Fort Segarra Formerly Used Defense Site Community Relations Plan
Community Relations Plan Fort Segarra Water Island, United States Virgin Islands United States Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Jacksonville, Florida 32207-0019 MAY 2020 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan i Table of Contents Page 1.0 Overview of Community Relations Plan .............................................................................1 2.0 Site Description and History ................................................................................................1 2.1 Property History .................................................................................................................1 2.1.1 Potential Contaminants ..............................................................................................2 2.1.2 United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Involvement ..............................................2 2.1.3 Community Reaction ..................................................................................................3 2.2 Property Description and Location .......................................................................... …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16021coll7/id/28144
SHA-256 6ed840ecd4c4c5a18a697bfc87cc24a150429196056bbf35bc55b7d61d21dd85
Re-using this document
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-6ed840ecd4c4
Document text
Community Relations Plan Fort Segarra Water Island, United States Virgin Islands United States Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Jacksonville, Florida 32207-0019 MAY 2020 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan i Table of Contents Page 1.0 Overview of Community Relations Plan .............................................................................1 2.0 Site Description and History ................................................................................................1 2.1 Property History .................................................................................................................1 2.1.1 Potential Contaminants ..............................................................................................2 2.1.2 United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Involvement ..............................................2 2.1.3 Community Reaction ..................................................................................................3 2.2 Property Description and Location ....................................................................................3 2.3 Property Inspections and Cleanup Activities .....................................................................3 2.3.1 Known or Suspected Contamination ..........................................................................3 2.3.2 Nature of Threat .........................................................................................................3 2.3.3 History of Inspections and Studies Conducted at the Site..........................................4 2.3.4 Lead Agency ..............................................................................................................7 3.0 Community Background ......................................................................................................7 3.1 Community Profile .............................................................................................................7 3.2 History of Community Involvement ..................................................................................8 3.3 Key Community Concerns .................................................................................................8 3.4 Response to Community Concerns ....................................................................................8 3.5 Summary of Communication Needs ..................................................................................8 4.0 Public Involvement Program ...............................................................................................8 4.1 The Plan..............................................................................................................................8 4.2 Projected Schedule for Community Involvement Activities............................................11 5.0 References ..........................................................................................................................12 Appendix A: Community Survey .............................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B: Media Contacts ......................................................................................................B-1 Appendix C: Potential Meeting Locations ..................................................................................C-1 Appendix D: Public Involvement Tools .................................................................................... D-1 Appendix E: Stakeholders List ................................................................................................... E-1 Figures Figure 1: Fort Segarra Location Map............................................................................................. 2 Figure 2: Fort Segarra Flamingo Bay and Test Areas ................................................................... 4 Tables Table 1: Previous Studies and Historical Documents .................................................................... 4 Table 2: Census Data for Water Island, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands and Nation .................. 