Netfa Petersen v. Steve Langford et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NEFTA PETERSEN, Petitioner, v. STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 16-08827-JGB (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_17-cv-00050/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_17-cv-00050-0.pdf
SHA-256 583e08d47e2b46a05aae0aa384aa51b13cf5deaecb1d1baae4a81b8258481ee2
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-583e08d47e2b
Document text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NEFTA PETERSEN, Petitioner, v. STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 16-08827-JGB (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner’s claims challenging the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ determination regarding Petitioner’s placement at a Residential Re-entry Center are dismissed with prejudice; and Case: 3:17-cv-00050-RAM-RM Document #: 22 Filed: 07/21/17 Page 1 of 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (2) The remainder of this action is transferred to the District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands. Dated: July 21, 2017 _______________________ JESUS G. BERNAL United States District Judge Case: 3:17-cv-00050-RAM-RM Document #: 22 Filed: 07/21/17 Page 2 of 2