified Soil Classification System USVI U.S. Virgin Islands VOC volatile organic compound KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/05-11- TUT 111 007 1645 /*****% 1.0 Introduction The O'Heray Laundry is located on Highway 38, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). The site is subject to an on-going remedial investigation/feasibility study which is being performed by others on an area wide basis. The origin of PCE and other volatile organic compounds (VOC) in groundwater beneath this and other properties in the Tutu area has yet to be determined. Contaminants, principally tetrachloroethane (PCE), have been detected in subsurface soils adjacent to the laundry. On behalf of L'Henri Inc., IT Corporation (IT) performed an evaluation of PCE in soil and determined that soil remediation was warranted in order to protect further degradation of groundwater in the vicinity of the laundry. Subsequent to that determination, L'Henri Inc. requested permission from the EPA to perform soil remediation. Between March 6 and 17, 1995, soil remediation efforts were conducted at the site. Soil remediation activities were conducted in accordance with the work plan prepared by IT (1994) approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region n and in confbrmance with a consent order between L'Henri Inc. and EPA signed March 1, 1995. '"^' EPA personnel performed oversight of the soil remediation activities and collected split samples as described in this report. The USVI Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) personnel visited the site during the soil removal efforts. This report addresses remediation of PCE in vadose zone soil in an area immediately adjacent to the southwest side of the O'Henry Laundry (Figure 1-1). Approximately 700 cubic feet (fr) of soil containing PCE was excavated and a soil venting pile was constructed at a secure area adjacent to the site. The objective of the soil remediation was to reduce the human health risk and the potential for shallow groundwater contamination resulting from known soil contamination. 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Previous Investigations A surface soil sample, e-01 (approximately at soil boring location SS1 on Figure 1-1), was collected by Camp, Dresser, McKee (CDM) from a location near the south-west comer of O'Henry Laundry in September 1988. Analytical results indicated the presence of "tetrach- loroethane" at a concentration of 440 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). In June 1989, three soil samples were collected by CDM from the same location as e-01 at different depth KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/05-ll-95(ll:S2amyD3/El 1-1 TUT 007 1646 HIGHWAY 38 MW02• MW01 • HARVEY WELL, -! C O O 0" 4s "-.I MW04• a SB10 MW03 • Approximate Scale: (feet) 25 50 Legend • Existing Monitor Well Ql Existing Soil Boring O Water Well FIGURE 1-1 SITE LOCATION MAP O'HENRY LAUNDRY ST. THOMAS U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS CD INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION STTHOMAS\SITEMAP.DRW/l]/5-10-95 intervals. Samples e-02-03, e-02-01, and e-02-02 were collected from the surface, and at depth intervals of 0.5 to 1.5 feet and 1.5 to 2.5 feet, respectively. Soil analytical results indicated that sample e-02-02 contained 1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethane, and tetrach- loroethane at concentrations of 0.02, 0.075, and 180 mg/kg, respectively. During subsequent investigations, six sofl borings were drilled and sampled at the site (Figure 1-1). Soil boring SS1, located near the southwest comer of the laundry, was targeted to be at the same location as e-01 and e-02 and was drilled and sampled in June 1990. The boring was drilled to a depth of approximately 24 feet, terminating at auger refusal. Five soil samples obtained from the boring were analyzed for EPA target compound list VOCs. Analytical results indicated the presence of acetone, 2-butanone, methylene chloride, PCE, and total xylenes. Acetone, 2- butanone, methylene chloride, and xylenes were found in the associated laboratory method blanks and are common laboratory reagents. Therefore, the concentrations of these substances may not be representative of actual field conditions. In the sample collected from a depth of 2.5 and 4.0 feet (sample TW2), PCE was detected at a concentration of 5,400 micrograms per kilogram (jig/kg). At a depth of approximately 6 feet (sample TW5), PCE was detected at a concentration of 59,000 ug/kg, and at a depth of approximately 19 feet (sample TW20), PCE was not detected (however, the detection level was elevated). Five additional soil borings have been drilled and sampled at the O'Henry Laundry and are discussed in Technical Memorandum II, Results of the Field Program, Tutu Service Station Investigation, St. Thomas, US. Virgin Islands (Geraghty and Miller, 1993). The soil borings are designated SB 10, SB11, SB 12, SB13, and SB13A in Figure 1-1. PCE was the only significant VOC detected. Concentrations above detection limits were as follows: • 29 ug/kg from soil boring SB 11 at 0.0 to 2.0 feet • 200 ug/kg from soil boring SB 13 at 4.0 to 6.0 feet • 15 u-g/kg from soil boring SB 13A at 0.0 to 2.0 feet. 1.1.2 Soil Cleanup Level Two criteria for the soil remediation were developed and presented in the work plan (IT, 1994). These criteria were a risk-based preliminary remediation goal (PRO) using a direct soil exposure scenario and a model-based determination of the maximum PCE concentration in soil that is protective of groundwater if not remediated. Both criteria were based on site- specific data. The soil cleanup level chosen for the soil remediation was 328 |xg/kg PCE, the more stringent Qower) of the two values calculated (IT, 1994). Prior to beginning soil remediation activities, discussion with the EPA personnel on site indicated that the EPA cleanup level was expected to be approximately 200 |ig/kg. The EPA cleanup level was KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTyDS-ll-9S(n:S2«nyD3/EI 1-2 -r, ,-,- reported by EPA personnel to be based on vadose zone modeling using site-specific para- meters and performed by an EPA contractor. The final results of the modeling were not available at the time of the soil remediation project but, based on the expected results and until the EPA cleanup level is finalized, 200 M-g/kg will be used on a provisional basis. At the request of the EPA, soil was removed to approximately 200 fig/kg. KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/05-ll-95(ll:52«T,yD3/El 1-3 "fy T ' 1649 2.0 Field Activities Between March 6 and 17, 1995, soil remediation activities were conducted at the site. Activities included installation of one soil boring, soil excavation, soil venting pile con- struction, backfill of the excavation area, and soil and water samples collection. Appendix A includes visual classification of soil boring logs, field gas chromatography screening activities, variance logs, validated analytical results, and geotechnical testing results. 2.1 Soil Boring Installation Previous analytical results indicated that the maximum concentration of PCE in subsurface sofl is approximately 59,000 ug/kg at a depth of 6 feet in soil boring SS1. Soil boring SS1 is located near the southwest side of the laundry (Figure 2-1). The maximum concentration detected in other borings around the site was 200 ug/kg was detected in soil boring SB 13, which is located near SS1. One soil boring, ITSB01, was drilled during the March 1995 field efforts. Sofl boring ITSB01 was installed in the area that previously exhibited the highest PCE concentrations (Figure 2-2). The purpose of the boring was to investigate the depth of sofl contamination, more accurately determine the depth to bedrock, and collect geotechnical samples. The boring was advanced to auger refusal at a depth of approximately 15 feet. The boring was visually logged in accordance with the Unified Sofl Classification System (USCS); a boring log is included in Appendix A. Two undisturbed samples were collected and submitted for the following analyses: grain size by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method D 422; moisture content by ASTM D 2216; permeability by ASTM D 5084; porosity/density by Engineering Manual (EM) 1110-2-1906, Appendix II; and organic content by ASTM D 2974. 2.2. Soil Excavation Soils in the vicinity of sofl boring SS1 were excavated in stages to depths of approximately 1 to 2 feet, 3 to 4 feet, 5 to 6 feet, and 7 to 8 feet. The location of the sofl excavation is shown in Figure 2-1. At each stage, undisturbed sofl samples were collected and analyzed by field gas chromatography (GC). At each interval, a minimum of three samples were collected from the floor of the excavation. Excavation continued until weathered bedrock was encoun- tered at a depth of 8 feet and PCE concentrations in sofl samples submitted for field GC analysis were below the cleanup level (200 ug/kg). A total of 35 sofl samples were collected for field GC analysis. On reaching the final dimensions of the excavation, five sofl samples were collected from the walls and floor of the excavation for confinnation that remediation KN/WP/1890/WP1890.T3CW5-11 -95(1 l:52«nyD3/El 2-1 TUT 007 HIGHWAY 38 MW02• MW01 • HARVEY WELL O MW04 B SB10 MW03 • a-m H- Scale: (feet) 25 50 Legend • Existing Monitor Well B Existing Soil Boring O Water Well Approximate Location of Soil Excavation Approximate Location of Soil Storage Area FIGURE 2-1 SOIL EXCAVATION AND SOIL VENTING PILE LOCATIONS O'HENRY LAUNDRY ST. THOMAS U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION STTHOMAS\SOILMAP.DRW/lj/5-10-95 goals had been met. The samples were analyzed for VOCs according to EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) 1990 Statement of Work (SOW) (Section 3.3). The extent of excavation at each stage, sampling locations and sample results are shown in Figures 2-2 through 2-7. The excavation was visually logged and a log is included in Appendix A. Excavated soils were temporarily stored on visqueen prior to the construction of a soil venting pile. 2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection During the remediation effort, soil samples were collected for two purposes. Screening samples were collected during excavation for field GC analysis. When the field laboratory had determined that the defined, cleanup level had been met, samples for confirmation were collected and sent to the fixed-base laboratory for analysis of VOCs by EPA CLP 1990 SOW protocol. In addition, soil samples from the upper 1 to 2 feet of the excavation were also sent to the laboratory at the request of the EPA. A summary of the soil sampling information, including sample numbers, locations, depths, and analyses are presented in Table 2-1. All samples for analysis were collected in a manner that minimized losing PCE by volatil- ization. Soil samples for analysis at the fixed-base laboratory were collected as grab samples and were packed unmixed into a glass container, leaving no headspace. The soil samples were immediately cooled to 4°C and snipped under appropriate chain of custody to the Quanterra Environmental Services laboratory in Knoxville, Tennessee for confirmation analysis. All sample results were validated by Quanterra in Knoxville. The EPA project manager collected split samples of some of the confirmation samples. The results of these split sample analyses are included in Section 3.0. 2.2-2 Field Quality Control Samples To ensure reliability of field sampling procedures and materials, field QC samples were collected or prepared for each sample shipment to the fixed based laboratory. Field QC samples included two trip blanks, one equipment rinsate, one field blank and one field duplicate sample. QC samples were analyzed for the same compounds as samples (CLP VOCs). Trip Blanks. Trip blanks are defined as samples that originate from analyte-free water taken from the laboratory to the sampling site and returned to the laboratory with the volatile KN/WP/18W/WP1890.TXTA>Ml-»(n:52»myD3/El 2-2 TUT 007 1652 TABLE 2-1 Summary of Stte Remediation Analytical Sampling O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 —i C H U1 Sample Location/ Description Borehole IT-SB-01 First Sampled Interval of Excavation Second Sampled Interva of Excavation Third Sampled Interval of Excavation Westerly Extension of Excavation Sample Number IT-SB-01 -05.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 IT-SB-01 -10.0 IT-SB-01-10.0-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-06 EXS-06MS EXS-06MD EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-10 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-15 EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 EXS-20 Sampled Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Coordinates (Feet) X- 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7,00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 2.75 f 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 9.50 z" 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.75 - 2.75 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1.00 - 1.25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 2.50 - 2.75 Field GC Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Confirmatory Analysis X X X X X X X X KLREME.XLSS/10/9S 1of2 5/10/956:21 PM H O xi U1 TABLE 2-1 Summary of Site Remediation Analytical Sampling O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Location/ Description Approximate Depth 6ft Excavation Walls Excavation Floor (Final Extent) Devcon Quarry (Excavation Backfill) Decontamination Water Equipment Rinse Field Blank Trip Blank Sample Number EXS-21 EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-27DU EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Devcon1-DP Devconl -MS Devconl -MD DCW-Mar-10-95 Equipment Rinse FB MAR 9-95 TB Mar 9-95 TB030695 Sampled Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 Coordinates (Feet) X* 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na na na na na na na na y* 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na na na na na na na na 2° 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na na na na na na na na Field GC Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Confirmatory Analysis X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X KLREME.XLS5/10/95 * X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest comer of the Uquor Bam. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Uquor Bam and O'Henry Laundry. 2 of 2 5/10/956:21 PM i rr/TJ/Tj/rfn Liquor Bam Excavation Area Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving (Depth Datum) LEGEND: I Soil boring SCALE: o S FEET FIGURE 2-2 Excavation Site Plan and Soil Boring Location O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG1 .dcw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT OO7 1655 Y (Feet) i I EXS19 I i Excavation Extended 3/8/95 Approximate Extent of Excavation at Nominal 1 ft. Depth Large Boulder 2' x 2' x 1.5' Top at 3' Depth /7/77/77/7Z Liquor Barn Large Boulder 3'x 3'x 2'Top at 2' Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Reld GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-3 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 1'-2' Depth (Approx.) O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG2.dlw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT 007 1656 Y (Feet) I V77/7777/77/ Liquor Barn Approximate Extent of Excavation at Nominal 3 ft. Depth Concrete Vault for 3,000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Field GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-4 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 3'-4' Depth (Approx.) O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG3.drw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TU". 1657 Y (Feet) t V77/7777/77/ Liquor Bam Approximate Limits of Excavation at 6 ft. Nominal Depth Concrete Vault for 3.000 Gallon AST Concrete Paving LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Reld GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-5 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) at 6'-?' Depth (Approx.) O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation FIG4.drw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT 007 1658 Y (Feet) ~/77/77/77/77i bquor Barn EXS32 (2.5 feet) X 64 (38) Approximate Limits of Excavation 'at 8 ft. Nominal Depth V EXS35 (8.25 feet) X 110 (160) \ EXS34 (8.25 feet) •. x N Concrete Paving LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Reld GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results ____concentrations in ug/kg SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-6 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) Beneath Excavation O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG5.drw/LHENRI/mc/3-24-94 TUT 007 AST Wall Extends -10' ^————— Concrete Slab X -It Liquor Barn EXS31 X 7Q EXS28 (560) X 243 X EXS30 (210) 156 x EXS27 195 (850) Ground Surface Ground Surface LEGEND: X EXS 35 - Soil sampling location 110 Reld GC analytical result concentrations in ug/kg (160) Confirmation sample results ___concentrations in ug/kg Not to Scale FIGURE 2-7 PCE Concentrations (ug/kg) in Excavation Walls O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG6.