VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Waterborne Pathogens

Collection
University Records
Sub-shelf
uvi.edu
Kind
Government Report
Island
St. Thomas
Pages
61
Text
OCR Text

"| WATERBORNE. PATHOGENS OP THE U.S. VIRGIN TSDANDS ae Project No. 02 a a oe it “ 20. ; 42-08-0001- 6-935 2 september 1906 -Pechnical Report ‘No. 25° “Caribbean . Research. Institute College of the Virgin Islands - ‘st. Thomas + U.S. Virgin: Islands - 00802 . 7 “submitted in ‘Partial ‘Pulfiliment . of Contract Obligations. tor wre Water Resources: Research Center. : “TECHNICAL ‘REPORT ‘NO. 25. -CARIBBEAN RESEARCH | INSTITUTE oo, COLLEGE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST. ‘THOMAS i U. Ss (VIRGIN. ISLANDS _ BOB02 PROJECT NO. 02 _ AGREEMENT NO. 14~08-0001-G-939 athe. “ peséatch’ on whitch - the report is: based” was financea in > | part. by. the. ‘United States Department. of. the Interior, Geological ‘Survey, “through the Virgin Islands “Water : we _. Resources Research Institute." "contents of this. publication do not” necessarily ‘reflect the -views and policies. of the: United States ‘Department . of 7 the Interior,. nor: does mention of trade: names. or ‘commercial products : constitute _ their) “endorsement. by the OU, See Government . …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.uvi.edu/files/documents/Research_and_Public_Service/WRRI/Waterborne_Pathogens.pdf

SHA-256 72fa3adfd07306afa3107a8f5b91476abadab6b76596ada793f5bd19297d5a72

Re-using this document

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-72fa3adfd073

Document text

"| WATERBORNE. PATHOGENS OP THE U.S. VIRGIN TSDANDS ae Project No. 02 a a oe it “ 20. ; 42-08-0001- 6-935 2 september 1906 -Pechnical Report ‘No. 25° “Caribbean . Research. Institute College of the Virgin Islands - ‘st. Thomas + U.S. Virgin: Islands - 00802 . 7 “submitted in ‘Partial ‘Pulfiliment . of Contract Obligations. tor wre Water Resources: Research Center. : “TECHNICAL ‘REPORT ‘NO. 25. -CARIBBEAN RESEARCH | INSTITUTE oo, COLLEGE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST. ‘THOMAS i U. Ss (VIRGIN. ISLANDS _ BOB02 PROJECT NO. 02 _ AGREEMENT NO. 14~08-0001-G-939 athe. “ peséatch’ on whitch - the report is: based” was financea in > | part. by. the. ‘United States Department. of. the Interior, Geological ‘Survey, “through the Virgin Islands “Water : we _. Resources Research Institute." "contents of this. publication do not” necessarily ‘reflect the -views and policies. of the: United States ‘Department . of 7 the Interior,. nor: does mention of trade: names. or ‘commercial products : constitute _ their) “endorsement. by the OU, See Government . eee oe gg Thee ABSTRACT AL séries of water quality analyses were carried out - during 1985 on drinking water sources’ in the U.S. Virgin “Islands. The object of the study was to determine — which _ human pathogens might be present, the implications. of their "presence, and the ‘value of current Environmental Protection “Agency indicators for predicting the presence of pathogens. | on water samples _ were taken from seven cisterns, four wells, and five ‘places along the public water. ‘line (16 total). A four ‘liter sample was | taken at. each site and- “returned "immediately to ‘the lab’ for processing. “Each | “sample. was” checked ‘for total and: fecal. coliform. using both multiple tube and membrane filter methods: approved by the American Public Health Association and U. S. Environmental - “Protection Agency. They were “cultured, where ‘applicable, standard enrichment | “broth. and on selective media. ae Individual colonies were removed and cultured on eight "differentiating media as well as on. the APL strips (Analytab Products, Plainview, N. Yes 20 tests). me Controls 7 weve - run simultaneously. using: ‘Blanks, (no. inoculum) and “pare: cultures of eight species from the ‘American Type es ‘culture Collection | (arc) . The results of these 1800 separate tests were collated and compared for consistency, occurrence of pathogens, and "reliability, of prediction from the coliform tests. Thirty "found. 1. “species: of. bacteria, ‘twenty Of: them: ‘pathogens, This, analysis showed that: All of. the 16 “sources chad human pathogenic a bacteria present. Fifteen ‘of the 16. sources also had fecal streptococcus. Present while = of the. contaminated sources. would pass. “current “coliform 1 EPA water. ; quality. standards. Use of a "pre- ~enrichment" technique is vital. to get a true estimate of the less vigorous . pathogens and injured ‘coliforms. | Current EPA indicators used for contami- nated afinking or groundwater are, at least in: ‘the. v. Tey useless for ‘predicting. the presence or. absence. of ‘pathogens. were Further comparison (of these results with earlier work “on ground and cistern water indicates ‘that the problem may ‘be more severe and ubiquitous than. previously thought. "Recommendations are ‘made for future management, de~ tection studies, and. control. CUES “ACK NOWLEDGEMENTS ae We appreciate. the guidance of. Dre ‘verry c. : “Hazen and, the assistance of the ‘University of Puerto Rico, Department of Biology, with ‘the. analysis of ‘Legionella spp. and for. "reading the manuscript; Dr. James — MeFetters | of ‘the _— University. of Montana and ‘Dre William Fox. of the v. Se EPA “for their interest and advice. we ‘thank the Department of - seience ’ and math, and the: Vv. re Cooperative. “Extension Service, college. of the Vv. Ter for their generous loan of equipment; ‘the crt Water, ‘Resources Center ‘provided — "valuable advice and ‘support. “Finally, we want to “thank the staff of ‘CRI, for all their, help. and. @ patience. — TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT cee me GED ee Jc roman Sane Se my SMO FEE TY Gee Ge Ge em Cee eae CaO: aN Gen Got Ges SER Le GD SO ene Gre Coe Ge One anme Gone rum iil ACKNOWLEDGEMENT me eee sm a me me, cr as ee mene sn nr iss sn on, wii TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES oe dees ae cone Se are aoe eas ined Come Ge Gem WES Me CREE ne Gee ROS Cire iD oe Meee Oe Bae OY toe Vil LIST OF TABLES Soe eee ee oe ee Vill INTRODUCTION - METHODS AND ‘MATERIALS RESULTS. Oe Se eee ee Cie perme oe! come cht See es tne emcee eae Oa Ome Meee: Wem Sham We ee Gabe Smee Or tm coe cu Ge ee Gem ms ee es oe 14 DISCUSSION - 21 21 aL “Waterborne “Respiratory Pathogens: ‘b. Waterborne Gastrointestinal ‘Pathogens-~ 29 ee ‘Waterborne Disease’ and: Environmental. Health Considerations: "et ea aie come ie ee eo ees teres Se ein ec See “ines fume ane 34 CONCLUSIONS - ae are cee Se et ao ‘ame fame ee ep Yc Gt Sie ee eam ce ers ee ne es ne cee cake 38 REFERENCES. 4] APPENDICES et ee pcan AP 1 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Geographic Location Map for the Virgin’ Islands: ye es cea ee one ce ain ee er we ca cree wae ss te eae cs ne cos ee ane es acne sn ie 2. Diagram of the Main Trunk: Water Distribu- tion ‘System and Sample Stations: ae pee a naw ey i. ee ete eres dene Se 3. Genéralized Flow. ‘Diagram: ‘for Microbiological Se se Sy noe eh nny nn sd cee ee se es ed ee ee Samples~ 10 w“Vii- the: Virgin. Islands Seer erceettes | Quality. Control “Confirmation: Type Cultures Used seers are ana ee BS Ge setae paiacantes ieceireerm . Media Used In Isolation and Identification-- _ Source and Identification of Waterborne woe ; Bacteria. from the Virgin Petenep ccs Waterborne peatonella. Species” From A Comparison of: Two Indicators of ~ Contamination With Actual ‘Occurrence’ eee » Of Pathogens Humans: oe ee ae - Rtiology of waterborne. Disease Outbreaks In Le the United States, (1971- 1979 CUSTER Classification of Waterborne. Streptococci From. the V. Te and- fhe Diseases” They May Causerer Etiology of: Ve I. Waterborne ‘Bacterial - Diseases. Acquired Through the Respiratory _API- 20E Test , System asses Oleg ome Pract Si rehtorencminke nooner emerer anne nao oe - Rtdology | of V.I. Waterborne Bacteria cae ao Acquired ‘Through the Alimentary Tracto—----—— "APPENDIX. A. Classification. ‘of Medically | Important Waterborne Bacteria from the U.S. Virgin. Ts1ands ————--——— one “Appendix Be Procedures for Biochemical | Differentiation of Bacteria Using the -viii- - Pages aD 135 15. 