PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, VS. HARIM ALMANDO PR, ST-10-CR-277 (V.I. 2012) [unpublished]
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. ST-10-CR-277 HARIM ALMANDO PRINCE Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is pro se Defendant Harim Almando Prince’s December 3, 2012, Motion for a Sentence Reduction.' For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On May 26, 2010, Defendant was charged in an Information with two counts of third-degree assault in connection with an act of domestic violence pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 297(2), 14 V.LC. § 297(4), and 16 V.I.C. § 91(b)(1)(2),” and two counts of using a dangerous weapon during the commission of a crime of violence pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2). …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://superior.vicourts.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12810747/File/Opinions/Archive/PRINCE%20MEMORANDUM%20OPINION.pdf
SHA-256 865b97e28621b1a97e77dee578a90cc2059212551f4d3405b8c8f77326a2a761
Re-using this document
edicts of government — judicial opinions are not copyrightable by anyone. NOT 17 USC 105 (territorial court, not federal) and NOT 'rights unstated'.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-865b97e28621
Document text
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. ST-10-CR-277 HARIM ALMANDO PRINCE Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is pro se Defendant Harim Almando Prince’s December 3, 2012, Motion for a Sentence Reduction.' For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On May 26, 2010, Defendant was charged in an Information with two counts of third-degree assault in connection with an act of domestic violence pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 297(2), 14 V.LC. § 297(4), and 16 V.I.C. § 91(b)(1)(2),” and two counts of using a dangerous weapon during the commission of a crime of violence pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2). The charges arose out of a May 18, 2010, altercation where Defendant ' Defendant had previously filed a Motion for a Sentence Reduction on December 22, 2010, but the Motion was denied because this Court no longer held jurisdiction due to the fact Defendant had also filed a Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands prior to submitting the Motion for a Sentence Reduction. ? Count I charged Defendant with Assault in the Third Degree - Domestic Violence, in violation of 14 V.L.C. §297(2) and 16 V.1.C. 91(b)(1)(2). Count III charged Defendant with Assault in the Third Degree- Domestic Violence, in violation of 14 V.I.C. §297(4) and 16 V.I.C. 91(b)(1)(2). People v. Prince Case No. ST-10-CR-277 Memorandum Opinion, December 13, 2012 stabbed his half-brother, Tyshown Belle, in his left side with a knife? On August 3, 2010, the jury found Defendant guilty on all counts. On September 23, 2010, the Court merged Counts III and IV with Counts I and II, sentenced Defendant to a term of imprisonment of seven (7) years and six (6) months on Count II, and sentenced Defendant to a term of imprisonment of one (1) year on Count I to run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Count Two. Defendant timely appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands, which affirmed his conviction in a September 13, 2012, Opinion and Order. STANDARD Super. Ct. R. 136 permits the court to “reduce a sentence within 120 days after the sentence is imposed or within 120 days after any order or other mandate issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal.” ANALYSIS Defendant’s Motion for a Sentence Reduction was timely filed under Super. Ct. R. 136 because it was filed within 120 days of the Supreme Court’s September 13, 2012, dismissal of Defendant’s appeal. However, although the Court has closely reviewed Defendant’s brief* and heartfelt submissions of Defendant’s family and friends in support of Defendant’s Motion, the Court does not have the discretion to reduce Defendant’s sentence under the mandatory minimum sentencing requirements of 14 V.I.C. § 2254(a). As previously 3 Count II and IV both charged Defendant with Using a Dangerous Weapon During the Commission or Attempted Commission of a Crime of Violence, in violation of 14 V.LC. §2251(a)(2). 4 The Court commends Defendant for completing an Anger Management Course on October 26, 2012. People v. Prince Case No. ST-10-CR-277 Memorandum Opinion, December 13, 2012 explained in the Court’s February 16, 2011, Memorandum Opinion, under 14 V.I.C. § 2254(a), A person convicted pursuant to section 2251 . . .of having, possessing, bearing, transporting carrying or having under his proximate control a deadly or dangerous weapon as therin described during the commission or attempted commission of a crime of violence shall be incarcerated for a term of imprisonment of not less than one-half of the maximum sentence specified in that section. (emphasis added). Further, a person who is convicted under 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2) “shall not have his sentence suspended, deferred, or withheld, nor shall such person be eligible for probation, parole, or any other form of release prior to serving the mandatory minimum.”° Thus, because Defendant was convicted under 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2)(B), using a dangerous weapon during the commission of a crime of violence, and 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2)(B) carries a statutory maximum sentence of fifteen (15) years imprisonment,° the Court does not have the discretion to reduce Defendant’s term of imprisonment below seven (7) years and six (6) months, one-half of the maximum sentence stated in 14 V.I.C. § 2251(a)(2)(B). Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for a Sentence Reduction is denied. An Order consistent with this Opinion shall follow. Dated: December 3. , 2012 Th Cs > HON. MICHAEL C. DUNSTON JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Supervisor (OX if Court Clerk ° 14 vick 2254 (b). ® 14 V.1.C. § 2251 (a)(2)(B) states, “Whoever . . . with intent to use [a dangerous or deadly weapon] unlawfully against another . . . bares, transports, carries or has under his proximate control any such [deadly or dangerous] weapon during the commission or attempted commission of a crime of violence (as defined in section 2253(d)(1) hereof) shall be fined $10,000 and imprisoned not more than fifteen (15) years, which penalty shall be in addition to the penalty provided for the commission of, or attempt to commit, the crime of violence.” SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) CASE NO. ST-10-CR-277 HARIM ALMANDO PRINCE Defendant. ORDER Upon consideration of the premises, it is hereby ORDERED that pro se Defendant Harim Almando Prince’s Motion for a Sentence Reduction is DENIED; and it is ORDERED that copies of the Memorandum Opinion and Order shall be directed to pro se Defendant Prince and to counsel of record. Dated: December /3, 2012 ATT. etia H. Velazqyez, Esq. JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT rk of Court OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS by ori B. Tyso Court Cler upervisor/, ALLE