<Jjw/LHENRI/mc/3-27-94 TUT 007 166O organic samples. The purpose of the trip blank is to monitor potential cross contamination of the samples for volatiles during handling and shipment. One trip blank accompanied each cooler containing soil samples as it was transported to the fixed base laboratory. Equipment Rinsate. One equipment rinsate was collected to verify the effectiveness of sampling equipment decontamination and to monitor for potential cross contamination between samples. The equipment rinsate was collected from the final analyte-free water rinses of the equipment process. After a piece of sampling equipment was fully decontami- nated, deionized water was poured across it. The water then was collected in the appropriate sample container as the rinsate sample. Duplicate Samples. Duplicate samples were collected simultaneously with the original samples. Two duplicate samples were analyzed by the field laboratory and one duplicate sample was analyzed by the fixed base laboratory. Field Blank. A source blank is a sample from the final rinse water used for decontamina- tion, which is transferred from its original container to a sample container at the sample ., — N location. Field Screening Soil samples were collected and analyzed on site for the purpose of monitoring the removal of soil containing PCE adjacent to the O'Henry Laundry facility. The analytical program provided real-time data of reliable quality for the purpose of guiding the excavation and avoiding either the removal of an excessive amount of soil or the failure to remove enough soil prior to backfilling. Detection limits of between 4.33 and 12.5 fig/kg for PCE were used for the field laboratory analysis. Detailed soil screening field activities and analytical methods are included in Appendix A. 2.2.4 Backfilling of Excavation Area The excavation area was backfilled to grade using 30 tons of clean soils transported to the site from Devcon quarry located on Highway 38, in the Tutu area. The backfill material was sampled and submitted for field GC analysis (sample number Devcon 1). Analytical results indicated that PCE concentrations were below the detection limit of 5 [J-g/kg. The excavation KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXr/OS-ll-9S(1132«inyDVEl 2-3 007 1661 was filled in lifts. A motorized compactor was used to compact the material between the lifts. Photographs of the excavation process are included in Appendix B. 2.3 Soil Venting Pile Construction Excavated soils are being treated on site using ex situ soil venting to volatilize the contami- nants from the soil. The work plan for interim soil remediation (IT, 1994) indicated that soils found to contain detectable levels of PCE would be stored in Department of Transportation (DOT) approved 55-gallon drums or roll-off containers with plastic liners. However, during the March 1995 field activities, it was observed that the proposed storage area was upslope of the adjacent Liquor Bam and if the soil was drummed and stored per the work plan, loose drums could potentially roll into a parking area and become a safety hazard. The drummed soils also would eventually need to be treated as Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste to stringent PCE cleanup standards of 0.5 (ig/kg. Further, soil treatment facilities for solvent-contaminated soils are not available on the island of St. Thomas. Therefore, the EPA Project Coordinator and IT Task Manager agreed that construction of an on-site soil venting pile was a more viable soil treatment alternative to storing the soils in drums with a view to treating the soil at a later date. A verbal approval was obtained by the EPA Project Coordinator from the EPA Region n Superfund Branch Chief, and the change was approved in writing by the EPA Project Coordinator (see variance No. 6 in Appendix A). A soil pile is contained within a 15 by 25 foot concrete pad with 6 foot reinforced concrete walls (Figure 2-1). A shed roof was constructed over the soil venting pile to protect the soil pile against rainfall. Excavated soils were interlayered with washed coarse (1/2 to 1 inch) gravel. Four-inch diameter schedule 20 slotted corrugated black plastic vent pipes were placed horizontally in the gravel layers. Vent pipes were manifolded to roof turbines to provide passive circulation through the soil pile. A reinforced concrete block wall was built around the four sides of the soil pile. Currently, the soil pile is passively venting to the atmosphere, the USVI DPNR and the EPA have indicated mat no air permit is necessary. Figure 2-8 shows the as-built soil venting pile. Photographs showing the progressive soil pile construction process are included in Appendix B. 2.4 Equipment Decontamination The soil sample collection equipment was cleaned by the following steps prior to the collection of any soil samples. • All gross contamination and residual soils were removed by wiping with a moist towel or wire brush. KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTA»5-ll-95(n:52»myD3/El 2-4 6"x16" Reinforced Concrete Block Walls o- -O I CF o o Soil -#2 Gravel (washed) Soil — — -#2 Gravel (washed) - Q—Roof ^ Vent (6) Sloped ////////////////// Concrete Slab ///////////////// - — — — 4" Diameter slotted plastic pipe (bottom layer) 4" Diameter slotted plastic pipe (top layer and risers) SCALE: o 8 FEET FIGURE 2-8 As-Built Soil Venting Pile O'Henry Dry Cleaners Soil Remediation RG7.diW/LHENRI/mc/3-27-94 TUT 007 • Any equipment that came into contact with the soil sample was thoroughly washed internally and externally with a brush and warm water and non- phosphatic laboratory grade detergent. • All washed equipment were rinsed thoroughly with clean tap water, followed by a rinse with reagent grade hexane or methanol where hexane was not available (see variance log in Appendix A) and a second rinse with tap water. • The cleaned equipment was wrapped in either clean plastic or aluminum foil for storage and handling until used to collect a sample. All equipment used for soil excavation and stockpiling were decontaminated by steam cleaning at the beginning and end of the soil remediation. The equipment was decon- taminated by steam-cleaning at a steam temperature of 220°F and pressure of 1,000 pounds per square inch (psi) with potable water. 2.5 Investigation-Derived Waste All personnel protective equipment and waste plastic sheeting were double-bagged and disposed of in a sanitary landfill. A decontamination area was constructed by lining an appropriate area with 4-millimeter plastic sheeting. Straw bales were placed around the perimeter of the area (beneath the sheeting) to contain runoff, which was collected in a shallow sump. The fluids were pumped from the sump to a 55-gallon DOT approved drum. This was stored in a secure location at the O'Henry Laundry. The drum was labelled to indicate contents and volume. Pending chemical analysis and approval of the DPNR, decontamination water will be disposed in the sanitary sewer. 2.6 Variances from the Approved Work Plan The following variances were recorded during soil remediation activities: • Due to the shallow depth at which bedrock was encountered, soil boring ITSB01 was drilled to auger refusal at a depth of IS feet. It was anticipated that bedrock would be encountered at a depth of 25 feet. • A soil venting pile was constructed as a passive soil treatment alternative to drumming the soil for later treatment (Section 2.3). • Due to rocky soil conditions, which impeded sampling with a hand auger, some soil samples were collected with a stainless steel trowel. KN/WPn«90/WPI890.TXTA)5-ll-95{H:52«myD3/El 2-5 . r l . .,,-- lUl UU / As a result of a late arriving shipment of laboratory and monitoring supplies, the following variances were recorded during the first 2 days of the soil remediation field efforts (March 6 and 7, 1995): • A photoionization detector (FDD) and explosimeter were not available at the site during the installation of boring ITSB01. • Nonlaboratory grade deionized water was used in place of laboratory grade deionized water. • Methanol was used for equipment decontamination instead of hexane. Variance logs and the appropriate steps taken to obtain appropriate approvals are included in Appendix A. KN/WP/1890/WP1890.T3CTA)5-U-95(ni2«myD3/El 2-6 OO 7 1665 3.0 Soil Analytical Results 3.1 Field Screening Analytical Results Field screening analytical results are presented in Table 3-1 and on Figures 2-3 through 2-7. One out of the three samples collected during installation of boring ITSB01 was found to contain PCE concentrations above detection limits. A PCE concentration of 238 M-g/kg was detected in the sample collected at a depth of 5 feet below ground surface. PCE concentra- tions were below detection limits in samples collected at depth intervals of 10 feet and 14.5 feet below ground surface. All samples collected during the excavation contained PCE concentrations above detection limits. PCE concentrations ranged from 9.8 to 2,845 jig/kg. Twelve out of the thirty-five samples from the excavation area contained PCE concentrations above the threshold concen- tration of approximately 200 ug/kg recommended by the EPA. Only four screening samples exceeded the 328 ug/kg cleanup standard developed for the site by IT. PCE concentrations of 214 and 324 u.g/kg were detected at a depth of 1 to 2 feet in EXS-01 and EXS-04, -^ respectively. PCE concentrations of 254, 412, and 2,845 u,g/kg were found at a depth of 3 to 4 feet in EXS-10, EXS-11, and EXS-12, respectively. PCE concentrations of 274, 341, and 454 |ig/kg were detected at a depth of 6 feet in EXS-15, EXS-16, and EXS-17, respectively. Field screening analytical results indicated mat three samples from the wall adjacent to the concrete slab contained PCE concentrations above the EPA provisional cleanup level of 200 ug/kg. PCE concentrations of 275, 220, and 242 u.g/kg were detected in EXS-23, EXS-26, and EXS-28, respectively. However, due to physical limitations, it was not possible to remove any more soils; therefore, excavation was terminated. Field GC analysis of all samples collected at a depth of 8 feet indicated that PCE concentra- tions were below 200 jig/kg; therefore, the excavation was terminated. Field GC analysis on the backfill material (Devcon 1) indicated mat the fill was clean (Table 3-1). 3.2 Confirmation Samples Results Confirmation soil samples from soil boring ITSB-01, the excavation floor, walls, and the first "lift" and QC samples were analyzed at a fixed base laboratory for EPA's target analyte list /—-x VOCs according to CLP March 1990 SOW. Analytical results presented in Table 3-2 and on Figures 2-3 through 2-7 indicated the presence of PCE, trichloroethane, 1,1,2 trichloroethane, KN/WPA890/WP1890.TXT/DS-H-95(2:33pmyi»/El 3-1 TUT 007 TABLE 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number IT-SB-01-05.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 IT-SB-01-10.0 IT-SB-01-10.0-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-06 EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-10 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-15 EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 Collected Date 6-Mar-95 e-Mar-95 G-Mar-95 e-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 2:20 PM 3:35 PM 3:10 PM 3:1 0PM 12:35 PM 1:00 PM 1:20 PM 1:45 PM 2:05 PM 8:40 AM 9:1 5 AM 9:30 AM 9:40 AM 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 AM 12:05 PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:1 5PM 3:30 PM 4:00 PM Analyzed Date 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 12:21 PM 1:12 PM 1:37 PM 2:04 PM 3:48 PM 4:19 PM 4:49 PM 5:53 PM 7:10 PM 11:36 AM 12:02 PM 12:29 PM 1:05 PM 1:34 PM 2:27 PM 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 5:07 PM 2:36 AM 3:00 AM 5:22 AM 5:46 AM 6:09 AM Coordinates (Feet) rf 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7.00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 y" 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 z" 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 - 2.75 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1.00 - 1.25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 PCE pg/kg 237.69 12.38 4.33 4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324.09 83.95 9.81 171.78 189.10 70.20 254.20 412.31 2844.90 101.84 136.02 274.15 341.22 454.18 34.20 71.89 Lab Qua). U1 u U B2 B B B B E3 X! 0- KLRESULT 1of2 5/10/95 7:24 PM TABLE 3-1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number EXS-20 EXS-21 EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Deveon1-DP Collected Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 B-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 g-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 4:1 0PM 4:1 5PM 4:20 PM 12:00 12:10 12:50 13:10 13:55 14:10 14:50 15:35 15:55 16:15 16:27 16:04 17:00 18:24 18:24 Analyzed Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 6:30 AM 7:29 AM 11:06 AM 3:59 PM 4:24 PM 4:46 PM 2:43 AM 3:07 AM 3:30 AM 3:52 AM 4:16 AM 5:1 5 AM 5:38 AM 6:01 AM 6:50 AM 7:1 8 AM 9:36 AM 10:05 AM Coordinates (Feet) x- 2.75 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na / 9.50 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na z» 2.50 - 2.75 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na PCE P9/kg 62.42 133.71 28.40 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U —ic o~ o- 0- CO * X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest corner of the Uquor Bam. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Liquor Barn and O'Henry Laundry. 1 U-Not detected. 2 B - Detected in associated field laboratory blank. 3 E - Estimated concentration exceeding calibration range. KLRESULT 2 of 2 5/10/95 7:24 PM TABLE 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results O'Heniy Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 H O Sample Number IT-SB-01-05.0 IT-SB-01-10.0 IT-SB-01-14.5 TB030695 ESX-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-05 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-27DU Parameter Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Xylenes (total) Tetrachloroethene Chloromethane Toluene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethane Toluene Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Benzene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Concentration pg/kg 120 2 11 11 140 2 18 120 12 3 54 1 1 100 100 290 21 1 190 300 2 €50* 2 4 GTW 2 Validation Qualifier J U U D J J J J J D D J D J D J J D J KLCONF.XLS 1of2 5/11/95 2:33 PM TABLE 3-2 Summary of CLP Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 H Cf- Sample Number EX-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 FBMAR995 TBMAR995 DCWMAR1095 EQUIPMENTRIN Parameter Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Tetrachloroethene Toluene Benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane Acetone Chloromethane Acetone 1,2-Dichloroethane Concentration pg/kg 210 150 4 8 -*ree»* 3 *6ft 2 38 4 2 31 1 170 2 4 160 10 1 1 45 6 1 1 Validation Qualifier D D J J J D J J J J J J J J J J J J J KLCONF.XLS 2 of 2 5/11/95 2:33 PM chloromethane, benzene, toluene, and total xylenes. PCE concentrations ranged from 2 Jig/kg in IT-SB-01-10.0 to 1,100 Hi/kg "* EXS-30. Trichloroethane was detected in only two samples. Samples EXS-01 and EXS-31 were found to contain trichloroethane at estimated concentrations of 2 and 3 lig/kg, respectively. 1,1 ^-Trichloroethane was detected at an estimated concentration of 8 M-g/kg in EXS-30. Chloromethane was detected in sample EXS- 04 at an estimated concentration of 1 }ig/kg. Benzene concentrations ranging from 2 M-g/kg (estimated) to 18 }ig/kg were found in four samples. Toluene concentrations ranged from estimated concentrations of 1 Jig/kg in EXS-04 to 12 Jig/kg in EXS-02. Total xylenes were found at an estimated concentration of 3 }ig/kg in EXS-02. The analytical validation packages are included in Appendix A. All samples collected from soil boring ITSB-01 and the first "lift" contained PCE concentra- tions that were below the threshold value of 200 |ig/kg. Only the soil sample from a 5-foot depth in boring ITSB-01 contained PCE above the detection limit. Three samples collected from the excavation walls, EXS-23, EXS-26, and EXS-28 showed PCE concentrations above 200 M-g/kg, similar to the field GC analytical results. Confirmation results indicated that three additional samples from the excavation walls, EXS-27, EXS-30, and EXS-31, contained PCE concentrations above 200 fig/kg. Field GC analysis had showed these samples to contain PCE concentrations below the cleanup level of 200 H-g/kg. The samples were collected from the area located adjacent to or beneath concrete paving between the O'Henry Laundry and the Liquor Barn (Figure 2-7). Fixed laboratory sample results confirmed that the excavation floor soils were below the threshold value of 200 fig/kg. Therefore, all soils with PCE contamination beneath the unpaved area had been excavated. EPA split sample results are presented in Table 3-3. Four of the EPA split samples showed PCE concentrations that were above the cleanup level of 200 |ig/kg. Samples EXS-2S, EXS- 28, EXS-30, and EXS-31 showed estimated PCE concentrations of 210, 220, 480, and 630 Hg/kg, respectively. These samples showed PCE concentrations that were approximately the same as the FT confirmation results, except for sample EXS-30 where the FT confirmation sample result was approximately twice the EPA split sample results. The samples were collected from the north wall located adjacent to the concrete slab where excavation was terminated due to physical limitations. TUT 007 1671 KN/WPA890/WP1890.TXT/05-ll-95(3:17pmyD3/El 3-2 Table 3-3 Summary of EPA Split Sample Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin islands IT Project Number 409830 Sample Number EXS023 EXS024 EXS025 EXS028 EXS030 EXS031 EXS032 EXS033 EXS034 Parameter Acetone 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Bromoform Tetrachtoroethene Xytenes (total) Tetrachloroethene Acetone Tetrachloroethene Acetone Tetrachloroethene Methytene chloride Acetone 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene Acetone Trichtoroethene Tetrachloroethene Acetone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl 1-2-pentanone Tetrachloroethene Tetrachloroethene Acetone Tetrachloroethene Result (ng/kg) 21J 2J 36J 43J 2J 100J 2J 2J 4J 21 OJ 9J 220J 2J 45J 3J 480J 51J 4J 630J 15J 9J 7J 34J 30J 10J 30J Notes: J - Estimated concentration KN:\COMMCXAWPJ89(KWP1890.3-3/QS/l(V9S(SH)9pmVDO/NE TUT OO7 1672 -~ 3.3 Geotechnical Testing Two geotechnical samples were collected from borehole ITSB01. Samples were tested for permeability, porosity, density, moisture content, grain size, and fractional organic content. Results of the geotechnical testing are included in Appendix A. These results indicate that the soils in the vadose zone at the site have a vertical permeability of 1.7 x 10"7 centimeters per second (cm/s). Particle size with hydrometer analysis results indicated a fine sand with traces of silt The soil was calculated to have a moisture content of 11.8 percent, a bulk density of 107.09 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), and a dry density of 95.76 pcf. Results indicated porosity of 44.76 percent and a fractional organic content of 0.015. KN/WP/189<VWP1890.TXTA)5-ll-95(2:48pmyD3/El 3-3 ' " °O/ 4.0 Soil Remediation Progress Sampling and