25 26 AP 1 | significant “permanent populations. Th 1984, approximately INTRODUCTION ‘The U.S. Virgin Islands are a group of three, major islands, and. a7 smaller islands and cays clustered around the 18th paral lel. The. islands are about 1100 miles ae southeast of Miami (Pigure nD. 8 Only: the. three larger Yslands” of st. “Thomas, st. “gohn and st. croix support any 140, 000 ‘permanent "residents occupied the 60 odd square miles of land. In addition ‘beer 1. million persons a year visit the islands. ‘These visitors comprise a large ‘poten=". “tial | vector pool which could. transmit pathogens widely. - hocated in the. tradé-winds. zone the islands have” a high ve oe humidity but low rainfall. Annual rainfall varies from 20: Mo gnehes £0” 70, “inches per year ine different parts of the “. fslands. with ¢ this rainfall and ‘popllation: deena,” water’ “| becomes: a. ‘major commodity. the 4-5 million gallons of . public’ water per day. required comes — from three ‘sources: valnwater. catchment, groundwater, “and sea water. desalina- 7 thon. Of these sources. only. the desalinated public water oy is foutinely treated prior to. dist ribation. Even SO, due to an antiquated, "leaky distribution system, (see Figure 2) the: public water is. liable to “contamination before “reaching the publics All of the water, sources are cross — *SPURTSI UTATA 943 ZOz. dew uotqe007 oTyderboe9 + emnbta “sf .. epnqieg & : ae ‘Avasfauueg. “3S o- Pe IE! YS. Be Bjomop ‘ Aa epebouy NV390 OLLNVILV. ony oneng connected via unregulated commercial water “hauling truc ks, which carry” water from wells or the public. water, supply to cisterns in homes, businesses, and ‘public buildings: without cleaning the. trucks. “The. tor ad) Determine objectives of this research are. presence Or absence of common: human pathogens: in ‘the various water sources. of the v. Tey (2) to determine whether their presence has any. implications, (3) to evaluate whether the use. of Environmental Protection Agency : standards concerning coliforms is. adequate: for the various sources Of water in the Velo. ans _ ‘METHODS AND MATERIALS fs Water samples from each source (Figure 2) were . taken 7 -in four — liter sterile bottles. These bottles were kept at "ambient temperature, — transported directly to the lab, ~and » oe “analysis begun immediately. — “An aliquot was taken from the sample for conductance, turbidity and PH analysis, — zach | sample was filtered through HA and HC” membranes (Millipore, Mass.) in 5-10 and. 50 ml (duplicate) volumes. Where applicable, menbranes were preincubated on pads with oe "enrichment broths; — fOr 2- 3 hours on. laurel ‘tryptose “broth for total coliforms; Or 4 hours on. phenyl red lactose broth — at 38°C before ‘being | transferred to selective growth media, then ‘reincubated at an appropriate temperature (Canoy. and ‘gnudeen, - 1983). ‘quality control tests were run bys. a. untnoentated media for sterility, (@) using | American Type ‘culture | collection (arce), pure cultures with test samples, and (C) running : ‘simultaneous. biochemical tests on commercial media’ arid on Analytical Profile Index (API- -20E,_ 208 and = ‘Staph- Ident) I. De kits. “Anomalous tests were | “run again and also were| “queried ‘via. the API computer. “The” “APT, 208 system is a standardized, “miniaturized "version of. ‘conventional procedures for the “identification _ - Of Enterobacteriaceae ana other Gram-negative bacteria. rt ote a. ready-to-use, microtube (Bartoli, et aly 1972) system designed — ‘for the performance of 23 standard ‘biochemical ees from isolated colonies of bacteria on plating medium, Used - n. conjunction with the- API Profile Recognition — (Robertson, et al, 1976), it is’ intended to enable “laboratory. personnel to identify members of the family | oe Enterobacteriaceae and ~ “other Gram-negative bacteria . accurately _ and easily. — ‘the API system | has procedures for. game day and. 18-24 hour identification of “Bnterobacteri- ~ aceae as well as ‘1s- 24 or, 36- 48 hour identification of | : other. Gram-negative bacteria. the biochemical identifica- — tion of Salmonella arizona, Shigella, Escherichia coli, as well as Vibrio choler ae should be considered | a. presumptive - identification and confirmed agtplogiestiy. © specimen Collection and Processing . - . "Samples were ‘collected at 0700- 0800. at the » “gtations shown in Figure 2, ‘transported to the laboratory, immediate- oly after collection, and ‘processed beginning at 0900. Care “was used in proper selection. of adequate plating media and the ‘conditions of incubation. _ For the API. 208, “blood d agar -9-" ) suotzeis: etdues g, we4sdg: uoTANgnszysta yunay: us en auy jo werberc > -z armnbta SSE AE rane: sim. ames oR oe oe a . oe -7 : FW allolavHo a ae ‘plates. or. “MacConkey" Ss agar were streaked for. “initial i enrichment _ and isolation of colonies ‘to run through “the biochemical | testa. The APL system is standard for medical microbiology. | ‘Chemical and Physical: Principles “The ‘API 205. “system consists of microtubes containing — "© gghyarated® aubstrates, These: substrates “are reconstituted es by adding a bacterial suspension, incubated so that the or~— - ganisms | react with the contents of ‘the tubes, and read when eerie ‘the various indicator systems are affected by the “meta- bolites or “added reagents, generally after 18-24 hours in- “‘eubation < at 35- -37° es : "Components os | ‘The procedure for. each of the tubes _ are given in- = “Appendix B. “The: ONPG tube: contains an ingredient — that ee _ functions as an internal indicator. The ADH, LDC ’ ~ODC. and or URE tubes contain phenol red as. the indicator. The crt, os GLU, | MAN, INO, SOR, RHA, SAC, MEL, AMY and ARA tubes con- _ tain | charcoal _and the H. s tube contains iron salts as. "indicators. “the TDA, IND and VP tubes contain TO, oO . "indicator. — ALL. (of ‘the. tubes contain buffers, and tubes, with: the exception of the CIT, and URE tubes, con-_ | tain | peptone. All of. ‘these | "components retain “their "reactivity £ for 18 ‘months. ae Ident srveattee PE Brant ast “Identification of. the organism can “be: made either with ‘the. aid of API differential charts, or by using the compu-_ ter. Profile Recognition system, ‘when ‘differential charts are. used to determine the _— faentity of. cultures, — ‘the: aggregate reactions given by the _ostrains. should be ‘considered as. a whole. — Even when this is” ~ done, - however, the conclusions “reached. may differ “from laboratory to. laboratory. — | | wes | , "For rapid identification. of . Species and — biotype levels, the APL Profile Recognition system (PRS) , Computer) "Service cand Analytical Profile. Indexes. are ‘available. A “data ‘base. compiled” ‘from. strains of the ‘collections of deveral institutions as well as type and neotype cultures _ allows | very precise statistical calculation and thus ‘the identification of less | conmonly occurring microorganisms. “Quality Control cae Biochemicals "incorporated into the APL (20E system are: ae controlled by standard testing procedures prior. to. their usage in the systen. " Each lot is controlled with . a stock cultures for: sensitivity and specificity. Because. of the. use of lyophilizea cultures for quality control ‘procedures, several ‘transfers. were made prior bo the inoculation, ae : , oer recommends that quality, ‘control be- done. using the 18- 24 hour procedure. Same day results for ‘the recommended = ATCC cultures are available from Technical Services, _ API for: 1. Klebsiella pneumoniae. . ATCC 13883 2. Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047 3. Proteus vulgaris ATCC 13315 4. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC (10145 - APT differential charts. have been derived ‘from type ‘and neotype cultures and strains from various “collections. ane 4 percentages obtained on API- may differ from percentages "appearing in ‘Published material based. on. macromethods. For example, the urease test found on API is a~ Ferguson — . (1948). formulation | which ae less sensitive Ose than ae Christensen’: Ss. "formulation which is used | widely in existing oe macrotechniques. - Reactions recorded as delayed “Positive with macromethods generally are “shown, as negative on the APL chart. ‘for Enterobacteriaceae since ‘this chart. is based on results | obtained exactly after. 