USA v. Mathurin
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal Action No. 2014-00055 RAYMOND MATHURIN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Omodare Jupiter, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Dkt. No. 5), the Government’s response thereto (1:14-cr-00049, Dkt. No. 35), the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is GRANTED in this matter as it relates to the statements Defendant made after Agent Gaumond informed him of the nature of the charges that he would face; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is DENIED as it relates to any voluntary statements made by Defendant before he was place …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00055/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00055-0.pdf
SHA-256 63b3854f9efddfa2d399b10ea976684024df9e0c0a81c5eef51a68d302fe9d92
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-63b3854f9efd
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal Action No. 2014-00055 RAYMOND MATHURIN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Omodare Jupiter, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Dkt. No. 5), the Government’s response thereto (1:14-cr-00049, Dkt. No. 35), the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is GRANTED in this matter as it relates to the statements Defendant made after Agent Gaumond informed him of the nature of the charges that he would face; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is DENIED as it relates to any voluntary statements made by Defendant before he was placed in handcuffs—including, “I started these plants from seeds, but I’m not a big marijuana farmer.”; and it is further Case: 1:14-cr-00055-WAL-GWC Document #: 17 Filed: 01/29/15 Page 1 of 2 2 ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is DENIED as it relates to the marijuana plants seized from Defendant’s property. SO ORDERED. Date: January 29, 2015 _______/s/________ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:14-cr-00055-WAL-GWC Document #: 17 Filed: 01/29/15 Page 2 of 2