Operations and Maintenance of Soil Venting Pile 4.1 Quarterly Soil Sampling Soil sampling of the venting pile will be conducted on a quarterly basis for a period of one year to monitor the progress of the soil remediation and to determine when the soils can be considered clean. The soil pile consists of two soil layers with each layer divided into quadrants by the venting pipes (Section 2.3). One discrete soil sample will be collected from the approximate center of each quadrant in each layer with the depth of the sample to be determined as described below during each sampling event. A total of eight samples will be collected from the soil pile per sampling event. In order to ensure reliability of field sampling procedures and materials, quality control (QC) samples will be collected or prepared. QC samples will include one field duplicate, one trip blank and an equipment rinsate sample per sampling event. Samples will be analyzed for EPA's target analyte list VOCs according to EPA's CUP March 1990 SOW. All data will be validated. It is anticipated that stainless steel bucket augers will be used for soil sample collection. Samples will be collected continuously through each layer at each location and headspace measured for VOCs using a PID or FED. The sample exhibiting the most elevated FDD or FED reading for each layer at each location will be sent to the laboratory for analysis. Soil removed from the pile, but not sent to the laboratory for analysis will be placed back in the pile at the location from which it was removed. Decontamination procedures for soil sample collection equipment will be similar to the procedures followed during soil remediation effort in accordance with the work plan for evaluation and interim soil remediation (IT, 1994). Sampling will be conducted in accordance with the health and safety plan included in Appendix A of the soil remediation work plan (IT, 1994). A letter report with validated data will be transmitted to the EPA within two months after each sampling event. If, at the end of the four quarters of soil sampling, the soils are shown to have concentrations less than the provisionally accepted cleanup level of 200 ug/kg (or as determined by the EPA), then the soil venting will be considered complete and no further soil sampling will be required. KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/D5-ll-9S(3:17pmyiB/El 4-1 4J2 Operations and Maintenance During quarterly soil sampling activities, the walls, roof and other components of the soil venting pile structure will be examined. If repairs are needed, these shall be recommended to L'Henri at the time they are noticed. Since the soil venting pile is a passive system no other operations or maintenance activities are anticipated. KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXTA)5-n-95(n:S2«nyD3/El 4-2 TUT OO7 1675 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations Soil remediation efforts have removed the source of potential groundwater contamination at the O 'Henry Laundry site. Soils that contained PCE concentrations above the provisional cleanup level recommended by the EPA of 200 fig/kg were excavated and a soil venting pile was constructed at the site. Because of the low PCE concentrations found in the soils during excavation activities, it is anticipated that passive soil venting to the atmosphere will be sufficient to volatilize PCE from the soil. Residual PCE concentration in soils remaining in place beneath the edge of the concrete paving appears to be an unlikely source of continuing groundwater contamination based on several lines of evidence: • The volume of residual contamination appears to be restricted to a relatively small area immediately beneath the margin of the concrete paving. Data obtained from soil boring ITSB-01 and from the excavated soils show that peak concentrations occur near the edge of the paved surface between depths of approximately 4 and 6 feet. Concentrations in the excavated area decreased drastically with lateral distance from the paved area and with depth. Also, a previous soil boring (SB12 in Figure 1-1) was drilled through the paved area approximately 25 feet east of the excavated area. As discussed in Section 1.1.1, PCE was not detected in this boring, indicating mat soil containing elevated PCE concentration is not extensive beneath the paved area. • Although PCE concentrations in several confirmation samples from the trench wall beneath the edge of the paved area exceeded 200 |ig/kg, they did so by, at most, a factor of approximately five. This may mean mat the average concentra- tion of PCE in the volume of soil from which the samples were obtained is nearly equal to the cleanup standard. It should be noted that the cleanup standard is based on vadose zone modeling in which PCE is hypothesized to be distributed throughout the vertical extent of the vadose zone from the ground surface to the water table. Based on the data collected during the soil rem- ediation, the actual vertical extent of contamination appears restricted to an approximately 2-foot-thick zone that is approximately 16 feet above the water table. Concentrations in such a zone would need to be much higher than 200 fig/kg to result in detectable concentrations of PCE in groundwater. • An effective migration pathway for the transport of residual PCE beneath the edge of the paved area may not exist. Vadose zone modeling used to estimate the PCE cleanup levels incorporate assumed or estimated groundwater recharge resulting from infiltration of precipitation through unpaved soil. Because the area overlying the locations of the samples with PCE concentrations exceeding 200 fig/kg is paved, infiltration, and hence, potential migration of PCE would be reduced. Reduced infiltration rates would tend to increase the minimum concen- trations (cleanup level) necessary for detectable groundwater contamination. KN/WPA890/WP1890.TXTA)5-ll-95(3:36pniyr>3/El 5-1 TUT 007 1676 Soil Boring ITSB-01 was targeted into the location where previous soil samples had indicated the highest PCE concentrations. Soil samples from this boring indicate lower concentrations man previously detected. In addition, samples from boring ITSB-01 indicate PCE concentra- tions below detection level from the 10-foot depth and below. This confirms that excavation of soils to 8-foot depth has removed all PCE-contaminated soils. Based on the conclusions, it is recommended mat no further in situ remediation be performed at the site. Quarterly soil sampling of the soil venting pile will take place for a period of 1 year to monitor the progress of the ex situ soil remediation. KN/WPA890/WPJ890.TXr/05-ll-95(3:36pmyD3/El 5-2 'TUT OO7 1677 6.0 References Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 1993, Technical Memorandum II, Results of the Field Program, Tutu Service Station Investigation, St. Thomas, VJS. Virgin Islands. IT Corporation, 1994, Work Plan for Evaluation and Interim Remediation of Soils, O'Henry Laundry, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1995, Administrative Order on Consent for Removal Action No. n-CERCLA-95-0401. m KN/WP/1890/WP1890.T3CT/05-n-9S(ll:32«nyD3/El 6-1 TUT 007 167Q APPENDIX A VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS - BORING LOGS HELD GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SCREENING ACTIVITIES VARIANCE LOGS VALIDATED ANALYTICAL RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WPA890/\W?1890.T3CrA)5-10-95(7-30pmyD2/El . .,-.< TUT !->0/ VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS - BORING LOGS ^Xv TUT OO7 1680 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.002 PROJECT NAME: L'HENRI Soil Remediation BORING NUMBER: Excavation COORDINATES: ELEVATION: GWL DEPTH: DATE: ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: K Loy GWL DEPTH: DATE: DRILLING METHODS: BACKHOE 1 £ —— 0 — — 2 — — 4 — — — _ 6 — _ — l^™ O aipBim — —— — 10 — OL *~ SS b DESCRIPTION Moderate yellow brown (10 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with day. slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction angular to subangular igneous rock fragments, highly weathered, discrete bodies of organic material up to 8" diameter. Layer is massive, contains manmade debris, nails, wire, wood, 1/2" thick caliche at base, continuous. (See next description). Olive gray (5 Y 3/2), SILT, thinly laminated, forms continuous Moderate yellow brown (10 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with day, slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction as above, weakly stratified, root zone at base. Light brown (5 YR 6/4), sandy SILT with day, slightly moist, increasing sand content with depth, light olive gray (5 Y 5/2), andesite boulders and cobbles starting at 6 feet Base of Excavation (Fractured Bedrock - Not Rippabte with Backhoe) 03 ml (fill) ml ml DATE: 3/10/95 DATE STARTED: 3/7/95 DATE COMPLETED: 3/9/95 Measured 1 Consistency (TSF) 1 REMARKS NOTES: Depth measured from concrete slab: Vertical Scale: 1" = ? Logged from vertical face at excavation L J. J UTBWIATIONAL H •• HI TTCHMQL QCY directly beneath concrete slab UJ COWKWATION "UT O07 1681 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS / "*H PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.002 PROJECT NAME: L'HENRI Soil Remediation /•"*' /*— ^ BORING NUMBER: ITSB01 COORDINATES: ELEVATION: GWL DEPTH: DATE ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: K. Loy GWL DEPTH: DATE: DRILLING METHODS: ff HOLLOW STEM AUGER; 18' X 1.5" I.D. SPLIT SPOON; 140 LB HAMMER ^ *T — — _ _ — 5 — — — — 10 — _ —— — 15 — — — — 20 — — 25 —— f l 08 # § ITSB -05.0 1420 LH01 1435 LH02 1440 tTSB -10.0 1510 ITSB -14.5 1535 a| § c" SS. 5<g 3/3/4 17/25/16 23/55/74 58/79/R £• § *F 1 ~ 8' 10" 12- 8" DESCRIPTION Moderate yellow brown (10 YR 5/4), sandy SILT with day, slightly moist, plastic, sand fraction angular to subangular volcanic rock fragments - highly weathered, discrete bodies of organic matter Light brown (5 YR 6/4), sandy SILT with day, moist, grading to andesite, light olive gray (5 Y 5/24), weathered, dissegregated, dry Dusky yellow green (5GY5/2), andesite, fractured, unweathered, dry Light olive gray (5 Y 5/2) silty fine SAND, some day, dry, appears derived from weathered bedrock (See footnote) Auger Refusal at 1 5 Ft. i 8 CO ml (Fill) ml veath. And. And. sm DATE: 3/6/95 DATE STARTED: 3/6/95 DATE COMPLETED: 3/6/95 I 1 a S w Z 6 REMARKS Split sample: CLPVOC/ReldGC Shelby Tube 16oz. geotechnical Split sample: CLP VOC/FieW GC Split sample: CLP VOC/Field GC Attempted shelby tube sample - refusal on rock - bent shelby tube NOTES: Drilling Contractor Caribbean Drilling Services, St Croix, USVI Driller Denzel Dawkins - Helper: Shawn McConnel, Westey Jameson - Caribbean Hydrotech. FF3 INTBUMTK>NAL sm - In situ material probably retains bedrock structure, disaggregates on sampling P If B I^^'l^L And. - Andesite Weath. And. -Weathered Andesite ITSeoi/LHENW/drw/mc/3-27-8S TIP OO7 1682 FIELD GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SCREENING ACTIVITIES KN/WP/I890/WP1890.TXTA>5-10-9SC7:40pmyiX'El TUT OO7 1683 Field Analytical Activities at the O'Henry Laundry Site 1.0 Narrative of Events A field chemist was mobilized from Quanterra Environmental Services Field Analytical Services (FAS) group to St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), on March 5, 1995, to analyze soils at the O'Henry Laundry Site for tetrachloroethene (PCE). The equipment that was mobilized included two gas chromatographs (GC), two portable computers, two dot matrix printers, an analytical balance, and miscellaneous laboratory supplies. Extremely small volume standards were transported with the equipment in accordance with applicable safety regulations. Larger volumes of solvents were transported by ship from Puerto Rico. The required instrumentation was set up in a rental van parted near the site on Monday, March 6, 1995. The purpose of the March 6 activities was to calibrate the gas chromatograph under field conditions. Five-point calibration was accomplished in the field, but trap and oven cool down times were extremely long. Heat transfer to warm air is not efficient, and the cool down time was extended by the warm climate at the site. A decision was made to set up the equipment in an air conditioned hotel room effective March 7, prior to analyzing any samples. Samples were collected on March 6 through March 9, 1995. The samples collected on March 6 were collected from soil boring IT-SB-01, and most subsequent samples were collected from the floor and walls of an excavation as described in the geologist's field logs. One sample of fill soil was obtained and screened for tetrachloroethene. The samples were analyzed from March 7 to March 10, 1995, when the laboratory was demobilized and returned to Knoxville. The analytical results are presented in Table 1. All samples were analyzed using a GC SRI Model 8610 equipped with a photoionization detector and a built in chemical trap containing Tenax absorbent. A thick film, nonpolar chromatographic column was used to separate PCE from earlier eluting analytes and the surrogate compound, 2-chlorotoluene (CT). Air supplied by an in-board pump was filtered to remove hydrocarbon impurities and used as the GC carrier gas. TUT 007 1684 TABLE 1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Results O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number rr-SB-01-os.o rr-SB-01-14.5 rr-SB-oi-io.o IT.SB-01-10.0-DP EXS-01 EXS-02 EXS-03 EXS-04 EXS-OS EXS-06 EXS-07 EXS-08 EXS-09 EXS-10 EXS-11 EXS-12 EXS-13 EXS-14 EXS-1S EXS-16 EXS-17 EXS-18 EXS-19 Collected Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 2:20 PM 3:35 PM 3:10 PM 3:10 PM 12:35 PM 1:00 PM 1:20 PM 1:45 PM 2:05 PM 8:40 AM 9:1 5 AM 9:30 AM 9:40 AM 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 AM 12:05 PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 4:00 PM Analyzed Date 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 12:21 PM .1:12 PM 1:37 PM 2:04 PM 3:48 PM 4:19 PM 4:49 PM 5:53 PM 7:1 0PM 11:36 AM 12:02 PM 12:29 PM 1:05 PM 1:34 PM 2:27 PM 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 5:07 PM 2:36 AM 3:00 AM 5:22 AM 5:46 AM 6:09 AM Coordinates (Feet) if 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 5.50 10.30 1.25 9.00 7.00 5.00 1.50 5.50 2.50 f 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 6.75 4.00 7.50 0.00 2.00 0.50 -1.50 7.50 5.00 -2.50 1.75 3.50 6.25 12.00 z" 5.00 - 5.60 14.50 - 15.00 10.00 - 10.50 10.00 - 10.50 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 - 2.75 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 - 2.75 3.00 - 3.25 1.00 - 1.25 2.75 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.25 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 3.75 - 4.00 6.00 - 6.25 7.00 - 7.25 6.00 - 6.25 6.50 - 6.75 2.25 - 2.50 PCE pg/fcg 237.69 12.38 4.33 4.98 214.40 197.26 181.34 324.09 83.95 9.81 171.78 189.10 70.20 254.20 412.31 2844.90 101.84 136.02 274.15 341.22 454.18 34.20 71.89 Lab Qua). U1 U U B2 B B B B E3 C; 'x! 03 c.n KLRESULT 1of2 VI0/95 6:05 PM TABLE 1 Summary of Field Screening Analytical Result* O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 -J, .•"" •'—• Sample Number EXS-20 EXS-21 EXS-22 EXS-23 EXS-24 EXS-25 EXS-26 EXS-27 EXS-28 EXS-29 EXS-30 EXS-31 EXS-32 EXS-33 EXS-34 EXS-35 Devconl Devconl-DP Collected Date 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 g-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 Time 4:10 PM 4:1 5PM 4:20 PM 12:00 12:10 12:50 13:10 13:55 14:10 14:50 15:35 15:55 16:15 16:27 16:04 17:00 18:24 18:24 Analyzed Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 6:30 AM 7:29 AM 11:06 AM 3:59 PM 4:24 PM 4:46 PM 2:43 AM 3:07 AM 3:30 AM 3:52 AM 4:16 AM 5:15 AM 5:38 AM 6:01 AM 6:50 AM 7:18 AM 9:36 AM 10:05 AM Coordinates (Feet) x" 2.75 11.66 9.00 10.00 10.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 1.25 -1.50 4.25 3.75 2.00 8.25 6.00 3.25 na na / 9.50 0.00 3.25 -3.75 -2.33 -2.75 -0.50 2.33 2.00 5.00 -0.50 -1.25 10.00 -0.75 3.00 3.50 na na z° 2.50 - 2.75 5.50 - 5.75 6.00 - 6.25 4.00 - 4.25 6.33 - 7.33 4.00 - 4.25 6.00 - 6.25 5.75 - 6.00 4.25 - 4.50 5.00 - 5.25 5.33 - 5.58 3.75 - 4.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 8.00 - 8.50 na na PCE fa/kg 62.42 133.71 28.40 275.38 57.80 173.90 220.33 195.14 242.71 171.46 155.45 169.41 63.61 15.17 74.60 109.65 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U CD 0" * X and Y coordinates are referenced to the northwest corner of the Uquor Bam. The X direction corresponds approximately to the north. The Y direction corresponds approximately to west. b The Z coordinate (depth) is referenced to the top of the concrete paving between the Uquor Bam and O'Henry Laundry. 1 U-Not detected. 2 B - Detected in associated field laboratory blank. 3 E - Estimated concentration exceeding calibration range. KLRESULT 2 of 2 5/10/95 6:05 PM 2.0 Quality Assurance Activities Statistical analyses of all recovery data are presented in Table 2. Percent recovery averages and standard deviations are presented for continuing calibrations, matrix spikes, and surrogates. The allowed range of value, for a 95 percent confidence interval is also calculated. 2.1 Calibration A five-point calibration curve was generated on March 6, 1995. Continuing calibration standards were run at least daily as shown in Table 3. The continuing calibration standard that was run on the morning of March 9 was considered to be too divergent from the initial calibration curve. Four more standards were analyzed to provide raw data with which to calculate a new five-point calibration for PCE, and a four-point calibration for CT. A final continuing calibration standard was run on March 10 to indicate that the test method remained in control. The average PCE recovery for the continuing calibration standards was 98.7 percent, with a standard deviation of 1.9 percent. The upper and lower limits of the population of recoveries predicted by these standards were 95 percent and 102.5 percent, respectively, at a 95 percent confidence interval. The surrogate, 2-chlorotoluene, exhibited higher variability, but was clearly in control. 