Smith, Shirley L v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SHIRLEY L. SMITH, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL NO. 2002-227 (STT) : v. : : VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT : AUTHORITY, et al., : : Defendants. : ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants Virgin Islands Port Authority and Virgin Islands Port Authority Governing Board’s Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim of Sexual Harassment (Doc. No. 230), pro se Plaintiff Shirley L. Smith’s Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 232), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 233), and Plaintiff’s Supplement to Opposition (Doc. No. 311), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED. S/ James T. Giles HONORABLE JAMES T. GILES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (Sitting By Designation) Case: 3:02-cv-00227-JRS Document #: 392 Filed: 09/03/08 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_02-cv-00227/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_02-cv-00227-7.pdf
SHA-256 70fd46bea7319e47971a1caaa06b6db5fa1dd12dfcd9df4d97a0240a5c42921b
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-70fd46bea731
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SHIRLEY L. SMITH, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL NO. 2002-227 (STT) : v. : : VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT : AUTHORITY, et al., : : Defendants. : ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants Virgin Islands Port Authority and Virgin Islands Port Authority Governing Board’s Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim of Sexual Harassment (Doc. No. 230), pro se Plaintiff Shirley L. Smith’s Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 232), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 233), and Plaintiff’s Supplement to Opposition (Doc. No. 311), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED. S/ James T. Giles HONORABLE JAMES T. GILES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (Sitting By Designation) Case: 3:02-cv-00227-JRS Document #: 392 Filed: 09/03/08 Page 1 of 1