VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Dorval v. Cashio

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2019-09-30
Pages
2
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN WILNICK DORVAL, Plaintiff, v. RONALD CASHIO Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2018-32 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Wilnick Dorval St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Wilnick Dorval (“Dorval”) captioned “Rule 55 Motion for the Clerk of the District Court to Enter Default Judgment Against Ronald Cashio.” On June 1, 2018, Dorval commenced this civil action by filing a complaint in this Court. The Complaint names Ronald Cashio (“Cashio”) as a defendant. On June 27, 2018, Dorval filed proof of service. See Proof of Service, ECF No. 17. The proof of service indicates that a process server personally served Cashio on June 5, 2018. See id. On February 7, 2019, Dorval filed a second proof of service. See Proof of Service, ECF No. 26. The second proof of service indicates that a process server personally served Cashio a second time on June 19, 2018. See id. Case: 3:18-cv-00032-AET-RM Document #: 40 Filed: 09/30/19 Page 1 of 2 Dorval v. Cashio Civ. No. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_18-cv-00032/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_18-cv-00032-0.pdf

SHA-256 81a7b571ee9059fd2c9b286c4c823cdd0f3d876230eeab67b3160dee44560e1a

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-81a7b571ee90

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN WILNICK DORVAL, Plaintiff, v. RONALD CASHIO Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2018-32 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Wilnick Dorval St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Wilnick Dorval (“Dorval”) captioned “Rule 55 Motion for the Clerk of the District Court to Enter Default Judgment Against Ronald Cashio.” On June 1, 2018, Dorval commenced this civil action by filing a complaint in this Court. The Complaint names Ronald Cashio (“Cashio”) as a defendant. On June 27, 2018, Dorval filed proof of service. See Proof of Service, ECF No. 17. The proof of service indicates that a process server personally served Cashio on June 5, 2018. See id. On February 7, 2019, Dorval filed a second proof of service. See Proof of Service, ECF No. 26. The second proof of service indicates that a process server personally served Cashio a second time on June 19, 2018. See id. Case: 3:18-cv-00032-AET-RM Document #: 40 Filed: 09/30/19 Page 1 of 2 Dorval v. Cashio Civ. No. 2018-32 Order On February 15, 2019, Dorval filed a motion classified on the docket as a motion for default judgment. See Mot. for Default J., ECF No. 29. The document itself is captioned “Rule 55 Motion for the Clerk of the District Court to Enter Default Judgment Against Ronald Cashio.” See id. In that motion, Dorval requests that “the clerk of this District Court [] enter default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedures against defendant Ronald Cashio for failure to plead and/or defend.” Id. at 1. Additionally, Dorval quotes the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) (“Rule 55(a)”). Id. at 2. Rule 55(a) addresses the entry of default after a defendant fails to answer or otherwise defend a properly served complaint. In light of those circumstances, the Court construes Dorval’s petition as a request for entry of default. Consistent with that view, the Clerk of Court entered default on April 18, 2019. The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that Dorval’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 29, is MOOT. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:18-cv-00032-AET-RM Document #: 40 Filed: 09/30/19 Page 2 of 2