7 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 1 1.0 OVERVIEW OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN The United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District (the Corps) developed this Community Relations Plan to facilitate two-way communication between the community living or working within or near the Fort Segarra Formerly Used Defense Site and the Corps and to en- courage community involvement in site activities. The Corps will utilize the community in- volvement activities outlined in this plan to ensure that residents are continuously informed of available opportunities to be involved. This Community Relations Plan addresses the site’s relationship to the community and the Corps (Section 2.0), provides a background of the community (Section 3.0), presents the Corps’ com- munity involvement program (Section 4.0), and provides a listing of available resources. The Corps drew upon several information sources to develop this plan and will oversee the imple- mentation of the community involvement activities outlined in this plan. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY Across the country, the Department of Defense acquired properties, often during times of con- flict, to use for military demonstrations, training, and testing. Once the military no longer needed the land, it was transferred to other entities. These Formerly Used Defense Sites can range from privately-owned farms to national parks. They also include residential, educational, and industrial areas. The Department of Defense is committed to correcting environmental dam- age caused by its activities and created the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for For- merly Used Defense Sites to evaluate, and if necessary, remediate Formerly Used Defense Sites. The Corps is responsible for managing the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for For- merly Used Defense Sites on behalf of the Department of Defense. 2.1 PROPERTY HISTORY Fort Segarra is located on Water Island, the smallest of the United States (U.S.) Virgin Islands at 491.5 acres (see Figure 1). The U.S. government acquired Water Island from the Danish East Asiatic Company in 1944 to use for coastal defense. Construction of Fort Segarra began in 1944 but was not completed prior to the end of World War II, and the Army deactivated the site in 1946. While the concrete gun positions and supporting buildings were completed, the guns were never installed. The U.S. Army Chemical Corps also used portions of Water Island for limited testing and storage of chemical munitions from 1948 to 1950 as part of the San Jose Project. (The Test Areas are noted in Figure 1.) Tests were well-documented, and the chemical muni- tions were removed from the island at the end of the test program. In 1952, Water Island was transferred to the U.S. Department of the Interior and leased to a pri- vate party to develop a hotel and resort. The Water Island Hotel opened in 1954 and operated until 1989, when it was badly damaged by Hurricane Hugo. The lease expired in 1992 and, in 1996, the Department of Interior transferred Water Island to the U.S. Virgin Islands. The hotel and associated structures were demolished in 1998. In 2014, a lease was issued for a new hotel and resort. Residential development has also taken place on the island. In September 2017, Hur- ricanes Irma and Maria caused wide-spread damage to the island. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 2 Figure 1: Fort Segarra Location Map 2.1.1 Potential Contaminants The U.S. Army Chemical Corps used parts of Water Island to conduct limited tests with chemi- cal munitions. Following completion of the testing program, the chemical munitions and the chemicals agents they may have contained, were removed from the island. Since that time, sev- eral studies have been completed at Fort Segarra that confirm there is no hazard associated with the site’s past use for chemical munitions testing and storage. The Army did not store or use any other munitions at Fort Segarra. 2.1.2 United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Involvement Shortly after the Defense Environmental Restoration Program-Formerly Used Defense Sites be- gan, the Corps visited the site, and in 1989, determined it was eligible for the program. Please Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 3 see Section 2.3.3 for a list and summary of previous studies and investigations conducted for Fort Segarra. Most recently, the Corps completed a Remedial Investigation. The purpose of a Remedial Inves- tigation is to determine and document the types of munitions that may be present, the amounts, and locations. This is known as characterizing the nature and extent of potential military related impacts. For Fort Segarra, the Remedial Investigation relied on information from the previous studies and investigations to verify that there are no conventional munitions and/or munitions constituents (metals and explosives that comprise munitions) at the site. Additionally, infor- mation regarding the areas where a limited number of chemical tests were conducted was evalu- ated and confirmed that chemical munitions and/or chemical agents are not present at the site. 2.1.3 Community Reaction The public is generally aware of the military’s use of Water Island. There is a great deal of in- formation about Fort Segarra on various websites, in addition to the Corps’, and the Corps placed signs on the island describing the Army’s training and what to do if munitions are discovered. The Corps has also coordinated with the Water Island Civic Association to share information about the site with the community. Although to date there have been no concerns expressed by the community, the Corps will continue to monitor the community’s interest and will respond ac- cordingly. 2.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Fort Segarra is located on Water Island, the smallest of the four U.S. Virgin Islands. Water Is- land is approximately 1,800 feet from St. Thomas and directly south from its capital city, Char- lotte Amalie. The project site, which is in the southern part of the island, includes four non-con- tiguous areas that were used in conjunction with the military’s testing activities. The four areas include the Flamingo Bay Landfill and Test Areas 4, 5, and 8 (see Figure 2). Water Island is pri- marily residential with some commercial and government enterprises. 