22 Matrix Spike Recovery The original work plan called for three matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) pairs to be analyzed. Increases in the number of samples analyzed over the original scope of I services cost time, and only two pairs of matrix spike samples were analyzed. Matrix spike data are reported in Table 4. The average recovery for PCE was 98.6 percent, with a 1 standard deviation of 5.1 percent. Based on these results, the matrix spike recoveries would be expected to be within 88 and 109 percent recovery. The recovery data were very I reproducible, with relative percent difference (RPD) of 3.3 percent and 3.8 percent. Based on these data, the accuracy and precision of the test method was in control. 1 2.3 Surrogate Recovery Each sample was spiked with surrogate (CT) to monitor the test in progress. Surrogate f recoveries were expected in the range of 60 to 140 percent recovery. In fact, surrogate /*— recovery ranged from 77.3 to 132.9 percent recovery after outlier results were rejected from | consideration. The results for analyses that exhibited poor recoveries were generally rejected, • 1687 -i O H- Ci*- CO CQ TABLE 2 Statistical Analysts of Quality Assurance Parameters O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Parameter Continuing Calibration Standard % Recovery Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2-Chlorotoluene {CT.surr) Matrix Spike % Recovery Tetrachloroethene (PCE) Surrogate % Recovery 2-Chlorotoluene (CT.surr) * Average 98.7% 100.7% 98.6% 105.1% Standard Deviation 1.9% 6.6% 5.1% 13.9% 95% Confidence Interval Upper 95.0% 87.6% 88.3% 77.3% Lower 102.5% 113.9% 108.9% 132.9% * Outlier value for IT-SB-01 -10.0 was excluded. KLSTAT.XLS Of1 4/13/95 8:29 AM H Oo Si 0-- 03 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING CALIBRATION DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number Standard, Sppb Standard, 20ppb Standard, SOppb Standard, 100ppb Standard, 100ppb Standard, 200ppb CCV STD SOD CCV STD EOD CCV STD SOD Standard, 100/100 Standard, 50/100 Standard, 20/50 Standard, 5/25 Standard, 200/200 CCV STD EOD Collected Date na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na Time na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na Analyzed Date 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 2:31 PM 2:57 PM 3:29 PM 4:05 PM 4:34 PM 5:07 PM 11:32 AM 7:40 PM 10:54 AM 11:53 AM 12:18 PM 12:41 PM 1:08 PM 2:00 PM 12-.53PM PCE ug/kg na na na na na na 50.63 49.53 48.65 na na na na na 48.65 PCE %Recovery na na na na na na 101.3% 99.1% 97.3% na na na na na 97.3% CT %Recovery na na na na na na 99.7% 108.1% 92.4% na na na na na 102.9% KLCAL.XLS Of1 4/13/95 8:35 AM TABLE 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S.VIrgln Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number Devcon1-MS Devcon1-MD IT-EXS-06-MS IT-EXS-06-MD Collected Date 9-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 Time 18:24 18:24 8:40 AM 8:40 AM Analyzed Date 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 11:19AM 11:42 AM 12:05 PM 12:28 PM Coordinates (Feet X na na 6.00 6.00 y na na 6.75 6.75 z(D na na 2.00 2.00 2(2) na na 3.00 3.00 PCE %Recovery 101.1% 104.4% 92.8% 96.3% CT %Recovery 103.0% 109.5% 97.8% 96.0% c '—i .,.4. o- •43 ta m IAI yi s 1of1 4/13/95 8:58 AM and not reported. Samples having poor surrogate recoveries were immediately reanalyzed. The average surrogate recovery was 105.1 percent with a standard deviation of 13.9 percent. 2.4 Method Blank Contamination Method blank data are reported in Table 5. Only one method blank exhibited any level of contamination by PCE. Method blank MBLK1 had 0.61/ig/L PCE reported. The sample data that was associated with this blank was flagged as B (blank contamination) whenever PCE was detected. However, the blank contamination was far below the observed values for the samples, and did not affect the results. 2.5 Variances The three variances that occurred during the analytical portion of this project were as follows: • Two MS/MSD pairs were analyzed instead of three. • Only two pairs of results were duplicated by the field laboratory instead of three. • One sample should have been extracted with methanol and reanalyzed. Sample IT-EXS-12 was reported as 2844 jUg/kg E because even an 0.5-gram sample gave over-range results. The methanol that was shipped to St. Thomas was not obtained in time to extract and reanalyze the sample. G:\K\O-Haa7\KLKBn\tf 3 TUT 007 1691 H H- 0- -0 rO TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF BLANK DATA O'Henry Laundry Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S.Virgin Islands IT Project Number 409830.002 Sample Number SOD Blank SOD Blank MBLK1 EOD Blank SOD Blank MBLK2 SOD Blank MBLK3 Analyzed Date 6-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 7-Mar-95 8-Mar-95 9-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 10-Mar-95 Time 1:56PM 10:45 AM 8:09 PM 8:36 PM 10:1 9 AM 11:29 AM 7:49 AM 1:18 PM PCE ug/kg 5.00 5.00 0.61 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Lab Qual. U U J U U U U U PCE %Recovery na na na na na na na na CT %Recovery na na 111.7% 0.0% 0.0% 140.8% 0.0% 95.1% KLBLK.XLS 1of1 4/13/95 8:48 AM 3.0 Conclusions The data obtained at the O'Henry Laundry Site were in control. One sample was reported over-range, but the value was clearly above the action level for the remediation. The field laboratory program was successful. TUT °07 1693 VARIANCE LOGS KN/WP/1890/WPl«90.TXT/05-10-95(7:40pinyD2/EI jyj QQ7 1694 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO.. VARIANCE LOG f PROJECT N O . f - ^ ^ , _________ _ _________ PAGE _sAe-<J PRQJECT MAur t^^^ _se-< ^<Le<^. _____ DATF- . , . . '.-•£• • • '. .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIRCATION) ^>^£/ J&< 0r. &^A£i' -4^&4 &4&/ ^tU^e*^S*/- ..._ ____ /' / jf ^ sttz <s*S/M<*t"*-r ^^ ^g^tfdLtzj? . <<i<&>&^j £/£i>~^/7 T APPLICABLE DOCUMENT: CC: REQUESTED RY- APPROVED RY i Quality DATE: 40N1C-7 TUT OO7 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO ,f1 ,«SK? '&,HI • •*&'• . • ?'*» 1 ~^' ' '*> V. VARIANCE LOG -PROJECT NO. PROJECT Ll ( »'cCtf PAGE DATF- .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSHF1CATION) ** crt.*f' (J ' /-N <£- / APPLICABLE DOCUMENT: -„/{ &t6:* / tv^-o£^ y (L i , / / CC: REQUESTED APPROVED Quality Aaturane* Ofliar .DATE:< .DATE:. .DATE:. i 40M1»-7 TUT OO rv- i. •!X.r. '•'to-/ •m INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO. VARIANCE LOG ^Jv iI '"V' PROJECT PROJECT NAME '<N«£*i»w/ So//' /\ <^^^yff '£. DATE: .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) ^t^^c^i " / //c£*.*X , S jL ' * X/tCL ^ct^itzf i&T *-£ /€> ^t-lbt/^s?^ *^C&#jcdL) APPLICABLE DOCUMENT: £S ., / €^/ /* ^ * ^r LLtts/£+s<Z^Z &* RV HATF. Quality Aawrane* Offlew .DATE: DATE: . TUT 1697 •TS8K'- INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NQ. VARIANCE LOG •PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME. PAGE DATE: nr .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) ^ * ~ , _x^ /7 _^ x^x^A^^ -^ ~<?C4£*( v •^^ C-k.1* l/Ct / zh& ^yO, ^S ^ s*^^ /) / r. , / . ^ APPUCABLE DOCUMENT: / ,3?^. ^ ' CC: REQUESTED APPROVED Quality AHMrane* Ofltow DATE: . DATE: . 40MW-7 TUT INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO.. VARIANCE LOG -PROJECT NO. .-tv? '.-•£•• * . ".' ' d; PRQJECT NAME PAGE HATF- oF .VARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) /^s APPUCABLE DOCUMENT: &*^i*<je<fZ<:a£jf*i sw CC: REQUESTED APPROVED Uoiogw Quality AMurancw Offle«r .DATE:,, .DATE:. .DATE:. 40M1»-7 TUT O07 1&99 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION VARIANCE NO VARIANCE LOG PROJECT NO. PROVJECT NAME ARIANCE (INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION) T/t-e . JUL, —£we/*v Ul suL<U APPUCABLE DOCUMEN: REQUESTED RY» APPROVED BYr 40M1>-7 TUT OO7 1700 VALIDATED ANALYTICAL RESULTS KN/WPA890/WP1890.TXT/05-10-»(7rfOpmyD2/El -, ( ,-,- 1701 Environmental Services Memorandum To: Belinda Price - IT, Knoxville Date: April 10,1995 From: Teri Jackson - Quanterra, Knoxville Subject: L'Henri Data Validation Summary Quanterra Project Number: 4481242 Level IV validation has been completed by Quanterra-FAS. Data validation was performed using the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) "National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (1994)". Specifically, the following data were reviewed: _________PARAMETER__________MATRIX # SAMPLES VOAbyGC/MS Soil 22 EPA CLP OLM01.8 Water 1 _____________________________Blanks______4_____ VOA = Volatile Organic Analysis GC/MS = Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry EPA = Environmental Protection Agency CLP = Contract Laboratory Program The following paragraphs highlight the key findings of this validation effort: I. Volatile Organic Analyses (VOA) by GC/MS Data qualifier were applied to the data for the following factors: 1. High Percent Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) - The %RSD for chloroethane exceeded 30% in one initial calibration. Associated chlorethene results were qualified as estimated (J, UJ). TUT 007 1702 Belinda Price <$iiaittem _^ _ knvinvtrmtntvl *n«K April 10,1995 2. High Response Factor (RF) - Some continuing calibration checks indicate that chloroemethane, 2-butanone, acetone and vinyl chloride exceeded the percent difference (%D) criteria (>25%). Associated results were qualified as estimated (J, UJ). 3. Blank Contamination - Several compounds were detected in the method blanks, trip blanks, field blanks and equipment rinsates. The "5x/10x Rule" was applied and associated sample results less than five/ten times the blank concentration were qualified as non-detect (U). 4. Dilations - Several samples reported tetrachloroethene results exceeding the calibration range in the original sample. Dilutions were run and the tetrachloroethene result should be reported from the diluted analysis. 5. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSP) - No MS/MSD was reported with this package. There was no requent for the lab to run a MS/MSD on this project Batch quality control (QC) analysis can be pulled if needed. 6. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) - TICs have been qualified as "NJ" for presumptive evidence of a material present at an estimated concentration. Full details of the validation may be found in the report entitled, "Data Validation: Volatiles by GC/MS", located in Attachment A. The raw data packages will be returned to you for your use and maintenance in the project file. We will maintain in our files, copies of this summary and the individual validation reports. Please let me know if you have any questions. Attachments cc: John Ragsdale, w/o attachment FAS Project Files TUT 007 1703 Attachment "A" KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/l)5-n-95(3KHi»nyKt/El TUT OO7 17'J4 Ermmam-ntil Srrncvs Quartern* incorporated 5815 Middlebrook Pike Knaxvtile, Tennessee 37921 615 588-6401 Telephone 615 584-4315 Fax March 9, 1995 BELINDA PRICE IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE 312 DIRECTORS DRIVE KNOXVILLE, TN 37923 Re: L'HENRY r.o. = Dear BELINDA PRICE: This confirms the receipt of samples for analysis on March 9, 1995 at our QUANTERRA-KNOXVILLE laboratory. These samples were received in good -cndition unless otherwise noted on an attached Condition Upon Receipt variance form. The samples were logged into our tracking system c Work Order =3034. Please review the attached outline for samples receivec and test assignments for any discrepancies. If you discover any problems plsase call me at (615) 588-6401. We appreciate the opportunity to support your analytical requirements. Your" "report will be sent to you at the above address on or before Mar~r. -0, 1995 unless advised otherwise. Aca in, if you have any questions or comments on our performance, pi ear--: feel free to call me at (615) 588-6401. Sincerelv, REBECCA CHARLES Pro-iecc Manager QUAfrTERRA - KNOXVILLE TUT 007 3.705 March 9, 1995 _ Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Project: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS work Order #: 3034 Client- Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description ITSEOi-05.0 AE5074 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) ITSEQi-10.0 AE5075 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) ITSB01-14.5 AE5076 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) EXSOI • AE5077 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) EXSnz AE5078 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) EXS02 AE5079 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) El-ISO.: AE5080 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) EXSG5 AE5081 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) TE030--95 AE5082 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) REPORT DELIVERABLE-COA (CERTIFICATE) TUT 007 1706 •tVhte: To accompany samples Yellow: Reld co See back of form for special instructions. INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ProjectName L ' ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD (cont.J* ,i i .. <rt', c, I. v«, Project No. '/<' V & ~$O. <-£>'£... Reference Document No.30 <75o Page Z of 2^ Samples Shipment Date 3/7/95 ^^^^f^^^^^^m ONE CONTAINER PER LINE ^^^^^^^^^ Sample 14 Sample 15 Number Description/Type TRif>i*fe^5 kl/41 & l> f L Date/Time16 Collected l.'( /V5 / / i <yf> •J;-j. 4 Container1 ' Type ,'J..-.-. (( >'ttrj ' » \1 V : rf i Sample 18 Volume 2. x V^/»(/ •'• -. r Pre-19 servative ;; , & Requested Testing 20 Program <-'^/ J //^^.. 3/#- .." Condition on 21 Receipt .'• •' ' , / . • • • ' • , ' r A- ' /• ' Disposal 22 Record No. \ L_H -4 Environmental Services Quanterra Incorporated 5815 Middiebrook Pike Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 615 588-6401 Telephone 615 584-4315 Fax March 13, 1995 BELINDA PRICE IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE 312 DIRECTORS DRIVE KNOXVILLE, TN 37923 Re: L' HENRY P.O. # Dear BELINDA PRICE: This confirms the receipt of samples for analysis on March 13, 1995 at our QUANTERRA- KNOXVILLE laboratory. These samples were received in good condition unless otherwise noted on an attached Condition Upon Receipt variance form. The samples were logged into our tracking system as Work Order #3067. Please review the attached outline for samples received and test assignments for any discrepancies. If you discover any problems please call me at (615) 588-6401. We appreciate the opportunity to support your analytical requirements. Your report will be sent to you at the above address on or before March 25, 1995 unless advised otherwise. Again, if you have any questions or comments on our performance, please feel free to call me at (615) 588-6401. Sincerely, REBECCA CHARLES Pro j ect Manager QUANTERRA - KNOXVI LLE TUT 007 f————X. March 13, 1995 Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Project: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS Work Order #: 3067 Client Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description E X S 2 3 ~ AE5446 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS24 AE5447 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW .VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS25 AE5448 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS26 AE5449 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS27 AE5450 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS28 AE5451 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS29 AE5452 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS30 AE5453 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS EXS31 AE5454 DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) TUT OO7 171O March 13, 1995 Client: Project: Client ID: LIMS Work Order # Client Sample ID EXS31 EXS32 EXS33 EXS34 EXS35 EXS27DU TB-MAR9-95 EQUIPMENT RINSE FB-MAR9-95 IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE L'HENRY L'HENRY 3067 Lab ID QC AE5454 AE5455 AE5456 AE5457 AE5458 AE5459 AE5460 AE5461 AE5462 Test Description CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL {NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLM01) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) TUT 007 1711 March 13, 1995 Client: IT ENGINEERING SERVICES - KNOXVILLE Proj ect: L'HENRY Client ID: L'HENRY LIMS Work Order #: 3067 Client Sample ID Lab ID QC Test Description FB-MAR9-95 AE5462 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS DCW-MAR10-95 AE5463 CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILES (VOA) (OLM01) DISPOSAL - CHEMICAL (NON PCB/DIOXIN) CLP 90/91 SOW VOLATILE(VOA) TIC'S(OLMOl) CLP-LIKE DATA PKG, GCMS TESTS TUT GO7 1712 I M INTERNATIONAL M TECHNOLOGY J CORPORATION '0003546 So, | Project Name/No. Sample Team Members Profit Canter No. Project Manager4 S*|»vier< Purchase Order No.6 Required Report Date 113/^5/^5 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Samples Shipment Date 7 1 Lab Destination Lab Contact 9 Project Contact/Phone 128P^ Carrier/Waybill No.13 Page 1 of Bill to s XT (jpr jib. 4 \ Ji**' ~3ttl Report to: 10X"T 312- u»r*A-"»rrs- unv «K»Kt/.'ll«v^ 3792.3 Special Instructions: 23 Possible Hazard Identification: 24 Non-hazard £| Flammable «J Skin Irritant J| Poison B 'Jj Unknown ' J| Sample Disposal: 25 *x Return to Client !J Disposal by Lab/5J[ Archive (mo H C o Turnaround Time Required: 26 Normal M RushJ Date: '3 I0H5 Time: """~~ QC Level:2? I.'J II. J III.J Project Specific [specify!: 1 . Relinquished by (Sgnature/AHiliationl . 1. Received by 28 ISignatore/Affiliation) Date: &//S/JJ Time: 2. Relinquished by (Signature/Affiliation) Date: Time: 2. Received by (Signature/Affiliation) Date: Time1 3. Relinquished by (Signature/ Affiliation) Date: Time: -sf~ 7, 3. Received by (Signature/Affiliation) p»- Date: Time' Comments:29 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ANALYSIS REQUEST AND Reference Document No."' CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD (cont.J* Page_7_of Z Project Name L R.£*vt.<*'i*-4.'^«t Project No *{0<f &3& • 0C&L. Samples ShipinRtit Dfilr* Of\JE CONTAINER PER LINE Sample ' * Number Sample '5 Description/Type Date /Time Collected 1(i Container TVP« ' ' Sample tn Volume Pr0-19 •amative Requested Testing 20 _____Program____ Condition on ?