5 or within 18- 24 hours . Of incubation depending on the. ‘coordinate parallel standard tests being carried on at the ‘same times * Figure 3. Generalized Flow Diagram of Microbiological ‘Samples. . . L “Three Dilutions: vast 50 ml to 100 ml on ae ate eee ea oe ‘Membrane to Enrichment Broth | Quality Control == =. 2 Or 4 hr. iae" ome . Culture Organisn . :-¢g_, For Media Perfor- . : for sterility cheek. (Confirmation Tests Set A). American Type -flance plus blanks & , "Key n Selective media a ‘aacond "x25" pifferential Media - feonetemtson Tests set 2B) ae Bative. (end) & Negative Lg : Qu wality ‘Control APT Test. ‘Strir Media Sterilit : -mhujca1/Bioctentcal . Characterization Media APIS ~Test: ; me = The ‘first “quality control. effort is made by setting — aside 7 1s of ‘the | containers with “uninoculated media, which - is watchea for contamination. A second - “quality — "assurance _ “measure involved inoculation of each nedia with pare | culture bacteria from the American. ‘type, Culture Col- 2 lection z (amec) “(Table 1) and observing _ their, relative reactions. The final confirmation was a comparison of Ana=_ lytical Profile Index (API). test strips with “standard PH, 1984), characterization medias. Aree 4 Table. i. “quality Control Confirmation: Type Cultures Used Difco Bactrol Diske | (Lot + ice 32- 2 and Lot # 1656- 32-1) ATCC 8100 - Serratia marcescens "ATCC #13315 - Proteus vulgaris ATCC #27853 - Pseudomonas aeruginosa - ATCC # 23355 - Enterobacter cloacae _ ame # 13048 - Enterobacter aerogens 25922 -— Escherichia coli. 8090 ~ Citrobacter freundii - apcc #19606 - Acinetobacter calcoaceticus; var. anitratus ATCC 14028 - salmonella typhimurium 19615 - Streptococcus pyogenes BTCC. # $ # # $ # . "—amec #13983 - Klebsiella pneumonia ; : $ $ $ # 25923 - s staphylococcus aureus. - ay / ance # 12228 - § Staphylococcus | epidermitis oe ‘Table 2. “Media used In Isolation and. ‘Tdentification _—-mEndo-Agar-LEs ‘MFC-Agar a mStaphylococcus Broth. - mBrilliant Green Broth mBismuth Sulfite Broth. -mTetrathionate Broth Base ‘Phenol Red Lactose. Broth © “Plate Count . Agar Brain-Heart Infusion Broth -. Brain-Heart Infusion Agar 9. : . Brain-Heart Infusion Agar: w/5% blood - Nutrient Broth: — ; “Simmons Citrate Agar MR-VP Medium ~ Tryptone: Urea Disk ae , Lauryl Tryptose ‘Phosphate | Broth Brilliant. Green Bile Broth 28 “EC Broth. © fel kes (Oxidation-Fermentation Glucose ‘Medium Me - Levine EMB Agar... ee ae Bismuth Sulfite Agar ~ 8/S Agar: Pseudomonas. Isolation. Agar. Motility GI Medium — - Rabbit Plasma. w/EDTA XLD Agar oo , -. Sellers Agar - Hectoen Agar . _ MacConkey Agar ee a _ Triple Sugar Iron Agar - Yersinia. Selective Agar - DNase_ Test Agar w/Methyl Green -. Decarboxylase Base (Moelter) w/tysine. _ Arginine & “Ornithine | Nutrient Agar. : KCN Broth Base. -Phenylalamine Agar . -- Bile Esculin Azide Agac: KF- St reptococcus-Broth<KF- Stteptococcus: Agar : - Phenol Red Lactose Broth w/Rhamonose ~.. |» ~ Phenol Red Lactose : ‘Broth w/Melizitose - BE. Coli OK Antiserum Poly A, Lot 2677-47 {Biteor, Be cou OK Antiserum Poly B, ‘Lot: 2731- “47. (pizee) - ae RESULTS S AS can. be seen” from Tables” 3 A-c there. isa wide variety of bacteria in “virgin Islands water. Further~ oc mope:’ certain bacteria, ‘Klebsiella, streptococcus, and - Acinetobacter species ‘were found in. every sample. regardless _ of origin. | “OF 16 samples. in this study, 8 were “positive for the human fecal indicator organism Escherichia coli, and only ; 3 of the 8 showed. fecal coliforms: were in numbers above EPA "guidelines. — of these. eight samples seven showed | Standard . plate. Counts in excess of i million a xs 10 6) per 100. ml. ~ presence of E. coli. however, would have failed to predict the "occurence of pathogens in three sources (Samples 261, 265, 268) while ‘total ‘coliform and total plate counts dia. ‘No. dis- we " cernabie pattern exists ‘for relating E, coli “to. tossing other than general enteric bacteria. Fecal “streptococcus “however: occurred in 15 of 16 samples and could ‘be related to oo both the number of. pathogens: and the Standard Plate count (See Table 3A). the “largest: number of pathogens were “found in the St. a ‘Thomas: potable water distribution system, increasing in - : “number: directly proportional to the distance from the: “holding tank. “(see Figure, 2. oe ‘Table BAL | "source and ‘Ydentification of Waterborne : ‘Bacteria from the Virgin Islands. " Geaue lon /eampi: Number. _Source SS Shanes 2 #2520 Fe Cistern Streptococcus faecalis residential. - Ss. faecium (Group D.)- vo Escherichia coli,. ~ Bs “Coli, (A, S+) Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitratus. Kluyvera s SP. “napa acglomerans: (alt, Erwinia). : 2 Neesnonae hydrophilia wey #253 «= Cistern —_ streptococcus. faecalis oop Soo pegidential .—_ pe or a - Elavobacterium meningosepticiun no ‘Pseudomonas fluorescens #254 ——=—=—*Ss«sCistern, streptococcus faecalis’ en , Public. Se faecium {Group D) E oo Housing Escherichia coli A¢inetobacter colcoacet tena aan fe ESE _var. anitratus- Pseudomonas ae rug inosa Citrobacter freundii- a, s+) - Enterobacter cloacae _ Morganella morganii Proteus mirabilis ee iaeioistioon © a oe ~ Location/sample Number ge Source _ 4255 a - Cistern, — Public _. Housing _Organism a Streptococcus. faecalis _-Enterobacter cloacae “Aeromonas ‘hydrophilia oe Enterobacter. agglomerans ~ Pseudomonas sp. (£luorecent ES, group) | Escherichia hermanii ~ _ (CDC Group IT) _ Proteus vulgaris - BR. mirabilis — $2560 cistern ee residential S ok - Rlebsiella pneumonia $2570 @istern: fos residential — Soa ‘Klebsiella pneumonia "Staphylococcus simulans ne gs. saprophyticus og streptococcus faecalis “Escherichia ‘coli (Poly “pl pos. . E. coli at &. “Be ‘neg. yo _ Enterobacter cloacae OBS sakazaki ‘Escherichia herman ?i (CDC. Group TI) Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitratus | ‘streptococcus faecalis _— tocation/Sample ere : : - _._Number_ Source Pee Organism. Enterobacter cloacae’ / Pseudomonas ee Pseudomonas: aeruginosa oe Escherichia coli (poly "a pos. /™B™ neg. y ok Plavobacteri m breve. es (non-sachrolytic) Aetueeapsekes galeoaceticr, “VAL: Lwoffi” 4258 aS Cistern og Streptococcus faecalis pesidential | ‘Enterobacter: cloacae. a “Citrobacter sp. "‘Rlebsiella terrigana : - Pseudomona aeruginosa simulans . - staphyloccocus s “Streptococcus faecalis 4259, glee uey keeidential . : - Acinetobacter caleoaceticus _- Elavobacterium neningosepticun oe is Staphylococcus. henolyticus -4261——~—~S*«é tab Le _ Streptococeus: faecalis eae Ce Water (VIO. ene eee -- Intern. Reve) ae mabe “3A ‘Con't. doe ‘Locat ion/Sample Number. — — _Source #261 ‘Con't Potable. _ Water ~ Organism Klebsiella terrigana Escherichia coli (Poly A. neg/ Poly B nes} Enterobacter cloacae Bs. sakazakii- Ee a gglomerans Klebsiella planticola “Vibro fluvialis - providencia rettgerii Klebaielle oxvtoca ~ ‘Kluyvera s SP. Water System: _ Sapbaee - Enterobacter aerogens. ‘Aeromona hydrophylia — Serratia marcescens” Acinetobacter calcocaceticus ie “Vare anitratus "Pseudomonas putida "Staphylococcus hemolyticus - Streptococcus faecalis: Klebsiella ‘pneumonia K. planticola eo a ‘terrigana | Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ma _ war. ‘Lwoffi- - 5 Jecablon/saiele “Table 3A Con't Number Source _ a Oraanisn nie #263 000 Well ae "Streptococcus faecalis. od : (CRI) . Be faeciun ; Citrobacter freundii. (H, ser indale ~)- streptococcus avium #2660 Well S$ treptococcus faecalis ee (Private) —— Escherichia coli. H. 28+) ("Poly A" ++) areal os ge coli ("poly Bt +). | ‘Klebsiella planticola | ‘Enterobacter cloacae Aeromonas. hydrophilia . ‘Staphylococcus: wacrentutices S #267.» Potable "Streptococcus faecalis J ME SOS inaiiggt we -. System. ‘Keinetobacter calicoaceticus ~ We