H.T. Development, LLC v. Imperial Properties, Inc. et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 H.T. DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2007-CV-0109 v. 5 5 IMPERIAL PROPERTIES, INC., GRAND 5 CARIBBEAN PROPERTIES, INC., ISLAND 5 ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 5 BAXTER REALTY, P.C., and ISHERWOOD 5 SAN MARTIC REAL ESTATE, INC., d/b/a 5 RE/MAX ST. CROIX, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Susan Bruch-Moorehead, Esq. Todd H. Newman, Esq. Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. Douglas L. Capdeville, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS IMPERIAL PROPERTIES, INC., GRAND CARIBBEAN PROPERTIES, INC., AND ISLAND ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendants Imperial Properties, Inc., Grand Caribbean Properties, Inc., and Island Estates Limited Partnership’s Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests For Production to Plaintiff (Docket No. 54). Plaintiff filed a response to said motion, and said Defendants filed a reply thereto. Case: 1:07-cv-00109-RLF-GWC Document #: 74 Filed: 07/29/08 Page 1 of 4 H.T. Development, LLC v. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00109/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00109-0.pdf
SHA-256 7082f8cc0753f3faf42616a26514010a9c0894293f72cd9d5cc51aeadc71de66
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-7082f8cc0753
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 H.T. DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2007-CV-0109 v. 5 5 IMPERIAL PROPERTIES, INC., GRAND 5 CARIBBEAN PROPERTIES, INC., ISLAND 5 ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 5 BAXTER REALTY, P.C., and ISHERWOOD 5 SAN MARTIC REAL ESTATE, INC., d/b/a 5 RE/MAX ST. CROIX, 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Susan Bruch-Moorehead, Esq. Todd H. Newman, Esq. Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. Douglas L. Capdeville, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS IMPERIAL PROPERTIES, INC., GRAND CARIBBEAN PROPERTIES, INC., AND ISLAND ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendants Imperial Properties, Inc., Grand Caribbean Properties, Inc., and Island Estates Limited Partnership’s Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests For Production to Plaintiff (Docket No. 54). Plaintiff filed a response to said motion, and said Defendants filed a reply thereto. Case: 1:07-cv-00109-RLF-GWC Document #: 74 Filed: 07/29/08 Page 1 of 4 H.T. Development, LLC v. Imperial Properties, Inc. 2007-CV-0109 Order Granting Motion to Compel The Court notes that the parties failed to submit a joint stipulation pursuant LRCi 37.2(a). Since the matter is fully briefed, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will rule upon the papers which could be considered filed consistent with LRCi 37.2(b). However, all future discovery motions that fail to comply with the requirements of LRCi 37.2(a) will not be considered pursuant to LRCi 37.2(c). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, the Court makes the following findings and conclusions. Interrogatory No. 1: The name of any attorney consulted and the date of the initial consultation do not constitute privileged information. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.a.: This request is not overly broad, vague or burdensome. It is restricted in time and scope. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege(s). Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.iii.: The request is not overly broad nor irrelevant. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Court may find that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.iv.: This request is not overly broad, vague or burdensome. It is very specific and narrow in scope. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Case: 1:07-cv-00109-RLF-GWC Document #: 74 Filed: 07/29/08 Page 2 of 4 H.T. Development, LLC v. Imperial Properties, Inc. 2007-CV-0109 Order Granting Motion to Compel Court finds that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege(s). Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.v.: This request is not irrelevant. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.vi.: This request is not irrelevant. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.vii.: This request is not overly broad or burdensome, nor is it irrelevant. It is very specific and narrow in scope. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.viii.: This request is not irrelevant. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege(s). Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 1.b.ix.: This request is not irrelevant. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege(s). Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Request For Production No. 3: This request is not irrelevant. Moreover, in the absence of a privilege log, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived any applicable privilege(s). Plaintiff’s objection is overruled. Case: 1:07-cv-00109-RLF-GWC Document #: 74 Filed: 07/29/08 Page 3 of 4 H.T. Development, LLC v. Imperial Properties, Inc. 2007-CV-0109 Order Granting Motion to Compel Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendants Imperial Properties, Inc., Grand Caribbean Properties, Inc., and Island Estates Limited Partnership’s Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests For Production to Plaintiff (Docket No. 54) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall, within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this order, supplement its responses to Interrogatory No. 1 of said Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories and Request Nos. 1.a., 1.b.iii., 1.b.iv., 1.b.v., 1.b.vi., 1.b.vii., 1.b.viii., 1.b.ix., and 3 of said Defendants’ First Set of Requests For Production. 3. Plaintiff has waived any other objections it may have or may have had to the discovery at issue. ENTER: Dated: July 29, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:07-cv-00109-RLF-GWC Document #: 74 Filed: 07/29/08 Page 4 of 4