DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 STEPHEN PLANTE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2004-CV-0074 v. 5 5 BRET ALAN ROSANE, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Richard H. Hunter, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice to Court to Change Title of Motion (Docket No. 160). By said Notice, Plaintiff informs the Court that he filed a document in the above-captioned matter on December 4, 2007 (Docket No. 159) that bears the title “Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Appeal of Magistrate’s October 19, 2007 Order.” Plaintiff indicates that the document actually is a response to Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Order of November 7, 2007, and asks the Court to change the title of Docket No. 159 accordingly. However, at the same time Plaintiff filed said notice, he filed a second document (Docket No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00074/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00074-1.pdf
SHA-256 90e6c18003758dea23b00fe54a2565f353381c6ab6b33bb41b0113a1554037d5
Re-using this document
A work of the United States Government. Not subject to copyright in the United States under 17 U.S.C. § 105, and therefore in the public domain from the moment it was created.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-90e6c1800375
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 STEPHEN PLANTE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2004-CV-0074 v. 5 5 BRET ALAN ROSANE, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Richard H. Hunter, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice to Court to Change Title of Motion (Docket No. 160). By said Notice, Plaintiff informs the Court that he filed a document in the above-captioned matter on December 4, 2007 (Docket No. 159) that bears the title “Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Appeal of Magistrate’s October 19, 2007 Order.” Plaintiff indicates that the document actually is a response to Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Order of November 7, 2007, and asks the Court to change the title of Docket No. 159 accordingly. However, at the same time Plaintiff filed said notice, he filed a second document (Docket No. 161) that bears the title, “Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Order of November 7, 2007.” Given the fact that Plaintiff Case: 1:04-cv-00074-LDD Document #: 162 Filed: 12/07/07 Page 1 of 2 Plante v. Rosane 2004-CV-0074 Order already has filed another document with the correct title, the Court will strike the mistitled document from the record. Based upon the foregoing, the Court finds that a stay is not warranted. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that the document titled “Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Appeal of Magistrate’s October 19, 2007 Order”(Docket No. 159), filed December 4, 2007, is STRICKEN. ENTER: Dated: December 7, 2007 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:04-cv-00074-LDD Document #: 162 Filed: 12/07/07 Page 2 of 2