Rivera, Marina v. Kmart Corporation
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MARINA RIVERA : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 05-0076 : KMART CORPORATION : O R D E R AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion in Limine to Strike Witnesses (Document No. 109) and the plaintiff’s response, and after argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED . 1 s/Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J. The plaintiff is not precluded from calling Joanne Ruiz as a witness not only because she was 1 disclosed in discovery, but she was also known to the defendant. Her testimony, however, shall be limited to those facts which could have put the defendant on notice of a dangerous condition resulting from the leaking air conditioning unit two weeks prior to the plaintiff’s incident. Case: 1:05-cv-00076-TJS Document #: 190 Filed: 11/10/09 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00076/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00076-2.pdf
SHA-256 5fdc1ea675b05f16f5985b9478d4d582abfbba5157ecff1cae78b38c453ce4c4
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-5fdc1ea675b0
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MARINA RIVERA : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 05-0076 : KMART CORPORATION : O R D E R AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion in Limine to Strike Witnesses (Document No. 109) and the plaintiff’s response, and after argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED . 1 s/Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J. The plaintiff is not precluded from calling Joanne Ruiz as a witness not only because she was 1 disclosed in discovery, but she was also known to the defendant. Her testimony, however, shall be limited to those facts which could have put the defendant on notice of a dangerous condition resulting from the leaking air conditioning unit two weeks prior to the plaintiff’s incident. Case: 1:05-cv-00076-TJS Document #: 190 Filed: 11/10/09 Page 1 of 1