USVI Public Records

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL ELIAS PENA COLUMNA and RAMMER ANDRES GUERRERO-MORALES Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-65 ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney George A. Massucco-LaTaif, AUSA Juan Albino, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Michael L. Sheesley MLSPC St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Samuel Elias Pena Columna, Yohana M Manning Christiansted, U.S.V.I. For Rammer Andres Guerrero-Morales. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Rammer Andres Guerrero-Morales (“Guerrero-Morales”) to waive his speedy trial. Guerrero-Morales also moves to continue the trial in this matter. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including March 9, 2020. Case: 3:19-cr-00065-RAM-RM Document #: 79 Filed: 12/16/19 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Columna et al. Criminal No. 2019-65 Order While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice. First, an extension of time is necessary to allow Guerrero-Morales time to review the discovery in this matter. Second, without an extension, Guerrero-Morales would be denied reasonable time necessary to explore plea options and prepare for trial. Third, Guerrero-Morales made his request with the advice and consent of counsel. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that “whether or not a case is ‘unusual’ or ‘complex,’ an ‘ends of justice’ continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted.” United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994) (“An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial [even if the] case [i]s not ‘complex.’”); see also United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992) (“[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion when it delayed the trial to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense.”); United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding there was no abuse of discretion where district Case: 3:19-cr-00065-RAM-RM Document #: 79 Filed: 12/16/19 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Columna et al. Criminal No. 2019-65 Order court found that multiple count, multiple defendant “case was complex and required additional time for adequate preparation.”); cf. United States v. Santiago-Becerril, 130 F.3d 11, 17 (1st Cir. 1997) (explaining that, where a defendant had moved to continue his trial due to his counsel’s unavailability, the “period of delay” caused by an ends of justice continuance includes the time “reasonably required to schedule a new trial date” in “consideration of the court’s calendar”). The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through March 9, 2020, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial for Samuel Elias Pena Columna and Rammer Andres Guerrero-Morales must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161; it is further ORDERED that Guerrero-Morales’s motion to continue, ECF No. 68, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the jury trial in this matter previously scheduled for December 23, 2019, is hereby RESCHEDULED to commence promptly at 9:00 A.M. on March 9, 2020, in Saint Thomas Courtroom 1 before District Judge Curtis V. Gomez. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:19-cr-00065-RAM-RM Document #: 79 Filed: 12/16/19 Page 3 of 3