Vet- var. anitratus — ) -eran's) . -Drive |. A, calicoaceticus (Public. ©... var. Lwoffi 9 E Enterobacter cloacae EL sakazakii Klebsiella pneumonia — " Elavobacterium odoratum 2 | “Chromebacterium ‘tvehiflavorun “Table 3A Con't —— | Nocation/sample Poe ge T Number____. _Source_ ____Grganism #267 Cont" d ae 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Staphylococcus xylosus | #268... St. Thomas __ tA oe dae ne Airport. _ Stkeptecocens fsecalis fountain) - Acinetobacter calcoaceticus . sep ets var. Lwoffi . "Pseudomonas cepacia P. fluorescens ae Group IVE - (possibly) Alcaligenes _GEOUD ; ee "Klebsiella pneumonia "Enterobacter sakazakii eas BE, agglomerans A study of the occurrence and etiology of “waterborne — diseases — in. the U. geo (Table 4) shows only those diseases “causing gastrointestinal illness and ignores known respira- oe tory, skiny. and genitourinary tuberculosis, Streptococcus infections, etc... “Still this. record indicates that 553. Of Aa gastroenteritis. ; were of unknown" origin. . ‘From, a ‘public health standpoint the implications are amazing. “Well over hale the true potential for waterborne diseases. is ina "blank" data, a area, - 20- ee DISCUSSION "Organisms of ‘Concern “Waterborne | Respiratory Pathogens (see Table 6 for Btiology), Respiratory diseases are ‘not generally considered to- 2 “be waterborne. but in. “fact many” are spread by microscopic _ droplets (foamites) ‘from fountains, showers, sprinklers, or "wet" - air conditioners. The ‘most dramatic. of “these "diseases recently has. ‘been Legionnaires! Disease which by a. - social/environmental. fluke achieved - ‘national “attention. Other. — non-pneumococcal pneumonias include ‘Klebsiella, "Staphylococcus, — and Streptococcus as well. as. various gram negative Enterobacter, ‘Proteus, Serratia, and Pseudomonas. These are ‘opportunistic. pathogens which are seldom epidemic and generally strike the very young and old and the already — a ill or 4immuno-compromised individual. | oa , “Ninety ‘four ‘percent of the drinking water, tested in, = ne. Vv. S was, found to. be contaminated with ‘Streptococcus — bacteria which can cause respiratory infections. Further- more, 1s. of “16 ‘samples had ‘one. or more other species. of "bacteria. implicated in respiratory disorders. The species — involved ar “from the genera ‘Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, — aa: ‘Elavobacterium, Klebsiella, Moraxella, Pseu- o - a domonas, ‘Staphylococcus, — and ‘Streptococcus (Tables 3A-C ee sya ~The” most common genera, occuring in 758, o£ the. samples, — . ‘were o pathogenic ‘Enterobacter, “‘Kiebsiella, ‘streptococcus, and Pseudomonas, _ Acinetobacter spp. Bight ay ae the. 16. samples included a study on the | ‘presence “of " Uegionella s SDD. Of these 638. were: positive: for Leaionella a peumophilia (Table 3B). . "Legionnaires! disease was named for the first ‘recog- nine epidemic which began with an. ‘American Legion Conven- ee ee tion in 1976. In ‘retrospect it is. now known that epidenics i have occurred back cat. least as far as 19a. of “the established 22, species of Legionella the ere * ganism ce pneumophila is the major Pathogen. Probably f common - environmental sources. of infection “are. sprays, oe showers, and cooling towers. “It has been ‘found in: a vari- — = & ety of waters: in ‘Puerto Rico” “and “the ‘Virgin Islands. “the causative organism initially found in. the v. Tein A edaeeen water (Schlechy et aly 1985) and reconfirmed Be Ss Ragen, ‘Knudsen, and /Canoy. (1985), has now been isolated. oS from (drinking - water” “supplies. “Five. serogroups of pee " pneumophi ila were identified in “this. study: and more ee extensive. sampling could possibly bring the number to ten | : Or more. | The. greatest health risk is. ‘not ‘from drinking water - but from showers, humidifiers, — nebulizers, or inhalation therapy machines. ‘The high risk’ groups” are infants, aged, Or medically compromised persons. teed leased Ob 0 OE OS Od ort mw "OO mo ord s @ o pt ® ort et | COUN OHV mat VY Vv mee HARA et oo ooo oo°o Aantal |. RRM OM OM Se Hist oA HAN: Ho 8 2 ° | orl tet r wl NOV AY Vv scl net anata ANN ooooooceo Seals es et fas me mM MM ONAN rit ord ® ® 2N e rte =) ANAM Vv tay y cet NAR NN Stes oO 0 & Aaa ooo 00000 HW ort oe ON HMM KO dN WOM. in-en o.oo Ov 1G e J 9 et: e eee Man! raced ei anAoOVnAV 44) Oy = es =) C.0 DO ord net woe w= VY ooh HM: O NAAN A on COooo0.0000 Qa OM aA edetedtet ei Bw oO fan Ore elie tieMa ni elieMelial Oo 6 et “tr ae bd] o. s | . eHrt GB waranty ved ord gen ame s ROR dda NAS HO AM sd Voom lon onto u's ims) Fs * NAAT ATA ALN = auntoa otdues Tw oot aed aie. °° 3 fat Ww uuntoo UT paastt sainbTy “Tiw oan: Ooh TS : - $[TTaM worzy satTdues”. f. ITOAOSeI ‘wia4sto queuyoqeo yoor wory setduegs ~~ nas 293M aTqezod. otTqnd: wor -sotdues. 7 oe 6 (TH) Bi i. for es dor: x Oe fe ot Se OE MOT 9 Cae eee ge ee ee Wee oe a ee ee er ee ; OT X-9°S Re : eS T9t ee en mys ZO. 8S%. f°0. LST e 9°T 9ST. OLX 6°L ©. .SS% ere 9°T Cr ee ee i rt Te a 4 zi + OO: ral tert oOo © e. 8 8 AFTOLTODMNHHKEWOOUNrN, AANA MOTRONN OANA LT N ee £4 eK Eve EGS Qo 6 ra VERO RD MONO As * Ou LO 0 10 10 ats ts ei ess satoads | ee ‘ qunop. ae aan) sno000 “(aw ‘WIOSTTOD ne _ ouabouaed “JO-°ON. .. eqeta prepueas car : 0309198 Teo8a” So RD IT eee (Gees Leite eee Bye ie Pre a. ee eee N : ate se - guaboyzea Fo gouazin990 ‘Tenqow ces ee : uoTABUTUeAUOD yo si0qeoTpUL ond 30. uostreduoy W. 0e etaen Hepatitis: A ‘Table Sa a ‘Btiology OE Waterborne: Disease outbreaks in fee ee the United L ptated 1971~ ~1979 | ; “Outbreaks” fpenegeey’: "Acute Gastrointestinal. ‘Illness Ba BS ‘Chemical Poisoning es woe Bere Dae an ‘Giardiasis oe ee ee “1 eo "shigellosis salmonellosis viral Gastroenteritis cee "typhoid : | " Toxigenic. EB. oli Gastroenteritis Campylobacter Gastroenteritis: es Se fegt es “From Us. EPA; 1583. WAssesenent” of. Merobioloay ‘and Tur- ee oe bidity Standards for Drinking. Water". Proc. Of Workshop” nes CNETS A EPA 570- or 83-002).- ce i i se STA Tpaesopug sete. [equa “2° SOTZeD. Tequaq -_ STI Tpredopug ~ pags Uf Bah -. satxed- Tequaq . ESE So oo SEPEPABOODUR a gates requag pe ee STAT PIBDOpuy SUT DOFUT gory Axeutay SHIEpAPOOpUE USER ST _.. Suts{Toyder4s ae 5s Stqtraewopue wo vo Se lunjted4sod _ StayBuruou pue.° “stsdes. TereuoeNy 7 " st} Tpaeoopug ~ . STZ TLydouojn.1o8wo0T) _ ST} TA} ewopte sepedtsérg (08t edut) STILL TSUO} . STV TSuATeYg Lahey DTPeumeyy. oe © “umareda sod. oar ie FON] ZOTIOIG ~ SUOTIDOFUT. ‘UTS = ot qdTowey vues to weont9 eoueysqns: YT T-uesNTY oo. ggueqsqns . 2 ayrT-weonqg » > surskqoadexig - _oTx0} “uTpTooyney OSES aseutyoideris teseptuointedy | _-. .sutsdpoqderyg . «ded prose’ stuoinpeAy ty ayeapAyoqtes H dnosy aqerpAyoqred y dnoip » xeTdwo> pte outue -oyerpAyoqred dno, _ eyexpAyogzes *9 dnosg -oqieo y dnoig efns . eudly. eydty — eudty 210g e1O8g Bqeg. _ SATIRATTES: ~ _. STPTUESTAbe - “*ej0q ‘eydte 8q Aeu yey) mn990 T25000Ader3s (I afidkin FO soTDdS’ TOYIO WY) rq ae El ui ie whed an bs - % STAOG ‘$) 0 TopeD07SAUe=UON oy (STTBDORF : *S) Toosoremay Oe Sows “FV Seseostq “TeOTUTTO. "~~ Sgonpolg re[NTTOIeLIXg “Syonporg | _ FRTNTTSO © se padg OO aoig oo ppergzoouey © Sane da Kou SoseosIa aia PUE “TA ot uous "PoddeadaLas FuLOG LeIeN Jo VOIIEDLETSSEL _ Disease Table 6. Etiology of Vv. I. waterborne Bacterial ‘Diseases aes : Aeaeired Throsah the Respiratory Tract ae Other Possible ~ Causative Entry Routes_ — Organism “upper Respiratory Infections. Pharyngitis tage (children) — Streptococcus (group A) o stre tocéceus pneumoniae og Streptococcus _ (group A). Sta taphylococcus — aureus enteric bacilli. Gram-negative. Bacterial Pneumonias Other bacterial. * pneumonias. eran ' Legionnaires' _ disease. - . heaichelia Streptococcus pyogenes _,Staphyloccus “aureus - Klebsiella ~~ pneumoniae ‘Unknown — Bneumonphila - ot Strep (sore) _ "atypical. no ee ycobacterium - Spp. (mot Me Eubereuopis) oc “Table 6. con't | - Clinical Disease: “Causative 7 Organiam «= __ Streptococeal Diseases throat — “Scarlet. fever. eg ‘sequelae of group - "A" strep infec- tions: = - Rheumatic Fever. “Acute hemorrhagic” "Streptococcus “possible . Entry Routes —_. PYOGENES Streptococcus _ ae “pyogenes — “glonerulonephri~ tis oe “Tuberculosis. peer a Tuberculosis — ee mycobacteria v0. Waterborne Gastrointestinal Pathogens (See. Table 7. ; for etiology) ws salmonella (Salmonellosis) The genus _ Salmonella occurs: Pies of man and — -. a number of birds and animals. _ Tt is normally spread via _ water or food contamination. The organism prefers. nutrient orton nedia and. temperatures of less. than 40°C | While there are. several” hundred serotypes known only” some -20=30 are — and of those only about A3- 15 normally cause ‘disease gn homanne c= The “typhoid. Fever" organism Ss. ‘typhi ‘is. the only epsaie® dtpenne epeeisic for man. ‘Salmonellosis (including typhoid) AR one time over 1800 ‘serotypes: of: ‘Salmonella were. con oeigered “separate “species. Now this has been reduced to” _ about” 200: and probably soon. this will reduce to. one or. two "serologically. highly diverse" species. while” only ‘Ss. “typhi is specific for many: humans, perhaps ‘most (Of the others, are pathogenic to “some ‘degree, “Gastroenteritis is. the generic term for ‘Salmonella good ‘poisioning. _ Various “Salmonella species: may” be in- volved” -and the source is. usually. water or food. an mary. cases” “contamination comes from ‘a non-symptomat ic person _ te ("the carrier") (Or from the animal which produced the. food, as often occurs with eggs. as “Salmonellias were found in a “well on st. ‘Croix, during a. previous: study (canoy, Knudsen Btioloay. of. V.I. Waterborne Table Te Bacteria » Acquired: Through the. Alimentary: Tract _ Clinical RAgease - Causitive ae Organism.” 2 “giles bemeinie Entry Routes. “Reate Gastrointestinal ae infect ione -- salmonellosis — Piso (bacillary — ae dysentery) - "Gastroenteritis : “Salmonella spp. | oe _..(many sterotypes) = — . Shigella spp. . "-Enteropathogenic oe Es coli ‘Campylobacter Yersinia’ ve enterocoli tica Sexual “Placental Water. - SPP. _.. Respiratory? — Water? “Bacillus. cereus fake Epidemic diarrhea Seo imureertes.. ve: “Enteropathogenic : Escherichia coli _ _ Biaamaas Coes by Ingestion of Preformed Toxin "Staphylococcal ambpx icabion 7 Staphylococcus aureus “chterotoxin Noes ° Table 7.0 —. Clinical eo . Causative. i apeage ce a Organism, Other Possible. Entry. Routes — Infectious. systematic Diseases” Typhoid Fever Salmonella 2 vey? typhi = Salmonellosis _ : alameda top Galmonella) "Salmonella cholerae~ . septicemia’ fs esuis — | re “and Garcia, 1985) but were “not definitely identifica during this study of water in. ‘the Virgin Islands. a8 Due to the generally” nigh number of Salmonella necessary ‘to cause - an. i. infection ‘and the probability, of being | "masked" by other "bacteria, a lack of disease or. colony isolates does net” _nectasantly: mean they are. absent. “The genus salmonella was isolated from a cistern. in . ste ae. in 1983 (Caney and > Rnudsen, 1983). oe ‘Shortly Fan _ thereafter a. few. isolated cases: of typhoid occurred on. Steg Croix. A study of wells in the Vv. Te in 1984 confirmed — ‘Salmonella SPP+ from two. wells on. ‘st. “John and one on St. — Croix. In 1985, the 3rd largest U. Se outbreak of. ‘typhoid occurred on. st. croix ‘totaling 66 cases hospitalized. ‘Considering, the: low level of Salmonella, even. ‘in known _ contaminated areas, detection is. snot. easy in any case. To. oe find ‘positive ‘identification ine four ‘sites was in itself “cause for some. ‘concern. — No. attempt was. made to. . identify a “the « organisms to species, which “would | have “required “serology and/or immuno-fluoro ‘techniques presently “beyond the laboratory. - | Shigellosis is an intestinal. disease — of varying severity ranging from simple ‘dysentary BO / cholera- like. symptoms. Shigella species are responsible for about 308 of the "summer dysentery" outbreaks in the 7 8. 8. ‘In ‘the. v. Ss. and “Europe shigell: La related fatanities | percent. are only about one. > percent. ; In tropical areas with poor” “health care; ‘fatalities — vin. epidemics may reach twenty - Salmone ella an and ‘Shigella spp. are not detectable using ce ihe standard indicator tests. — only. lactose | : getménting °° . "bacteria are detected in ‘standard water. tests; and except for. a few genera these are non-pathogenic. o Becherichia coli, Enteropathogenic varieties (acute | Gastroentritis) i | a are Bs gol is a normal inhabitant of the ‘human colon. | Pees as. such. it has. become the standard “indicator organism — oes for human fecal pollution. “Many scientists now. criticize this on ‘the basis ety "he “gold is not @ pathogen. Stn “actuality about. O. 5 -.. 08 of the U.S. children under 5 years of age: and 2. 2 - 3. 388 of the children in ‘developing = countries are stricken » with E Ee goli gastroenteritis (Wo . annual report, 1978). a The symptons ¢ of the disease are a profuse. watery aiarrhea, with little mucous. or ‘blood, fake : Bear Prostration and» ‘dehydration. ‘The organism apparently ee ‘excretes: an. “enterotoxin and also. penetrates the » colonic “epithelia. — with the. advent of modern antibiotics and in- _—-tervencus feeding, ‘the disease in the “developed countries eo ha ‘become only” an ) unpleasant nuisance, In developing petedey countries, and in poverty ¢ areas of. the U. Se it. is a serious, ee often fatal, disease of young children. - the isolation, of hydrogen sulfide 088) ‘producing i re E.coli from wells (Canoy, ‘Knudsen, Garcia, 1985). and from public” “drinking water. (this: study) indicates a potential — pathogenic Es goli. Due ‘to ‘the biochemistry, of this - variety | at. is not detected | on. standard” confirmed “fecal “coliform tests. S The presence of these bacteria in’ gbhe. water. is, especially for ‘infants and “medically compromised patients, of ‘concern. _ “Waterborne Disease ‘and Environmental “Health oe Considerations : potential dispersal routes: “for waterborne pathogens "Human sate. | . mus gay a "potable. Water Distribution system oe “Water: Transport | ‘Trucks, ~ gewage - -Rain/Wind . Human vectors. (as voice to “general sewage) include | “persons 4 who handle food or water or those. who» deliberately ‘spit or. excrete into. and around cisterns and wells. whis) S category» -also_ includes: ‘persons ans charge of wells, | ae trucks, and | barges who, do not. clean, or. close them properly. os ee - At ‘this time (ages), there. is no satisfactory est imate i a to. the. importance | of this vector. — In a, recent typhoid " epidenic, statements were made, but not substantiated, that "food handlers - were ‘the ‘source. — other reports. said that Q feces. “deposited around or. in the cisterns, were the “source “Sor blamed cross” contamination between “water and sewer | a pipes. ‘The importance of this vector needs to be addressed even though it is very time ‘consuming. The” ‘potable water distribution system has been. blamed — often for “allowing cross-contamination with sewage. Again “there is no good est imate of ‘Ene: magnitude of this problem. "However in the Present ‘study | six. samples were taken. along. . the | distribution dine. — The closest sample to. the. storage tanks was number 262 ‘in ‘Subbase and had two. ay potential ereeeen "pathogens. After ‘this point, one pipe goes. to Veteran’ SS "Drive West and one. to. veteran’ Ss. ‘Drive East and the town of. oes “charlotte Amalie. ‘The Veteran! 