2.3 PROPERTY INSPECTIONS AND CLEANUP ACTIVITIES 2.3.1 Known or Suspected Contamination Based on the historical use of the Fort Segarra Formerly Used Defense Site, the Corps was con- cerned about the potential presence of munitions and chemical warfare materiel. 2.3.2 Nature of Threat Munitions could pose a potential safety hazard to people who touch, pick up, or otherwise dis- turb them. The metals and explosives that comprise munitions could potentially be a risk to peo- ple and the environment if they are released to the soil and/or sediment. Chemical warfare mate- riel, if present, would be dangerous to people and the environment. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 4 Figure 2: Fort Segarra Flamingo Bay and Test Areas 2.3.3 History of Inspections and Studies Conducted at the Site Inspections and studies conducted at Fort Segarra are listed in Table 1 and summarized below the table. Table 1: Previous Studies and Historical Documents Year Completed Activity 1947-1950 San Jose Project Progress Reports 1966 Navy Report Regarding Ordnance Discovery at Flamingo Bay Landfill 1989 Inventory Project Report 1991 Archives Search Report 1991 Photographic Analysis 1993 Scoping Study Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 5 Year Completed Activity 1995 Site Characterization Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Report 1995 Environmental Assessment 2001 Historical Photographic Analysis 2001 Preliminary Assessment 2002 Revised Archives Search Report 2004 Site Investigation Report 2005 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis 2006 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis Action Memorandum 2009 Site-Specific Final Report 2012 Five-Year Review Report 2013 Revised Inventory Project Report 2016 Site-Specific Final Report 1947-1950 San Jose Project Progress Reports The progress reports document the chemical warfare materiel testing completed from November 1947 through March 1950, including testing that took place at Water Island. 1966 Navy Report Regarding Ordnance Discovery at Flamingo Bay Landfill The Navy reported several metal objects found during a dredging operation at the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area in 1966. The metal objects were identified as possible chemical bombs, but the re- port stated there was no noticeable release of chemical agent. 1989 Inventory Project Report As part of the Inventory Project Report, a team visited the site and found no evidence of muni- tions, chemical warfare materiel, or chemical agents. The report recommended an investigation of the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area where several possible chemical bombs were found in 1966. 1991 Archives Search Report The Archives Search Report compiled information obtained through historical research at vari- ous archives and records holding facilities, interviews with individuals associated with the site or its operations, and personal visits to the site. The purpose of the report was to determine types of munitions used at the site, possible disposal areas, and any unknown training areas in order to de- velop recommendations for further actions. 1991 Photographic Analysis The Corps analyzed aerial photographs from 1948, 1954, and 1958 and determined that there was only one area identified, located in Test Area 5, which may have been used for testing and possible disposal. 1993 Scoping Study The Scoping Study provided additional information on Army Chemical Corps’ activities at Fort Segarra, based on archival research and interviews with former Chemical Corps personnel. The interviews indicated that the six tests conducted at Fort Segarra were controlled and well-docu- mented, and after each test, the team decontaminated the area. Furthermore, the types and lim- ited numbers of test items used allowed for easy removal after the testing was complete. The Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 6 study indicated no further investigation was needed for most areas at Water Island and recom- mended an additional investigation for Test Areas 4 and 5 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill. 1995 Site Characterization Phase I Remedial Investigation Report Site characterization and debris removal operations were conducted in 1993 and 1994 at Water Island, including at Test Areas 4, 5, and 8 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. The characteri- zation activities included surface inspections, magnetometer sweeps and surveys, and soil sam- pling. While there were no munitions, chemical warfare materiel, munitions debris, or chemical agents, the report recommended an additional investigation for portions of Test Areas 4 and 5 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. 1995 Environmental Assessment This Environmental Assessment report presented the results of a site inspection of Test Areas 4 and 5 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. Abandoned vehicles and household and construction debris were noted in multiple locations, but the team did not identify any munitions or chemical warfare materiel. 2001 Preliminary Assessment The Department of Interior completed a Preliminary Assessment and recommended additional soil sampling. 2001 Historical Photographic Analysis The Corps analyzed historical aerial photographs of Water Island to identify areas where chemi- cal warfare materiel testing potentially took place, with a focus on Test Areas 4 and 5 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. 2002 Revised Archives Search Report The Revised Archives Search Report summarized additional archival research, interviews, aerial photographic analysis, and a site visit. Although potential munitions related activities were noted for two batteries and Test Area 4, the report confirmed that guns were never installed at the batteries, and there was no evidence of munitions or munitions debris. The report also docu- mented the chemical warfare materiel used and removed from the site and concluded there was no contamination associated with the Army’s activities. No further action was recommended. 