USA v. BLAKE, ZACHEAUS et al.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CR-0030-07 v. 5 5 BLAINE CLAXTON, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., AUSA Martial A. Webster, Sr., Esq. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the government’s Motion For Reconsideration (Docket No. 622). This order is issued without necessity of response. The government seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Order (Docket No. 619), entered December 26, 2008, denying its Motion to Re-Open Detention Hearing. The government alleges that the “main basis for motion re-open was the fact that Claxton has been convicted of a felony drug offense (in a separate matter) subsequent to this Court placing him on release.” Motion at 1. Then asserts that the “Court’s order did not address this basis (i.e., the main basis) for detention.” Id. at 1-2. Case: 1:06-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 631 Filed: 01/15/09 Page 1 of 2 United States v. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cr-00030/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cr-00030-2.pdf
SHA-256 7b938605e91f048cbdd62c9d0d8d76bb3ac3bef11c361e0a8efc5fccb544794f
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-7b938605e91f
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CR-0030-07 v. 5 5 BLAINE CLAXTON, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Alphonso G. Andrews, Jr., Esq., AUSA Martial A. Webster, Sr., Esq. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the government’s Motion For Reconsideration (Docket No. 622). This order is issued without necessity of response. The government seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Order (Docket No. 619), entered December 26, 2008, denying its Motion to Re-Open Detention Hearing. The government alleges that the “main basis for motion re-open was the fact that Claxton has been convicted of a felony drug offense (in a separate matter) subsequent to this Court placing him on release.” Motion at 1. Then asserts that the “Court’s order did not address this basis (i.e., the main basis) for detention.” Id. at 1-2. Case: 1:06-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 631 Filed: 01/15/09 Page 1 of 2 United States v. Claxton 2006-CR-0030-07 Order Denying Motion For Reconsideration In its order, however, the Court stated, “In addition, the Court finds that the government has failed to produce any other evidence that demonstrates that the conditions of Defendant’s pre-trial release fails to reasonably assure his appearance as required or the safety of the community.” Order at 2. The Court considered the government’s evidence and found that it failed to demonstrate that detention was required. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that the government’s Motion For Reconsideration (Docket No. 622) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: January 15, 2009 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 631 Filed: 01/15/09 Page 2 of 2