's Drive West ‘sample (267 Doo. a nine 3) pathogens, the. East Veteran! Ss. ‘Drive (264). had (2) pathogens and (261) east of town (towards: end of Line) had ‘thirteen (a3) pathogens. — Another sample, on a branch Of the system, was from. the airport and had | eleven. ay potential pathogens. ae Pee From the ‘limited number. of samples it appears that cin = gece: the: farther from the, storage and ‘treatment: site, the MNES BB oe extremely £luorescent dye ‘such as "greater numbers of total bacteria and potential ‘pathogens. “This. would: imply some. sort of cross contamination. — As critical as this factor is, a great | deal of importance should be placed on: dete mining. . the | locale — of oe contamination... ‘This | could be done in 100. samples using — “both bacterial tests at various” ‘Rhodamine B B injected into. the | sewage “lines. “It is possible that area ‘treatment — oe “should be installed o ‘other precautions taken. " Water transport — trucks are. he vate to. areas not served ‘by the public. distribution — sys- tem, Some of these trucks are owned or leased - by the ‘Housing Authority or: Public Works, however, most | are private contractors. “They all have a potential for conta~ mination | from polluted wells, public. cisterns, | or illegal : withdrawals fron the: distribution system. since there is oints in the lines, and an used to deliver. ‘drinking = “no, control on servicing, — cleansing “monitoring, these nh - trucks are potential “hasaraay “The: owners will not. permit cee - “sampling by private researchers and SO. any evaluative study wil have to have government backing. Furthermore, because of the. unique environment, “any simple. coliform test “would be meaningless. “The tests required would be a ‘Total. Plate Count plus ‘some “other — indicator, “perhaps: - fecal ; “ treptococcus, Clostridium. Aeromonas, or ‘Pseudomonas. ‘Sewage contamination’ has often been blamed ‘for lowered water quality 3 ‘in. cisterns, wells, and. the public system, The ‘type and number of bacteria found in this series of x studies _ (Rhineheart, et aly 1983; ‘Canoy, Knudsen and: @areia,. 1985) | confirm “sewage contamination but do- not "pinpoint: a single source of contamination. There are three ~ major potential sources; cross contamination “between water and sewage pipes, surface and subsurface entry from septic 7 tanks, and. runoff carrying surface wastes. No factorial es has: ever been done to evaluate these three routes. , ‘Animal vectors. include cattle, pets, wild birds, rats, es : A wobgooaeas and “reptiles or amphibians. These animals” “deposit feces “around poorly - sealed wells and cracked _ cisterns. At times not only the feces of smaller animals _ but smaller animals themselves may enter, directly into — open. cisterns or wells. “These animals carry” pathogenic. -Salmonellas, _ Strept ococcus: and atypical | tuberculosis: a8. well as a an - variety of Aeromonas and ‘Pseudomonas. Rain and wd nd “play can _ unknown tele. in barry ing, garee. pathogens into wells” and "cisterns. Road ‘dust is” . constantly being swirled up into the air to be added to water foamites: from wastes: and sewage aerators: as. well as. 23 7- dust | ‘borne on. upper winds: from as s far away as” Saharan. Africa. — This mixture can ‘then be rained out on. water ~ catchment surfaces locally. . _ CONCLUSIONS “this research has. ‘shown, ‘that ‘the private and public ~ potable water systems in the Virgin Islands are frequently contaminated with potentially hazardous bacteria. . In the “present study, and ‘two preceeding efforts; 125 cisterns, 26 wells, and 6 public water. outlets were tested. Even, though the tests. were not exhaustive for. all possible “pathogens only ‘two wells, ‘four cisterns, and. no public water outlets _ were” found to. be free of ‘the present EPA standard indicator ‘bacteria, the implications of ‘this, in terms: of basic an human health and_ high risk to infants, elderly, and medically compromised persons are dramatic. _ Special 1 moni- 3 toring and prophylaxis. “for, the high risk groups: are a “critical need. Furthermore the large influx of. tourists and “foreign immigrants in the “Vale. complicate the water - pathogen ‘situation by the introduction. of organisms and by providing © . large mobile host “reservoir because “those | east tues ) from many: ‘greap., where typhoid, cholera, “yellow fever, and other “ Mexotic™ pathogens _ still are oe active. When introduced here, transients going to the Us S. “mainland or ‘Europe could easily transfer the disease before oP faage Fe Me even identifiea like the controlled outbreaks of typhoid in -1ge4- -85. “This: “would be nothing short of an ‘economic, as well as. a 1 public health, crisis. The. majority of the pathogens found cause. one of three "general maladies: ly “Skin or wound | “septicemia, 2). "Respiratory and Genitourinary tract infections (particu- larly “Of women), 3). Gastro-intestinal infections, Less 4 : common nee. the pee atypical “bacterial pneumonias — and. tuberculosis. — ‘These bacteria are not. generally (but can oo become) | primary pathogens and so. usually become critical in already — weakened. hosts” or. cause: “chronic low level | debsnseating dcasea | a | bends “Current water: standards in the: ve I. are those wee in the U. Se for, a ‘different geography, popula- oe “tion, and water system. Neither the tests, ‘monitoring, or. oe “indicator organisms appear appropriate to the local situa oo tton. ‘These are. particularly, questionable in view of the | ee - diverse ‘sources — of water, — dissolved. organics, 2g heat, turbidity, ee and storage times Of water. Studies are - required | to provide data to. ‘develop more appropriate ‘tests wee and to. “recommend to the lawmakers. more appropriate “local “regulations for water systems: including wells, trucks, and public cisterns, “Strict” ‘regulation. of water Saeedithen and treatment, septic tanks, and ‘sewage is’ ‘required, _In addition to the physical measures called for, a massive educational effort is necessary on the part of — “" gchools, government, and civic organizations to create an informed and active public relative to water quality. REFERENCES AND CONSULTED WORKS Ole. ‘american Public Health Association, “American. water _ Works Association ‘and Water Pollution Control Federation, - 1983. “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and. ~ Waste Water, 15th ed... American Public Health Association. ‘Washington, D.C. oe ; ne 2 -Analytab. Products, ‘Inc.. isa, aebgbctec uoce. letter. Vol. 7, No. tye Mietytap Products, inc. Plainview, N. Yeo° PES OE URLS Se See VESTAS AP 7 3. Barbe, J. 1969. Otganisation: Methodique de. 1" etude . des Caracteres Enzymatiques des Bacteries de la Tribu. des ~-KRlebsielleae; application. a la classification. | Doctoral — thesis... Marseille, France, - : 7 Bartoli, Mey J. Chouteau, De ‘Bttori, D. Bonnet; G. Oe Beyer. 1972. Utilisation en Pratique Jornaliere d'une _ Nouvelle Galerie D'Identification des Enterobacteries. A. | _ propose de 671 souches. Lyon Pharmaceutique, Ve 23,033. 269- 275 4 pea oe ie SRS OE es ee 5 Benjamin, M. Ac, B.C. DeGuzman, and A.J. nea 1964." Voges-Proskaver Test; -Expeditious. Techniques « for: ‘Routine pe. os: Bacteriol. 87: 234-235. | So a 6. ‘Best, M. Guy et. ale. 1985. “Tatlockia micdaded: Growth Associated With Other Water Borne. Bacteria. “Appl. and. Environ. Microbiol.. Jane: Pe. 1521- -1522. ret FS _Blachman, — Us, M, a. ‘Pickett. ‘1978... Unusual ‘Retobic | -Bacilli. “in Clinical Bacteriology. Scientific Development, Press. Los. Angeles, CA. BL Blazevic, D. Jey “et al. 1976. Practical Quality Ee Control. Procedures. for the “Clinical Microbiology oe Laboratory. “American: Society for: Microbiology... Eee “4 Comtech: 3. ey, . - ge ‘Borner, OR. and J. winter. 1 1978. “Microbiological. - Methods for. “Monitoring -the ‘Environment, Water and. Wastes. -Environ-mental Protection. Agency,” Cincinnati; OR... ~ 106 Brenner, D. Dede ete al 1975, ten “New. Species: of ~ Legionella. International oSournst of Systematic _ Bacteriology. vans PP- 50-59. oe Sar “Brock, TD ‘s 1979. Biology: of. Microorganisms. 3rd. = ea. “Prentice~ Hall, Inc. N. a. So -12.- Buissiere, Fe 1972. ‘perfect donnement ° du. “pube d'Ivan Hall pour L' etude en Serie de la Croissance. et de . la Physiologie des. Bacteries.— C. R. Acad. “Sei. 2783 1426- 1429. Paris, France. a OES te _ 13. Burlingame, G.A., et. ae loss. J Weebbetaa pntec| oS ference with. Coliform Colony Sheen Production on: Membrane _ Aleerss Appl. and Ehyfrons Microbiol. Jan. PRs 56-60. ke Campbell, — ee et. al. 1984. ‘Legionella 2 sainthelensii: | A New Species of Legionella Isolated from. Water Near Mt. St. ‘Helens... Appi. and Environ. Microbiol. Feb. pp. 369- 373.0 15. ‘Canoy, Me M. oe ae sects . Quality In the U.S. Virgin. Islands. - Water Resources... i Resenren Canker Repeat pp. 28. up Rs anh lee gn 16... Canoy, Mey Aw knudeeng and R. Garcia. 