VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. Southland Gaming of the Virgin Islands, Inc

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2016-03-31
Pages
2
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. ) DAVID NISSMAN, Individually, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2011-0010 ) v. ) ) SOUTHLAND GAMING OF THE VIRGIN ) ISLANDS, INC., SOUTHLAND AMUSEMENT ) AND VENDING, INC., ROBERT HUCKABEE, ) III, AND JOHN DOES NOS. 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________________ ) Attorneys: David M. Nissman, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Bennett Chan, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Jason C. Hicks, Esq., Mark N. Poovey, Esq., Washington, D.C. For Defendants ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Southland Gaming of the Virgin Islands, Inc.’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 28); Defendants Southland Amusement and Vending, Inc. and Robert Huckabee, III’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 30); Defendants’ “Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Declaration” (Dkt. No. 40); Defendants’ “Joint Motion for Hearing” (Dkt. No. 43); the parties’ respective Oppositions and Replies (Dkt. Nos. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_11-cv-00010/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_11-cv-00010-0.pdf

SHA-256 7b6c4b7cc2fcf7b7bc947993e5d6af1a378ceb98f52111bb6528057b609047ed

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-7b6c4b7cc2fc

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. ) DAVID NISSMAN, Individually, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2011-0010 ) v. ) ) SOUTHLAND GAMING OF THE VIRGIN ) ISLANDS, INC., SOUTHLAND AMUSEMENT ) AND VENDING, INC., ROBERT HUCKABEE, ) III, AND JOHN DOES NOS. 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________________ ) Attorneys: David M. Nissman, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Bennett Chan, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Jason C. Hicks, Esq., Mark N. Poovey, Esq., Washington, D.C. For Defendants ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Southland Gaming of the Virgin Islands, Inc.’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 28); Defendants Southland Amusement and Vending, Inc. and Robert Huckabee, III’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 30); Defendants’ “Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Declaration” (Dkt. No. 40); Defendants’ “Joint Motion for Hearing” (Dkt. No. 43); the parties’ respective Oppositions and Replies (Dkt. Nos. 37, 42, 44, 45), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby Case: 1:11-cv-00010-WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/31/16 Page 1 of 2 2 ORDERED that Defendant Southland Gaming of the Virgin Islands, Inc.’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 28) is GRANTED as it relates to subject matter jurisdiction (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)) and DENIED as it relates to striking the Complaint (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f)); and it is further ORDERED that Defendants Southland Amusement and Vending, Inc. and Robert Huckabee, III’s “Motion to Dismiss and Strike” (Dkt. No. 30) is GRANTED as it relates to subject matter jurisdiction (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)) and DENIED as it relates to striking the Complaint (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f)); and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Declaration” (Dkt. No. 40) is DENIED, including for MOOTNESS; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ “Joint Motion for Hearing” (Dkt. No. 43) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. SO ORDERED. Date: March 31, 2016 _______/s/_________ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:11-cv-00010-WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/31/16 Page 2 of 2