Perez v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc. Dba Cape Air
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 EDWARD PEREZ, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:10-cv-86 v. 5 5 HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a 5 CAPE AIR, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Stephanie L. Adler, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit (Docket No. 12). This order is issued without necessity of response. In view of the Court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file his response to Defendant’s motion to transfer venue and subsequent order deciding the said motion to transfer venue, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion to strike. Case: 1:10-cv-00086-RAM-EAH Document #: 13 Filed: 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2 Perez v. Hyannis Air Service 1:10-cv-86 Order WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_10-cv-00086/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_10-cv-00086-2.pdf
SHA-256 95bcb5a7a208b0e53ec3a4fd362efe2a3283e19b4610f166ab3652955ec912f5
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-95bcb5a7a208
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 EDWARD PEREZ, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:10-cv-86 v. 5 5 HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a 5 CAPE AIR, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Stephanie L. Adler, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit (Docket No. 12). This order is issued without necessity of response. In view of the Court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file his response to Defendant’s motion to transfer venue and subsequent order deciding the said motion to transfer venue, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion to strike. Case: 1:10-cv-00086-RAM-EAH Document #: 13 Filed: 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2 Perez v. Hyannis Air Service 1:10-cv-86 Order WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Response and Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue Based on Forum Non Conveniens and For Application of Massachusetts Law (Docket No. 8) is STRICKEN. 3. Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit, Plaintiff’s Affidavit[,] One Day Out of Time (Docket No. 10) is STRICKEN. ENTER: Dated: December 2, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:10-cv-00086-RAM-EAH Document #: 13 Filed: 12/02/10 Page 2 of 2