McAlpin Clarke v. Marriott International, Inc.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 CARMEN McALPIN CLARKE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-86 v. 5 5 MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Andrew C. Simpson, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Order of August 4, 2006 (Docket No. 32) and Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Compel (Docket No. 33). Defendant filed an opposition to each motion, and Plaintiff filed replies thereto. Being advised in the premises and being satisfied therein, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted. Nothing in Plaintiff’s said motions persuades the Court that its previous orders require clarification, modification, or reversal. With regard to both motions, the record is exceedingly clear that the period for discovery limited to Defendant’s liability closed on April 18, 2009, and the Court did not err in either of the orders at issue. Case: 1:08-cv-00086-WAL-GWC Document #: 43 Filed: 09/04/09 Page 1 of 2 Clarke v. Marriott International, Inc. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00086/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00086-2.pdf
SHA-256 798f2902713424b2f934ad95379053f2fc3251bcd511c40d1d4d10355453d060
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-798f29027134
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 CARMEN McALPIN CLARKE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-86 v. 5 5 MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Andrew C. Simpson, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Order of August 4, 2006 (Docket No. 32) and Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Compel (Docket No. 33). Defendant filed an opposition to each motion, and Plaintiff filed replies thereto. Being advised in the premises and being satisfied therein, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted. Nothing in Plaintiff’s said motions persuades the Court that its previous orders require clarification, modification, or reversal. With regard to both motions, the record is exceedingly clear that the period for discovery limited to Defendant’s liability closed on April 18, 2009, and the Court did not err in either of the orders at issue. Case: 1:08-cv-00086-WAL-GWC Document #: 43 Filed: 09/04/09 Page 1 of 2 Clarke v. Marriott International, Inc. 1:08-cv-86 Order Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Order of August 4, 2009 (Docket No. 32) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Compel (Docket No. 33) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: September 4, 2009 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cv-00086-WAL-GWC Document #: 43 Filed: 09/04/09 Page 2 of 2