Fraser, Tamica v. Kmart Corporation
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX TAMICA FRASER, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION, Defendant. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2005-0129 ORDER FINCH, SENIOR JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Kmart Corporation. Plaintiff Tamica Fraser opposes such Motion. After careful consideration and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for violation of the Virgin Islands civil rights statute 10 V.I.C. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00129/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00129-1.pdf
SHA-256 7b322b88287c0a205c3830dd6429a421ad98f403ef2c298b3b2887ad03d4f8e6
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-7b322b88287c
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX TAMICA FRASER, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION, Defendant. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2005-0129 ORDER FINCH, SENIOR JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Kmart Corporation. Plaintiff Tamica Fraser opposes such Motion. After careful consideration and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for violation of the Virgin Islands civil rights statute 10 V.I.C. § 64, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for constructive discharge in violation of the Wrongful Discharge Act, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; it is further Case: 1:05-cv-00129-TJS Document #: 151 Filed: 04/24/09 Page 1 of 3 2 ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that, with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. ENTERED this 23rd day of April, 2008. ______________/s/______________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:05-cv-00129-TJS Document #: 151 Filed: 04/24/09 Page 2 of 3 3 Case: 1:05-cv-00129-TJS Document #: 151 Filed: 04/24/09 Page 3 of 3