2004 Site Investigation Report The Department of Interior conducted a Site Investigation in conjunction with the fieldwork for the 2005 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis. They collected soil samples from Test Areas 4, 5, and 8 and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area and analyzed them for explosives, chemical agents, and other non-munitions related chemicals. The results indicated there was no potential risk to people or the environment in Test Areas 4, 5, and 8, and the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area, and no further investigation was required. 2005 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis This evaluation and analysis included 46 test pits, 17 trenches, 88 soil samples, and 8 back- ground soil samples. No munitions or chemical warfare materiel were identified, and the only chemical warfare materiel-related items were scrap metal found at the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. No munitions constituents or chemical agents were detected in the soil samples. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 7 2006 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis Action Memorandum The Action Memorandum recommended removing the scrap metal identified at the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area during the 2005 investigation and site-wide institutional controls in the form of public awareness. 2009 Site-Specific Final Report This report documents removal of the scrap metal from the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area and in- stallation of two signs describing the historical chemical warfare materiel testing done on Water Island as part of the site-wide institutional controls. 2012 Five-Year Review The Five Year Review was conducted to determine if the implemented alternative recommended in the Action Memorandum remained protective of people and the environment. The report con- cluded the remedy remained protective and that there were no reported incidents involving muni- tions, chemical warfare materiel, or munitions debris at the site. 2013 Revised Inventory Project Report The Corps revised the Inventory Project Report to change the size and scope of Project 01 to in- clude Test Areas 4, 5, and 8 to the Flamingo Bay Landfill Area. 2016 Site-Specific Final Report This report documented the replacement of the two informational signs on Water Island. 2.3.4 Lead Agency The Corps is the lead agency and is responsible for cleanup activities related to the military’s use of the site. The Corps is coordinating with Virgin Islands government representatives, including representatives from the Department of Planning and Natural Resources, and other stakeholders. 3.0 COMMUNITY BACKGROUND 3.1 COMMUNITY PROFILE Fort Segarra lies entirely within the census district of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and, specifically, the census subdistrict of Water Island. On average, the population on Water Island is older, more educated, and has a higher mean household income than other residents in St. Thomas and the Virgin Islands. When considering meeting locations, the Corps will be mindful that 21.5 percent of the population does not have a vehicle. The Corps does not anticipate that meetings and printed materials need translation as the majority of the population speaks English, but the team will monitor the situation and will provide translations as necessary. Table 2: Census Data for Water Island, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands and Nation Subject Water Island St. Thomas Virgin Islands United States Estimate % Estimate % Estimate % Estimate % Total population 182 51,634 106,405 308,745,538 White 161 88.50 7,814 15.13 16,646 15.64 231,040,398 74.80 Black or African American 8 4.40 41,310 80.01 80,908 76.04 42,020,743 13.60 Hispanic or Latino 8 4.40 5,787 11.21 18,504 17.39 50,477,594 16.30 Median age (years) 55.3 39.8 39.2 37.2 Owner-occupied housing units 58 62.40 8,747 40.58 20,700 47.90 75,986,074 65.10 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 8 Subject Water Island St. Thomas Virgin Islands United States Estimate % Estimate % Estimate % Estimate % Population over Age 25 without high school diploma 6 3.90 10,619 30.20 70,813 31.10 16,394,069 7.80 Language Spoken at Home: Eng- lish only 166 91.21 36,111 69.94 70,864 66.60 232,724,203 79.10 Language other than English 10 5.49 12,035 23.31 28,041 26.35 61,409,170 20.90 Speak English less than "very well" 3 1.65 4,794 9.28 9,382 8.82 25,305,202 8.60 Mean household income $65,551 $53,487 $52,261 $74,596 Population below Poverty Line 8.20 19.20 22.20 15.5 Families below Poverty Line 2 2.10 1,895 9 4,789 11.10 8,761,827 11.30 No vehicles available 20 21.50 5,001 23.20 8,902 20.60 10,628,474 9.10 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Demographic Profile Data 3.2 HISTORY OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT There has been limited community interest in the Corps’ projects associated with Fort Segarra. The Corps will continue to inform the community and will respond to any concerns that are raised. 3.3 KEY COMMUNITY CONCERNS No community concerns have been raised to date, but the Corps will monitor the situation closely as activities continue to educate the public and to encourage them to participate in the re- medial investigation process. 3.4 RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY CONCERNS The Corps will continue public involvement activities and will respond should any concerns arise. 3.5 SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION NEEDS Planned or completed public information activities have been coordinated with the Water Island Civic Association to provide information to the community. The association has posted various notices for the project along with a letter and fact sheet related to the Proposed Plan. 