VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Claudius Christopher v. Edward Penn, ST-1981-CV-011 (V.I. 1983) [unpublished]

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
superior.vicourts.org
Kind
Court Record
Date
1983-05-02
Pages
5
Text
OCR Text

-& IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN =o= CLAUDIUS CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff vs. CIVIL NO. 11/1981 «© 40 08 cf oe ne EDWARD PENN, Defendant DESMOND L. MAYNARD, ESQ. P. O. Box 8388 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (Attorney for Plaintiff) RHYS S. HODGE, ESQ. No. 19 Norre Gade St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (Attorney for Defendant) MEMORANDUM OPINION ( February Ss » 1983) FEUERZEIG, J. May a person to whom a jury awarded only nominal damages recover costs, including attorney's fees? The court believes he may. Plaintiff Claudius Christopher sued defendant Edward Penn for assault and battery, and the defendant counterclaimed for Past due rent. At trial, Christopher introduced records of emergency room treatment and receipts for the purchase of medication, all of which were alleged to be a result of the injuries he sustained at the hands of the defendant. The jury found that the defendant committed an unprivileged assault and battery upon the plaintiff, but deter- mined the damages that he suffered to have been only $1.00. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://superior.vicourts.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12810747/File/Opinions/Archive/Christopher%20v.%20Penn%20(HLF).pdf

SHA-256 589d2c779ea38fd618bdb00ce6119710e1722919a4ca3cb38580e8b773084651

Re-using this document

edicts of government — judicial opinions are not copyrightable by anyone. NOT 17 USC 105 (territorial court, not federal) and NOT 'rights unstated'.

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-589d2c779ea3

Document text

-& IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN =o= CLAUDIUS CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff vs. CIVIL NO. 11/1981 «© 40 08 cf oe ne EDWARD PENN, Defendant DESMOND L. MAYNARD, ESQ. P. O. Box 8388 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (Attorney for Plaintiff) RHYS S. HODGE, ESQ. No. 19 Norre Gade St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (Attorney for Defendant) MEMORANDUM OPINION ( February Ss » 1983) FEUERZEIG, J. May a person to whom a jury awarded only nominal damages recover costs, including attorney's fees? The court believes he may. Plaintiff Claudius Christopher sued defendant Edward Penn for assault and battery, and the defendant counterclaimed for Past due rent. At trial, Christopher introduced records of emergency room treatment and receipts for the purchase of medication, all of which were alleged to be a result of the injuries he sustained at the hands of the defendant. The jury found that the defendant committed an unprivileged assault and battery upon the plaintiff, but deter- mined the damages that he suffered to have been only $1.00. Plaintiff now seeks an award of costs and attorney's fees as the 1/ prevailing party, which the defendant opposes. Certain costs, including attorney's fees, “may be allowed in a 2/ civil action" pursuant to 5 V.I.C. 8541 (1967), but the award of attorney's fees to a prevailing party is a matter within the L/ Both parties treat the award of costs to be governed by the Same standards as the award of attorney's fees. The court proceeds on the same assumption. 5 V.1I.C. §541 (1967) states: 68541. Costs Defined (a) Costs which may be allowed in a civil action include: (1) Fees of officers, witnesses, and jurors; (2) Necessary expenses of taking depositions which were reasonably necessary in the action; (3) Expenses of publication of the summons or notices, and the postage when they are served by mail; (4) Compensation of a master as provided in Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (5) Necessary expense of copying any public record, book, or document used as evidence in the trial, and (6) Attorney's fees as provided in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The measure and mode of compensation of attorneys shall be left to the agreement, expressed or implied of the parties; but there shall be allowed to the prevailing party in the judgment such sums as the court in its discretion may fix by way of indemnity for his attorneys's fees in maintain- ing the action or defenses thereto. discretion of the court. Collins v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 5 V.I. 622, 636, 366 F.2d 279, 286 (3d Cir. 1966); Smith v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 5 V.I. 536, 539-41, 361 F.2d 459, 471 (3d Cir. 1966); Bevans v. Triumpho, 17 V.1I. 144, 148 (Terr. Ct. 1980); Feddersen v. Miller, 17 V.L. 134, 136 (Terr. Ct. 1980). Defendant argues, however, that the plaintiff did not prevail, but merely recovered nominal damages, and that he is not entitled to recover any costs. Indeed, in an apparent overstatement defendant claims, "In awarding damages of $1.00 the jury necessarily found that plaintiff was entitled to no damages." The court dis- agrees. An award of $1.00 damages is an award of nominal damages, and not an award of no damages. Furthermore, the amount of damages recovered is irrelevant to the award of costs. Even where a plaintiff recovers only nominal damages the court in the exercise 3/ of its discretion may award attorney's fees. Milwe v. Cavuoto, 653 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1981) (judgment of $1.00 against law enforce- ment officer in plaintiff's constitutional claim for civil rights violations is sufficient to support award of attorney's fees under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 81988 (1976)); Perez v. University of Puerto Rico, 600 F.2d 1, 2 3/ The court finds the authority cited by plaintiff and defendant for contradictory propositions to be inapposite. Ledge Hill Farms, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 230 F.Supp. 638 (S.D. N.Y. 1964) holds neither, as the defendant contends, that "[w]lhere lia- bility is found for a plaintiff but only nominal damages awarded, plaintiff is not the prevailing party," nor, as the plaintiff con- tends, that "a plaintiff, in order to be a prevailing party, must at least be awarded nominal damages." What the court held was that where liability apparently was established but no damages were awarded, defendant was a "prevailing party," but still was entitled only to recover docket fees of $20. Except for that award, each party was ordered to bear its own costs. (lst Cir. 1979) (award of nominal damages in a civil rights suit is not grounds for denying attorney's fees, 42 U.S.C. 81988 (1776)) see Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 257 n.11 (1978) (although only nominal damages would be recoverable for justified suspension with- out due process, students nevertheless would be able to recover attorney's fees). Even a plaintiff's failure to obtain monetary relief does not mean he did not prevail. Nanty v. Barrows Co., 660 F.2d 1327, 1334 n.10 (9th Cir. 1981); Manhart v. City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 652 F.2d 904, 907 (9th Cir. 1981); Williams v. Thomas, 511 F.Supp. 535, 544 (N.D. Tex. 1981). Compare Fernandes v. Limmner, 663 F.2d 619, 638 (Sth Cir. 1981) (plaintiff's abandonment of "all claims for money damages" did not amount to a waiver of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988 (1976)). While the cases cited in Support of awarding costs to a party who received only nominal damages involve a federal Statute author- izing the award of attorney's fees in civil rights actions, a! this court believes the rationale applied is equally applicable in interpreting the language of 5 V.I.C. 8541 and holds that a party to whom nominal damages are awarded is a "prevailing party" within the meaning of that statute. Accordingly, upon the plaintiff's sub- mission of an affidavit substantiating its costs in accordance with Lindy Brothers Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corp., 487 F.2d 161 (3d Cir. 1973), the court will 4/ 42 U.S.C. 61988 provides, in pertinent part, that “the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs." award appropriate attorney's fees. FE Judge of the Térritorial Court