Dupigny, Dale v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DALE DUPIGNY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:06-cv-33 v. 5 5 COLT ATLANTIC SERVICES, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yolan C. Brow, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Filing of the Offer of Judgment by the Defendant (Docket No. 119). Defendant filed a response to said motion, wherein it explains that it has had the document at issue restricted and has filed, in its place, a notice of service of offer of judgment with the original hand-delivered to counsel for Plaintiff. This order is issued without necessity of reply. It is clear from Defendant’s response that the relief sought by Plaintiff’s motion has been achieved. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Filing of the Offer of Judgment by the Defendant (Docket No. 119) is DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 123 Filed: 10/05/09 Page 1 of 2 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00033/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00033-3.pdf
SHA-256 688f8ed28737c4cf3aa079554895b7deaafc2b03a65764603951f4741a5e2920
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-688f8ed28737
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DALE DUPIGNY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:06-cv-33 v. 5 5 COLT ATLANTIC SERVICES, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yolan C. Brow, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Filing of the Offer of Judgment by the Defendant (Docket No. 119). Defendant filed a response to said motion, wherein it explains that it has had the document at issue restricted and has filed, in its place, a notice of service of offer of judgment with the original hand-delivered to counsel for Plaintiff. This order is issued without necessity of reply. It is clear from Defendant’s response that the relief sought by Plaintiff’s motion has been achieved. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Filing of the Offer of Judgment by the Defendant (Docket No. 119) is DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 123 Filed: 10/05/09 Page 1 of 2 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. 1:06-cv-33 Order ENTER: Dated: October 5, 2009 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 123 Filed: 10/05/09 Page 2 of 2