1985. —— Grounavater Reconnaissance of ‘the: U. Se Niegin: Islands, aw ; Ciesielski, Cy Koy ats ale. 1984; “Role. of. f Stagnation’ and: ‘Obstruction of Water Flow in Isolation of Legio onella . Pneumonia ‘from “Hospital Plumbing. — Appts ‘and Environ. o Berepiol. Nov. PP. ‘984- TORT 1b. Cowan, S.T. and K.J. “steel. 1970. “Manual for: the _. Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge: University Press; Cambridge, U. Rye 19, Difco “Manual for. Dehydrated culture - Media. “andor ~ Reagents. for “Microbiology. ‘1984. Tenth ed. Difco. Reboratorieny Detroit, MIL 90. Dufour, A.P.,- ‘et. al. ‘1981. “Wembranie: Filter Methoa for. Enumerating Escherichia. colle” ve and.’ Environ. ree Microbiol. Mayr pp. 1152- “1158. pie ee Rawards, P.R. and W.H. “Ewing. 1972. “Identification ae Of Entrobacteriaceae, | 3rd ved. # Burgess. Bupa ing: Conn “Minneapolis, MN. 22. Media. and. ‘Reduecitation: on Aecuracy: on the Membrane oo Balter: Total Coliform Enumeration Technique. 1985. — MEPL van sand: Environ. Microbiol. May, PP. 144 “1151. Bea eas Aa fee oe 28: 1715-1 1720. vv d3e os Environmental Laws and Regulations of: the Virgin Islands. ©1979... Reprints from Titles 12 and 19. of the Virgin ‘Islands’ Code and the Virgin Islands Rules and Regulations. — Dept. of Conservation and: Cultural Affairs. bts Thomas; U. S. V. I. ; 24. Ferguson, W. We and A. E. Hook. “1943, Urease. Activity. | of. Proteus. and * Salmonella Organisms. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 25. Gateia, Rey M. Canoy, and A, Knudsen. 1984, Recon~__ -naissance of: Groundwater ‘Quality in’ the U.S. Virgin = Islands, July. “USGS. Technical Report: #20. 96S Geldreich, E. Ee, H.D. Nash, D. J. Reasoner, and R. H. a - -Maylor. 1972. The Necessity of Controlling Bacterial. ae .. ulations In Potable Waters: Community’, Water. Supply. Je Am. Water Works: association. 64: 596~ =602. 27. Geldreich, E. Ee. 1975. Handbook for. Evaluating waters Bacteriological Laboratories, Second ed. “Bags EPA~670/9- D5 “006.00 8. ; a 28. Geldreich,. . Ee E., and He doyle. ees weed, Quality and Health “Significance of EE AREER CORE 2 a OE Pollution. ‘CRI Press. e 29. Gerhardt, Pp... 1980. Manual of Methods for General - Bacteriology. . American — Bootety ” for. Microbiology. _. Washington, D. C. 30. Glardi, “Giles. 1978. Glucose. Nonferment ing Gran- igetge Bacteria in, Clinical Mieroblology. CRC. Pressey oa 31. Gpaceon: we Gomez-Gomez, and senieee: 1977. _ Methods for collection and aquatic biological and. micro- biological samples: U.S. Geological Survey, — Techniques aes _ of Water Resources. Investigations. Book 5, Chapter 14, p 332. an - | . 32. aaa and A.M.B. Desbresles. ne AO > Propose © - de. Utilisation. ‘d'une... Micromethode -d'identification des Enterobacteries. Rev. Inst. Pasteur. | at 71-78. Lyon, France,. TES . 33. "h ‘Hazen, om, AL Rnudsen, and M. ‘Canoy, “yong.” ee tee spp. .in Tropical Water. Puerto Rican Medical oo a “ Seetety. (in. press). : rcs eee oe eee 34. Hsu, _ i. Cy : et.al. 1984. Isolation of Legionella BER Ss from Drinking | Water. Appl. and. Environ. Microbiol, ye Sotaan:: D. G. and 0. 3. ‘Cosner. 1973. A survey of the - Water Resources of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands: U. a. Geological Survey open-File Report, (unnumbered) , Pp 55. OS 365. Kohn, J. 1953. A Preliminary: Report. of A New Gelatin Pagutest ton Method. oe Clin. Pathol, 6: 249. m4 37. Kovacs, Se ‘1928, ‘Bine _vereinfachte Methode “gum -Nachweis der indolbilding durch -Bakterien,. A. “Immunforsch . 55:311.. ane mae a 3a Kovacs, N. 1956; 7 Identification of. Pseud omonas pyo= = yee cyanae by. the oxidase reaction. Nature. 178: 703 s 39. “LeChevallier, MWe y- et al. -j984, Evaluation of ae Agar as a Fecal Coliform Medium. | ‘Appl. and Environ. = Microbiol. Oct. Pe. 371- ee 40. LeChevallier, “M.W., et al. 1983. A New Medium for - Improved — “Recovery of Coliform - “Bacteria — from. Drinking. , Mater. Appl. and. Environ. Microbiol. _ Feb. pp. 484- 492. Ale LeChevallier, _ M. Wey | Ge eee Macreters. 1985. mode a ee Between Heterotrophic_ Plate Count Bacteria --and Coliform Organisms... Reprint. ‘Dept. (of. Microbiology. . Montana State University. “Bozeman, MT. 42. Le Minor, Le 1972. be Diagnostic de Laboratorie _ . des: Bacilles a. Gram Negatif ‘Enterobacteries. Tom 1, . 4th — oS “Edition. Editions. de: La Tourelley: S. “Mande-94 Franeé.: abe Le Minor,” Le and F. Ben. Hamide. 1962. -Avantages. ae “La: Beta-galactosidase Sure Celle de la. Fermentation: du . - Lactose — en . Milieu. Complexe - Dans. .le. Diagnostic - “ --... Bacteriologique, en: ‘particulier des Enterobacteriaceae. Ann. Inst. “Pasteur, 102- ne61 ~277. : . ore Lennette, rT. 1980. "Manual: of Clinical Microbiology. ae ed. American ‘Society for Microbiology. Washingtons. +.’ ogee “Lennette, © E. Bey oR. A. spaulding and t. yop. evant; - Editors. | 1974. Manual. of Clinical Microbiology, 2nd ed. g Rverican Society. for uierobiology, Washingtony” DC. z ae ae AGL MacFaddin, he FP. 1984, Biochemicas Tests for Sndeno-" ~ tification of Medical Bacteria. Second ed. Williams and... - Wilkins. Baltimore, MD. 47. Mitchell, R 1972. Water Pollution Microbiology, John Wiley and song. New York, oN, ¥. , , ee 48. Mitruka, — B.M.~ 1976. “Methods of Detection and Tden— eens oy tification of: Bacteria. CRC PIOSS; ‘Inc. FL. care 49. Moeller, Vv. 1955. Simplified Tests for Amino - eid. a aos Decarboxylases. and. for Arginine case System. Acta ms 2 Pathol. Microbiol. Scand, 363 158- 172. 50. ‘Morris, Rey, Key et al. “1980. © Legionella ‘gormanii. sp. Nov. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Nov. PP. 718- -721,. BE National - ‘Réadeny. of ‘Science. and National Academy a Of Engineering. . 1973. Water quality criteria - 1972. A report. by the: Committee on Water Quality Criteria, ©. .» Environmental Protection Agency... Washington, . Dd. ee tcUs S. on , Government Printing— Office. Pe” 594... 5 i 52. Nielsen, Ba B. 1971. Et nyt ingsijectocehactinegenbie” til identifidation af Salmonellabakterier | (Enterobac— teriaceae). Saertryck af Medlemsblad “for: ee danske Pet _ Dyrlaegeforening. 54: :951- 95. 53y “Nord, : Carl- ~Eriky A. A. ‘Lindberg. ana A. ‘Dahlback, 1974. cade Evaluation of five test- -kits” ~ API, . Auxotab, Enterotube, ~~ ~. ~Pathotec - and r/b ~ for identification Of Enterobacteria~ ~geae. Med. ‘Microbiol. _ Immunol. 459% 211- 220. ao a Orrison, L.H., et al. 1981. : ‘cnacackeriavtis of -*- Enyironmental “Tgolates OF Legionella pneumonia. , Appl. and. Environ. Microbiol. waly PP.. 1o9- “115. moe . 55. Ortiz-Roque, Coy T. Cc. Hazen. 1983. Legionellosis. and. Legionella spp... in the Waters of Puerto Rico. Bulletin — Of the Puerto Rico Medical “Association. 75: 403= 407. 56. Pickett, M. J. “1980. Nonfermentive Gram-Negative Bacilli.. A Syllabus. for Detection and. Identification. _ Scientific Development | Press. Los Angeles, CA. 57. ve Pipes, WwW. On. 1982. Bacterial -tnaioatore of. Pollution. CRC : PROBE s: Inc. Florida, meee Ea eae 58. Powell, J.C., ét al. 1979. Comparison of EC Broth and, Medium A-1 for Recovery of Escherichia -eoli from: Frozen Snow Crab. Appl. and Environ. Microbiol. Jan. “pp. 1- Te Pare eS LAS me 59, Reasoner, “Dede, BE. rE. <geldreien. 1985. A New Medium for the Enumeration. and Subculture of Bacteria from oe Potable Water. Appl. and Environ, Microbiol. Sept. pp. . 2 939- 344. ae a , , a ea ae 60. - “Reinhart, D. J. 1980. Isolation; Identification and. Quantitation: of -Gram-Negative -Nonfermentative ~Bacilli from Aqueous. and. Aquatic Sources. Dev. Ind. “Microbiol. 20: 705- 721. es, i anne 61. Robertson, E. Aw and. JsD. "MacLowry. 1974. Mathematical ‘Analysis of the API Enteric 20 Profile Register Using A | computer Diagnostic Model. Appl. ‘Microbiol. 3: 421- 424. 62. “Robertson, E. AL; G.C. Macks “and: J. D. Machowry. 1896... - Analysis — of Cost and: Accuracy of Alternative Strategies for. Enterobacteriaceae — ‘Identification.’ ge. Clin. Microbiol. . . ; poe a - 3242i- “424. eee Sakazaki, Riichi. 