USA v. Leonard et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TOMMY RAMIREZ Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-12 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Alex Omar Rosa-Ambert Rosa-Ambert Law Offices San Juan, PR For Tommy Ramirez. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Tommy Ramirez (“Ramirez”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including June 1, 2019. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically Case: 3:19-cr-00012-RAM-RM Document #: 38 Filed: 04/10/19 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Leonard et al. Criminal No. 2019-12 Order finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Ramirez time to investigate the charges against him. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00012/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00012-0.pdf
SHA-256 5c2bf3ec3ef1c733397172b4fb71b5989b72230fe32b4d9a008b874c8707b644
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-5c2bf3ec3ef1
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TOMMY RAMIREZ Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-12 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Alex Omar Rosa-Ambert Rosa-Ambert Law Offices San Juan, PR For Tommy Ramirez. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Tommy Ramirez (“Ramirez”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including June 1, 2019. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically Case: 3:19-cr-00012-RAM-RM Document #: 38 Filed: 04/10/19 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Leonard et al. Criminal No. 2019-12 Order finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Ramirez time to investigate the charges against him. Second, Ramirez made his request with the advice and consent of counsel. Third, without an extension, Ramirez would be denied reasonable time necessary to review discovery and prepare for trial. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that “whether or not a case is ‘unusual’ or ‘complex,’ an ‘ends of justice’ continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted.” United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994) (“An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial [even if the] case [i]s not ‘complex.’”); see also United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992) (“[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion when it delayed the trial to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense.”); United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding there was no abuse of discretion where district court found that multiple count, multiple defendant “case was Case: 3:19-cr-00012-RAM-RM Document #: 38 Filed: 04/10/19 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Leonard et al. Criminal No. 2019-12 Order complex and required additional time for adequate preparation.”). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through June 1, 2019, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial for Ramirez must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:19-cr-00012-RAM-RM Document #: 38 Filed: 04/10/19 Page 3 of 3