Burke-Ventura, Maureen v. Vitelco
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MAUREEN BURKE-VENTURA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0141 v. 5 5 VITELCO, INNOVATIVE 5 COMMUNICATION CORPORATION, 5 and DAVID SHARP, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Kevin A. Rames, Esq. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RECONSIDER THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31) and Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 32). The time for filing a response has expired. A review of the record reflects that by text-entry only Order (Docket No. 19), the Court granted Defendant Innovative Communication Corporation’s Motion For Commencement of Action Under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code; Automatic Stay (Docket No. 15) and Plaintiff’s motions to sever Defendant Innovative Case: 1:06-cv-00141-JEJ Document #: 36 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 1 of 2 Burke-Ventura v. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00141/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00141-1.pdf
SHA-256 6db78dc4386b8e5ec00e3ec7bfb202eecbdbc0effcae3c0d8b2e6adccd729a34
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-6db78dc4386b
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MAUREEN BURKE-VENTURA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0141 v. 5 5 VITELCO, INNOVATIVE 5 COMMUNICATION CORPORATION, 5 and DAVID SHARP, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Kevin A. Rames, Esq. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RECONSIDER THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31) and Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 32). The time for filing a response has expired. A review of the record reflects that by text-entry only Order (Docket No. 19), the Court granted Defendant Innovative Communication Corporation’s Motion For Commencement of Action Under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code; Automatic Stay (Docket No. 15) and Plaintiff’s motions to sever Defendant Innovative Case: 1:06-cv-00141-JEJ Document #: 36 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 1 of 2 Burke-Ventura v. VITELCO 2006-CV-0141 Order Granting Motion to Reconsider Communication Corporation (Docket No. 17) and to lift stay as to Defendants VITELCO and Sharp (Docket No. 18). Consequently, the Court erred when it entered its Order Granting Motion to Amend Answer (Docket No. 30), as such motion was filed on behalf of all Defendants. Therefore, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider and vacate such order and strike the motion to amend and amended answer. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 31) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order Allowing Amendment and to Strike Motion to Amend Answer and the Amended Answer (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED. 3. The Court’s Order Granting Motion to Amend Answer (Docket No. 30) is VACATED. 4. Defendants’ Motion to Amend Answer (Docket No. 22) and Amended Answer (Docket No. 23) are STRICKEN. ENTER: Dated: March 19, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cv-00141-JEJ Document #: 36 Filed: 03/19/08 Page 2 of 2