< «•"»»* Disposal " Record No. £^651 il-fi' l^ZL & e 5::li tfc f Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page_7_ of DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY QC/MS (CLP) Project Name: L Number: QC Level: Lab ID: Report No; Number and Type of Samples; Special Instruaions: I) Holding Times Field Sample No. Matrix Date Collected Preservation Analysis Date Comments Lzr&3o>mr / / Notes: Recommended Action: Reviewed By/Due; QA •UT O07 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page of /Q instrument Performance: Bromofluorobenzene (BFB1 Standard Check if'OK* BFBRun Date GC/MS ID Form VA Data Prwentf- -Tnnacribed? Significut Fi|ure»? Ratio CatcuUtkNu? Backgnund Subtnakxu? Meets Specifications? Comment Recommended Action: Hi) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form VIA present? ffr*~ 1. Calculation Check - Mean RRF (minimum 1 compound per calibration) Agree with Lab Report" 2. Any Mean RRF < 0.05 ? (If •yes'then tot:) o: .HI Rrnwioo 3 TUT O07 1716 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Of Ill) Calibration (Continued) * A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check • % RSO (Minimum 1 compound per calibration, may use same as tor mean RRF) Calibration Date 4.Any%RSD>30%? Compound GC/MS ID (If -yes' then list;) Calibration Date Percent RSD Comments Recommended Action: B) Continuing Calibration Form VIIA present? f&- 1. Any RRF < 0.05? (If-yes* then Bit): TUT 007 1717 IVolatiles by GC/MS • CLP i Ml) Calibration (Continued) Continuing Calibration (Continued) * 2. Calculation Check - % D^ (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Page ^ of / 0 3. Any % D > 25% ? (If "y«" then Bst) I Standard Filename CalibratkMi Date Compound %D Recommended Actiom: - J Reviewed By/D.ie: QACoacumaoeyDMe: TUT CO 7 17163 Volatiles by GO/MS - CLP Page *r" of _ _ / O Blanks 1. Form IV A present? 2. Method blank reportedjor each matrix, concentration level, GC/MS system as appropriate? If no, explain: __________________________________________ 3. Any common lab contaminants detected? (#4 (if "yes" then 1st:) Blank ID V/8eKde&l% v&^Aeozr? GC/MS ID £*&?A jrsfcpd Date Run 3//vter a/jrM" Concentration (specify units) Methylene Chloride ^aliKe, i j V Acetone fufctVCs jf J ' Toluene 2-butanone 4. Other TCLs or TICs detected? Blank ID GC/MS ID •>r Date Run y<Q (If -yes' then list:) Compound C-T Concentration (specify units) 5. Any contaminants detected in FB, TB, or ER samples? | Blank ! ID Date Collected Methylene Chloride nitration (specify units) Acetone Toluene Other (specify) Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to "ND" based on associated lab blank «'•*•""•**'"'* in Section IV. S. Recommended Actions V) Surrogate Recovery 1. Form IIA present? Entries agree with raw data? All samples listed?. (If *no* for any answer explain below.) Reviewed By/Date: QA CoociuvuM/DUf / OIAMt TUT OO7 17i9 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page of V) Surrogate Recovery (Continued) 2. Any runs with one (1) or more recoveries outside limits? Sample ID Surrogate Compound —Original % Recovery Re-Run % Recovery Air method blank surrogates within limits? (If "yes" then list:) (If'no' explain below:) Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates 1 . Number of pairs analyzed: Matrix: Frequency. 2. Form 111 A present? A/A soil water/ ree with ra % R, RPD Calculations OK? 3. Ail % R, RPD within limits? Results entries gree with raw data? (Ifwf then Use) AJ/A Sample ID Spike Compound %R MS/MSD Comments *•**< j. .K. *t»»iooJ-» TUT 007 1720 ^Volatites by GC/MS - CLP Page "7 of /O VII) Field Duplicates - 1 . Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? (if -yes' then list:) Matrix ^ ^ Original Sample No. ^s" \^s^ Duplicate^, SamjtkrtfoT s^^sivfor Matrix Original Sample No. No. 2. Overall frequency: 3. Comments (Evaluate RPDs for positive ^ VIII) Internal Standards Performance 1 . Form VIIIA present? : Areas/RT agree with raw data? 2. All sample/blank IS areas within limits? List exceptions: 3. All sample/blank IS RTs within 30 seconds of standard IS RT? List exceptions: Reviewed By/Date QACoacmicnec/Dtic TUT OO7 1721 Volatiles by GO/MS-CLP Page of I O JX) Compound Identification and Quantitation Check if'yes* Sample Number ^SD 1 •"•v / / / / / Compound and Result Reported (Form'1 A) A!\ W.-Vx ckaeL-Jl / / / / / / / / / \S RT Match l^ / / 7 Spectra Match 4S>^\ / / / Calculatioi OK — £—- / / / Qualified Result (if different) Comments / / / / / /#" / Z HO fif / / / \s \ 1 j 1 1 • Recommended Actioa: Reviewed By/Diic / Ol.tHl «ou.onJ-4 TUT 007 1722 VolatilesbyGC/MS-CLP Page ^ of (X) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have all peaks that should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? 2. Any TICs found In samples also in associated blanks? 3. Are reasonable identifications reported? 4. Any TCL compounds reported as TICs? Recommended Action: XI) System Performance Check for and explain any of the following: 1. Abrupt RIC baseline shift ___ 2. High background or RT shifts: ___ 3. Baseline rise at high temperature: 4. Extraneous peaJe* ___ 5. Loss of peak rtetajtion: 6. Peak tailing or i Recommeade4 Actiom: ReviewedBv/Dwe: (( WK**- DO'/^J QA •1/1*91 TUT OO7 172 Volatiies by GC/MS - CLP Page /O of /£> XIH Overall Assessment /• «? 3, &&Kt£^K- ~ > 25% \^' ^ A *& Reviewed Bv/Date: QAConcuntnee^at TUT O07 1724 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Ca_se No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01 SDG NO.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulf ide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_._______ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibroraochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2 -Tr ichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2 ——————Bromof orm_________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 2 11 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 280 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U BJ U U U U U U U J U U U U U Uu_ E_ U U U U U U FORM I VOA \/ TUT OO7 1725 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _Q Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXSOl SDG No.: EXSOl Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.Q Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1726 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01DL SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG I.CTJ (uL) 74-87-3 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2- ———— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— / O _ 7 j j «-— — • 71-55-6 ————— K d *5 *5 C 75-27-4 ————— *7 O O*7 C 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— "" 7 K *> K *^ 127-18-4 ----- 79-34-5 ————— i no _Q a_i _____ 100-41-4 ----- 100-42-5 ———— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1 , l-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) —— Chloroform —— 1,2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Bromodichloromethane —— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene XXT XWllXwjL wt_t wlltS Jlc —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane — Benzene —— trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2 -Hexanone X6 ui clwilXw-L (Jc£ wilcric.: —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 21 21 21 21 2 9 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 140 21 21 21 21 21 21 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 007 1727 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil /water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS01DL SDG No.: EXS01 % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _ 0 Lab Sample ID: AE5077 Lab File ID: AE5077D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1728 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS02 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5078 Lab File ID: AE5078 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l, l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————l, 1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2 ———————Bromof orm_______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-9 0-r7-——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 2 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 18 12 12 12 12 120 12 12 12 \Z * 12 3 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U _ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U* UJ OUT 3. I 3/90 TUT 007 1729 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNC Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS02 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5Q78 Lab File ID: AE5078 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1730 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS03 SDG No.: EXSQ1 Lab Sample ID: AE5079 Lab File ID: AE5079 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1,0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroe thane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4——————Br omod ich lor ome thane_________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3 -Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform___________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3———————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 1 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 54 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) I/ ISM 13i U. FORM I VOA TUT 007 1731 3/90 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS03 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5079 Lab File ID: AE5079 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: _____.(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC >/90 TUT 007 1732 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. b Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l,1,l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01—6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4 ——————Ethy Ibenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 1 12 12 12 2 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 270 12 1 12 12 12 12 J U U U BJ BJ U U U U U - U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U IT FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT O07 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1,_o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG GAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1734 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3.Q (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04DL SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.p Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-09-2 ————— -7 er 1 tt r* -7 c 1 C A 75-34-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— £•?_ £_. _•}__ — — — — 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 75-27-4 ————— *7 Q Q *7 C 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— / ^ — ^Q"-^1*"1"""-"1""- 108-10-1 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 1 no _Q Q _i _____ 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Chloromethane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride — —Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1 , 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Tr ichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride . —— Broraodichloromethane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1, 2 -Tr ichloroethane —— Benzene —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4 -Methyl - 2 -Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethylbenzene —— Styrene —— Xylene (total) 20 20 20 20 20 9 20 20 20 20 3 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 100 20 20 20 20 20 20 U U U U U BDJ U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U^ D U U U U U U ByOo \ /0<7 &f* \ FORM I VGA 3/90 TUT 007 173 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. /""""NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3. 0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS04DL SDG NO.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5080 Lab File ID: AE5080D Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 •TUT 007 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS05 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5Q81 Lab File ID: AE5081 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————l,l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————l, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————l, l, 2-Tr ichloroethane____ 71-43-2 ——————-Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform__________________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 2 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 100 12 12 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA Uu Uu BJ BJ U U U U U U " U U U U U U U U Uu u u u u u u u u u u 3/90 TUT 007 1737 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS05 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5081 Lab File ID: AE5081 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 T!T 007 1738 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. T.,ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01050 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5074 Lab File ID: AE5074 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform_______________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene___________ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 3 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 120 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U . U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 130 LftU. \/ FORM I VOA 3/90 rUT 1739 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. "Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01050 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5074 Lab File ID: AE5074 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q TUT 007 174O FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01100 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5075 Lab File ID: AE5075 GAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Tri chloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene___________________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform___________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1/2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 3 17 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U BJ U " U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 1741. IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01100 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5075 Lab File ID: AE5075 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q TUT 007 1/42 FORM I VOA-TIC /90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Contract: LHENRI ITSB01145 Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 SAS No.: SDG No.: EXS01 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. __J> GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Lab Sample ID: AE5076 Lab File ID: AE5076 Soil Extract Volume: GAS NO. (UL) Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9 ———————Br omomethane___________ 75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone___________________ 71-55-6——————l,l,l-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloroprope'ne_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——.———Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 1 6 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 1743 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS^KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G ___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. __ 6 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ ITSB01145 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5076 Lab File ID: AE5076 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/14/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER =======:=:======:== COMPOUND S! S£ S^SSSC SESS — - L; =— ' - :— ^E £SS£ ZSZ --_ NAME RT EST. CONC. ======:=:=:=:=:=:== Q TUT OO7 1744 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 53.0 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TB030695 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5082 Lab File ID: AE5082 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/15/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(uL) 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane___- 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Tri chloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_.____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l ,1,2,2-Tetr achlor oethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 10 2 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 10 10 i- FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT' OO7 1745 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3034 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 53.0 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TB030695 SDG No.: EXS01 Lab Sample ID: AE5082 Lab File ID: AE5082 Date Received: 03/09/95 Date Analyzed: 03/15/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC.* Q fur FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page /_ of DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MS (CLP) Project Name: Number: QC Level: Lab ID; Report No: Number and Type of Samples: Special Instructiom: I) Holding Times Field Sample No. Matrix Date Cottected Preservation Analysis Date Comments 3-IZ- A7 Notes: Recommettded Actioa: f - •TUT 007 1747 Reviewed Bv/Date: QA Concurrence/Date: Voiatiies by GC/MS - CLP Page of __ DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MS (CLP) Project Name: Number QC Level: Lab ID: Special Instructions: Repon No: Number and Type of Samples: 1) Holding Times Field Sample No. Matrix £X5?3 ; Ss TL- ' £Y*53ij £.y53$ f%rn4*.i ei5 T&atiGyS i \ jj% i •^C ^ ii i | .' / Notes: !/£•#*'/*> /•" •fit$A Date Collected j,<^_ f^ \ 3-ci j -35 Preservation £e>£>! &aC- \/ cxvlft'iltfoe ttffiO'c /ItCf Analysis Date J'/?-^ •Z-iy-tjS 3-l$-*l5 3-2l~-e%S ?-z/- f-S^ Comments >cvr Yict*,d ^ 0*C- t*r Recommeaded Action: Reviewed By/Due; QAC Ot :W1 RCVIIIOR > TUT 307 17*8 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page -3 of Instrument Performance: Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) Standard Check if'OK* BFB Run Date GC/MS ID 12- J5'"^ 1*j '• ^Tfit&A M-ll-lZ 4 'Pl-itf-jfi •! | ig-fG - ^ 5' i v t/5-i^-^i^ ! (JS^^f 0^-2("^l^ i i , i vl/ Form V A Preaent^ i/ * I/ i/ j \S \S Data Transcribed? iX i^ i/ tx */ ^ Significant Figures? s i/' ts ^ •(, '>/ Ratio Calculations? ^ i,' i^ >^ I," f Background Subtractions? ..,.„,«•' -,._ ts U^ l^- _, iS^ r Meets Specifications? \S f t^ IS' f Comment Recommended Action: III) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form VIA present? L/< 1. Calculation Check - Mean RRF (minimum 1 compound per calibration) Calibration GC/MS ID Ref. Matrix Fik&ame Mean RRF Agree with Lab Report ? 