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM The overall goal of the Corps’ public involvement program is to promote two-way communica- tion between citizens and the Corps and to provide opportunities for meaningful and active in- volvement by the community in the remedial investigation process. The Corps has or will imple- ment the community involvement activities described below. The following plan is based on concerns frequently expressed by those living near or on a Formerly Used Defense Site. 4.1 THE PLAN Issue 1: Keeping the Public Informed Activity 1A: Designate a Corps public involvement coordinator Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 9 • Objective: To provide a primary liaison between the community and the Corps and to ensure prompt, accurate, and consistent responses, and information dissem- ination about the site • Method: The Corps will designate a public affairs specialist to handle site inquir- ies and serve as a point of contact for community members. The public affairs specialist will work closely with the Corps project manager. • Timing: The public affairs specialist was assigned at the beginning of the project. Activity 1B: Prepare and distribute site fact sheets and technical summaries • Objective: To provide citizens with current, accurate, easy-to-read, and easy-to- understand information about Fort Segarra • Method: Fact sheets will be provided to property owners and will be available on the Corps’ website (www.saj.usace.army.mil/FortSegarra). • Timing: The Corps will prepare and distribute fact sheets as necessary, but at least at the beginning and end of each phase of work. Activity 1C: Provide a toll-free telephone number for the community to contact the Corps • Objective: To enable citizens to get the latest information available when they want it, rather than having to wait for a meeting or a fact sheet and without incur- ring any cost • Method: The Corps has a toll-free number that is provided in the fact sheets. • Timing: The toll-free telephone line is currently operational (800.710.5184). Activity 1D: Maintain a mailing list for the site • Objective: To facilitate the distribution of site-specific information to everyone who needs or wants to be kept informed about the site • Method: The Corps is coordinating information dissemination through the Water Island Civic Association • Timing: Throughout the project Activity 1E: Establish and Maintain an Administrative Record file • Objective: To provide residents the documents and resources used by the Corps in reaching decisions about the site in a convenient location where residents can read official documents and other pertinent information about the site • Method: The Corps will provide at least two sets of the Administrative Record file for the site, one at the Corps’ Jacksonville, Florida office and one at the Jack- sonville District’s website for Fort Segarra • Timing: The Administrative Record was opened when the Remedial Investiga- tion began, and it will remain open until the Decision Document is signed. It is available at www.saj.usace.army.mil/FortSegarra Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 10 Activity 1F: Provide project information on the internet • Objective: To provide site and project information as well as general Formerly Used Defense Site information • Method: Project information is posted on the Corps’ website. • Timing: Project information and reports are on the Jacksonville Districts Fort Segarra website (www.saj.usace.army.mil/FortSegarra). Issue 2: Provide Adequate and Meaningful Opportunities for Community Involvement Activity 2A: Hold public meetings and special events • Objective: To update the community on site developments and address commu- nity questions, concerns, ideas, and comments • Method: Meetings will be hosted, as needed, during this phase of work. The Corps will schedule, prepare for and attend all announced meetings. The Corps will provide at least a two-week notice in advance of the scheduled meeting. • Timing: As needed Activity 2B: Solicit interest in a Restoration Advisory Board • Objective: To provide citizens with a meaningful way to become actively in- volved and to provide the project delivery team with a viable means of learning citizen concerns and attitudes • Method: The Corps will solicit interest in a Restoration Advisory Board and will provide support as appropriate to facilitate its formation. If formed, the Corps will provide administrative support, and the Corps’ project manager will serve as co-chair along with a representative elected from among the community repre- sentatives on the board. • Timing: The Corps evaluated the need for a Restoration Advisory Board at the initiation of the Remedial Investigation and determined there was not sufficient, sustained interest. Activity 2C: Make informal visits to community • Objective: To help keep community members informed about the site while providing the Corps with feedback about site activities and the community’s opin- ions • Method: The Corps will establish a presence in the community through coordina- tion with the Water Island Civic Association. • Timing: Calls, as well as periodic visits if needed, will be made throughout the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study phase. Activity 2D: Solicit comments during a public comment period • Objective: The objective is to give community members an opportunity to review and comment on various Corps documents, especially the Proposed Plan. The re- Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 11 view period provides an opportunity for the citizens to have meaningful involve- ment in the process while giving the project delivery team valuable information from the community. • Method: The Corps will announce each comment period separately, if necessary. Announcements will appear in local newspapers and fact sheets. Information on the duration and how and where to submit comments will be included. • Timing: The public comment period will be from May 28, 2020 through July 6, 2020. A virtual public meeting will be presented to provide information on the Proposed Plan at the start of the comment period. Activity 2E: Prepare and issue a Responsiveness Summary • Objective: To summarize comments received during comment periods, to docu- ment how the Corps has considered those comments during the decision-making process, and to provide responses to major comments • Method: The Corps will prepare a Responsiveness Summary as a section of the Decision Document, which documents the remedy selection decision. The Re- sponsiveness Summary will include four sections: Overview, Background on Community Involvement, Summary of Comments Received and the Corps’ Re- sponses, Remedial Design/Remedial Action Concerns. Information, both tech- nical and nontechnical, will be conveyed in a manner that is easily understood. • Timing: The Responsiveness Summary is a part of the Decision Document. Activity 2F: Revise the Community Relations Plan • Objective: To identify and address community needs, issues, or concerns regard- ing the site that are not currently addressed in this Community Relations Plan • Method: The revised plan will update the previous version. • Timing: The Corps will revise the plan as community concerns warrant or at least every three years until the site is closed out. 4.2 PROJECTED SCHEDULE FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES Activity Time Frame Designate a Corps community involvement coor- dinator Complete Prepare and distribute site fact sheets and tech- nical summaries Complete and as necessary Provide a toll-free number Currently in operation Maintain a mailing list for the Formerly Used De- fense Site Ongoing Establish and maintain Information Repository Ongoing, update as needed Provide project information on the Internet Ongoing, update as needed Establish and maintain the Administrative Record Ongoing, update as needed Conduct special events As needed Hold public meetings As needed Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 12 Activity Time Frame Solicit interest in a Restoration Advisory Board Complete and re-evaluated every two years Make informal visits to community As needed Solicit comments during a public comment period Once the Proposed Plan is released Prepare and issue a Responsiveness Summary Following public comment period Revise the Community Relations Plan As needed 5.0 REFERENCES GovTrack. www.govtrack.us/congress/members/VI. U.S. Army Chemical Corps. San Jose Project Progress Reports. 1947-1950. U.S. Army Chemical Materiel Destruction Agency. Former Fort Segarra Scoping Study. Pre- pared by SAIC. December 1993. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Defense Environmental Restoration Program – For- merly Used Defense Sites, Inventory Project Report for the Former Fort Segarra, Project Number I02VI097701. Prepared by United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District. 1989. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Archive Search Report for the San Jose Project in the United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by Ebasco Environmental, Inc. July 8, 1991. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Area Analysis, 1948-1958, St. Thomas and Vicinity, Vir- gin Islands. Prepared by Biometrics Corporation. 1991. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Remediation of Sites in the United States Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico, Site Characterization, Former Fort Segarra, United States Virgin Is- lands, Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Report. Prepared by MTA, Inc. January 10, 1995. United States Army Corps of Engineers. St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands, Water Island, Historical Photo Analysis. Prepared by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Topographic Engineering Center. September 2001. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Defense Environmental Restoration Program for For- merly Used Defense Sites, Ordnance and Explosives Chemical Warfare Materiels, Ar- chives Search Report, Water Island (Fort Segarra), United States Virgin Islands, Project Number I02VI097701 (Volumes I to IV). Prepared by United States Army Corps of Engi- neers, St. Louis District. March 11, 2002. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Final Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Former Fort Segarra, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by Parsons. January 2005. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis, Action Memorandum, Former Fort Segarra, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Pre- pared by United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District. 2006. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Final Site-Specific Final Report, Former Fort Segarra, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by Parsons. April 22, 2009. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan 13 United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2011. Public Participation Requirements for Defense Environmental Restoration Program. Engineer Pamphlet 200-3-1. September 30, 2011. United States Army Corps of Engineers. First Five-Year Review Report for Fort Segarra, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by Explosive Ordnance Technologies, Inc./EA Engineer- ing, Science, and Technology, Inc. June 2012. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Memorandum: Approval of Defense Environmental Restoration Program- Formerly Used Defense Sites Revised Inventory Project Report for Property Number I02VI0977, Fort Segarra, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands. December 13, 2013. