VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

CAPSULE REPORT NO. 8 — JULY 1986

Collection
University Records
Sub-shelf
webpac.uvi.edu (Internet Archive recovery)
Kind
Government Report
Island
St. Croix
Date
1986-07
Pages
2
Text
OCR Text

COLLEGE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Caribbean Research Institute WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER CAPSULE REPORT NO. 8 JULY 1986 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE ST. CROIX CARBONATE ROCK SYSTEM By Ivan P. Gill and Dennis K. Hubbard INTRODUCTION investigations into St. Croix’s geologic history date to before the turn of the century. Subsurface geological infor- mation is acquired through drilling records, data from out- crops and public well logs. The focus of this research was the central plain of the island. This central plain was formed by deposits of allu- vium and carbonate rocks (limestone). The limestone is referred to as “Kingshill” limestone and is the major water producing rock body on St. Croix. However, the available information on the subsurface geology of this formation is presently insufficient to permit informed decisions for the maximum exploitation of St. Croix’s water resources. From the standpoint of hydrology, geologic information is re- quired in order to mathematically model aquifer behavior. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://web.archive.org/web/20031129055052id_/http://webpac.uvi.edu:80/imls/cri_uvi/caprpt8/rocksystem.pdf

SHA-256 89848fa91d2e852a18996271093fa0b62b5481c3d1751c8e2ffcdbfd06571990

Re-using this document

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-89848fa91d2e

Document text

COLLEGE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Caribbean Research Institute WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER CAPSULE REPORT NO. 8 JULY 1986 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE ST. CROIX CARBONATE ROCK SYSTEM By Ivan P. Gill and Dennis K. Hubbard INTRODUCTION investigations into St. Croix’s geologic history date to before the turn of the century. Subsurface geological infor- mation is acquired through drilling records, data from out- crops and public well logs. The focus of this research was the central plain of the island. This central plain was formed by deposits of allu- vium and carbonate rocks (limestone). The limestone is referred to as “Kingshill” limestone and is the major water producing rock body on St. Croix. However, the available information on the subsurface geology of this formation is presently insufficient to permit informed decisions for the maximum exploitation of St. Croix’s water resources. From the standpoint of hydrology, geologic information is re- quired in order to mathematically model aquifer behavior. From a strictly geologic standpoint, the information gath- ered allows the reconstruction of the development of St. Croix as an island and its part in the geologic history of the Caribbean basin. The carbonate rock system of the central plain was divided by the authors of this report into two layers called Kingshill limestone and Post-Kingshill limestone. The carbonates are thought to range from 0 to 600 feet thick and are underlain by a dark impermeable Jealousy Formation clay that exceeds 1400 feet in thickness. This report dif- fered from other research findings in several ways; one major difference was that in this report the Post-Kingshill limestone was discussed as a separate and distinct unit, another difference was that this research was concerned primarily with the rocks found in the southeastern section of the central plains area. There has been considerable evolution of thought con- cerning the formation of the geology of the central part of St. Croix. According to the authors, the Kingshill lime- stone was formed in the middle Miocene age and the under- lying Jealousy Formation in the Oligocene age. The area in which the Kingshill carbonate was deposited has been des- cribed as a wedge shaped fault bound basin. The basin was open to the northeast and the south and was bracketed by the northside and eastern ranges of St. Croix. METHODS Six test holes were drilled with a rotary drilling rig cap- able of sampling to several hundred feet. The total drilling footage exceeded 1000 feet. With the help of the V.I. Depart- ment of Public Works personnel, well logs and summaries of previous water well drillings were collected and compiled. These reports were used to assess the thickness and the lateral extent of geologic units in the central plain of the island, and the nature of the Kingshill/Jealousy contact. Additional information from cores drilled by Martin Mari- etta Alumina and Tippets, Abbot, McCarty and Stratton Inc. were donated to this project. RESULTS The Kingshill limestone is varied lithologically over the area through which it extends. It is the most important aquifer unit on the island of St. Croix in terms of numbers of wells drilled, although yields vary according to location. The Post-Kingshill limestone was found to be a porous and permeable part of the carbonate section on St. Croix. The Post-Kingshill rocks are extensively utilized as water- bearing strata by private, public and industrial users. The porosity and permeability of these rocks are related both to depositional processes and to later alteration by geochem- ical effects. Depositionally, the Post-Kingshill carbonates representa considerable shallowing of the Kingshill basin. The Post-Kingshill carbonates have been extensively modi- fied by dissolution, cementation and mineralogic altera- tion. Research continues on the post depositional history of this unit. The Jealousy Formation underlies the entire central plain of the island, and can be considered the hydrologic basement. The transition from yellowish Kingshill to the bluish clays of the Jealousy is marked and abrupt. Well diggers almost invariably stop after reaching the clays, and the boundary is well marked on their drill logs. The investigation described in this report is part of an ongoing study and asa result the conclusions are not final. Further drilling would certainly aid reconstruction of the aquifer and will be discussed in future reports. Condensed by Yahaya Bello from: “Subsurface Geology of the St. Croix Carbonate Rock System” by Ivan P. Gilland Den- nis K. Hubbard, Technical Report No. 26, Water Resources Research Center, Caribbean Research Institute, CVI, St. Thomas, June 1986. For further information on this report contact: Water Resources Research Center College of the Virgin Islands St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 (809) 776-9200 The activities on which this report is based were finan- . ced in part by the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey through the Virgin Islands Water Resources Research Center. _The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products consti- tute their endorsement by the United States Government. 7 —— = nese ves on ea CI | a ay & (SNOADVLAUD) SSAISNYLNI (seaue snoaoejal5 Ul UMOYS JOU) WNIANTIV AUVNYALYNO "YW OOP) UeY) 49}2016 ssoUyDIy) 1210} S3LVNOGHVD HADNNOA + SNOLSAWIT TIIHSONIN ‘=~ m > rc ° c a < n ° Zz = = °o z Oo c < a ~~ ° c ® ° ° m z m : = °o oO m z m 199} JO SUD} [BJDASS 0} SSAUYDIY) O|qEIURA - SUN ayeUOqueD Sal }JoA0 SLINN SILSVIOONVOIOA GNV SNOZ9OVASANL SNOAOVLAYD "YW 009 SsouxoI4) WNnUIxewW (HADNNOA GNV ANSIOIW) "xJO12) "3S jo dew: 9/60j006 pezjjeseues *1 esnbyjy PPT LF SGNV1dN SNOAIVLAYS GNV NIV1d S3NOLSSWIT N3SSML38 AYVONNOG (pZ6L) UanReUM Jay