2. Any Mean RRF < 0.05 ? ft (If-yes1 then list:) ' Compound 1 ! 1 " ^-^~~~^~~ \ ^^ Mean RRF L_-— •— GOMS ID _- —— -~^' — — — " Calibration Date __^^— — -" r^X^< ^_ — - """" Comments . Reviewed By/Date: QA Concurrence/Date: TUT 007 1749 Volatiles by QC/MS • CLP Pagey of Ill) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSD Calibration Date tf//f/9 V 'S/Sfffaf 5/W/55" GC/MS ID X'Sccfc XCfccrf- PS&? A 4. Any % RSD > 30%? Compound Gti**a$vL*' — '^- -^ ————— (Minunum I compound per calibration, may use same as for mean RRF) Compound ^fygjirfuji*^ fiCwnw^l^ ao/tjv*- Percent RSD 6>l 6'$" 577 Agree with Lab Report ? M» L*a 1 —————— |K± ———————— ^ (Ifves' then list) GC/MS ID Q&pfi r-——— ^ Calibration Date 3//o/*'T ^~~~~~* Percent RSD 32*f ^-~-~~~ Comments ——— - —— — T — *r- yAAs" Recommended Action: B) Continuing Calibration Form VIIA present? 1. Any RRF < 0.057 Standard FUename (If "yes* then list): Calibration Date GC/MS ID Compound Reviewed By/Date: QACo TUT OO7 1750 Volatiles by GC/MS • CLP Page jS of Ill) Calibration (Continued) < /*" N- B) Continuing Calibration (Continued) 2. Calculation Check - % D ^ Standard Filename WiP^/7 VOSO^^Dg uXSO 3i9 QS Q5A\ Ref. (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Calibration Date / 3/0/5T S/jtrfS" 3//«?/^ 3/di/ 79,5 3. Any % D > 25%? f~* ^m" Standard Filename , \f- 7 Q V ^--^ ^^ ^* Calibration Date 3//?Av N 3/^f/^-r ^ •>J - I/ ^^ ^*^ ^ GC/MS ID XSfcpjfl- 3^5 ooA •ars"A)A cfcfi^/4 ^ Compound fx***~n&s»u>- c^^ro/naiisj«_ l/i'n*.l rU^r^«k»- >A^ ^CSJT-NjL •^ (If -yes' then list) Compound fj(Ci»VU>uJ*-4^ do^w i J-rbJUfUL. foJ6** \ „! -faJte,n$ ^ ^^^"^ ^*<^*' ^^^ •flsfcf ^p %D 32. r ^' V sj[ 7* i j /' C? £/r? -^ T p ***^^ ^^^^ % D ! Agree with Lab Report ? 2»f,3 /^j. "5"i5 Vj,!^ ^ (B ^^ -S"M» 4^^ i ^ Recommended Actioa: -& ^ Reviewed By/D»te: QA / 01AW1 Rjvwen 3-< TUT OO7 1751 Volatiles by GO/MS - CLP Page of IV) Blanks 1. Form IV A present?_ 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concentration level, GC/MS system as appropriate? lu& If no, explain: """ ______________________________________ 3. Any common lab contaminants detected? ^if "yes" then ust:i Blank ID COMS ID Date Run Methyiene Chloride Concentration (specify units) Acetone Toluene 2-butanone 4. Other JCLa or T\Cs detected? Blank ID V COMS ID x/ Date Run** (ifyes- then list:) Compound Concentration (specify units) . 5. Any contaminants detected in FB, TB, or Blank ID Date Collected Methyiene Chloride Concentration (specify units) Acetone 3J Totoene Other (specify) Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to "ND" based on associated lab blank contamination in Section IV. 5. Recommended Actioa: V) Surrogate Recovery 1. Form IIA present? _ Entries agree with raw data? All samples listed?_ ffoer (If'no* for any answer explain below:) Reviewed By/Dite: QACo —jr. TUT 007 175? Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP of W Surrogate Recovery (Continued! 2. Any runs with one (1) or more recoveries outside limits? (If yes'then list:) Sample ID Surrogate Compound ^Original % Recovery Re-Run % Recovery Ail method blank surrogates within limits? Comments (If'no* explain below:) Recommended Action: VI) Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates 1. Number of pairs analyzed: '*Ma$ Fre< 2. Form III A pres % R, RPD Calcul 3. All % R, RPD within limits? agree with raw data? (If 'no' then tot:) Sample ID Spike gotnpound % MS/MSD RPD Comments Recnnnended Action r. fcfcK OCL ^ if r*J*& . ° Reviewed By/Date: QACo TUT 007 1753 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page of VII) Field Duplicates _ 1 . Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable?. Matrix ^s' ^ Original Sample No. ^^ ^s^ ^^^ Duplicate^, Sampkrlm ^ (if -yes- then list:) Matrix ^* ^ Original Sample No. ^^ ^^^ Duplicate Sample No^ _^J-**^ 2. Overall frequency: 3. Comments (Evaluate RPDs for positive paired analytes): VIII) Internal Standards Performance 1 . Form VIIIA present? : Areas/RT agree with raw data? 2. All sample/blank IS areas within limits? List exceptions: 3. All sampte/blank IS RTs within 30 seconds of standard IS RT? List exceptions: Reviewed By/Due: QACo Ol/llffl Rcvwon J-' TUT 007 175. Voiatiies by QC/MS - CLP Page °{ of IX) Compound Identification and Quantitation Check if 'yes' / Sample Number j/ J / / / / Compound and Result Reponed (Form I A) y / / / / / / / / / / / RT Match / / / / Spectra Match / / / Calculation OK y / / Qualified Result (if different) / / / fr / flsftf / / / / Recommended Action* TMWUM- &M&tfw WT <0WM ^7 (tyftw( <fa*LkMA L_^ Reviewed By/Date / jfflji, ftjI'J QA CoBOBiwodDtte: /f^e^*" ^(^fo^^- *f~5f/C. Vx- / 01,11*1 Rewon)-* PUT 007 1755 Volatiles by QC/MS - CLP Page /O of (X) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have all peaks that should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? ——————— ————— iff 6 ————————————— 2. Any TICs found in samples also in associated blanks? _ 3. Are reasonable identifications reported? 4. Any TCL compounds reported as TICs? Rccommended Action: XI) System Performance Check for and explain any of the following: 1. Abrupt RIC baseline shift ___ 2. High background or RT shifts: ___ 3. Baseline rise at high temperature:___ 4. Extraneous pietex ___ 5. Loss of peak nmJutfon: _____f 6. Peak tailing or Recommendcd Acttoa: Reviewed By/Due t**&WL V/3/vi QA Coacuncace/Due: 007 1756 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP PageJJ_ of Xil) Overall Assessment i r- •> ?0?e - tf J" <&& o&d Reviewed Bv/Daie: Q A Concurrence/Date: 007 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET SPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTO Case Mo.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 'WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ____ DCWMAR1095 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5463 Lab File ID: AE5463 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____5.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane___,__________ 74-83-9 ——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1, l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_____________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, l-Trichloroethane_______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane^________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane___________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene_________________________ 10061-02-6-———trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———«——Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene ________________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 6 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 J Uu Uu BJ U U U U UU BJ U U U U U U U U Uuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 1758 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. /—<xLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ DCWMAR1095 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5463 Lab File ID: AE5463 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____5.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1759 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 1EATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EQUIPMENTRIN SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5461 Lab File ID: AE5461R CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1,0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 7 5-00-3 ——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride """ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_____ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________________ 124-48-1——————D ibr omoch lor omethane_______ 79-00-5——————l, i, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43 -2 ——————Benzene ___________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________________ 108-9 0-7 ——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 101 4 1 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ JuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 176O IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, /•—<Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab code: T.TSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) -«>J Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EQUIPMENTRIN SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5461 Lab File ID: AE5461R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1761 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE___________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS23 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride """ 67-64-1——————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, i-Tr ichloroethane_______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5———————l, 1,2 -Tr ichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————-Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene ______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_____________________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 32TT TT 12 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) T I2.U FORM I VOA s 3/90 TUT 007 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. /«»—JLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS23 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 17&3 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Contract: LHENRI EXS23DL Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 SAS No. : SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_____________ 74-83 -9 ——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride__________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2 ——————Benz ene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_______________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 60 60 60 60 12 22 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 290 60 60 60 60 60 60 Q U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA TUT 007 1764 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) Q _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS23DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5446 Lab File ID: AE5446D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT O07 1765 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G. _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS24 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5447 Lab File ID: AE4557R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————Chlor omethane__________ 74-83 -9 ———————Br omomethane__________________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone __________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4 ———————Br omodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene______________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43 -2 ———————Benzene _________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4 ——————Tetr achloroethene_____________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene____________________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 3 9 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 21 12 1 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U Uy U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U uu / -U VT 3/90 TUT 007 1766 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G. _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (ma) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _ p. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS24 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5447 Lab File ID: AE4557R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ' .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT O07 1767 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /<—vLa'b Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS25 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5448 Lab File ID: AE5448 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane_______________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride ~" 67-64-1——————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Tr i chloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene____________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane______ 71-43 -2 ——————Benzene_____ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromof orm____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4—————-Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 114 13 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 190 11 11 11 11 11 11 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 3/90 UT 1768 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS25 SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5448 Lab File ID: AE5448 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _____.(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q TUT 007 1769 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS26 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone ___________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane___________ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___________ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75-25-2——————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_________________________ 127-18-4-;—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_____ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_______________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)___________ 12 12 12 12 5 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 800 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U FORM I VOA i TUT 007 1770 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: •_____ EXS26 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT O07 1.771 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS26DL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) §OIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ..._ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromome thane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone____________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27 -4 ———————Br omodichlor omethane_____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5—-——cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5—•—————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43 -2——————Benzene_____________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene ____• 100-41-4-—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 60 60 60 60 60 37 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 300 60 60 60 60 60 60 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) FORM I VOA 3/9° TUT 007 177; IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 16 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS26DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5449 Lab File ID: AE5449D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 PUT 007 1773 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: lysTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone____________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————l, l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———-———Benzene_______ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-——————Bromoform_________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene________________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 4 26 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 12 12 12 12 980 12 4 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA Q U U U U BJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U J U U Uu <*">». T lost I !«•» VI 4 3/90 TUT 007 1774 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) §b!L Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 1.8. GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER 1. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN RT 16.40 EST. CONC. 6 Q J FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1775 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) ^SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI EXS27DL SAS No. SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AES450 Lab File ID: AE5450D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane_________________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone _______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________. 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene____________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43 -2 ——————Benzene ____________________________ 10061-02-6-————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-——————Bromoform______________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene____________ 79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 61 61 61 61 16 38 61 61 61 61 61 61 7 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 850 61 61 61 61 61 61 FORM I VOA U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U DJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 3/90 TUT 007 J.776 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: TTSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) -SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G._ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _Q Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5450 Lab File ID: AE5450D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1777 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS27DU SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water)"SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: i.o CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane______________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_________ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————l, 1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane___________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5——————i, i, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1/1/2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene _______ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_____________ 12 12 12 121 25 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 790 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U Uu BJ U U U U U Uuuuuuuu uJuuuu FORM I VGA TtT 3/90 TUT 007 1778 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. ,,*—*Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ Number TICs found: _1 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DU SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER 1. 