United States of America v. Government of the Virgin Islands et al
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 3:25-cv-00050 ) v. ) ) THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ) ISLANDS, THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) POLICE DEPARTMENT, and MARIO ) BROOKS, in his official capacity as Police ) Commissioner of the territory of the Virgin ) Islands, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 65, to strike the Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction set forth at ECF No. 64. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion to strike is hereby DENIED. Dated: August 18, 2026. s/ Evan Rikhye _________________________________ EVAN RIKHYE United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00050-ER-GAT Document #: 80 Filed: 08/18/26 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_25-cv-00050/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_25-cv-00050-1.pdf
SHA-256 5bb36c0992c2a86ebeb8917d22e175842d46aca0cae8f1c06c8b4ffb0a700c1a
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-5bb36c0992c2
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 3:25-cv-00050 ) v. ) ) THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ) ISLANDS, THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) POLICE DEPARTMENT, and MARIO ) BROOKS, in his official capacity as Police ) Commissioner of the territory of the Virgin ) Islands, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 65, to strike the Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction set forth at ECF No. 64. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion to strike is hereby DENIED. Dated: August 18, 2026. s/ Evan Rikhye _________________________________ EVAN RIKHYE United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00050-ER-GAT Document #: 80 Filed: 08/18/26 Page 1 of 1