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Final Site-Specific Final Report Former Fort Segarra, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by USA Environmental. January 2016. United States Army Corps of Engineers. Final Remedial Investigation Report, Military Muni- tions Response Program, Fort Segarra Munitions Response Site 01, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands, Formerly Used Defense Site Project Number I02VI097701. August 2019. U.S. Census Bureau. http://factfinder.census.gov. U.S. Department of Interior. Level One and Level Two Site Survey and Environmental Site As- sessment, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by Dynamac. 1995. U.S. Department of Interior. Final Draft Preliminary Assessment, Site Assessment Report, Fla- mingo Bay Army Test Areas, Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by URS. July 17, 2001. U.S. Department of Interior. Site Investigation Report for the Flamingo Bay Army Test Areas, Former Fort Segarra at Water Island, United States Virgin Islands. Prepared by U.S. Bu- reau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center. April 17, 2004. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan A-1 APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY SURVEY Fort Segarra Community Interview Questionnaire The United States Army Corps of Engineers is investigating portions of Fort Segarra to find out if anything remains from the military’s training activities. Your answers to the following questions will help us understand what is important to you. Thank you for providing your input and sharing this information with us. 1. Do you live or work within/near the boundaries of Fort Segarra? If so, for how long? 2. Prior to today, did you know about the military’s training at Fort Segarra? If so, how did you learn about it? What do you know about it? 3. Do you have questions or concerns about this site/project? 4. Would you come to a meeting to hear about our study? 5. What is the best method for sharing information with you? 6. Is there any other information you would like to share with us about your com- munity? On behalf of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. If you have any questions or would like more information, please call 1-800-710-5184. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan B-1 APPENDIX B: MEDIA CONTACTS Television Stations: Station Channel Address Telephone WTJX-PBS 12 158-158A Haypiece Hill St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 340.718.3339 WZVI – Ion 8 Barren Spot Mall Suite 8, Christiansted, St Croix, Virgin Islands 00823-4493 340.778.5008 WVXF – FOX 17 8000 Nisky Center, Suite 740B St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 340.774.2013 Newspapers: Address Contact St. Thomas Source (on-line only) Telephone: 340.777.8144 Email: visource@gmail.com Virgin Islands Daily News 9155 Estate Thomas St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 Telephone: 340.774.8772 Email: online@dailynews.vi Radio Stations: Station Frequency Format Address Telephone WTJX- FM 93.1 Public Radio 158-158A Haypiece Hill St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 340.718.3339 WIVI.F M 96.1 Pop/ Rock/ Rhythmic PO Box 302179 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00803 340.776.1000 WZIN.F M 104.3 Alternative Rock Puerta Tierra P.O. Box 948 Fajardo, Puerto Rico 00738 340.776.1043 WZIN.F M 105.3 Urban/ Reggae/ Calypso PO Box 302179 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00803 340.776.1000 WVJZA. FM 1000 News/ Talk/ Sports PO Box 302179 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00803 340.776.1000 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan C-1 APPENDIX C: POTENTIAL MEETING LOCATIONS Water Island Search & Rescue Water Island Fire Station Telephone: 340.642.5660 Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan D-1 APPENDIX D: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT TOOLS There is a range of public involvement tools used at Fort Segarra to ensure the public can find information and engage in the process. Examples provided in this appendix include fact sheets and notices. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan D-2 This page is a placeholder for public involvement tool examples, such as the fact sheet. Fort Segarra Community Relations Plan E-1 APPENDIX E: STAKEHOLDERS LIST United States Army Corps of Engineers Frank Araico Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 701 San Marco Boulevard Jacksonville, Florida 32207 Telephone: 904.232.1804 Email: Frank.X.Araico@usace.army.mil Catalina Carrasco Public Affairs Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fund. Ángel Ramos Annex Building, Ste. 202 Franklin Delano Roosevelt Av. #383San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918 Telephone: 787.289.7037 Email: Catalina.Carrasco@usace.army.mil Becky Terry Contracting Officer Representative U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center 4820 University Square Huntsville, Alabama 35816 Telephone: 256.895.1788 Email: Rebecca.K.Terry@usace.army.mil Richard Mullady Contracting Officer U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center 4820 University Square Huntsville, Alabama 35816 Telephone: 256.895.1061 Email: Richard.Mullady@usace.army.mil Michael Malone Contracting Officer Representative U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center 4820 University Square Huntsville, Alabama 35816 Telephone: 256.895.1637 Email: Michael.D.Malone@usace.army.mil Kelly Longberg Technical Manager U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center 4820 University Square Huntsville, Alabama 35816 Telephone: 256.895.1408 Email: Kelly.D.Longberg@usace.army.mil Regulator Clanicia Pelle, PhD, Environmental Engineer Division of Environmental Protection Department of Planning and Natural Resources Number 45 Mars Hill Frederiksted, St. Croix. Virgin Islands 00840 Telephone: 340.773.1082 Email: Clanicia.Pelle@dpnr.vi.gov Federal Stacey Plaskett U.S. Representative 9100 Havensight Port of Sale Mall, Suite 22 St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 Telephone: 340.774.4408 Washington, D.C. Office: 2404 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Telephone: 202.225.1790