Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Bahnaj et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, Plaintiff, v. RAAD BAHNAJ, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015–76 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Plaintiff, v. RAAD BAHNAJ Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015–76 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Lisa Michelle Komives Dudley Topper & Feuerzeig St. Thomas, USVI For Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Joycelyn Hewlett, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, USVI For the United States Small Business Administration, Raad Bahnaj Pro Se Defendant. Case: 3:15-cv-00076-CVG-RM Document #: 21 Filed: 08/12/16 Page 1 of 3 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Bahnaj et al. Civil No. 20015-76 Order ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the proposed Consent Judgment between the plaintiff, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular”), and the defendants, Raad Bahnaj (“Bahnaj”) and the United States of America, Department of Justice. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cv-00076/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cv-00076-0.pdf
SHA-256 802ff7020c54b5c44cec469d71474c40a9bb0033cc8ba7592c70d6087acb0d58
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-802ff7020c54
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, Plaintiff, v. RAAD BAHNAJ, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015–76 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Plaintiff, v. RAAD BAHNAJ Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015–76 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Lisa Michelle Komives Dudley Topper & Feuerzeig St. Thomas, USVI For Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Joycelyn Hewlett, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, USVI For the United States Small Business Administration, Raad Bahnaj Pro Se Defendant. Case: 3:15-cv-00076-CVG-RM Document #: 21 Filed: 08/12/16 Page 1 of 3 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Bahnaj et al. Civil No. 20015-76 Order ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the proposed Consent Judgment between the plaintiff, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular”), and the defendants, Raad Bahnaj (“Bahnaj”) and the United States of America, Department of Justice. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the Consent Judgment, docketed at ECF No 13-1, is APPROVED provided that: 1. the judgment awarded to Banco popular shall be reduced by the total amount of attorney’s fees and costs sought: $22,761.68. Any award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs may only be made upon proper application to the Court, consistent with Title 5, section 541 of the Virgin Islands Code; 2. the interest awarded to Banco Popular shall be reduced proportionately to reflect the exclusion of attorney’s fees and costs from the judgment; 3. notice of the Marshal’s sale shall be published once a week for at least four (4) consecutive weeks prior to the sale in a newspaper regularly issued and of general circulation in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which uses newsprint; and Case: 3:15-cv-00076-CVG-RM Document #: 21 Filed: 08/12/16 Page 2 of 3 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Bahnaj et al. Civil No. 20015-76 Order 4. in accordance with Title 5, section 489 of the Virgin Islands Code, “[i]f, after the satisfaction of the judgment, there are any proceeds of the sale remaining, the clerk shall pay such proceeds to the judgment debtor . . . .” Id.; and it is further ORDERED that the trial setting in this matter is VACATED; it is further ORDERED that all pending motions in this case are MOOT; it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ District Judge Case: 3:15-cv-00076-CVG-RM Document #: 21 Filed: 08/12/16 Page 3 of 3