104-76-7 COMPOUND NAME 1-HEXANOL, 2-ETHYL- RT 16.37 EST. CONC. 17 Q JN ^ n* FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1779 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET /-""NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTO Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EPA SAMPLE NO. EXS27DUDL SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) g_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1,0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone ___________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane___________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane__________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2 ——————Benzene __________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone________________ 127-18-4-—————Tetrachloroethene_____________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 59 59 59 59 12 23 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 570 59 59 59 59 59 59 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Uu D TTuuuuu .(UL) Or- FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 178O IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No. : 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) £ _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ Number TICs found: _ 0. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS27DUDL SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5459 Lab File ID: AE5459D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT' OO7 1781 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: |TAS-KNOXVILLE I LetO Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS28 SDG No.: DCW Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL m Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451 Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———«——Bromomethane_________' 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride________ 75-00-3—•———•—Chloroethane________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1—————Acetone ____________ 75-15-0—————Carbon Bisulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3—•————-2-Butanone___________ 71-55-6——————1, l, l-Trichloroethane___ 56-2 3 -5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6-———•——Trichloroethene_____^____ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5—————1/1,2-Trichloroethane________ 71-43-2 —————Benzene ___________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———•——Br omof orm_________________________ los-io-i—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene______• 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_____________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 4 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 400 11 11 11 11 11 11 Uu Uu BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U Uuuuuuuuu .(UL) V HUT UCT FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 1782 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) g_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS28 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q TUT O07 1783 FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE______________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) §OIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) S___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS28OL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride """ 67-64-1——————Acetone _________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane__________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane^_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 56 56 56 56 12 19 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 210 56 56 56 56 56 56 U U U U BDJ BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J2__ U U U U .(uL) Qr< FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT CO" 1784 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 10 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _p_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: ______ EXS28DL SDG No. DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5451 Lab File ID: AE5451D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1785 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. ,Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane________________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————l,l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————l, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________. 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochlorome thane_______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene_____________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—•————Bromof orm___________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 5 26 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 610 12 4 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ B U U U U U U BJ U U U U .U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U tt»I I 3/90 TUT 007 17Q6 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) j§_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: Number TICs found: _p. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29 SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: _____.(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1787 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE______________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) g_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29DL SDG NO.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab Pile ID: AE5452D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————D ibr omoch 1 orome thane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-4 3-2 ——————Benzene ___________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene _______ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 59 59 59 59 59 43 59 59 59 59 59 59 8 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 150 59 59 59 59 59 59 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U DJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U D TTu U U U U .(UL) FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT O07 1788 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) ?OIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS29DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5452 Lab File ID: AE5452D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____ l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1789 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. f—NLab Name: TTAS-KNOXVILLE_____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: l.Q (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS30 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5453 Lab File ID: AE5453D Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ______________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone_______ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2 -Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2 ———————Benzene_____ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2 ——————Bromof orm____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4-—————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1/1/2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——•———Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 57 57 57 57 14 17 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 8 57 57 57 57 57 1100 57 57 57 57 57 57 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U U U U U U U .(UL) I/ 57 uI FORM I VOA -itr 3/90 TUT 007 1790 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: TTSTU Case No.: 3067 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: EXS30 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0. (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: Number TICs found: _0 _____ SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5453 AE5453D Lab File ID: _______ Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _____.(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) U6/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 I-?91 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS31 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ___1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ________________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————D ibr omochlor omethane________ 79-00-5———————i, 1, 2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 5 19 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 3 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1300 12 2 12 12 12 12 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U U U UJ U U U U .(UL) I3LU I FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. /—"\Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS31 SDG No. DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454_____ Lab File ID: AE5454 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1793 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: |TSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/ water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: l.Q (g/mL) g _ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS31DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: _____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_____________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————l, l-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————l, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________] 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1, l, l-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene______________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene____________________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 61 61 61 61 61 28 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 560 61 61 61 61 61 61 U U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 007 1794 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS -KNOXVILLE _ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 1.0 (g/mL) G ___ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS31DL SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5454 Lab File ID: AE5454D2 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/19/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/K6 CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1795 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS32 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5455 Lab File ID: AE5455R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.p Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/K6 74-87-3——————Chloromethane______________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone ____________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3 ——————2 -Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2 ——————Benzene ______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________ 11 11 11 11 3 5 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 38 11 4 11 11 11 11 U U U U BJ BJ U U U U Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuu uJuuuu .(UL) nu. IJU iiu. FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT 007 1796 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. /"XLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G._ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 12 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _p_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS32 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5455 Lab File ID: AE5455R Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG7KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1797 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS33 SDG No. : DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5456 Lab File ID: AE5456 GAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane __________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone__i______ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————l, 1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene___ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_________________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone _____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene__________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene ________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 2 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 2 11 11 11 11 31 11 1 11 11 11 11 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U UJ U U U U .(UL) V I \A«JI FORM I VGA TT acr 3J HU . I 3/90 TUT OO7 1793 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. NLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.Q (g/mL) Q_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS33 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5456 Lab File ID: AE5456 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1799 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE____________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS34 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5457 Lab File ID: AE5457 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_______________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene__________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________[ 107-06-2——————l, 2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane-_______ 78-87-5———————l, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane________ 71-43-2 ——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4———•——Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_____________• 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 12 12 12 12 2 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1'2 12 12 170 12 2 12 12 12 12 FORM I VOA U U U U BJ BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U • •"• b*I 3/90 TUT 007 1800 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: ITAS -KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) 5DIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW Contract: LB[ENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS34 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: Lab File ID: AE5457 AE5457 % Moisture : not dec . 14 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _ p_ Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/17/95 Dilution Factor: l.Q Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT OO7 1801 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE_________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) "SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G._ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: _________ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS35 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5458 Lab File ID: AE5458 CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————Chlor omethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane _____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone____________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulf ide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3——•————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane__________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane.________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane_______ 71-43-2——————Benzene______ 10061-02-6————trans-l, 3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform___________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4 ——————Tetrachlor oethene___________ 79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 11 11 11 11 2 19 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4 11 11 11 11 160 11 10 11 11 11 2 U U U U BJ B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U UJ U U U nu w FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 I802 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: I^TAS-KNOXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) £_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 13 GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _Q. Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ EXS35 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5458 Lab File ID: AE5458 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/18/95 Dilution Factor: ____l.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ .(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1803 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: TTAS-KNQXVILLE________ Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ FBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5462 Lab File ID: AE5462 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____i.o Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1——————Acetone_____j_______• 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————i, i, l-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5——————l, 2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane________ 79-00-5——————if l, 2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————trans-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform__________' 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2 -Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuu BJ uuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 18O4 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO, xLab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _0 Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: FBMAR995 ______ SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5462 Lab File ID: AE5462 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: __ 1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(uL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE * Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ (uL) Number TICs found: _p_ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5460 Lab File ID: AE5460 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .