Baptiste v. Rohn, Lee J.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX JESSICA BAPTISTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 2013-0104 LEE J. ROHN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ) D/B/A LAW OFFICES OF LEE J. ROHN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Andrew C. Simpson, Esq., Emily Shoup, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Gordon C. Rhea, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Lee J. Rohn, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries” (Dkt. No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_13-cv-00104/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_13-cv-00104-6.pdf
SHA-256 88f8c9f4647b8c3cd5a8a9b3534f28b2091005f0d673633a69b63df3c1a2355e
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-88f8c9f4647b
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX JESSICA BAPTISTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 2013-0104 LEE J. ROHN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ) D/B/A LAW OFFICES OF LEE J. ROHN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Andrew C. Simpson, Esq., Emily Shoup, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Gordon C. Rhea, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Lee J. Rohn, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries” (Dkt. No. 53), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff will be permitted to introduce otherwise admissible evidence at trial pertaining to her lost wages; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries is DENIED AS Case: 1:13-cv-00104-WAL-EAH Document #: 139 Filed: 03/29/16 Page 1 of 2 2 MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Plaintiff’s representation in her Opposition, Plaintiff will not introduce at trial any evidence of damages relating to her (1) future medical expenses, (2) loss of earning capacity, and (3) permanency of injuries; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Plaintiff’s representations at trial, Plaintiff will not introduce any evidence of past medical expenses. SO ORDERED. Date: March 29, 2016 _______/s/_______ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:13-cv-00104-WAL-EAH Document #: 139 Filed: 03/29/16 Page 2 of 2