1975. Evaluation of Rapid Multiple- mest Systems for Indentification of Enterobacteriaceae ae API, Minitek,. R/B ‘Enterotube. and Patho Tec. Media_ Circle. — 20227-235. 6a: -Schlech, Ww. ow. c. Paine, Seve Broom, — @. fg Gorman. 1985. -Legionnaire's Disease in the | Caribbean. - Arch, for Internal Meds a ‘V. (1482 PP. 2076-79. “ 65. * Schieman, D. As, 8. A. Olson. 1984. “Antagonism of Gram _. Negative. Bacteria to Yersinia enterocolitica in Mixed Culture. Apple and Environ. Microbiol. , Sept. “PRs Be B44, 66. Shingara, S., et. al. 1979. Magnitude. of Pollution - Indicator Organisms in Rural Potable Water. -APP1.. cand Environ. Microbiol. PRs 744- 749, 67. ‘Simmons, J. Ss.) (1926. A: ‘culture Medium for Differen- / tiating. organisms of Typhoid colon Aerogenes group. and for Isolation Of Certain fungii. J J. Infect. Dis. 39: $209— . 2Y4, ore . : 46. 68, “ginger; ee and. B. Ee : Volcani.. 1955, An. ‘Improved Ferric Chloride Test for Differentiating ~Proteus- - _ Providencia group: from other Enterobacteriaceae. Ap Appl. pl. Microbiol. 69% 303. 69. smith, WP.Ber KM read < D.L. Rhoden, and A. Balows. 1972. API System: A. Multitube method for us _ Identification of -Enterobacteriaceae. Appl. Microbiol. aa ( 2M2849—452, Cs : bees ee 70. “taylor, Wels “and D. “AGhanzar.. 1972. Catalase Test agi an. Aid to-. the Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl. Microbiol. (2a: 58- 61. 71. “Thornberry, C., et al. voee. Le eqi ionella. Proceedings of 2nd. “International ‘Symposium. “American Bopaty for. Microbiology. — Washington, D.C. ALE U.S. "Environmental. ‘Protection “Agency <° 41978. uh Microbiological. Methods for Monitoring. the: Environment. _ EPA~600/8/78/017, Sept. rae OE . | 23. U. Se. “Environmental. Protection Agency, - 1974. eee | Beinksna® Water Act. P1 93-523, 42 U.S. Code 300 g-l. — OAS oes 1976 tnterim: “Primary ‘Drinking. Regulations. — eke Federal Register Pt. ily 40:59566- “88, (40CFR 141). oS ; 75. on “1976a.. “Quality Criteria for Water. EPA 400/0-- = bbe -023. noe _U. Ss. Oeeempne PEER ag pea. Meson moe Wadowsky, OR, Me et ‘al. 1985. Effects of. one.” - Legionella © bacteria: on | Multiplication of Legionella ise ‘pneumonia. - Potable. Water. Appl. ene ane Microbiol. “May, PP. 1206-1210. Oe washington) J.Acy Il, P.K.W. Yu and W.J. Martin. 1971. . Evaluation of Accuracy of Multi-test ‘Micromethod - for Identi-fication of | _ Enterobacteriaceae. APPL ‘Microbiol. 24: 58- “61. : fe ; vn ag 1978. WHO Annual. Report. ‘World § Health | Begenizetion!” Geneva, Switzerland. PP. 79. 9. | “williams & & Wilkins. 1984. “Bergley' Ss. J cManual’ “of _ Beterminative Bacteriplogy. Baltimore, MD. ae re ee Appendix AL ee Classification of Medically Important ‘Waterborne Bacteria from the: u. we So Virgin ‘Tslands 8. Classification of Medically Important water “se . Borne Bacteria Found in the V.I. | . Classification “Disease cA. Group: Gtaiti-negative rods,” -Facultatively: anaerobic Family. I. ENTEROBACTERTACEAE Matiie. or onmot tte; differ- -entiate fermentations and antigenic properties; some - commensalistic.in intestinal | tract with. pathogenic poten- tial for extraintestinal nea tissues; some are. pathogenic _.. parasites acquired through — o _. alimentary route — ‘Escherichia Genus Tr ee ae “Es coli Genus IVs. Salmonella Boe Cp ae typhi. ta. ee as ‘Epidemic 4 diarrhea of | infants; urinary tract:. and wound infections; RORABE a” : a > myphoid Fever oo ge enteritidis Gastroenteritis, a “para typhoid, and enteric fevers (many). — varieties of this — species. may cause these diseases) Septicemia, multiple Habeas ses “Table 8 Conte ' Classification. sss Disease. OF Ae Group: Gram-negative rods, strictly aerobic ae Family . PSEUDOMONADACEAE ee Genus Tt -Bseudononas ake? : ° Us , a BR. aeruginosa BS “Burn,” wound. and ‘sys- . ce tematic. infections Be Groups. Gramonegative béaeg facuttatively anaerobic “Panily q. Enterobacteriaceae_ Motile or. nonmetile differentiated by. carbohydrate fermentations and > antigenic properties; some. conmen- - galistic. in intestinal tract with ",. Genus IV: Salmonella pathogenic potential for extra-. eee intestinal tissues; some are paths ae _ ogenic” parasites. acquired ‘through. “alimentary: route Genus I: "Escherichia os os Epidemic diarrhea of: , are Es coli poe ee infants; urinary: tract pene and wound infections; ane "turista™ S$, typhi ee fever. . Be enteritidis paige he Gastroenteritis, para~ : ; o-.. .typhoid, and enteric - fevers: (many. varieties — a of this species may - es S@ause these diseases) _ Ss cholerawsuis Septicemia, muleipie ES 8 eee _ abscesses. “Genus Vi Shigella g. Se : boise eek — boydi “ pveenéeis: . devere diarrheic. Ss. sonnei isease Genus VI: Klebsiella foe oe os ey AED 2a a pneumoniae SS. pneumonia: os, te Fey ooo Urinary: tract infec- a . tions eas os Genus 1: : Table 8 Con ' t Classification —— Disease Enterobacter E. cloagae. E. aerogenes... Es agglomerans — © Genus VII: ~ ~- Genus XII in . family Entero- -backeriaceae) Serratia. Genus IX: § ee ET Se marcescens. - Proteus P. vulgaris. ~ Genus X: Ba alrablis versinia eee : Dog Egy enterocolitica Genus XII: Erwina ake ty ta herbicola oe ‘plant: pathos -- gen) also class- pases as Entero-. “bacter scene “pamily - II. VIBRIONACEAE “Genus II: Aeromonas ~ Genera of uncertain Family Genus “Legionella - Le: pneumophila — a ee ‘apeta teuleed veda: oe Normal intestinal tract, “may cause urinary. tract a infections ~~ -.. Has caused systematic (see Erwina’ ils infection when. intro- ~- duced in contaminated. -- solutions. injected in- _ travenously — “Urinary and: respiratory - tract infections _. oo “Urinary tract and wound. infections; infant | diarrhea . Intestinal tract of oe animals and humans, may —. Gause: diarrhea, 5 ae mesenteric” lymphadeni- tis, abscesses, | iInenin- . —gitis “Has carved. ‘Byatemic ' infection when intro- duced in- contaminated ee . solutions injected intravenously," fe “Marine: environment, seafoods, may cause . acute enteritis cota wd ‘Associated with sys-_ -- temic and intestinal _ infections — ee a “Legionnaire' s. @isease: (mild. to ‘Severe ‘pneumo~ _ nia). ae o Mable 8 Con't ~ Classification — . Disease ~ “.C. Group: Gram-positive cocci, aerobic and/or. facultatively © -. anaerobic, some ‘strictly ~ ahaerebie : ane ~pamily I.MICROCOCCACEAE . Arranged in. clusters. or pack-- ets, saprophytic or parasitic, identified by coagulase, hemo-. =. — -- lysin, and pigment production _ Staphylococcus Genus II: | ay pe oo S. aureus -. S. epidermidis as saprophvticus ‘skin abscesses, impetigo —s. wound infections, pneumo-_ nia and other systemic . infections, enterotoxin- — _ producing strains cause . _.food poisoning, exfoli- - - ative toxin causes - - - -- "scalded skin". syndrome infants, other toxins. ae cause toxic shock | syn- drome.) Normal commensal of skin “but may cause. local. or systemic infections if-. ~.. introduced by contami-9 “nated sutures or instru- ments coed . ‘Associated with urinary” tract infection in. young: women Sasssisiontion ‘Disease | amily. Il. " STREPTOCOCCACEAE . Changing cocci, .commensalistic and/or pathogenic : Genus I: Streptococcus | ee oo Se Pheumoniae. a Se) pyogenes. - (usually beta-_ ~ hemolytic) Ss. faecalis” _ (enterococei") viridans’ group. . (alpha hemolytic “species that pro-. . duce greening of. blood agar); in- cludes: following | species: | Se mitis . -§, galwarius. — $. mutans Pneumonia, other sys~ temic infections — “Scarlet. fever, sore throat, erysipelas,. impetigo, postpartum. endometritis, wound. | ‘and burn infections, aon and other serious diseases . Normal intestinal tract, os . sometimes cause res- _ piratory and urinary tract infections, .—- ‘infective endocarditis. Intestinal tract of cows, -and other animals, = ‘causes: human endocar~ itis “Mastitis in cows, in i -.. humans, neonatal sep- ‘ticima and meningitis . - (infected mothers may also have sérious ae systematic disease) Sesh Normal respiratory. tract; — chronic mucosal. in-. fections: infective endocarditis “Normal ‘veapiratory tract; may cause endocarditis, - dental caries: Same ‘as above _ Major cause of. dental caries; may cause . endocarditis. : Tmpet igo shnefngitle