(UL) CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 TUT 007 1806 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: ITAS-KNOXVILLE__________ EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Code: ITSTU Case No.: 3067 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ GC Column: RTX624 ID: 0.530 (mm) Soil Extract Volume: ______ Contract: LHENRI SAS No.: _____ TBMAR995 SDG No.: DCW Lab Sample ID: AE5460 Lab File ID: AE5460 Date Received: 03/13/95 Date Analyzed: 03/21/95 Dilution Factor: ____1.0 Soil Aliquot Volume: CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane________________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride 67-64-1———————Acetone __________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________\ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone___________________ 71-55-6——————l, 1, l-Tr ichloroethane_______ 56-23 -5———————Carbon Tetrachloride__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene_____ 10061-02-6————trans-1,3 -Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________ 10 10 10 10 1 4 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ BJ uuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu /Ob1 FORM I VOA 3/90 TUT OO7 1SO7 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WPA890/WP1890.TXT/DS-10-95(7:40pmyt«MEl TUT OO7 18O8 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY REPORT FOR L'HENRI 409830.00200000 APRIL 11, 1995 /——s Environmental Technology Development Center P.O. Box 4339 • 1570 Bear Creek Road • Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 • 615-482-6497 • FAX: 615-482-1890 IT Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary ol International Technology Corporation TUT OO7 18O9 TSSSaZBa" 1 GEOTECHNICAL CORPORATION LABORATORY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Belinda Price April 11, 1995 IT-Knoxville 312 Directors Drive Knoxville, TN 37923 ETDC Project Number: 409830.00200000 Job Number: 409830.00200000 This is the Certificate of Analysis for the following samples: Client Project ID: L' Henri Date Received by Lab: March 10 and March 14, 1995 Number of Samples: Two (2) received, one (1) tested Sample Type: Soil I. Introduction/Case Narrative One soil sample was received by IT/ETDC on March 10, 1995. Requested testing included particle-size analysis, moisture content, permeability, density, porosity and organic content. Additional material was received by IT/ETDC on March 14, 1995 to be used if there was not enough sample quantity to complete testing. Please see Appendix A, Sample Number Cross Reference List; Appendix B, Analysis Results; Appendix C, Chain of Custody and Request for Analysis Records, and Appendix D, Variance Documents for specific sample information. Reviewed and Approved: /JLt ^•i/./V-_____ ^—Be^eriy L. L'eamorf Project Manager, Geotechnical Services TUT 007 1810 _ IT Environmental Technology Development Center P.O. Box 4339 • 1570 Bear Creek Road • Oak Ridge, TN 37830 • 615-482-6497 • FAX: 615-482-1890 esiA*93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11,1995 Cyent Project ID: L' HENRI IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 ETDC Project No.: 409830.00200000 II. Analytical Results/Methodology REFERENCES: American Society for Tesing and Materials (ASTM) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 4.08, Soil and Rock (I); Volume 4.09, Soil and Rock (II). Particle-Size Analysis Moisture Content Permeability Porosity Density Organic Content ASTM D 422 ASTM D 2216 ASTM D 5084 EM-1110-2-1906, App. II EM-1110-2-1906, App. II ASTM D 2974 III. Quality Control Quality control checks such as duplicates and spikes (QC samples), are not normally applicable to geotechnical testing. This is due to the inability of obtaining samples with known characteristics, the heterogenous nature of the samples, and Quality Control procedures built-in to the analytical method. QC measures to ensure accuracy and precision of test results include the following: 100% verification on all numerical results - all raw data entries, transcriptions and calculations entered by lab technicians are checked, recalculated and verified. Most data calculations are performed by computer programs. Data validation through test reasonableness - summaries of ail test results for individual reports are reviewed to determine the overall reasonableness of data and to determine the presence of any data that may be considered outliers. Quality control procedures are built into most standardized geotechnical procedures. For example, many analyses routinely call for a re-analysis, specifying an acceptance criteria. Routine instrument calibration - all instruments, gauges and equipment used in testing are calibrated on a routine basis. All instrument calibration follows ASTM or manufacturer guidelines. 682A-6-93 TUT OO7 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11,1995 Client Project ID: j ETDC Project No. L1 HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 Maintenance of all past calibration records - records and certification documents of all instruments, gauges and equipment are updated routinely and maintained in the Quality Control Coordinators Quality/Operations files. Use of trained personnel for conducting tests - all technicians are trained in the application of standard laboratory procedures for geotechnical analyses as well as the quality assurance measures implemented by IT. IV. Data Qualification Particle-Size Distribution - Initial hydrometer results do not always coincide with the curve established by fine sieve analysis results and are occasionally omitted. Overlapping results may be caused by organic debris, soluble salts, or other contaminants contained in the sample, or turbidity of the soil/water suspension immediately after manual agitation. Incomplete dispersion of the hydrometer soil portion may, likewise, cause initial hydrometer results to appear far below the curve established by the fine sieve results. Not all soils will be dispersed effectively by the methods defined in ASTM D 422. Moisture Content - Moisture contents are calculated in accordance with ASTM D 2216. Given results are based on the sample dry weight, not on the sample wet weight as is common in analytical chemistry. Permeability - Reported results of degree of saturation are based on assumed specific gravity and measured specimen dimensions (EM-1110-2-1906, app. II). For the purposes of initiating permeability testing, saturation is verified by > 0.95 B-coefficient as described in ASTM D 5084. Please also refer to ASTM D 4767, Note 16 for further explanation of the B-parameter and degree of saturation. Please refer to Appendix D, the Variance Report, for specific information regarding the variance record. TUT OO7 682A-643 1812 ATTACHMENT I GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXrA>5-10-9S(7:30pmyn2/El TUT OO7 1813 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: FTDfi Project No L1 HENR! 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 SAMPLE NUMBER CROSS-REFERENCE LIST ETDC SAMPLE NO. CLIENT SAMPLE NO. ETDC-6530 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LH01 ETDC-6537 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LH02 682A-6-93 TUT O07 ATTACHMENT II GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS TUT OO7 KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/05-10-95C7:30pmyD2/El Belinda Price IT-Knoxvilte April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: Pr L' HENRI m IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 PART/OLE SIZE ANAL YSIS ASTMD422 Project Name: L' Henri Project Number: 409830.00200000 Specific Gravity = 2.7765 Measured SIEVE ANALYSIS Client Number: ETOC Number: LH01 ETDC-6530 Moisture Content = 11.8% c 0 A R S E Sieve No. 3" 1.5" 0.75" 0.375" #4 #10 Diameter mm 75.000 37.500 1 9.000 9.500 4.750 2.000 Percent Finer 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 96.9% F I N E Sieve No. #20 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200 Diameter mm 0.850 0.425 0.250 0.149 0.106 0.075 Percent Finer 87.3% 63.0% 46.5% 36.5% 32.3% 28.9% - •DRY SAMPLE BASIS HYDROMETER ANAL YSIS H Y D R O M E T E R Diameter mm 0.04540 0.03248 0.02058 0.01 200 0.00850 0.00607 0.00430 0.00301 0.00130 Percent Finer 22.5% 20.5% 19.8% 17.8% 17.2% 15.2% 12.6% _ — -._. ..._ ._... . . . . . . « 1 !.&';*> 5 9.3% 1 TUT O07 682A-6-93 1816 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 CBent Project ID: Protect No L' HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 100 90 80 70 O ui m Kui u 40 o ui °" 30 20 10 L' Henri 12" U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES r i.r aw aw <w *io 1000 CLIENT SAMPLE NO.: *4O *«0*100*140*200 I | | I I | I HYDROMETER <2oose« 100 10 1 0.1 PARTICLE SIZE, mm 0.01 0.001 0.0001 LH01 ETOC SAMPLE NO.: ETDC-6S30 B O U s E R S ct ... L E S GRAVEL o A R S E F 1 N E SAND co A R S E M E 0 1 U M K 1 N E Oil T *> ^|^ —— ;~ __ ^ _ SILT 2-75 microns CLAY <?. .Mcrtms TUT OO7 1817 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: L' HENRI IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 ETDC Project No.: 409830.002000 MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM D 2216 PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC SAMPLE NO. CLIENT SAMPLE NO. % MOISTURE % SOLIDS ETDC-6530 LH01 11.8 89.4 TUT 181Q 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxviile April 11,1995 Client Project ID: PTTM": Pmiort No L HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615) 482-6497 CONSTANT HEAD PERMEABILITY ASTMD5084 PROJECT NAME: L' Henri CLIENT NO.: LH01 PROJECT NO.: 409830.00200000 ETDC NO.: ETDC-6530 AVG. DIAMETER, CM.: AVG LENGTH, CM.: AVG. AREA, SO. CM.: WATER CONTENT, %: WET UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: DRY UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: DEG. OF SATURATION, %: | INITIAL | | FINAL I 4.8585 4.8963 5.8788 5.7865 18.5394 18.8287 11.8 18.8 129.56 129.61 115.86 109.12 66.2 88.6 SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 2.7765 SPEC. GRAVITY (A OR M)*: M MAX. CONSOLIDATION STRESS, PSI: 7.0 % VOLUMETRIC STRAIN, +/-: 0.03 WET WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, g.: 226.19 PRESSURE GRADIENT, PSI: 5.0 MIN. CONSOLIDATION STRESS, PSI: 2.0 TOTAL BACK PRESSURE, PSI: 15.0 PERMEANT FLUID: •ASSUMED Oil MCASUOED DEIONIZED, DEAIRED WATER IICOEF. OF PERMEABILITY. CM/S: 1.7E-07 II 20.00 - «2 18.00 - 0 1 6.00 - P 14.00 - w 12.00 - X ~ 10.00 - 3 8.00 - < 6.00 - 1 4-00 a! 2.00 - **.•*C| 1. o.oo 1 [ 1 1 315*0 s p U-- p —— —— i —— 131680 SE i 1 i«»-l i —— •Saa F WSi »EIRl\ = ——————— 231680 /IE -- A Bl Lllrv —— . V L— ^S TIM - — E 331660 4316*0 TIME, SECONDS ... — 6316OO ——— 831660 731680 TUT 007 1819 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11,1995 Client Project ID: ETDC Project No. L' HENRI 409830.00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 BULK DENSITY/ DRY DENSITY EM-1110-2-1906, APPENDIX II PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC CLIENT AVERAGE AVERAGE WET MOISTURE BULK DRY SAMPLE SAMPLE LENGTH, DIAMETER. WEIGHT. CONTENT, DENSITY, DENSITY, NUMBER: NUMBER: INCHES: INCHES: GRAMS: %: PCF: PCF: ETDC-6530 LH01 1.9128 2.3145 226.19 11.83 107.09 95.76 682A-6-93 TUT OO7 1620 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: Project No !_' HENRI 409830 00200000 IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 POROSITY/PORE VOLUME/ VOID RATIO/DEGREE OF SATURATION EM-1110-2-1906, APPENDIX II PROJECT NAME: L' Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC CLIENT A PORE DEGREE OF SAMPLE SAMPLE SPECIFIC OR POROSITY, VOLUME. VOID SATURATION. NUMBER: NUMBER: GRAVITY: M": %: CC: RATIO: %: ETDC-653O LHO1 2.7765 M 44.76 59.03 0.81 40.53 "Assumed or measured (for specific gravity) TUT O07 1821 682A-6-93 Belinda Price IT-Knoxville April 11, 1995 Client Project ID: L' HENRI IT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER OAK RIDGE, TN (615)482-6497 ORGANIC & ASH CONTENT ASTM D 2974 PROJECT NAME: L1 Henri PROJECT NUMBER: 409830.00200000 ETDC CLIENT % % % ASH % ORGANIC SAMPLE SAMPLE MOISTURE SOLID (FIXED) (VOLATILE! NUMBER NUMBER CONTENT- CONTENT RESIDUE RESIDUE ETDC-6530 ETDC-6530 DUP. LH01 LH01 8.5 8.5 91.5 91.5 98.5 98.7 1.5 1.3 •MOISTURE CONTENT RESULTS ARE CALCULATED BASED ON A WET WEIGHT BASIS. GIVEN v.VO&TiriBtt: .;C=~<- c.Vk K5?^iifcT5 ASE CALCULATED THE SAME AS CHEMICAL MOISTURE CONTENT. ABOVE RESULTS ARE NOT CALCULATED THE SAME AS GEOTECHNICAL MOISTURE (ASTM D 2216). GEOTECHNICAL MOISTURE CONTENT IS CALCULATED BASED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS. 682A-6-93 TUT 1822 ATTACHMENT III GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS KN/WPfl890/WPimTXTA>5-10-95(8:14pmyD2/El TUT O07 1823 White: To accompany samples Yellow: Field copy See back of form for speciai TUT OO7 1824 y 5815 Middkbrook Pike Kno-villi1. Toniwssc* 37921 . (615)588-6401 ANALYSIS Rk. JUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD* Project Name/No. _L_L Sample Team Members 5jy Profit Center No..3. . ._„__ Samples Shipment Date Z_ . __ Lab Destination *3?r gr.EC, Reference Document l\u. 2230 Page 1 of \ Bill to: 5 J^ Lab Contact 9 tl Project Managenifege^-oLw-|.:*£-____ Project Contact/Phone ^ .._ Purchase Order No. .6_*//t-___.__..._.. _____ Cacrier/Waybill No. 13 fckrMt> Report to: I0 - D) O O - o Tl Ol - (fl 0) l^^^m^H^^S^ttilii^^^^l ONE CONTAINER PER LINE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^B Sample 14 A Number ^Ir5B ^/-t3b._> i / / / / Sample 15 Description/Type \ . Tj £ / I Jf / / Date/Time16 Collected 3/tJW-WK ' x / ^ ——— _ Container Type 41blQ. ' / / / — — — — Special Instructions: 23 5A-«*flA- N°T d^v^^-f^A Possible Hazard Identification: 24 Non-hazard J Flammable J Skin Irritant J Poison B Turnaround-Time Required: 26 Normal id Rush _| ,, Sample18 Volume 3'W X _ >• " Pro- 19 aerwathie *w .-- — ••• — / / ^^ ..-> ^A,^ _J Unknown '*££• Requeated Tasting 20 Program 6-tftffet-L / / / / Condition on 21 Disposal 22 Record No. CTflP/Zr C C 0 *7 C 1 Uu£'fr> D 0 u / • run 't *J' ' r'^»-ii • ' .. I \i-a- :' ;** T s" . ?" (>: > >.•• :,. H\«A^ Sample Disposal: 25 ^ Return to Client J Disposal by Lab iT /-Archive (mos.) QC Level: 27 . J..J II. J 111. j . Project Specific (specify); 1 . Relinquished by 28 n [J —JL*. .Date:. S/l'ih^" . (Signature/Affiliation) iflujinL^ lUffM/* JJ *.£( $&Q£jJ Time: ' 12." 2. Relinquished by/I 7 Date: (Signature/ Affiliation) (x / Time: 3. Relinquished by Date: . (Signature/Affiliation) . Time: 1 . Received by 28 ,• ' Date: 3-i4-e?S~ [Signature/Affiliation} ^MSxu^'-b-^&l (S^OtM Time: /3_£_O 2. Received by / ,/ .,/ Date: g-rf-ff (Signature/Affiliation) ^fa-e*r /^-^7i^^^^^ Time: /'£. ^/^ 3. Received by / Date: (Signature/Affiliation) ^ , c Time' Comments:29 TUT OO7 1 ATTACHMENT IV GEOTECHNICAL TESTING RESULTS TUT 007 1826 KNAW/1890/WP1890.TXTA>S-10-9S(8:14pmyD2/El -*.- ,;:• ;NUJNCUNFORMANGE/VARIANCE REPORT NONCONFORMANCE — i •...- 'or- Project Name ProjectNo. Date Page ) of / Report No. Nonconformance/Variance Description (include requirement violated .._ ._ 'or. A' Identified by Root Cause / Corrective Action (include expected completion date) To be completed by Expected Completion Date Action taken to preclude recurrence To be performed by Expected Completion Date Client notified (include client name, how notified, and response) »cA <x rk; b-\ Notified by C-^L... ^J^ ft^ Date 3- YWokeU*- 1C-is' \ Corrective action corrmleted bv C » w . Q__^ r Corrective action approved by Laboratory Supervisor 3roject Manager Comments IIQAO Approval Date J' Use back of page for additional space. Attach /additional pages if necessary. TUT OO7 1827 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Memorandum To; Ralph Cole °crte: March 16, 1995 From: Beverly L. Leamon Subject: L' Henry: IT-Knoxville I spoke to Becky Charles, Quanterra-Middlebrook, concerning sample numbers for Lf Henri Project. She stated that client number LH01 (shelby tube) is #ITSB01-06.5 and client number LH02 (jar sample)is #ITSB01-08.0. I informed Belinda Price, IT Knoxville, about client number confusion and what Becky Charles informed me. Belinda Price stated that both samples were taken from the same location and should be considered as the same sample (each test should be performed once.). The jar sample (LH02) is considered extra material for grain size, moisture content and organic content to be used if we need additional material. She also stated to perform a grain size sieve with hydrometer. Chain- of-Custody states "sieve". 44-8-85 TUT 007 1828 VWIIILC. *o ououfii^jo*iy ooui^fies i eiiuw. neicicopv •aee oacx of form for special instructions. /~N TUT 007 White: i o accompany samples ! I renow: i-ieto cop see Dactc of torm tor special instructions. TUT OO7 16330 APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXCAVATION PROCESS AND SOIL VENTING PILE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS KN/WP/1890/WP1890.TXT/OS-10-9S(7^0pmyD?El TUT OO7 1831 Appendix B Soil Removal Action Photograph Number Description A. Soil Excavation Activities 1 2 3 4 Soil excavation activities using a backhoe Progressive excavation of soils Progressive excavation of soils Compacting dean backfill soils in the excavation area B. Soil Venting Pile Construction 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Washed coarse gravel (one-half to 1 inch) was used in the soil pile construction Washed coarse gravel (one-half to 1 inch) was used in the soil pile construction Excavated soils were interiayered with washed coarse gravel Excavated soils were interiayered with washed coarse gravel Corrugated black plastic vent pipes were placed horizontally in the gravel/soil layers A reinforced concrete block wall was built on the four sides of the soil pile A corrugated tin roof was built over the soil pile with roof turbines at the top of the vent pipes for passive soil venting KNAVPA89(VWPlS90.TXT/aS-ll-9S(3K)OpnyD3/El "H !T OO7 Photo No. 1 - Soil Excavation Activities Using a Backhoe Photo No. 2 - Progressive Excavation of Soils TUT OO7 1S33 Photo No. 3 - Progressive Excavation of Soils Photo No. 4 - Compacting Clean Backfill Soils in the Excavation Area TUT OO7 IS 3' Photo No. 5 - Washed Coarse Gravel (1/2 to 1 mch) Was Used hi the Soil Pile Construction Photo No. 6 - Washed Coarse Gravel (1/2 to 1 inch) Was Used hi the Soil Pile Construction TUT OO7 1835 Photo No. 7 - Excavated Soils Were Interlayered With Washed Coarse Gravel Photo No. 8 - Excavated Soils Were Interlayered With Washed Coarse Gravel TUT 007 1836 Photo No. 9 - Corrugated Black Plastic Vent Pipes Were Placed Horizontally in the Gravel/Soil Layers Photo No. 10 - A Reinforced Concrete Block Wall Was Built on the Four Sides of the Soil Pile TUT 007 1837 Photo No. 11 - A Corrugated Iron Roof Was Built Over the Soil Pile With Roof Turbines at the Top of the Vent Pipes for Passive Soil Venting TUT 1838